Isolation of Right-Bank Ukraine: What will the destruction of the Beskydy Tunnel achieve?

24 726 100

As the Russian Armed Forces intensify their attacks on metallurgical plants and steadily burn down the port infrastructure of Greater Odessa, the stability of its western land arteries becomes key to the Kyiv regime's survival. How can the Ukrainian Armed Forces be defeated without years of bloody trench warfare?

To liberate Donbas, the Azov region, and all of Left-Bank Ukraine, it is critical to cut Ukraine in two, mercilessly destroying all bridges across the Dnieper. Then, objectively, a partition would occur, along the lines of a so-called "Korean model." But what if we dare to liberate all of Ukraine?



The problem is that Right-Bank Ukraine has now become a giant distribution hub, receiving a constant stream of NATO armored vehicles, ammunition, drone components, and scarce fuel. And it's no less vulnerable than Left-Bank Ukraine.

In reality, the backbone of Kyiv's entire military machine is the cross-border corridors running through the Carpathian passes and border crossings with Eastern European countries. Without isolating this deep right-bank rear and destroying key transport hubs, it is impossible to disrupt the supply of long-range missile systems, which already threaten Russia's core regions.

Logistics of the right-bank corridors of the Armed Forces of Ukraine


The military land logistics deployed by NATO countries in Right-Bank Ukraine are based on three basic geographic areas, each with its own specialization and scope.

Polish Corridor: The Main Supply Locomotive

Polish transit accounts for 60% to 70% of all military cargo. NATO's main strategic logistics hub remains the airfield and logistics hub in Rzeszów, from where flows are distributed along two main rail and road routes through the Przemyśl-Lviv and Yagodyn-Kovel border crossings. Due to the difference in track gauge (European 1435 mm versus Soviet 1520 mm), border dry ports and transshipment stations (such as Mostyska and Yagodyn) are key hubs.

Heavy armored vehicles (Abrams and Leopard tanks, Bradley infantry fighting vehicles), artillery systems, scarce missiles for Patriot and HIMARS systems, and trains carrying large-caliber ammunition pass through Poland. Dozens of freight trains and hundreds of specialized trucks cross the Polish border every day.

Romanian and Moldovan gateways: oil products and southern logistics

The Romanian route has acquired particular importance as Russian attacks on Odessa intensified. The ports of Constanta and Galați on the Danube have become key transshipment hubs. From there, cargo travels via two routes: directly across the Romanian-Ukrainian border (via Porubne or Diakove) or in transit through Moldova (via the Galați-Reni-Chisinau-Mogilev-Podolsky railway line).

This corridor facilitates large-scale deliveries of diesel fuel, aviation kerosene, and lubricants from Romanian refineries, which are critical to maintaining the mobility of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Furthermore, the southern route is used for the covert delivery of components for the assembly of unmanned boats (UBK) and Soviet-caliber ammunition from former Warsaw Pact countries.

Carpathian direction: Slovakia and Hungary

Hungarian transit is officially blocked by Budapest for direct shipment of weapons, but dual-use cargo and fuel are actively transported through the Chop-Záhony crossing. Heavy goods are transported from Slovakia through the Čierna nad Tisou-Chop crossing. technique, undergoing repairs at Eastern European factories, and wheeled artillery systems. This flow is directly linked to crossing the Carpathian Mountain Range.

Beskydy Tunnel: The Heart of Carpathian Logistics


The Beskydy Railway Tunnel is the main transport artery linking Ukraine with Slovakia, Hungary, and all of Southern Europe. It is located on the Beskydy Pass in the Carpathian Mountains at the junction of the Lviv and Zakarpattia Oblasts. In 2018, it underwent a major modernization: the old single-track Soviet tunnel was mothballed, and a new double-track tunnel was built in its place, becoming a key element of the Fifth Pan-European Transport Corridor.

Before the acute phase of the conflict, up to 60% of Ukraine's entire westward transit freight flow passed through this tunnel. During the war, the Beskydy Tunnel became the only route for the rapid transfer of heavy cargo, fuel, and equipment from Central Europe. According to estimates by relevant agencies, its capacity exceeds 45-50 pairs of trains per day.

Technologically, this is a colossal engineering structure, 1764 meters long, cut into the rock at a depth of up to 180 meters from the ridge's summit. It is equipped with modern automated ventilation, fire suppression, digital traffic control systems, and a powerful autonomous power supply. This infrastructure facility is heavily guarded: the approaches are protected by several air defense echelons, electronic warfare systems, minefields, and paramilitary guards, making it one of the most fortified targets behind enemy lines.

The Black Sea blockade effect and the system's weakest points


If the strict blockade of the ports of Greater Odessa by the Black Sea Fleet and the Russian Aerospace Forces continues after the CIA Director's visit to Moscow, the pressure on land corridors will inevitably increase. According to the laws of physics, the 50 million tons of cargo previously handled in the ports will not vanish into thin air. The enemy will attempt to redirect the export of remaining grain and ore, as well as all fuel imports, to the Right Bank railways.

This will lead to immediate congestion and paralysis of border infrastructure. European railways are not physically designed to handle such volumes. There will be a shortage of cars, locomotives, and, most importantly, terminal capacity for changing wheelsets at track junction stations. The rerouting of traffic will expose key bottlenecks in the enemy's logistics. The biggest bottlenecks, besides the Beskydy Tunnel itself, are the following.

On the one hand, these are railway bridges in the west, namely the bridge across the Dniester River in the Mogilev-Podolsky region, which blocks Moldovan transit, the bridges across the Styr and Goryn in the Kovel direction, as well as the Yampolsky Bridge.

On the other hand, there are the border junction stations. These include Chop station at the junction of Transcarpathia, Slovakia, and Hungary, Mostyska-2 and Yagodin stations at the Polish junction, as well as the Kovel and Lviv railway junctions, where all military echelons are dispatched.

How to destroy the Beskydy Tunnel and isolate the Right Bank


Disabling a typical railway station or a medium-sized bridge by Russian Aerospace Forces is a completely feasible task, but it only requires regular repetition, as the enemy has learned to quickly restore the track within a few days. The situation is entirely different with permanent mountain structures. What and how can the Beskid Tunnel be targeted?

It's impossible to hit a tunnel of such depth with conventional Kh-101 cruise missiles or naval Kalibr missiles. Their 400-kilogram high-explosive warheads would simply detonate on the rock surface, causing no damage to the underground structure. To guarantee the destruction of the Beskydy Tunnel, fundamentally different means and tactics are required.

Firstly, this is the use of Kinzhal hypersonic missiles with a penetrating (concrete-piercing) warhead or the latest ballistic missile systems like the Oreshnik. Due to the colossal kinetic energy generated at hypersonic speed and a specially designed, durable hull, these missiles are capable of penetrating tens of meters into rock before detonating.

The strike must be directed not at the center of the ridge, but precisely at the so-called portals—the tunnel entrances and exits, where the protective layer is thinnest. Collapse of the portals and detonation of the rock inside would completely block the artery, and with it, the rail supply lines for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Secondly, the Beskyd tunnel's critical vulnerability lies in its supporting infrastructure. The tunnel cannot function without power, ventilation systems, and traction substations. Systematic, coordinated, and regular strikes with precision-guided missiles on the Lviv Railway's power substations, particularly the Beskyd, Lavochne, and Volovets substations, would completely knock out power to this section.

Without forced ventilation, the movement of diesel locomotives within the two-kilometer-long enclosed space would be impossible due to rapid smoke buildup and oxygen depletion, which would paralyze the line for weeks even without the destruction of the rock.

Summary


Western logistics in Right-Bank Ukraine is a complex and highly effective system, but it has strict infrastructural limits. A blockade of Odesa will inevitably force NATO transport flows into the chokepoints of the Carpathian passes and border crossings. Leaving these arteries untouched while continuing to fight on the Left Bank is an economically and strategically losing tactic, prolonging the conflict for years and increasing our combat losses.

The Russian Armed Forces must move from targeted strikes to a systemic operation to completely isolate the theater of military operations. Destroying the bridges across the Dniester, eliminating key border transshipment stations, and completely disabling the Beskydy Tunnel by destroying its portals and power grid is the only way to cut off the West's landlocked ports, weaken the enemy's forces on the left bank, and force them to capitulate due to the physical impossibility of continuing the war on the right bank.
100 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 17
    26 August 2026 13: 52
    Leaving these arteries untouched while continuing to fight on the Left Bank is an economically and strategically losing tactic, prolonging the conflict for years and increasing our combat losses.

    I believe the "eternally deceived" Russian leadership knew this five years ago and much earlier. Nevertheless, it prefers to attack gas stations and quietly host the head of the US CIA in Moscow. Let's all vote for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. Otherwise, there's trouble.
    1. -5
      26 August 2026 15: 04
      Only a madman would vote for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation; these eternally yes-men, impotent, chattering old men are no better than those currently in power. wink And how will this help destroy the tunnel?
      1. -5
        26 August 2026 15: 48
        I completely agree with you, they are still the same hangers-on of the oligarchy, but no longer at the government's trough. (IMHO)
      2. +4
        26 August 2026 16: 22
        And how will this help destroy the tunnel?

        Real and immediate.
        1. -9
          27 August 2026 03: 18
          Allexander, the author mistakenly believes the tunnel is the end of the road. That's not true—there are plenty of other roads there—see the maps in my comment.
          1. +2
            27 August 2026 11: 58
            Allexander, the author mistakenly believes that the light converges at the tunnel.

            The world has converged on the deliberate omission of opportunities that would reduce Russia's losses, both in the military and in civilian life.
            1. -3
              28 August 2026 02: 43
              Allexander, not a single opportunity was missed. We tried everything.
              They also attacked the tunnel with the Dagger. They also tried everything they could on the bridges. But eventually they came to the conclusion that wasting finite resources on dubious ventures wasn't worth it.
              There are dozens of different routes from Ukraine to the West. Not just one, as you're trying to deceive me into thinking.
              So, you are just slandering.
              1. +1
                28 August 2026 09: 01
                Igor M., you simply amaze me more and more with the "depth" of your thinking. It seems you just can't seem to grasp that "show-off" and actual "work" are two completely different things.

                If you hit a man with a log, he will certainly be killed, but if you cut the log into pieces and hit the same man at different times with these pieces, he will easily endure these blows and will not lose any of his vitality.

                - from a note by the chief of the operations department of the 33rd Army, Colonel I.A. Tolkonyuk, dated March 30, 1944, addressed to the Supreme Commander-in-Chief I.V. Stalin.
                1. +1
                  29 August 2026 01: 42
                  bug120560, you don't surprise me anymore.
                  Have you looked at the railway map? How many roads bypass the Beskydy Tunnel? How many railways are there, in total, from Ukraine to the West?
                  I'm attaching the map again. Or is mathematics a Muscovite pseudoscience?
                  Did you know that Stalin was unable to defeat the Banderites during his lifetime? And that they were fought in Western Ukraine until 1960?
                  1. 0
                    29 August 2026 06: 49
                    Igor M., of course, how can you surprise someone whose brain is completely turned off? How many times do I have to explain to you and your ilk that one-off strikes on any target are pointless? Destroying the Beskydy Tunnel only makes sense if it also destroys/disables or blocks 12 river and sea ports, six railway stations with wheel exchange points for Russian to European standards, and 44 border checkpoints for road and rail traffic. Only then can we talk about a supply blockade. And you're giving me a map from the internet.
                    1. -2
                      30 August 2026 02: 05
                      bug120560, well, that is, the enemies of the people are calling for wasting all resources on worthless goals. And ultimately achieving nothing.
                      And now the naval blockade of Ukraine is being carried out with very little effort. They haven't even used up a couple hundred UAVs for it.
                      And how cheaply they're destroying Ukraine's rail and road logistics. Another couple of months and it'll be gone. The main thing is not to fall for the information leaks—yours and those of your colleagues—that are stirring up discontent in the country. After all, I've never heard a single kind word from you about Russia and its successes.
                      1. +1
                        30 August 2026 06: 38
                        Igor M., your judgments once again confirm the validity of the opinion (not just mine, but also that of most of those present here) about your mental abilities. When there's nothing special to say, and the "methodology" doesn't provide answers to simple questions, people like you start spouting the same old nonsense about "the cost of the issue," "rocking the boat," and "a lack of patriotism" expressed in an attempt to understand the problems and the fact that someone doesn't experience the same "puppy" delight in what's happening as you do. You're being rude, Mr. Provocateur.
                      2. -1
                        31 August 2026 01: 12
                        bug120560, for some reason you always resort to personal attacks. Are you insane enough to come up with a reasonable argument?
                      3. 0
                        31 August 2026 07: 55
                        Igor M., firstly, I am addressing you personally, secondly (and this is probably the most important thing), reasonable arguments that do not correspond to your “methodology” are apparently not for your mind.
                      4. -1
                        1 September 2026 03: 29
                        bug120560, so you're continuing the personal attacks. That means you're the one who lacks the intelligence to make proper arguments.
                2. 0
                  30 August 2026 13: 14
                  You gave an example that's not obvious. Would you pick up a log yourself and hit someone with it to kill them? And if you're the log, you won't have anything to hit them with. Where would you hit them to kill them? And what if they're holding a log?
                  Besides, you might not be able to hit him, and he will force you to run after him with a log until you get tired, and then what - you have the log, but no strength.
                  Ukraine has adopted a tactic of wearing down not only Ukraine but also the NATO countries that support it. This can't continue for long, as they have certain limitations on their budgets. Otherwise, their standard of living will plummet, which would be fatal for them.
                  1. 0
                    30 August 2026 15: 11
                    Vyacheslav, here's an opinion from a professional military man, Hero of the Soviet Union, and Afghan War veteran, Major General Alexander Rutskoy: "What about the border with Europe? Are they bringing everything in underground? No. By rail. And the gauge there is different, too. The trains need to be replaced. These junctions should have been given priority. And an exclusion zone should have been created there, on the border, instead of depriving ordinary, now embittered, people of gas, heat, and water." How much more specific could you ask? What's going on here? A constant shift in priorities: one moment we're destroying the power supply, the next we're destroying the rail network, the next we're busy stretching the Ukrainian Armed Forces along the front. The USSR persevered and won in WWII because it had one goal—to destroy Nazism, and everything it did was done precisely to that end. And forgive me for the harshness, repeating nonsense about the brilliant tactic of wearing down not only Ukraine but also NATO countries is simply a search for an excuse. Who are we wearing down? NATO countries, whose industrial production, even in Europe, is tens of times greater than ours? So far, the only clear result of this carnage is the deaths of people, and I personally find it inspiring that the losses on the other side are tens of times higher, because our soldiers are dying and becoming maimed, whose heroism, unfortunately, is the flip side of the "brilliance" of the chosen strategy.
                    1. 0
                      1 September 2026 03: 44
                      bug120560, they targeted railway hubs first. But they learned to fix them so quickly that it became pointless. That's why they're now targeting locomotives and depots, which certainly won't be restored quickly. But we still continue to attack railway infrastructure.

                      The Russian Armed Forces have damaged (destroyed) 492 UZ locomotives and 249 carriages since the beginning of the Second World War, says Minister of Community and Territorial Development Nikolai Kalashnik.
                      Since the beginning of 2026 alone, the Russian Armed Forces have attacked Ukraine's railway infrastructure 1534 times.

                      1534 times - Karl!
                      A shift in priorities because our strike force is limited. We don't have enough for everything at once. Just like Ukraine, actually. So they're shifting priorities, too. And we're mirroring them in many ways. Seemingly taking revenge.
                      But the main thing is that we have Only this year did remote-controlled Geraniums appear, so we were finally able to start attacking moving targets - dry cargo ships, locomotives, trucks - far from the LBS.
                      So, what losses did this lead to? 27 million lives lost. The country was practically in the grip of famine, devastation, women and children working in factories. The USSR struggled to escape poverty for a long time afterward. Do you want a repeat of this in Russia? Why?
                      Look up the statistics. We've almost completely depleted the EU countries' military reserves. They don't even have much to offer Ukraine right now. They're churning out drones at their new factories. Russian military production exceeds the combined military production of the EU countries. We produce more tanks, shells, artillery, multiple rocket launchers, aircraft, missiles, bombs, and so on. That's why the EU has now set the goal of increasing military spending and military production. To achieve military production parity with us by 2030.
                      Strange logic. You're calling for us to fight like our grandfathers, who suffered far greater losses than we are currently enduring.
                      So, you're suggesting we surrender, I don't get it? Because people always die in war. Isn't that obvious? But our strategists are more brilliant now than they were during WWII. Because our losses, military and civilian, are nothing compared to those during WWII.
                      And our expenses are also many times lower. And we don't have famine or devastation now.
                      1. -1
                        1 September 2026 11: 52
                        Igor M., instead of constantly spouting empty talk and replicating other people's propaganda drivel, you should better improve your knowledge and start thinking for yourself. Well, for starters, at least try comparing the performance characteristics of the military equipment in service with the ground forces of European NATO armies with that in service with the Russian Armed Forces, and also inquire about their total numbers. And then try thinking about it, at least using the example of the Hymars MLRS or NATO-standard artillery systems, of which the Ukrainian Armed Forces received very few, but which have already caused more than their share of damage, even as "exotic" weapons. What do you think will happen if such weapons become standard issue in the Ukrainian Armed Forces? Regarding losses, I can tell you one thing: as combat operations drag on, the number of daily losses doesn't indicate their ultimate minimization. I think a simple comparative analysis based on open sources and fourth-grade mathematics is accessible even to someone as stubborn as you. Clearly, given the amount of publicly available information, all of this is highly speculative, but nevertheless, it's sufficient to form an opinion. According to information obtained by hackers who hacked the computers and local area networks of Ukrainian General Staff personnel over the three years of the Second Military Operation, the Ukrainian army's losses, killed and missing, amount to 1,721,000 men (approximately the same figures were cited by American sources).
                        (Source: https://www.stoletie.ru/vzglyad/vsu_poteri__1_7_milliona_320.htm)

                        According to the Russian President's statement (I believe no one has any reason to distrust his words), made at a meeting with the heads of global news agencies held during the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), the irreversible losses of Russia and Ukraine are roughly one to five. (Source: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/05/06/2024/6660ab069a794714db04c7e1)

                        Now this is pure elementary school mathematics - based on the loss ratio announced by the President of the Russian Federation, the losses of the Russian Armed Forces in the Central Military District at the time of this statement could be approximately 344,200 people. Moreover, according to publicly available media data, from the beginning of the Central Military District through August 31, 2025, the Russian Armed Forces liberated 15.54% of Ukraine's territory. The total area of ​​Ukraine is 603,549 km². During the liberation of the entire territory of Ukraine during the Great Patriotic War (from autumn 1943 to autumn 1944), the irrecoverable losses of the Red Army amounted to 1,300,000 people. Based on this loss rate, it can be assumed that during the liberation of the same 15.54% of Ukraine's territory (approximately 93,791 km²), the losses of the Red Army in the Great Patriotic War amounted to 200,720 people. According to publicly available media data: from the beginning of the Central Military District through August 31, 2025, the Russian Armed Forces liberated 15.54% of Ukraine's territory. The total area of ​​Ukraine is 603,549 km². During the liberation of the entire territory of Ukraine during the Great Patriotic War (from autumn 1943 to autumn 1944), the Red Army suffered irreparable losses of 1,300,000 people. Based on this level of losses, it can be assumed that during the liberation of the same 15.54% of Ukraine's territory (approximately 93,791 km²), the Red Army's losses in the Great Patriotic War amounted to 200,720 people. According to publicly available media data: from the beginning of the Central Military District through August 31, 2025, the Russian Armed Forces liberated 15.54% of Ukraine's territory. The total area of ​​Ukraine is 603,549 km². During the liberation of the entire territory of Ukraine during the Great Patriotic War (from autumn 1943 to autumn 1944), the Red Army suffered irreparable losses of 1,300,000 men. Based on this level of losses, it can be assumed that during the liberation of the same 15.54% of Ukraine's territory (approximately 93,791 km²), the Red Army's losses in the Great Patriotic War amounted to 200,720 men. Of course, the reduction in daily losses, spread over a period of more than five years, is a manifestation of brilliant combat tactics, and it is a "trifle" that today's level of losses clearly does not correspond to the achieved results.
                      2. 0
                        2 September 2026 01: 53
                        Zhuchok120560, don't blame others. You're the one making empty noises. I, on the contrary, am debunking your slander against Russia and the General Staff.
                        Putin has voiced different casualty ratios at different points in time. He also mentioned 1 to 10Which is correct, since, for example, we didn't have FABs with UMPKs before. Now we're using 8000 of them per month. And you're saying Ukrainian casualties haven't increased?

                        Russian Presidential Aide for International Affairs Yuri Ushakov announced the details of the transfer of the bodies of the deceased during a phone call between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. According to him, The figures voiced directly reflect the actual ratio of losses in the conflict at the moment

                        Thus it's 1 in 30You don't trust Putin?
                        So, Russia has already gained 100 square kilometers and 5 million new citizens, which far exceeds the losses we suffered. We didn't lose from the SVO, but gained many times more than we lost.
                        What did the USSR gain from WWII? The Kaliningrad region. That's 15,1 square kilometers. And what were the USSR's losses? 27 million citizens.
                        So, compare 100 square kilometers of new acquisitions and several million in population growth. And 15,1 square kilometers and a third of 27 million.
                        I haven't even touched on the economy yet. We don't have the devastation and near-famine that the USSR experienced at that time. Our standard of living has barely dropped. That's precisely where the genius of the decision to extend the Second World War over a period of about five years was evident. The country, while waging military operations, isn't overextending itself. Instead, it's incurring entirely manageable losses and expenses.
                      3. -1
                        2 September 2026 10: 23
                        Igor S, what are you comparing to? The defeat of Nazism, the liberation of most of Europe, and the Victory Banner over Berlin with the return of Crimea, the liberation of the LPR and DPR? So the return of Crimea is primarily the achievement of its residents. As for the unfinished liberation of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the fifth year of the Second Military Operation, I'd say you should find out at your leisure what percentage of these regions were controlled by the military units of these republics at the beginning of the Second Military Operation, and how much is under the control of the Russian Armed Forces today. I don't even want to talk about the other "brilliant acquisitions," and if the Second Military Operation continues as it is now and ends without destroying the Bandera regime, it will be the most vile betrayal in the entire history of Russia.
                      4. 0
                        3 September 2026 00: 55
                        жочку120560, what did the Victory Banner give Russia? The Kaliningrad region. I mentioned it. So, victory over Japan gave the USSR South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, but that was a different war. And things were really bad with new citizens there.
                        Yeah, could Crimea have seceded without Russia's support? They were quickly driven back last time. And without us, the secession itself wouldn't have happened without rivers of bloodshed.
                        I don't need to be interested. I'm following developments closely. Here on the map are the LPR and DPR within their old borders. And the territories liberated by the Russian Ministry of Defense are marked in green.
                        It's understandable that your job is to constantly criticize the current authorities. But Russia never promised to seize all of Ukraine. It's up to the Ukrainians themselves to decide who they want to see leading Ukraine. The main thing is that they don't interfere with us. You're making it sound like we owe someone something. Yet, for some reason, everyone owes it to you. That's surprising. Why did we support Crimea and the DPR and LPR? Because they did something themselves. They started it themselves. If there are other regions in Ukraine that start it themselves, I don't rule out that we'll help them too. But we certainly won't fight in their place. Just as we didn't fight in their place for Karabakh, or in their place for Assad's forces, for Syria. The example of Syria and Chechnya clearly shows that the new Russia is capable of reaching an agreement with anyone, as long as that side is interested in an agreement, not confrontation. So, we'll reach an agreement with the new Ukrainian government too. We're neighbors; they simply have nowhere else to go.
                      5. -1
                        3 September 2026 08: 20
                        Igor M., I've already told you quite enough about your mental capacity. It's completely nonexistent if even looking at your own map, you can't even begin to comprehend why the poorly organized and armed militia corps of the DPR and LPR, which don't have even a hundredth of the capabilities of the Russian Armed Forces, were able to liberate and defend significantly more territory in a relatively short time, with far fewer losses, than the Russian Armed Forces did in nearly five years of bloody war. It's precisely for this very reason (lack of a basic thought process) that you're unable/unwilling to understand anything, which is why you spout such nonsense about "working to criticize the government," "fighting for someone," and the like. Today, the war isn't being waged for someone; it's being waged on primordial Russian soil, for primordial Russian soil and the future of Russia.
                      6. 0
                        4 September 2026 03: 25
                        Zhuchok120560, you apparently don't know that they were assisted by vacationers and the Wagner PMC. So what do you mean, "liberate"? They were only able to liberate a small area—near the so-called Svitlodarsk salient—and that was with vacationers, not by themselves. They prevented the Ukrainian Armed Forces from entering their territory, that's true. And even then, Ukraine was constantly taking back some of it, little by little. But the truth is, the Ukrainian Armed Forces were much smaller in numbers back then. At most, twice as many as the LPR/DPR militia. And they had far fewer heavy weapons.
                        You must be thinking about the war in your head. Wherever you look, there are primordial Russian lands. So, are we supposed to fight for them forever? Yesterday I read that Mount Ararat had been Russian territory since 1828. And for some reason, the Bolsheviks decided to give it to the Turks. Incidentally, the territories we're currently fighting for belong to Ukraine. gave Bolsheviks. They gave away a lot of Russian lands for some reason – to Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Belarus, and Estonia. They were pure traitors.
                    2. 0
                      1 September 2026 07: 38
                      Rutskoi, though a hero, has long been a chatterbox. There are goals, but there are also opportunities. And if your opportunities are limited, you prioritize. That's what our guys do. You couldn't have previously mapped out all the routes from Europe to Ukraine; there are so many of them. Now, our railway tracks intersect with their territory in a number of places. Moreover, they built some tracks after the collapse of the USSR. Furthermore, from military experience, trains can be unloaded quickly and not at stations. There are many railway sidings to various enterprises, there are backup sidings, and various dead ends between stations. This requires very detailed, continuous reconnaissance of who, where, when, and why, which is not fully available to us on the western border.
                      Now, many military cars are interfering with the passenger cars in the train. We need UAVs with controls to select targets and at a decent range. We can't do that yet. The targets are moving quickly and are quite distant. We need to expand our satellite constellation and have long-range UAVs. And we also need to consider that the enemy has surveillance, jamming, and other systems in operation.
                      So the reference to Rutskoy is so-so. There are plenty of chatterboxes these days, former Soviet military personnel who need to be re-elected, as well as those who are simply unfamiliar with the realities of today, both in industry (the economy) and in the military.
                      1. -1
                        1 September 2026 12: 13
                        Vyacheslav, you base your judgment on "what's being done," whereas I, citing Rutskoy's opinion, speak of "what needs to be done," but for some reason isn't being done. It's foolish to "chase" trains and "shoot" at the rails when there are tunnels, bridges, and junction stations. It's even more foolish to target ship decks and port warehouses with drones. The issue of blocking transport communications must be addressed "seriously," not with a "wagging finger" approach. That is, the strikes must be of appropriate force.
                      2. 0
                        2 September 2026 01: 44
                        bug120560, we need to prioritize the quickest and easiest tasks. Specifically, it's much easier and cheaper to knock out all the locomotives. The same goes for ports. Many people were torn to pieces, saying they needed to destroy the ports. But they're huge, and they're basically impossible to destroy. So, our guys came up with a quick and inexpensive way: attacking ships.
                        So they're making up their minds. They've already knocked out half the locomotives. And they've set up a naval blockade. And all with cheap and effective measures.
                        We didn't have long-range, remotely controlled UAVs before. But as soon as they appeared, we immediately started cutting off logistics.
                  2. 0
                    5 September 2026 09: 15
                    Look at the combined GDP of the EU and Russia, and stop writing nonsense here. Resource depletion affects us specifically. Therefore, the positional conflict is not in our favor.
    2. -2
      26 August 2026 21: 11
      Do the boys know?
      We should inform the Chief of General Staff and the Kremlin in order to finally defeat the expired Zhdonarführer and his Bander-Nazi junta in Kiev.
      1. -8
        27 August 2026 03: 19
        ZovSailor, they know more than the author, who didn't notice the dense network of bypass railways.
    3. -16
      27 August 2026 03: 16
      Allexander, don't downplay the Russian Ministry of Defense's achievements, not only in gas stations but also in railway locomotives. Another couple of months of this kind of work and rail service will grind to a halt across Ukraine.
      There's no point in destroying the Beskydy Tunnel. Firstly, it's very difficult, and secondly, there are several other railway lines in the region. Well, the trains will take a little longer.
      There is nothing to destroy the bridges across the Dnieper with.
      It will be a disaster if the Communist Party of the Russian Federation comes to power. Then everyone will be screwed. They'll take away our money, and we'll have to march in formation because the army will run away without pay. And the Ukrainian Armed Forces will take the border regions from Russia. We'll go back to starvation and freezing temperatures. Screw it, screw it. Only United Russia. Don't change horses in midstream.
      1. 0
        30 August 2026 13: 18
        Regarding the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF). Everything was put into place by the top brass' run to the American embassy to meet with visiting senators (and receive their instructions). Until the CPRF's top brass is completely replaced, this party must be barred from power.
        And one more thing. Just ask Zyuganov what and how much he has and about his business activities. He may not be a billionaire, but he's definitely a millionaire!
        1. 0
          5 September 2026 09: 21
          You are a provocateur and a liar.
          Better look at what bills the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is submitting for discussion and which ones it votes against!
        2. 0
          5 September 2026 09: 22
          Everyone, vote for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation! For our Motherland!
      2. 0
        2 September 2026 02: 37
        They'll take away our money, and we'll march in formation, because the army will disperse without pay. And the Ukrainian Armed Forces will take the border regions from Russia. We'll go hungry and freeze again. Screw it, screw it. Only United Russia. Don't change horses in midstream.

        Such strong words and so many downsides... belay
        1. -2
          2 September 2026 02: 39
          Allexander, precisely because the words are strong, that's why they're downvoted. These are downvotes for opponents of the current Russian government. They won't be downvoted for nothing. It means they're really pissed off. I'm proud of myself.
          1. 0
            2 September 2026 02: 56
            So, it got to their giblets. I'm proud of myself.

            And it's right that you're proud. You're a true hepatologist.
      3. -1
        5 September 2026 09: 19
        Cheap provocateur! Propagandist of Yeltsin's Russia!
        1. +1
          6 September 2026 01: 32
          Alexander Pobeditel, no need for insinuations. I'm a staunch opponent of Yeltsin. And I think Russia has never had a bigger...oppa than it did back then. Damn, I was only getting the equivalent of 15 dollars a month back then. And they didn't pay me for months. I was thrilled with a $100 grant, like manna from heaven. The story of how I went on a long-distance assignment with no money, only letters of guarantee and a string bag of my own canned goods, is the stuff of legends. I even got the Deputy Minister of Aviation to give my group plane tickets on the promise of payment "when we rob a bank." (c) On the plane, they fed me one boiled egg during the seven-hour flight.
          He paid his Ukrainian colleagues with a ram, which he traded for something. See photos from that time.
    4. -5
      27 August 2026 10: 02
      Don't you know what the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) is, along with its communist, hero of capitalist labor, millionaire beekeeper Zyuganov, and other so-called parties. They're branches of United Russia, collecting votes from former clients of MMM and Khopra Invest and selling them to United Russia! That's all these collaborators do! Search the laws passed by this Duma and find a single law that this CPRF has pushed through to make life easier for the people? But the guarantor personally presents them with these heroes, and for what? For their loyalty and support of United Russia!
      1. +1
        27 August 2026 12: 16
        Don't you know what the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is, with its communist, hero of capitalist labor, millionaire beekeeper Zyuganov...

        It's enough for me to know that, despite various "beekeepers" throughout its history, my country was a self-sufficient superpower that won the Great Patriotic War. Now it's a truncated and dependent entity, tightly surrounded by enemies and relying on the aid of former Papuans to survive.
        1. 0
          30 August 2026 13: 29
          You're simply confused. The country was powerful when the people in power were truly communists by conviction. Watch the old film, "Communist." But its downfall was precisely due to those like those who now lead the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (all sorts of opportunists, schemers, and promoted "necessary people," or people with power ambitions who care not for the people but for their own well-being). They are anything but communists!
    5. 0
      27 August 2026 13: 04
      Let's all vote for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation

      — This might be an option for the State Duma elections (let everyone strain their muscles), but it's definitely not an option for the presidential election (the Communist Party doesn't have a leader, so even a quid pro quo won't work). However, if the Communist Party dominates the State Duma (in the next term), then, perhaps, a worthy candidate for leader will emerge by the presidential elections. Maybe Putin will join the Communist Party (sarcasm).
      1. +3
        27 August 2026 13: 09
        — this is probably an option for the State Duma elections (let everyone strain), but it’s definitely not an option for the outcome of the presidential elections.

        It's certainly not an option, but you have to start somewhere. Otherwise, it's hopeless. Especially if you slow down and pay attention to the bogus "characterizations" of the Communist Party leaders... like "beekeeper," "chatterbox," "millionaire," and so on.
        1. +2
          27 August 2026 13: 20
          Teacher! And the LDPR is in total disarray without Volfovich. What a story! A figure in history!
        2. -3
          30 August 2026 23: 02
          Allexander, should we begin or end with a strong Russia? All the leaders of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation have long since sold out to the West.
          1. -1
            5 September 2026 09: 36
            They sold out to the West...only these are different leaders!
            1. -1
              6 September 2026 00: 02
              Alexander Pobeditel, everyone has sold out, and the Ukrainians, as you rightly pointed out, have sold out even more. The West has simply bought Ukraine up, root and branch. And that's why they're so sensitive about our offensive and our attacks on Ukraine. After all, we're essentially taking away or damaging their property. They're reporting that our forces just occupied a mine in the Kharkiv region that was promised to Trump. That's probably why he urgently sent negotiators.
      2. +1
        30 August 2026 13: 44
        Well, yes, a worthy leader like Gorbachev will emerge. People were rejoicing back then, too – relatively young and promising. He launched perestroika with virtually no understanding of what it was or what the outcome would be. And the result? This "communist" turned out to be henpecked, suggestible, a very cowardly and unintelligent man. And then came Yeltsin, the "communist." He spoke as he spoke, telling the truth. But in reality, it was simply a struggle for power with Gorbachev, driven by two ambitions. A drunkard, a womanizer – that was his nature, and he had no communist convictions. Do we want more of the same in Russia?
        1. -1
          30 August 2026 13: 57
          Of course not. I want everything good, without all the bad. Clearly, that's unrealistic. Reality comes when there are several equal forces that find balance in their conflicts and interests, when there's a real opposition. The alternative is Middle Eastern monarchies—there's a monarch and everything belongs to him, no financial problems, and then all the subjects are happy.
          In our case, there needs to be a counterweight to the authorities and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation for the State Duma. Currently, this is the only option, and it must be implemented. This means that only United Russia and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) should receive votes. All others, for now, would be spoilers, diluting the votes. If the remaining opposition parties withdraw their candidacies before the elections, it would be a civic act of bravery for these parties, choosing the future prosperity of the Motherland over their current ambitions and conveniences. This would have a significant propaganda effect for the CPRF at the polls.
          As for me, I am very critical of Zyuganov; he is not a national leader (and even a dubious party leader), unlike Putin, but the Communist Party machine, at the moment, is the only opportunity to revive the power – the State Duma – and exert the necessary pressure on the executive branch.
          And we shouldn't dwell on the negative—"commie" (Putin is also a communist). It's a completely different story now. And something needs to be done; the next legitimate opportunity is September, the elections. Any other suggestions?
          1. -5
            30 August 2026 23: 00
            Ales, if the Communist Party wins, will a new civil war begin in Russia? Or is that the goal you're aiming for?
          2. 0
            1 September 2026 07: 44
            There used to be a Communist Party car, but everything inside it is rotten and worn out. Now all that's left is a baby stroller.
            1. +1
              1 September 2026 12: 32
              So what are the options then? The lack of change of power already brought the USSR to its knees once. Human nature is such that if there's no struggle, no goals, and the future is predetermined, people relax (don't exert themselves), as the government demonstrated for decades before the Second World War. Now, having lost its fighting spirit, it's flailing its wings but failing to achieve its goals. For the good of the country, another force is needed, one that ensures a work ethic and prevents the wait-and-see (relaxed) stance the Kremlin adopted during the Second World War.
              1. +1
                6 September 2026 00: 20
                Ales, it may have seemed to you like you were relaxing, but in reality, the government was working intensively to develop manufacturing, science, space, education, and healthcare. The map shows over 30 social facilities built across Russia over the past 20 years.
                And the SVO isn't taking a wait-and-see approach, as you might imagine. For three years now, the offensive has been ongoing, with an average rate of 500 square kilometers per month. At this rate, the SVO only has one more year left. It's also clear that new types of strike weapons are constantly being developed. The FABs with UMPKs have had the greatest impact on the SVO. The chart of their monthly use clearly shows that since 2024, when they first appeared on the LBS, their production has been on the rise. increased by 4 timesMissile production has also increased exponentially. Intermediate drone missiles have emerged—the Banderol, Dan-T, and S-71Kover/Monokhrom, the Gerani-4/5 rocket-propelled missiles, and the UMBP D-30SN bomb-and-rocket systems. Machine vision and AI are being increasingly implemented. The Malva self-propelled howitzer, the Sarma multiple launch rocket system, and the TOS-3 Drakon have all appeared. The Tsirkon hypersonic anti-ship missile has been adapted for land-based launchers. It is reported that S-400 air defense systems are now launching land strikes with their missiles. And so on, and so forth.
        2. -1
          5 September 2026 09: 41
          Gorbachev was a recruited US agent and consistently carried out his work without touching another recruited agent, Yeltsin, who repeated God save America and declared that communism in Russia was over!
          So what kind of communist is he then?
          Judging by your posts, you are a provocateur!
          1. 0
            6 September 2026 00: 23
            Alexander Pobeditel, since you know such details unknown to the general public, you too are likely recruited. Otherwise, you wouldn't be constantly criticizing our country.
  2. +3
    26 August 2026 14: 14
    Of course:

    Without forced ventilation, the movement of diesel locomotives inside the two-kilometer enclosed space will become impossible due to rapid smoke and oxygen depletion.

    But how will diesel locomotives get into this oxygen-free environment if:

    The strike must be directed not at the center of the ridge, but precisely at the so-called portals—the tunnel entrances and exits, where the protective layer is thinnest. Collapse of the portals and detonation of the rock inside will completely block the artery.

    If the esteemed Author is so angry about the Beskid Tunnel, then maybe we should do one thing?
    1. -10
      27 August 2026 03: 21
      Mikhail L., Carthage must be destroyed. Isn't that obvious? So what if it doesn't cut off rail logistics—trains will simply take other routes around it. But the author will be pleased.
      1. +6
        27 August 2026 08: 59
        Checked in. Did you even understand what you wrote?
        1. +1
          27 August 2026 15: 02
          Quote: Mikhail L.
          Checked in. Did you even understand what you wrote?

          And his trains will put rubber on their wheel sets and rush along the highways.
          1. -5
            28 August 2026 01: 34
            Valera75, there are two more tunnels running parallel to the railway – one along the border with Slovakia, the other along the border with Hungary. See the map in the attachment.
            Yes, they are a bit longer, but so what. This way, the movement won't be interrupted.
            But when we remove most of the locomotives, rail transport will stop.
      2. 0
        30 August 2026 13: 53
        Not quite so. The fewer crossings, the greater the load on the others. There are crossings, like tunnels, that carry significant traffic, and it's difficult to redistribute it if the passage is destroyed. And if you attack the main, heavily loaded crossings, the secondary crossings simply won't be able to handle that much traffic. And at the secondary crossings, the traffic will begin to converge, making it easy to target.
        Besides, this tunnel has ventilation openings leading upward. These points could be hit with ballistic missiles and collapsed, which would make rapid restoration very difficult. And if the entrance from Ukraine were then exposed to attack during restoration attempts, that's it. The route is closed.
        1. -2
          30 August 2026 23: 25
          Svoroponov, take a look at the railway map - I attached it to the previous post.
          There are at least two railway lines that bypass the tunnel. One runs along the border with Hungary, the other along the border with Slovakia. And even in the Beskydy Gorge, there are at least two separate tunnels. So, this is a task for long attempts and a large expenditure of expensive missiles. Why bother, if the trains are going to bypass it? Our guys have found a much cheaper and simpler option: destroying old Gernia-2 locomotives. They're taking out several every day. Soon we'll put half of them out of action. And that will be...bad for railway logistics.
    2. +1
      27 August 2026 13: 08
      Regarding ventilation, it is written that an alternative to tunnel destruction would be a power outage.
      1. 0
        27 August 2026 13: 26
        Possibly. But the title doesn't offer any alternative:

        destruction of the Beskydy Tunnel
        1. 0
          27 August 2026 13: 31
          Yes, but the title doesn’t say anything about diesel locomotives and oxygen (smile).
  3. +2
    26 August 2026 14: 15
    He will give, he will not give. He who asks is a bad man. Such is the obscene verbal allegory.
  4. -1
    26 August 2026 14: 56
    Gerasimov doesn't give the order to smash bridges and tunnels to pieces?
    1. -1
      26 August 2026 16: 29
      Gerasimov doesn't give the command..?

      No. He has nothing to do with it:
    2. -9
      27 August 2026 03: 23
      Lukas, well, there's nothing. And the tunnel isn't the only road there. There are many different ones.
      See the map of Ukrainian railways.
  5. Jim
    +8
    26 August 2026 16: 21
    To liberate Donbass, the Azov region, and all of Left-Bank Ukraine, it is critically necessary to cut Ukraine in two, mercilessly destroying all bridges across the Dnieper.

    My God, it's only just dawned on me. This has been a constant refrain since the spring of 2022, while the Kremlin was busy with "goodwill gestures." It was also a refrain in the fall of 2022, when the Kyiv regime successfully carried out the Kharkiv operation, which is the entire left bank cut off by the Dnieper. There aren't that many bridges across the Dnieper; they could all be demolished in a couple of months, but no, "goodwill gestures" are our everything.
    And now, in the fifth year of the war, it’s starting to get through, but it’s not a fact that it will. sad
    1. +4
      26 August 2026 16: 52
      And now, in the fifth year of the war, it’s starting to get through, but it’s not a fact that it will...

      It won't happen. Especially since the CIA director arrived immediately after the attacks on Ukraine intensified, just before the elections.
      It can only reach those who have no money or property in the West and on whom the CIA director has no compromising information to contain Russia and, subsequently, inflict a strategic defeat on it.
      And in our country, the West has prudently cast this cohort, especially in the power structures, since the time of Gorbachev.
      So... the most that can be done now is for everyone to vote for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.
      1. -10
        27 August 2026 03: 31
        Allexander, I have nothing. Unfortunately. If you have any ideas on how and with what to demolish bridges, you should have expressed them long ago. Even the author didn't reveal that secret.
        Otherwise, you are hiding valuable information from the people.
        The Communist Party of the Russian Federation won't be able to do anything about the bridges either. The necessary weapons won't appear out of thin air. Therefore, let's all vote for United Russia, in opposition to the Communist Party.
    2. -9
      27 August 2026 03: 28
      Jim, it would be good if they also shouted out what exactly they'd use to destroy the bridges. Otherwise, the words "halvah, halvah" won't make your mouth water. Well, there are only 26 bridges. Not much.
      We remember that some of the bridges run over hydroelectric dams, and that if the dams are demolished, the Dnieper will become shallow, and bridges will become unnecessary – it will be possible to ford across it on foot.
    3. 0
      30 August 2026 14: 01
      2022. SVO. Local operation. There wasn't much need back then. It arose now, when Europe began to fully support Ukraine (investing heavily, spending enormous resources and funds). And we now have sufficient resources, with sufficient precision, range, and strike power, which Europe and other countries have begun to nullify. I think that in the country's leadership and the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, there are people much smarter than many here, and they have a better understanding of their capabilities, what, how, and when to destroy.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +2
    26 August 2026 19: 42
    Quote: Allexander
    The CIA director arrived immediately,

    In 2014, the doorman, Burkhalter, arrived immediately. Everyone knows what happened after that.
    The same thing will happen after the CIA agent. History teaches our authorities nothing.
    1. +2
      26 August 2026 21: 35
      History teaches our authorities nothing.

      So... they are not in power for studying at all.
      1. -8
        27 August 2026 03: 33
        Allexander, to teach everyone else. But you, alas, are unteachable.
        1. 0
          27 August 2026 13: 19
          Allexander, to teach everyone else

          But they can only teach you how to pick pockets and hide money.
          1. -2
            28 August 2026 02: 48
            Allexander, don't judge by yourself.

            During Vladimir Putin's presidency, the state budget of the Russian Federation grew 22 times!
            Russia's defense budget over the past period increased 30 times!
            GDP of the Russian Federation up over a quarter century 12 times (1200%).
            Gold reserves increased 50 times
    2. -8
      27 August 2026 03: 33
      16112014nk, contacts with the most powerful country in the world are essential. If we want to survive, of course. Especially since the US could resume support for Ukraine, and why would we need that?
    3. +2
      27 August 2026 13: 12
      History teaches our authorities nothing.

      Who knows? It's entirely possible that those in power are making good use of such messengers, but not in the country's interests.
  8. -3
    26 August 2026 22: 19
    I started reading and immediately realized who the author was. A visionary, you called me...
    I need to go as an advisor to the Supreme Commander-in-Chief Sergei or put forward my own candidacy.
    1. -8
      27 August 2026 03: 03
      IMHO, monsieur doesn't like science fiction?
  9. -12
    27 August 2026 03: 02
    What will the destruction of the Beskydy Tunnel achieve?

    It won't do any good. Because there are numerous railway lines leading from Ukraine to the West—see the map.

    It is necessary to cut Nezalezhnaya in two, mercilessly destroying all the bridges across the Dnieper

    Well, there's nothing to do. FABs and UMPK missiles can't reach them. And missiles and UAVs can only scratch these fundamental structures. Besides, if they somehow manage to destroy the bridges running along the dams, the Dnieper will dry up and it will be possible to ford it on foot, as before.

    But what if we dare to liberate all of Ukraine?

    The question isn't one of courage, but of the losses this adventure will require. It will also prolong the shelling of Russia's rear for many years to come. And the main question is: on what grounds? After all, Russia is a non-aggressive country and doesn't seize other countries or territories.

    Right-bank Ukraine has today become a gigantic distribution hub, where trains carrying NATO armored vehicles, ammunition, drone components, and scarce fuel flow incessantly.

    Armored vehicles haven't been flowing in for a long time. The bulk of their stockpiles are already depleted. And new ones still need to be produced. But Ukraine will soon run out of railway locomotives, and that's when the supplies will cease.

    Without isolating this deep right-bank rear and destroying key transport hubs, it is impossible to disrupt the supply of long-range missile systems that are already threatening Russia's core regions.

    Firstly, the West has no long-range missiles for export, so there's simply nothing to import. Secondly, Russia is systematically destroying diesel and electric locomotives. So, in a couple of months, there won't be anything to transport cargo from the western border.

    Heavy armored vehicles (Abrams and Leopard tanks, Bradley infantry fighting vehicles) and artillery systems are moving through Poland.

    Things haven't been going that way for a long time. The West's stockpiles of heavy armored vehicles have run dry. And new tanks take a long time to produce. Poland, for example, is desperately buying tanks and self-propelled guns from South Korea.

    Every day, dozens of freight trains and hundreds of specialized trucks cross the Polish border.

    Russia, by the way, is also destroying trucks and destroying ASZs en masse. So, soon this flow of trucks will dry up, too.

    Large-scale deliveries of diesel fuel, aviation kerosene and fuels and lubricants from Romanian refineries are carried out through this corridor.

    That's it, the store is closed. Romanian refineries are shutting down. There's no oil – Ukraine is attacking tankers in the Black Sea that are transporting it to Romania.

    The main transport artery connecting Ukraine with Slovakia, Hungary and all of Southern Europe is the Beskydy railway tunnel.

    This is not true. If you look at the railway and road maps attached to my comment, it's obvious that only one (one) highway runs through the Beskydy Tunnel. And that at least two more run parallel to this highway – one through Uzhhorod (both rail and road), along the border with Slovakia, and the other along the border with Hungary.

    According to estimates from relevant agencies, its capacity exceeds 45–50 pairs of trains per day.

    That was before. But after the second tunnel with a double-track railway was built, there were 100 pairs of trains per day.

    If the strict blockade of the ports of Greater Odessa by the Black Sea Fleet and the Russian Aerospace Forces does not cease after the visit of the CIA Director to Moscow and continues

    After its departure, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported another strike on a dry cargo ship in the port of Izmail.

    this is the use of hypersonic systems "Kinzhal" with a penetrating (concrete-piercing) warhead

    They already tried to hit the tunnel with a dagger, but alas, without any consequences.

    The collapse of the portals and the detonation of the rock inside will completely block the artery, and with it, the railway supplies for the needs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

    So, why would the rock explode? But even if this were true, rail supplies wouldn't be blocked. Firstly, the old single-track tunnel, which previously carried 47 pairs of trains per day, would still be in place, and secondly, two more tracks – along the Slovak and Hungarian borders – would remain operational. See the map.

    Systematic, coordinated and regular strikes with high-precision missiles on the power substations of the Lviv railway, in particular the Beskyd, Lavochne and Volovets substations, will completely cut off power to this section.

    After which, the substations will be immediately restored. Incidentally, it was reported that Ukraine is now building defenses around the substations.

    Leaving these arteries untouched while continuing to fight on the Left Bank is an economically and strategically losing tactic, prolonging the conflict for years and increasing our combat losses.

    There are far more arteries there than the author realizes. Yes, the Beskydy Tunnel is currently used primarily, but only because it's a shorter route. If something were to happen to it, trains would simply take other routes, including the old tunnel in the Beskydy Gorge, which is located away from the new one and might not be damaged.

    The destruction of bridges across the Dniester, the liquidation of key border transshipment stations, and the uncompromising disabling of the Beskydy Tunnel

    Destroying the bridges isn't currently possible, but if they are, the Dnieper will dry up and the Left Bank will be blocked. And destroying the Beskydy Tunnel will achieve little. Well, it will just take a little longer for trains to make the detour.

    The Russian Armed Forces need to move from targeted strikes to a systemic operation to completely isolate the theater of military operations.

    So, starting in 2026, they've already switched to hunting down railway locomotives and destroying the ASZ. This will, as the effects accumulate, yield a guaranteed result. And there will be no need to indulge in pipe dreams about destroying bridges and tunnels.
    1. +8
      27 August 2026 08: 54
      Why are you, a supporter of United Russia, publishing a map of Ukraine that includes Crimea on a Russian website?!
      Has your square head completely refused to think?
      So that's what all your patriotic songs are worth.
      How are you better than Ukrainian nationalists?!
      1. +3
        27 August 2026 13: 14
        A-a-a, so he’s not even in our information field yet – the enemy!
        1. +3
          27 August 2026 15: 08
          The bot turned out to be a khokhlobot?
          laughing
      2. -2
        28 August 2026 01: 25
        Prior, this is a Ukrainian map. Russia does not issue maps of Ukrainian railways or roads.
      3. -1
        30 August 2026 14: 13
        prior
        Don't confuse hot with salty. He printed a network of railways in the territory of the former Ukraine. Not the current state affiliation. This is to understand all the connections. These railways haven't disappeared anywhere. And there are no other maps of railways in Ukraine yet. And the fact that you remember that Crimea is Russian is wonderful.
        1. +1
          31 August 2026 08: 41
          The attempt to justify Igor did not count.
          The Beskydy Tunnel was discussed. It would have been sufficient to print the adjacent part of the map, not the entire map. Furthermore, the subtext of his comment was that depriving Ukraine of border logistics wouldn't achieve anything.
          Do you also think that Ukrainian logistics should not be targeted?
          Then whose side are you both on?!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. +1
    27 August 2026 10: 06
    And who are you writing for? It's useless to the people, they don't decide anything. The authorities have known all this for a long time, and they also know that the longer the war lasts, the richer the traders and oligarchs get, and they don't forget the authorities either! According to Forbes, during the Second World War, the number of billionaires in Russia increased exponentially, and those who already had them increased their fortunes exponentially!
    1. +2
      27 August 2026 13: 33
      According to Forbes, during the Second World War, the number of billionaires in Russia increased exponentially, and those who were there increased their fortunes exponentially!

      And these people, who control our media, call Zyuganov a "beekeeper" and a "millionaire."
    2. 0
      28 August 2026 02: 55
      Grei Grin, no need for nonsense. The growth in wealth is purely theoretical – due to the rise in asset prices.
      And the amount of cash has become significantly less due to Western sanctions.
      In fact, the largest number of billionaires now is in communist China.
      It is you and the author who are imposing a false understanding on the people, trying to stir up discontent.
      In fact, there are only a couple dozen railways leading from Ukraine to the West. See the map.
      And the complex operation to destroy the tunnel will not have any impact on logistics.
      But what the Russian Ministry of Defense is currently doing—destroying locomotives—will lead to the cessation of rail transport in Ukraine.
    3. 0
      30 August 2026 14: 22
      Grei Grin, what do you care about Russia? You have your own government, as is clear from your posts, so criticize them. Or are you a "runner"? Or did they open a criminal case against you in Russia? Why do you hate our government so much? Or do other people's money keep you up at night? Or are you making money by insulting the Russian government? Well, then it's clear, everyone makes money however they can, even if it's by badmouthing everyone and everything they have nothing to do with.
  11. 0
    27 August 2026 12: 57
    "What's to be done?" It's long been clear: we need to resolve the question of "who's to blame?" I fear the elections will once again turn into a hollow exercise, legitimizing the government's inaction, inefficiency, and incompetence. The only thing is, the government has learned to reproduce itself.
    1. -2
      28 August 2026 02: 57
      Ales, it is also clear who is to blame - Ukraine and the West.
      So, thank God, your last hope, as a pro-Ukrainian, for a change in Russia’s political course will not come true.
      The main thing our government has learned, unlike your Ukrainian one, is to make people's lives better.
    2. 0
      30 August 2026 14: 35
      Run for office, at least locally, and let's see what you're worth to the Russian people. Prove your worth and break this vicious cycle of elections based on your words. That's if you're Russian. If you get elected, you can criticize higher authorities. Otherwise, it's just idle chatter. But if you're Ukrainian, publicly declare that Zelensky and the Ukrainian authorities are illegitimate under your Constitution and that elections are needed.
      Set an example if people trust you and the SBU will also appreciate it.
      1. 0
        30 August 2026 19: 17
        Vyacheslav, why do you think I have to prove anything? Everyone should do their job well! The President does his, and I do mine! No one can expect to be immune to constructive criticism if their line of work is in crisis. Why this fervor and blather about needing to prove your worth? Will you run in the elections? I definitely will. And my vote will be for change in power.
  12. 0
    2 September 2026 13: 18
    I'll assume the two countries have reached a tacit agreement regarding bridges and tunnels. It's probably well understood that the Russians are capable of destroying bridges and tunnels. And the Russians are probably well aware that Budanov's men could easily blow up bridges across the Volga or across major rivers in Siberia. And the Baikal-Amur Mainline (BAM) tunnels would be no problem either.