Khodaryonok: The unique situation allows us to put pressure on Kyiv and end the Second World War on Russia's terms.

October 1 2026 19 473 66

Russia has managed to achieve a significant advantage in air strikes and inflict heavy losses on Ukraine. Under these circumstances, a ceasefire or any other kind of ceasefire is not in Russia's interests. This was reported on the radio. "Vesti" stated military observer, retired colonel Mikhail Khodaryonok.

He noted that the enemy must be pressed until the Central Military District is concluded on Russia's terms. Combat operations must continue while the opportunity remains.

A rather unique situation has now emerged, characterized by the air superiority of our latest-generation UAVs and ballistic missiles. And the enemy has no effective means of countering either...

- he specified.

Ukraine currently has problems with air defense, and this must be taken advantage of without slowing down the pace of attacks.

The attacks continue to escalate, and in this regard, such a favorable opportunity to inflict significant losses on the enemy and force them, to a certain extent, to move toward peace negotiations based on Russia's terms is rare. If the attacks continue at the same pace, with the same force, and target those targets, they could lead to the paralysis of the entire Ukrainian system. economics, life support and transport systems

- he added.

Khodaryonok explained that accepting Kyiv's proposals is inadvisable. The Ukrainian authorities have made various proposals, ranging from refraining from striking energy facilities and merchant vessels in the Black Sea to allowing the line of contact to be established. But Moscow has no reason to participate in such a thing. The enemy is weakening and needs a respite. This explains everything. The Ukrainians will rest, recover, and then resume the fight with renewed vigor.

But such ceasefires, when the clock has clearly swung in our favor, will lead to nothing good in the course of the armed struggle. And the most favorable impact will only be on the position of the Ukrainian military.political leadership, which will give them time to recover, somehow regroup, and strengthen their air defense capabilities

he explained.

In his opinion, the enemy must be finished off, and then everything will end naturally, without any further consequences. Only through attacks can Russia achieve a good result in the SVO in Ukraine.

Therefore, now there are no truces, no moratoriums, no ceasefires, no fixing of the line of combat contact.

He summed up.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

savage3000

-12

1 October 2026 20: 45

Hmm... that guy there is going completely crazy on his broadcasts...
1. Botrops
  
  +5
  
  2 October 2026 08: 12
  
  What's wrong with him? In my opinion, he laid everything out logically.
  1. Glagol1
    
    +1
    
    2 October 2026 11: 32
    
    He doesn't take into account that Ukraine has a constant flow of weapons and equipment from the West, and equally constant funding. The junta needs new supplies, and it receives them regularly. Ultimately, they don't care what happens to 404; millions have already been stolen and are multiplying. Our main window of opportunity is the proper distribution of targets. No garages, barns, gas stations, Academy of Sciences buildings, etc. Ports, ships, railway bridges, locomotives, factories, power plants, warehouses. Concentrate fire on these priority targets. And even this may not lead to negotiations—the junta will simply lose the ability to govern and will flee.
  2. savage3000
    
    -4
    
    2 October 2026 12: 50
    
    That one hundred is just utter nonsense. That's all. I didn't even read past the headline.
    1. Botrops
      
      +1
      
      3 October 2026 09: 50
      
      I see. I haven't read it, but I condemn it.
2. The comment was deleted.
vlad127490

+ 15

1 October 2026 20: 56

There is only one solution for Ukraine in favor of the Russian people. The state of Ukraine must cease to exist. All of Ukraine's territory, within the 1975 borders, must return to Russia as regions. No one needs to ask permission; everything must be done unilaterally. There is no state, Ukraine, no debts, no Ukrainian government in exile, no legal Banderites, no Ukraine members in various international organizations, no hostile state on the Russian Federation's border. Russia will increase its economic and military-political influence in the world, with direct access to Tiraspol and Chisinau. The northwestern Black Sea will belong to Russia. NATO will no longer be able to use Ukraine against Russia.
Even if part of the state of Ukraine is left, then today and in the future, Russia will always have an enemy in the person of Ukraine. Ukraine will definitely join NATO and will definitely attack Russia. Everything that is promised and will be spelled out in the Constitution of Ukraine, in its documents, Ukraine will change, in the way that is beneficial to the United States and its satellites.
Any half-hearted decision is the defeat and capitulation of the Russian Federation to NATO.
1. VSO-396
  
  0
  
  1 October 2026 21: 35
  
  Quote: vlad127490
  There is only one solution for Ukraine in favor of the Russian people. The state of Ukraine must cease to exist. All of Ukraine's territory, within its 1975 borders, must return to Russia as oblasts. There's no need to ask anyone's permission; everything must be done unilaterally. There's no state, Ukraine, no debts, no government of Ukraine in exile, no legal Banderites, no participants in Ukraine.
  
  What happened in 1975? If that year is your starting point? Incidentally, the Ukrainian government-in-exile existed then.
  1. vlad127490
    
    0
    
    1 October 2026 23: 20
    
    The Helsinki Accords of 1975. All states endorsed the post-war arrangement regarding the inviolability of borders. Thirty-five states signed the agreement. To date, no one has withdrawn their signature.
  2. k7k8
    
    -8
    
    2 October 2026 07: 50
    
    Quote: VSO-396
    If you take this year as a starting point?
    
    He's just plucking this year from the air. He's been copying and pasting this thing for five years. In short, the character's a nutcase.
Roman070280

-4

1 October 2026 21: 04
And who started 10/5 years ago?
Why are they only now ready to throw a grenade at them?? Are they ready yet?
And what right does a Kremlin profiteer have to tie himself to the Soviets?? And even more so soldier!!
A Soviet soldier gave his life for free against the Americans, not for 2,5 million against "our brothers."

Putin... Results...
1. Botrops
  
  -2
  
  2 October 2026 08: 16
  
  Why, suddenly, is he not connected to the Soviet soldier? His relatives fought in the Great Patriotic War, just like everyone else's. The Russian Federation is the legal successor to the USSR. So Soviet history is the history of each of us, too. Including the President.
  1. aslanxnumx
    
    +1
    
    2 October 2026 21: 05
    
    So why can't Russia, the successor to the USSR, defeat Ukraine, like the USSR defeated Germany? Instead of winning, Putin is looking for someone to help him broker a deal.
    1. Botrops
      
      -2
      
      3 October 2026 22: 44
      
      Because Russia is not at war with Ukraine, but with NATO.
      NATO provides Ukraine
      1- communication system
      2-reconnaissance system, including space
      3- the control system
      Just remove this and the army of both NATO and Ukraine will turn into an army from the First World War.
      And besides that
      4- weapons and ammunition
      5- money
      6- advisors and combat crews for various types of complexes
      7 mercenaries from all over the world
      1. aslanxnumx
        
        +1
        
        4 October 2026 16: 20
        
        From the smears of sagging Fabergé. And the frontal assaults, the battle for the street, the house, the forest belt—NATO is also to blame. What the crests seized in a couple of days, then took a year or more to liberate—who's to blame?
        
        Botrops
        
        -1
        
        4 October 2026 22: 17
        
        These aren't excuses, they're facts. Ukraine is only providing cannon fodder. In war, there are no mistakes and hiccups. Those only happen on the couch. And yes, NATO is also to blame for the fact that every populated area has to be taken like a fortress. The Ukies have NATO weapons. And their advisers, too. And intelligence. And communications. Without all of this, you can't hold a town, let alone a city. No communications, no command. And whose communications do the Ukies have, may I remind you? No matter how slowly they liberate, the process is moving forward. Need it faster? Well, speed it up with your personal involvement.
        
        aslanxnumx
        
        0
        
        5 October 2026 20: 18
        
        ourselves in acceleration
        
        Botrops
        
        0
        
        6 October 2026 08: 17
        
        Of course. My son is fighting in the Northeastern Military District. And, unlike you, I'm not demanding immediate results to fill Slavyansk and Kramatorsk with the corpses of our soldiers. Let the Ukrainians do the work.
2. Alexey Lan
  
  +2
  
  2 October 2026 11: 00
  
  against "our brothers"
  
  Well, what can I say about "our brothers"? Nothing. There were many of them: Bulgarians, Georgians, Armenians, Belarusians, Ukrainians. Where are they? Everyone has their own interests, which, fortunately, don't sharply conflict with Russia's. It's time to stop this empty talk about brothers and sisters.
smtm

0

1 October 2026 21: 31

The part about "...the clock hand..." was awesome!!!)))
Sergey Latyshev

+3

1 October 2026 21: 35

5 years the same ...
beeper

-2

1 October 2026 22: 10

Yes, all these "hodaryonki-kittens" just won't understand that at least
Even if you bomb the whole of Ukraine, burn and destroy the entire multinational Ukrainian population, but "guarantee" not to destroy the "Kyiv bunch of Nazis and drug addicts" of the Dobaneras, there will be no "peaceful solution"!!!

Just as there will be no end to the war between NATO countries against the Russian Federation on the Ukrainian "frontline" - with the inevitable breakthrough of NATO hordes (proxy and regular) into the "old" Russian territories (and who would fire "nukes" at their own territory, even if the "Kremlin-bourgeois conspirators" suddenly decided to do so)!
And besides the "Ukrainian question," NATO's Tiraspol and Kaliningrad provocations are already brewing—a "thrust and expansion of the theater..." is evident, along with a creeping escalation of the "Drang nach Osten"—while the Kremlin's "geochashist-like" give-away players are clearly trying to "sit it out in the house," hiding behind demagogic "threatening rhetoric" and glorifying media "security"???
1. Botrops
  
  -1
  
  2 October 2026 08: 21
  
  Well, Khodarenok, on the contrary, is calling for an end to hostilities. What is he supposed to understand? Call for an end to them, or what? No one will attack their own territory. But they certainly will attack European territory. What's stopping them, for example, if NATO troops suddenly enter Kaliningrad, from launching a nuclear strike on Brussels and Paris in response to the aggression?
  No one's planning on sitting it out in the house. If they were, they would have agreed to temporary ceasefires and freezes on the LBS long ago, which are disadvantageous to us.
  1. beeper
    
    +1
    
    2 October 2026 11: 17
    
    Evgeny aka Вotrops, read more carefully and don't distort my message to such "hodarenkos"!
    "What should he understand?" I specifically highlighted clearly even "for those who are in the armored train" and have a hard time getting it, like yours!
    Let me repeat it especially for you:
    
    We need to hit the Dobanderite "bunch of Nazis and drug addicts," and not just "destroy" the local population and infrastructure, hoping that "Ukrainians (multinational, including Russian, Ukrainian residents) will die out, sitting on the neck of Europe, and will understand the futility of war with Russia" (Ukrainian residents, even those who jumped on the "Maidans", understand perfectly well that the "Moscow neo-bourgeois raven does not peck and will not peck the eyes of "his neo-bourgeois" Kyiv raven). "- the Russian, "conditionally Russian", and Ukrainian oligarchic "lords and masters", Western servile compradors, have clashed among themselves for the capitalist redistribution of the "seized" former public property, business markets and the seizure of resources - for the sake of their successful "businesses", while the "serfs" - the disenfranchised in the conditions of wild post-Soviet neo-capitalism, the ordinary workers of our former union republics - are dying and suffering)!!!
    Then there will be progress in the SVOW and a peaceful solution on the Kremlin's terms!
    Until this "guaranteed" destruction of the "Kyiv bunch of drug addicts and Nazis" of the Dobaneras takes place, the bloody SVO war in Ukraine, generously fueled by the West and mega-profitable for Russian, Ukrainian, Western, Eastern, and Middle Eastern oligarchs, will be endless and has a tendency to spread to the "old" Russian territories!
    1. Botrops
      
      -1
      
      2 October 2026 13: 43
      
      Pishchak, Ako Pishchak, who told you that the war would end if the Ukrainian leadership was destroyed? Especially considering that a candidate to replace Zelenskyy is already ready? As you rightly noted, the war is being waged not by Zelenskyy, but by NATO and Russia. Therefore, Zelenskyy's role is purely decorative and executive. And executives are easily replaced. And as the example of Iran shows, the destruction of the leadership doesn't always mean the end of the war. On the contrary, it can rage even more fiercely.
      In my opinion, it's not Zelensky who needs to be destroyed, but European targets. A British missile hit our oil refinery—a hazelnut should hit a British oil refinery, too. A Czech vampire hit a residential area in the Belgorod region? Let the Czech gentlemen not hold it against us for a missile of our caliber hitting a residential area in a Czech city. As long as the European gentlemen are in pain and discomfort, we won't step on their toes—the war will continue. So the question is rhetorical: Is your armored train on the right track, comrade?
      1. Serj Iff
        
        +2
        
        2 October 2026 15: 37
        
        Evgeny, imagine Zelenskyy has been destroyed and they're looking for a new person to replace him. And they offer you the job. And you know how Zelenskyy ended up and that the next one will end up the same way. Would you happily run for president of Ukraine? Or would you think about it? You only get one life.
        
        Botrops
        
        0
        
        3 October 2026 10: 00
        
        I agree, there's a risk. But on the other hand, you could make a killing and become a billionaire in this position. Buy a house in Miami or the Foggy Albion. Get guarantees, say, from the UK, that they'll grant you political asylum if anything happens. And eliminating Zelensky isn't so easy. It's no wonder he spends so much time abroad. And in Ukraine, he could be spending it in bunkers. Pavel Sudoplatov's department needs to be revived. So that after the end of the SVO, characters like Zemlya and Boris Johnson can be brought to any place on the planet by order of the Basmanny Court.
        
        Botrops
        
        -1
        
        3 October 2026 22: 10
        
        Life only lasts once, but it can be varied. And if Zaluzhny were offered a vacancy with the potential to earn millions, buy a villa in Miami, and receive political asylum if something goes wrong... I think it's not just Zaluzhny—many others would agree. There's a risk. But there's also the opportunity to make money, and not badly, either. And Russia is to blame for this. Destroying Zelensky isn't so easy. He can flee to Europe at the slightest provocation. He could be hiding in a bunker in Ukraine. Pasha Sudoplatov's department needs to be revived. Basmanny Court rulings should be issued with the highest penalty and enforced, regardless of the statute of limitations or the client's place of residence. And we could start with Boris Johnson, at least. Then the Zelenskys will know that he and his family won't be safe even behind the fences of their villas. But we're not going to implement the second part. Which means there won't be a shortage of volunteers. Because then, they are confident, they are guaranteed a safe and rich life.
      2. beeper
        
        +2
        
        2 October 2026 18: 20
        
        Evgeny, aka Botrops, I see you've already received a basic answer regarding the advisability of swiftly eliminating the intractable "Kyiv bunch of Nazis and drug addicts" and systematically "thinning out the bench" until a "negotiable generation" of Ukrainian politicians emerges, ready to sign Banderland's capitulation on Moscow's terms!
        Your "stereotypical thinking" is evident, because "you can't see the forest for the trees"!
        You yourself emphasize the puppet character of the current unprincipled and unprincipled cowards (who are trembling for their own skin with terrible force; remember the behavior of Zelts, who fled abroad in the first days of the SVO, before he was informed of the encouraging "Putin's guarantees to the Israelis" ) the nouveau riche "Maidan authorities" of Banderland and then, as if "analogous" to them, you thoughtlessly cite the example of the highly motivated, highly ideological, fearless and patriotic secular and religious authorities of Iran and the defense management of the entire country and its individual regions organized by them, from top to bottom, resilient to the losses of senior commanders!
        What kind of short-sightedness is in your "reasonings," Evgeny? You don't bother to think critically for yourself, or are you incapable of it, untrained to do so, but only repeat what was instilled in you by "the guards of their bourgeoisie," just like about the supposedly "indestructible Soviet (in Putin's parlance, these are "Soviet galoshes" that we built "that no one needs") bridges across the Dnieper." For five years now, the Kremlin's media lackeys of "business strategists" have been blabbering to you?!
        *****
        This is also, in more detail, in my comments, including these last few days, in my profile on the Reporter Website.
        Since October 6, 2016, I have been registered on the Military Review website (which I had only read for many years before that) and on its sister site, the Reporter, since the very first day of its founding. I remember that old photo of three Israeli girls with rifles sitting on a fence. .
        Only my attitude towards VVP has changed, because before the start of the SVO I thought that he was just a “super-cautious fool, not reaching for the stars.”
        They say that although he is "not a strategist", he is, as best he can, using all his strength, dodging before the West and the East - protecting Russians and the remnants of Great Russia, stupidly hacked to pieces by the Judas-humpbacked Yeltsinoid people, from the war imposed by Washington, but it turned out that VVP and the "cadres he selected", completely thieving, unprincipled, untalented "neo-bourgeois liberals", incapable of anything constructive, adventurously plunged the Russian Federation into this endless HIS war and the coming open armed conflict with the consolidated and replenished (previously "neutral" Sweden, Finland) "universal" NATO for the destruction of Russia-Russian World!
        Why the "rhetoric," Evgeny? If I, with my now highly sought-after "talents," despite my miserable existence, flatly refuse lucrative monetary offers from the Bandera "defense industry and military," and, under the deadly explosions of Russian missiles (the other day I was lucky enough to survive another close explosion and a fan of lethal shrapnel, I'm surprised myself, since it was only by chance, just a hair's breadth, that I narrowly escaped death; I still shudder when I remember it) and drones, haven't become embittered and in no way am I complicit with the aforementioned Banderonazis in their war against Russia, then my "armored train" is on the right track.
        If only Putin and the entire "rowing crew of the Kremlin towers' galley" would finally "begin" the promised "planned denazification and demilitarization of Banderland" without fooling around, but as expected, with the "Kyiv bunch of Nazis and drug addicts" and the "Maidan abomination regime" as a whole, then there will be a swift end to this inter-bourgeois SVOWAR, and Russian and Ukrainian "serfs" will stop dying!
        
        Botrops
        
        -1
        
        3 October 2026 22: 37
        
        Yes, I wrote that Zelensky is a decorative figure. This means that his place, without any significant damage to Bandera's cause, could easily be taken by someone else. Like Zaluzhny. They'll offer him millions, political asylum, and a villa on the Atlantic coast. After the Second World War, Russia, it seems, has no plans to bother anyone behind the fences of their villas.
        Ukraine also has an ideology.
        And the name is Nazism. And hatred of Russia. The Ukrainian people still have passion. They went out for the Orange Revolution, for the Maidan. Just recently, for the protests regarding Fyodorov. But no one even uttered a word when the Russian Orthodox Church was oppressed, when the Russian language was banned... so is Zelensky alone to blame? Is a nation that has renounced its common faith truly fraternal?
        Yes, the Central Military District lasts four years. But we're not fighting Ukraine, we're fighting NATO. No, I'm not against destroying Zelenograd. But in this scenario, it's better to spend military potential on Europe rather than on Zelenograd. For every British shad that lands at the refinery, a nutcracker should be sent on a similar voyage to Britain. In my opinion, that's more constructive.
        
        beeper
        
        +1
        
        4 October 2026 05: 36
        
        Well, Victor aka Bothrops, you're still "captive to stereotypes," you still haven't understood anything, and you're even considering international terrorism—you're even thinking of attacking the "far" Borka Johnson, beating up the "far" one to scare the "near" Zelts. Are you nuts, these are the "twists and turns" you've got?!
        Remember Occam's razor and keep it simple! And keep your perspective wide open, try to understand trends, and see the forest for the trees!
        From your "letters" I can clearly see your (as well as many ordinary Russian citizens, even many commentators on this Site) profound misconception about "Ukrainian realities" and "the nature of the Ukrainian authorities (the Maidan, as a special case of their general "tendency")"!
        In principle, with my comments on the Reporter I try to give a more or less realistic picture, but not everyone gets it!
        But the regular authors of the Site, Sergey Marzhetsky, Alexander Neukropny, and Yaroslav Dymchuk, are quite adequate in their assessments of Ukrainian realities (as well as possible "prospects" for future events) - this gives me hope!
        
        Botrops
        
        -2
        
        4 October 2026 10: 04
        
        Oh wow))) I've already become Viktor)) No one is going to intimidate anyone by bringing retribution to Johnson. And there's no point in intimidating a master's slave. Because nothing depends on him. The master must be hit. And Great Britain has richly deserved it. Patrushev, speaking about Crocus City, implied MI6's involvement in this terrorist attack. And you're suggesting we spare the continent's main terrorists))) And British shells regularly fly in to attack civilians in the Belgorod and Bryansk regions. And only an adequate response can bring a terrorist to his senses. Ultimately, we don't care about Ukrainian realities. Let Ukraine sort out what it's done over the past 30 years. Russia's job is to achieve its goals in this SVO. It doesn't need all of Ukraine for that.
        
        beeper
        
        +1
        
        4 October 2026 10: 52
        
        Evgeniy (not "Victor"), it was early in the morning. ) aka Botrops, don't attribute your "pity" fantasies to me, where did I write about this?!
        Well, I see that you have remained "on your own wavelength, in your little house", the same old "black grouse trills (when this bird is mating, it doesn't hear anything around it)" - getting through to your mind is "a difficult task", you just won't listen.
        
        Botrops
        
        -2
        
        4 October 2026 11: 10
        
        It's hard to get through to me, because, unlike you, I spent 25 years serving in the Russian Navy and have a military education, which I didn't get from articles on Military Review, sorry))) And therefore, I evaluate the situation in Ukraine from this point of view.
        
        beeper
        
        0
        
        5 October 2026 08: 32
        
        Evgeny aka Bothrops (even in English Bothrops is a naval sailor, does he write illiterately? ).
        What is this boastful superficiality in your "condemnations"?!
        After all, I've admitted more than once in comments on VO and the Reporter that I have a higher military education "with honors," a tank command education - "unlike you," not a naval one, but a Soviet one ("sharpened" specifically for a war with NATO through offensive actions in the European theater of military operations, through vast flood zones and American nuclear landmines on the FRG/GDR border)!
        I've been in journalism since school "wall newspapers" and army "Battle Sheets"!
        My personal file as a Soviet officer is probably still in the Podolsk Central State Archives of the Ministry of Defense of the USSR/Russian Federation. I will not give my "personal number" for obvious (I hope) reasons.
        Moreover, I have been "directly involved" in the situation, one might say, from the very beginning (all this "nationalist movements," supervised from above by republican "party committees" and the KGB, began during the Gorbachev-Yakovlev "catastroika") of "nezalezhnosti" (independence), I have been "stirring up" in the events in Ukraine, in the very frontline zone, under regular "attacks," from "ballistics" and "hypersonic" to banal "geranium-2s."
        So, "therefore," you boast in vain, sailor, about your "armchair assessments of the situation" - they are "stereotypical" for the majority of ordinary people without any "military education," completely instilled by complex (pre-Banderite, coupled with the Kremlin) bourgeois "propaganda and agitation"
        You even write the name of the country, "Ukraine," with a lowercase letter, just as your marginal "Ukrainian colleagues" write "Russia" with a lowercase letter. These are the same primitive, "emotional" habits of "led" ordinary people who are not accustomed to thinking critically and "seeing the forest for the trees"!
        
        Botrops
        
        +1
        
        5 October 2026 10: 39
        
        Evgeniy aka Botrops (even in English Botrops is a military sailor, does he write illiterately? winked).
        
        Alas... I didn't have a sailor in mind when I came up with my nickname. I dedicated it to Bothriechis schlegelii, commonly known as Schleigel's prehensile-tailed bothrops. And you're already rushing not only to false conclusions but also to accusations of illiteracy, based on their flimsy foundation.
        In expressing my views, I am presenting my perspective on the situation (which, by the way, I have every right to do). And I defend it to the best of my ability, having, incidentally, also served as editor of the "Boyevoy Listok" newspaper at one time.
        To categorically attribute to yourself the only correct view of a situation, no matter where or how long you've been involved, is reckless. Firstly, because only God knows the ultimate truth. Humans are prone to error.
        And secondly, not only the glorious graduates of armored schools are not the Lord God, but, alas, the editors of the “Combat Leaflets” are not either.
        As for the spelling of "Ukraine" with a lowercase letter...well, how else can one regard a country that, despite its loud declarations, has not fully decommunized? Parting with the communist legacy also requires rejecting communist gifts. These include the lands of western Ukraine, gifted by Comrade Stalin in 45; Crimea, kindly and inexplicably given away by Nikita Sergeyevich at a Central Committee plenary session in 1954; and, finally, eastern Ukraine, gifted by the leader of the world proletariat in 1922.
        So, the one who did not return the gifts and still owns them, having violated all obligations, is written only with a lowercase letter)))
        
        beeper
        
        0
        
        5 October 2026 10: 44
        
        Ehhh, Mr./Comrade Evgeny aka Botrops, the same “blinkeredness” of your thinking is still visible!
        But, overall, Plusanul is not hopeless!
        
        Botrops
        
        +1
        
        5 October 2026 10: 56
        
        Thank you, Mr./Comrade Pishchik))) I promise, for my part, that everything that can be written with a capital letter will be written that way)))
        
        beeper
        
        0
        
        5 October 2026 11: 51
        
        Just no fanaticism, please!
  2. VSO-396
    
    0
    
    3 October 2026 03: 29
    
    Quote: Botrops
    No one will attack their own territory. But they certainly will attack European territory. What's stopping, for example, if NATO troops suddenly enter Kaliningrad, from launching a nuclear strike on Brussels and Paris in response to the aggression?
    
    So, will a strike on Paris save Kaliningrad? The retaliatory strike will only arrive, and then on our territory.
    1. Botrops
      
      -1
      
      3 October 2026 22: 52
      
      It will. Compare the nuclear potential of Russia and France. France has about 300 nuclear warheads. Russia has 1750 strategic ones for Yars, Sarmat, and other poplar missiles. But that's a gift for the States, if they try anything. And about 6000, according to Sipri, tactical munitions. These are for Hazelnut, Zircon, Dagger, and Iskander missiles. And I think even more, considering the USSR had about 30,000 tactical warheads. My point is that France could bite Russia. Some of the launchers would be shot down by missile defense and air defense systems, some would certainly get through... But for Russia, it wouldn't be fatal. But do I need to tell you what will happen to France next?
      1. VSO-396
        
        0
        
        4 October 2026 22: 02
        
        Well, yeah, let's get revenge on the Frogs for burning Moscow in 1812, and at the same time expose half of Russia to attack? Don't you feel sorry for your children and grandchildren? Or do they live in New Zealand?
        
        Botrops
        
        0
        
        4 October 2026 22: 21
        
        We won't expose half of Russia to attack. The Frogs don't have enough munitions from the Special Warfare Department for that. I don't have any grandchildren yet, and my son is in the Air Defense Forces. But even if I did, I'd give everything for victory. Just as our grandfathers and great-grandfathers gave 29 million lives. And they won.
        
        VSO-396
        
        0
        
        4 October 2026 23: 39
        
        Quote: Botrops
        We won't expose half of Russia to attack. The Frogs don't have enough munitions from the Special Warfare Department for that. I don't have any grandchildren yet, and my son is in the Air Defense Forces. But even if I did, I'd give everything for victory. Just as our grandfathers and great-grandfathers gave 29 million lives. And they won.
        
        Excuse me, are you either drunk now, or... And I wonder if your son is there to win, or is he getting all the benefits he's due? So he's far from being like our grandfathers and great-grandfathers.
        
        Botrops
        
        0
        
        5 October 2026 00: 51
        
        Drunk, excuse me. Our grandfathers and great-grandfathers also received all kinds of allowances during the war, including cash. Did you see that the meeting place couldn't be changed? Where Fox was arrested? Did you notice how many people in uniform were there? Well, even during the war, commercial restaurants were established, which were supplied first-class. Gleb Zheglov gave everyone 100 rubles; with that money, you could buy a cup of coffee. And those who had just returned from the front had enough money to have a good time.
Sergey Mitinsky

+4

1 October 2026 22: 31

Khodaryonok explained everything correctly and clearly, which is why anti-Russian scum have crawled out on this site to comment on his words, including cynically appealing to the memory of the Soviet soldier who defeated fascism.
Remember these accounts. They are enemies of Russian statehood.
The comment was deleted.
1. Botrops
  
  -1
  
  2 October 2026 08: 49
  
  Well, if there's no civilian economy, gas stations will stop working, and to refuel military equipment, we'll have to send tankers to the LBS. And that's always fraught with danger. If all the electric locomotives and traction substations are knocked out, ammunition and equipment won't be able to be delivered by rail to points relatively close to the LBS. "Eating," as you put it, is necessary even on the front lines. And the question is how this will be handled, because food supplies without the railway will also be limited. Without electricity, any production facility will have trouble existing—from a liquor distillery to a Flamingo assembly line. Generators are available, but that means additional fuel consumption.
  With its economy destroyed, Ukraine will be a burden on Europe, which is just as good for us. The bottomless black hole will become even deeper and wider, and Europeans will have to pay more.
  Your brilliant idea is unclear. In my opinion, it's obvious that the more problems Ukraine has in the rear, the more there will be at the front.
AC130 Gunship

-6

1 October 2026 23: 36

Quote: vlad127490
There is only one solution for Ukraine in favor of the Russian people. The state of Ukraine must cease to exist. All of Ukraine's territory, within the 1975 borders, must return to Russia as regions. No one needs to ask permission; everything must be done unilaterally. There is no state, Ukraine, no debts, no Ukrainian government in exile, no legal Banderites, no Ukraine members in various international organizations, no hostile state on the Russian Federation's border. Russia will increase its economic and military-political influence in the world, with direct access to Tiraspol and Chisinau. The northwestern Black Sea will belong to Russia. NATO will no longer be able to use Ukraine against Russia.
Even if part of the state of Ukraine is left, then today and in the future, Russia will always have an enemy in the person of Ukraine. Ukraine will definitely join NATO and will definitely attack Russia. Everything that is promised and will be spelled out in the Constitution of Ukraine, in its documents, Ukraine will change, in the way that is beneficial to the United States and its satellites.
Any half-hearted decision is the defeat and capitulation of the Russian Federation to NATO.

The Balts were driven into the USSR at gunpoint. They gnashed their teeth and waited for their chance. And it arrived. It will be the same here. Love can't be forced...
1. shpakov.alex
  
  0
  
  2 October 2026 06: 24
  
  What's the conclusion? A population that's disloyal, much less aggressive, doesn't need to be re-educated. It needs to be gotten rid of quickly.
  1. VSO-396
    
    0
    
    4 October 2026 22: 10
    
    What's Genghis Khan like? Have you forgotten what century it is? And what's the demographic situation like in Russia?
2. Botrops
  
  +1
  
  2 October 2026 13: 55
  
  Let's start with the fact that after 1918 and until 1940, despite the Empire raising the Baltic states to a level of civilization, they pursued roughly the same policies as they do now. Grinding your teeth? Let me remind you that Stalin returned Vilnius and its environs to them, which had been ceded to Poland in a multi-move maneuver led by Lucjan Zeligowski. He gave them Memel, a city officially listed as Vilnius but in reality a German port. They gave away Pribaltiysky and part of the Curonian Spit. And the mouth of the Neman. Stalin bought the Suwalki Triangle from Adolf Aloizych for his beloved Balts, at the price the Empire received for the sale of Alaska. Part of Belarusian lands went to the Balts. And that's not all. The Baltic Republics were all subsidized and, despite being window dressing, were supported by the RSFSR. So, before we start gnashing our teeth, it would be a good idea to return the lands gifted to them by those damned communists. Otherwise, we'll end up with incomplete decommunization without returning the communist gifts.
  1. PVV22121922
    
    -1
    
    2 October 2026 14: 46
    
    Absolutely right. The Baltics were bought by us and never resold to anyone. Just like the uninhabited steppe of Northern "Kazakhstan," with its sparse nomads, developed and developed by Russia.
Andrey Mishin

+3

2 October 2026 00: 46

I completely agree. He clearly put into words what all the experts already understand. Continue without slowing down. The US elections are in a month, and the most important thing now is to hold out during this time without any foolish ceasefires. There will be intense pressure before the elections, but the situation may change afterward.
1. PVV22121922
  
  0
  
  2 October 2026 14: 47
  
  Press. Press and only press. Russia has no other option.
voron-vr

+1

2 October 2026 02: 54

a unique situation allows us to put pressure on Kyiv

Zelenyukha won't be scared by the loss of Ukraine. Zelenyukha loves money, not Ukraine. They could hire hackers and steal all his money. Then he'd be scared.
Nick. WITH

0

2 October 2026 08: 10

We must continue fighting while we can.

Until they are given something else, we need to press on.
kovaleff

-2

2 October 2026 14: 36

Americans They've been ironing out Iran from planes, and they're still trying to get to the ground. Our "falcons," as I understand it, aren't crossing the LBS yet, and they're not bombing it en masse with iron. It seems they can't handle it with missiles alone; they need orders of magnitude (yes, I know what orders of magnitude means) more. So it's time to get your bonnets in the air.
AC130 Gunship

+1

2 October 2026 18: 29

Quote: shpakov.alex
What's the conclusion? A population that's disloyal, much less aggressive, doesn't need to be re-educated. It needs to be gotten rid of quickly.

One famous politician had already proclaimed such a program sometime after 1933.
1. Vox Populi
  
  -1
  
  2 October 2026 18: 57
  
  These characters have also made more malicious, "programmatic" statements. And yes, they all fit into a well-known pattern (with all the ensuing consequences)...
AC130 Gunship

0

2 October 2026 18: 37

Quote: Botrops
Let's start with the fact that after 1918 and until 1940, despite the Empire raising the Baltic states to a level of civilization, they pursued roughly the same policies as they do now. Grinding your teeth? Let me remind you that Stalin returned Vilnius and its environs to them, which had been ceded to Poland in a multi-move maneuver led by Lucjan Zeligowski. He gave them Memel, a city officially listed as Vilnius but in reality a German port. They gave away Pribaltiysky and part of the Curonian Spit. And the mouth of the Neman. Stalin bought the Suwalki Triangle from Adolf Aloizych for his beloved Balts, at the price the Empire received for the sale of Alaska. Part of Belarusian lands went to the Balts. And that's not all. The Baltic Republics were all subsidized and, despite being window dressing, were supported by the RSFSR. So, before we start gnashing our teeth, it would be a good idea to return the lands gifted to them by those damned communists. Otherwise, we'll end up with incomplete decommunization without returning the communist gifts.

You're losing the thread. What was once a gift from someone is already a gift. And that doesn't lessen the gnashing of teeth. In our army company, there were four or five Balts. When they spoke to us, they winced, as if they'd stepped on a ledge. It's just that in the 1980s, they didn't tell us at school how these three republics "voluntarily" joined the USSR. But their grandfathers told them at home...
AC130 Gunship

+1

2 October 2026 20: 58

Quote: Andrey Mishin
I completely agree. He clearly put into words what all the experts already understand. Continue without slowing down. The US elections are in a month, and the most important thing now is to hold out during this time without any foolish ceasefires. There will be intense pressure before the elections, but the situation may change afterward.

But the "stupid" ones Americans"They don't tailor their foreign policy to the Russian State Duma elections. What's more, many aren't even aware it exists at all ;)
1. Andrey Mishin
  
  0
  
  3 October 2026 14: 23
  
  Americans are stupid, but strong. They can afford it.
kovaleff

0

2 October 2026 21: 03

complete the Second Military Military Service under the Russian Federation's conditions

Russian Federation conditions - this is without Kherson and Zaporizhzhia? Could at least one official voice what these conditions are?
AC130 Gunship

+1

2 October 2026 22: 27

Quote: kovaleff
complete the Second Military Military Service under the Russian Federation's conditions

Russian Federation conditions - this is without Kherson and Zaporizhzhia? Could at least one official voice what these conditions are?

What's the point? The masses will swallow anything. Especially if you repeat to them that "this is right" 20-30 times on the idiot box. And Trump is already "bad" again. A year ago, he was very "good."
Vox Populi

0

3 October 2026 17: 38

Quote: Andrey Mishin
Americans are stupid, but strong. They can afford it.

Don't be fooled, the average American today is roughly equivalent to the average Russian.
1. VSO-396
  
  0
  
  4 October 2026 23: 32
  
  Quote from Vox Populi
  Quote: Andrey Mishin
  Americans are stupid, but strong. They can afford it.
  
  Don't be fooled, the average American today is roughly equivalent to the average Russian.
  
  What do you mean? Physically? Or materially?
  1. Vox Populi
    
    +1
    
    5 October 2026 16: 42
    
    Intellectually and physically, but not materially, because, as propaganda claims, the average Russian lives the wealthiest of all. However, malicious tongues claim they don't live as long as they'd like, and even less than the "decaying Westernoids."