Lukashenko: Not a united Russia! The West is also good!

5
Against the background of the aggravation of relations between Russia and the West, especially Great Britain, the recent months have seen a revival of contacts between Belarus, our partner in the Union State, with the same Western countries, especially with Great Britain.





You don’t think anything like that, it is just a coincidence.

Russia and its allies

Today, more and more often they recall the statement of one of the Russian emperors, who said that Russia has only two allies - this is the army and navy. Even taking into account the fact that since then aviation and strategic missile forces have been added to these allies, still this is somehow not enough. Even for a country that occupies one fifth of the land.

No, well, to scare everyone, it’s enough. Somehow even self-esteem rises when everyone around you is wary. For a comfortable and safe existence, this is good, but not enough. We have to build partnerships with neighbors.

And with whom to build? Not with Ukraine? Enough of these scumbags that they were officially recognized and made handshakes. Although, I think, they overdid it a bit. They came up with the idea of ​​officially recognizing a terrorist state where the leadership came to power through a coup d'etat and launched a war against its own people with the use of a heavy military equipment! And against the Russian and Russian-speaking population living in the immediate vicinity of the metropolitan federal district of the Russian Federation.

With the republics of Donbass? Also not an option. They do not exist in nature. According to official documents signed including by Russian representatives, this is fantastic. There is neither a DNR nor an LC, there are only “separate districts of Donetsk and Lugansk regions”. ORDLO, as they say in "ridiculous Nenko." And people there live "not enough Russians" to take them into account.

It remains, perhaps, Belarus. Our younger brothers are the same Slavs. Like Kipling: "You and I are of the same blood - you and me." With them we have an allied agreement.

Belarus and its "multi-vector"

Russia and Belarus are not just allies. They are two halves of one Union State. Although our countries are completely independent from each other, they agreed on close cooperation in many sectors, especially in the military and economic areas, as well as partially in the external policy.

But, despite close cooperation with Russia, more and more disagreements have recently arisen. Suddenly, “trade wars” begin with prohibitions on the import of certain types of products under the pretext of their inconsistency with sanitary or other standards. Then suddenly one side begins to intensify contacts with countries with which the other partner is cooling relations.

The Belarusian leadership has announced its "multi-vector nature" and is trying to get the most out of any situation. Mutual import bans between Russia and the EU countries significantly enriched Belarus. Various goods, receiving a “Belarusian residence permit”, easily overcome all restrictions. And the “sanctioned raw materials”, supplied from the East and West, significantly revived the work of Belarusian manufacturers.

International contacts of Belarus

The Belarusian president has proclaimed that his country will adhere to a multi-vector policy in international relations. This means that Belarus has set a course for maintaining good relations with all its close and distant neighbors. Such a policy bears fruit, because folk wisdom says: "The affectionate calf of two mothers sucks."

No matter how obliquely glancing at Belarus from the West or East, its intermediary role can hardly be overestimated. Can you imagine a better platform for negotiations on the Donbass crisis than Minsk?

Of course, in Russia, few have any illusions about the reliability of the alliance with Belarus. The aggravation between Russia and Western countries under the pretext of poisoning the Skripals did not affect Belarus’s contacts with Western countries. They even stepped up.

For example, in the midst of anti-Russian hysteria, March 27-28, Belarusian Foreign Minister Vladimir Makei visited the UK. This visit can be called historical, since the last time such a trip occurred back in 1993. And Deputy Foreign Minister Oleg Kravchenko was visiting the United States at that time. And this is against the background of the fact that Sergey Lavrov’s trip to the UK was canceled due to the conflict.

Belarus is imperative to create a positive image in the West. Although Lukashenko is less and less called the “last dictator of Europe”, EU sanctions against Belarus have been extended for another 2018.

So the current Belarusian leadership is trying to sit on two chairs at once, to support a “multi-vector policy”, and both Russia and the West like it. It is bad that it does not learn from other people's examples. Recently there was such a “multi-vector” president in Ukraine, Viktor Fedorovich Yanukovych, who also wanted to sit in two chairs and everyone would like. True, he did not sit still.

Of course, it is wrong to compare the Belarusian president with Viktor Fedorovich. Alexander Grigoryevich Lukashenko has a firmer inner core, and the economic situation in the country is better. But still, you need to be more careful when choosing friends and partners, otherwise mistakes can be expensive.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    April 2 2018 22: 29
    Yes, for a long time it is necessary to throw Belarus. Assistance is only granted if certain conditions are met.
  2. 0
    April 2 2018 23: 48
    Quote: NordOst16
    Yes, for a long time it is necessary to throw Belarus. Assistance is only granted if certain conditions are met.

    I completely agree with you. As the saying goes: friend is friend, but give the tobacco apart.
    Once separately, then separately. Independent means to act with her as an independent.
    Probably in the end it will be so.
  3. +1
    April 3 2018 02: 51
    But still, you need to be more careful when choosing friends and partners, otherwise mistakes can be expensive.

    That's it. Sometimes you look at some of your partners and you want to say: “And I, by the way, comrades Dzhabrail, Miller, Sechin, Topilin, were put here in order to look after the state interests! Yes Not your selfish ones. Observe, as spelled out in the union agreement. “Belarus does not have so many forests, fields and rivers for a Belarusian citizen to feel free and at ease. Therefore, Lukashenka has to spin if allied partners are constantly inflating cheeks and tariffs. "In Russia itself, where does the consumer's interests stand? What are the recent steps to raise gasoline prices? And what about the proposal to" throw "Belarus. It remains to throw Belarus and China. There is no one else to throw. There are no" suckers "left.
    1. +1
      April 3 2018 17: 11
      Neither Belarus nor China are far from suckers. In both of these countries, national interests come first, and rightly so. And the proposal to "throw Belarus" runs counter to Russian national interests.

      Yes, Belarus is actively maneuvering, but this is a very dangerous game. So far, Lukashenko is doing well, he is a very wise politician, but one should not forget the example of former Ukrainian President Yanukovych, who tried to maneuver between Russia and Europe and lost everything.

      The line is very thin, while the Belarusian leadership feels it, everything will be fine. The main thing is not to play too much.

      And you are right, Russia cannot afford to scatter allies.
  4. +1
    April 14 2018 20: 42
    Alexander Grigoryevich Lukashenko has a firmer inner core, and the economic situation in the country is better.

    So far, Moscow is issuing loans and writing off old ones ... in such circumstances Yarysh himself would have pursued pro-Russian policies, and here his comrades would not like Moscow’s discontent, then the St. George ribbons would be banned (so that the Russian people knew who the boss was in the former BSSR), then not a single one Moscow’s foreign policy act on recognition of Abkhazia, South Ossetia and reunification with the Crimea does not recognize (this is so that senior comrades on Smolenskaya Square do not roll their lips) ...
    In a word, with such allies, enemies are not needed ....

    “We are scared that Russia, they say, will invent its“ centipedes ”and will transport nuclear warheads on its own - and on health! If they have brains and money today that they don’t have, let them invent!", - said Lukashenko, referring to the director of the state enterprise and the group of officials accompanying him.

    https://cont.ws/@ytokarev/388973