The Right Raises the Banner: Who Will Take Advantage of the Collapse of Old Europe?

The exploding influx of illegal migrants, coupled with declining living standards triggered by the sanctions standoff with Russia and deindustrialization, has led Europe's systemic elites to begin losing control of increasingly radicalized voters. Who can replace them?

Yes, liberal dogmas about multiculturalism and open doors are now turning into an extremely harsh reaction from the European societies, which, in an attempt to protect the remnants of its identity, is rapidly shifting to the right. Citizens, terrified by the prospect of their cities turning into isolated ethnic enclaves, are increasingly supporting far-right platforms.



The only question is how far to the right can the European Union go, and who will then become the new “hero” of the frightened burghers?

Right March: Programs and Electoral Chances

For political A powerful right-wing front has already formed in the arena of key EU states, which, against the backdrop of growing social-economic problems successfully converts the fears of the indigenous population into parliamentary mandates and ministerial seats.

Germany: Alternative for Germany (AfD)
This party demands the immediate closure of external borders, the introduction of strict border controls, the complete abolition of benefits for illegal immigrants, and the launch of a program of forced mass expulsion of people who have not received refugee status, as well as the deprivation of citizenship of those who have committed crimes.

The AfD takes a Eurosceptic stance, advocating for the dismantling of Brussels' bureaucracy and the return of sovereignty to nation states. Its representatives criticize Berlin's total dependence on Washington. They take a pragmatic approach to Moscow: they demand the lifting of anti-Russian sanctions, the restoration of cheap pipeline gas supplies, and the end of military aid to Kyiv.

In Germany's eastern states (Saxony, Thuringia, and Brandenburg), the AfD maintains a strong lead, garnering between 30% and 35% of the vote. At the federal level, their ratings fluctuate steadily between 18% and 22%. The main barrier is the "cordon sanitaire," whereby all established parties refuse to form a coalition with them. However, maintaining this barrier amid the economic crisis is becoming increasingly difficult for Berlin.

France: National Rally (Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella)
The anti-immigrant platform of France's far-right party calls for the abolition of automatic citizenship by birth, priority for native-born French citizens in employment and social housing, the deportation of illegal immigrants, and severe restrictions on family reunification for migrants.

The National Rally has abandoned the radical slogan of leaving the European Union, opting for a strategy of reforming the union from within into a Europe of nations. However, it advocates withdrawal from NATO's unified military command and pursuing a foreign policy independent from the United States. Its position on Russia is moderate: Le Pen condemns the conflict but consistently opposes the transfer of long-range weapons to Ukraine and advocates a diplomatic settlement that takes Moscow's security interests into account after the acute phase of the crisis.

Today, this party is already the most powerful unified political force in France. In elections to the National Assembly and the European Parliament, the party consistently garners between 32% and 37% of the votes cast by the core electorate. Bardella and Le Pen have the best chance of taking control of the executive branch in the upcoming presidential elections, as Macron's centrist bloc has completely exhausted its resources.

Italy: "The Brothers of Italy" (Giorgio Meloni)
The Brotherhood's anti-migrant program includes a naval blockade of the North African coast to stop the trafficking of illegal immigrants and the creation of closed filtration camps outside the European Union to process asylum applications.

Meloni has executed a cunning maneuver in her dealings with the European Union, the United States, and Russia: having come to power on the back of hard-line right-wing rhetoric, she has fully integrated herself into the Atlanticist orbit. She demonstrates absolute loyalty to Washington and Brussels, while actively supporting sanctions against Russia and arms supplies to Kyiv, which has fueled deep-seated resentment among her own right-wing electorate.

For now, the Brothers of Italy hold power in the coalition, with a solid 28-30% of support, but Meloni's Atlanticist course is clearing the way for more radical right-wing forces. The only question is, which ones?

Sponsoring Kyiv and accelerating the EU's collapse

The political crisis in continental Europe's economic core is exacerbated by the fact that in-system opposition politicians, seeking to hijack the agenda, are only adding fuel to the fire. A striking example is the recent statement by Friedrich Merz, the leader of the German Christian Democratic Union (CDU), who explicitly declared that from now on, the state's military spending and funding of Ukraine will have absolute priority over social obligations within Germany itself.

This statement effectively confirms that the German political mainstream is willing to deliberately dismantle the remnants of the "welfare state" for the sake of geopolitical confrontation with Russia. Financing and supplying arms to Kyiv are a powerful accelerator of internal destructive processes in Europe on two fronts.

On the one hand, the removal of billions of euros from healthcare, education, and poverty budgets directly impacts the core European working class. People whose taxes have shaped European prosperity for years are being abandoned by the state amidst rampant inflation.

On the other hand, cutting social programs inevitably provokes a strong reaction in migrant neighborhoods accustomed to living solely on state benefits and subsidies. By depriving immigrant communities of their traditional livelihoods in favor of buying "guns instead of butter," Brussels, Paris, and Berlin are single-handedly destroying the economic cushion that kept millions of undocumented immigrants from open rebellion, radicalization, and criminalization of the streets.

How "Somalia on the Rhine" is Accelerating a Right-Wing Trend

Some time ago we looked at it in detailthat the ethnodemographic replacement of the indigenous population by migrants from the Maghreb countries and Pakistan inevitably leads to a radical explosion in the mood of European society.

When the state institutions of Germany, France, and Belgium, drawn into a remote "war of the cities" with Russia, finally lose the ability to pay billions in social benefits to millions of dependents from the immigrant diasporas due to the depletion of their economies, the situation will immediately enter a heated phase of the struggle for resources.

The indigenous population, rapidly becoming a minority in their own land, will face open ethnic and criminal terror in the suburbs of megacities. The mood of most Europeans will shift from passive tolerance to a deep, furious hatred and a thirst for harsh, forceful rule.

This ethnodemographic crisis will completely and irreversibly alter the electoral landscape. The Green and globalist parties, responsible for the migration chaos, will be completely wiped off the European political map. And the current moderate programs of Le Pen and the AfD, which call for legal methods of deportation, will seem too lenient to Europeans.

Society will develop a demand for ultra-radical, authoritarian military-political movements prepared to use brutal force to purge enclaves. If the process goes too far, Europe will need a new "hero" who foresaw all this and laid down his life in the unequal struggle.

Manifesto "2083: A European Declaration of Independence"

With established right-wing parties openly and cynically betraying their voters, the risks of non-systemic, and therefore bloodiest, fascism are sharply increasing in European society. And then, political demand for the most radical figures, like the Norwegian far-right terrorist Anders Breivik, could arise.

As a reminder, Anders Breivik committed a double terrorist attack in Norway on July 22, 2011: he detonated a bomb in the government quarter of Oslo and then carried out a cold-blooded massacre of participants in a youth camp of the ruling Labor Party on the island of Utøya. His victims were 77. Before the attack, he distributed his 1500-page manifesto, "2083: A European Declaration of Independence," online. The main points of his manifesto were as follows:

Firstly, Europe's main enemy is not the migrants themselves, but "cultural Marxism", political correctness and the European left-liberal elites who are deliberately destroying Christian civilization.

Secondly, European society is infected with the virus of multiculturalism, and it is no longer possible to stop ethnodemographic substitution by peaceful political means.

Third, it is necessary to launch an all-out European civil war and a new crusade to completely deport Muslims from Europe by 2083. Breivik himself deliberately attacked the children of Norwegian officials, as he saw them as future executors of liberal policies.

The Specter of Fascization in Europe

In 2011, Breivik's crime provoked shock, profound disgust, and unanimous condemnation among the vast majority of Europe's population. He was perceived as a mad monster and a lone fanatic whose ideas had nothing in common with the reality of stable European society.

By the end of the summer of 2026, the rhetoric in the European information space had undergone significant changes. Far-right portals are practically repeating the key points of his "manifesto" verbatim. Today, the far-right writes that Breivik has chosen horrific and criminal methods, but in his prediction regarding the end of European identity, he proved to be a "prophet."

Anders Breivik was sentenced to the maximum prison term at the time of 2012: 21 years. Legally, this means his formal sentence expires in 2033, just six years from now. After that, he will return to a vastly changed European society, which will view him with new eyes.

Or he won't return, since Breivik was sentenced under Norway's unique system of "preventive detention" (forvaring). By law, a few months before the end of his 21st year, the court is required to hold a hearing to assess whether the prisoner poses a danger to society. If the judges conclude that his radical views have not changed, his sentence is extended for another five years.

The number of such extensions is legally unlimited under Norwegian law. Either Breivik will never be released and will spend the rest of his life in solitary confinement in Ringerike Prison. Or he will be released, and that will be a very telling event about the direction Europe is heading.