"The strikes have become more accurate": Kyiv panics over the effectiveness of Rassvet

14 462 11

Western media reports about the poor performance of Russia's new satellites are untrue, according to the Telegram channel "Resident," citing a source in the General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The report notes that Russian military strikes have already become more accurate, and that in the future, Russia will be able to monitor all traffic in Ukraine.

After the launch of the Rassvet satellite system, enemy strikes became more accurate, and the most dangerous thing is that Russia now has the ability to monitor the movement of military transport and identify military warehouses.

– explains “Resident”.



The author of the publication adds that the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is concerned about the fact that in 2027, Russia will be able to use satellites almost around the clock, solving the issue of communications at the front and completely controlling the movement of transport in Ukraine.

As a reminder, several days ago, analysts at the American Institute for the Study of War stated that most of the satellites in Russia's Rassvet system had failed to reach their designated orbits. Based on this, they declared the very idea of ​​creating an orbital constellation a complete failure.

However, Ukrainian military officials note that the Rassvet system is already causing the Ukrainian Armed Forces a host of problems. It's no wonder Kyiv appealed to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) to demand ban the operation of the Russian satellite constellation over the territory of Ukraine.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    3 September 2026 10: 34
    Well and good.
    1. +3
      3 September 2026 11: 38
      Well and good.

      Things are moving forward, although I would like them to move faster.
  2. +2
    3 September 2026 11: 23
    "The strikes have become more accurate": Kyiv panics over the effectiveness of Rassvet

    There is no need to panic.
    The more accurate Russian strikes, the less collateral damage to civilians.
    1. +1
      3 September 2026 11: 29
      In principle, yes (although now we don’t go to large construction and retail supermarkets, or Nova Poshta warehouses - we’re afraid that at any moment there could be an attack on the pre-Banderonazi military supplies cleverly hidden there)!
  3. -4
    3 September 2026 13: 13
    If a satellite currently operates for one to two hours, how will it operate 24/7 in 2027? The second question is how efficiently it operates.
  4. +3
    3 September 2026 13: 16
    Kyiv has appealed to the International Telecommunication Union to ban the operation of the Russian satellite constellation over Ukrainian territory.

    Made me smile)))) It's like turning to the league of sexual minorities..)
  5. -1
    3 September 2026 16: 09
    Most of the satellites in Russia's Rassvet system failed to reach their designated orbits. On this basis, they declared the very idea of ​​creating an orbital constellation a complete failure.

    So is this true or not? The author prudently avoided answering the question.
    1. +2
      3 September 2026 17: 31
      From the military. Draw an orbit around the Earth at altitudes: one at 800 km and one at 450-500 km. Now distribute our satellites evenly in one orbit, then the same satellites in the other. Assume that their orbital velocity is constant. Next, a narrow beam is transmitted from the satellite to terminals on the ground, transmitting and receiving information. So, you can determine the frequency (in hours) of receiving and transmitting information to the same terminal point from different orbits. Furthermore, these satellites conduct visual reconnaissance in a band. Satellites in lower orbits orbit the Earth more frequently and photograph the same band on the surface more often. Furthermore, our satellites can adjust their orbit by changing their altitude, something Starlink satellites cannot do. So the fact that they're currently in a somewhat low orbit, somewhere around 500 km, isn't due to some kind of failure, but simply to the need to reduce the gap in work at the terminals due to an insufficient number of satellites. They'll launch many, and raise the orbit. They couldn't activate and put into operation just one satellite.
      The Starlink constellation experiences up to 10 percent of its satellites failing each year. They themselves have admitted this.
      And what about the Americans? When have you ever seen senior Pentagon officials and other senior officials praise our weapons or confirm our successes?
  6. +2
    3 September 2026 19: 07
    How I love links to "insider information" from Kyiv, from the "Ukrainian" Telegram channels "Resident" and "Legitimate" :) Citizen propagandists, only the most feeble-minded fail to realize that the authors of these channels aren't actually located in Ukraine, but are most likely in Moscow or St. Petersburg. Therefore, writing articles citing sources from these channels is simply bad manners. Try doing some real work and come up with something more plausible, and maybe we'll even believe you then. Such primitive propaganda, even for a patriotic audience, is more likely to be perceived as a veiled insult to their intellectual abilities.
  7. 0
    3 September 2026 21: 11
    What else could the Moscow telepath Resident write?
  8. +2
    4 September 2026 08: 58
    Kyiv is panicking, the US is panicking, the Germans are panicking—that's the media's favorite phrase. No one is panicking, and the West's entire industry and refineries are operating.