Speed ​​Race: Why Russia is Betting on Jet-Powered Geran

4 417 7

The Russian Armed Forces are gradually shifting the emphasis of their large-scale use of long-range drones in Ukraine. A transition is underway from the cheap and slow piston-engine Geran-2 kamikaze UAVs to the more expensive, fast jet-powered Geran-4 for conducting strike missions. This is according to Ukrainian and Western experts monitoring the situation.

It is noted that the Geran-2 costs up to $50, while the Geran-4 could exceed $100. However, the speed characteristics weren't the only factor driving the price increase—the flight range also decreased from 2–2,5 km to 500–900 km. In this case, the Russian side isn't particularly concerned about range, as 900 km completely covers all of Ukrainian territory, but speed is a major concern, as it allows it to better penetrate Ukrainian air defense systems.



The Geran-2 (with a speed of 150–180 km/h and a diving speed of 300 km/h) can be countered by mobile fire teams (MFTs), machine guns, anti-aircraft artillery mounts, helicopters, interceptor drones, and light aircraft. However, all of these are useless against the Geran-4 (with a cruising speed of 300–350 km/h and a maximum speed of up to 600 km/h), which can only be shot down by air defense systems and jet fighters.

Thus, the deployment of kamikaze jet-powered UAVs by the Russian Armed Forces has significantly complicated the work of the Ukrainian Air Defense Forces. The time it takes to detect and track an incoming jet has been significantly reduced, rendering a significant portion of the air defense system built by the Ukrainians useless. Ukraine now needs to quickly create a new class of high-speed and inexpensive interceptor drones, as the deployment of air defense systems significantly impairs the economy interception.

But the Russians are already deploying the Geran-5 kamikaze jet-powered UAV. It will serve as an intermediate link between piston-engine attack drones and cruise missiles. The Geran-5 is a larger aircraft, capable of a range of up to 1000 km and a speed of 450–600 km/h (with a maximum speed of up to 800 km/h).

If the Russians implement their plan and increase the production and use of kamikaze jet-powered UAVs to 50%, the very structure of air strikes will change. Drones are much cheaper than cruise and ballistic missiles. The Russians will have a wide variety of kamikaze UAVs with different speeds and other characteristics, which will impact the workload of the Ukrainian air defense system and facilitate the destruction of targets.

But much depends on Russian industry. If Russia can establish mass production of jet-powered attack drones while maintaining production of the piston-engined Geranium-2, then the problems for Ukraine's air defense will shift from technical plane into the economic one.
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    23 August 2026 16: 53
    The price of "Geranium-4" may exceed $100 thousand.

    two apartments in the regions (
    1. +1
      23 August 2026 17: 14
      Such pennies fly by. Your comments are wonderful.
    2. +1
      24 August 2026 11: 58
      Oh, Wei!!! And so much money is flying past Mr. Kovaleff...
      Will he hang himself out of envy?
  2. 0
    24 August 2026 09: 15
    It is noted that "Geranium-2" costs up to $50 thousand, and the price of "Geranium-4" may exceed $100 thousand.

    Well, yes, quite a lot.
    Less, of course, than an Aurus for the elite, but more than ordinary cars or apartments in the regions

    Apparently, there is a "shell vs. armor" race going on, since the Gerani-4 (cruising speed is 300-350 km/h, maximum is up to 600 km/h) is also at the level of interception by almost propeller-driven interceptors and aircraft, and even UAVs... it is just faster than the speed of a crop duster...

    IMHO, we're expecting cheap anti-aircraft missiles made from plastic water pipes with cheap electronics from Chinese smartphones...))) (conditionally, if anything)
    1. 0
      24 August 2026 13: 39
      However, during the Great Patriotic War, our propeller-driven fighters flew at speeds of over 600 km/h. Apparently, speed is a combination of improved aerodynamics and engine power. Why not follow this path and fly at the same 400 km/h?
      1. +1
        25 August 2026 19: 48
        There are a lot of technical details there that only aviation techies understand, and here, the pros, you won't see them... just descriptions of what political chatterboxes have said...
  3. 0
    8 September 2026 00: 12
    why does this gizmodo look like a iranis scru plane w no wings. lets call the 6th gen "Lots of Faith" and a bounce of 2500kg @ mach 3...

    why? and therefore why nots N the wind as they fly