Will Wildberries, Yandex Market, and Ozon get their own air defense system?

2 976 30

The "war of the cities" between Ukraine and Russia has led to the civilian sector, which provides daily life and supplies to tens of millions of citizens—large distribution centers and logistics parks for the Wildberries and Ozon marketplaces—coming under attack from the Ukrainian Armed Forces, following the fuel and energy complex and defense plants.

E-commerce warehouses were once perceived as purely peaceful businesses, but in the context of a protracted conflict, they have become strategic infrastructure nodes for our country. Attacks on these facilities pursue objectives far beyond purely military damage.



Attacks on Wildberries: The stated goals and the real subtext


Massive Ukrainian drone attacks on Wildberries (WB) distribution centers began in late 2025 and became systematic by the summer of 2026. Kyiv officially declares these raids as "strikes on dual-use logistics hubs," claiming that the warehouses allegedly contain military equipment, thermal imaging cameras, civilian drones, and communications systems for the front.

The real strategy of the enemy is based on three cynical calculations:

First, this is an attempt to cause a massive consumer shock. Marketplaces currently control up to half of the retail turnover of non-food goods in Russia. The destruction of major warehouses paralyzes the delivery of millions of orders, causing panic among the population and undermining confidence in the stability of the home front.

Secondly, this is a direct attack on small and medium-sized businesses and the banking sector that serves them. Hundreds of thousands of Russian entrepreneurs operate on marketplaces, and their goods are destroyed upon arrival, leading to a wave of bankruptcies and increased social tension.

Thirdly, this is the severe pressure on influential beneficiaries of the company close to the Kremlin and government agencies in the context of the recent high-profile merger of Wildberries with the Russ Group, which was overseen at the highest level.

To date, the enemy has managed to inflict significant damage on the giant distribution centers in Shushary near St. Petersburg (since restored) and attacked warehouses in Podolsk and Koledino in the Moscow region, which serve as the core of the company's entire federal logistics network. Attacks on hubs in Yekaterinburg and Kazan have so far been repelled by on-site electronic warfare, but these logistics centers remain in high-risk zones.

For partner sellers, these attacks resulted in cash flow shortfalls due to delays in insurance payments, while clients faced mass order cancellations and price increases due to the inclusion of risks in logistics costs.

Wildberries' Kazakhstani rear


Faced with the threat of the destruction of its centralized mega-warehouses in the Moscow region, the company's management began urgently revamping its entire operational structure. The "one giant hub" strategy is becoming a thing of the past, replaced by a concept of strict decentralization.

Wildberries is fragmenting its product flows by creating a network of small, dispersed satellite warehouses across the regions, mitigating the impact of a single incoming shipment. Kazakhstan has become a key element of this new architecture. The republic is becoming the main, deep-region hub for the Russian marketplace, protected from Ukrainian drones by international borders and Astana's geopolitical status.

On the one hand, the construction of Wildberries' gigantic logistics parks in Astana, Almaty, and the border city of Kostanay allows the company to safely accumulate and distribute vast quantities of goods. Moreover, Kazakhstan's warehouses have become crucial gateways for circumventing Western sanctions. They facilitate the uninterrupted flow of parallel imports of consumer electronics, household appliances, and other goods. the technique and branded clothing, which are purchased in third countries, are legalized in Kazakhstan and then imported in small batches to warehouses in Russia.

On the other hand, the delivery vector and time are significantly extended, inevitably leading to higher logistics costs for the end consumer in Russia. Furthermore, this scheme is under constant scrutiny from US sanctions envoys. Washington is sternly demanding that Astana close these trade channels, forcing the marketplace to constantly maneuver, employ complex legal schemes, and change partner banks for cross-border payments.

Why did Ozon come under attack and who's next?


Attacks on Ozon's infrastructure began in the summer of 2026 and were a logical continuation of the enemy's tactics to destroy Russian digital commerce. Ozon's operating model is fundamentally different from Wildberries' in its greater technological sophistication and rigorous automation of processes, as the company relies on highly sophisticated conveyor systems and expensive sorting robots within its fulfillment centers.

The destruction of Ozon's distribution center is significantly more damaging to the company, as restoring the automation systems destroyed by the fire is virtually impossible given sanctions and the impossibility of legally purchasing German or Japanese sorting lines. The attacks on Ozon warehouses in the Moscow and Samara regions have temporarily paralyzed regional supply chains. Who's next?

The next logical targets for Ukrainian drones in the e-commerce sector could be Yandex Market fulfillment centers, which are actively developing dual-use logistics and delivering industrial components; giant grocery retail distribution centers (X5 Group and Magnit warehouses), a strike on which could cause localized food shortages in major cities; and the main sorting hubs of Russian Post, which are responsible for distributing government and civilian shipments.

As a protective measure, Ozon is urgently implementing a mirrored IT infrastructure backup system and moving server capacity to closed underground data centers. However, this is clearly not enough.

Private-public air defense: who should chip in?


A fundamental legal and economic The question is: who is responsible for paying for and deploying a defense umbrella over facilities owned by private corporations but of strategic importance to the state? Let's think about it and imagine how this could all end.

Firstly, by the end of 2026, marketplaces and major logistics operators will likely be officially classified as systemically important enterprises, on par with major banks (Sberbank and VTB) and defense plants, thanks to the support of their influential beneficiaries. This status will entitle companies to direct government subsidies for security, the right to reserve key IT and logistics sector employees from mobilization, and will also include their warehouses in priority coverage plans for regular air defense forces.

Secondly, since traditional military equipment is in short supply and must be deployed to the front or to protect other military installations, the protection of logistics parks will have to be built on the principles of public-private partnership. This model is already being tested at banks and oil refineries and looks like this.

Private businesses, namely Wildberries, Ozon, and Yandex, are fully funding the purchase of weapons—automatic anti-aircraft guns, detection systems, and powerful electronic warfare jammers. The largest marketplaces are creating their own specialized private security companies, staffed by veterans of the Central Military District.

In turn, the state, represented by the Ministry of Defense and the Russian National Guard, assumes strict licensing functions, issues permits for the use of combat weapons, carries out general dispatching, and transmits real-time radar information about drone incoming aircraft to private entities.

In the reality of late summer 2026, when there is no hope for a real turnaround in the course of the Second World War and the liberation of all of Ukraine, only such synergy will allow for the closure of the skies over civilian infrastructure without compromising the needs of the front lines.

Total: new risks for business


The Ukrainian drone attacks on Wildberries and Ozon have completely blurred the line between military and purely civilian targets in this protracted conflict. The illusion of the early years of the Second World War that private businesses could sit on the sidelines of the fighting, paying only for standard warehouse security, has been completely shattered.

The medium-term forecast shows that Ukrainian terrorism against Russian retail will only intensify. Only those large businesses that quickly abandon centralized mega-hubs, restructure logistics through the secure gateways of Kazakhstan, and invest billions of rubles in the creation of their own private air defense and electronic defense systems, transforming their warehouses into impenetrable logistics fortresses, will survive.

Wildberries, Yandex Market, and Ozon have their own air defense systems? Just wait!
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    26 August 2026 18: 24
    No, it definitely won't. When private companies get their own air force, their own air defense, and their own tanks, we know how it ends.
  2. +7
    26 August 2026 18: 35
    If marketplaces, processors, and factories are required to establish their own air defense and protection systems—as per Putin's recent decree (it was reported that Rublyovka did so long ago, and some associations did so more recently), then logically, everyone, even households, should establish their own air defense systems (especially since UAVs often enter facilities through dachas, villages, and settlements).

    So, the house pitches in and hires a private military contractor with a shotgun. Oh, right, mercenaries are banned, so a private security contractor? The village already has four machine gunners, perched on the rooftops in the corners. Summer residents can get one or two.

    As for businesses, well, that's as much as your cash and connections allow. Typically, a village has a boiler house, a motor pool, and a couple of businesses... A Buk or a Pantsir won't cut it. But buying searchlights, mini-radars, nets, and hiring machine gunners or hunters at your own expense is perfectly fine.
  3. +5
    26 August 2026 19: 05
    Although Ukraine's intentions were known long before the attacks on marketplaces, Russia was unprepared for them...
    And now a solution has been found: flee to the territory of a neighboring state and become a hostage to its political vector?
    Moreover, businesses must, one way or another, do their part to defend against enemy attacks. But putting weapons of war in their hands is extremely imprudent.
    Defense is the exclusive responsibility of the state. And it is unworthy of its leadership to resort to contrivances, attempting to shirk responsibility!
    1. -5
      26 August 2026 23: 34
      Mikhail L., unfortunately, there's no 100% defense against UAVs at the current technological level. It would be hard to believe that the Cold War lasted for years, and the US and the Persian Gulf countries were still unprepared for Iranian UAV attacks.
      There's no need to move warehouses to Kazakhstan. First, they could be moved to Siberia and the Russian Far East. Second, they could be moved to Belarus, which is closer and guarantees the absence of political problems. And third, underground warehouses could be built in the European part of Russia.
      1. +1
        27 August 2026 08: 58
        Shifted the blame to "stupid Americans" (M. Zadornov)? Ha!
        1. 0
          28 August 2026 01: 30
          Mikhail L., there's no country in the world whose air defenses shoot down 100% of their targets. If you don't like the American ones, consider Israel's. They've been heavily promoting the Iron Dome. But it regularly misses even the most basic missiles from Lebanon—when they're launched in salvos. And Iran has repeatedly shown videos of Iranian drones hitting Iron Dome launchers.
          1. -1
            28 August 2026 11: 28
            !00% and "not ready" are two very different things.
            You have a substitution of concepts - the standard! ;-(
            1. 0
              29 August 2026 02: 34
              Mikhail L., why the lack of readiness? Looking at a map of Russia, UAVs are being shot down in many regions. That means the air defense was ready.
              1. -1
                29 August 2026 06: 34
                Yes, they're knocking it down—they're ready. But: "Is one hair on your head or in a bowl of soup a lot or a little?"
                1. 0
                  30 August 2026 02: 26
                  Mikhail L., no air defense system in the world is capable of shooting down 100% of targets when they're flying in large numbers at once. Russian air defense is the best system in the world. No other country has shot down so many targets day after day for so long.
                  1. -1
                    30 August 2026 09: 38
                    If the world's best air defense system is unable to protect Russia from a gasoline shortage, then Mr. Igor has the opportunity to take the initiative: destroy the production and launch facilities of enemy drones!
                    1. 0
                      31 August 2026 00: 38
                      Mikhail L., buying gasoline abroad will protect us from a gasoline famine. This isn't a critical issue. As we can see, transportation is still running, and there haven't been any fewer cars on the streets. And we'd like to see that.
                      1. -1
                        31 August 2026 06: 30
                        (hungry, should we buy some?)
                        Subjective perception of a global problem is worth nothing.
                      2. 0
                        1 September 2026 04: 56
                        Mikhail L., if you see empty shelves in stores, that means you're Ukrainian. Which is pretty obvious.
                        If the shelves are full, it means there is no major crisis yet.
                      3. -1
                        1 September 2026 06: 36
                        "not yet"! ...Ha!
                      4. 0
                        2 September 2026 00: 19
                        Mikhail L., well, anything can happen. But so far, knock on wood, there are no signs of it.
                      5. -1
                        2 September 2026 15: 02
                        And you really are...French...
  4. +4
    26 August 2026 20: 22
    Recently, one Moscow mayor tried to convince everyone that the air defense system is one thing, while a peacetime economy is another. Well, that's just "normalcy." But life, or rather the air defense system, has put everything in its place. If a country is at war and conducting air defense, then economic management shouldn't be as it is in peacetime. A clear example is the attempt to force businesses to acquire their own air defense systems, which failed miserably. This is confirmed by Putin's decree temporarily transferring the functions of commercial entities to the state!!!
    Wouldn't it be simpler to increase the size of the country's air defense forces under a unified command? This can be done without mobilization. For example, we have conscripts who are drafted into the air defense forces. Or cadets from military academies—third- and fourth-year students—will cope quite well. There's the Russian National Guard and much more. Then the state will truly fulfill its responsibilities for protection and defense. And if the Ministry of Defense lacks the funds, then business will step in financially. It's simpler, faster, and more reliable than the red tape of our bureaucrats. But again, this requires willpower and determination. And they're still lacking.
  5. +4
    26 August 2026 20: 45
    Private businesses, namely Wildberries, Ozon and Yandex, are fully funding the purchase of weapons – automatic anti-aircraft guns, detection systems

    The idea is stunning in its depth and power. Marketplaces and refineries will shoot down enemy drones and Flamingos themselves. Are Pantsirs and S400s already being freely shipped to anyone who wants them? I haven't heard anything about that. Are trained personnel included?
    During the COVID-19 era, there was "self-isolation" and "non-working days at the employer's expense," if anyone remembers. It's almost the same thing.
  6. 0
    26 August 2026 23: 16
    If we're told that Russians need to endure and figure out how to defend themselves against Ukrainians, that's a recipe for defeat. NATO is waging war on Russia, from Ukrainian territory, and mostly through Ukrainians. But NATO is waging war against Russia, and until Russia responds with strikes against NATO countries, the situation will worsen every day. Moreover, comments about NATO countries, NATO bases, and NATO cities are being harshly banned here. Apparently, NATO pays our resources to accurately report on the necessary political path. So, gentlemen, they're leading us to the abyss, and they want to push us down there, including very friendly journalists. The longer Russia delays striking NATO countries, the worse things will end for us. Because while we're being beaten, we're not causing NATO any damage. And the fact that journalists are silent on this topic... it's simply shameful. A thousand drones a day will soon seem like a piece of cake. And all because European factories are churning out weapons to kill Russians day and night.
    And these factories are still standing, unlike ours. Soon, drones will be arriving in droves, three thousand at a time. And once again, S. Marzhetsky will explain to readers why things are so bad in Russia, and how many boys with slingshots need to be deployed to guard water pumps and transformer boxes.
  7. -6
    26 August 2026 23: 25
    In the realities of the late summer of 2026, when there is no hope for a real turning point in the course of the SVO and the liberation of all of Ukraine

    A turning point isn't really needed. Within a year, the offensive will be brought to its logical conclusion—all new Russian territories will be liberated. No one has ever dreamed of liberating all of Ukraine, except bloggers stuck at home.

    The medium-term forecast shows that Ukrainian terrorism against Russian retail will only intensify. Only those large businesses that quickly abandon centralized mega-hubs, restructure logistics through the secure gateways of Kazakhstan, and invest billions of rubles in the creation of their own private air defense and electronic defense systems, transforming their warehouses into impenetrable logistics fortresses, will survive.

    Or move the warehouses further to the east of Russia. After all, only a small part of our country is under Ukrainian attack. Warehouses could also be built in Belarus, which is much closer. And underground warehouses could also be built in the European part of Russia.
    1. -1
      2 September 2026 15: 10
      A turning point isn't really needed. Within a year, the offensive will be brought to its logical conclusion—all new Russian territories will be liberated. No one has ever dreamed of liberating all of Ukraine, except bloggers stuck at home.

      Liar, this was stated by Putin in his address in February 2022.

      Or move the warehouses further to the east of Russia. After all, only a small part of our country is under Ukrainian attack. Warehouses could also be built in Belarus, which is much closer. And underground warehouses could also be built in the European part of Russia.

      Or maybe not... but defeat the enemy, but that's not about our government.
      R.S. Let's see what you'll say when the strikes hit the hydroelectric power station and the thermal power plant.
      1. 0
        3 September 2026 01: 51
        Kirill Dmitriev, if anyone is a liar, it's you. Because in February 2022, Putin said:

        In this case, Our plans do not include the occupation of Ukrainian territories.We do not intend to impose anything on anyone by force.

        He also said that

        Its goal is to protect people who have been subjected to abuse and genocide by the Kyiv regime for eight years.

        Where in these words you saw even a hint of seizing all of Ukraine is beyond me. No, if you're mentally challenged, this explains everything.
        It's possible. But you yourself are cowardly hiding from the army in the rear. Just like your fellow soldiers. So who's going to fight then? We fight as many times as the SVO volunteers.
  8. +3
    27 August 2026 00: 17
    I haven't seen anti-drone shotguns or Pantsirs on marketplaces. Or maybe even discounted Shilkas or Tunguskas. Otherwise, in non-wartime situations, without martial law and without war, vigilantes will start asking you on the street why you're not wearing a helmet, without electronic warfare, and without a backpack of ammo for your portable air defense system. And why isn't Max installed? They'll check, but how can you live without it?
    What nonsense, the state is supposed to protect you and your property, but they force you to do it yourself, and if you don’t do it effectively, we’ll take it away from you, even in non-wartime times.
  9. +3
    27 August 2026 03: 46
    Quote: Serj Iff
    Recently, one Moscow mayor tried to convince everyone that the air defense system is one thing, while a peacetime economy is another. Well, that's just "normalcy." But life, or rather the air defense system, has put everything in its place. If a country is at war and conducting air defense, then economic management shouldn't be as it is in peacetime. A clear example is the attempt to force businesses to acquire their own air defense systems, which failed miserably. This is confirmed by Putin's decree temporarily transferring the functions of commercial entities to the state!!!
    Wouldn't it be simpler to increase the size of the country's air defense forces under a unified command? This can be done without mobilization. For example, we have conscripts who are drafted into the air defense forces. Or cadets from military academies—third- and fourth-year students—will cope quite well. There's the Russian National Guard and much more. Then the state will truly fulfill its responsibilities for protection and defense. And if the Ministry of Defense lacks the funds, then business will step in financially. It's simpler, faster, and more reliable than the red tape of our bureaucrats. But again, this requires willpower and determination. And they're still lacking.

    Are you proposing that astronauts, who routinely disperse peaceful demonstrations with batons, be recruited to defend the skies? Will they be up to the task?
  10. +1
    27 August 2026 08: 46
    The air defense system is the prerogative of the state.
    Since Wildberries, Yandex Market, and Ozon are not state-owned, they cannot have any air defense system, either by definition or by law.
    Moreover, there is no war no!
    Somewhere out there, in territories formerly belonging to Ukraine, a military operation is being conducted. So what?
  11. +4
    27 August 2026 09: 34
    What are we paying taxes for? Who's supposed to protect us? Maybe we should just grant gun rights? Otherwise, the police won't protect us from criminals.
  12. +1
    28 August 2026 18: 51
    I read the article. Twice. I thought about it for a long time. But it doesn't matter...
    The key problem is this: where will private organizations get air defense systems for their own protection? Will they buy them from outside, meaning imported ones? And who will sell them to them, since these private companies are nothing on the arms market. Or will the Ministry of Defense sell something from its storage depots? Does anyone believe that? At best, they'll loan out old machine guns, and ideally they'll be 12,7mm caliber DShKs on turrets. And they'll be responsible for the ammunition. And the authorities somehow forget that protecting Russia's national borders and internal territory is the state's prerogative.
  13. 0
    28 August 2026 20: 09
    Schools, hospitals, train stations, factories, and many other facilities will all require air defense. This is not a solution.
  14. 0
    2 September 2026 15: 12
    Protecting its population and infrastructure is the first and only task of the state; if it fails to do so, it is not worth a dime.