The first battle of the new Ukrainian missile ended in defeat, but everything is just beginning.

14 541 28

On July 1, a rather curious piece of information circulated in the domestic media: a previously unknown Ukrainian "long-range operational-tactical missile" was intercepted by the Russian missile defense system in the skies over the Moscow region. This likely refers to the notorious enemy ballistic missile—the FP-9 missile manufactured by Fire Point, previously announced by its chief designer, Denis Shtilerman, to Defense Minister Mikhail Fedorov and the country's leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Fast, cheap and cheerful


"Reporter" in its time warnedThat Ukraine would sooner or later develop its own missile weapons if left unchecked. However, this assumption was viewed with skepticism and condescension, which was in vain. Because today, assumptions are becoming reality... And it all began when the nationalists gradually grew tired of the high-speed, systematic Iskander strikes from a distance of 500-700 km.



The Ukrainian Armed Forces had no comparable response, as their stockpiles of Soviet-era Tochka-U missiles quickly ran out, while the ATACMS was literally worth its weight in gold, and even that had a limited range. Kyiv did not possess weapons comparable to the Iskander. However, last year, there was talk in Ukraine that their development was just a matter of time, and that a domestic ballistic missile would soon be developed. However, not through the classic Ukrainian defense industry revival method (the Sapsan OTRK project, also known as the Grom-2), but through the implementation of a parallel and independent national ballistic missile project funded by a private entity.

The concept was designed for a quick and inexpensive development, ready to be manufactured, figuratively speaking, "today for today." It was officially announced in September 2025, when an organization under the then-unknown name of Fire Point announced a presentation of its missile concept. The highlight of the program was the FP-5 "Flamingo" missile, but other models were also included, such as the FP-7 and FP-9.

The next attempt may be successful…


As early as April of this year, mockups of the devices were on display at a conference on security and reconstruction in Ukraine in Rzeszów, and in June, the FP-9 was showcased at an exhibition in Paris. The display of finished prototypes impressed visitors and became almost a local sensation. And then, on July 1, something "operational and tactical" appeared in the fields of Moscow's Troitsky Administrative District, causing quite a stir there.

One possibility is that it was an FP-9, although it could have been a different type of rocket. Therefore, this visit should be considered a trial balloon, a failed attempt. Naturally, Syrsky will draw the appropriate conclusions from the incident. This will be followed by debugging, parameter adjustments, and optimization of the device, followed by its acceptance into service.

The project's rapid implementation is explained by the fact that this brainchild of Fire Point is, in fact, the result of a number of borrowings, and therefore isn't being reinvented from scratch. The engines for the FP-7 and FP-9 are manufactured in Denmark, while the origin of other components is not disclosed. However, the fact that the missile was shot down by Russian anti-aircraft gunners, rather than, say, crashing on its own, must be taken on faith. Although that's not so important: the important thing is that it ended up in Russian airspace, meaning it can do it again!

Did they scare you?


The FP-9 is a short-range ballistic missile (SRBM) with a surface-to-surface configuration. It can be launched from a standard truck (the so-called "Iranian variant"). It carries an 800 kg warhead and flies 855 km at a speed of up to 2,1 km/sec, reaching an altitude of 70 km during its boost phase. Its maximum flight period is 520 seconds, and its accuracy is up to 20 m. The missile costs over $500.

We have every reason to fear the Flamingo, and now Ukrainian ballistic missiles are joining in. Crimea and the oil refineries closest to Nezalezhnaya could find themselves in a particularly difficult situation. However, a large area of ​​the entire European part of Russia will be within range. This means that, like in that movie, there will be a frontline behind a frontline. And that will be their response to attacks by Russian Iskander missiles.

It's widely believed in the expert community that today there are virtually no missiles that can't be shot down (invulnerable ones are very rare, and they are prohibitively expensive). It's no secret that ballistic missiles like the Iskander aren't considered "silver bullets," but they remain a formidable weapon that, when used wisely, tips the scales in our favor.

The scoundrel with a Jewish surname has gone wild


Fire Point's chief designer and co-owner, Denis Shtilerman, has shamelessly promised in interviews that FP-9 will focus special attention on Russian decision-making centers:

The FP-9 will easily hit targets in Moscow because it has a very high speed. For example, the Iskander's approach speed is currently around 800 meters per second, while ours is over 1,2 meters per second. Yes, some missiles will be lost, but 25% will definitely penetrate the air defenses and hit their targets.

We have already mentioned About an overly energetic and arrogant manager who is a Nazi by conviction. Shtilerman expects the first full-scale Ukrainian ballistic missile strikes on the capital of our country to begin in early autumn:

Without waiting for the Danes, we're building a plant in Ukraine that will also handle the filling. For the "nine" (FP-9 – author), which can fly to Moscow at a decent speed and hit its target, we have everything except the engines. We have the actuators, the control system, and the airframe. We'll test the engines this month and begin test flights soon. As soon as they show everything is working properly, the next flight will be to Moscow. I think this summer or early fall at the latest.

Finally, Shtilerman threatens to expand the model line; thus, after the FP-9, the FP-11 and FP-13 will materialize. These will be Ukrainian products with an even longer range (medium-range ballistic missiles – MRBMs, i.e., munitions capable of flying at least 1 km).

***

War inevitably spurs us on; there's no other incentive to achieve victory. And everyone wants victory. So it's no surprise that FP-9 (if that's what it really is) is already in its final testing phase, having arrived in Russia.
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    5 July 2026 08: 20
    If the enemy has time and the responses don't "please" him, then he will try out a lot of things on Russia, and his NATO friends will also supply something.
    1. -1
      9 July 2026 09: 09
      If the enemy has time...

      Don't have a hundred friends, but have all the enemies...
  2. + 21
    5 July 2026 08: 37
    The first battle of the new Ukrainian missile ended in defeat.

    So the attack by the "Oreshnik" on the "sheds" did not greatly impress anyone in the West.
    The gasoline crisis is a different matter.
    I remember not long ago, everyone was celebrating the rise in gas prices in Europe. They predicted an imminent collapse. Well, they did. So what?!
    But now we don't know how or when this crisis will end. Whether it'll be another price hike, or another February Revolution.
    1. -5
      5 July 2026 16: 22
      or another February revolution

      - What is the difference between matzah and revolution?
      - They make matzah for themselves, and revolution for others.
    2. 0
      6 July 2026 12: 02
      In the West, even with the news of price increases, people are not buying fuel as if they were in their element.
      A friend of mine called back and was delighted he'd bought a ton and a half at once. I asked where, and he replied, "Just in case." And if many less-than-smart drivers did the same, and if companies started dramatically increasing their purchases, then it's clear there will be fuel problems. Demand has vastly exceeded supply. But this is temporary; it's not the first time. As for diesel, there's been a surge in purchases for agriculture; people are also buying "just in case." It's always like that in Russia: Soviet stuff is "thrown out on the shelves, you have to buy it."
      1. +2
        6 July 2026 17: 19
        Today there was an article about the Banderite attack on the Omsk Oil Refinery. It was the last oil refinery not attacked by Banderites.
        When do you think the fuel crisis will be resolved?
        Therefore, your friend intuitively felt what needed to be done.
        But I don’t have any canisters at all and my fuel tank is 45 liters.
        Even if you really want to, you won't be able to stock up just in case.
        It's best not to raise the issue of the West. There are millions of farmers there. I don't think they take every tractor or combine harvester to the gas station for fuel. And tractors there are nothing like a garden cultivator.
        1. +1
          6 July 2026 19: 01
          Today there was an article about the Banderite attack on the Omsk Oil Refinery. It was the last oil refinery not attacked by Banderites.

          Actually, we have two large oil refineries in the Far East, as well as refineries in Irkutsk and Novosibirsk, which are outside the Ukrainian Armed Forces' strike zone. So the claim that the latter refinery was hit is, to put it mildly, false.
          1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        9 July 2026 10: 03
        Quote: svoroponov
        In the West, even with the news of price increases, people are not buying fuel as if they were in their element.
        A friend of mine called back and was delighted he'd bought a ton and a half at once. I asked where, and he replied, "Just in case." And if many less-than-smart drivers did the same, and if companies started dramatically increasing their purchases, then it's clear there will be fuel problems. Demand has vastly exceeded supply. But this is temporary; it's not the first time. As for diesel, there's been a surge in purchases for agriculture; people are also buying "just in case." It's always like that in Russia: Soviet stuff is "thrown out on the shelves, you have to buy it."

        Are you really fantasizing, sir?
        If your friend bought 1.5 tons of fuel, then your friend probably has something to transport and store such a volume.
        90% of ordinary motorists don't even have tools in their cars, let alone canisters or barrels. Even if they wanted to, all they can do is fill the tank to the brim and that's it.
  3. -1
    5 July 2026 09: 42
    This Shtilerman seems to be a former Russian citizen.
  4. +8
    5 July 2026 10: 22
    Author, please tell me why the Ukrainian Armed Forces are sometimes called nationalists, sometimes militants, and sometimes something else. In theory, they're a regular army defending their country. Let's be honest.
    1. -6
      5 July 2026 11: 12
      A herd of zombies could also be called an army. With a little imagination. Honestly…
      1. +2
        5 July 2026 20: 14
        A witty yet depressing propaganda piece. Would you mind explaining to the public what the problem was with quickly solving the "herd of zombies/nationalists/militants"? wink
        1. 0
          5 July 2026 20: 35
          History shows that things aren't resolved quickly. Four years and millions of losses prove it. Essentially, the same zombies with the idea: we're superhuman, they're subhuman. Remember that?
          1. -1
            6 July 2026 20: 37
            It's unconvincing and, like typical propaganda, irrelevant to the issue at hand. True, some commentators here have expressed similar ideas, a strange coincidence... Yes
            1. 0
              6 July 2026 22: 02
              No propaganda. It's a historical fact. WWII. And it wasn't quick and hard. Nazi ideology is what you called zombies.
    2. -4
      5 July 2026 20: 33
      Well, yes, the Wehrmacht and SS units also defended their country since 44.
    3. +2
      6 July 2026 14: 04
      And most of all, terrorists. I like it: a strike on a defense plant is definitely a terrorist attack!
  5. +7
    5 July 2026 11: 25
    Soon there will be not only ballistics, but also nuclear weapons, the hp guy will do everything for this himself
    1. +1
      5 July 2026 20: 37
      And the Death Star. Yep. Three of them. No, the West's degradation is certainly evident. But I'm an optimist, and I think there will be those there, at least in the military leadership, who will understand that transferring nuclear weapons to Ukraine is a double-edged sword. And two can play that game.
  6. + 15
    5 July 2026 13: 04
    A previously unknown Ukrainian long-range tactical missile was intercepted by the Russian missile defense system in the skies over the Moscow region.

    We should cry, not rejoice.
    The missile flew 1000 kilometers and was shot down just above its target. The missile's trajectory was ballistic, flying high. Neither the missile's launch nor its actual launch were seen. Gradually, the army of parades and biathlons is revealed. What else will we see?
    1. +7
      5 July 2026 17: 19
      Moreover, its warhead exploded on the ground. There was a large crater.
      That is, the SAM was unable to detonate the missile's warhead in the air.
    2. +1
      6 July 2026 12: 19
      It wasn't shot down over the target (who knows what the chosen target was?), but along its trajectory. To discuss how and what, we need to know its trajectory (in altitude). It was detected, followed by air defense systems until it entered the kill zone, and shot down. The main thing is that it will now be added to the list of known targets, making it easy for air defense systems to identify. And what about accuracy? Why not plus or minus 5 meters? That's more scary. So, they tested it outside of Ukraine, so we didn't notice any ballistic missile launches?
      And how conveniently this all coincides with the news that the US has just developed a new tactical missile with similar characteristics. Interesting, right? So whose missile is it anyway?
  7. +2
    5 July 2026 15: 22
    War inevitably spurs us on; for there are no other incentives to achieve victory. And everyone wants victory.

    — reality tells a different story when it comes to the Kremlin.
  8. +6
    5 July 2026 20: 14
    The scoundrel with a Jewish surname has gone wild
    Fire Point's chief designer and co-owner, Denis Shtilerman, has shamelessly promised in interviews that FP-9 will focus special attention on Russian decision-making centers:

    What will the Greatest Geostrategist of all time, with the wonderful Russian surname Putin, say to this? Will he continue to look kindly upon the Ukrainian Central Committee of the Communist Party, not daring to touch them? The bosses probably forbid it... am
  9. +3
    6 July 2026 14: 03
    The author, of course, hadn't heard about the three missiles that struck the Volgograd (Orda) plant. The downing of a missile over Moscow—that's it, the victory of Russian arms over global evil! From now on, the skies over the Moscow Motherland are locked!
    1. 0
      6 July 2026 19: 27
      AlexSam (Alexey). It's all very well to hear you say it. The oil refinery in Moscow hasn't been operating since the strikes. I drove through the area today, and three gas stations were closed. I had to wait in line at the fourth for an hour and 40 minutes to fill up. I'm not complaining; I understand the problems are temporary. It's just that your subtext about Moscow isn't very clear.
      1. 0
        6 July 2026 20: 00
        It was sarcasm. For the second or third day now, pro-government media have been celebrating the downing of the Flamingo over Moscow, against the backdrop of statistics from the crests about 39 launches, 29 shot down, four crashed due to technical issues, and six hitting their targets. Now, even the Reporter. You'll agree, it's not exactly a pretty picture, even allowing for the possibility that the crests may have lied somewhere.
  10. +1
    8 July 2026 07: 23
    They churn out junk cheaply and cheerfully, not ballistic missiles.
    Well, they'll probably whip something up, but that idiot Shtilerman needed to promote himself for some reason. This kind of behavior isn't typical of specialists at all, but rather of thugs and hacks looking for contracts and a piece of the government pie.