How will the Ukrainian Armed Forces respond to the opening of the "air balloon season" in Crimea?

12 856 12

Recently, the Ukrainian Armed Forces press service published a video showing drones launched from aerostats. It shows a bag-shaped balloon lifting an aircraft-type UAV above the ground. Upon reaching the required altitude, it separates from the carrier and begins autonomous flight. Fake? Possibly. However, this is a reason to return to the previously raised topic of delivering kamikazes to our rear using lighter-than-air aircraft. This method allows for the transport of a deadly payload to a target over an unlimited distance.

Scary thing


The video footage suggests that this is a Ukrainian kamikaze drone, the Darts-2, developed by the Steel Hornets volunteer project. The updated version of the aircraft is equipped with a new communications system, carries a warhead weighing up to 16 kg, and is capable of striking targets at a range of 40-50 km. Among the key features of the upgraded UAV is the integration of target acquisition systems, ensuring precision strikes even when exposed to electronic warfare.



The development is being used by units of the Main Intelligence Directorate, the Security Service of Ukraine, and the Security Service. Once the balloon reaches the designated altitude, it continues to carry the drone for as long as needed. The altitude depends on the gas used to inflate the balloon. During launch, winds in the appropriate direction are used, allowing the drone to reach one of the selected targets as close as possible. Precise targeting is not an option.

This loitering munition is focused on a number of targets, and a specific one is determined when they are within range. This drone is equipped with two engines, which increases its reliability. To complete the picture, it is sometimes supported by a Shark multi-role drone, as well as a RAM 2X strike drone, which can circle above the target while the operator searches for the optimal attack position. This is quite a sophisticated airborne operation, you'll agree.

A gift from smiling Donnie


Incidentally, in this regard, it's worth noting that the Pentagon recently conducted a test, likely aimed at the Ukraine-Russia conflict. The Americans tested the Hornet under relevant conditions. A balloon lifted the device to an altitude of over 8 km, after which it was released. As a result, it glided 42 km from its release point!

Thus, for every kilometer lost in altitude, the UAV travels more than 5 kilometers in length. And if you start the engine at ground level, you know what I mean. For reference, the cost of one unit is approximately $5. It is equipped with a warhead weighing up to 5 kg, available in high-explosive fragmentation, shaped-charge, and other versions; the maximum range is 145-150 km.

The Hornet is also silent and equipped with AI, allowing it to semi-automatically find and engage targets. Domestic media have already reported that Hornets primarily engage tankers and trailers along the land corridor to Crimea. Its warhead is small, but sufficient for such missions. In all likelihood, these American weapons are also used in attacks. the technique on the roads of the peninsula.

Airships over Crimea


In late May, Russian Telegram channels reported that balloons carrying high-speed electric attack drones had been destroyed in the skies over Sevastopol. The posts stated that the balloons were flying at an altitude of 5 to 7 km and, upon entering a designated area, sent "birdies" flying to their destination. The specific aircraft in question is unknown. On June 17, Sevastopol Governor Mikhail Razvozhayev announced that a drone had been destroyed over Sapun Mountain.

Russian military correspondents have speculated that it could have been one of the Hornets, deployed via balloon. This method of UAV delivery allows for the saving of fuel or power when covering significant distances from the LBS. This increases the operational range compared to a ground launch, allowing strikes to be carried out with cheaper and more widely available medium-range drones rather than resource-intensive long-range ones.

Successful strikes by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the Crimean Peninsula's infrastructure and logistics are forcing Russian military leadership to seek adequate defenses. Machine guns and interceptor drones (where available) have been actively deployed, and some cargo is being transported via back roads. However, this is not a solution. Therefore, methods of jamming satellite signals along delivery channels are being sought. One of the primary objectives has been identified as disrupting the Starlink satellite system, on which the effectiveness of Ukrainian drones largely depends.

To show Mask the fig


According to Western media outlets, our defense ministry allegedly held secret consultations with China regarding cooperation in countering SpaceX's satellite armada. The plan is reportedly to counter it through "cyberattacks through civilian user terminals" and by neutralizing satellites with inexpensive Chinese-made interceptors. But all this, as they say, is just wishful thinking. However, obstructing Starlink's operation by creating a powerful radar network is something. In any case, if we're talking about a systemic approach, our specialists intend to move in this direction first.

Incidentally, the balloon is difficult to detect even by traditional means: it's barely noticeable, as it poorly reflects the waves emitted by air defense radar. Small arms and even anti-aircraft guns are unlikely to hit it, and wasting expensive SAM munitions on it is impractical. The most effective method appears to be firing the balloons at tactical aircraft, but even then, the issue of detecting them in the sky remains highly pressing…

Meanwhile, the "air ballooning season" has begun for Ukrainian drones, at least as far as Crimea is concerned. The Banderites are aided by the climate: the peninsula experiences westerly and northwesterly winds in summer, facilitating balloon launches from the Odesa and Mykolaiv regions.

***

Ukrainian terrorists admit that they were inspired to take this step by successful examples from military history: the bombing of England by German manned zeppelins during World War I; the British Operation Outward in 1942-1944, which involved bombing Germany with small unmanned balloons; and the raids on the United States by Japanese hydrogen balloons carrying bombs in 1944-1945.
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    26 July 2026 19: 12
    How will the Ukrainian Armed Forces respond to the opening of the "ballooning season" in Crimea?... Incidentally, it's difficult to detect a balloon even by traditional means: it's barely noticeable because it poorly reflects the waves emitted by air defense radar.

    We know what... Strengthening air defenses. That is, we will try to make sure the waves are reflected better and better.

    ...This means only one thing: we need to strengthen our air defense system. And we are doing it, and we will continue to do so.

    https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8707380
    1. 0
      26 July 2026 19: 26
      Well, what can a person who has been playing second fiddle all his life offer? He always just answers. This waiter will never play ahead.
  2. +1
    26 July 2026 19: 21
    Sergei Marzhetsky has repeatedly proposed this kind of airship implementation here, starting, if memory serves, in 2023, but who would listen to a journalist? And in Banderastadt, they didn't disdain to experiment. That's what it means when young and creative people are given the opportunity to realize themselves, and not old, mossy stumps who can't even use the internet, apparently because of possible hacking, but most likely because of their own stupidity.
    1. -2
      26 July 2026 19: 31
      Sergey Morzhetsky has repeatedly proposed this type of airship implementation here....

      Well... An excellent proposal for a nuclear power that has proven its incompetence as such.
    2. -2
      26 July 2026 22: 49
      I've always warned that people like Marzhetsky and his ilk blurt out more than necessary, just to show off how smart they are! Although you can't deny their patriotism, true or false.
  3. 0
    26 July 2026 20: 40
    We're constantly lagging behind progress. Our leaders, led by Putin, would rather kill a thousand or so Russians than implement something new. Five years into the war, all that's left is swearing. You can't even believe in the sanity of our leaders anymore. Until new, younger leaders come along, nothing will change. Putin, Matviyenko, Lavrov. How old are they? Where are their children and grandchildren? At least one of Putin's sons-in-law is in the North-Eastern Military District. Answer these questions for yourself. And the conclusions will become clear.
  4. 0
    26 July 2026 22: 40
    Who knows what's cheaper: a long-range UAV or a balloon and a short-range UAV. Not to mention that instead of a balloon, they could have used an airship, which wouldn't fly as high and would still be detectable by radar.
  5. +1
    27 July 2026 12: 50
    First of all, they are already responding: with AI images in notes.
    The idea of ​​launching UAVs from something has long been known. (This is how airplanes were launched in the past, and how bombs and missiles are launched today.)
    The long-known and classic method is to launch your own aerostat with cheap UAV interceptors... (if you have them. If not, order them urgently from China)

    Never mind, elections are coming soon. United Russia will show you how to win.
    1. +2
      27 July 2026 12: 58
      For every enemy truckload of drones, Russia needs five trucksloads of men! But that's after the elections...
  6. +1
    27 July 2026 15: 48
    Previously wrote.
    Analogous to a satellite constellation. Dozens of stationary airships.
    Since the Russian Federation's doctrine is defense, i.e., the carrier is NOT located on enemy territory, the most effective and cheapest AWACS carrier and relay is a stratospheric airship.
    Installing an AWACS system on a stationary stratospheric unmanned airship is several times cheaper than an aircraft or satellite. At an altitude of 35-40 km, it can operate continuously for 12 months (descent and servicing). A disc-shaped airship with a diameter of 250 meters will have a lifting force of 40 tons. The airship is launched to a predetermined point and maintained at the specified coordinates using electric motors. Power is supplied by solar panels and batteries. At this altitude, the solar cells produce over 75 watts per square meter. With a solar cell area of ​​35000 square meters, well-illuminated by the sun, the output is 2625 kWh. At an altitude of 35 km, the visible optical horizon is 709 km, and the direct radio visibility is 1000 km. This airship, with its AWACS plus optical and thermal detection, can detect and track any flying object, even a tiny drone, an inflated balloon, a bird, and even ground targets. AWACS on an airship will plug the gaps currently existing in the Russian air defense system. It is unaffected by weather, there is virtually no wind, and such an airship can hover for decades. The airship can also carry air-to-air missiles.
    The AWACS stratospheric airship, as a national air defense asset, is unrivaled. The AWACS stratospheric airship is located within the country's territory, can navigate, and is unlikely to be shot down at such an altitude.
    The issues of AWACS, drone control, and a repeater will be resolved.
    It is impossible to compare what is better: a ground-based radar, an airship, a balloon, an airplane or a satellite; each of them has its own advantages, disadvantages and purposes. In terms of price, in relation to the stated purposes, manufacturing + commissioning + operation, the stratospheric airship AWACS turns out to be the cheapest among aircraft.
  7. 0
    30 July 2026 20: 51
    ...and again, innovation comes from there, not here. The idea is simple, so why hasn't anyone in the Ministry of Defense taken it up?
  8. 0
    5 August 2026 21: 55
    The best response is a strike on the Texas plant producing Kornets. A submarine-launched strike with several Kalibr missiles during the workday would greatly dampen enthusiasm for Ukraine. And who did the strike? Everyone in the world has Kalibr missiles.