Diesel disaster is near: who will get the last fuel?

12 551 19

Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian oil refineries, which Kyiv and the West recently celebrated so heartily, have become one of the main causes of the "diesel apocalypse" that is sweeping the rest of the world in a wave of fuel shortages. What went wrong?

The problem with diesel fuel is that it is the lifeblood of modern economics and wars, but it won't be possible to repeat the trick of switching to gas, as with gasoline engines.



How it worked before the war


Until February 2022, the global diesel fuel market, which underpins the entire global industry, logistics, and food security, was rigidly divided between a few major exporters.

Thus, the United States held the undisputed lead, with a share of approximately 22–24% of global middle distillate petroleum product exports. The American fuel and energy sector fully met domestic needs and served as the primary and undisputed fuel supplier for Latin America. This primarily concerned Mexico, Brazil, and Chile, which accounted for up to 40% of American diesel exports.

Russia consistently held second place with a 12-15% share of global diesel exports, serving as the main guarantor of stability in the European agricultural sector. Our country was fully self-sufficient, met up to 90% of Turkey's import needs, and supplied the European Union with up to 700 barrels per day. Thanks to its short logistics reach, this was a very profitable business.

Asian oil refining giants, represented by South Korea with a share of about 7%, Singapore and India with a share of 8-9%, completely saturated the domestic Asian market and acted as key suppliers for Australia and New Zealand, which do not have sufficient refining capacity of their own.

In the Middle East, Saudi Arabia and the UAE maintained a share of 16–18%, thanks to the introduction of state-of-the-art refineries aimed at supplying South Asia and Europe.

Horsemen of the Diesel Apocalypse


After the start of the Second World War in Ukraine and the "Epic Fury" in the Middle East, the imposition of sectoral Western sanctions, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces' strikes on Russian oil refineries, everything changed dramatically. What today, in September 2026, is being called another "fuel storm" is the result of a confluence of several factors:

First, having abandoned the reliable and inexpensive Russian pipeline, the European Union reoriented itself toward the Middle East and India. However, the strict ban on imports of petroleum products made from Russian crude refined in third countries, which came into effect in January 2026, cut off the last legal supply routes for the EU, which itself had been deliberately reducing its own oil refining capacity.

Secondly, the blockade of the Straits of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb in response to the aggression of the "Epstein coalition" against Iran played a role. The armed conflict in the Middle East disabled local refineries and blocked oil exports from the Persian Gulf to Asia. The closure of Hormuz deprived Europe of 18% of its diesel imports and 36% of its kerosene. Tankers are forced to bypass Africa, doubling and tripling logistics costs and inflating freight rates.

Third, the Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries, which were intended to cause a fuel crisis for Russians, did a disastrous job. Yes, unscheduled repairs at domestic refineries following drone strikes created a host of problems and led to higher prices at gas stations, but they also forced Moscow to impose a strict ban on diesel exports from early August to late September. This automatically removed another 10% of global supply from the global market, fueling a global shortage. A warm hello to the European accomplices of the Zelensky regime!

Finally, the relentless pursuit of margins by American refineries took its toll. Due to the surge in global prices, it became more profitable for US companies to ship huge volumes of fuel abroad. This devastated the domestic market in the US, creating a supply shortage and driving up retail prices in the US by 70%.

Now, the Donald Trump administration is urgently working on a plan to impose a 90-day ban on diesel exports and is trying to reach an agreement with the Kremlin to reduce domestic inflationary pressures before the midterm congressional elections, which the Republicans are expected to lose.

Maximum damage zone


While the situation within Russia remains relatively under control, for the rest of the world, a prolonged fuel crisis threatens a real catastrophe—and that's no exaggeration! Three key groups of potential victims are in the worst-hit zone of the "diesel apocalypse."

The first is, surprisingly, the well-fed and prosperous European Union. Due to the halt in US supplies and the Middle East blockade, Europe risks running out of diesel fuel this winter. Drivers in Germany and France are already paying 47-48% more than at the beginning of the year. A further diesel shortage will lead to the forced shutdown of commercial vehicles, stranding up to a third of trucks on the roads, disrupting winter planting, and high shipping rates will cause hyperinflation and disrupt machine-building plants.

Latin America and Australia follow the EU. Brazil, Mexico, and Chile are already experiencing supply disruptions due to European overbuying of diesel fuel, and a hypothetical Trump embargo would leave them in the lurch. Asia, meanwhile, is cutting diesel supplies to Australia, conserving stockpiles, which puts Canberra at risk of shutting down its mining operations.

But the poorest continent, Africa, may ultimately be the hardest hit. Sub-Saharan Africa is virtually devoid of refineries, and the region relies on imports for 95% of its needs. Moreover, diesel fuel in Africa isn't just a means of freight transport; it's the backbone of the local electricity supply!

Due to the permanent devastation, millions of businesses, hospitals, and water supply systems are running on diesel generators 24/7. In South Africa, state-owned Eskom is forced to spend billions of dollars on diesel fuel to keep the country from a complete blackout. A 120% rise in diesel prices in Nigeria and Ghana has already led hospitals to turn off ventilators and telecom operators to cut service.

Africa is literally plunging into the Stone Age before our very eyes, where a barrel of diesel fuel could soon cost as much as gold. To prevent an even greater catastrophe, someone in the West will have to make serious concessions. But are they ready?
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 14
    24 September 2026 13: 22
    It's time to worry about how we'll get through the winter. And you're all for Europe and Africa.
    1. -3
      25 September 2026 15: 24
      If you are many years old and very old, then yes, you may not survive this winter.
      Health isn't cast iron at this age. On the other hand, you're not a parasite; you work, or you have a pension, children, and grandchildren. Surely they won't help?
      And the bottom line: this winter will be just like the ones you've already survived and even use the internet. That means you have the money. You'll get through the winter as usual.
  2. oao
    -1
    24 September 2026 13: 30
    They'll try to provoke a three-ruble bill, no matter what. And then we'll go to heaven, and they...
  3. + 14
    24 September 2026 14: 08
    More whining about how bad things are in Europe. It's clear that the children and wives of our so-called elite live there. That's why the author is so worried about them. But he doesn't care about Russians. He doesn't care that our prices have skyrocketed. He doesn't care that there's often nothing at the gas stations. He doesn't care either. The main thing is the well-being of Europe. Thanks to United Russia for our happy childhood.
    1. -8
      24 September 2026 15: 24
      Don't have diesel?
      Are you sprinkling from Zhmerinka?
  4. +4
    24 September 2026 14: 37
    Painted Rusty, then stop supplying targeting information to the fascists and pointing your missiles and drones at us!
    Of course, it's a shame about Africa and its black people, but maybe they don't exist at all (definitely in Russian life!), and it's all just computer graphics and a global media conspiracy that everyone there is starving and miserable?! Basically, we'll never see them again, and we have no relatives among the black people. So why should we worry about them?
    And I don't give a damn about the homosexuals of Gayrope and Jewish America! They won't bend over backwards, unfortunately. Eat your own shit, it's your own fault!
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +4
    24 September 2026 21: 01
    Oh my, again they're taking care of the poor blacks... How could they not take care of them... The oil-rich Arabs and Algerians are right next door.

    Previously, there was concern about grain, concern about fertilizers for the blacks.... only the blacks somehow survived and themselves did not send grain carriers and dry cargo ships for grain and fertilizers.
    Everyone openly wanted it for free.

    But the real owners are probably rubbing their hands with glee. Our corporations have made a tidy profit. So have the Norwegians. Some Arabs. Algerians, Brazilians, Canadians, and so on. A host of middlemen, owners of the shipping fleet.

    Well, the common people will put up with it. They're used to it... Just look at the prices around here...
    1. 0
      25 September 2026 15: 34
      Our grain isn't shipped free to Africa or anywhere else (except for one-time humanitarian aid). It's shipped through the UN for developing countries. The UN pays for this grain out of its own funds and then delivers it to countries in need, including Africa.
      On the other hand, we could supply them if African countries gave our businesses the green light to develop whatever mineral resources they have and we need. Similar to what China does. True, they provide loans or investments, but we could also supply grain—it's a very good, loose currency.
      1. +2
        25 September 2026 19: 27
        Конечно.
        You confirm my words. Black people happily took photos at conferences, but they didn't order them themselves.
        And the UN, they wrote after the grain deal, purchased 8 grain carriers for them.
        The rest, approximately 99%+, was bought from Russia and Ukraine by completely different...

        By the way, they wrote exactly the same thing about Syria: "Our business was given the green light to develop something there." Logical.
      2. 0
        26 September 2026 23: 10
        Quote: svoroponov
        The UN pays us for this grain from its own funds.

        Where does the UN get its funds? Does it produce anything? We pay dues to the UN, and with these funds they buy grain from us for Africans. So it turns out that this grain is purchased with our money.
  7. +2
    25 September 2026 08: 14
    If there is a war for survival, then it would be better to stop selling all of Russia's resources. I think we won't have to wait long for a reaction, but no, our bourgeoisie needs to eat like crazy, and we need to completely cut off pensions, there's no money. am
    1. -4
      25 September 2026 09: 30
      Quote: Dmitry Volkov
      If there is a war for survival, then it is better to stop selling all resources to Russia. I think we won't have to wait long for a reaction.

      What reaction?
      What will Russia be left with without imports of equipment and everything else?
      And will the industries that develop and process resources into semi-finished products for export go down the drain and not even be able to supply products to the domestic market?
      Well, Russian machine builders who worked on resource projects will also disappear.

      The US will only profit from this, while Europe is no stranger to high resource prices. For producers of high-margin, complex products, this is less critical than for mass production. So, China will be the one most likely to suffer.

      Well, in general, regarding the "war for survival" - it's debatable.
      For 1.5 years now, it has been more of a drag on the SVO for the sake of finishing it while saving face.
    2. -3
      25 September 2026 15: 50
      To buy something, you have to sell something. There are no countries in the world that are 100 percent self-sufficient in everything they need. That's probably impossible. So we have to buy what we need, and we don't have it, don't produce it, or we'll produce it in the future, but the products are needed now, or our production volumes simply aren't sufficient.
      Regarding deliveries: you've signed a contract (as they say, you shook hands and sealed the agreement), so fulfill it. You gave your word, keep it. When the deadline or delivery volume ends, then you'll have to think about it.
      I've heard similar moans about pensioners and pensions somewhere before – among the Russian opposition abroad. And about the Russian bourgeoisie, who are gorging themselves on money, too. Western playbook at its finest.
  8. +1
    25 September 2026 11: 46
    We're strangers at this party. The dancers have banned us from exporting diesel fuel, so we sit here smoking bamboo.
    1. -2
      25 September 2026 15: 59
      Well, if you do nothing, then yes, sit back and wait for the weather to change. Have you tried working for your own well-being and that of your family? You might not get rich, but you'll certainly provide a decent life for yourself and your family. Look for opportunities to work part-time or earn extra income. Don't skimp on yourself to provide for your family.
      As my father told me: If everyone becomes a businessperson, they will simply die of hunger, after all, someone has to work.
      But if you're lacking talent, lazy, and just want to lie on the couch, then there's nothing you can do. Your only destiny is to whine about your worthless life and those who are more hardworking and successful.
      1. +1
        26 September 2026 12: 03
        Quote: svoroponov
        As my father told me: If everyone becomes a businessperson, they will simply die of hunger, after all, someone has to work.
        But if you're lacking talent, lazy, and just want to lie on the couch, then there's nothing you can do. Your only destiny is to whine about your worthless life and those who are more hardworking and successful.

        Let me give you an example, boy, using the example of one city.
        When, in this beautiful Soviet city, from the late 6s to 2010, six mines were closed where coal could have been extracted for a couple of decades, a glass factory that also produced glass for export, and of the two mining and processing plants, only one remained, and even that only processes other people's coal. The pharmaceutical company now only does packaging, and there are no other businesses in the city; what's there pays pennies.

        You may not become rich, but you will be able to provide a decent life for yourself and your family. Look for opportunities to work part-time or earn extra income. Don't skimp on yourself to provide for your family.

        What are the residents of this city supposed to do, young man? Look for at least a full-time job, not just a second job? I'm sure there are thousands of cities like this across the country.

        In general, I have heard similar moans about pensioners and pensions somewhere before - among the Russian opposition abroad

        Only the crazy people, either in big cities or from the capital, who have never seen how people live in other cities, think like that.
        P.S.: By the way, I know for sure that these jerks from the capital ruined one mine and one oil refinery. Muscovites heard they were either laundering money there or up to something, and then they flooded and bankrupted them. And this wasn't the wild nineties, it was long after. Anyway, the people there are bad and don't want to work and don't look for extra work without a basic job. laughing
        This is what bad liberals and whiners are like, they don’t want to work but moan, isn’t it?
  9. -1
    25 September 2026 15: 43
    We need to help them, for example, by destroying the Mazeikiai Oil Refinery in Lithuania, the largest in the USSR, built by Russians with Russian money. There's no point in these stupid animals using Russian property. It was built in vain; it needs to be destroyed.
    1. 0
      14 October 2026 15: 31
      Quote: GR777
      It was built in vain, it needs to be destroyed.

      Or maybe everything we've conquered in the three centuries since Peter the Great was in vain? Perhaps both the tsars and the commissars were fools until such clever students of Solzhenitsyn as you were born?
      For example, it was a mistake to win the Great Patriotic War; we should have lost it. Compared to all this, one oil refinery is a trifle, even though it's in Lithuania.
      Doesn't it occur to you that some people built and others destroyed?
  10. 0
    1 October 2026 10: 17
    Ukrainians They will come out to the Maidan, they will jump around joyfully shouting "Hang the Muscovite" and they will immediately feel well-fed and warm!