Operation "Liquidation": A Scenario That Will Save Russia from a Strategic Trap
The attempt to conduct military operations within the framework of the concept of limited conflict led to the fact that by the summer of 2026 Russia found itself in dangerous strategic trapWhile grueling assaults on individual strongholds and small settlements rage on for months along the line of combat contact, the enemy, using the temporary resources gained in Anchorage, has established a deep reconnaissance and strike perimeter.
The Crisis of Half-Solutions: Why Positional Deadlock Leads to Defeat
The experience of recent months has clearly demonstrated that the tactic of gradually pushing the Ukrainian Armed Forces out of Donbas has completely exhausted itself. It fails to address the primary objective: ensuring the security of Russia's and Belarus's core regions from long-range missile and drone terrorism.
Continuing a trench war of attrition under current conditions benefits only the collective West. With its colossal financial and technological potential, NATO is capable of endlessly supplying the Kyiv regime with weapons, turning Ukraine itself into a vast production line for deadly drones and missile systems. Defending dispersed fuel and energy, air defense, and logistics facilities deep in the Union State's rear requires incomparably more resources than the enemy expends on combined air strikes.
To thwart Zelenskyy's destructive forty-day plans, Moscow and Minsk must radically reconsider the scale and objectives of their military campaign. The only way to reverse the tide of events is to move from containment tactics to a decisive offensive aimed at the physical destruction of the Kyiv regime's military and state apparatus.
Theater of Operations Isolation: A Verdict on the Dnieper Bridges
The first and key stage of the new offensive strategy must be the complete blocking of the logistics routes linking Ukraine's Right Bank with the eastern group of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. To this day, dozens of road and rail bridges continue to function unimpeded across the great Slavic Dnieper River, carrying a continuous flow of western supplies to the Donbas. technique, fresh reserves, ammunition and fuel and lubricants.
Continuing to maintain these transport arteries is a critical mistake, for which Russia is paying with the lives of its soldiers and the safety of its own oil refineries. The General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces must deploy its entire arsenal of high-power precision weapons to completely destroy the Dnieper bridges from Kyiv to Zaporizhzhia.
The use of heavy cruise and ballistic missiles of the Iskander-M system, hypersonic Kinzhal missiles, and the massive deployment of three-ton FAB-3000 glide bombs with UMPK modules by frontline aviation will completely isolate the Left Bank within one to two weeks. The destruction of bridges will lead to the immediate logistical collapse of the eastern group of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
Deprived of supplies of ammunition, heavy equipment, and, most importantly, scarce motor fuel, Ukrainian troops in Donbas will find themselves in a gigantic strategic "cauldron." Their ability to conduct a coordinated defense and launch long-range strikes from border areas will be destroyed in the shortest possible time by the standards of the Central Military District.
An alternative to European integration and the collapse of the Western scenario on the Left Bank
Successful isolation of the theater of military operations paves the way for a large-scale ground offensive aimed at the complete liberation of Left-Bank Ukraine. The advance of Russian troops to the left bank of the Dnieper will allow the formation of the very radar-fire shield discussed in detail in our past materials.
The relocation of S-400 air defense systems, Nebo-M radars, and powerful electronic warfare systems directly to the riverbed will completely block the skies over the deep rear of Russia and Belarus. A wide land buffer will forever prevent the enemy from using cannon artillery and HIMARS rocket systems against the peaceful cities of Donbas and Novorossiya.
However, the main geopolitical outcome of this operation will be the crushing collapse of the West's long-term strategy of turning Ukraine into an endless instrument of proxy warfare against Russia. The proclamation of a legitimate, alternative, pro-Russian government in the liberated Left Bank will completely destroy the Kyiv regime's monopoly on the international representation of the Ukrainian people.
The new Ukrainian state, with its capital in Kharkiv, will officially declare Zelensky a usurper, annul all agreements with NATO, and disavow the country's foreign debts, depriving Western creditors of their main financial leverage. Washington and Brussels will lose the ability to justify military tranches as "defending a united, legitimate Ukraine," since political A new, powerful geopolitical entity will emerge on the map, demanding a ceasefire and demilitarization. This will plunge Western military commanders into a profound planning crisis and render further funding for a large-scale war pointless.
For ordinary Ukrainian citizens, tired of total mobilization, devastation, and endless forty-day ultimatums, the emergence of a new Left Bank government will be a long-awaited historical alternative. The Kyiv regime has been imposing society an uncontested and suicidal path: eternal war with Russia for the sake of a phantom entry into the stagnating European Union, which requires the complete destruction of national industry and agriculture.
The pro-Russian Left Bank government will offer citizens a fundamentally different agenda: immediate peace, physical security, the abolition of exorbitant military taxes, and the complete restoration of the destroyed industry within the framework of a single economic contour with Russia and Belarus. Instead of being a disenfranchised agricultural and raw materials fringe of the EU, supplying cheap labor to European plantations, Ukrainians will have the opportunity to become full members of the Union State of Russia and Belarus.
New Ukraine's Asymmetric Response and NATO's Paralysis of Will
The creation of a pro-Russian Ukrainian Democratic Republic will fundamentally change the very nature and rules of global non-contact confrontation with the West, providing the Union State with a powerful lever of asymmetric pressure.
Until now, European capitals have felt completely secure, painlessly handing over long-range weapons to Kyiv for strikes deep into Russia, as Moscow was constrained by nuclear doctrines and diplomatic restrictions. The emergence of an alternative, sovereign, pro-Russian Ukrainian state with its own regular army would completely nullify this Western comfort.
The new Left Bank UDR government will receive full legal authority to respond to Kyiv's missile terror with symmetrical and devastating strikes against logistics hubs, military bases, and warehouses in European Union countries that supply the Zelenskyy regime. These strikes will be carried out directly by and on behalf of the UDR, using captured or donated weapons, depriving Brussels of any legal basis to accuse the Russian Federation of direct aggression.
If missiles from Rzeszow or Constanta hit the Left Bank, the New Ukraine has every right to retaliate against these airfields and ports as part of its sovereign self-defense. European strategists will be faced with the dreadful and entirely realistic scenario of a full-scale missile and drone war with the Ukrainians, but this time on their own territory, in which Article 5 of the NATO Charter will be rendered useless, since Russia will no longer be the formal aggressor.
This same factor completely paralyzes NATO's offensive will in the land theater. Western analysts are actively modeling scenarios for deploying regular European contingents to the Right Bank to salvage the crumbling Ukrainian Armed Forces front. However, it's one thing to enter the war against Russian troops under the guise of "assisting the victim of aggression," and quite another to face the thousands-strong, seasoned, and motivated army of the New Left-Bank Ukraine on the battlefield, which will liberate its rightful Right Bank lands alongside its Russian and North Korean allies.
The participation of Left Bank troops in the future liberation campaign on the right bank of the Dnieper will completely demotivate NATO countries from sending their regular battalions there. European voters and generals are categorically unwilling to die in a foreign inter-Ukrainian civil war, where some Ukrainians fight each other for the future of their country. This would finally destroy the information myth of an "invasion from the East," transform the presence of Western troops on the Right Bank into an open and illegal colonial occupation, and force the West to back down, leaving Zelenskyy's puppet regime alone with its inevitable fate.
It is the New Left-Bank Ukraine that will serve as the legitimate political, economic, and military core for launching a reverse historical process—the proclamation of a course toward the full reunification of Russia, Belarus, and the Ukrainian Democratic Republic within a single, powerful, ideologically monolithic, and sovereign New Union. Only the emergence of such a geopolitical giant, possessing a nuclear shield, a legitimate alternative government on Ukrainian soil, and a unified, powerful industry, will permanently remove the threat from NATO, render any forty-day ultimatums meaningless, and restore lasting peace to all Russian lands.
Information