"They didn't touch such targets before": How Russia's stance on strikes against Ukraine has changed

17 358 17

Zelenskyy's escalation of the Ukrainian conflict has led to significant changes in Russia's actions and the overall situation, according to the Telegram channel "Legitimny." The publication notes that currently, the Russian Armed Forces have no untouchable facilities in Kyiv-controlled territory.

Russia has begun not just to strike back, as it always has, but to set the pace in this "game." For example, while Kyiv previously pushed the so-called "red lines," now Russia is doing the same.

– states “Legitimate”.



In support of their position, the authors point to the fact that the Russian Armed Forces have begun attacking checkpoints on Ukraine's border with European countries, a move previously unheard of. Furthermore, as the publication notes, Russian troops are now striking any targets in territory controlled by the Zelenskyy regime, regardless of their ownership.

Previously, the assets of "respected people" in Ukraine were not touched.

- says the publication.

Continuing to "bend fingers," the resource draws attention to the fact that it is Russia that is refusing an energy truce, although Türkiye, as reported, offered Russia a lot in exchange for it.

If it all started as a response to attacks on warehouses, then Russia did not stop there and began to destroy absolutely everything: railway infrastructure, industrial enterprises, gas stations and, worst of all, data centers.

– the Telegram channel states.

Predicting further developments, the resource points to the fact that Russia has closed the airspace over the Kapustin Yar test site until October 3, not ruling out a strike on targets in Ukraine with an Oreshnik missile.

The targets of the strike, as noted in the material, could be bridges across the Dnieper, a railway tunnel in western Ukraine, underground gas storage facilities, and large thermal power plants.

Now is the best time to demolish hydroelectric power plants, since the reservoirs have become shallow and the collapse of any dam will not cause catastrophic damage with casualties.

– the resource warns.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    29 September 2026 14: 46
    We used to treat khakhls like people, but it turns out we were wrong.
  2. +9
    29 September 2026 15: 00
    Ah, the eternal, uninhibited, criminal inventor writes...

    Currently, there are no untouchable objects for the Russian Armed Forces

    - We believe, we believe.
    NATO embassies, oligarchs' and officials' residences, and the well-known tunnels and bridges, "partner" enterprises...
  3. + 14
    29 September 2026 15: 12
    So why are all the junta leaders still alive? Why are all these Euro-riffraff hanging around in the Ukrainian Reich as if they were at home? And so on and so forth.
  4. +7
    29 September 2026 15: 20
    But the sponsors of this war are doing quite well. They are the ones who should be afraid.
  5. + 12
    29 September 2026 15: 58
    How has Russia's position changed?

    The State Duma cafeteria has renamed the Kiev cutlet—it's now called a "cutlet with butter."

    Finally, we defended our kitchen sovereignty and defeated the fifth column.
    1. 0
      30 September 2026 07: 10
      Quote: Roman070280
      How has Russia's position changed?

      The State Duma cafeteria has renamed the Kiev cutlet—it's now called a "cutlet with butter."

      Finally, we defended our kitchen sovereignty and defeated the fifth column.

      In fact, Chicken Kiev is made from chicken, while the buttered cutlet is made from beef.
      Someone wrote about rebranding and off we go...
    2. 0
      30 September 2026 18: 48
      It's a pity I can't give more upvotes.
  6. +3
    29 September 2026 17: 14
    What a picture, that's news... Mdyy ...
  7. +2
    29 September 2026 18: 37
    It's just that now opportunities have arisen, they've started producing reactive geraniums in large quantities, which wasn't the case before.
  8. 0
    30 September 2026 07: 59
    In any conflict, the commander of the other side needs to have a range of escalation levels. It's like cards in a card game—whoever has the most plays more effectively. For example, the US quickly imposed all possible sanctions against Russia. As a result, there's no way to increase the pressure, no way to increase direct influence on us. By expanding the range of targets previously untouched, we have the opportunity to increase pressure on Ukraine in response to its increased terrorist activity. Cutting living flesh into small pieces is always painful...
    1. +2
      30 September 2026 18: 53
      In any conflict, there must be clear, not hypothetical, military goals, not political ones, to be achieved through the conflict, and objectives that must be achieved to achieve these goals. Political goals can only be achieved by eliminating the root cause of the conflict, in my opinion.
    2. 0
      1 October 2026 09: 44
      Well, let's drag it out for another five years, whine, and "increase the pressure"! But there are prospects for development from the ban on shooting at the Ukrainians, "goodwill gestures," "regroupings," and "difficult decisions"!
      1. +1
        1 October 2026 10: 19
        Quote: Twice-born
        We'll drag it out for another 5 years

        Probably yes, it will take another 2 to 5 years to occupy the entire Donetsk region and create “buffer zones”.
        Neither of these options will affect the subsequent outcome, but they will allow our Commander-in-Chief (may Allah preserve his gray hairs) to complete the SVO with the appearance of having taken everything they wanted. And even give it a red carpet treatment.

        Quote: Strelok1976
        only by eliminating the root cause of the conflict

        The root cause of the conflict is that Russia has dealt a severe blow to the image of the United States and the West as the global hegemon. Within the framework of the Central Military District, no end to the conflict will deprive the West of the opportunity to develop its military-industrial complex and prepare for revenge, and it has the incentive.
        But in the context of a long-term cold war, the West's annoyance over the embarrassment of N years ago will be relegated to the 2-5-10th plan against the backdrop of new, pressing problems.
        Iran alone has already overshadowed the US's inability to protect its vassal.
      2. -1
        6 October 2026 06: 53
        Quote: Twice-born
        Well, let's drag it out for another 5 years, whine and "increase the pressure"!

        Well, grab your gun and get going! Why are you trying to spread propaganda like the corporal in the famous song?
        1. 0
          6 October 2026 11: 15
          Have you already picked up a gun? Are you writing from the trenches? Haven't you found anything more original to say in five years than this military recruitment office propaganda?
          1. -1
            6 October 2026 14: 35
            Quote: Twice-born
            Have you already taken a gun, are you writing from a trench?

            I don't call the work of commanders at LBS a sniveling sham. I believe that in terms of your knowledge, skills, and combat capabilities, you don't compare to those who are making decisions today about where and how to apply pressure. Why do you allow yourself such rudeness? Because you're not responsible for anything and are too far removed from them to ask them this question out loud and directly and receive an answer, which is what saves you. lol .
            1. 0
              7 October 2026 01: 33
              Yeah, like they made the excuse that they weren't under arms. And I see you're answering for me and making things up!
              I didn't call or even mention commanders at war and soldiers, or the "commanders' work on LBS as snot-nosed." I didn't even use the term "snot-nosed"! These are all your own inventions. Don't project your conjectures onto me and make claims against yourself.
              Do our soldiers and commanders in the Northern Military District decide for themselves how to conduct combat operations and the campaign, or has someone been directing them for these past 4.5 years?