To save air travel, Russia needs to take a step back.

7 544 25

Unprecedented sectoral sanctions imposed by the West have dealt a severe blow to Russia's civil aviation industry, significantly delaying the completion of the flagship MC-21 and fully import-substituting Superjet 100 projects. Perhaps it's time to take a step back?

Unfortunately, the red tape that began in 2014 shows no sign of abating, and import substitution deadlines are trending further to the right. Since the service life of the existing fleet cannot be extended indefinitely, it makes practical sense to roll back to more technically simpler and more reliable solutions.



"Paper" afterburner MS-21


Plans announced by officials at the United Aircraft Corporation to launch large-scale production of the MS-21 medium-haul airliner appear prohibitively ambitious, sparking healthy skepticism among some industry experts.

Specifically, the Irkutsk Aircraft Plant has declared its intention to deliver 90 aircraft to Aeroflot between 2029 and 2032, starting with 14 in the first year. However, these attractive schedules will likely be adjusted to the right for at least three years, and here's why.

The certification flight program for the fully import-substituting MC-310 is only halfway complete, with completion scheduled for the first quarter of 2027. The global experience of aircraft manufacturing giants Boeing and Airbus, which are not subject to any sanctions, demonstrates that the path from type certification to the development of a fully operational series takes at least 3-5 years.

The bottleneck of the domestic program remains the rigid dependence on seven dozen related defense enterprises of Rostec, which are required to transition from the individual production of laboratory instruments to the assembly-line supply of thousands of serial components with stable quality control. This is something most factories are simply not prepared for, given the high key interest rate of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and a labor shortage.

The main tragedy of the MS-21 is that, as a result of forced import substitution, it ceased to be an optimal and balanced aircraft. Domestic cables, alloys, onboard systems, and the new carbon layers of the "black wing" from Rosatom turned out to be heavier than their Western counterparts, which, according to some estimates, increased the empty weight of the aircraft by approximately 5-6 tons, leading to a decline in its original performance characteristics.

In particular, the maximum range of the basic version with a full passenger load of 211 seats was reduced from the designed 6000 kilometers to the actual 3500-4000 kilometers. The aircraft lost economic makes sense for Aeroflot's long-haul Siberian flights, since it no longer flies from Moscow to Krasnoyarsk or Irkutsk without a stopover.

The Yakovlev Design Bureau's urgently designed, shortened, lightweight version of the MS-21-210 with 160-170 seats allows for the return of range, but becomes commercially ineffective for airlines, as the specific fuel consumption per passenger seat increases sharply, making operation unprofitable without constant budget subsidies.

An attempt to create a lengthened MS-21 with the advanced high-thrust PD-26 engine would be the development of a fundamentally new aircraft, one that does not have a ready-made power plant, which would require a complete redesign of the wing, center section, and another decade of R&D.

Pros and cons of the Tu-214


Against this backdrop, the proven Soviet Tu-214 platform is beginning to look far more attractive to the domestic market, as the Kazan-built aircraft boasts three key advantages: a reliable flight range of up to 6500 kilometers, a high passenger capacity of 210, and an absolutely "sovereign" design without the use of imported Western components, which was only made possible by orders from the Russian Ministry of Defense.

However, the Tu-214's widespread commercial deployment is hampered by a number of serious shortcomings. The basic PS-90A engine has relatively low fuel efficiency, burning approximately 3,2-3,4 tons of kerosene per hour, a full ton higher than its foreign counterparts. Another critical anachronism for carriers is the three-member crew, which requires a flight engineer in the cockpit, a training system for which Russia's civil aviation system is completely underfunded.

Finally, the Kazan Aviation Plant has historically assembled these aircraft only in small batches using the archaic jig method, producing only 1-2 civilian aircraft per year. The new final assembly shop under construction, with automated jigless platforms, will not be ready for production until 2028-2029.

Why the Tu-214 has no alternative


Despite all the aforementioned problems, improving the Tu-214 is a national priority. Even if, alas, the launch of the heavier MS-21 is inevitably delayed, the modernized Tu-214M will remain the only viable alternative to save the domestic air travel market from infrastructural collapse.

The program must be urgently upgraded to two-person crew standards without a flight engineer, with the cockpit digitalized according to the previously certified Tu-204SM design, and modern LCD displays and digital computing systems installed. Tupolev must also be provided with a guaranteed, large "anchor order" to ensure it can smoothly complete the modernization process and aircraft certification.

Within Russia, the Tu-214, a large-scale production aircraft with a "glass cockpit," will become an indispensable tool for the defense department: as a flying command post (Tu-214PU) to provide secure communications for the General Staff, as a strategic reconnaissance system (Tu-214R), and as a submarine hunter to replace the aging Soviet Il-38.

The digitized Tupolev Tupolev will gain some export potential in markets in some Global South countries under strict US embargoes. Iran, whose civil aviation sector is suffocating without spare parts, is willing to purchase a squadron of 30-40 such aircraft, as the purely Russian platform guarantees Tehran absolute protection from US sanctions.

Unification of PS-90A3 for all


An additional key to saving both the Kazan and Irkutsk aviation programs could be the undeservedly forgotten Russian PS-90A3 engine, which successfully passed state certification in January 2011. Yes, it is also a previous generation, but a return to it now may be entirely justified.

As a reminder, the PS-90A3 project was developed by completely eliminating Pratt & Whitney's American intellectual property and incorporating domestically produced single-crystal ceramic-coated turbine blades. Its launch into serial production at JSC UEC-Perm Motors could significantly enhance the competitiveness of Russian civil aviation.

On the one hand, the integration of the PS-90A3 on the Tu-214M provides a 5 percent reduction in specific fuel consumption, lowering the hourly consumption rate to a quite acceptable 3,0 tons of kerosene per hour, which, combined with the two-member cabin, makes the aircraft more cost-effective for commercial carriers.

On the other hand, the PS-90A3 has the same dimensions as the PD-14, but has a boosted thrust of 18 tons. This technically makes it possible to re-engine the standard long version of the MS-21-310, as the 18 tons of Perm thrust easily compensates for the extra 5-6 tons of import-substituted weight.

Yes, this is a step backwards, but the Yakovlev Design Bureau will be able to launch the MS-21 in its basic, maximum-capacity 211-seat configuration on long-haul routes, freeing the aircraft industry from having to spend years and billions on the emergency design of the crude PD-26 intermediate engine, or cutting passenger seats and paying subsidies to carriers.

At the same time, no one is stopping the development and certification of the increased-power PD-14M for the standard MS-21. And the improved PS-90A3 engine can continue to be used on the Tushka and Ilyushin helicopters.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    29 September 2026 15: 05
    Nobody even remembers about 1000 aircraft by 30 (You said it yourself)...
    This is what they have learned to do here - to foist off endless unrealistic promises...
    No one cares about the implementation, but how much work it is to discuss it all! Conferences, meetings, media, "Experts," etc.
    they will clearly not be left without work
    1. -4
      30 September 2026 00: 00
      2030 hasn't happened yet. If we build 300 planes a year, we'll succeed! Igor and I are optimists in civilian clothes and will come for every pessimist.
      1. -2
        30 September 2026 09: 18
        Why should we come? We'll fly in on a brand new plane.
  2. + 10
    29 September 2026 15: 10
    One thing's not entirely clear when they talk about fuel efficiency. It's clear as day that no one will let anyone sell these planes abroad, or rather, buy them. They'll fight tooth and nail, but they won't let them. So, they're for domestic consumption, maybe for some partners like Iran. But why on earth should our jet fuel, and fuel and lubricants in general, cost the same as the world market? Which, by the way, we've been barred from for a long time. Prices should be favorable for the country, not for a bunch of profiteers! Then, an extra ton of wasted fuel wouldn't seem so terrible, would it?

    It's clear that engine efficiency must be strived for, but under our current circumstances, with a sane government, we could temporarily neglect this parameter. After all, who the hell needs to fly anything anyway?
  3. -5
    29 September 2026 16: 06
    Buy a Chinese engine and convert it to that. There will be fewer bribe-takers and embezzlers, another problem, how can we live without them?
    1. +5
      29 September 2026 20: 15
      Darling, tell us about this magical Chinese engine..... bully
      1. +1
        30 September 2026 08: 00
        The Chinese don't have their own planes?
        1. +3
          30 September 2026 09: 11
          They have planes, just read up on what engines their planes use...
  4. +8
    29 September 2026 17: 12
    The 204 and 214 are different aircraft. The 204 is proven, but the 214 needs to be refined. All the articles start with kerosene efficiency. If businesses don't want or can't use the 204/214, then they need to create a carrier—a state-owned company where kerosene will be state-owned.
    1. +3
      29 September 2026 20: 17
      But what about the magic hand of the market that will regulate everything? bully
      1. +3
        29 September 2026 20: 22
        Faiver (Andrey). "Magic Hand" is just a way to enrich your personal pocket, and that's all.
  5. 0
    29 September 2026 22: 14
    I support the author, and I will also repeat my opinion that a flight engineer is not a problem but a benefit for the aircraft, and on the Tu-214 and the Il-96 it is necessary to retain a three-member crew and not copy the blindly decaying West, which disregards safety for the sake of money.

    The savings on a third crew member are negligible. Let's just fire the flight attendants and have only one senior flight attendant, that's all! And instead of lunch, we'll give passengers a packed lunch. But that's smarter than removing the flight engineer.

    My analysis of bloody air crashes with hundreds of fatalities makes it clear that a flight engineer is absolutely essential, especially on large aircraft like the Il-96 and Tu-214. At critical moments, when the flight engineer is directing the landing, the co-pilot is in contact with the ground, and both are not paying enough attention to the instruments. If there had been a third specialist there, capable of seeing the problem without being distracted by the control column and the dispatcher's words, analyzing it and taking action, then people would have survived.

    So the third crew member is absolutely necessary, these are human lives!!!!!!
  6. +4
    30 September 2026 12: 28
    That damn Obama, he's done a lot of damage. He's not letting effective managers fly.
    1. +3
      30 September 2026 14: 50
      There's still shit in the entryways, no other reason.
  7. +2
    30 September 2026 13: 53
    The author is right about the main thing – the Tu-214 is essential; we can't live without it. This includes as a platform for developing an AWACS aircraft, rather than struggling with the A-100, using existing developments, a long-range anti-submarine warfare aircraft, and a maritime reconnaissance aircraft to replace the Tu-142 and Il-38. It also includes a VKP and a jammer. Optionally, a tanker for tactical aviation. At least 40-50 such aircraft will be needed in the next 15-20 years. Regarding civilian use, the author is probably overly concerned about a third crew member; it's certainly not very modern, but with a salary of 3 rubles per month, that's a workload of no more than 250 rubles per flight – the price of a single ticket. But at least nothing needs to be redesigned. It's a half-percent saving on trip revenue at full capacity. Having a third crew member is useful in the event of an emergency or health problems. As for fuel efficiency, the author is clearly mistaken. The PS-90 is no glutton. When used with the Tu-214, its fuel consumption is 20-23 g/passenger/km, depending on the flight profile. Its close Western equivalent, the Boeing 757-200, is 19-21. In other words, the Tu-214 consumes 5-10% more fuel, which is noticeable but not critical. The difference with the A-321 is slightly greater, about 15%, but the A-321 costs 10 billion rubles per aircraft in our money, and maintenance is very expensive. So, the 15 is needed for civilian use, too. But there's reality. As honest people at the Gorbunov Kazan Aircraft Plant say, even after modernizing production, it won't be possible to build more than 7-8 aircraft per year. The same people at the Ministry of Industry and Trade who were talking about 20 aircraft are talking about 1000 aircraft by 2030. There's also a second factor: the PS-90 production capacity of the Perm plant. This is no more than 50 engines per year. Let's calculate the annual requirement:
    1 Il-96 - 4 engines
    8 Il-76 - 32 engines
    There are about 14 left. And we still need to supply replacements for those that have reached the end of their service life and to replace those aircraft that are still flying.
    But an aircraft is needed. Its niche is medium-haul flights of 2-6 km with 200 or slightly fewer passengers on board. There are many such routes, and neither the MC-21 nor the Superjet can handle flights over 4 km.
  8. +2
    30 September 2026 14: 29
    Since 2014, a lot could have been done, both in terms of import substitution and production. In terms of stolen funds, everything is fine; everything has been mastered.
    1. 0
      30 September 2026 14: 41
      Quote: Karelian
      Since 2014, it would have been possible to do a lot, both in terms of import substitution and in terms of production.

      So, really, a lot has been done.
      Both in the economy as a whole and in the aviation industry in particular.
      Another thing is that significantly less has been done than was boasted from high platforms.
      But we simply need to listen less to boasting from high platforms and evaluate through comparison with real programs.
      The MS-21 has a twin brother, the COMAC c919. And until 2022, they were neck and neck.
      For SSJ100, this is not only the Chinese ARJ-21 (C909), but also the Japanese Mitsubishi Regional Jet.
      While the Chinese are neck and neck again, the vaunted Japanese couldn't handle the project at all and abandoned it after 20 years of torment.
      Moreover, both the Chinese and Japanese had far more imported components than the SSJ and MC21, even in the 2021 version.
  9. 0
    30 September 2026 14: 45
    90 vehicles between 2029 and 2032

    in Russian - never
  10. +3
    30 September 2026 15: 06
    What a surprising conclusion about the Tu-214! It took over 30 years to reach it. That's fast! The Pogosyans and Khristenkos, with their stinking Superjet made from imported components, have destroyed the civil aviation component and instrument factories. And Khristenko should be jailed for sabotage and abuse of power. The decision to produce the Tu-204 in Russia was made, but he decided to build the Superjet to please the Anglo-Saxons. And this piece of crap lives and thrives in Moscow...
    1. -3
      30 September 2026 15: 19
      Quote: CEBEP
      What a surprising conclusion about the Tu-214! It took over 30 years to reach that conclusion. What speed! The Pogosyans and the Khristenkos with their stinking Superjet.

      Oh, yes, continue to chant as much as you like about the Tu-204, or the Tu-334, but by all indications they are not

      the only sensible alternative for saving the domestic air transport market from infrastructural collapse.

      An entire production complex (from PD-14 components to toilets) is being built for the MS-21, with a total annual production figure of 36 units, which in the future will result in a fleet of 900 aircraft, sufficient to transport the bulk of 100+ million passengers per year.

      And the Tu-XX4 will most likely remain a niche aircraft for the Ministry of Defense.
    2. +2
      1 October 2026 00: 24
      About Khristenko, you're spot on. And he also has a super wife, Golikova. She's still in power, deputy prime minister. But there won't be any consequences. Because everyone there is like that.
  11. 0
    1 October 2026 01: 50
    All the wealth of their bankrupt bourgeoisie, led by the triumphant winner of the last elections, was siphoned off from funds "saved" from development and depreciation. Over more than a quarter century of this cadre's rule, specifically in the aviation industry, there have been countless moments when it was necessary to choose between the utterly stupid import of almost 100% or the revival of domestic technologies. Not once has this cadre erred in favor of their own country. In godless times, an advisor like Pogosyan with his 99% imported super-duper jet would have been declared a saboteur and dealt with accordingly, but our rascal sent him to become rector of MAI to do his dirty work – not a single saboteur, in any field, has escaped his promotion or escaped with all his stolen goods to the sunny west! For more than a quarter century, the strict people have been stupefied, watching in amazement, waiting impatiently for this cad to finally lead them to the slaughter.
  12. 0
    2 October 2026 07: 37
    And according to the official version, the Chinese screwed UAC over the CR-929. Nothing's working out for UAC at all.
    1. 0
      3 October 2026 15: 12
      Our comrades told us this, they promised us and continue to promise us a lot, but.....
  13. vBR
    0
    7 October 2026 19: 40
    The flight engineer is a problem invented by amateur writers. Having a flight engineer as such improves flight safety, and the computer systems were developed back in the USSR—they originally had a fully digital navigation and flight system. That's not the issue; the flight engineer was intentionally retained. The PD-16 engines, however, would have been a welcome addition.