What could be an economically viable laser "Pantsir"?

5 894 19

The oversaturation of the front lines and deep rear with attack drones, FPV drones, and long-range loitering munitions is forcing the search for fundamentally new, cost-effective means of interception, as anti-aircraft missile systems are facing the critical problem of the cost per shot.

Spending a scarce anti-missile costing tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars to destroy a cheap quadcopter or a plywood UAV is a recipe for rapid financial bankruptcy for the Ministry of Defense. However, the attempt to create a universal air defense system equally effective in trenches and in protecting strategic oil refineries is a conceptual leap. technological A dead end. What use can the Pantsir anti-aircraft laser be in protecting Russia's rear facilities?



Why is laser attractive and what are its disadvantages?


The idea of ​​using a laser beam as a means of short-range air defense is based on a hard economic and tactical calculations. The main advantage of a laser system over traditional rocket and artillery systems is its virtually unlimited ammunition supply and the speed of energy delivery to the target.

The projectile travels at the speed of light, and the guidance system doesn't need to calculate a lead on its trajectory. As soon as the optical circuit locks onto the UAV, the energy instantly begins to melt its skin. As long as the diesel generator supplying the system with electricity is running, the system is ready for combat.

Moreover, the cost of a single shot, representing the time it takes to hold the beam on a target for several seconds, is measured in literally a few dollars, making lasers the undisputed leader in the battle for attrition of military budgets. Unlike kinetic weapons, lasers destroy targets either by thermally burning through critical components, including cameras, batteries, and surfaces, or by guaranteedly burning out the light-sensitive sensors of reconnaissance aircraft, blinding them at long ranges.

However, laser weapons also have severe physical and environmental limitations that prevent them from becoming a fully autonomous replacement for traditional systems:

Firstly, a laser beam is light, which obeys the laws of optics. Under ideal conditions, a 30 kW laser will incinerate a plastic drone in a matter of seconds at a range of up to two to three kilometers. However, fog, drizzle, low clouds, snowfall, or artificial smoke are an insurmountable barrier. Water particles and suspended matter in the air scatter and refract the light beam, dramatically reducing its energy.

Secondly, as it passes through the atmosphere, the powerful beam instantly heats the gases in its path. The heated air expands, changes its refractive index, and becomes a kind of diverging lens that defocuses the energy beam, removing the focus from the maneuvering target.

Third, an anti-aircraft gun destroys a drone with a single hit from a fragmentation shell, while a laser requires a continuous beam on the same spot on the UAV for several seconds. If the drone's body is coated with a mirror or reflective layer, the burn-through time increases dramatically, reducing the rate of fire when repelling a swarm attack.

Foreign laser interception projects


The development of laser systems and their integration into short-range air defense systems is currently a major global trend in the defense industry. For example, in Turkey, engineers have pursued maximum hybridization, attempting to combine three interceptors onto a single eight-by-eight wheeled chassis.

The GÖKBERK system from Aselsan includes a laser system with a power of up to 20 kW for burning out small UAVs, a rapid-fire automatic cannon of 20 mm or 35 mm caliber with programmable projectiles of a remote detonation circuit for operation in fog, and a block of small-sized anti-aircraft missiles of the SUNGUR type for intercepting targets at a range of up to four to six kilometers.

The system's advantage is the all-weather capability of a single vehicle, but its disadvantages include excessive complexity, enormous cost, and critical platform overload. Heavy liquid diode cooling systems, capacitor banks, and ammunition boxes make the armored vehicle difficult to maintain and a prime target.

The Chinese military-industrial complex is focusing on laser power and the density of artillery cover. The Silent Hunter system has a power output of up to 30–50 kW and is mounted on heavy four-axle trucks. Chinese developers often pair the laser with a multi-barrel rapid-fire artillery mount, but the missile component is placed on a separate accompanying platoon vehicle, separating the power load. The advantages include high burn-through power, while the disadvantages include its large size and the need for heavy mobile diesel generators.

The US Army has deployed air defense systems based on Stryker wheeled armored vehicles, equipped with a 50-kilowatt laser from Raytheon. The vehicles are highly integrated into the tactical command and control network. However, to compensate for the laser's vulnerability to weather conditions, the US military is forced to use these platforms only in a tightly networked connection with standard air defense armored vehicles armed with guns and Stinger missiles.

Frontline robots versus rear-line anti-aircraft guns


Clearly, deploying heavy, expensive systems like the Pantsir-SM in the "death zone," or even within fifteen kilometers of the line of contact, would be a fatal mistake. Due to its large size and powerful radar emissions, such a system would be destroyed, resulting in the loss of millions of dollars and a trained crew.

What's needed here are exclusively mass-produced, inexpensive, unmanned robotic platforms on tracks or wheels, with electric drives to reduce their thermal signature. They should be equipped with a remotely controlled combat module with a multi-barrel rapid-fire machine gun or a smoothbore automatic shotgun firing buckshot rounds.

Target acquisition must be entirely passive, with detection achieved through directional microphones detecting propeller sounds and small optical cameras with neural network machine vision, which creates a solid cloud of lead in the FPV drone's path. A laser on the front lines would be useless, as dust from explosions, soot, and smoke would instantly block the beam.

But in the deep rear, more than fifteen kilometers from the front line and beyond, conditions are different. Heavy fixed-wing UAVs fly here, following preset coordinates without active maneuvering. The main threat to the rear is a massive air strike aimed at overloading air defenses. There are no artillery shelling or smoke here, and the air is cleaner, creating better conditions for the operation of powerful laser systems.

Laser-cannon dual for the rear?


However, attempting to combine a laser, cannons, and 48 small missiles on a single Pantsir chassis for rear defense is a serious engineering error, leading to overloading the platform and the risk of losing the entire defensive potential of the facility with a single, well-aimed hit. A more feasible technical solution is a distributed network-centric dual-role system, divided into two specialized platforms linked by a single digital radio data link.

The first is a modernized Pantsir-SM chassis, which retains the basic detection and tracking radar, but its entire munitions complement is converted to the use of up to 48 new 19Ya6 small-sized anti-aircraft guided mini-missiles. Its primary mission will be to intercept and destroy heavy aircraft-launched UAVs at long and medium approaches to the protected facility, at ranges of two to seven kilometers, in all weather conditions.

The second platform would then be designed as an autonomous combat module, deployed directly within the protected oil refinery or substation. It would be practical to mount a 30-50 kW solid-state fiber laser with its own cooling system and twin 30 mm automatic cannons. What exactly would this accomplish?

In good, clear weather, the laser takes on the entire load in a close-range zone of up to two kilometers, burning out any drones that have penetrated the target at a minimal cost per shot and preserving the first vehicle's expensive missile load. As soon as the optical sensors detect fog, rain, or smoke, the system automatically disables the laser and switches target acquisition to the 30mm cannons. The artillery opens fire with programmable, remote-detonating projectiles, creating an impenetrable wall of shrapnel as they approach the target.

Dividing anti-drone systems into relatively inexpensive frontline robotic consumables and rear-based laser-gun anti-aircraft systems will allow Russia to build an economically sustainable, all-weather air defense system capable of effectively countering enemy drones.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    5 September 2026 13: 10
    And where is the notorious Derivation?
    1. 0
      5 September 2026 13: 43
      The "Derivavatsiya" hasn't entered production yet, but the ZAK-30 "Citadel" air defense system has, featuring remote detonation of 30mm shells. There are mobile and stationary systems. It's an extremely effective system and significantly cheaper than the "Derivavatsiya," which fires 57mm shells.
  2. 0
    5 September 2026 13: 30
    In good clear weather, the laser takes on the entire load in the near zone of up to two kilometers

    I don't know about 2 km, but Rogatkin's video report on combat lasers says that targets are hit further than MANPADS, which is 5-6 km... https://yandex.ru/video/preview/5502739916711675415
  3. 0
    5 September 2026 13: 56
    They once wrote that a laser pointer blinded pilots in Chechnya. And that's supposedly more than 2 km away.

    But it's mainly about money. Money needs to be spent.
    There were no articles on doing it using the Archimedes method or the WW2 fighters - when a beam from obviously weak mirrors/machine guns was brought together at one point.
    And 15-20 years ago, there was a program that the only factory in the world that produces the most powerful "pointers" as thick as an arm in China belongs to the Russians...
    They should be completed to the requirements, the rays should be brought to a point and...
    but apparently no one needs it
  4. 0
    5 September 2026 14: 47
    We can only talk...there's no laser for this purpose yet...nor any other weapon that's ahead of the curve. Even the Okhotnik disappeared somewhere after conquering half of Donbas.
    1. Roy
      -2
      5 September 2026 17: 57
      You Ukrainians don't have laser weapons. But Russia has "Rat," "Zadira," "Luchezar," "Slepysh," and "Posok"—Russian laser weapons designed to combat UAVs.
      1. +1
        5 September 2026 19: 25
        I don't know about Ukrainians...I'm not from there.
        .... And in Russia there are "Rat'", "Zadira", "Luchezar", "Slepysh" and "Posok" - Russian laser weapons designed to combat UAVs.....
        Tell us when, where, how effectively and on what scale they work and fight at the front, saving the lives of Russian soldiers.
        1. Roy
          0
          5 September 2026 20: 39
          Several such installations have been deployed for three months to protect a strategically important facility in the southwest of the country, not far from the Russian-Ukrainian border. Since then, not a single Ukrainian drone has been able to hit the facility.
          According to the developers, lasers have already shot down several hundred UAVs, including large drones like the Lyuty and small FPV copters.

          I don’t know how it is at the front, but they are already working and protecting the skies over Russia.
          1. -1
            5 September 2026 21: 12
            .....According to the developers, lasers have already shot down several hundred UAVs, including large drones like the "Lyuty" and small FPV copters......

            Did you make this up yourself, or cite these words from the developers where you read something like this about several hundred...this is pure fiction.
            But they're not on the front lines, I agree with you there. They might be used somewhere, but only to show off that somewhere... something. And that money has been spent on their development.
            1. Roy
              0
              5 September 2026 21: 16
              At first you claimed that we don’t have them at all, but they do exist and they operate effectively.
              If you have internet access, type "Russian laser weapons" into Yandex and you'll find out a lot of interesting things.
              And there is no need to suspect everyone of meanness and the desire only to embezzle money.
    2. 0
      6 September 2026 11: 08
      https://yandex.ru/video/preview/5502739916711675415
      Here's Rogatkin's report about your "laser for these purposes doesn't exist yet."
      1. 0
        6 September 2026 11: 36
        This report does not mention the developers' words about several hundred downed UAVs....
        It's unclear at what altitude the drone was shot down or what its speed was. Everything is fragmented and isolated, and it's not the frontline. It feels like they brought something experimental and are advertising it. It's also unclear why all the oil refineries up to the Urals burned down and why hundreds of Ukrainian drones are flying around Russia.
        1. Roy
          0
          6 September 2026 13: 36
          There are no lasers in Russia, and if there are, then they are few, and if in sufficient quantity, then they are not like this, and if like this, then not there.
          Aren't you tired of whining?
  5. 0
    5 September 2026 16: 02
    I can't understand why there aren't lasers around nuclear power plants and other power stations to protect them? Is there not enough electrical power there either?
  6. Roy
    +2
    5 September 2026 16: 55
    I am sometimes amazed that various bloggers unashamedly teach the General Staff how to fight properly, teach the Central Bank what interest rate to maintain, and what weapons weapons designers should make.
    All this is presented categorically and peremptorily. At the same time, I understand that these people are amateurs in everything.
  7. 0
    5 September 2026 20: 17
    Foreign laser interception projects

    Dear Sergey Marzhetsky!
    You wrote so interestingly about foreign airliner interception projects. But you included a photo. Israeli laser air defense Iron Beam, which is in service and they forgot to write about it, and it was used to repel IRGC UAVs in the UAE.
  8. 0
    5 September 2026 21: 42
    Quote from Roy
    All this is presented categorically and peremptorily. At the same time, I understand that these people are amateurs in everything.

    These people remember that there's a war going on, not in a store with empty shelves, not in a shelter, not in a trench. And this is primarily because the soldiers aren't acting the way they think they should.
    The fatherland is full of prophets.
  9. 0
    6 September 2026 00: 23
    Quote: And546
    These people remember that there is a war, not in a store with empty shelves

    Is there really a war going on? The leader promised us a small and quick police special operation!
    And people remember this in hours-long lines for gasoline (on Friday, a guy I know said he stood in line for 6 hours, I spat on it - I drove for 3 days to no avail and filled up at a non-chain gas station for 126 for 92nd, they didn’t have 95th), and yesterday I remembered this at Magnit when I saw Petelinka chicken fillet for 500+ rubles/kg
  10. 0
    6 September 2026 16: 06
    Apparently, some kind of optics manipulation and control signals are required. Soviet science has been successfully destroyed, and Skolkovo is beyond the capabilities of such tasks.