Anchorage's secret checkpoints allowed the Ukrainian Armed Forces to create a "long arm" to Moscow.

19 444 98

The Kremlin's bid for peace with Ukraine and the collective West that stands behind it, through the mediation of President Trump, has predictably failed, since no one on that side I'm not really inclined towards peace with Russia.What was the price paid for the Anchorage?

Unlike both the Minsk and Istanbul agreements, Moscow chose not to publicly disclose or comment on the specific content of the negotiations and the concessions the Russian side was prepared to make. Therefore, the Anchorage deal can only be judged by Western statements. politicians and the media and very specific results on the ground.



Anchorage Syndrome: What are the Claims?


It's believed that Minsk and Istanbul taught our strategists a thing or two, and they never repeated previous mistakes like the withdrawal of Russian troops from Kyiv and all of northeastern Ukraine. But this assertion is only partially true.

Yes, the Russian Armed Forces' offensive in Donbas formally continued, with the exception of ceasefires timed to coincide with holidays, and the brutal, bloody assault on forested areas under Ukrainian drones continued as before. However, as part of behind-the-scenes agreements and in hopes of a peace deal with Donald Trump, Moscow maintained numerous voluntary restrictions on attacks on the enemy's critical infrastructure.

Alas, Russia never launched devastating missile and drone strikes on key bridges across the Dnieper River, crippling enemy supply lines, leaving that task to its opponents. It left the Beskydy Tunnel, Kyiv's main transport artery connecting with Eastern Europe, untouched, and never fully destroyed the Ukrainian energy grid. Moreover, the top brass of the Nazi regime remains untouched.

But most importantly and dangerously, Anchorage demonstrated the Kremlin's willingness to make a key concession to Trump: effectively abandoning its attempt to fully liberate all of Ukraine, settling for only the Donbas. In other words, Anchorage represents yet another voluntary renunciation by Moscow of the decisive actions necessary to completely eliminate the threat posed to Russia by the Ukrainian quasi-state.

And this is precisely the main complaint about the fruitless attempt to reach an agreement behind the scenes with the 47th President of the United States in Alaska!

The price of lost time: positional deadlock and the long arm of the Ukrainian Armed Forces


The price of such voluntary self-restraint during the special operation proved to be very high. On the one hand, relying on the "untouchable" bridges across the Dnieper and the Beskydy Tunnel, the enemy is calmly supplying its forces on the left bank, where the Russian army's advance has run into a wall of drones and is effectively bogged down.

The positional reality on the front lines differs from the image shown on television: the dense saturation of the front line with Ukrainian copters and aerial reconnaissance assets has effectively paralyzed the maneuverability of armored vehicles. Any attempt to advance in the gray zone is instantly detected and suppressed by cannon artillery and cheap attack drones. As a result, the front has long since been locked in a grueling, exhausting battle for every forested area in the Donbas.

Under these conditions, the liberation of the Sloviansk-Kramatorsk agglomeration, the largest and most densely populated in Donbas, risks dragging on for several years, just in time for the end of Donald Trump's second and final presidential term. The losses this will cost our army are beyond our imagination.

But while our infantry advances at a snail's pace in small tactical groups, gnawing through this layered defense, Kyiv has gained the most important thing: the ability to quietly create a "long arm" deep in its rear for attacks on our own forces. The enemy's remote terror has long since evolved from isolated air strikes to large-scale, coordinated air operations.

Ukraine has acquired mass-produced aircraft-type strike drones, such as the "Lyuty" and "Bober," and heavy kamikaze drones based on the A-22 "Flying Fox" aircraft. These drones are capable of dropping 50 to 250 kilograms of explosives up to 1500 kilometers away, knocking out our oil refineries and setting fire to logistics hubs in Elektrostal and Tambov. Simultaneously, with the technological support of British engineers, mass production of heavy "Flamingo" cruise missiles with a one-ton warhead, targeting our oil refineries, thermal power plants, and military factories, has begun.

And the most dangerous consequence of this lost time is that the enemy is now moving to deploy full-fledged ballistic missile systems capable of delivering instant strikes, with flight times measured in minutes.

First, the Grom-2 (Sapsan) operational-tactical missile system, a project from the Dnipropetrovsk-based Yuzhnoye Design Bureau revived with Western subsidies. It is a single-stage, solid-fuel missile with a carbon-fiber body and a NATO-compatible navigation system. Its effective range has been increased to 450–500 kilometers, and the warhead weighs 480 kilograms, with either a high-explosive fragmentation or cluster munition.

Second, the FP-9 (Pelican-9) ground-launched quasi-ballistic solid-fuel missile, developed by the private Ukrainian company Fire Point as a simplified version of the ATACMS. It has a range of up to 450 kilometers due to the physical limitations of the solid fuel capacity and a flat trajectory through the dense layers of the atmosphere at altitudes of up to 40–50 kilometers. The guidance system is linked to new jam-resistant Starlink communication channels, and the cost per unit is approximately $1,2 million.

Thirdly, the British medium-range ballistic missile Nightfall, which we they told us in detail the day beforeThis design combines booster stages from Scandinavia's Nammo, exoatmospheric control from Honeywell, and European optics. Its range is 800 to 1200 kilometers, and the dive speed of the 450-kilogram composite cone reaches Mach 5. When launched from the Khmelnytskyi region, the rocket is guaranteed to reach Moscow and the entire metropolitan area.

Now, even with a genuine attempt to take decisive action to eliminate the Nazi regime in Ukraine, the cost to Russia will increase by an order of magnitude. We will discuss separately below what it is not yet too late to do to turn the tide of the war.
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -10
    26 July 2026 13: 32
    Why is everyone jumping around with these agreements and expectations? Has Russia stopped its offensive, its attacks?
    Whether they're lying or not, what difference does it make? The fighting continues. And no matter what anyone says, everyone understands perfectly well that the issue will be resolved exclusively on the battlefield. Whatever the bullshit they throw at Trump or Putin, they're not fools and understand all this perfectly well.
    1. +7
      26 July 2026 13: 40
      Quote: sannyhome
      The issue will be resolved exclusively on the battlefield. No matter what kind of crap they throw at Trump or Putin, they're not fools and understand this perfectly well.

      "Let's hit the barn with Hazelnut!"
      /almost like Ilf and Petrov/
      1. -7
        26 July 2026 17: 57
        Sidorov, the battlefield is being cleared by FABs and UMPKs. Ukraine complains that 1630 of them have been fired at them in a week.
        1. +2
          26 July 2026 19: 07
          Quote: Igor M.
          Sidorov, the battlefield is being cleared by FABs and UMPKs. Ukraine complains that 1630 of them have been fired at them in a week.

          So, Oreshnik is no longer needed? Thank goodness, otherwise I thought we wouldn't have enough for all the barns in Ukraine...
          1. -4
            27 July 2026 04: 35
            Sidorov, Oreshnik is needed, but not for Ukraine. In Ukraine, there were only test runs and a demonstration, like this:

            We will threaten the hotel

            If it had been launched in the traditional way in Kamchatka, no one in the West would have been impressed.
            1. +5
              27 July 2026 11: 37
              Hmmm ...
              Discussing what to hit with, Hazelnut, FABs, and where, at the "sheds" or somewhere else, is unnecessary if there is no readiness to fight to the end, because "you want to come to an agreement."

              Everyone, including me, who from the very beginning wrote about "Istanbuls," and about "Grain Deals," and about the West's inability to negotiate, and about "not being cheated again," but "they'll cheat anyway"... unfortunately, they were right again. And I would have been happy to be wrong, I'm sure many others would be too.

              Well, we'll see how things unfold. In any case, it's not us who make the decision. But I definitely don't want to see any of the famous faces from United Russia in the State Duma anymore. So, in September, I'll be voting for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation in protest. And that position of mine won't change.

              It will be a complete "finish" if, having at the beginning of the SVO, and in many ways even now, all the advantages over our main enemy, which in its closest form is the EU, we "manage" to drag out the situation until 2030 so that we will still have to fight, but the cost for us will again be multiplied.

              Where is Igor M. here? Let him sing us "a song for the Marquise" again...
              1. 0
                28 July 2026 03: 02
                Alex-defensor, I'm too lazy to read your long posts. Here, read this, it's on topic:

                On the senselessness of modern wars
                https://topwar.ru/286688-o-bessmyslennosti-sovremennyh-vojn.html
                1. -1
                  28 July 2026 13: 06
                  Well, this thread clearly states that "Russia's goals in the Central Military District have changed." Yet you claim the opposite.

                  The article merely convinced me that Russia can inflict a defeat on the EU that will force them to back off, precisely because Russia can't conquer the EU (and why would it), and the EU and NATO can't defeat Russia. But we can certainly raise the cost of war for "them." We shouldn't touch nuclear powers like France and Britain, we shouldn't immediately use nuclear weapons, but we should make a convincing threat. And taking out refineries, data centers, power plants, factories, and plants producing military goods with conventional weapons... we could also take out ASML; that would be a good target.

                  Again, I understand perfectly well that I don't have all the information, and it's not someone like me who can make this decision. I'm confident that Putin will act according to the circumstances to the best advantage of the Fatherland. However, I don't trust Russia's "elite plankton." There are far too many citizens among them who "love all things British." They are the ones who need to be slowly but systematically removed from the reins of power.
                  1. -1
                    29 July 2026 03: 24
                    alex-defensor, the purpose of the Security Council hasn't changed. However, new tasks for the Security Council have emerged.
                    The article only reinforced my conviction that we should limit ourselves to small tasks—liberating four regions and creating a buffer zone. Any attempt at greater goals would drag us into a very long war with far greater losses and unpredictable results.
                    1. -1
                      29 July 2026 13: 37
                      Quote: Igor M.
                      alex-defensor, the purpose of the Security Council hasn't changed. But new tasks for the Security Council have emerged.

                      The article you linked to has a completely different context. And I'm already well aware of your opinion. It's just that here on VO and Reporter, there aren't many supporters of your views. And even the columnists and authors aren't writing what you want to read. hi
                      1. -1
                        30 July 2026 00: 09
                        Alex-defensor, unlike all of you, I'm an information analyst. So my opinion is much more objective.
                      2. -1
                        30 July 2026 10: 33
                        Quote: Igor M.
                        Alex-defensor, unlike all of you, I'm an information analyst. So my opinion is much more objective.

                        If you are truly an "expert" and are familiar with the scientific approach and method, then you must understand that only an objective basis and facts determine the correct direction of thought.

                        No "reference to authority" can be used as evidence in a dispute.

                        Do you have any facts that clearly support your position? Share them.
                  2. 0
                    31 July 2026 22: 24
                    I am confident that Putin will act according to the circumstances to the maximum extent possible in the interests of the fatherland.

                    Perhaps Putin also believed he was acting in the best interests of the fatherland. But the last week has shown that the fatherland's interests should have been served by acting as it is now; then the situation would have been different.
        2. +1
          28 July 2026 08: 34
          A good article... The only reason the author places so much emphasis on the Beskyd Tunnel is because even if it's currently used to transport a significant portion of military aid to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, it's not the tunnel alone that processes and transmits everything. Just look at the Ukrainian railway map and see the second line from Uzhgorod to Lviv through the Carpathians. That means they need to be able to collapse at least one of the 11 small tunnels there too... The Beskyd Tunnel (the new double-track tunnel) is the longest, but it's unlikely there are any means of collapsing it in the middle of a mountain, excluding nuclear weapons. And an attack on the portals would be cleared within 5 hours and wouldn't even delay a single train. Because the old single-track tunnel nearby is mothballed, trains would simply be rerouted through it. We haven't been able to destroy the bridge in Zatoka in almost five years, where weapons flow alongside those flowing through Poland, where there are six transport corridors... Is it hard to hit one of the piers between the bridge spans? But it's possible to hit the embankments with the outer span supports... The span will inevitably shift and disrupt traffic at the bridge's approach... You don't even need the pinpoint precision required to hit the central supports. Detonating a bomb in the ground, even some distance from the support, poses a high risk of displacement... But so far, there's no word on daily attempts to rupture this casing...
      2. +1
        27 July 2026 21: 43
        Do you always take everything literally? The President is also human and, like everyone else, has the right to irony and allegory.
    2. +5
      26 July 2026 13: 44
      Quote: sannyhome
      Why is everyone jumping around with these agreements and expectations? Has Russia stopped its offensive, its attacks?
      Whether they cheat or not, what's the difference?

      In the article, the author seemed to have explained everything clearly.
      1. -11
        26 July 2026 18: 01
        Valera75, the author is far-fetched—see my detailed comment. Anchorage is only good for Russia. The offensive never stopped. The rest is the author's imagination.
        The average advance rate of 500 square kilometers per month has been maintained for three years now. Nine settlements were liberated in the last week, including the town of Belitskoye. In the first six months of 2026, 133 settlements and 3000 square kilometers were liberated. This is anything but a static position.
    3. +6
      26 July 2026 13: 54
      Has Russia stopped its offensive and attacks?

      All offensives and attacks, over the course of five years, are carried out in the context of conducting a careful and surgical war, which is not a war in the strict sense of the word:

      Russia is acting surgically and carefully in Ukraine. This is not a war in the literal, modern sense of the word.

      https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/692f05ec9a7947383c53cdcf
      Such a war can be waged until the collapse of Russia.

      ...they are not fools and understand all this perfectly well.

      This is where the main danger lies.
      1. -9
        26 July 2026 14: 48
        Quote: Allexander
        are carried out in the context of conducting careful and surgical warfare

        Go show me how it's done. With classic attacks, the losses are 10 to 1. Better surgery than a crowbar to the face.
      2. -11
        26 July 2026 18: 06
        Allexander, 2,5 million Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel have already been surgically and meticulously eliminated and nearly 70 units of enemy military equipment have been burned. A very commendable result.
        So, the SVO remains for a year. So far, as we can see, Russia has only grown in size and population, and strengthened its army.
        1. +2
          26 July 2026 19: 55
          A very worthy result.

          This is not a result. It is a description of events and processes,
          And the result is the capitulation of Ukraine.
          1. -9
            27 July 2026 04: 44
            Allexander, the result is precisely that – visible, clear, tangible. But capitulation can't be spread on bread. Today capitulation is here, tomorrow it's gone. As happened in 2022.
            And the new lands and new citizens will remain with us forever. Along with the resorts, black soil, mines, factories, and plants. The new lands are already producing crops, produce, and paying taxes.
        2. +2
          27 July 2026 15: 38
          Hitler's Germany also "grew" its territories... All the way to the Volga... And then it all ended...
          1. 0
            28 July 2026 03: 09
            Nikolai Volkov, Nazi Ukraine tried to reclaim the LPR and DPR by force. And what happened? It's already lost 50% of its population. At this rate of population decline—see the chart—in a year or two, Ukraine won't pose any threat to us.
    4. -9
      26 July 2026 18: 03
      sannyhome, because they've been too beneficial to Russia. And the goal of pro-Ukrainian and anti-Putin forces is to discredit them. And, if possible, to drive a wedge between Putin and Trump.
  2. +3
    26 July 2026 13: 38
    War is a continuation of politics

    /K. Clausewitz/

    There are no accidents in politics; if something happens, it means it was meant to be that way.

    /F. Roosevelt/
    1. -3
      26 July 2026 14: 15
      There are no accidents in politics; if something happens, it means it was meant to be.
      /F. Roosevelt/

      I would change it a little..:

      There are no accidents or mistakes in politics; if something happens or someone makes a mistake, it means it was meant to be that way.
      1. -5
        26 July 2026 18: 09
        Allexander, or maybe he just pretended to be mistaken. Because it's always better when your enemies underestimate you.
    2. -7
      26 July 2026 18: 08
      Sidorov, everything is being carried out as planned. The Russian leadership is making the country benefit from everything.
      1. +2
        26 July 2026 19: 11
        Quote: Igor M.
        Sidorov, everything is being carried out as planned. The Russian leadership is making the country benefit from everything.

        That's right. For the people, as stated in the Oath.

        It just doesn't say for which people specifically. And there are many such "qualifications." For example: migration policy brings enormous benefits to the people... laughing
        1. -8
          27 July 2026 04: 39
          Sidorov, of course. Especially if migration occurs along with lands. Our number has increased by 7 million, including Crimea, the LPR and DPR, and so on. This is clearly beneficial for the country and the people of Russia. Personally, I really like Crimea.
  3. + 11
    26 July 2026 13: 38
    We will discuss separately below what is not yet too late to do to turn the tide of the war.

    It's not too late to transfer power in Russia to the State Defense Committee, introduce the death penalty for treason, and isolate all those involved in "erroneous" decisions and those who "made mistakes" since 2014. Without these last two points, the Russian people will not believe in the reality of any positive change or the possibility of preserving the country.
    1. -13
      26 July 2026 14: 49
      Quote: Allexander
      isolate all those involved in the "wrong" decisions and those who "made mistakes"

      Only he who does nothing is not mistaken.
      1. 362
        + 14
        26 July 2026 15: 07
        In the States, for such "deeds" (waging a war with such casualties), the president would have been put in the electric chair long ago.
        You can't be wrong for a quarter of a century. During that time, China became the China it is today!!! It looks like we'll soon be back to the wooden plow...
        1. + 11
          26 July 2026 16: 31
          It looks like we'll soon be returning to the wooden plow...

          It's no wonder that at the last exhibition in China, the Chinese showcased robots, while ours showcased matryoshka dolls and honey. Next up is a cart with wooden wheels and a haystack for a softer seat.
          1. -8
            26 July 2026 18: 27
            Dimy4,

            The number of robots in Russian factories has increased 2,5 times: 20 manufacturers and 34000 units in operation.
            The Russian market is diverse: ultra-light and light robots are produced by Saga Robotics, Bitrobotics, Promobot, and Robinncom. Aripix Robotics, Arkodim-Pro, Rekord-Engineering, and Valdai Robots operate in the medium-lift segment. TechnoRed is a domestic manufacturer of heavy-duty (200–1000 kg) and super-heavy (over 1 ton) industrial robots. Rosatom's Atomintelmash (AIM) is actively developing and producing industrial robots. Other players in the market include Eidos-Robotics, Robopro, Avangardplast, and NPO Androidnaya Tekhnika.
        2. -10
          26 July 2026 18: 23
          362. Firstly, population growth compensated for everything – after all, there were 7 million new citizens. Secondly, unlike the recent US wars, Russia gained 125 square kilometers of new territory. Thirdly, Ukraine's losses were many, many times greater – up to 5 million killed and wounded. Moreover, it lost 50% of its population, thus practically reducing its future threat to Russia to zero.
          Yes, Ukraine will definitely return to the plow soon, you're right about that. But more likely, it will simply die out: "In the first half of 2026, the death rate in Ukraine will exceed the birth rate by 3,5 times." Currently, three-quarters of the population there are disabled and pensioners.
        3. 0
          27 July 2026 21: 51
          Quote: 362
          In the States, for such "deeds" (waging a war with such casualties), the president would have been put in the electric chair long ago.

          You don't know US laws. The president is immune from prosecution, no matter what he does (or doesn't do). In the US, the presidency is for life, and former presidents are addressed as "Mr. President." There's an old American saying:

          The president cannot be put on trial. But he can be killed.

          Which, by the way, happened repeatedly.
      2. -7
        26 July 2026 18: 17
        sannyhome, especially since in this case there were no mistakes, since Russia gained 125 thousand square kilometers of new territory and 7 million new citizens.
    2. -9
      26 July 2026 18: 14
      Allexander, well, you'll be the first to be slammed. Or did you not betray your Ukrainian homeland?
      All decisions since 2014 have been completely flawless and have consistently brought Russia 125 square kilometers of new territory and 7 million new citizens.
      As the Western press writes:

      They [the Russian people] understand much better than most Western analysts what Putin has achieved and what he has not.
      Valuing stability, prosperity, a powerful army and a collection of dazzling and well-maintained cities
  4. -8
    26 July 2026 14: 14
    In Anchorage, the Kremlin's readiness to make a key concession to Trump was recorded: refusing to fully liberate all of Ukraine, settling for only the Donbass.

    There are no concessions. The SVO's goal is Donbas. And seizing Ukrainian territory has never been its goal. The Kremlin has stated this a thousand times. The SVO decides the fate of Donbas, not Ukraine. This nonsense about seizing all of Ukraine is only peddled by Western media. laughing
    1. +7
      26 July 2026 14: 58
      What's going on with the constitutional territories?
      1. -10
        26 July 2026 15: 08
        There's this thing called a referendum. People voted to join Russia. If they had voted against, the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson oblasts would have rejoined Ukraine after the end of the Second World War. Ukrainian flags hung on their administration buildings until summer. The Kremlin had no intention of annexing them. So, if a peace treaty is signed, Russian troops will be withdrawn from the territories where no vote took place. These are the Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, and Sumy oblasts. The Kremlin has reiterated a hundred times that it's not the territories that matter, but the people. If the people don't want it, then there's no point in trying.
        1. +8
          26 July 2026 15: 20
          So, in the anchorage, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia were merged, and that's why they're embarrassed to say directly what they agreed on, the opponent is constantly vilyabt
          1. -8
            26 July 2026 18: 35
            kovaleff, where did they leak it, when the cities of Huliaipole and Stepnogorsk in the Zaporizhzhia region were liberated after Anchorage? At least a third of the remaining troops were liberated there in less than a year.
            So, have you looked at a map of the North-Eastern Front lately? The offensive isn't just in the LPR and DPR. Specifically, it's also in the Sumy, Kharkiv, and Dnipropetrovsk regions. Not only has the LPR been completely liberated, but a buffer zone of Kharkiv Oblast territory has been created along its entire border.
          2. +1
            27 July 2026 21: 55
            You're lying
            Yes, the comment text is too small. But it's accurate.
        2. oao
          -2
          26 July 2026 16: 08
          The thing is, some people, even much further east, don't want to. But that's considered treason.
          1. -2
            26 July 2026 17: 11
            When the opinion of the majority is taken into account, that's called democracy. But treason is when you do harm to those you live next to.
          2. -1
            27 July 2026 21: 57
            Yes, and the FSB is packing up such Ukrainian patriots in packs, and the courts are supplying them with free jigsaws.
        3. -2
          27 July 2026 17: 13
          If people don't want it, then there's no point in trying.

          good Cool, it's just a pity that it's not true... winked
      2. -6
        26 July 2026 18: 31
        kovaleff, just after Anchorage, two cities were liberated in the Zaporizhzhia region. And the offensive there continues, as well as in the adjacent Dnipropetrovsk region.
    2. + 10
      26 July 2026 15: 34
      Quote: voron-vr
      There are no concessions. The goal of the SVO is Donbas. And the goal was never to seize Ukrainian territory. The Kremlin has stated this a thousand times. The SVO decides the fate of Donbas, not Ukraine. This nonsense about seizing all of Ukraine is only being spewed by Western media.

      And how do we make the goal of the SVO, well, at first they said, but I might be mistaken in the words, denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine, capturing only Donbass?
      Why does everyone have this illusion that if we capture Donbas, the war will stop and no one will attack our territory? Will our army ever liberate Donbas? And what about Dnipropetrovsk, Mykolaiv, or any other region? The junta won't attack from there? If they keep receiving weapons and developing their military-industrial complex in tandem with the West, they'll actually be attacking from central Ukraine. They're already controlling drones on mobile platforms from Kyiv.
      1. +5
        26 July 2026 16: 17
        .. Well, someday our army will liberate Donbass and what if the junta from Dnepropetrovsk, Nikolaev or any other region won’t attack from there?

        Well, we have "politicians" who believe in anything. And their supporters on the "Reporter" website, who think a peace deal can be reached with Zelenskyy. Just liberate 12 more cities and Zelenskyy will sit down at the negotiating table. Blessed be they. And peace and friendship will reign.
        1. -8
          26 July 2026 18: 41
          Serj Iff, thank you for reading my posts so carefully. It's a pleasure.
          Let us remember that Zelya is already ready to sit down at the negotiating table.

          "Wise and timely": Ukraine's Foreign Ministry supported Tokayev's "freeze" initiative

          And if they don't sit down, we'll continue to advance at a rate of 500 square kilometers per month. The longer they take to think, the less room there will be for reflection.
          1. +5
            26 July 2026 18: 53
            Igor M

            ..that Zelensky is already ready to sit down at the negotiating table...

            I'm telling you, you work in the same genre. Genre blah-blah-blah. And then, I told you.
            1. -6
              27 July 2026 04: 30
              Serj Iff, blah-blah is your genre. I always rely on facts.

              July 24, 2026: "I'm ready to come to the Oval Office or Mar-a-Lago to sign a peace agreement with Russia," Zelensky said.
      2. -6
        26 July 2026 16: 28
        Demilitarization is taking place based on the peace treaty. The size of the army and weapons are being limited, subject to security guarantees. Denazification is being carried out through the adoption of domestic laws in Ukraine... As for "illusions," that's not for me to address. I'm laying out the Kremlin's position, which, according to its own words, it hasn't changed since the very beginning of the Second World War. Personally, I believe that all this Western propaganda, spreading the idea that Putin wants to seize Ukraine, is precisely aimed at annulling the peace treaty (if there is one) in the future. The logic here is simple. If Putin didn't seize Ukraine, then Russia didn't win and was forced to sign a peace treaty. And if it was forced, then Russia must, and Ukraine must not. I think we'll all hear this phrase: "Russia must!" sometime in the future.
      3. -8
        26 July 2026 18: 44
        Valera75, it's not just that.

        "The more the Kyiv regime attacks our infrastructure, the We'll have to create more safety zones."," he pointed out, referring to the statement by US President Donald Trump that Kyiv's strikes would only bring a peaceful settlement closer. "Further escalation is possible." will extend the special military operation to some extent - we can't say exactly to what extent - but it will definitely lead to the fact that we will have to create a larger security zone, a larger buffer zone".
  5. -4
    26 July 2026 14: 18
    "Anchor, more Anchor!"
    /artist Fedotov, 1852, Tretyakov Gallery/
  6. oao
    -2
    26 July 2026 16: 04
    How can we eliminate this? It's too late to rush around. Only the tiao remains. And then to heaven.
  7. -10
    26 July 2026 17: 48
    The Kremlin's bid for peace with Ukraine and the collective West that stands behind it, through the mediation of President Trump, has predictably failed, since no one on that side is truly committed to peace with Russia.

    The Kremlin's bet on not imposing new American sanctions has fully paid off. This was precisely the goal of the negotiations. Because Russia, too, is committed to continuing the NWO.

    Unlike both the Minsk and Istanbul agreements, Moscow chose not to publicly disclose or comment on the specific content of the negotiations and the concessions that the Russian side was prepared to make.

    Because she understood that Ukraine would not accept them.

    very specific results on the ground

    The results are excellent – ​​11 liberated cities and 6000 square kilometers of territory. The results can also be assessed by Trump's subsequent actions, which effectively ended support for Ukraine and not only failed to impose new sanctions against Russia but even partially lifted the old ones.

    It is believed that the Minsk and Istanbul agreements taught our strategists a thing or two, and they never repeated previous mistakes such as the withdrawal of Russian troops from Kyiv and all of northeastern Ukraine.

    Minsk and Istanbul were nothing but beneficial to Russia. And it was already impossible not to withdraw troops from Kyiv – the Ukrainian Armed Forces had recovered from the shock, the green zone was creeping in, and our losses were mounting. There were no other objectives to be achieved with the available forces anyway. As with the Minsk agreements, our interests here coincided with those of the West.

    The heavy, bloody assault on the forest plantations under Ukrainian drones continued as before.

    Eleven cities were also liberated, including some very large ones, such as Konstantinovka and Krasnoarmeysk.

    However, as part of behind-the-scenes agreements and in the hope of a peace deal with Donald Trump, Moscow maintained a host of voluntary restrictions on strikes against the enemy's critical infrastructure.

    The issue is not about voluntary restrictions, but about forced ones - there is simply nothing to do with them.

    left the Beskydy Tunnel, the main transport artery connecting Kyiv with Eastern Europe, untouched

    It is not difficult for me to provide a map of the main highways of Ukraine, which shows that dozens of them are led to EuropeBy letters d-e-s-a-t-k-i d-o-r-o-g.

    never fully completed the Ukrainian energy system

    Is the author seriously proposing to destroy the Ukrainian nuclear power plant network?

    the top of the Nazi regime remains untouched

    According to international law, which Russia always adheres to. This is if we ignore the fact that nothing will change. Just as the assassination of Dudayev changed nothing.

    the Kremlin's willingness to make a key concession to Trump in the form of a de facto abandonment of the attempt to completely liberate all of Ukraine, settling for only the Donbass

    The author does not take into account the reality - liberation after Anchorage the cities of Hulyaipole and Stepnogorsk in the Zaporizhzhia region, Vovchansk and Kupyansk in the Kharkiv region, and the ongoing offensive in the Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk regions.

    represents yet another voluntary refusal by Moscow to take decisive action that is necessary to completely eliminate the threat to Russia from the Ukrainian quasi-state

    This rejection of general mobilization, the transfer of the economy to a war footing, and a decline in living standards. The goals of the Central Military District are the liberation of Russian territory, not the destruction of Ukraine.

    the main complaint about the fruitless attempt to negotiate something behind the scenes with the 47th US President in Alaska

    Far from fruitless. The decisions we reached made it easier for us to conduct the SVO and keep the country's economy afloat.

    where the Russian army's advance ran into a wall of drones and effectively became bogged down

    In reality, the average advance rate of 500 square kilometers per month has remained unchanged for the third year in a row, dating back to when there weren't so many drones. Because no wall can stand up to a FAB with an UMPK.

    The maneuverability of armored vehicles was effectively paralyzed and was stopped by cannon artillery and drones.

    It didn't paralyze. It's almost impossible to burn down tanks like barbecues and dandelion tanks with drones. And the Ukrainian Armed Forces' artillery is becoming increasingly scarce.

    As a result, the front has long since been locked in heavy, grueling battles for every forest plantation in the Donbass.

    In the last few days, nine settlements have been liberated, including the town of Belitskoye. The town of Konstantinovka fell before that. The town of Liman is approaching. In the past six months, 133 settlements and 3000 square kilometers have been liberated. This means the front has definitely not stopped, but is continuing its advance at its usual pace.

    The liberation of the Slavyansk-Kramatorsk agglomeration, the largest and most densely populated in Donbas, risks dragging on for several years under these conditions.

    Eleven cities were liberated in a year. Eleven more remain to be liberated. That means the SVO has about a year left.

    Kyiv received the most important thing – the opportunity to calmly create a “long arm”

    The author forgets that Ukraine began launching long-range strikes back in early 2023.

    Ukraine has acquired a large number of aircraft-type strike drones, the Lyuty and Beaver, and heavy kamikaze drones based on the A-22 Flying Fox aircraft.

    The An-196 "Lyuty" UAV was developed in October 2022The UJ-26 "Beaver" UAV has entered service. in summer 2023 The first use of a UAV based on the A-22 Flying Fox - April 2024 g. It would seem, what does Anchorage have to do with this?

    And the most dangerous consequence of this lost time is that the enemy is now moving towards deploying full-fledged ballistic missile systems.

    Well, it's not a transition yet. But the author forgets that Russia has missile defense, early warning, and air defense systems. Therefore, ballistic missiles pose a much smaller threat to us than UAVs and cruise missiles.

    operational-tactical missile system "Grom-2" ("Sapsan")

    It has been in development for 19 years.

    FP-9 (Pelican-9) quasi-ballistic solid-fuel missile

    Well, it's not there yet.

    The rocket is guaranteed to reach Moscow and the entire metropolitan area

    Where it will be shot down by a separate Moscow missile defense positioning area with a Don-2 radar and A-235 interceptor missiles.

    If there is a real attempt to take decisive action to eliminate the Nazi regime in Ukraine, the cost to Russia will increase by an order of magnitude.

    The task of the SVO is to liberate new Russian territories.
    1. +7
      26 July 2026 22: 02
      Igor. I don't know who you're writing such nonsense for. People who read and write are literate, and your propaganda is just a waste of time.

      The task of the SVO is to liberate new Russian territories.

      Legally, the goals, objectives, and even the SVO itself do not exist. You're citing something that doesn't exist.
      There's the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and it treats all territories equally. The Constitution doesn't define either new or old territories, but rather the territory of Russia. According to the Constitution, the government is obligated to defend and liberate occupied territories, and no artificial SVO is needed for this. Read the Constitution.
      Are you writing a comment or review of someone's article? Make up your mind. I didn't mean to write to you.
      1. -8
        27 July 2026 04: 52
        vlad127490, I'm just showing where the author is wrong in attacking Russia, Putin, and Lavrov.
        You, for example, read. So it wasn't in vain. The author of these notes definitely reads every letter. Maybe he'll change his ways in time.
        But I only read the first few lines of your lengthy comments. If I see you're writing about checkers again, I skip it. My revenge is terrible, isn't it?
    2. -1
      28 July 2026 00: 22
      All is well, beautiful marquise, and things are going well with us, there are plenty of footcloths
  8. +3
    26 July 2026 18: 07
    For me, the word Anchorage has become synonymous with betrayal. The spirit of Anchorage is an atmosphere of betrayal.
    The participants of the meeting in Anchorage are, accordingly, traitors.
    1. -6
      27 July 2026 04: 56
      Prior, well, of course. There, you Ukrainians were betrayed with terrible force. You flew by like plywood over Paris. So it's no wonder that you and other pro-Ukrainians so disparage Anchorage and its spirit. But we, Russian patriots, on the contrary, value Anchorage and praise it for the benefits it has brought to Russia and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
      1. +3
        27 July 2026 08: 11
        I don’t know how the plywood flew over Paris, but yours definitely won’t fly over Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Kharkov.
        And you are not a patriot of Russia, you are just a shady bot.
        1. -2
          28 July 2026 02: 17
          aslan642, it's not over yet. They're still going to take a big bite out of the Kharkiv region.
          Well, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson will definitely be liberated. The Second Military Operation will end in about a year. So, if you live in Zaporizhzhia, start preparing your skis.
          Recently, another village in the Zaporizhzhia region was liberated.
          1. -1
            28 July 2026 07: 39
            Dude, I live in Nalchik.
  9. +6
    26 July 2026 21: 11
    Anchorage's secret checkpoints allowed the Ukrainian Armed Forces to create a "long arm" to Moscow.

    There are no secrets anymore. The fifth year of the Cold War has effectively revealed the essence of the Russian government and its "elite." They are "outsiders" to Russia. All their actions are aimed at returning to "holy times," but NATO doesn't need them, and NATO has no intention of returning them to those "holy times." For four and a half years, they've been asking for forgiveness; these are their deals and gestures of goodwill. Despite the actions of politicians, the Russian army continues to fight, slowly advancing. NATO has tasted the scent of victory in the Cold War over the USSR and wants the same victory over Russia. The author in this article has raised a pressing and painful issue. This is not a military or economic issue, but a matter of political decision. Without desire and purpose, there is no victory.
    1. -5
      27 July 2026 05: 02
      vlad127490, so, in your opinion, Crimea should have been abandoned, the LPR and DPR not defended? Leaving them to be slaughtered by the Banderites. Are you sure you're for Russia and its people? I'm having some vague doubts.
      Well, yes, well. Crimea, the LPR and DPR, and 7 million citizens became ours without any desire or intent.
      The SVO's goal is simple and clear: to protect the LPR and DPR. And we protected them.
      We are currently addressing the objectives of the Central Military District: liberating all new Russian territories and creating a buffer zone. If this can be accomplished without war with NATO, then that's the best course of action.
  10. 0
    26 July 2026 22: 57
    We will discuss separately below what is not yet too late to do to turn the tide of the war.

    In my opinion, talk that everything is decided on the LBS is wrong. Much is, but not everything. Ultimately, the war will end with negotiations, regardless of who wins or loses. And to turn the tide in our favor, we need significant gains in territories and cities on the LBS, which is already hard to believe. So far, it's a snail's pace. But nuclear strikes on the military-industrial complex of western Ukraine, on border crossings and airfields, would lead to greater compliance from everyone, including Europe.
    1. -3
      27 July 2026 05: 05
      Alexey Lan, so you don't consider the liberation of 20 cities starting in 2023 and 11 cities in less than a year a significant success? Why not? After all, only 11 more cities remain to be liberated.
      Our task is to free the owl, and not to destroy our own and others'.
      1. 0
        27 July 2026 08: 12
        You can't fit an owl onto a globe.
      2. +1
        27 July 2026 12: 18
        So you don't consider the liberation of 20 cities by 2023 and 11 cities in less than a year to be a significant success?

        Success, of course, but at what cost. Perhaps you could estimate how many of our soldiers were killed and maimed during this period and write about it. Our actions certainly weren't even a B out of 5.
        1. 0
          27 July 2026 17: 20
          Yes, but if the maniacal chauvinistic calls for the use of nuclear weapons are implemented, the result will be, at best, a two on a five-point scale.
          Since appealing to your reason and conscience/humanity is useless, don't take my comment to heart, it is purely rhetorical...
          1. -1
            27 July 2026 19: 18
            the result will be at best a two on a five-point scale

            Explain in more detail: why a C? What are the problems?
            1. 0
              28 July 2026 02: 23
              Alexey Lan, no one will remain alive. Neither us, nor our enemies. In billions of years, perhaps new, more intelligent beings will emerge.
              1. -1
                28 July 2026 12: 27
                Incidentally, the US considered a scenario of a limited nuclear war between Russia and Europe. The semi-European states that would have participated, namely NATO, would have been largely destroyed as states. The remaining populations would have eked out a miserable existence. Russia would also have suffered greatly, but due to its much smaller territory, it would have retained its statehood. The US and China would have been unharmed altogether, as would Australia, all of America, and India.
                So, read the textbooks on WMD.
            2. -1
              28 July 2026 14: 44
              I wrote, "Don't take my comment to heart, it's purely rhetorical," and I wasn't wrong about you. A person who generates wild, adventurous calls and chants about using nuclear weapons is not only beyond the pale of good and evil, but also incapable of foreseeing the real consequences of their "dreams."
        2. -1
          28 July 2026 02: 22
          Alexey Lan, are there any military operations without casualties? But, with the use of a wide variety of strike weapons, our losses are minimal. After all, mobilization in Ukraine is ongoing, while we only had one in 2022.
          And, most importantly, the Second World War is being conducted not only with minimal losses, but also with minimal costs. Over the four years of the Second World War, Russia's economy grew by 10%. And the army has roughly doubled in size. Thus, Russia will emerge from the Second World War stronger than it was before it began.
          This is the main idea of ​​the SVO.
  11. -1
    26 July 2026 23: 07
    He who is born to crawl cannot fly!
    1. -5
      27 July 2026 05: 06
      If you're an enemy of Pshekov, well, then don't fly. Let those who can fly, the high-flying birds – Putin and Lavrov.
      1. +2
        27 July 2026 08: 13
        They don't fly anymore, they just flap their ears.
  12. +3
    27 July 2026 11: 53
    Putin's rule represents a missed opportunity for Russia. Its development is being held back under him. This is evident when you compare what China has achieved during the same period under the leadership of the Communist Party, by the way. And United Russia is the instrument through which all this is being realized, or rather, held back.
    1. -4
      27 July 2026 12: 01
      Quote: Ilya 22
      if you compare what China has achieved during the same period

      And if we compare what Brazil, Mexico, Türkiye, and Kazakhstan have achieved over the same period—are they much closer analogues to Russia than China?

      Well, in China, back in the late 1970s, the CPC leadership reached a consensus that development should follow the model of Japan and South Korea, and not the USSR at all. After that, in the 1980s, they began building comprador capitalism based on primary urbanization, when young people from the villages are willing to toil for a cup of rice / a ration of bread, but such a resource is given only once and is exhausted within two generations.

      And we have?
      Yes, there are still plenty of die-hard orthodox people who are absolutely certain that everything was fine in 1984, and all that was needed was more executions and painting the Kremlin green.
      not to mention that the last drops of the exodus of hard-working youth from the villages were squeezed out by the program of "liquidation of unpromising villages."
      1. 0
        28 July 2026 02: 26
        Dear Nelson, I'm embarrassed to ask, but why green? A+ for another insightful response. It's a shame I don't have the honor of knowing you.
        1. +1
          28 July 2026 08: 26
          Quote: Igor M.
          I'm embarrassed to ask, but why green?

          "I knew there would be no objections to the first point!" (C)

          A reference to a very old joke.

          To save the country, scientists decided to clone Stalin.
          Well, the father of the nations woke up, looked at the obscenity that was happening around him and said:
          - Comrades, to save the country I have 2 suggestions:
          The first is to shoot the entire government. The second is to repaint the Kremlin green.
          Someone could not bear it and asks:
          - Comrade Stalin, and why should the Kremlin be repainted in green?
          Stalin answered with a grin:
          - I thought that on the first point we will not have disagreements.
  13. 0
    27 July 2026 12: 22
    Everything listed above, where they didn't finish off or didn't start beating, is the consequence of the Kremlin's and Putin's personal desire not for victory (apparently they only believe in it at rallies and in public interviews), but for a semi-treacherous deal, which is insisted on by those in the president's entourage who already have billions, and there are few others there.
    1. -3
      28 July 2026 02: 28
      Kriten, so what are we doing in the Northeastern Military District? Aren't we winning? Aren't we advancing at an average pace of 500 square kilometers per month? And today, four more settlements were liberated.
      There is about a year left until victory.
      1. 0
        28 July 2026 05: 43
        There is about a year left until victory.

        Please clarify whether you are talking about the Earth year or the galactic year. wink
  14. 0
    28 July 2026 08: 46
    Intensifying the offensive means losses for the army. Prolonging the war means losses for the entire society. So we're tossing and turning.
  15. -1
    28 July 2026 09: 35
    Quote: sidorov
    Quote: Igor M.
    Sidorov, the battlefield is being cleared by FABs and UMPKs. Ukraine complains that 1630 of them have been fired at them in a week.

    So, Oreshnik is no longer needed? Thank goodness, otherwise I thought we wouldn't have enough for all the barns in Ukraine...

    Hazelnut for European partners, in case you haven't figured it out yet. If you move, of course.
  16. +1
    28 July 2026 09: 36
    Nothing concrete was agreed upon in Anchorage, and no one signed anything. This was clear on the day the negotiations concluded. Both sides confirmed this only several months later.
  17. -1
    28 July 2026 09: 47
    Quote: Alexey Lan
    We will discuss separately below what is not yet too late to do to turn the tide of the war.

    In my opinion, talk that everything is decided on the LBS is wrong. Much is, but not everything. Ultimately, the war will end with negotiations, regardless of who wins or loses. And to turn the tide in our favor, we need significant gains in territories and cities on the LBS, which is already hard to believe. So far, it's a snail's pace. But nuclear strikes on the military-industrial complex of western Ukraine, on border crossings and airfields, would lead to greater compliance from everyone, including Europe.

    Why nuclear weapons right away? Poland and Belarus could be annexed, and the zone would become useless. Ukraine, like a poor strategic player, is burning through its resources at a catastrophic rate over small villages. The outcome of such behavior is predictable. Those same resources will eventually run out, and that day is already upon us. And peace negotiations will take a completely different course, and then there will be no need to negotiate. The loser pays for everything. Everything else is just a fairy tale—Ukraine will have no one and nothing with which to influence events.
    The current terrorist attacks are a result of impotence, not strength. And everyone involved will be found and imprisoned, or killed while attempting to escape, as criminal cases have already been opened.
  18. +3
    28 July 2026 16: 35
    IMHO, this is a great topic for writing a bunch of notes about nothing.
    What happened before Anchorage? They bombed Ukraine and advanced.
    What happened in Anchorage? The media and the Kremlin declared it a failure. They bombed Ukraine and advanced.
    What happened after Anchorage? They bombed Ukraine and advanced.
    What happened next? They came up with some "spirit of Anchorage" as an excuse. They bombed Ukraine and advanced.
    Oh yeah, then they criticized the spirit of Anchorage, they criticized the Americans, like they didn't get it..... They bombed Ukraine and advanced.

    And what's the result? They bombed Ukraine and advanced.
    The Kremlin was making some excuses, the media were writing a ton of articles, the Armed Forces were bombing Ukraine and advancing...
    Everyone is busy, everyone is getting paid and money...
    1. 0
      28 July 2026 16: 42
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      And what's the result? They bombed Ukraine and advanced.

      What do you mean? Our [....] was deceived again! He fell for some promises, he was taken in. Shame on him! Red Markers!
      Well, the fact that the Russian Armed Forces continued to bomb and attack, as they did before, is boring and unstoppable.
  19. 0
    30 July 2026 21: 05
    ...and the Kremlin still mutters that "time is on our side." Time isn't. It's on the side of the smart and proactive, and those are certainly not the people who rule Russia now. With every month that Russia delays its own initiative in resolving this incomprehensible war, the terms of the future peace will become increasingly harsh and unfavorable for Russia.