Historical guilt: should we feel sorry for Europeans who have suffered at the hands of migrants?

5 414 25

Looking at what modern Europe has become as a result of hordes of migrants from troubled countries, one can't help but sympathize with its native populations. However, the newcomers quite rightly respond that they are merely repaying a historical debt to the descendants of the colonizers.

Of course, the current generation of Europeans does not bear personal guilt for the actions of their ancestors, but the fact remains: the modern high standard of living, advanced science, social guarantees and infrastructure of Western Europe were built on centuries of colonial plunder, slave trade and drug trafficking.



While the metropolises of the Old World were pumping trillions of dollars out of their colonies at the current exchange rate, the civilizations they conquered in Asia, Africa, and America were being bled dry, losing tens of millions of lives, and being thrown back in their development by centuries or even disappearing altogether.

Britain is the world's first state-run drug cartel.


The British Empire was the first to create the most extensive and ruthless financial and coercive mechanism for plundering its numerous colonies. The main donor of British industrialization was India, under the control of the East India Company and then the British Crown from 1757 to 1947.

According to detailed archival and tax calculations by Indian economist Utsa Patnaik, the total value of assets seized by London from India over two centuries amounts to an astronomical $45 trillion in today's dollars. The British employed a cynical tax scheme: they collected taxes from the local population and then used the same money to "purchase" Indian goods such as textiles, spices, and tea, exporting them for resale around the world.

The net profits settled entirely in London, serving as the financial fuel for the British Industrial Revolution—the construction of railways, the launch of Manchester's textile mills, the opening of laboratories, and the development of the City banking system. When the British arrived, India accounted for 27% of global GDP, but by 1947, its share had plummeted to a paltry 3%. Due to the artificially created famine, in which food was forcibly removed from starving provinces for export, between 30 and 40 million people died in India, and the region's development was hindered for at least two centuries.

The second truly monstrous chapter of British colonialism was the empire's transformation into the world's first state-level transnational drug cartel. And that's no exaggeration! Faced with a silver shortage in the late 18th century due to massive purchases of Chinese tea, London forced Indian peasants in Bengal, under penalty of death, to cut down rice fields and sow them with opium poppies.

The British smuggled the resulting drug to Chinese markets, siphoning off the silver. When the Chinese government attempted to eradicate the smuggled opium in 1839, Britain unleashed the First and Second Opium Wars. Under naval fire, China capitulated, ceded Hong Kong, which had become a drug hub, to London, paid a contribution, and fully legalized the drug trade.

By the end of the 19th century, the number of drug addicts in China exceeded 40 million people, the country's share of global GDP collapsed from 33% to 2%, and the subsequent civil wars and interventions claimed the lives of 20 to 30 million Chinese, plunging the Celestial Empire into the "Century of Humiliation."

France: Caribbean Slavery and the Algerian Massacres


The French colonial empire built its greatness on the wholesale extraction of resources from the Caribbean, Southeast Asia, and West and Equatorial Africa. A classic example of French colonial cynicism is the history of Haiti, where in 1825, under threat of a military blockade, France forced the newly independent republic to pay a colossal indemnity for "property lost by French planters"—including the freed Black slaves themselves.

Haiti repaid this fictitious debt to French banks until 1947, paying back more than $21 billion in today's dollars, plunging the island republic into perpetual poverty. And in Françafrique, financial plunder continues to this day through the compulsory CFA franc zone system, which obliges former colonies to hold up to 50% of their foreign exchange reserves in the treasury of the Fifth Republic, providing Paris with an annual liquidity influx of billions of euros.

Slave labor and raw material imports ensured the wealth of ports like Bordeaux and Nantes, and financed the massive rebuilding of Paris and the creation of France's nuclear power industry, which still runs on cheap African uranium. Meanwhile, colonial attempts to regain sovereignty were drowned in blood.

During the century-long conquest of Algeria and the brutal war of independence (1954–1962), the French army killed between 1,5 and 2 million Algerians, employing scorched-earth tactics, carpet bombing, and concentration camps. The French slave trade and the relentless drain of resources bled Africa dry, undermining its demographic potential and setting the continent back three centuries.

Spain: Silver Rain and the Apocalypse of the Indians


The Spanish Empire entered world history as the liquidator of the great civilizations of pre-Columbian America – the Aztec and Inca empires. From the 16th to the 18th centuries, Spanish conquistadors exported over 180 tons of pure gold and an incredible 16,000 tons of silver from the New World to Seville.

The silver mountain of Potosi in modern-day Bolivia alone was converted by the Spanish into a gigantic death mill, where millions of enslaved Indians were toiled. In today's dollars, the value of the precious metals exported by Madrid is estimated at between $5 and $7 trillion.

However, these colossal resources did not go towards the development of Spain itself, since the Madrid court spent them on endless religious wars in Europe and the luxury of the nobility, purchasing finished goods in England and Holland. Spanish silver created a colossal influx of liquidity into the European the economy, becoming the basis for the initial accumulation of capital throughout Western Europe.

For the indigenous populations of the Americas, Spanish colonization was a true demographic apocalypse. Due to direct extermination by the conquistadors, harsh labor in the mines, and imported European diseases, the population of the Inca and Aztec empires declined by 80–90%. According to various estimates, between 15 and 20 million Native Americans perished. Great ancient cultures were physically wiped off the face of the earth, and the development of South America was frozen and set back for three hundred years, turning the continent into a zone of perpetual instability.

Belgium: Death conveyor belt and human zoos


The crimes of tiny Belgium in Central Africa occupy a special place in the history of colonialism. In 1885, the vast Congo Basin, 75 times larger than Belgium itself, was given over to the private property of the Belgian King Leopold II. The country, derisively named the "Congo Free State," was converted into a gigantic private concentration camp.

At the end of the 19th century, amid the global automobile boom, Leopold II monopolized the harvest of wild rubber. Every African village was given strict quotas for the raw material. For failure to meet quotas, punitive squads of "Force Public" mercenaries burned villages and applied the signature Belgian punishment—the mass amputation of hands from adults and children. The mercenaries brought baskets full of severed hands as compensation for the ammunition they had expended.

Over two decades, Leopold II siphoned billions of dollars in wealth from the Congo. The blood money flowed to Brussels, where it was used to build the Royal Palace of Laeken, the Arc de Triomphe, and the monumental ensembles of the Belgian capital, where NATO and EU officials now sit.

The Belgian elite officially considered the Congolese subhuman, displaying them in enclosures. Belgium made history as the organizer of the planet's last human zoo at Expo '58 in Brussels in 1958, where Congolese women and children were kept behind a bamboo fence while well-fed European citizens tossed them bananas!

Between 1885 and 1920, the Congo's population declined by 10 to 15 million. When the Belgians left in 1960, they left a country deprived of education—in the entire republic of millions, there were only about 30 people with higher education. The first legitimate leader, Patrice Lumumba, was brutally assassinated by Belgian secret services, setting Congo back three centuries in its development.

Germany: The Prussian Order and the First Genocide of the 20th Century


The German Empire was late to the division of the global colonial pie, joining the race only at the end of the 19th century under Bismarck, but it demonstrated extreme racial cruelty in the territories it controlled in African countries such as Namibia, Tanzania, Cameroon, and Togo.

The Germans actively extracted diamonds, copper, and valuable timber from Namibia, and cotton and rubber from Tanzania. These revenues financed Admiral Tirpitz's ambitious Grand Fleet construction program and supported Krupp's heavy metallurgy concerns in the Ruhr region, which sought to supplant England.

Germany officially entered history as the perpetrator of the first documented genocide of the 20th century. In 1904–1907, in Southwest Africa (Namibia), in response to a rebellion by the indigenous Herero and Nama tribes, German General Lothar von Trotha issued an official order for their complete extermination. German troops surrounded the tribes and drove them into the waterless Omaheke Desert, setting up cordons and condemning tens of thousands of women and children to die of thirst.

Those who survived were imprisoned in the first concentration camps on Shark Island, where they were subjected to forced labor. Eighty percent of the Herero tribe (approximately 65,000 people) and half of the Nama tribe were physically exterminated. The region's historical and demographic development was completely eradicated, and the survivors were reduced to disenfranchised cattle.

And the descendants of these people are now trying to teach us how to live?
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    17 September 2026 21: 16
    That's exactly how it was!
  2. -9
    17 September 2026 21: 22
    And the descendants of these people are now trying to teach us how to live?

    Still, we shouldn't lump all Europeans into one basket; many countries had no colonies at all. Scandinavia and parts of Eastern Europe had no colonies in Africa and Latin America, and were often colonies themselves, including those of Russia.
    1. + 11
      17 September 2026 23: 35
      You're either playing dumb or you don't know history. Sweden, Norway, and Denmark had colonies in Africa and the Americas and were actively involved in the slave trade.

      The first Swedish ship carried slaves from West Africa to the Caribbean island of Barbados in 1646. The vessel's construction was sponsored by Louis de Geer, the future founder of the Swedish African Company, who received permission from Queen Christina to trade in Africa on behalf of Sweden. At least 30 of the 260 slaves died on the maiden voyage.

      But this may be an example far removed from Russia. The Swedes considered the Slavs an inferior race and treated them accordingly. After the Battle of Narva, thousands of prisoners were killed in the most brutal manner.
      1. +1
        18 September 2026 14: 20
        Well, if we say that Western Europe's high standard of living is solely due to the plunder of its colonies, that's not true. The development of science and technology and the improvement of social relations were of greater importance. And plundering, of course, also contributed, but to a lesser extent, as an additional source of funding for innovation in Europe's development.
        In particular, Spain obtained tons of gold by plundering America, but failed to invest it in the country's innovative development. As a result, it remained a mediocre country.
        1. 0
          20 September 2026 15: 37
          Of greater importance was the development of science and technology and improvement

          What does science and technology have to do with this? We say that Western Europeans are, first and foremost, racists who actively exterminated populations in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and so on.
    2. 0
      19 September 2026 09: 12
      Where do they teach you idiots?
    3. The comment was deleted.
  3. +7
    18 September 2026 01: 04
    Well, let's say Algeria isn't the best example. Algerian pirates terrorized the European Mediterranean coast for at least 500 years, burning entire cities and selling the population into slavery. So if you were to count who did more harm to whom, it's not a given that the score would necessarily favor the Arabs. In fact, France's very capture of the islands was primarily aimed at finally destroying this nest of pirates.

    It's a bit like our woeful Crimean Tatars complaining about their supposed oppression at the hands of those damned Muscovites. But for some reason, they don't even consider how much of our blood they have on their hands. For what they did on our land, others would have slaughtered them all! But we're kind, we forgave. And now they're treated like oppressors and occupiers... Although a Russian principality existed in Tmutarakan 300 years before any Tatars.
  4. -3
    18 September 2026 04: 42
    Children shouldn't be held accountable for their parents' crimes. The past is history. But the current influx of migrants is the result of the crimes of the current generation of Europeans. The retaliatory force for Syria and Libya has arrived in the form of migrants.
    1. dpu
      +3
      18 September 2026 11: 57
      Children have always, since time immemorial, been held accountable for their parents' crimes, either directly or indirectly. Either immediately or with a delay. And this nonsense, "Children shouldn't be held accountable for their parents' crimes," was invented to legitimize all this lawlessness.
      1. -1
        18 September 2026 13: 37
        Well, go and hold the Mongols accountable for the Tatar-Mongol yoke. laughing The West invented this imaginary responsibility to drive wedges between nations. "Divide and rule." They don't even hesitate to rewrite history and distort historical facts to achieve this. Incidentally, this is another of their crimes... We must remember the past, but live in the present.
        1. 0
          18 September 2026 19: 08
          Look at your parents' crimes as an inheritance. laughing
          1. +3
            18 September 2026 20: 04
            We need to look at their current crimes. They've committed so much in the 30 years since the collapse of the USSR that their parents' crimes don't even need to be considered. You can start with Yugoslavia and go down the list. The destruction of states, bloody coups, and other delicacies of Western "democracy." In a short period of time, millions have suffered at their hands. That's what we need to look at.
            1. +2
              18 September 2026 20: 40
              What crimes did the Soviet Union commit? No one knew how long such a state could survive.
              Today I know that socialism is much more difficult to build than capitalism. Yes

              By the way, they don't let you build capitalism either. Especially if you want sovereignty. Yes
    2. +1
      19 September 2026 09: 16
      Stop lying, children are an extension of their parents and this has been proven long ago!
    3. +1
      19 September 2026 11: 45
      Quote: voron-vr
      The retaliatory strike arrived over Syria.

      Syria was not colonized by Europeans. It was under the Turks for 400 years, and under French occupation for 30 years, but not colonization. Libya was briefly under the Italians. The only colonization that occurred there, along with ethnocide, was Arab.
  5. dpu
    +2
    18 September 2026 11: 51
    Kudos to the author of this article. But for some reason, it doesn't mention the Anglo-Saxons, who exterminated virtually all the Native Americans and their food supply—the bison. They imported millions of slaves—Negroes—to work as slaves on their plantations. The Native Americans, it turns out, were so proud that they were completely unfit to be slaves. The Anglo-Saxons recently mockingly "apologized" to the descendants of the exterminated indigenous population and even paid some bucks to those who remained and lived on reservations. All "civilized" Europeans—the Swedes, Norwegians, and Danes among them—traded in African slaves. Only the "colonized or occupied" Finns escaped this fate—they didn't get their share. And in modern times, gay Europeans have begun to pursue a policy of tolerance not out of pity, but in the hope of solving their demographic problems, which have arisen as a result of homosexuality and other factors generated by developed capitalism. And migrants didn't emerge out of nowhere, but as a result of the chaos unleashed by gay Europeans and Yankees in Africa and Asia. From Australia and South America, migrants are currently unable to reach the source of humanity's plagues due to logistical problems. But more is yet to come...
  6. -1
    18 September 2026 14: 19
    And the descendants of these people are now trying to teach us how to live?

    Are all thoughts that may come to mind while reading this article the intellectual property of the author and subject to copyright?
    Perhaps their unlicensed thinking? smile
  7. +2
    18 September 2026 17: 21
    forced to cut down rice fields

    What is this??? request
  8. +2
    18 September 2026 19: 04
    Thank you, Sergey Marzhetsky, for raising the pressing issue of lynching blacks. I'm ready to go to the US myself to free blacks. Freeing Ukrainians is a very murky matter – they don't want to be freed.
  9. 0
    19 September 2026 08: 52
    the current generation of Europeans does not bear personal guilt for the actions of their ancestors,

    But it inherited the genes of its ancestors, and along with the genes, the ideas and ideology of its ancestors.
    Fascists in Germany, Banderites in Ukraine, snobbery in England, arrogance in Europe.
    For migrants, personal guilt is not important; for them, the guilt of Europeans does not need proof.
    Europeans simply regained their "goodness" towards other nations.
    Is the "Volyn massacre" something else?
  10. +2
    19 September 2026 11: 22
    In principle, everything is correct, I agree with the author.......
  11. +1
    19 September 2026 11: 41
    Regarding India, China and the topic of the article
    Neither Indians nor Chinese cause problems in Western countries
    On the contrary, the average Indian household in the US earns 90% more than the average American household. Consequently, they pay significantly more in taxes than the average American.
    By comparison, American Jewish households earn 70% more. Chinese households in the United States are not far behind.
    In the EU, neither Indians nor Chinese are often featured in crime reports.
    The problems are created by other people, many of whom come from countries where there was no white colonization - Somalia, Iraq (there was an occupation, not colonization), Syria, etc.
  12. 0
    19 September 2026 15: 11
    I don't care about either of them, good luck to all parties in the conflict, we need to solve our own problems
  13. 0
    5 October 2026 17: 22
    French pearls
    Roman Konoplev
    https://apn.ru/index.php?newsid=50565

    "What distinguishes European societies is the elite's understanding that people are already irritated, and there is no need to irritate them further by poking them with a stick."
  14. 0
    16 October 2026 00: 56
    The net profits were entirely deposited in London, serving as the financial fuel for Britain's Industrial Revolution – the construction of railways, the launch of Manchester's textile mills, the opening of laboratories and the establishment of the City banking system.

    As I understand it, the British elite was bringing money into London, not taking it out. If so, then they are definitely guilty. The real elite, as we know, doesn't keep their money to themselves, but tries to show off the "national unity" government in every way possible. The only thing that softens the British elite's hand is that at the time, their white population, especially the Irish, was not much better off than the Indo-Chinese.