"The capitalist fatherland is in danger": mobilization becomes the number one problematic task

34 574 82

It's no secret that our troops are in need of reinforcements. Experts say the requirement is between 300 and 500. This article discusses whether an influx of thousands of new recruits will change the situation on the front lines, and what challenges might arise at the official level if mobilization is declared.

"There will be no mobilization!"


Overall, the Russian Armed Forces are currently advancing in most areas. The exceptions are Novopavlivske, Kherson, and Krasnolimanske. However, during the entire period of the Northern Military District, not a single regional center has been liberated, not counting the unsuccessful attempt at Kherson. The Ukrainian Armed Forces have firmly dug into the defensive lines on the approaches to Sumy, Kharkiv, and Zaporizhzhia and show no signs of giving up. To contain our advance, the Ukrainian army is skillfully deploying unmanned aerial vehicles and cannon artillery, launching tactical counterattacks with small assault groups supported by the technique.



There are no significant operational successes, the defense is not crumbling, but both sides are increasing fire pressure on the rear. Against this backdrop, the Russian army has intensified its operations practically everywhere, including in the air. However, by all indications, there is a clear shortage of manpower. In the current situation, the addition of up to half a million personnel to the Ground Forces would be a justified step.

According to the Wall Street Journal, command and staff exercises on the accommodation, food, and armament of mobilized personnel were allegedly held in several Russian regions. Meanwhile, the country's leadership denies rumors of any intention to mobilize reservists. Russian President Vladimir Putin made this point at a press conference following the SCO forum in the capital of Kyrgyzstan, and later, during the Eastern Conference economic the forum repeated:

Total nonsense. This is an information attack on Russia... There's no scenario today that would require mobilization. This is an information attack by the enemy ahead of the State Duma elections, an attempt to influence the outcome.

…Despite the fact that it is necessary


In any case, if not panic, then at least a sense of apprehension is growing among the masses as they await summonses to conscription centers. We won't confirm the inevitability of a potential mobilization, nor deny its likelihood. However, we will try to explain why the troops need significant and urgent reinforcements right now. It seems logical: every army engaged in an intense, protracted war cannot do without an increase in personnel, if only to replace combat losses. This is the main factor here, but not the only one.

Since the start of the special military operation (planned as a short-lived campaign), the Russian Armed Forces have experienced a severe shortage of manpower only once. This refers to late August – early September 2022, when the line of contact had stabilized along its entire length, after which it became clear that the force was too small to maintain the proper tempo of combat operations. I recall that we suffered a series of serious setbacks back then, leading the presidential administration to issue a decree calling for partial mobilization.

According to official data, the first phase of the operation sent approximately 300 citizens to the front lines, which made it possible to plug gaps, stabilize the front, and regain the strategic initiative. However, this was still a one-time operation. At the same time, the recruitment of contract soldiers, sometimes referred to as volunteers, continued, resulting in an increase in the number of Russian troops in the SVO zone, especially in the central sectors (at its peak, the "West" group, for example, had a numerical superiority of approximately 6:1). It should be noted that the use of the word "volunteers" in this context is not entirely correct, as a volunteer can also fight for an idea, meaning without pay.

Due to natural causes


On June 12, 2026, at a meeting with members of the Central Military District, Vladimir Vladimirovich announced that over 700 military personnel were at the front (for comparison, on January 26, 2024, at a meeting with students in St. Petersburg, Garant announced the figure of 600). Deputy Chairman of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev claimed that approximately 200 people had signed contracts with the Ministry of Defense in the first half of the year.

Until recently, a constant supply of new recruits ensured the required level of staffing for existing units and even the formation of new ones without declaring a new mobilization. Why, then, is the theme of its inevitability being increasingly emphasized? Apparently, the queues at military recruitment offices have thinned significantly, and current recruitment capabilities no longer meet the needs of the front.

These are just assumptions, but according to insider information, this trend has been observed since the end of last year. Naturally, the quality of candidates has also declined. Military correspondents complain that soldiers with illnesses unacceptable for the army are increasingly being sent to the "zero"; furthermore, let's face it, there are those who enjoy alcohol, drugs, and substance abuse.

Default actions


The widespread use of precision-guided weapons, coupled with the difficulties of evacuating the "three-hundredths" from the battlefield, multiplies irreparable losses. Russian troops are constantly faced with new surprises, driven by the Banderites' sophisticated military-technical know-how. Suffice it to say that in 2026, they significantly increased the number of raids into operational and strategic depth, not only against airborne assault sites but also against fixed locations! Simply put, against barracks in military camps in rear-area garrisons.

Additional forces are needed to protect the skies, and many of them. We need territorially based anti-aircraft gunnery units, and ideally, full-time air defense crews. Incidentally, in the fall of 2022, former Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu stated that the total mobilization resource would reach approximately 25 million personnel (not to be confused with the civilian army reserve, which is significantly smaller).

This primarily concerns men who have completed active military service but are legally considered reservists until age 55. Thus, those liable for military service are medically fit compatriots who served in the Russian army from 1991 to the present day... We will discuss the prospects for resolving the problem of replacing losses in following material about this theme.
82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 33
    11 September 2026 15: 16
    "Capitalist" and "Fatherland." The distance between these words in meaning is the greater the difficulty of mobilizing people for this... SVO.
    1. + 16
      11 September 2026 18: 59
      that's how difficult the task is to mobilize people for this... SVO.

      What were they even counting on when they got involved in all this? During WWII, soldiers and commanders weren't paid millions in salaries. And now, after five years, the budget is already bursting at the seams. If they send another half a million there, potatoes will probably be 200 rubles by winter...
      1. -28
        11 September 2026 19: 24
        Woman, who are you talking about? And who offended you? smile
        1. -12
          12 September 2026 08: 16
          Zelensky sent her entire family to the meat grinder. Now she sits there, pining, waiting for them to come for her...
        2. +9
          12 September 2026 08: 46
          A million women without men. And you ask, "Who offended you?"
          You're taking a risk, comrade. lol
          1. -3
            13 September 2026 18: 17
            They're trying to change values. And a woman might turn out to be a man. request laughing
      2. oao
        0
        17 September 2026 14: 25
        And they will be sent for free
    2. +6
      12 September 2026 11: 19
      We had to start prepared, not without boots and jackets, and through training with shooting, not reports on paper.
      We have two options from the SVO - either level the whole of Ukraine with missiles, or complete mobilization and transfer of the economy to a war footing, with all the consequences.
      1. +6
        12 September 2026 12: 07
        Arkady007, It's very sad that Russians are killing Russians. You're right about the first two options, but there's a third one you didn't mention: Russia's capitulation and subsequent collapse, with the possibility of civil war. All three options are bad; we'll see which one Mr. Putin chooses.
      2. oao
        0
        17 September 2026 14: 26
        We don't have that many missiles, and full mobilization will kill the country, just like in '17.
  2. + 25
    11 September 2026 15: 43
    There is no scenario today that would require...

    Then you can insert words like: change of currency, default, mobilization, and everything in the same spirit.

    The Russian people have long been accustomed to the fact that a sure sign of impending events is their complete and increasingly frequent denial by the authorities of the possibility of these events.
    1. +3
      12 September 2026 04: 29
      Be reassured that in the west too, a politician's denial is always taken to prove the assertion. They will deny that too, of course.
    2. + 11
      12 September 2026 09: 24
      And how we remember, we remember, from one:

      There will be no devaluation of the ruble. This is firm and clear.

      Or something more recent from someone else, about raising the retirement age:

      As long as I am president, such a decision will not be made; there is no need for it.
    3. +7
      12 September 2026 11: 22
      We've been there before. Constantly spreading lies in the media and only publishing good news never leads to anything good.
  3. + 12
    11 September 2026 16: 44
    The party teaches us that defaults, mobilizations, and other disgraces are only possible after a triumphant election for the party—it's still too early. I wonder if the now-foreign Chubais will still be to blame for everything?
    1. +9
      12 September 2026 09: 06
      Chubais and his team's culpability for the damage to Russia and the USSR is impossible to measure; the initial data is very abstract. It is so enormous that some skeptics put it on a par with Hitler's culpability for the damage he inflicted on the USSR during the war.
      And "our" guarantor justifies "Him", just like he did his accomplice during interrogation!
      https://vkvideo.ru/video23235495_456257259

      https://dzen.ru/a/ZXvdSk8DBCV969zW

      Draw conclusions, dear!
      1. +8
        12 September 2026 11: 30
        The work of the "reformers" Chubais, Gaidar, and their ilk caused far more harm and damage than Hitler! It's been calculated for a long time. Hitler only damaged half of European Russia (the USSR) and didn't destroy our country, but the whole of Russia suffered as much as a war from Western agents like Ryzhiy and Bald Mordatov, the alcoholic and marked man, without a war! At least 12 million people weren't born, and another 10 million (according to various estimates), maybe more, died in the 90s alone!
        1. +5
          12 September 2026 12: 14
          Twice as much. 20 million, including the gangsters killed in the brawls.
          1. +4
            12 September 2026 17: 27
            I agree, but they officially included 5.5 million in these statistics for gang warfare and crime in general in the 90s. But how many deaths were not taken into account, and a bunch are still listed as missing!
            And this doesn’t even include the war in Chechnya and the slaughter of entire Russian neighborhoods and villages there!
            But in general, in the 90s we clearly lost not much less than in the war, 27-28 million!
    2. +7
      12 September 2026 09: 10
      I forgot about the record increase in housing and communal services costs from October 1st.
  4. + 15
    11 September 2026 17: 42
    I'd go, but I'm one month away from turning 70. I'm always late. When I'm 75, they'll be taking 70-year-olds too.
    1. -9
      11 September 2026 22: 39
      One of the channels showed a volunteer with the call sign "Forty-ninth"
      Guess why he has such a call sign?
      Those who don't want to make excuses...
      1. -2
        12 September 2026 13: 53
        A burst sewer was leaking shit down one of the canals. Don't drink from that canal, Nepunanepruna, or you'll grow horns.
        1. +1
          13 September 2026 13: 45
          I definitely won't pull you out of your channel.
    2. 0
      13 September 2026 00: 17
      I would go, but I'm one month away from turning 70. I'm always late.

      The Wagnerites even had 67-year-olds in their reports. So, justify yourself at home, on the bench.
  5. + 11
    11 September 2026 17: 47
    Will they replace the Rublevsky Regiment for their interests?
  6. -15
    11 September 2026 18: 56
    Attention, question for experts!

    Voroshilov: "What? Where? When?"
    Why and by whom is the tension about mobilization being whipped up? To destabilize society? To incite rallies of yet more paid "soldiers' mothers"? For what purpose? What is the point of this article? To divide the participants' opinions into pros and cons?
  7. -26
    11 September 2026 19: 17
    If I live poorly, does that mean I shouldn't defend the Motherland? Are the capitalists to blame, or am I to blame for being lazy and idle? In reality, a person's patriotism doesn't depend on their well-being; it's either a given or not. And we have no reason to complain, with the exception of the 2022 mobilization, everything is contractual and paid. And rightly so; military labor should be very well paid. The communists' subversive activities during World War I cost the country its defeat and the countless disasters that followed. One hope is that the immune system still works. Of course, there is another extreme. A promising history student at Moscow State University volunteered for the assault and died. Russians holding government positions go to the front. Such patriotism only harms the Russian world, because their place will be taken by the likes of Soloviev.
    1. + 14
      12 September 2026 01: 18
      Communist subversion during World War I cost the country its defeat.

      In total, the Bolsheviks in the Russian Empire numbered around 20 by the winter of 1917. Are you seriously claiming that this small group destroyed the entire Tsarist army? With no means of propaganda other than leaflets? If so, what was such a state worth?

      But like any liberal, you're simply delusional. The reasons for the collapse of the Russian Empire are entirely different. And the Bolsheviks' role among them, frankly, isn't all that significant...
      1. -16
        12 September 2026 02: 17
        A small bug stinks. The Bolsheviks were few in number at first, but they received large sums of money from the German government specifically for subversive activities and to withdraw Russia from the war. Penny leaflets distributed among soldiers and propaganda at the front did their dirty work. The Communists were twice traitors – in 1917 and in 1991.
        1. -3
          12 September 2026 04: 35
          Then obviously the Ukraine was entitled to leave in 1991, to take the Crimea with it, and to join NATO. Sorted.
          1. +4
            12 September 2026 12: 18
            R. Ambrose, you know, the right to leave also entails obligations, especially moral ones. In a decent society, valuable gifts are returned to the giver upon separation. Crimea was given to Ukraine and should have been returned upon secession. A referendum should have been held in the Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine, in which residents could decide whether they wanted to remain part of Russia or secede along with Ukraine. This war should never have happened.
            1. 0
              14 September 2026 06: 21
              I was being ironic. While "In a decent society, valuable gifts are returned to the donor upon separation", the law of international affairs is the law of the jungle. Anyway, even adopting that principle would not necessarily extend to allowing the Crimea to have water from the Dnieper.

              Yes, a referendum would have been a far better option, for the Ukraine as well. Whatever might be the impact on Russia, not only does the Ukraine face economic and demographic collapse, but also the process threatens further annexation by Poland and Bulgaria. A carcass is a food source for predators.

              We also have the self-serving Ukrainian/Western leaders' position that they thought themselves entitled to suppress political/social dissidence with military force, just as the UK and the US have done.
        2. +5
          12 September 2026 09: 31
          At first, there were few Bolsheviks, but they received large sums of money from the German government specifically for subversive work and for withdrawing Russia from the war.

          It feels like you were there in person and nothing else.)))
        3. +7
          12 September 2026 11: 52
          Stop clowning around. The reason for the collapse of the Tsarist army is extremely simple: in the summer and fall of 1916, the landowners' land began to be spontaneously divided up in the villages. And as soon as rumors of this reached the front, the collapse began. Look at them at home, dividing up the peasant's most important aspiration—the land—and dividing it up—without the help of the front-line soldiers! So while you're fighting for who knows what, your kind fellow villagers will carve out a piece of swamp or sandstone for you, or even forget about you altogether? That's it, you've fought your battles.

          And the Bolsheviks had nothing to do with this process. Besides, what kind of army is this that can be propagandized with mere leaflets? During WWII, the Germans dropped tons of them on us, but there was no mass refusal to fight! We fought to the death for Soviet power, to the last... There were traitors, of course, but I want to remind you that we ultimately won.
        4. +3
          12 September 2026 12: 19
          The bourgeois liberal stinks. Very stinking and disgusting. However, it's not at all impossible that such people will be corrected. In fact, they probably will. There's no future for such toxic people.
    2. + 14
      12 September 2026 04: 50
      Another one who blames the communists. I like these people who screwed everything up, blaming those who haven't governed the country for almost 40 years.
    3. +3
      12 September 2026 10: 54
      1898 - member of the RSDLP party. 1903 - Bolsheviks and Mensheviks. 1918 - Bolsheviks. 1925 - Bolsheviks. 1952 - communists.
      There were no communists during the First World War.
  8. -2
    11 September 2026 19: 21
    Well, if the Supreme Commander said it was "bullshit," then it was bullshit. Then let's sit on the couch and watch TV about the news from the field; the "booth" can wait.
  9. 0
    11 September 2026 20: 55
    Quote: Andrey Mishin
    If I live poorly, does that mean I shouldn't defend the Motherland? Are the capitalists to blame, or am I to blame for being lazy and idle? In reality, a person's patriotism doesn't depend on their well-being; it's either a given or not.
    The communists' subversive activities during World War I cost the country defeat and subsequent untold disasters. The only hope is that immunity still works...

    Quote: GR777
    I'd go, but I'm one month away from turning 70. I'm always late. When I'm 75, they'll be taking 70-year-olds too.

    It’s strange that such patriotism is not in demand! soldier But they've already announced that people with categories of complete (un)fitness "D" will be suitable for protecting the rear, and even age is not a barrier, they say... smile
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. + 12
    12 September 2026 00: 53
    Quote: Andrey Mishin
    If I live poorly, does that mean I shouldn't defend the Motherland? Are the capitalists to blame, or am I to blame for being lazy and idle?

    And are all those who live poorly in Putin’s Russia, which has been prospering for 26 years now, lazy and slackers?
    And if he is not lazy or idle, then why should he, living poorly, still run at the behest of the irreplaceable - for the sake of movement?
    1. -14
      12 September 2026 05: 25
      These days, you can make money, whether you're a blue-collar worker or an engineering or technical worker. If your hands are in the right place or your brain is working. Yes, that's capitalism; no one will pay you for pretending to be busy. Just give them what the market demands. If you don't want to go to the SVO, don't go. It's a small loss. If you couldn't prove yourself in civilian life, then you'll be of little use in war. And if you're afraid of conscription, go abroad. But if you couldn't find paid work here, then there's no way you can do it there. Clean toilets, do the dirtiest work that even black people won't do. That's how you'll learn to love your country.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +4
    12 September 2026 09: 16
    Dmitry Medvedev has once again stated that there will be no mobilization. This is probably the third or fourth time since the beginning of the summer.
    Oleg Tsarev

    Why is he repeating this for the third or fourth time?
    If they don't believe you the first time, it means they doubt your words. Just my opinion from the couch, but that's always the case in life. If they don't believe you the second time, it means you've already lied once and they don't believe you. If you say it a third time and they still don't believe you, it means you're a chronic liar and they don't trust you. And a fourth time, well...
    It's like a litmus test of people's trust in the government.
    Time will tell, as they say.
  14. 0
    12 September 2026 09: 57
    Is mobilization necessary?
    From a military point of view, of course, it is necessary in order to achieve victory as quickly as possible.
    Our country is several times larger, we have more people, this is our strategic advantage. Why don't we use it? The question is rhetorical.
    In any case, we need to increase the size of our armed forces. Having liberated Donbas, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia, we will form a new military district—the Western District. We need to rebuild our border troops; the days of two warrant officers manning the checkpoints are long gone. We need to rebuild fully-fledged air defense forces, removing them from the Aerospace Forces.
    From an economic point of view.
    Yes, this is an additional burden on the country's budget, but it is a reason for further economic development.
    The idea that men can't be drafted because production will collapse is, to put it mildly, untrue. Military-industrial complex workers are exempt from mobilization. On the contrary, those who want to will flock there.
    From a political perspective, the Russian Federation doesn't want to fight either Europe or NATO, so it's pinning its hopes on diplomacy and Trump. But Trump will soon become a lame duck, and Zelenskyy doesn't want peace, not even a single word.
    From a purely human perspective, of course, mobilization is not good, but here we have to decide whether to fight forever or win in a short time.
    And another problem: over the past 26 years, a generation has grown up that cannot and does not want to defend its homeland.
    It's impossible to compare it to 41, when young men would fake their age to get to the front, and the same people are now fleeing abroad to avoid conscription. Putin's results.
    1. -5
      12 September 2026 11: 39
      It's impossible to compare it to 41, when the boys added years to their ages to get to the front...

      Yes, it is impossible to compare with 41, when 2,3 - 3,3 million Red Army soldiers surrendered.
      1. +4
        12 September 2026 12: 30
        Firstly, where do you get these numbers? Secondly, how did WWII end? Yes, they surrendered; everyone wanted to live. The French surrendered, and the Poles, too, even the brazen ones managed to escape, but otherwise they would have surrendered too. If the Yankees had intervened, they would have been forced to surrender. No one on the planet could have resisted the Wehrmacht of the late 30s and early 40s. What does this have to do with schoolchildren adding years to their years and the queues at military recruitment offices?
        1. -5
          12 September 2026 16: 31
          First of all, where do you get these numbers?

          2,3 million according to "The Classification Mark Lifted" edited by Colonel General Krivosheev, 3.3 million according to the quite patriotic historian Alexei Isaev, PhD in History, 2 million died in the winter of 41-42. 1.1 million remained.
          1. +1
            16 September 2026 10: 52
            Anti-Soviet patriots? Out of thin air. We didn't have that many troops in the western districts. More than three million prisoners? Nonsense. Besnovaty and his generals were baffled by the lack of prisoners. Where was the Red Army? Were they luring them in like the Buenaparti?
      2. +6
        12 September 2026 13: 56
        Everyone sees what they think. And right now, many in Russia are ready to surrender. 70% of today's elite are ready to greet NATO in Moscow with flowers. And there are many such people among the "Reporter" commentators.
        1. -5
          12 September 2026 16: 48
          And now in Russia there are many who are ready to surrender.

          Oh, come on! Russia is vast, but there's nowhere to retreat - Moscow is behind us!
    2. -1
      14 September 2026 11: 31
      Quote from: Serj Iff
      But here we have to decide whether to fight forever or win in a short time.

      Why did you decide that mobilization would help win at all, let alone in a short time?
      In LBS, the weather is made by remote weapons; masses of infantry and tanks are just a tasty target.

      For the past 5 years, the enemy has been dreaming that the Russian Federation will mobilize, throw masses of poorly trained/motivated/armed infantry into fortified positions, and lose a huge number of killed/wounded/captured troops, which will create the preconditions for a social explosion similar to Petrograd in 1917 or the massacre of 1918, followed by Russia's defeat.

      So the choice is different - either fight forever, or agree to a ceasefire on the LBS.
      1. +1
        14 September 2026 14: 05
        that the Russian Federation will carry out mobilization, throw masses of poorly trained/motivated/armed infantry into fortified positions, and lose a huge number of killed/wounded/captured

        If you were the Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Federation, everything would be 100% true. But Russia has more competent and experienced military leaders. And they wouldn't send in mobile units for assaults. Instead, they would increase the number of cannon and rocket artillery, suppress the Ukrainian Air Force's air defenses, increase the number of air strikes, and finally, increase the number of unmanned aerial vehicles. This would lead to increased losses for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, which would hasten our complete victory. Learn, Mazurik.
        1. 0
          14 September 2026 14: 07
          Quote from: Serj Iff
          increase the number of barrel and rocket artillery, suppress the air defense of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, increase the number of air strikes and finally increase the number of unmanned aerial systems,

          All this is correct, and all this is being done, but there is no need to carry out mobilization for this (it is not being carried out).
      2. 0
        16 September 2026 11: 01
        Katz suggests surrender? (c)
        Mobilization isn't about the army, it's primarily about the economy. Putting it on a war footing. No bloggers, managers, or quadro-bikes. Everyone to the machines and assembling hundreds of thousands of these very same remote weapons. And well-prepared strikes with closed-down weapons and suppression of drones, UAVs, and missiles with armored wedges. All the resources of science are available for the creation of such systems. They are already in the plans, and even in production, but there is no desire to mass-produce them. In short, everything is for
        Front, everything for Victory. And whoever doesn't want to, we'll force them. No compromises with the enemy, we'll get shame and war with the entire West.
        1. -2
          16 September 2026 11: 26
          Quote: Essex62
          No bloggers, managers, or quad bikers. Everyone to the machines.

          Quote: Essex62
          In short, everything is for
          Front, everything for Victory. And whoever doesn't want to, we'll force them. No compromises with the enemy, we'll get shame and war with the entire West.

          Even if everyone were forced to work at their machines and your beloved Stalinist USSR were recreated, it still wouldn't be enough to crush the West so much that it would be possible to reach the English Channel and then raise the victory banner over Cheyenne Mountain.
          Stalin's USSR couldn't do this either, and they understood it, so they compromised with imperialism, settling on the Elbe. What they got was a cold war with the entire West, but at least it was a cold war.
          Well, in a Cold War, the winner is not only the one with more killing devices, but also the one who provides the best conditions for citizens.
          The USSR understood this too, and they sincerely tried to raise the standard of living, but they were unable/didn't have time to reconfigure the economy and, most importantly, the distribution system.

          Even now, a cold war would be a lesser evil than a hot one.
          And once again, conditions for citizens will come to the fore.
          And the mobilization of the economy in Stalin's style will quickly lead to processes a la 1989-91.
          The provocateurs are really hoping for such a scenario and are pushing it forward in every possible way.

          Quote: Essex62
          If anyone doesn't want to, we'll force them.

          Your compulsion has long since dried up.
          1. +1
            16 September 2026 11: 38
            The best conditions for all citizens without exception were in the USSR.
            Returning our territory and our people home is the bare minimum. Lisbon and the English Channel later. When the Empire gains strength. Or maybe
            they will come to their senses themselves.

            Stalin stopped because the mattresses had nuclear bombs, something we didn't have at the time.

            91 is a traitor on the throne; something like that must be ruled out. It's entirely doable. But if we don't mobilize the country to fight back, we'll be devoured and wiped out as a nation. Is that what you want?

            You won't run to the upper reaches of the earth anymore. The Russian people never lose heart. They will teach you to love your homeland. Russia isn't just millionaires with office workers. There are healthy young people.
            1. -1
              16 September 2026 12: 10
              The best conditions for all citizens without exception were in the USSR.

              In the USSR, until its very end, the issue of housing conditions was the most pressing one.
              We approached the reconstruction with 15 m2 per person.
              Now it’s 30 m2 per person, and during the years of the SVO alone, more housing was built than during the entire Stalinist period.

              Quote: Essex62
              its population home

              Those who wanted to, over the years, found the opportunity to move to the Russian Federation.
              The rest are strangers. Even if they speak Russian.
              (Croats and Serbs also speak the same language, which does not prevent them from being enemies).

              Quote: Essex62
              Among the Russian people

              So you and your comrades are not Russian people.
              You are his haters and enemies, ready to throw him into the furnace of war once again for the sake of your geopolitical fantasies.
              1. 0
                24 September 2026 18: 41
                No, you are not the Russian people; the bourgeoisie has no homeland. Only a purse. am negative
                And the Russians are waiting for us. They want to return home to a united country. Yes, not all of them are ready to make sacrifices; they are afraid of being under the heel of Western invaders, but that doesn't stop them from being Russian.
                1. 0
                  25 September 2026 08: 59
                  Quote: Essex62
                  They want to return home to a united country.

                  Those who wanted to have returned long ago.
                  The rest really wanted and want to be Europe, not Russia.
  15. + 10
    12 September 2026 10: 20
    Quote: Andrey Mishin
    This is how you will learn to love your homeland.

    And why, in your understanding, is the Motherland Putin, Volodin, Medvedev, Matvienko, Shoyga and other unpleasant, not very smart (but very rich, and in your opinion, very smart), but irreplaceable people who have clung to power with their hands, feet and teeth?
    1. 0
      14 September 2026 10: 48
      I completely agree! These are one-day people, with all the ensuing consequences.
      1. +2
        14 September 2026 23: 11
        alas...not one-day ones, but "multi-year ones".
        Moreover, this cannot be changed in any way; we must wait for the healing and inexorable passage of time...
  16. + 12
    12 September 2026 10: 34
    Quote from: Serj Iff
    And another problem: over the past 26 years, a generation has grown up that cannot and does not want to defend its homeland.

    Did it grow or were it raised? Putin deliberately turned people into vegetables, banning opposition parties, destroying trade unions, prohibiting students from participating in political movements, and, God forbid, demonstrators, rallies, and protests. And now you see the blame for the youth who don't want to die under drones in the LPR and DPR for the incomprehensible desires of irreplaceable, alien, and tiresome elders?
    1. -2
      12 September 2026 12: 35
      The problem is that while the sluggish SVO is underway, this kind of reasoning is fine, but when all this mob, and there are approximately 600 million of them, starts flocking straight to the homes of those young people with their mothers, children, and pregnant wives, there won't be any choice. Georgia isn't made of rubber, and it won't escape this fate, just like us.
      1. +1
        12 September 2026 16: 58
        .....when all this mash...

        What kind of brew is this?
        1. -1
          13 September 2026 00: 59
          Quote from Pembo
          .....when all this mash...

          What kind of brew is this?

          He's delirious, the poor thing.
          1. 0
            13 September 2026 12: 17
            Are you a universal human being? Haven't you noticed there's a war going on? It's only on the outskirts for now, but it'll soon roll over to us if you keep scattering like cockroaches. Or are you a gay European?

            What kind of brew is this? I understand, this word is unfamiliar to the victims of the EG. You don't read books, do you?
          2. 0
            13 September 2026 15: 08
            The poor thing is delirious.

            The poor thing wanders...
        2. 0
          13 September 2026 12: 15
          And the same one that comes to us every 100+ years to rob. The time has come just right. They don't even try to hide it, they say it outright.
          1. 0
            14 September 2026 23: 01
            Still, please explain: should this brotherhood (did I understand the meaning of "brew" correctly?) come from the west or from the south?
            1. 0
              16 September 2026 08: 16
              Well, it will come from all sides. The West will grind it down, the South won't give up its piece. But it will start, as always, from the West.
  17. +4
    12 September 2026 10: 58
    Russian Armed Forces personnel in the SVO work. The word "work" is used by authorities at all levels. A contract is an agreement to perform work. Terms like "fatherland," "patriotism," and so on don't apply here. Capitalism.
    1. -4
      13 September 2026 19: 29
      So, all the SVO fighters are now fighting only for money, with zero patriotism? That's the most blatant and obvious lie that only communists are capable of.
      1. +1
        15 September 2026 13: 01
        Mr. Mishin, Yeltsin liquidated the communists. There have been no communists in Russia since then. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation is a bourgeois left-wing social democratic party, of which there are plenty in the world. You call oligarchs, factory owners, ship owners, and store owners communists. Ridiculous.
        1. +3
          16 September 2026 08: 18
          There are communists in Russia, but they don't have a party. And they won't let them create one, let alone get even a percentage of the State Duma.
  18. +8
    12 September 2026 12: 22
    Are there really people who accept the Commander-in-Chief's statements as truth? Our Commander-in-Chief is the Commander-in-Chief of all Commanders-in-Chief, and if he has to lie to achieve his goals, he'll do it—the goal is what matters! It's too bad we don't know these goals.
  19. -3
    12 September 2026 13: 36
    Quote: Ales
    he will do it - the main goal!

    Yeah, it was the Jesuits who started it, wasn't it? "The end justifies the means." Then the Bolsheviks chimed in, "We will lead humanity to happiness with an iron fist." Did they? Now here's a new Putinist reincarnation of this nonsense—like, we know where the end is and we won't consult with you sheep.
    1. 0
      16 September 2026 08: 22
      They brought us. But this happiness wasn't to the liking of the self-seeking speculators. And considering we were the only ones like that, and there were many of them abroad, who tried very hard to ruin our happiness, with the help of people like you, it worked out temporarily.
  20. +1
    12 September 2026 13: 41
    Quote: Essex62
    approximately 600 million will go straight to those young people's homes

    Well hello...Okay, all these analog networks are dummies, but I hope those 5000 nuclear heads haven't all rusted out?
    Even Kim isn't approached for a few hundred warheads.
  21. 0
    14 September 2026 10: 45
    There is no worse enemy than the boss of...
  22. -1
    15 September 2026 12: 37
    This is all empty talk. Mobilization can be declared at any moment, without any scenarios. And it won't affect the election results in any way.