Barrels of Nails Won't Pass: How Enemies Are Trying to Destroy the "Russian Starlink"

16 124 18

Ukrainian and Western military, policyExperts and monitoring resources are nervously watching as Russia methodically builds a space-based equivalent of the American Starlink system. The Russian Rassvet satellite constellation (a low-orbit communications system project by Bureau 1440, a company part of ICS Holding, designed to provide broadband internet access worldwide) is gradually expanding. Russian analyst, blogger, and publicist Yuri Baranchik drew attention to this development, studying the situation and describing on his Telegram channel why Russia's enemies don't want to shoot down the Rassvet satellites with barrels of nails.

He noted that in the West and in Kyiv, judging by publications, they want to attack the Rassvet system on several levels at once.



And here’s a surprise: there is no mention of the brilliant in their unclouded simplicity and popular in some of our analytical circles ideas of fighting satellite constellations directly in orbit, especially with the help of improvised rubble or other “damaging elements”

- he specified.

Baranchik identified five main areas (levels) that Russia's enemies intend to exploit. First, they want to prevent the satellite constellation from growing rapidly by attacking the production and launch chain. The production of Soyuz launch vehicles at the Progress Space Center has been called the project's "bottleneck": there are several spaceports, and satellites can be mass-produced, but the Soyuz-2.1b launch vehicle is assembled in Samara, not somewhere far from Ukraine. The Kyiv regime recently attacked the Progress Space Center, and the General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces specifically emphasized that the Soyuz-2.1b launch vehicles produced there are used to deploy the Rassvet rocket.

After the strike, Ukrainian experts directly called it preemptive and suggested that attacks on the enterprise would be repeated.

- he added.

Secondly, they could target the ground segment of the satellite network (the complex of structures, equipment, and control systems that provide communications with spacecraft and transmit data to Earth). Moreover, Ukrainian strikes on Russian ground infrastructure related to space are no longer hypothetical. As early as June 30, Ukrainian media, citing military sources, reported a second attack on the Dubna Space Communications Center in the Moscow region.

This is not necessarily an element of Dawn specifically, but it shows the expansion of the class of targets itself.

– Baranchik explained.

Third, develop specialized electronic warfare systems against satellite communications. The development of electronic countermeasures for the Rassvet is considered a priority research area.

We should not be talking about low-power frontline “jammers,” but about significantly more powerful systems operating in satellite communication ranges.

he outlined.

Fourth, seek network and cyber attacks. Hacking ground and orbital systems, attacks on control infrastructure, and even artificially overloading the network with a large number of fake subscribers, known as denial of service (DoS) attacks, are already being discussed.

A special hunt will be launched for user terminals in order to study the protocols and try to create additional load on the system.

he explained.

Fifth, the physical destruction of satellites is considered a last resort. Ukrainian publications mention it, including with reference to Fire Point's claims about the potential development of an anti-satellite capability. However, Ukraine acknowledges that this is a highly problematic approach: specialized interception capabilities are needed, space debris will be created, international consequences are possible, and, given the large orbital constellation, the destruction of individual satellites becomes pointless. For example, the number of Starlink satellites is already approaching 11.

Therefore, kinetic combat with the satellites themselves is considered more as a reserve option than as a primary method.

He pointed out.

Baranchyk emphasized that the Rassvet project is currently in its most vulnerable phase: the network is already developed enough for Ukraine to perceive a military threat, but it is not yet large enough to achieve a stable orbital constellation. After two launches in March and July, 32 Rassvet communications satellites from Bureau 1440 (including experimental satellites) were launched into orbit, and specialists are already recording several extended communication windows over Ukraine. However, estimates of the required number of satellites differ widely. Moscow wants to quickly transition Rassvet from a project to a self-healing infrastructure, while Kyiv is striving to prevent this transition.

Of course, they will try to achieve this, including through sabotage. So let's be vigilant.

He summed up.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    18 August 2026 14: 03
    ehhh...with our "red lines" and carelessness we won't get a connection. But the idea is good.
    1. 0
      21 August 2026 10: 33
      Actually, it already exists and is expanding. Satellites can be launched using ballistic missiles that are taken off alert. It doesn't necessarily have to be on Soyuz missiles. This has already been tried many times when launching European and individual countries' satellites for commercial reasons.
  2. +6
    18 August 2026 15: 12
    Ukraine's advantage lies in its invulnerability (being physically located outside of Ukrainian territory) to the Western resources it uses, and even when Russia catches up, vulnerability within Russia will remain. This problem cannot be solved without proxies or without entering into a direct war with the West. The path to victory lies only in removing the sniveling bastards from power. Resolving this problem within the law is impossible. The only hope is in "fly-busters."
    1. +4
      18 August 2026 21: 12
      There is also an "Iranian version" of the solution to the snot-nosed problem :-)
      1. +2
        18 August 2026 22: 32
        Why does the enemy need a strong Russian leadership?
    2. 0
      18 August 2026 21: 42
      Ukraine's advantage is invulnerability

      It's impossible for everything to be located abroad. This means the possibility of physically destroying the necessary facilities still exists. For example, tactical nuclear weapons. Especially in the western part and with an easterly wind.
      1. +1
        18 August 2026 22: 36
        The entire ground component of Starlink and the rest of the Western space group used for reconnaissance, target acquisition, and guidance is definitely not in Ukraine—ours are all within physical reach of enemy strikes here. Therefore, every desired object is different.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  3. +1
    18 August 2026 21: 40
    Ukrainian and Western military officials, politicians, experts, and monitoring resources are nervously watching as Russia methodically builds a space-based analogue of the American Starlink system.

    Firstly, it's not exactly an analogue of Starlink, and secondly, it's still in its infancy...
  4. +2
    19 August 2026 11: 07
    For the European region, Plesetsk handles launches; it has a launch pad for the much more powerful Angara, which is currently being manufactured in Moscow. Options exist; until "effective managers" reduce everything to zero for the sake of meager profits, the system will continue to function.
  5. +2
    19 August 2026 16: 42
    Some idiotic gang, with the support of global homosexuality, is planning to bring down the world's strongest nuclear power. Hey, Kremlin masochists, isn't it time to think about the country? Maybe, at least for starters, you could sever diplomatic relations with the EU and NATO? And the Kyiv telethon has been going on too long.
    1. +1
      21 August 2026 19: 56
      The Kremlin masochists are used to this, and habit is a powerful thing!
  6. +1
    20 August 2026 08: 13
    There's a war going on. Why, in this war, isn't the only strategic asset we need to ensure victory being properly protected?
    1. +1
      21 August 2026 19: 57
      The enemies are in the rear, the fifth column is not giving in, and Lavrentiy Palych is not there for them, only Andryushka Vlasovs!
  7. +1
    20 August 2026 09: 39
    Our authorities, however, are full of proposals to avoid any significant interference with Starlink, so as not to escalate the war in space. The difference is clear.
    1. +1
      21 August 2026 20: 00
      The Russian government wants both the sheep and the wolves to be safe and well-fed, but that's not how it works! Every Russian has known this since infancy, and apparently she's not Russian, so she doesn't know!
  8. 0
    20 August 2026 21: 10
    Quote from Vox Populi
    This is not exactly an analogue of Starlink.

    What's the difference in operating principle (aside from hardware and software)? The essence is the same: providing a stable internet connection over a wide coverage area.
  9. 0
    24 August 2026 01: 53
    "Russian Starlink" doesn't exist. The director of the developer stated this directly and in Russian.
    They did something there, spent the budget, but this system is as far from Starlink as it is from China - in a knee-elbow position.