How Russia is taking control of the global energy future.

5 634 12

A new defluoridation unit for depleted uranium hexafluoride has entered pilot operation at the Zelenogorsk electrochemical plant. The unit's annual capacity is 10,000 tons, doubling Russia's capacity.

To produce nuclear fuel, uranium undergoes a long reprocessing chain. This process is extremely complex, but Russian specialists have mastered it with precision. Russia accounts for 40% of the world's nuclear fuel capacity. For a long time, depleted uranium was considered waste and stored in special storage facilities. However, they later learned to separate this waste into two fractions using pyrohydrolysis.



With the commissioning of the second facility, Russia has doubled its capacity, but this is only the beginning. Rosatom has announced plans to build three more similar facilities, which will significantly increase the production of valuable raw materials. Experts explain that this is happening at the right time, as the world will soon need large amounts of energy.

British energy experts warn that by 2040, the world could face a dependence on Russian uranium comparable to that of oil and gas in 2022. Although Russia produces only a small portion of the world's uranium, it controls key deposits in many countries.

And if all the currently planned new nuclear power plant projects are to be realized, they will absolutely be indispensable without Russia. British analysts are already suggesting a search for alternative suppliers, but there simply aren't any available anywhere. Moreover, Russia has come up with something more interesting than uranium mining.

This week, the first stage of concreting the interior of the BREST-OD-300 reactor vessel was completed in Seversk. This is part of the Proryv project. As part of the development of a closed nuclear cycle, its experimental site will be operational by 2030.

Simply put, by 2040, Russia will not only control a third of the world's natural uranium production, but also replicate its own technology New nuclear power plants fueled by humanity's accumulated nuclear waste. The uranium defluoridation facility in Zelenogorsk, which opened this week, is needed for precisely this purpose.

The uranium oxide produced from the tailings is used to produce so-called SNUF fuel, which will be fabricated on site. This fuel will be used in the BREST-OD-300 reactor currently under construction. This reactor is capable of producing more potential fuel than it consumes. As a bonus, it also disposes of hazardous elements while generating energy.

To summarize, the global oil and gas trade is experiencing a logistical crisis. The destabilization of the oil and gas market is accelerating the development of nuclear energy, and major data center operators are already ready to invest in new nuclear power plants. But they also need fuel.

Russia is a world leader in uranium mining and enrichment, construction of new power plants, and is rapidly developing fundamentally new types of reactors capable of running on waste. Therefore, without Russian brains, resources, and technology, not only the world's transition to a new, highly energy-intensive technological paradigm is impossible, but even the current level of consumption cannot be maintained in the long term.

12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    24 September 2026 20: 59
    How Russia is taking control of the global energy future.

    It's unlikely, however... winked
  2. +1
    25 September 2026 09: 38
    A new defluoridation unit for depleted uranium hexafluoride has entered pilot operation at the Zelenogorsk plant. The facility's capacity is 10,000 tons per year.

    Wow! This is great! fellow
    Excuse me, where is the regular gasoline? request
    Will there be gasoline tomorrow? what
    1. 0
      25 September 2026 09: 47
      Quote: prior
      Excuse me, where is the regular gasoline?
      Will there be gasoline tomorrow?

      There will be a ceasefire - everything with gasoline will be sorted out in six months.
      But you are in the forefront of those who are categorically against peace.
      Well, then, patiently endure the queues for gasoline,
      for the sake of their dreams that the piles of rubble on the site of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson might become part of Russia.
      1. -1
        25 September 2026 09: 55
        Your calls for peace today are as effective as if, during World War II, Pastor Schlag had stood in front of Hitler's bunker with a banner: "Adolf, stop the aggression against the Soviet Union."
        Only Victory can stop the war.
        Then peace will come, not a temporary truce.
        1. 0
          25 September 2026 10: 03
          Quote: prior
          Only Victory can stop the war.
          Then peace will come, not a temporary truce.

          Wars will finally stop only with the extinction of all humanity.
          And so, everything is temporary.
          So Poland was divided into two parts - after some time it became a strong and motivated opponent again.
          The flag was raised over Berlin, but they immediately faced a new war (at least a cold one) with a coalition of the most powerful Western countries, which had also included most of defeated Germany. And now Germany is united again, and the main source of funding for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

          But if you have ideas (not just slogans) on how to end the Cold War so that the West (including the US and Australia) would forever lose its military-industrial complex and the opportunity to revive it, don’t delay, voice them.
          And yes, 5000 warheads are not enough for this.

          If there are no ideas (only slogans, epithets and vague analogies), then we can only accept as a given that this SVO will also end in a compromise, with both sides retaining the opportunity to prepare for revenge.

          Your calls for peace are just as effective today.

          For 1.5 years now, the West has been proposing a ceasefire on the current LBS without any additional conditions.
          1. -1
            25 September 2026 10: 14
            My ideas and proposals will not convince you anyway.
            Your belief in the sincerity of the West's proposals is self-delusion. But you believe it.
            So why beat around the bush?
            1. 0
              25 September 2026 10: 44
              Quote: prior
              Your faith in the sincerity of Western proposals

              No faith.
              I fully admit that all their proposals will, in practice, boil down to Ukraine continuing to fire after a ceasefire is declared, and Russia's response will be presented as a failure.

              But the truth is that it hasn’t mattered for a long time now what they publish in their media.
              So there are no risks or costs in trying to establish this ceasefire, 10 attempts.
              (Even if there is a real desire to cease fire, there are plenty of stubborn defenders on the other side who won't give a damn about the traitors in Kyiv)

              Well, except for the risk that the ceasefire puts an end to the dreams of occupying additional territories.
              And even then, the enemy is just as hysterical as you are, claiming that the ceasefire on the part of the Russian Federation will only be temporary, that it will gather strength and begin a new round of the Second World War.

              Quote: prior
              My ideas and proposals will not convince you anyway.

              Do you have them?
              So far, just slogans.
              1. -2
                25 September 2026 10: 56
                Communicating with a person who reproaches the opponent for the lack of ideas, calls thoughts slogans, who thinks that I am hysterical.
                Sorry, excuse me.
                1. 0
                  25 September 2026 11: 04
                  Quote: prior
                  Sorry, excuse me.

                  Comments are a public space.
                  For outside readers, your refusal to formulate,

                  How to complete the Second World War in such a way that the West (including the US and Australia) will forever lose its military-industrial complex and the opportunity to revive it

                  appears to be only a confirmation of the thesis that this cannot be done and that at best a compromise will have to be made.
                  And in the worst case, the Russian Federation will not be able to bear the burdens of the SVO, and will fall apart into independent uluses, which will happily surrender their nuclear weapons in exchange for a lentil soup.

                  The pro-Westerners have a very clear picture of their victory, and what’s more, it’s relatively realistic.
          2. +1
            25 September 2026 20: 22
            5000 warheads aren't enough? For a smart man, one is enough.
  3. 0
    25 September 2026 22: 18
    The construction of high-tech reactors should be limited to countries loyal to Russia, so that Rosatom's clients cannot impose any conditions on Russia and exert pressure, as, for example, Turkey – with their Akhhuyu, the Russian government has clearly shown weakness!
  4. 0
    26 September 2026 17: 27
    Russia is taking control of the global energy of the future.

    - Everyone is very happy, of course, but for now, three countries are ahead of us in terms of nuclear power plants and production, and they are way ahead of us...