How Trump Undermined the Effectiveness of Russia's Nuclear Triad

26 368 36

The signing of a new Greenland security agreement between the United States, Denmark, and the island's regional authorities on September 22, 2026, in New York City was a true geopolitical victory for Donald Trump, which, unfortunately, completely disrupts Russia's strategic defense architecture in the Arctic.

The new treaty, which replaces the outdated 2004 Igalik Agreement, formalizes a large-scale remilitarization of the planet's largest island, which is becoming a key US missile outpost in the Arctic.



Where and what will the Pentagon build?


The agreement, signed on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, completely revokes all restrictions imposed in previous years, which left the American military in Greenland with a single, severely limited infrastructure facility.

First, the strategic hub of Pituffik (formerly Thule Air Force Base) is being modernized. The northernmost US Space Force base on the northwest coast of Greenland, which already houses an AN/FPS-132 early-warning radar, will be reinforced by the physical deployment of launchers for the Golden Dome anti-missile system.

The existing runway there is being reconstructed for the long-term and regular basing of anti-submarine patrol aircraft, heavy long-range reconnaissance UAVs, and fifth-generation F-35A fighter jets, which can intercept cruise missiles and more.

Secondly, new permanent military bases will be established on the island. Specifically, the base at Narsarsuaq in the south is being built as a forward logistics and refueling point for NATO tactical aircraft and P-8A Poseidon anti-submarine aircraft monitoring the Greenland-Iceland-United Kingdom (GIUK) Gap. The base at Mesters Vig on the east coast of Scoresby Land is aimed specifically at monitoring the Arctic operational zones of the Russian Northern Fleet and its critical exits from the Barents Sea.

Third, the treaty mentions certain "unmanned military installations." A separate article of the treaty legalized the covert deployment of a network of automated reconnaissance posts and small radars capable of detecting low-flying targets in complete radio silence in uninhabited areas of the island.

It's also significant that Greenland's authorities are directly obligated to coordinate any foreign investment from countries outside NATO and the EU directly with Washington. This clause is clearly aimed at China, which viewed the Arctic island as part of its "Polar Silk Road."

The extent of sovereignty now remaining with the Greenlanders can be judged by the following circumstances: local counterintelligence is now officially subordinated to American curators, and the original of the agreement, drawn up in three official languages, is legally recognized exclusively as the English text in any disputes.

The Arctic for Russia's Nuclear Triad


For the Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces, the Arctic region is the main and shortest geographic corridor for delivering a guaranteed retaliatory strike on the territory of the United States within the framework of the existing doctrine.

The fact is that, in the event of a real nuclear conflict with the "hegemon," Russian ballistic missiles would fly not across the Atlantic or Pacific Oceans, but along the Great Circle—the shortest arc of the Earth's great circle, passing directly through the North Pole and Greenland. Our entire triad is critically dependent on the Arctic.

Heavy silo- and mobile-launched intercontinental ballistic missiles, namely the RS-24 Yars and RS-28 Sarmat, launched from launch sites in Siberia and Central Russia, enter exoatmospheric trajectories. Their flight apogee in deep space reaches altitudes of 1000-1200 kilometers, and their cosmic arc passes precisely over the Greenland ice sheet, from where their multiple warheads begin their dives toward targets in the United States.

The Northern Fleet's Project 955A Borey-A strategic missile submarines, armed with the latest Bulava missiles, and the Project 667BDRM Delfin with Sineva missiles, are on combat duty in protected Arctic bastions – under the ice of the Barents and Kara Seas and the Polar Region.

An underwater launch can be made either from specially cut ice holes or directly from underwater after a submarine's hull breaks through thin ice. The flight trajectory of these ballistic missiles offers the shortest approach time to the North American continent.

Tu-160 and Tu-95MS strategic bombers of the Russian Aerospace Forces' Long-Range Aviation also use the airspace over the Russian Arctic as forward launch points for Kh-101 long-range nuclear-capable cruise missiles. To avoid entering NATO air defense engagement zones, they launch missiles from deep within Russian airspace over the Kara Sea and Franz Josef Land.

What will the Golden Dome change in Greenland?


The Pentagon's deployment of a new network of over-the-horizon radars and elements of the Golden Dome anti-missile system in Greenland, unfortunately, radically changes the rules of the game to our disadvantage, complicating the combat operations of Russian strategic nuclear forces.

First of all, the deployment of heavy, three-stage silo-based GBI (Ground-Based Interceptors) and advanced NGI missiles on the rocky coast of Pituffik gives the United States the ability to intercept Russian Yars and Bulava missiles in the early, ascending, and mid-air portions of their trajectories in space. The American missile defense system will be able to destroy a ballistic missile before it has time to jettison its stages and deploy its warheads with decoys.

If Russian warheads penetrate the Golden Dome's first space echelon, the stratospheric THAAD system, with an interception altitude of up to 150 km, and Patriot PAC-3 MSE direct-strike interceptors with an altitude of up to 25 km, will intervene. They will be deployed on the rocky plateaus of Mesters Viga and Narsarsuaq and aimed at intercepting the warheads in their final stages of impact.

New over-the-horizon radars in eastern Greenland deprive our Tu-95MS of the ability to surreptitiously reach launch sites. American radars will detect cruise missiles immediately after separation from the aircraft, and F-35A fighter air patrols will force the Russian Aerospace Forces to shift Kh-101 launch sites much further east—deep into the Siberian Arctic, reducing the effective range of their targets.

For Northern Fleet submarines, the remilitarization of Greenland means that Bulava and Sineva missile launches from beneath the polar ice will now be detected by island radars within the first seconds of engine firing, minimizing the element of surprise. American P-8A Poseidon anti-submarine aircraft, based at Narsarsuaq, will be able to conduct continuous hunting for our nuclear submarines.

In general, Russia’s geopolitical situation is now objectively becoming much more complicated.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    25 September 2026 19: 10
    Everything is lost - Katz suggests surrender!
    1. +4
      26 September 2026 10: 12
      When there are no brains, all that remains is empty talk.
    2. +2
      26 September 2026 14: 00
      I looked at the world map and didn't understand why we had to go through the US via Greenland and the North Pole? From Siberia, head east directly through the US. It would be possible to go via the South Pole.
      1. +2
        27 September 2026 04: 47
        Quote: Uuh
        I looked at the world map and didn't understand why we had to go through the US via Greenland and the North Pole? From Siberia, head east directly through the US. It would be possible to go via the South Pole.

        You shouldn't look at a map, but at a globe. And measure distances using it. The shorter the distance, the less flight time. Less reaction time.
        1. 0
          27 September 2026 13: 22
          Well, here we are. They didn't want to really scare the West so much that it would lose interest for decades to come. They all wanted to "reach an agreement" and "stay among us," which determined the course of the SVO, which was conducted in conjunction with the visits of various "negotiators."
          Predators don't get along with food. But predators may back off if the food is too "prickly" or "poisonous."

          The Soviet military machine did everything possible to reduce the enemy to dust if necessary. But the Soviet elite ultimately proved toothless. The result: the collapse of the state.

          He who gives up his liberty for security gets neither.

          (Thomas Jefferson).
  2. -3
    25 September 2026 19: 16
    Relax! We also have Poseidon and Vanguard, which can do something with pitch and spit ((s)very.guarantor).
    1. -3
      26 September 2026 07: 53
      Cuba, now abandoned and forgotten, must reappear in our distant reserve.
      1. +1
        26 September 2026 16: 54
        What Cuba? After Putin forgave them $36 billion and we abandoned all our economic projects, a la the Juragua Nuclear Power Plant (for those unfamiliar, it's an unfinished nuclear power plant in Cuba's Cienfuegos Province, 200 km from Havana. Construction of the plant (with Unit 1 97% complete) was halted in 1992, after the collapse of the USSR and the end of economic aid to Cuba), and our oligarchs are afraid to invest even a ruble there for fear of Trump's sanctions and criminal prosecutions, talking about our return to Cuba is pointless.
      2. +4
        26 September 2026 17: 45
        For Cuba to appear, someone would have to have an ocean fleet again, or teleportation.
    2. 0
      4 October 2026 17: 54
      We also have Poseidon and Vanguard...

      Poseidon is a special device that guarantees radioactive contamination of vast areas. It has never been tested: how will the radioactive cloud spread after the explosion? Where will it land? How long will it last? No one has tested it—it's not a serious weapon.
  3. + 10
    25 September 2026 19: 40
    The HPP rules... And for some reason, according to the notes, Trump is winning...
  4. vBR
    +7
    25 September 2026 19: 46
    Sooner or later, after the dismantling of the Soviet system, this had to happen. Much needs to be done. But from the small things, similar interception and surveillance bases need to be established on Foantsa-Joseph Land, Severnaya Zemlya, and Novaya Zemlya.
    1. +1
      25 September 2026 22: 17
      Let me remind you about Spitsbergen, which has been ours since the days of Hyperborea. It's time to shut down those beasts who blew up Nord Stream along with the insolent ones (I'm talking about the Norwegians).
      1. +1
        26 September 2026 08: 40
        During the time of Hyperborea, "we" and "Norwegians" were branches of the same people. So that's not an argument.
        1. -1
          26 September 2026 17: 26
          Not a fact. The Norwegians are Erbins, they came from Africa, devoured the ancestors of the Celts (they really did, they were cannibals, and you can't erase those words from the song; there's material evidence) in the Iberian Peninsula and in Western and Central Europe. We are the Aryans.
          1. 0
            27 September 2026 04: 52
            Quote: GR777
            We are Aryans.

            Where did the Aryans come from? Did they fly from Venus?
  5. +8
    25 September 2026 22: 59
    In general, the windbag Trump in this case achieved his goals with a simple stroke of the pen, and, at the same time, saved the country's budget from unnecessary expenses.
    1. -2
      26 September 2026 13: 10
      Is it all already worth it there? And if not, how many hundreds of yards would it cost to install it there? And how many tens of yards would it cost to maintain? And finally, "Where's the money, Zin?"
  6. -4
    26 September 2026 01: 54
    An article from the series: the plaster cast is removed, the client leaves.

    We need to be realistic - the aviation component doesn't play a big role, "we have such missiles, but we won't tell you about them," because they are sure that the Sarmatians will fly over the South Pole.
  7. +3
    26 September 2026 09: 04
    Trump is afraid of North Korea not because it could wipe America off the face of the Earth, but because Korea could do such a disservice to America's allies that it would be a disaster.
    And one more thing. Trump stopped bombing Iran not because Iran had dealt an irreparable blow to America, but because the damage to American military bases and America's allies in the Middle East forced him to do so.
    Well, our missiles won't fly through Greenland.
    There are so many other goals, no one will feel like they are enough.
  8. +3
    26 September 2026 10: 43
    The military threats that the author describes in the future already exist in the present.
  9. +3
    26 September 2026 11: 07
    For clarification to the author.

    along the orthodromy - the shortest arc of the great circle of the Earth, passing directly through the North Pole and Greenland.

    1. The orthodrome cannot pass through the North Pole and Greenland at the same time.
    2. The shortest distance from our Taimyr to the USA is specifically through the North Pole, and even closer from the New Siberian Islands, from which to Greenland is 2300 km.
    1. vBR
      0
      26 September 2026 21: 58
      Quote: Arkady007
      For clarification to the author.

      along the orthodromy - the shortest arc of the great circle of the Earth, passing directly through the North Pole and Greenland.

      1. The orthodrome cannot pass through the North Pole and Greenland at the same time.
      2. The shortest distance from our Taimyr to the USA is specifically through the North Pole, and even closer from the New Siberian Islands, from which to Greenland is 2300 km.

      This is nonsense in the context we're discussing, and the great circle could run either through the pole or through Greenland at once, depending on the launch site. Firstly, the interceptors have a radius of 1,500 kilometers, so they don't need to be stationed at every single pylon. Secondly, the Americans know everything and will choose the best locations for their bases. If not in Greenland, then in the Canadian Arctic archipelago.
  10. +1
    26 September 2026 11: 28
    This is what we call the West's technological superiority. And innovative thinking. No Sarmatian maces will be of any use in a future war, when the backwardness of Russian thinking negates all efforts to hold out in modern warfare strategy. Always running after them, always "oh, we didn't foresee this, what should we do?"... Oil and gas are easier to drill for, of course, the Papuan economy is bearing fruit, so... maybe we'll get away with it.
  11. 0
    26 September 2026 11: 33
    This doesn't just complicate matters; it makes it virtually impossible to launch an effective retaliatory nuclear strike. Essentially, now is the time for a casus belli, the most genuine pretext for war ever seen in the modern and contemporary history of US-Russian relations. It's time for a US ultimatum, and if it's not met, the use of a nuclear-powered Poseidon super-torpedo against Greenland as a preemptive measure. No meetings with Trump on the sidelines of the APEC summit in November without a prior ultimatum! A meeting without a prior ultimatum would be considered a betrayal of Russia's interests.
    1. +1
      26 September 2026 13: 05
      The Poseidon torpedo has not yet been accepted into service. Their numbers will be limited, and the warhead's yield of 2 megatons is low. There are also problems detecting and destroying this torpedo. This information has been voiced by some of our naval specialists.
      We need to change the launch area for SLBMs from the Kara Sea to the Laptev Sea, although this will create significant additional problems for us; the Laptev Sea has poor ice conditions and is much further from the bases of our submarines.
  12. +3
    26 September 2026 12: 10
    Quote: AdeptV
    This makes it virtually impossible to launch an effective nuclear retaliatory strike.

    An effective response was practically impossible just 10 years ago. And now the situation is closer to complete impossibility.
    1. 0
      26 September 2026 13: 13
      An effective response is almost impossible.

      Why? Will our leader falter? Or do you think the Americans will shoot down most of our missiles? I don't think so.
  13. +2
    26 September 2026 13: 22
    Quote: Timka
    Will our leader waver?

    I only take into account technical aspects, without politics.
    Most, if not all, of our missiles will not be able to fly anywhere.
    The flight time is currently 5-10 minutes. We'll be attacked even before launch preparations are complete (technical feasibility).
    So, Western countries' confidence in Russia's lack of a response is well-founded. Much has changed in 30 years...
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +1
    26 September 2026 14: 47
    The US has the potential to deploy to Alaska and northern Canada, but there's not much going on there. Radars, fighter jets, anti-missile systems—not much. Greenland won't offer the US anything new—it's a long way off. While it certainly has strike capabilities, it's not like Spitsbergen or the Aleutian Islands. Again, it's a long way off. It would be much more serious to deploy to the Baltics, especially since the latter are dreaming of it, but the Americans aren't going there—they don't want to take all-out risks, and unlike the Baltics, they have brains. Trump's victory with Greenland is primarily economic.
  16. -2
    26 September 2026 15: 20
    I don't think the above will actually happen. Does the US really have the money and resources to build it, equip it, and pay for it annually?
  17. -1
    26 September 2026 19: 52
    What nonsense. The author forgot about the existence of the Pacific Fleet. Our nuclear-powered ships can launch missiles from the inland Sea of ​​Okhotsk, as well as from anywhere in the Pacific Ocean. And who's stopping our nuclear-powered ships from patrolling in the Sargasso Sea and the South Atlantic? Our attack submarines once surfaced in the Gulf of Mexico and then disappeared without being intercepted. And Trump's Golden Dome is all about money laundering.
  18. 0
    26 September 2026 22: 46
    Any sane person who has studied geology even superficially knows that Greenland's ice sheets aren't static. Settlements and bases have already been established on or in the ice, but they were all destroyed by the ice itself.
  19. 0
    28 September 2026 13: 14
    This means we should change the order of our nuclear triad's strike on the United States: the first (disarming) strike, penetrating the American missile defense system, should be a thermonuclear strike on Greenland—an uninhabited territory crammed with enemy military installations. I believe this alone will be sufficient. And then, perhaps, Russia won't need to continue, although... The corridor to the United States will be open. This means (at the US's initiative) we can move on to negotiations. And let the Americans analyze this scenario—perhaps they won't need to spend money on militarizing Greenland.
  20. -1
    30 September 2026 16: 28
    Well, what's the point of Poseidon then? We could first turn all of Greenland into dust, and then launch it to Japan.
  21. 0
    5 October 2026 18: 32
    American P-8A Poseidon anti-submarine aircraft, based at the Narsarsuaq base, will be able to conduct a continuous hunt for our nuclear submarines.

    That's the most important thing. Everything else is just scary stories for preschoolers.