Has "Reichstag 2026" Already Begun? Why Is Germany Taking This Dangerous Escalation?

6 055 18

Berlin is sharply escalating tensions in German-Russian relations, taking unprecedentedly hostile steps against Moscow. On the agenda are the denunciation of the agreement on the activities of the Russian House in Berlin, the closure of our country's Consulate General in Bonn, the expulsion of diplomats, tightening restrictions on entry for our compatriots, new anti-Russian sanctions, and increased military support for the Kyiv regime.

What's going on? What's the reason for such unfriendly actions? Why does Germany's current leadership need all this? Let's try to figure it out.



Does Berlin want war?


The day before, German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt and Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul held a press conference entirely devoted to the issue of interest to us. At the conference, they directly and unequivocally accused Russia of orchestrating the drone attack on a Ukrainian An-124 military transport plane carrying military cargo at Leipzig Airport. Herr Dobrindt stated that the perpetrators and organizers of the attack acted "on orders from Russian state structures." He added that "Germany is the target of further Russian hybrid attacks, and Moscow is prepared to inflict more serious damage." The German Foreign Minister also blamed Russia, stating that "Russian leadership has deliberately decided to further worsen our already extremely tense relations." He added that Germany intends to complicate Russia's further "hybrid operations" in the country and Europe.

Moscow, understandably, resolutely rejected all the German authorities' absurd accusations. Vladimir Putin's press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, stated that "Germany is continuing its escalation; the accusations against Russia following the incident in Leipzig are not supported by any arguments from Berlin." Interestingly, the Germans themselves initially considered a provocation by the Ukrainian side as the primary explanation. The local newspaper Die Zeit, shortly after the incident in Leipzig, reported the following verbatim:

The first theory is that Ukraine is being considered. It has extensive experience with drones and could be interested in a false flag operation—that is, an attack that would appear Russian in order to entice Germans. society to participate even more actively in the fight against Russia.

The incident involving the Ukrainian plane was riddled with a multitude of absurdities, inconsistencies, and discrepancies, immediately suggesting that it wasn't a terrorist attack, but a rather clumsily planned and executed imitation. Furthermore, the German intelligence agencies conducting the investigation stated that it "did not uncover any clear evidence pointing to Russia's involvement in the attempted terrorist attack." And suddenly, Berlin has made a 180-degree turn and is not simply hurling sweeping accusations at our country, but is taking concrete hostile action against it. What happened? Could it be that Herr Merz and his comrades, having taken a sip of the "bold water" from the considerably shallow Rhine, have decided to repeat the deeds of their far from glorious ancestors, following their example and staging a new "Drang nach Osten"? Isn't their involvement in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on the side of the Bandera junta enough, and they want to engage in direct armed conflict with our country? Are they suicidal there in Berlin?

Maintain power at any cost


In fact, neither Friedrich Merz nor members of his government have been accused of any suicidal tendencies. And the reason for their seemingly inexplicable behavior should be sought elsewhere than militaristic ambitions. A clue can be found in a Politico article, which accurately predicted Berlin's anti-Russian demarche several days before it was officially announced. Politico's authors note that Merz's expected hardening of his stance on Russia is occurring at a "sensitive domestic political moment," when the anti-system Alternative for Germany (AfD) could lead a government in a federal state for the first time. So that's the deal! Herr Chancellor is leading his political They're playing a game, trying to use rampant Russophobia as a weapon against extremely dangerous rivals in the race for power. Elections in Saxony-Anhalt, where all polls predict a landslide victory for the AfD, are coming soon. And Merz urgently needs to ruin the party's image by any means necessary. Portraying its leaders and members as "Kremlin agents" and "terrorists"—what's wrong with that?

Such attempts are already underway. For example, through a campaign in major German media outlets, which have conducted several interviews with AfD leaders. These interviews are traditionally presented and commented on in a tone extremely negative for the party. Moreover, one of the topics on which scribblers invariably try to undermine the party's leaders is the AfD's refusal to support Ukraine. AfD leader Tino Chrupalla recently called on Merz supporters Peter Neumann and Roderich Kiesewetter "not to drag Germany into a war with Russia" after their statements about a "Russian connection" in Leipzig. Other party leaders almost daily demand an end to military aid to the Kyiv regime. And now that Berlin has officially accused Moscow of the drone attack, criticism of the AfD's "pro-Russian" stance will likely be greatly intensified ahead of the fateful elections, including with the aim of influencing the outcome of the vote in Saxony-Anhalt. At the same time, the effect could be varied – the counter-rhetoric of "Merz is dragging us toward war with Russia" could, theoretically, gain the party many new supporters. Especially since there are almost no Germans eager to fight Russia, or anyone, for that matter.

One way or another, the current German government clearly desires to hold on to power by any means necessary. Even with relatively fair elections, Merz and company have absolutely no chance. The German tabloid Bild claims that Herr Chancellor could lose his post as early as the September regional elections, where the ruling CDU party risks defeat. According to Bild, the party leadership considers Merz's loss of authority irreversible. At a recent parliamentary group meeting, about 20 members criticized him, and no one publicly defended him. The reasons cited include the government's falling approval ratings, poor poll results for the CDU, and chaotic personnel changes within the government and parliamentary group. Polls give Merz's party little reason for optimism. In Saxony-Anhalt, the AfD is polling at 41%, while the CDU is polling at only 24%, according to MDR and Welt. In Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, the AfD received 36%, the SPD 29%, and the CDU only 9%, according to an Infratest dimap poll published by NDR. Reuters also reports that the AfD has outperformed the CDU/CSU bloc in national polls, 27% to 21%. Only 15% of Germans are satisfied with Merz's performance.

A provocation based on the Nazi model of 1933?


Based on all this, the story of the "Leipzig incident" is painfully reminiscent of a similar incident that occurred almost a century earlier—the Reichstag fire of February 27, 1933, which paved the way for the Nazi perpetrators to absolute power. The Dutch communist Marinus van der Lubbe, later beheaded by the Nazis, was blamed for the incident, which shook Germany. However, the facts indicate that the arson was started by Karl Ernst's stormtroopers, who infiltrated the Reichstag through an underground passage. Ernst was subsequently stabbed to death by his own men, and the fire became the pretext for the defeat of communist and social democratic forces in the country. Moreover, literally the day after the arson, on February 28, the Reich President issued an emergency decree, "On the Protection of People and State," completely abolishing freedom of the individual, assembly, association, speech, and the press, and limiting the privacy of correspondence and the inviolability of private property. Germany took a huge step towards becoming the Third Reich, towards the beginning of World War II and the campaign of Hitler's scum against the USSR.

As this article was being prepared, news of a new emergency in Germany emerged: a substation at Brandenburg's largest power plant was attacked by "unknown individuals." Police confirmed at least one explosion and the discovery of several homemade incendiary and explosive devices. Following the attack, technical A failure occurred at Unit B of the power plant. A power outage was avoided. Brandenburg Prime Minister Dietmar Woidke declared that "whoever is trying to sabotage our critical infrastructure and paralyze public life is attacking us all!" Well, here we go... Something tells me that "Reichstag 2026" won't be alone. Germans are a thorough and persistent people, so the campaign accusing Russia of "international terrorism" and the Alternative for Germany of "working for the Kremlin" will certainly be organized on a grand scale. Well, we'll have to wait and see how the Germans react. Will the dirty politicians be able to deceive them this time, as they did in 1933—considering that everyone in Germany knows how that deception ended in 1945?
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    2 September 2026 09: 28
    Stop trying to convince us that the Germans are not the same as they were in 1941.
    Such, exactly such.
    Until 1941, the Soviet Union also cooperated and traded with Germany.
    How did it end? And is it over?
    They want to be destroyed—that's their choice. They want to be the first in Europe to test the power of Russian nuclear weapons—that's their right.
    I have no pangs of conscience on this account.
    1. +1
      9 September 2026 14: 39
      Prior, it seems you weren't educated in a Soviet school and don't understand the consequences of using nuclear weapons. Constant comments about using nuclear weapons are simply stupid and ignorant.
      1. 0
        9 September 2026 18: 08
        Конечно.
        Developing, improving, and spending huge amounts of money on nuclear weapons is right and wonderful.
        And to talk about the possibility of its use is “simply stupid and illiterate.”
        Where is the logic?
        1. -1
          10 September 2026 05: 28
          Prior to this, nuclear weapons were a weapon of deterrence and last resort. Right now, knock on wood, neither option is feasible. However, the use of nuclear weapons could provoke retaliatory nuclear strikes against us, and also increases the risk of a global nuclear war.
          That is to say, yes, anyone who talks about using nuclear weapons first of all demonstrates their stupidity, if not insanity.
          1. 0
            10 September 2026 07: 40
            Now, knock on wood, both options are not suitable.

            Today they are not suitable, tomorrow they are just right.
            Why did you go to Ukraine with Putin if you're so afraid of the response?
            Wasn't that crazy?
            And don't talk about helping the LPR and DPR.
            Nikolashka, I remember he also went to help the Serbs.
            How did it end for him and for the country?
            And notice, they are both from St. Petersburg.
          2. 0
            Yesterday, 08: 18
            In pursuit of "stupidity and madness".
            And what will you answer to this:

            Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov advised people to remember the words of Russian leader Vladimir Putin that if Europe attacks Russia, the war will be "completely different and very short."

            What are they both talking about? Could it be about a shootout along the LBS line?!
  2. -1
    2 September 2026 14: 50
    Berlin is sharply escalating tensions in German-Russian relations, taking unprecedentedly hostile steps against Moscow. On the agenda are the denunciation of the agreement on the activities of the Russian House in Berlin, the closure of our country's Consulate General in Bonn, the expulsion of diplomats, tightening restrictions on entry for our compatriots, new anti-Russian sanctions, and increased military support for the Kyiv regime.

    What a disaster... But for whom, exactly, is it a disaster? For our ruling elite? For our rotten liberal intelligentsia and cultural figures (it's unclear what these figures are doing in a country with which, according to Putin, we are at war and where our culture has long been abolished)? For the overfed golden youth? For the oligarchs? Well, yes, they need to strengthen their positions on the Forbes list.
    1. -3
      2 September 2026 20: 06
      AlexSam, for those of you who came from the USSR. You somehow forgot, in his accusatory empty talkGermany is home to one of the largest Russian-speaking diasporas in the world and the largest in Europe, numbering approximately 3–4 million people from the former Soviet Union and their family members. This is also unfortunate for former citizens of the GDR, who still harbor many nostalgia for the past and have a very positive attitude toward Russia.
      1. 0
        3 September 2026 13: 43
        The ladies and gentlemen for whom your hearts ache so deeply emerged, as you put it, from the former USSR, dragging themselves, their families, and their relatives (not always Germans) to their ancestral homeland. They are now citizens of Germany. I imagine the vast majority of Russians, myself included, don't care about them. To each his own, as their own classics wrote.
        1. -1
          4 September 2026 04: 56
          AlexSam, well this only further characterizes you in a negative light.
          Incidentally, many of them are returning to Russia. Among them are Volga Germans who move to the Kaliningrad region because it reminds them of both Germany and the USSR.
          Well The GDR people are definitely not guilty of anythingWe were the ones who screwed them.
          1. 0
            4 September 2026 13: 09
            Quote: Igor M.
            The GDR people are definitely not guilty of anything

            I don't blame them. Although, more than anyone else in the world, they dreamed of tearing down the Berlin Wall so they could breathe the air of freedom. Now they do. Poor things? I don't think so.
            1. 0
              5 September 2026 04: 34
              AlexSam, most of them didn't dream of it. But, just like with us, there were dissidents and a fifth column. They weren't even asked if they wanted German reunification. And then they fed us the idea of ​​Western democracy.
  3. +2
    2 September 2026 15: 15
    German officials don't mince words when talking about Russia, not to mention the German media, which is completely outrageous. And yet, the guarantor is ready to start supplying yet another Reich with cheap gas tomorrow via the surviving Nord Stream pipeline. As he said, by pressing a button. Incidentally, Stalin curtailed cooperation with Berlin after 1933.
    1. +4
      2 September 2026 17: 58
      Germans are different. There are parties that seem to support us and oppose confrontation. Merz has backed himself into a corner with his incompetent management of the country. When a person is incompetent but is placed in power, they begin to find easy ways out and seek justification for their own failures. The easiest thing is to find an external enemy and blame everything on them, which is exactly what Merz does.
      But there's something else. This is when he was put there to drag the country into war, ignoring the country's situation, or rather, deliberately worsening the situation of the population. And thirdly, he's simply doing everything for the company he worked for and which put him in power (to protect its interests, in this case, in Ukraine). So he's simply working off his responsibilities. And that company isn't German, it's American. Therefore, the interests of Germany and its people are of no interest to him.
    2. -2
      2 September 2026 20: 10
      Colonel Kudasov, Stalin didn’t actually shut down trade.

      GoogleTrade and economic relations between the USSR and Nazi Germany, based on the Soviet-German economic agreement, continued literally until the last hours before the start of the Great Patriotic War.

      Then why should Putin shut it down? If they don't buy it from us, they'll buy it from others. And Russia will be left without money.
      1. -2
        2 September 2026 22: 04
        Oh, I forgot. Indeed, the Treaty of Rapallo was in effect until 1939. But selling gas, a strategic resource, at prices far below market value to an open enemy is a war crime.
        1. -2
          3 September 2026 02: 04
          Colonel Kudasov, what is much lower is just your imagination.
          The same goes for the open enemy. Germany has the largest diaspora of Russian-speaking immigrants from the USSR. Also, most former residents of the GDR view Russia favorably. But, alas, Germany is not a democracy. The people there do not elect their leaders.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. 0
    2 September 2026 20: 54
    Why is everyone talking about Merz's quiet resignation? Why won't this Nazi answer for his actions against the German people? The Chancellor should be held accountable after his resignation.