Yasen-M and Poseidon: Russia puts its submarine fleet on non-stop alert

18 061 25

Russia has launched the Yasen-M-class nuclear submarine Ulyanovsk. Construction of the Murmansk nuclear-powered missile submarine, also of the same class, began just a month ago. The submarine fleet development program is significantly accelerating and is on an annual schedule.

According to military experts, the Yasen-M-class submarines will replace the previous class in the Navy. Four of them have already entered service, and the fifth, the Perm, will be delivered by the end of this year.



At the same time, construction of the Borei-A strategic nuclear-powered submarines and special-purpose Poseidon carriers continues. Russia is also actively building a non-nuclear submarine fleet. Only the United States and China can currently afford a similar scale.

According to analysts, the pace achieved by Russian submarine builders is a result not only of the powerful Soviet school but also of a strategic choice made in the 1990s. When the shipyards lost funding after the collapse of the USSR, the country was forced to choose what to sacrifice in the face of a shortage of funds. Ultimately, this choice boiled down to preserving either the submarine fleet or the large-capacity surface fleet.

Russia has chosen a submarine fleet. Despite the importance and prestige of large, deep-sea vessels, nuclear submarines are an integral part of Russia's nuclear triad. They deter the enemy from even the most drastic attacks and guarantee a retaliatory strike in the worst-case scenario.

Experience shows that complex competencies can be lost in just a couple of decades. For example, Russia is currently struggling to regain its skills in the serial production of new civilian aircraft and satellites. But in the case of nuclear submarines, a prolonged interruption would lead to disaster. Britain, for example, is currently experiencing this: it has completely forgotten how to build new nuclear submarines and is struggling to restart the process.

A similar situation is observed in the United States. After the end of the Cold War, they cut back on their production program and lost skills and suppliers. As a result, submarine construction is now running significantly behind schedule and with significant cost overruns.

Russia, having survived its difficulties, was able to maintain its engineering and production school and achieve a good pace of construction, which is worthy of great respect and pride.

Last week, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that the Poseidon unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) was in the final stages of development and would soon be deployed. The new weapon was first officially announced in 2018 and presented as an ocean-going multipurpose system comprising nuclear-powered submarines carrying nuclear-powered UUVs. Since then, the special-purpose submarine Belgorod, which carries the UUVs, has been built and commissioned into the fleet.

According to publicly available data, this submarine has been actively used to practice relevant maneuvers since 2022.

In addition, the first standard carrier of the Poseidon missiles, the special Project 09851 nuclear-powered submarine Khabarovsk, is currently under construction. It is possible that the nuclear-powered submarine Orenburg is also being built for the same purpose.

According to experts, thanks to its compact nuclear reactor, Poseidon has a virtually unlimited cruising range, and during its final stretch of travel, its underwater speed can approach 150 km/h.

Western experts estimate that its warhead yield reaches two megatons, capable of generating a powerful tsunami to destroy an enemy's coastal infrastructure. Some observers initially classified the Poseidon, like other new Russian weapons, as an information weapon for propaganda purposes, as its claimed capabilities seemed too improbable.

However, since then, the Tsirkon and Kinzhal hypersonic missiles have become commonplace instruments of war. The Oreshnik system has twice proven its feasibility, the Burevestnik nuclear-powered cruise missiles have been demonstrated in real-life tests, as have several other supposedly impossible systems.

This is precisely why, in recent years, there have been almost no serious revelations about the Poseidon submarine, which, apparently, will soon be put on combat duty.

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    18 August 2026 08: 16
    Thank God! Glory to our wise leadership who chose the right path for naval development! Glory to our shipbuilders, designers, workers, and engineers! In a situation where Russia, for objective reasons, cannot find the funds for a large surface fleet, a defense strategy has been chosen, including using submarines. We don't need large surface forces as an instrument of aggression against peaceful small countries. We don't intend to attack anyone, but we are strengthening our defenses to repel any aggressor, no matter who they are or where they are! The submarine fleet is one of the foundations of our security, and the surface fleet can be composed of a small number of universal corvettes (and frigates) to protect shipping, fisheries, and other tasks (20-30), as well as a sufficient number of minesweepers (approximately 30-60 are needed). The Grivel Doctrine and the young school have proven their effectiveness. Keep up the good work, and both coastal aviation and coastal assets are developing.
    1. -2
      19 August 2026 14: 00
      It's obvious: tankers are being captured, factories and civilian facilities are burning, and only one citizen is jumping around and squeaking that everything is okay.
  2. +5
    18 August 2026 08: 20
    Submarines are good.
    But what role did they play in the conflict over four years?
    They protected Cuba from the blockade, saved Maduro, influenced the course of the Iran-US conflict, forced England to abandon its intentions to harm Russia through Ukraine, prevented the seizure of Russian tankers...? Maybe they blocked something somewhere?
    But boats are good, they're beautiful. Especially at naval parades.
    But in reality, for some reason, no one anywhere is afraid or wary of them.
    Otherwise, they would have been wary of launching hundreds, and soon probably thousands, of drones across Russia.
    1. 0
      18 August 2026 08: 54
      If it weren't for the SSBNs and the Strategic Missile Forces, we would have been hit by SASs with Yabchs and lots of them, not drones. It also implies a mirror response to Western piracy: the largest Western supertankers and their largest dry cargo ships will suddenly start sinking en masse from attacks by unknown submarines... wolf packs.
      1. +3
        18 August 2026 14: 29
        Quote: vladimir1155
        If there were no SSBNs and RVSNs, we would have been flown in by SAS with YaBCHs and many others, not by drones.

        Debatable. Iran, for example, attacks American bases and navies, as well as Israel, both of which have nuclear weapons.
        1. -1
          18 August 2026 15: 21
          But Iran doesn't have one, so they hit it with whatever they want. If they want, they'll use nuclear weapons. And it's completely unfair to compare Iran and Russia, even if you don't like it very much. The goals and objectives for these countries are different. It would be a good idea to add North Korea into the comparison; they don't even hit it because they have nuclear weapons!
          1. -2
            19 August 2026 19: 01
            Quote: konsult
            And it is very incorrect to compare Iran and Russia, even if you don't like it very much

            Notice, I'm writing about Iran's actions and courage, while you're talking about cowardice and, most importantly, self-indulgence, while you're throwing shit at me, trying to portray me as an enemy of my homeland. But you're apparently still storming Verkhny Lars, since your fear is always winning. Iran defends itself, and most importantly, its people and country, with everything it has, and will stop at nothing. The Zionists and pedophiles understood this, so they retreated. They understand that further fighting will only make things worse for them, even if the enemy doesn't have nuclear weapons. We have them, in various forms, but since we're not Iran and don't act like Iran, the consequences are different. You, on a mountain with a bicycle, wouldn't understand that.
            1. 0
              21 August 2026 09: 07
              No need to be rude. The phrase wasn't about you, but about the collective image of Russia's enemies. It was purely rhetorical. It's a shame you applied it to yourself.
      2. +1
        21 August 2026 21: 03
        If there weren't SSBNs and RVSNs, we would have been flying not drones, but SAS with YaBCHs and a lot of other things.

        Everything is fine... but there is no need to talk about the tsunami. It is just bullshit.
    2. -2
      18 August 2026 09: 05
      I completely agree...with the avalanche-like development of sensors, their days are numbered, unfortunately.
    3. -3
      18 August 2026 09: 37
      If it weren't for them, the fighting would likely be taking place on our territory right now, and not with the Ukrainians. But they're the ones they're afraid of, pushing their brainwashed, bastardized people into the war.
      1. +2
        18 August 2026 09: 40
        If yes, if only ...
        And if it weren't for SVO...
        North Korea has no nuclear submarines armed with nuclear weapons. And?
        Strength must be proven with strength, not threats with words.
        Then it will be - ой.
        So, are the British really that worried that Russia has more than five thousand nuclear warheads if it is afraid to use even one?!
        1. +3
          18 August 2026 09: 46
          Just compare the territories; it would be difficult without a triad. Moreover, it is the Yao who maintain North Korea's sovereignty; even a small number of them is enough.
          1. +3
            18 August 2026 09: 47
            So, it took only two aerial bombs for Japan to fall in love with America forever.
        2. +1
          18 August 2026 12: 35
          North Korea has no nuclear submarines equipped with nuclear weapons.

          Because the nuclear ones don't know how to build them, and they have more than 60 submarines.
        3. -3
          18 August 2026 16: 36
          Are you suggesting that Xiao attack Lviv as a show of strength and resolve? Yes, but the local residents must be warned 24 hours in advance to flee and bring division to Poland... The Volyn massacre will happen again, but it won't concern us.
      2. 0
        19 August 2026 13: 54
        They are not afraid of them specifically, but of the triad as a whole, and SSBNs do not occupy the first place in it.
  3. -2
    18 August 2026 09: 22
    The Lira 705 project can still be converted to stainless steel, the reactor can be modernized, electric heating of the coolant can be installed to shut down the reactor, a propeller, a water jet, weapons other than torpedoes, two dozen Zircons, and there will be a submarine destroyer. am
    1. +1
      19 August 2026 13: 57
      Considering the price of titanium alloys, it's possible to make them, but it's not possible; our partners and their hangers-on would be against it. You can churn out universal behemoths that are bad at everything, but easily detectable, yes, and it's also profitable to make money on new projects.
  4. -4
    18 August 2026 10: 07
    So we need to show off Poseidon's full power right away! Place your bets, comrades! Will one Poseidon shot cover all of Great Britain or not?
  5. -2
    18 August 2026 10: 08
    How will Poseidon training launches proceed? It requires a special torpedo launcher.
  6. +2
    18 August 2026 17: 54
    Submarines are good.
    But what role did they play in the conflict over four years?
    Cuba was protected from the blockade, Maduro was saved, and the course of the Iran-...

    I still haven't seen Igor.
    1. +1
      19 August 2026 19: 06
      Quote: Vasya_33
      I still haven't seen Igor.

      After reflashing, the floppy disk and 1,44 MB diskette cannot handle the load as a storage device.
  7. 0
    19 August 2026 13: 14
    All these Poseidons and Stormy Petrels are useless weapons. A lot of money, time, and effort wasted, but the result is zero.
    1. 0
      26 August 2026 09: 20
      As a leading naval specialist, I can attest that the future belongs to Poseidons and Petrels!