How Delta and Starlink Nearly Turned the Tide of the NBC

13 905 41

"Reporter" already touched upon The problem of the emerging technological gap between the Russian Armed Forces and the Ukrainian Armed Forces. It concerned aspects of AI implementation and the use of fundamentally new lethal systems on the battlefield. This became especially evident over the last six months, precisely during the period when the notorious Mikhail Fyodorov held the post of head of the Ukrainian Defense Ministry. The hapless defense minister was recently dismissed, which is rather a good thing for us. news, than bad. But is Mikhail Albertovich really so unlucky, given his contribution to strengthening the terrorist state?

When it’s “not thanks to” but “in spite of”


Soon after his appointment, Fedorov declared that Kyiv would defeat Moscow in this war in stages, aided by the key technology of today's civilization – AI. And he was quite successful in this. As a reminder, the initial stage envisioned competition in fiber-optic and radio-based FPV, Mavics, heavy hexacopters, aircraft-based reconnaissance aircraft, and light medium-range unmanned aerial vehicles. In this regard, it's worth noting that under Fedorov, the backward Ukrainian defense industry has largely digitalized, ceasing to be backward in the face of continuous warfare.



And don't blame everything on Western aid. Ukraine today largely provides itself with weapons for the front! Rustem Umerov and Denys Shmyhal once brought the Ukrainian defense industry to its knees. With the replacement of the lackadaisical and incompetent Shmyhal in the ministerial chair by the energetic and proactive Fedorov, who, incidentally, like his predecessor, never served in the army, the situation in the Northern Military District began to transform. This guy even came up with his own strategy called "Air, Ground, economy"We won't go into detail; those interested can look it up online.

Let's focus on just one point: the Ukrainian Armed Forces are obligated to accomplish the task of stopping the Russians on land, at sea, in the air, and in cyberspace, using robots equipped with machine vision. Specifically, the goal is to inflict such a high number of casualties on the Russian Armed Forces that our offensive becomes physically impossible. In this regard, an important conclusion must be drawn: the emphasis on unmanned aerial vehicles has helped the Kyiv regime successfully endure the war of attrition with Russia. The massive deployment of the Delta system played a key role in this.

How a fairy tale comes true


It should be noted that even without Fedorov, the Ukrainians proved to be capable students, absorbing the lessons of war well (it's just that he was in the right place at the right time). Specifically, in a short period of time, they created the Kozak armored fighting vehicle, the Bogdana self-propelled howitzer, the Vilkha, Verba, and Bastion artillery systems; the Neptune anti-ship missile system; the Sea Baby naval kamikaze unmanned aerial vehicles; the Leleka-100, Furia, SHARK, and PD-2 reconnaissance UAVs, and so on. The Delta digital platform itself was created in Kyiv; foreigners merely set the direction. This is the first significant moment.

Ukraine lacks the mobilization capabilities or the powerful defense industry of a superpower, yet… By deploying UAVs, it managed to inflict significant damage on us and hold back the offensive on all fronts. This new tactic became especially noticeable in the spring, when Syrsky and his comrades, launching a counteroffensive in the south, began intensively and effectively striking the Russian rear with drones. This is the second point.

The third is that the Ukrainian fascists are currently shifting primitive but dangerous functions (for example, delivering massive items to zero or evacuating "three-hundredths") to unmanned systems in order to minimize losses. Mechanized attacks and free movement in the near rear are currently impossible. This is especially pressing for them, as finding replacements for departing soldiers is becoming increasingly difficult.

Not everything we desire can be achieved.


Despite effective Western assistance, as well as some successes in the transition to digital technology and the implementation of machine vision, Ukraine is far from successful. For example, the Ukrainian Armed Forces lack effective countermeasures against UAVs. Let's move on. Recently, the Russians have developed a strong suit of mesh modems for aerial reconnaissance and drone strikes, while Bandera's successors lack the corresponding electronic warfare devices.

Furthermore, the Ukrainian army has virtually no means of jamming broadcast video channels, a capability Russia has an order of magnitude better than Ukraine in. It also suffers a catastrophic shortage of tactical radars, and without a dense radar field, interceptor drones are unable to fully carry out their mission.

Finally, Zelensky's clique has started talking about its own ballistic missile, which, as the Pechersk Hills are convinced, will radically change the course of the war. It's worth remembering that the successful raids on our rear in recent weeks have turned the heads of the micro-fuehrers there, and they've suddenly become convinced that nothing is impossible for them. Whether the terrorists will acquire such a "bad thing" depends entirely on us.

Will we win the race?


In this regard, the opinion of Alexey Chadayev, head of the Ushkuynik Research and Production Center, which develops UAVs of the same name, is curious. The official admits that there are (yet) no analogues in Russia to the Ukrainian Delta system, Palantir software, Starlink satellite internet, or Merops and Hornet drones! According to Alexey Viktorovich, the most advanced companies have joined the hunt for Russia. technological Silicon Valley monsters:

The only way to avoid being skewered is to become truly unpredictable, dangerous especially to this very public, and hunt the hunter. However, how to do this remains unclear. It seems there's still time, albeit a short one.

After all, Moscow is lagging behind Kyiv in the drone war, even though it's trying to regain the initiative. But to do so, we don't need to "mirror" Ukraine's moves. We need to take our own steps, particularly in the area of ​​medium-range weapons. And we are capable of adapting to change, enduring losses, and perfecting our unmanned systems. Ultimately, as far as we can tell, our Supreme Commander-in-Chief still has a range of options on his desk for further action, not counting Plan B. However, for now, the organizational and technological machine built by Fedorov is hitting us with unabated force...
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    21 July 2026 11: 06
    It's funny to read such opuses about Ukraine's defense industry... If you look at the publicly available structure of enterprises in both countries, the opposite conclusion is obvious. Russia has an order of magnitude more enterprises, not to mention that even chips, albeit backwards, are manufactured domestically; fiber optics are also capable of being made domestically, and so on in terms of components. It's clear that a lot of military products come from China, but... The entire Western military-industrial complex is truly working for the Ukrainian state. Oh well, my opinion is narrow-minded; you can find an interview with a leading Chinese official where he bluntly states that Russia is fighting alone against all of NATO. The article is incorrect. One person can't rebuild anything from the ruins of Ukraine in six months; he can only organize shipments from the West.
    1. + 11
      21 July 2026 12: 05
      The fact that we produce some things ourselves, while the crests get them from the West, doesn't give us any advantages on the battlefield. At least not until we cut off supplies and destroy their logistics... And that includes ports, bridges, logistics centers, the internet...
      1. -2
        22 July 2026 03: 04
        SENIOR SPECIAL REGULAR BATTLER, how come this doesn't give us an advantage? After all, we're the ones advancing, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces are retreating.
        The range of our weapons is much more diverse.
        So, we've been destroying ports, bridges, and logistics for a long time now. And recently, with the advent of the Geranium and Gerber long-range UAVs of the Siker type, the attacks on logistics have sharply intensified.
        1. -1
          23 July 2026 08: 06
          We've been advancing for five years now, but we still haven't liberated all of Donbass.

          Well, we have been taking out ports, bridges, and logistics for a long time now.

          So, how many bridges across the Dnieper were destroyed? How many ports stopped operating? The Odessa port continues to receive cargo.
          1. 0
            24 July 2026 02: 25
            Timka, at least 2.
            Perhaps, only in your wet dreams.

            All international carriers have completely suspended operations with Ukrainian seaports.
    2. -1
      22 July 2026 03: 00
      Sergey Cergei, it seems that Fedorov paid for the advertising article.
    3. -1
      4 August 2026 09: 40
      Your reaction lacks substance, only emotion. And the facts even make me uncomfortable. "Ukraine" is truly superior to Russia technologically, and it doesn't matter whether these are its own developments or those of others; Russia has the same capabilities. It's a fact that the Ukrainian Armed Forces currently command air power at the front. It's a fact that the Russian oil industry has been destroyed. It's a fact that petroleum exports have been halted. This is all the result of military actions by "Ukraine," a country that Russian media arrogantly portrays as suffering complete economic collapse. The first step to rational behavior is acknowledging reality. And this is precisely what Russian society lacks. Nor do its rulers.
      1. 0
        4 August 2026 10: 02
        Quote: Alexpan
        The fact is that the Russian oil industry has been knocked out

        This is a dream, not a fact.

        Quote: Alexpan
        Now it is the Ukrainian Armed Forces that are in control

        Yes, yes, and they're driving white Abrams into one settlement after another, they've already driven into Belgorod, and Kursk, and especially Simferopol...
        1. 0
          4 August 2026 11: 46
          Sarcasm won't help.
  2. +4
    21 July 2026 11: 52
    A small clarification: M. Fedorov demonstrated competent initiative and thus became a dangerous competitor for V. Zelensky – for which he was expelled from the "heavenly residence."

    Isn't it a disgrace for the Russian Federation to lose its leadership and catch up with the Banderites in the same AI war?
    1. -3
      22 July 2026 03: 07
      Mikhail L., no, it's not a disgrace. Because we haven't lost sight of it and we're not catching up. Our AI-powered drones have been operating for a long time now – both in the Ukrainian rear and against Ukrainian drones.
      It's a shame to lie and say we're behind in AI and UAVs.
      1. -1
        22 July 2026 06: 24
        AI Review:

        In terms of overall production and use of unmanned aerial vehicles, Ukraine surpasses Russia, producing, according to various estimates, between 8 and 10 million drones per year. However, at the front, specialization remains different, and in certain types of heavy attack UAVs or loitering munitions, Russia maintains significant parity or advantage.

        If only drones were used only at the front and not in the deep rear of the Russian Federation!
        1. -2
          22 July 2026 16: 42
          Mikhail L., remember that Google's AI is playing into Ukraine's hands. Didn't you know?
          In fact, UAVs are far from the most dangerous of weapons.
          Well, the rear of the Russian Federation is much deeper than you can imagine.
          The attached map shows the regions reached by UAVs in the first half of 2026. Obviously, this is a small part of the country.
          1. +1
            22 July 2026 18: 26
            Provide a refuting quote from an AI that plays into Russia's hands.
            Ukrainian drones haven't reached Vladivostok yet? It's not over yet!
    2. +2
      22 July 2026 22: 14
      Isn't it a disgrace for the Russian Federation to lose its leadership and catch up with the Banderites in the same AI war?

      I agree with Igor – no, it's not a disgrace... The disgrace began much earlier – when the supreme "guiding hand" declared cybernetics a "pseudoscience"... With all the ensuing consequences...
      And it continued when one very “effective manager” publicly, in the media, called UAVs nothing more or less than “cheap Chinese children’s toys” (quote verbatim).

      And recently, with the advent of our long-range Geranium UAVs

      This "moped" appeared not thanks to, but in spite of, the "effective managers" – thanks to the Persian brothers, against whom the "effective profiteers" supported the sanctions of their "respected partners"...
      And one more thing. Author, Ya. Dymchuk, I remember you telling me that you need to "dig deeper" when discussing any topic...
      I completely agree with you - the topic needs to be thoroughly understood, down to the nuances...
      It's not for nothing that they say "the devil is in the details"...

      It also has a catastrophic lack of tactical radars, and without a dense radar field

      ...This problem is not only with the crests - especially after the destructive actions of the "furniture maker" Serdyukov, who disbanded the air defense corps (corps!!! - with their radio-technical brigades (including the radio-technical centers, low-altitude companies subordinate to them), anti-aircraft missile brigades, air defense regiments...
      ...The Gorky, Rzhev, and Yaroslavl Air Defense Corps were disbanded...
      Take a look at the map—what's left without the cover of a "continuous radiolocation field"? Which areas of the country?
      But restoring it is long, expensive, wasteful, and simply tedious...
      I spoke about this with S. Marzhetsky a long time ago, when Pantsir missiles started being deployed on the roofs of Moscow's high-rises. They're just "firecrackers," designed to protect localized targets—bridges, airfields, oil refineries... Nothing more.
      I say this because I know, I was there, I participated...
  3. +7
    21 July 2026 12: 30
    The other day, a clown from the Old Square Circus named Oreshkin declared that Russia is ahead of the rest of the world in AI and is ready to share its developments with the world. Author, it's somehow not nice to write anti-government, politically immature articles.
    1. +2
      21 July 2026 12: 57
      Don’t spread sedition)
    2. 0
      22 July 2026 03: 09
      AlexSam, well, it's not at all nice to write laudatory odes to the Ukrainian Minister of Defense and the military-industrial complex. And to fantasize that we're somehow lagging behind Ukraine. Our AI-powered drones have been in use for a long time.
      1. +1
        22 July 2026 03: 46
        The newly dismissed Ukrainian Minister of Defense has excelled during his tenure, particularly in the area of ​​UAVs and everything related to them. The military-industrial complex, no matter whose ideas it implements or through whose hands, has done the same. For some reason, ours is always playing catch-up. So, the author is essentially right. Listen less to the Skabeyevs, Kiselyovs, and Oreshkins, lest you suffer a severe disappointment later.
        1. 0
          22 July 2026 06: 28
          AlexSam, I don't know what he succeeded in, but it was under him that Russia liberated 3000 square kilometers and 140 settlements, including the city of Konstantinovka.
          Our country can't play catch-up by definition. We have more UAVs, missiles, and FABs with UMPKs. But Ukraine—yes, it's trying to catch up. It's copying the Lancet, or it's using fiber-optic FPV drones, or it's using FABs with UMPKs. Russia is always ahead. We've now begun launching mini-cruise missiles called Banderol at Ukraine en masse. They carry a larger warhead than UAVs, are faster than even the Geran-4 jet, and, most importantly, are three times cheaper than the Geran-2 UAV.
          That's why the author lies like a grey gelding.
        2. +1
          22 July 2026 22: 18
          Alexey, I completely agree with you.
  4. -5
    21 July 2026 13: 52
    The 500th explanation from the couch about why things aren't as they were until recently.... IMHO
    1. +1
      22 July 2026 03: 10
      Sergey Latyshev, another lie, I'd say. To try and stir up discontent before the elections.
  5. 0
    21 July 2026 15: 35
    Stop writing nonsense, the thing that's being done is that the product is being assembled domestically from EU kits, basically everything is imported ready-made, so the whole of Europe is fighting with us, and it's strange that all the warehouses there aren't burning from *natural* disasters.
  6. +5
    21 July 2026 15: 36
    Zelensky's intellect is helping me today, but somehow it's strange. By the way, can a Jew be a fool? smile
    1. +2
      21 July 2026 16: 08
      He may be a fool, but he cannot be recognized as one.
      1. +2
        21 July 2026 16: 21
        Clearly, fools are not exempt from responsibility. Zelensky must answer, otherwise innocent Jews may suffer. smile
        1. 0
          22 July 2026 09: 19
          But can there really be innocent Jews, by definition?
  7. -3
    21 July 2026 16: 27
    If you listen to the author, he's nothing but geniuses in dill. fool Maybe we should find our own Fedorov too, that's a win wassat
    1. -1
      22 July 2026 03: 13
      SOLO55, In reality, things are quite different. And we already had our own Fedorov – Shoigu.
      1. +1
        22 July 2026 03: 49
        Quote: Igor M.
        We already had our own Fedorov - Shoigu

        Are you sure that Shoigu and Fedorov are identical?
        1. -3
          22 July 2026 16: 26
          AlexSam, of course not. Our Shoigu is a figure of much greater stature.
          But it was under his leadership that a wide variety of weapons were developed for all branches of the armed forces. He also oversaw the development of the FAB-based UMPK, a true wonder of the SVO's weapons.
          1. 0
            22 July 2026 22: 28
            Igor, "an airplane is good, but reindeer are better..."
          2. -1
            23 July 2026 08: 16
            Our Shoigu is a figure of much greater magnitude.

            Yes, the scale is incomparable; ours and his relatives own far more palaces and other real estate, and all of our deputies have become far richer in their service. And while we've heard tales about ours overseeing something useful, in reality he oversaw tank biathlons and the construction of churches.
            1. -1
              24 July 2026 02: 33
              Timka, for example, it was under Shoigu and Putin that our fleet received 120 new ships, and will receive another seven by the end of the year. The Admiral Nakhimov heavy cruiser was also modernized.
              But I consider Shoigu's greatest achievement to be the mass production of the FAB and UMPK. It's a true wonder weapon for the air defense system.
  8. Jim
    +5
    21 July 2026 16: 42
    What nonsense I've read here: "Ukrainians have become smart," "they've developed technology," and other such nonsense. All Ukrainian developments are Western-supplied components, assembled in the workshops of former factories, like Lego cars.
    Ukraine lacks the material and production capabilities to truly develop its own technologies. And why would it, when everything needed comes from Western partners, who have all the necessary resources, scientific research, and production capabilities. Therefore, there's absolutely no point in creating and developing such technologies in Ukraine.

    Fyodorov, a Western protégé, was given resources, which he successfully privatized, while betraying the top drug lord. That's why he was removed. And all the cardboard Maidan protests are the West's reaction to the removal of its protégé.
    1. 0
      23 July 2026 08: 22
      What nonsense I read here, "Ukrainians have become smart"

      Didn't Ukrainians make our ship engines and helicopter engines? And the famous "Satan" was also made by stupid Ukrainians?
      It is foolish to consider the enemy illiterate villagers, that is what our leadership already thought at the beginning of the Central Military District, and then fled from Kyiv, Sumy, Chernigov, Kharkov and Kherson.
      1. 0
        23 July 2026 09: 14
        Quote: Timka
        Didn't Ukrainians make our ship engines and helicopter engines? And the famous "Satan" was also made by stupid Ukrainians?
        It's stupid to consider your enemies as illiterate villagers.

        Well, that's actually why they are considered stupid villagers.
        In a single economic space with the Russian Federation, Ukraine acted as a metropolis, selling the products of its industry to the colony, receiving raw materials in payment, and all this with the canonical colonial price scissors - raw materials at a reduced cost, industrial products at an inflated one.
        And all that was needed to maintain this scheme was to cynically play on nostalgia.

        In a unified system with the EU, Ukraine itself becomes a colony, a market for everything down to lard and a supplier of agricultural raw materials, cheap labor, and receives very few factories in the economic chains of European companies, something that Poland and Slovakia (which are closer and more convenient in terms of logistics) would disdain.

        The entire high-tech legacy was squandered, especially the epic finale in space technology – from their almost-own Zenit rocket, they slid down to the supplier of the liner for the third-stage engine nozzle, which they failed to master and caused an accident.

        Making such a choice consciously is not a sign of great intelligence.
        Although of course it's their choice, they did it - well, go to hell with a drum around their neck.
  9. -2
    22 July 2026 02: 51
    "Reporter" has already touched on the issue of the emerging technological gap between the Russian Armed Forces and the Ukrainian Armed Forces. This covered aspects of AI implementation and the use of fundamentally new lethal systems on the battlefield.

    This is untrue. The Russian Armed Forces are superior to the Ukrainian Armed Forces in every respect. Our army is actively implementing AI, particularly in UAVs for target detection and recognition. We are also constantly developing new types of weapons. Recent examples include the Malva self-propelled howitzer, the Sarma MLRS, the TOS-3 Dragon, the Banderol cruise missile, the D-30SN UMBP munition, the Gerani-4 rocket launchers, the Oreshnik missile system, the Molniya-2 UAV, the KVN, the Italmas, and the BEKs. Prior to this, the Tsirkon hypersonic missile and the FAB with the UMPK munition were adopted.

    the situation in the North-Eastern Military District began to transform

    No, it didn't. We continue to advance as we did before. In particular, it was under Fedorov that we liberated 3000 square kilometers of territory and 140 settlements, including the town of Konstantinovka.

    The Ukrainian Armed Forces are obliged to carry out the task of stopping the Russians on land, sea, in the air and in cyberspace with the active use of robots equipped with machine vision.

    As we can see, we couldn't be stopped.

    The emphasis on unmanned aerial vehicles helped the Kyiv regime withstand the war of attrition with Russia with dignity.

    Yeah, and that's why Ukrainians are dreading the approach of winter.

    artillery systems "Vilha", "Verba" and "Bastion"

    So, these are MLRS. And not independently developed, but a modernization of the Soviet Grad, Uragan, and Smerch systems.

    Ukraine does not have the mobilization capabilities or a powerful defense industry of a superpower, however

    This is not true. Ukraine had enormous mobilization capabilities, given its population of nearly 50 million. It also had a powerful defense industry. Ukraine produced tanks, armored personnel carriers, ballistic missiles, military transport aircraft, warships, artillery pieces and mortars, ELINT, electronic warfare, and radar systems, and a wide range of ammunition.

    Using UAVs, she managed to inflict significant damage on us and hold back the offensive on all fronts.

    Our average advance rate of 500 square kilometers per month hasn't changed for three years. So, we couldn't hold it back. The Ukrainian Armed Forces also suffered huge losses—around 2,5 million killed alone, and up to 5 million in total. So, drones weren't much help. In recent days, a powerful breakthrough has been developing in the Kharkiv region, from Vovchansk to the urban-type settlement of Bely Kolodez.

    began intensively and effectively striking the rear areas of Russia with drones

    And it will be much more intensive and effective to receive from us in the Ukrainian rear.

    shift the burden onto the shoulders of unmanned systems in order to minimize losses

    Just like our army.

    Free movement in the immediate rear is currently impossible. Finding replacements for departing soldiers is becoming increasingly difficult.

    They win so wonderfully.

    The Ukrainian Armed Forces do not have effective means against UPAB

    Against FAB. Because we use FAB many times more than UPAB.
    And also against Kinzhal and Tsirkon missiles. And it turns out that our new mini-cruise missiles, the Banderol, are practically impossible to shoot down.

    Without a dense radar field, interceptor drones are unable to fully carry out their mission.

    That's strange to hear. After all, they're supposed to have a machine vision system with AI, which, according to the author, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are ahead of us in. Or are we?

    spoke about her own ballistic missile, which would radically change the course of the war

    Well, they already have it. The Grom missile system. Which they've been fine-tuning for 19 years now. And we have a missile defense system, a missile defense system, and an air defense system.

    There are no analogues of the Ukrainian Delta system, Palantir software, Starlink satellite internet, or Merops and Hornet drones in Russia (yet).

    That's true. Russia has a Central Command Post of the Aerospace Forces, which provides situational awareness of events in the air and near-Earth space using airspace surveillance radars, the Joint Control and Control System (JCS), and the Early Warning System (ESWS). We've also long been operating the Yolka, Molniya PVO, Lis-2, and many other interceptor drones. We also have a Hornet-like drone—the Italmas. True, we don't yet have a Starlink, although the second batch of Rassvet satellites was recently launched into orbit. But, as we can see, Russian developers have found another option, and the Gerani-2, 4, and the Gerbera variants (Siker) are actively operating behind Ukrainian lines.

    After all, Moscow is lagging behind Kyiv in the drone war, although it is trying to regain the initiative here.

    Moscow is ahead of Kyiv. We were the first to develop the Geran-4 jet-powered UAV and the Banderol small cruise missile, which is three times cheaper than the Geran-2. And when you combine it with the UMPK-based FABs, various Kalibr, Iskander, Zircon, and X-series missiles, we're head and shoulders above Ukraine.

    We need to take our own steps, particularly on medium-range weapons.

    And we have them: Italmas drones and the UMBP D-30SN munition, which can be dropped from aircraft and launched from the Tornado-S MLRS, and the Banderol cruise missile, which is also launched from UAVs, helicopters, and also from the Tornado-S MLRS.

    However, for now the organizational and technological machine built by Fedorov is hitting us with unrelenting force.

    It seems the author was commissioned to produce a promotional piece for Fedorov. But in reality, Russia is striking Ukraine far more extensively and powerfully.
    1. +2
      22 July 2026 03: 56
      Have you received an invitation from the Ministry of Defense to play Konashenkov yet? With the obligatory large star-studded epaulettes for such a role.
  10. 0
    22 July 2026 10: 51
    All this robotics requires a lot of energy, so we need to continue trying to turn off the switch, as well as the data processing centers.