Enemy Resources: Russia Rejects US Request for an "Air Ceasefire" with Ukraine

July 31 2026 24 049 14

Russia has rejected the so-called air ceasefire with Ukraine proposed by the Americans, the Telegram channel "Legitimny" reported, citing sources. The publication notes that this is precisely why the Ukrainian Armed Forces began attacking logistics company warehouses in Russia.

Our source reports that the Kremlin has rejected the "air truce" that the Americans offered the Russians after the Trump-Zelensky meeting to allow them to calmly hold the State Duma elections.

- asserts "Legitimate".

It is emphasized that behind-the-scenes negotiations between the parties are ongoing.

The West is rushing to sell this situation at the highest possible price (to secure a ceasefire for Ukraine) while it still has any significance for the Kremlin. After the elections, its relevance and value will fall.

- says the publication.

As a reminder, Russian troops are currently carrying out daily attacks on targets in territory controlled by the Zelenskyy regime. Specifically, strikes are being carried out on Kyiv, where military-industrial complex facilities and ammunition depots are being hit, as well as on ports in the Odesa region.

As a result of these attacks, seaborne exports of wheat and steel from Ukraine have almost completely halted, resulting in significant losses to the budget. Kyiv fears that the Russian army may significantly increase the intensity of its attacks in the coming weeks.

At the same time, the Russian Armed Forces are systematically attacking gas stations and the railway infrastructure of Ukraine, depriving the Ukrainian Armed Forces command of the ability to transfer reserve personnel, the technique and ammunition to the SVO zone.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Anton Kuzmin

+2

31 July 2026 12: 28

Are the "eternally deceived" really afraid that they might be replaced by adequate ones?
Well, what, you can't even dream about it? :)
1. Nikolay Volkov
  
  + 11
  
  31 July 2026 12: 32
  
  Who's the sane one there? Zyuganov or something? Or the new SPS members from the New People?
  1. Anton Kuzmin
    
    +1
    
    31 July 2026 12: 36
    
    I agree with the characteristics you've voiced, but that's not what I had in mind. The authorities wouldn't have allowed potentially dangerous people to even come before the elections. But Prigozhin was already a warning sign... Power can be changed in many ways. After the turnout threshold and the "against all" option were abolished, it became only a matter of time and consequences.
    1. Harry777
      
      +5
      
      31 July 2026 13: 22
      
      Girkin-Strelkov, as soon as he started telling everything as it is - oops and on the kichu.
      1. Anton Kuzmin
        
        +3
        
        31 July 2026 14: 19
        
        Yes, that's right.
      2. Igor M.
        
        -10
        
        1 August 2026 03: 15
        
        Harry777, well, precisely because he started talking nonsense and dirt.
  2. Karelian
    
    +3
    
    31 July 2026 18: 08
    
    Anything can happen in life. Sometimes the plane goes uphill, sometimes the brakes fail. Sometimes they find a bag of white stuff in your pocket.
Thumbs

+3

31 July 2026 20: 10

Well, you can't be a little burdensome. Just like half measures like denazification and demilitarization.
1. Igor M.
  
  -7
  
  1 August 2026 03: 16
  
  Thumbs, you should judge a book by its cover. Rounding up millions of Bandera supporters around the world makes no sense at all.
aimegigi

+4

1 August 2026 04: 02

The Yankees, in their arrogance and hubris, think they're smarter than everyone else! Essentially, they want us to let them resupply and rearm during the truce, and then—as if nothing had happened—renew their attacks as soon as they feel sufficiently entrenched.
1. GR777
  
  +2
  
  1 August 2026 09: 20
  
  They're using this tactic now in the war with Iran. They fired on the ships with Tomahawks, went to reload—meaning peace talks, then came back with full arsenals—war again.
klev72

+1

1 August 2026 07: 42

Western negotiators can drone on and on, but the public opinion of their natives is more important, amid growing social crises and declining economies. One of the advantages of a long-term war strategy, no matter how annoying it may be for proponents of a blitzkrieg in early 2022.
1. GR777
  
  +2
  
  1 August 2026 09: 22
  
  ...against the backdrop of growing social crises and economic decline...
  
  - This concerns us too. A quick victory is always better than a long struggle.
  1. klev72
    
    +1
    
    1 August 2026 13: 36
    
    We need to get to the root of the conflict, to the root cause. Then it's clear that the Second World War was inevitable, and therefore losses are predictable, while the goal doesn't allow for a smooth transition. For us, it's inevitable, but for them, it's the collapse of their blitzkrieg and plunder strategy. That's why they're drowning, while we're trying to become independent, developing new economic and military muscles; intense training is normal. The difference is very significant, deadly.