Russian fighter forcibly planted intruder

6
The Russian military was forced to land an intruder that flew into the airspace of the Pskov region from the Baltic. The aircraft did not respond to the requests of the security forces and continued its journey deep into the territory of the Russian Federation. The agency became aware of this. Interfax.





It is reported that the plane managed to fly to the Novgorod region before it was spotted and intercepted. The operation involved fighter aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces. The intruder moved at low altitude, possibly trying to go unnoticed by the radar.

Seeing the Russian fighters, the pilot turned to the Pskov region, but he was forced to land at the nearest airfield. The pilot himself was subsequently detained by law enforcement officials. His identity is still unknown.

At the moment, it is not entirely clear why the intruder was only seen in the airspace of the Novgorod region, because more than 100 km to the border with the European Union. A light-engine aircraft overcomes such a distance in at least 20-25 minutes.

Recall that in 1987 the plane of the citizen of Germany Matthias Rust landed right on Red Square in Moscow, flying unnoticed by the Soviet air defense.
6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. beeper
    beeper
    +1
    April 19 2019 11: 49
    Apparently the smuggler was flying at random, it is unlikely that "common people" so "probed" the state border, too stupidly and insolently (although I do not exclude such reconnaissance or the penetration of an agent, everything can be)
    With M.Rust, another story was-so "shocking (resonant impudent violation of the state border on our holiday of the Border Troops!)" UN-WINNING (would have brought down the "Cessna" of the violator or not, "caps and shoulder straps" would still fly!) In a way, "common people "helped their" agent of influence "in the Kremlin and his accomplices to remove the intractable Soviet generals in the leadership of the USSR Ministry of Defense, who by their passive obstruction prevented" friend Michael "from destroying the defenses of the Soviet Union.
    The flight of M. Rust WAS NOT "UNNOTED for the Soviet air defense" !!! It's just that the control panels did not have those who on this holiday would take personal responsibility for stopping the flight of the intruder! The seeds of Gorbachev's destructive "catastrophe" and the pro-American "ambivalence" of the Supreme Commander (the pitiful "henpecked" of his wife?), Surrender and betrayal by the Kremlin "top" of everything and everyone, gave their pernicious shoots in the army - none of the high-ranking military men wanted to be "objectionable "at the spineless Zapadogodnik" Gorby ", but the professional" parquet "careerists had a long time to spit on the Fatherland and the Soviet people — take Rust even a nuclear charge to Red Square ?!
    So "those who got under the distribution", according to the results of the "rust fly", it turns out that in vain they ate huge folk remedies, indecisive at the most crucial moment, the Ministry of Defense Marshal Sokolov and his big stars (and I would, then, only a starley, being an air defense officer and find yourself on the way Rustovskaya "Cessna", "smudge" on the offender from all available barrels and missiles without wasting time, would act "in combat", and then would report "on command", but not fate, maybe for the better ??? winked ) the minions deserve their punishment, albeit by the hands of anti-people traitors, Secretary General Gorbachev and his packs ... request
    1. Kristallovich
      Kristallovich
      +2
      April 19 2019 12: 05
      The flight of M. Rust WAS NOT "UNNOTED for the Soviet air defense" !!! It's just that the control panels did not have those who on this holiday would take personal responsibility for stopping the flight of the intruder!

      there are many different tales on this score ... just in those days, confusion and reeling reigned supreme in the army.
      1. beeper
        beeper
        +1
        April 19 2019 15: 17
        "Bordelier according to Shukshin" with the reassignment of responsibility was due to the then recent "case" of the Amerovskoy setup with the South Korean Boeing on September 1, 1983 and the subsequent derogatory "debriefing" under General Secretary Yu.V. Andropov, and then, in this leapfrog of temporary secretaries general, another, too "wobbly" and indistinct, "young general secretary" - Andropov's protege, with his Raykhon (Raichka in Uzbek) and hypersonic hangers-on, including in "striped pants "- it was unclear" Gorby's reaction if something happened "... or rather, it was already clear, but I didn't want to believe in it (betrayal at the very top)!
        And Rust's plane was "led" by the Soviet air defense to Moscow - he flew right over the highway ... the festive atmosphere and the bossy "relax" also played a role.
  2. sgrabik
    sgrabik
    +2
    April 19 2019 12: 37
    How many similar cases have already happened. It is simply not clear what is happening in our videoconferencing. For each situation, there are clear conditions for action. If the offender does not obey commands, then he must be destroyed. What or who prevents to strictly and strictly observe the rules that are prescribed in the textbooks ???
    1. beeper
      beeper
      0
      April 19 2019 15: 29
      hi Actually, the actions of the Armed Forces are regulated by the CHARTERS, not by "textbooks", but your "thought" is correct! good
  3. steelmaker
    steelmaker
    +2
    April 20 2019 11: 15
    It is necessary to shoot down, but not to force !!!!