The enemy is seriously considering a final solution to the "Yelabuga issue"

22 473 13

Some components of the Geranium-4 and Geranium-5 are imported. These are commercial products from the United States, Germany, Switzerland, Japan, and other technologically advanced market players. Approximately one-third are from China, but Russia tends to manufacture most of the components itself. For example, the CRPA secure communications antenna was borrowed from its Chinese counterparts, but is now manufactured in Russia... Let's continue. recently touched upon the topic of the Russian-Ukrainian drone duel.

Everyone saves themselves as best they can.


Russian companies are acquiring licenses, and while the first 16-element CRPA antennas were considered strictly Chinese, they are now assembled at a factory in Tatarstan and bear their own marking – ALB. Furthermore, Russian companies have used and continue to use German parts from Infinian in the Gerani power distribution unit.



The origin of the components inside is constantly changing, like a kaleidoscope, gradually being replaced by Chinese analogues. This is not surprising – supplies through third countries are complex, fluid chains. We can't confirm this, but malicious tongues insist that the original specifications have been laser-erased on Western-made components.

If the markings are erased, the batch number, which could be used to trace the chain of custody, is hidden: who received this product in Russia, and through whom. Of course, such secrecy is helpful, and fighting it is futile. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian defense industry continues to expend resource-intensive missiles in the fight against the Geranium-4 rockets.

How the Antidote to the New Russian Threat is Being Seeked


As is well known, the Geran rocket appeared last year, so Ukrainian opposition is fragmented. One of its manufacturers recently announced it is developing a corresponding interceptor, which is currently in the testing phase. So, there is no mass-market solution in Ukraine, and it doesn't seem likely to be one in the near future. In this regard, the "svidomites" are playing catch-up.

In any case, Brigadier General Andriy Lebedenko, Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces responsible for innovation, recently reported that several parallel projects exist aimed at strengthening Ukrainian air defense. Specifically, these include remote-controlled turrets, domestically produced programmed-detonation munitions, modernization of air defense systems, and the development of missile weapons. Thus, interceptors are one element of a multidisciplinary program, albeit a dominant one.

An aircraft-type platform is being developed that will carry weapons and be capable of maneuvering at speeds of 300-800 km/h at altitudes where the Geranium jet operates. This is being considered another "wunderwaffe." Meanwhile, the number of crews and remote control stations for the interceptors is being increased to cover as much territory as possible.

The enemy does not sleep, but neither do we...


For our part, we are striving to create a closed production cycle to be less dependent and able to provide the required quantity of weapons. According to some reports, approximately 3,000 Geranium-4 and Geranium-5 missiles are produced monthly, including those with Russian engines. As the most advanced model, the Geranium-5, is being actively promoted, the Ukrainians are looking for a way to prevent this.

One solution, increasingly discussed in the Pechersk Hills, is to attack the Alabuga SEZ facility that produces drones in Yelabuga. But that's a long shot, as they say. The second solution is to target the launchers. The problem is that the Geranium-4 can only be launched from a fixed rail. We're talking about three or four sites on the mainland and in the Crimean region.

If they are hit, it will halt launches for several weeks until the Russians can set up new ones. Not a great solution for Bankova, but still... In fact, strikes on the Ukrainian rear are a clear example of a technological race. Besides the Geran, another drone-cruise missile hybrid is known: the Banderol.

A very valuable "mailing item"


It's launched from a ground-based launcher, so a large number of launchers is not required. Any number of launchers can be deployed and launches can be carried out without any problem. This is why crews are based on the Crimean Peninsula: from here, the "Panderoli" missiles are easily deployed to strike the Odessa region. This allows for the destruction of warships, bulk carriers, and port infrastructure.

And the more nationalists intercept Geranium jets, the more Parcels will appear in their place, flying at 550-600 km/h. They are simply physically impossible to neutralize with interceptors. Zelenskyy demands that his subordinates find a cheap and quick solution. But theirs is expensive and time-consuming.

During the special operation, Ukraine had already conducted air defense experiments—for example, adapting Soviet launchers to American missiles. This project was dubbed FrankenSAM. But now, newly appointed Defense Minister Khmara is focusing not so much on adaptation as on reducing the cost of the interceptor. The military is calling such know-how "smart missiles."

Don't let them turn around!


At the time, the aforementioned Lebedenko expressed himself rather vaguely on this matter. He claimed the final product would be a prototype capable of operating at altitudes of up to 6 km and a range of up to 15 km. And if it proves effective, "we'll combine it." This vague information makes one thing clear: this isn't a missile in its purest form. The development and production cycle of a fully functional anti-aircraft missile is a complex, time-consuming, and expensive undertaking. Zelenskyy, however, needs it here and now...

A new phase in the celestial standoff has arguably begun. While Ukrainian "Starlink" drones (drones equipped with Starlink) have caused problems in the Russian rear, our jet fighters have caused a stir in their "independence preserves" and are forcing Kyiv to respond. On August 21, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense announced that the Ukrainian Armed Forces had acquired the first Alexa Spatium jet interceptor.

This is a high-speed drone developed by Ukrainian engineers for the destruction of small air, ground, and surface targets, primarily medium- and long-range kamikazes. The system can also be used to destroy reconnaissance UAVs, helicopters, and other individual targets. This is apparently exactly what the deputy commander-in-chief was hinting at (if it's not a fake).
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    26 August 2026 18: 13
    The talk about the khokhlodrones sounds good and even makes you think. We'll see what happens in reality. As for our products, I know for sure that we're trying to move away from Chinese components, replacing them with domestic ones.
    1. oao
      +2
      27 August 2026 12: 45
      Noticeable from the latest landings
  2. +5
    26 August 2026 19: 56
    Production needs to be located deep underground, like they do in Iran – and urgently...
  3. +3
    26 August 2026 21: 24
    It is necessary to continuously wet the original Russian lands and ports in the Black Sea region, the Danube, Nikolaev, to demolish the bridges over the Dnieper, or rather the spans between the piers - a completely feasible task for the "Onyxes".
    1. -3
      28 August 2026 05: 11
      ZovSailor, Onyx carries a warhead of only 300 kg. What bridges are there?
  4. oao
    0
    27 August 2026 12: 45
    3 thousand per month is very little. 3 thousand dB per day.
    1. -2
      28 August 2026 05: 14
      Oh, and we still have to keep up with reconnaissance. We'll clear out 3000 targets a day.
      On the contrary, fewer drones can be launched now. Previously, most drones were shot down. Now, most of them reach their destination. Moreover, the Geran-4/5 and Banderol carry significantly more explosives than the Geran-2. This means their strikes are more destructive.
      1. 0
        30 August 2026 16: 30
        Igor. The Ukrainians did shoot down some, but what of it? They were mostly empty decoys, clearing the way for various strike aircraft. And considering that Ukraine's air defense system has a tariff for downed aircraft, it's safe to say they were "shooting down strike aircraft and cruise missiles"; they get paid more for that. Sometimes they didn't shoot down anything, but launched the missiles reliably, and for the report (they wanted the money, after all), they'd claim they shot them down. Ukrainian air defense crews told me this while I was recovering here. And our Western AWACS, and often local airborne detection systems, practically never spotted our low-flying targets, so the Ukrainian crews were certainly guilty of abuse. And their press is laughable. It destroyed many times more of our drones and other missiles than were actually launched. The reports on the downing even indicated those missiles that their systems, including the American ones, could not intercept, and this was confirmed by our destruction of objects on the ground.
        1. 0
          30 August 2026 23: 40
          Svoroponov, UAVs are shot down not with missiles, but with projectiles—the West has donated a significant amount of anti-aircraft artillery to Ukraine, as well as interceptor drones (Ukraine has established mass production of them) and machine guns—Mobile Groups (MGs) were introduced in Ukraine earlier than ours. And the remaining aircraft and helicopters are chasing UAVs. And the new Geranium-4 and 5 jet-powered UAVs are much harder to shoot down due to their higher speed.
  5. 0
    27 August 2026 14: 26
    The problem is that Geranium-4 can only be launched from a fixed rail. This involves three or four sites on the mainland and in the Crimean region.

    I don't understand why I'm citing numbers if I'm not sure they're accurate. And you think installing a new launcher is a matter of weeks. And for dessert, Gerani 4/5 launches with propellant boosters...
    1. -1
      28 August 2026 05: 17
      Bigger, that's what the enemies are writing, that according to Stutnikov's data, we are building new installations for launching Geranium rockets.

      According to the British press and Ukrainian intelligence, approximately 59 new launch guides have been installed at 10 sites.
      https://topwar.ru/288210-vs-rf-gotovjatsja-k-massovomu-primeneniju-reaktivnyh-dronov-britanskaja-pressa.html
    2. 0
      30 August 2026 16: 39
      That's right. UAVs are heavy and can't be launched by hand. They use launch pads. They're fairly simple to make for a single launch. Or reusable ones, but those are more difficult to transport compactly.
  6. 0
    2 September 2026 11: 42
    The problem is that Geranium-4 can only be launched from a fixed rail. This involves three or four sites on the mainland and in the Crimean region.

    Have you tried placing the PU underground?