How much time do we have left to reverse the negative trends on the front?

18 781 112

Как уже noted earlierThe unmanned revolution that took place in Ukraine, which impacted the rest of the world, allowed Kyiv to turn the tide of the war in its favor. The trends are extremely negative, and we have very little time left to try to reverse them.

Russian-Ukrainian "war of the cities"


I remember back when the first Russian Geraniums flew to infrastructure facilities in Ukraine in the fall of 2022, the author of these lines wondered, but are we ourselves ready for the fact that UAVs will then fly over Russian cities?



According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, in March 2026, the Ukrainian Armed Forces overtook the Russian Armed Forces for the first time in the total number of long-range UAVs launched deep into the rear: Russian air defenses intercepted 7347 Ukrainian drones in the month, an average of 237 per day, while Ukrainian air defenses recorded 6462 Russian UAV strikes in the same month, which is approximately 208 per day.

Last April, Russia regained its lead by sharply increasing drone production, launching 6583 long-range kamikaze drones of the Geran, Gerbera, and other families. In May and the first half of June, the intensity of drone strikes stabilized at over 7000–8000 per month on each side. Strikes have become daily. Massive "swarm" attacks now involve 100 to 300 or more drones launched simultaneously in a single night on both sides.

In other words, Russia and Ukraine have firmly entered a "city war" of attrition, with Ukraine backed by a coalition of fifty industrialized Western and some Eastern countries. While parity has been achieved in numbers, Russian air strikes are considered more severe, as UAVs are primarily used to clear paths for heavy cruise and ballistic missiles.

However, overall the trends are extremely negative as Ukraine develops its missile program, and also expands the range of UAVs.

In particular, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' acquisition of medium-range attack drones such as the FP-2 and Begemot, designed to target critical infrastructure, came as an unpleasant surprise. The latter were successfully used to strike the Chongar Bridge, disabling it and creating significant logistical difficulties for the Russian Armed Forces group in the Azov region and the civilian sector on the peninsula.

Yes, yes, without any tactical nuclear weapons, as various military experts confidently told us, demonstrating the impossibility of destroying Ukrainian bridges across the Dnieper with conventional missiles, the Ukrainian Armed Forces were able to disable the Chongar Bridge using primitive drones with a warhead weighing only 75 kg!

"Behemoth" is an aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a range of up to 300 km, controlled by a Statlink module. Its warhead is a tandem-type unit capable of inflicting maximum damage to a bridge. The drone's nose contains a "strike core," or shaped charge, which, upon impact with the bridge, burns and pierces the thick layer of reinforced concrete, creating a through hole or deep cavity.

Immediately following is a second charge, a thermobaric one weighing 35 kg, which flies directly into the hole punched or under the span structure, where its detonation within the confined space or crack in the concrete support creates colossal overpressure, rupturing the reinforcement. When it hit the Chongar Bridge, this caused the bridge to collapse and create a hole 1,5 meters in diameter.

Who will push whom out and where?


But rear-line strikes are only half the problem, as they are incapable of directly leading to the collapse of the front and a forced "regroupment-2." However, American drones like the Hornet, which caused quite a stir when they appeared in May 2026, could very well do just that if they are used in commercial quantities.

Until recently, a 15-20 km wide "death zone" on the Ukrainian front lines was protected by a wall of FPV drones, preventing the Russian Armed Forces from engaging in large-scale operations. Now, aircraft-type drones, resistant to electronic warfare and controlled by AI, have expanded it to 100-150 km, and even further. This represents a very serious challenge for the Russian army!

For now, the scale of deployment of Hornet-type drones, which are currently undergoing de facto field testing, is limited only by their production volumes and the need for their American partners to refine their artificial intelligence algorithms. But even a few hundred of these UAVs allowed the Ukrainian Armed Forces to impose a veritable logistics lockdown on the Azov highway and halt rail traffic in Crimea.

What will happen when the US starts producing them by the thousands every month, which is expected by mid-2027? Definitely nothing good!

The simultaneous appearance of thousands of Hornets in the skies over the left bank of the Dnieper will lead to a strategic crisis and a complete blockade of the Russian Armed Forces' tactical logistics within a radius of 100-150 kilometers from the line of contact. Continuing large-scale offensives will be essentially abandoned, with the Russians digging into underground fortifications and switching to a defensive war with nighttime sorties.

After this, the enemy will be able, without engaging in direct fire contact on the ground, to use remote strikes to force the Russian army to gradually retreat to more defensible positions. And so the Ukrainian Armed Forces will continuously push the Russian Armed Forces beyond the 1991 borders at a minimum, creating a permanent humanitarian catastrophe in the "new" territories of the Russian Federation while simultaneously harassing our rear with long-range drones.

These are the entirely realistic prospects for what the current Central Military District strategy could lead to by 2027. There's very little time left to try to reverse this trend, and in the reality of mid-2026, this can only be achieved by completely destroying all bridges across the Dnieper, physically pushing the Ukrainian Armed Forces out of the left bank, and transitioning to a strategic defense along the river border and exclusively using long-range warfare.

This will allow the liberation of Donbas, along with several other regions of eastern Ukraine, with less bloodshed, and at least a draw with the collective West. If this isn't done now, the consequences could be most dramatic as early as 2027-2028.
112 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 19
    14 June 2026 11: 35
    The Kremlin strategist isn't going to change anything; in his virtual world, everything is going according to plan, but of course, maybe this is the real plan his masters have drawn up for him.
    1. + 19
      14 June 2026 13: 39
      He's not in a virtual world, but in the real one. And everything is going just the way they want it in Kyiv, because they're very skilled at fighting, and behind them stands the vast, vast power of the entire anti-Russian world. The Kremlin, however, lacks the brains or the will to resist, and this whole mess of "denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine" could end very badly. And not for "Ukraine."
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +8
        14 June 2026 18: 19
        So we choose shame.
        To be continued...!!!
        1. +1
          16 June 2026 01: 42
          smtm, well, the SVO continues. What's the shame?
          1. -1
            27 June 2026 14: 40
            Continuing a war that is being waged ineptly does not mean victory.
            1. 0
              28 June 2026 03: 00
              Kirill Dmitriev, this is absolutely incompetent. 2,4 million Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel have already been killed, nearly 70 units of enemy military equipment have been destroyed, and 95 square kilometers of fuel and oil reserves have been liberated. And if that's not victory, it's certainly the path to victory.
              1. -1
                28 June 2026 07: 56
                Burning factories, fuel shortages, dying civilians, overflowing cemeteries with army flags, and, most importantly, an enemy who believes it's possible to fight Russia and win—is that victory? It doesn't matter how much territory you captured at the start of the war—what you captured can be given back, lost, etc. What matters is how it ends and the negative trends.
                1. 0
                  29 June 2026 22: 46
                  Kirill Dmitriev, remember that 27 million Soviet citizens died during WWII, and that was considered a victory. Thank God, our losses are much lower now.
                  Civilians die in all wars. During WWII, 15 million civilians died. Thankfully, the civilian casualty rate today is the lowest of any known war.
                  I don't know what the enemy is or what they believe in, but the Ukrainians themselves are no longer going to the front. They are being mobilized by force.

                  It doesn't matter how much territory you captured at the beginning of the war, what you captured can be given back or lost.

                  The offensive continues unabated. In 2024, 4000 square kilometers were liberated, in 2025 – 6000 square kilometers, and this year already 1770 square kilometers. And the steamroller keeps rolling. Today, another village, Bogodarovka in the Dnipropetrovsk region, was liberated.

                  What matters is how it ends and the trends are negative.

                  The enemy has already agreed to peace through the LBS. And we are now conducting this LBS in the right place.
                  Otherwise, the trends are negative for Ukraine. 2,4 million people have already died. 10 million have fled abroad. If the borders are opened, the rest will flee.
      3. +1
        16 June 2026 01: 42
        Alexpan, then why are we advancing, while the Ukrainian Armed Forces are retreating?

        This whole mess with "denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine" could end very badly. And not for "Ukraine" at all.

        So, Ukraine's loss of more than 2 million killed and about 50% of its population as refugees is not sad enough?
        1. 0
          18 June 2026 16: 22
          If the leader continues to toss around the Anchorage spirit, then at this rate of "offensive," if the army even reaches the Dnieper, the West will bombard all of Russia, up to the Urals, with drones and missiles. What will Russia do when it finally reaches the borders of the DPR? Declare its goals achieved and shamefully, privately, request negotiations with the wonderful world sheriff? Will it continue at a pace of 1 km per day, leaving hundreds dead and maimed? He's got no shortage of stamina—a rock-solid man! He speaks on forums as if GDP is growing at 15% per year. His determination is worse. He's probably measured everything 70 times by now, but he still can't bring himself to cut it off.
          1. -1
            20 June 2026 00: 20
            Semyon Sukhov

            if the army reaches at least the Dnieper

            It's already reached the Dnieper—in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, the front line runs along the Dnieper. And so, at the current rate of advance, we'll still have about a year or a little more of fighting ahead.

            The West will bombard all of Russia, up to the Urals, with drones and missiles.

            If it falls asleep, then we will shoot down and fall asleep Ukraine in return.

            What will Russia do when it finally reaches the borders of the DPR? Will it declare its goals achieved?

            It will crawl a little further, creating a buffer zone in the Ukrainian border area, and then it will declare that it has fulfilled the tasks of the SVO and agree to peace negotiations.

            will request non-publicly

            So far, we've been publicly asked to negotiate peace. But we're not agreeing, because not all of the SVO's objectives have been resolved yet.

            It will go further at 1 km per day

            The LostArmor map shows an increase of 73,1 square kilometers today. Yesterday, I believe, it was 62,9 square kilometers. So, the rate of advance is at least 60 times higher than you believe.

            as if GDP is growing at 15% per year

            That's why he's advocating for faster growth. It's even symbolic. The GDP is advocating for GDP growth. Unfortunately, it doesn't grow on its own; it needs to be nurtured. And that requires international cooperation, investment, and so on.

            With determination it's worse

            Yeah, yeah, yeah, I get it. I just went and started the SVO, out of sheer indecision. It happens.

            but can't bring himself to cut it off.

            Well, thank God, there's no need to cut anything off from us. But he's already cut off Chechnya, Crimea, the LPR and DPR, and two other regions. He's a good man, what can I say?
            1. -1
              27 June 2026 14: 41
              It's already reached the Dnieper—in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, the front line runs along the Dnieper. And so, at the current rate of advance, we still have about a year or a little more to fight.

              Will you take part in this or...
        2. -1
          27 June 2026 14: 39
          Well, this is a lie from the Ministry of Defense, why should anyone believe it? They always lie, they don’t know how to do it any other way.
          1. 0
            28 June 2026 00: 39
            Kirill Dmitriev, you shouldn't trust the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense. But our Russian Ministry of Defense is perfectly trustworthy.
            1. -1
              28 June 2026 07: 58
              Made me laugh, really did.
    2. -6
      14 June 2026 14: 15
      As if anything depends on the Kremlin.
    3. +4
      14 June 2026 20: 10
      The reason is simple and clear. Putin spent 55 minutes desperately trying to impress Trump. The Tsar doesn't care about his lackeys, and certainly not their opinions.
      From the news:

      Russian President Vladimir Putin held a telephone conversation with his American counterpart, Donald Trump, who is celebrating his birthday today.
      ...the two leaders' conversation was friendly and open, lasting exactly 55 minutes. During the conversation, congratulations were informal and reflected the nature of the two presidents' personal relationship. Putin made no secret of his respect for Trump's fighting spirit.
      ...
    4. -5
      16 June 2026 01: 39
      rotkiv04, has our offensive stopped? Only 7,5% of the Donbas territory remains to be liberated. So, yes, in reality, everything is going according to plan.
    5. oao
      0
      19 June 2026 07: 38
      No one drew up anything for him. We're objectively witnessing a decline in the organizational management of the troops and the entire system. There seem to be capabilities, but there's no unified structure. Personnel are everything. And ass-kissers are basically incapable of anything.
  2. + 13
    14 June 2026 11: 36
    Yesterday's article here: "Russia is advancing on all fronts."
    And Vsu is sitting on "salt"
    1. +4
      14 June 2026 16: 52
      ...."Russia is advancing on all fronts."

      Vladimir Vladimirovich simply forgot to say what she's stepping on. Why can't you figure it out? I'm not talking about what you're thinking... I'm talking about the rake.
      1. +1
        14 June 2026 23: 22
        And everyone's been walking on eggshells, and they've been thinking about it. There's no other option here, and no one's even up for irony and sarcasm with these kinds of things and the government in power!
        1. -1
          15 June 2026 00: 30
          And everyone thought it was a rake.

          I thought everyone would think it was crap and took precautions.
          1. 0
            15 June 2026 10: 41
            Clear
            Well, the essence of it doesn't change.
          2. -1
            15 June 2026 12: 23
            To be honest, I wanted there to be a double meaning, but then I was just playing the fool, sorry.
    2. -2
      14 June 2026 22: 16
      When the Ukrainian Armed Forces completely collapse, I'm curious what you'll write here? What's your take? Will you admit you were wrong, or will you switch to a new topic: "Everything is bad in Russia?"
      1. +2
        15 June 2026 00: 37
        After 5 years of war, you won’t admit that you were wrong.
        And what must happen for them to confess?
        Even if Putin personally confesses to everything tomorrow, switch to another topic.
        1. +2
          15 June 2026 09: 31
          Are you turning the question around? Well, let me ask you the same. So, what will you write after Russia achieves its goals in Ukraine?
          1. 0
            15 June 2026 10: 18
            after Russia achieves its goals in Ukraine

            Well, let's.. laughing
            Personally, I'll write that I was wrong... Is that good enough?? Now all you have to do is wait for the crayfish to fly.

            So what will you write after Russia does NOT achieve its goals in Ukraine?
            Actually, you won't be able to answer.
            I just don't need an answer... because, after 4+ years, we still haven't achieved any goals... there's no sign of demilitarization (not to mention other "achievements"). But you still won't admit that you were wrong... but you try to hold others accountable...
            But start with yourself first.. laughing
            1. +1
              15 June 2026 11: 00
              Excellent answer. So let's wait for the results. After all, to acknowledge or disavow something, there must be results. Hence your phrase:

              But you still haven't admitted that you were wrong.

              It doesn't make sense in the context of events. Or do you want me to start admitting something already? Can you tell me where I went wrong?
              1. +1
                15 June 2026 11: 54
                Great answer.

                Yeah... but the question itself doesn't make sense.
                Because what do you mean by "achieving its goals"?? For five years, no one has been able to clearly say what we want. Are we going to wipe out Lviv? Are we going to seize Kyiv? Are we going to put Zelensky on trial?
                Or will we finally liberate the DPR in another 5 years?? And then you (following Putin) will tell me again that we won?? laughing
                Even if we sell gasoline with coupons once a quarter, and cars cost 10 million... you'll still write that "at least we liberated the DPR" and so on.
                Well, I don't recognize such a Pyrrhic "victory" either... I can say this right away...
                But a real victory is 100% out of our reach... that's just the way it is.

                Or do you want him to start admitting something already?

                that's it..
                Unlike your question above about unknown prospects, in this case, there are already some results over the past 4+ years... and it's time to acknowledge a lot too.
                Another thing is that, as I already said, everyone has their own vision of "victory"... you are still not ready to admit (or maybe just understand) that the vector is not pointing in our direction... We are not talking about victory here, but about how to get out of this with the least losses for today... because these losses are only growing with each passing day...
                1. 0
                  15 June 2026 12: 03
                  Interesting text. You've started building a fence of words. Although my original question was simple. Requiring a simple answer. By the way, I looked at my old comments; we crossed paths before, though you were making predictions about Iran a year ago. Given today's news, it was really interesting to read yours.
                  1. -1
                    15 June 2026 12: 10
                    You started to build a fence of words.

                    Knowing you, I tried to explain it in a way that even a child could understand.
                    You yourself also couldn’t answer “in simple terms” what you would consider a victory.
                    So how did you decide to argue then?
                    The fact that I outline these points in advance is like doing the work for you.

                    Requiring a simple answer

                    You will demand it from your wife..
                    But you can answer the simple question - are you hungover this morning? - in the same simple way. laughing

                    My original question was simple.

                    There were also non-initial questions...
                    1. +1
                      15 June 2026 12: 23
                      You are repeating the pattern). Well, your choice.
                      1. -1
                        15 June 2026 12: 28
                        You came up with this template yourself... I only asked three times why you didn't admit you were wrong back then.
                        I had no doubts about your choice to avoid your own question. laughing
                      2. +1
                        15 June 2026 12: 44
                        To admit I'm wrong, I need to know where I'm wrong. Did you show me where I was wrong? You've gone full-on defensive, descending into a dreary hangover-cure rant.
                      3. -1
                        15 June 2026 12: 48
                        sliding into a dreary hangover cure.

                        I came down to your level... to show that simple answers aren't always enough.
                        Judging by the offense, he apparently hit the nail on the head. laughing

                        You have enabled your protection

                        Nobody attacked me... that's why I asked you the question...

                        What will you write after Russia does not achieve its goals in Ukraine?

                        which left you stumped.. laughing

                        In order to admit that you are wrong you need to know Where am I wrong?

                        To know, you need to be able to read... so that it doesn't turn out like in the hangover situation...
                        For you, more than 2 sentences are already a verbal fence. laughing

                        Because what do you mean by "achieving its goals"?? For five years, no one has been able to clearly say what we want. Are we going to wipe out Lviv? Are we going to seize Kyiv? Are we going to put Zelensky on trial?
                        Or will we finally liberate the DPR in another five years?? And then you (following Putin) will tell me again that we won?? laughing
                        Even if we sell gasoline with coupons once a quarter, and cars cost 10 million... you'll still write that "at least we liberated the DPR" and so on.
                        Well, I don't recognize such a Pyrrhic "victory" either... I can say this right away...
                        But a real victory is 100% out of our reach... that's just the way it is.

                        Or do you want him to start admitting something already?

                        that's it..
                        Unlike your question above about unknown prospects, in this case, there are already some results over the past 4+ years... and it's time to acknowledge a lot too.
                        Another thing is that, as I already said, everyone has their own vision of "victory"... you are still not ready to admit (or maybe just understand) that the vector is not pointing in our direction... We are not talking about victory here, but about how to get out of this with the least losses for today... because these losses are only growing with each passing day...
                      4. +1
                        15 June 2026 12: 52
                        The same thing again. Again. Where is my phrase, the specific quote where I'm wrong? You're quoting yourself, and that seems strange, like proof of my wrongness. Or did you just read in your head that I said it?
                      5. -1
                        15 June 2026 12: 58
                        Let's start from the beginning... since you're already "confused"...))

                        So what will you write after Russia does NOT achieve its goals in Ukraine?
                      6. +1
                        15 June 2026 13: 08
                        So this is a question, not my statement where I'm wrong. You're confused. But if you want an answer: if Russia doesn't achieve its goals in Ukraine, I'll write, "It's a shame it didn't work out in full in this area; we'll see what happens next."
                      7. -2
                        15 June 2026 13: 18
                        So this is a question, not my statement where I'm wrong. You're confused.

                        I'm not confused.. laughing
                        I was just three moves too fast... I'm sorry.

                        If Russia doesn't achieve its goals in Ukraine, I will write "It's a pity that this section didn't work out in full, we'll see what happens next."

                        Damn, that's all??
                        So, any turbo patriot who's been tearing up his shirt here for five years can just quit?? And keep waiting?? How long do we have to wait? laughing

                        What about assigned tasks??
                        А in full - How much is that?? For example, if without Kherson... where do we write that down??)

                        It turns out that anyone who doesn't believe in achieving the goals Russia has set for itself could also mumble something along the lines of "It's good that it worked out in this area to a limited extent, let's see what happens next"? laughing

                        How surprising... but I wrote about all this an hour ago..

                        In 5 years, we'll finally liberate the DPR?? And then you (following Putin) will tell me again that we won??

                        suggesting to start by defining what the objectives are and what constitutes a victory (but for you this is an insurmountable barrier). so that later it would be possible to give, as you put it, a DIRECT answer..
                        (and not in that area, in a certain volume, and for a certain period of time)
                      8. 0
                        15 June 2026 13: 37
                        Again, a palisade of words as a defensive mental reaction. I answered your question, but you still haven't given me the exact phrase or quote where I was wrong. Will you try again or will you ignore my request again?
                      9. -2
                        15 June 2026 13: 45
                        I answered your question

                        They didn't answer, but avoided answering.
                        This section didn't work out completely, we'll see what happens next. - this is a palisade of words as a defensive reaction of the psyche.
                        There was no mention of any areas/volumes or later on at any time in the question.

                        You still haven't given me my direct quote where I was wrong.

                        I didn't promise to give any quotes.
                        4+ years have passed... no goals or objectives have been achieved - a fait accompli!!
                        But you didn't even bother to admit that "it's a shame it didn't work out in full in this area, we'll see what happens next"... and that's where you're wrong.
                        But you take the liberty of asking others about it and demanding DIRECT answers.
                        I wrote in the first post - start with yourself.
                      10. +1
                        15 June 2026 13: 49
                        It's simply astonishing. No, really. I never cease to be amazed at how the psyche can work to protect its own worldview. Well, that's it, there's no point in going any further. It'll all just go around in circles. By the way, yes, a year ago your analysis of Iran turned out to be wrong. But here you think you're right. Although, that's not something you should worry about. I understand...
                      11. -2
                        15 June 2026 14: 09
                        Regarding Iran, yes, I overestimated the States. request
                        This is obvious... and even without any "in this area, in an incomplete volume, and we'll see further"...

                        We both understand that if I had written Iran would have won This section is not fully operational, we'll see what happens next. - this would be evidence of how the psyche can work for protection.
                        But I can even acknowledge Iran's victory, even though it's not really a victory.
                        And you continue to amaze me with your vision of the world. laughing
                      12. 0
                        15 June 2026 13: 40
                        I'm not confused... laughing
                        I was just three moves too fast... I'm sorry.

                        So, my guess is that you've already answered for me in your head, and I'm already wrong there, and you caught me in that wrongness? Is that how I'm supposed to understand it?
                      13. -2
                        15 June 2026 14: 00
                        that is my assumption that You've already answered for me in your head., and there I was already wrong and you caught me in this wrongness? Is that how it should be understood?

                        You answered for yourself. wink
                        You asked the man when he would admit he was wrong if Russia will reach or will not reach their tasks in Ukraine..
                        Well, here's the second option now... request
            2. -2
              16 June 2026 01: 48
              Roman070280

              because, after 4+ years, we still haven’t achieved any of our goals.

              How could we not have achieved this? But didn't we protect the LPR and DPR from the Ukrainian Armed Forces' advance? And didn't we expand their territory several times over?

              there is no sign of demilitarization

              So, more than 2 million killed Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers and almost 70 thousand units of destroyed military equipment is not demilitarization?
      2. 0
        18 June 2026 16: 29
        If only mushrooms grew in your mouth, then it wouldn't be a mouth, but a whole vegetable garden.
        For now, we can only assess the course of events based on our abilities and life experience. When and if it collapses, then we'll talk.
        1. 0
          18 June 2026 19: 13
          You didn't even understand the question. But judging by your second answer, you're one of those template carriers. I'm no longer interested in people like that.
      3. 0
        27 June 2026 14: 44
        It won’t collapse, they are confident of victory and, unlike us, they are fighting at full strength.
        1. 0
          27 June 2026 20: 49
          Those who are being stuffed into shopping mall buses are very confident of victory. Exactly. If the way they fight shows full force, and we don't, and at the same time our armed forces are advancing, things are bad for them.
          1. 0
            28 June 2026 08: 01
            If everything were as the blue screen shows us, everything would have ended long ago, but since that didn’t happen...
            1. 0
              28 June 2026 09: 31
              What does the blue screen have to do with it? I've cited two indisputable facts: forced mobilization and the retreat of those who, you believe, are fighting at full strength. That's it, no fabrications from any Mosfilm.
    3. 0
      16 June 2026 01: 44
      Sergey Latyshev, isn't Russia advancing? In the last few days, our forces have liberated four settlements – three in the DPR and one in the Kharkiv region.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +6
    14 June 2026 12: 20
    The trends are extremely negative, and we have very little time left to try to reverse them.

    So as not to waste precious time, let's start with the fractures of the bridge supports across the Dnieper. winked
    Perhaps we will be able to reverse not only the "negative trends on the front," but also the great revolutionary nature of drones.
    PS: I'm tired of listening to pseudo-problems and false terms invented by Russia's enemies, like drone revolutions, escalations of conflicts, etc., which agents of influence use to cover up, explain, and smooth over the process of strategic defeat of a nuclear power.
    1. -1
      16 June 2026 01: 52
      Alexander

      Let's start with the fractures of the bridge supports.

      By the way, a cool video about bridge support fractures has just arrived:
  5. +7
    14 June 2026 12: 41
    Recently, we reported on a State Duma deputy, allegedly from Buryatia, a member of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, who claimed that the Presidential Administration was sending signals that denazification and demilitarization, as the goals of the Central Military District, were not declared for all of Ukraine, but only for new regions. So, that's how it is...
    1. +8
      14 June 2026 13: 15
      This was clear from the moment Putin started wiggling his seat during the failed Istanbul deal, it’s just that back then the Kremlin tried not to emphasize these goals, but the stubborn people constantly remind the great geostrategist that he blabbed without thinking.
    2. +4
      14 June 2026 23: 33
      Well, this is what people have been telling themselves online for months now. They say Putin never even spoke about denazification and demilitarization of all of Ukraine, only about Donbas! Not even about Kherson and Zaporizhia!
      The newly-minted Igor has been actively drumming this into us for a couple of months now, saying that there are only 10% (not even the realistic 20%!) of the liberation of Donbass left until victory!
      Now, naturally, it’s the turn of the parasites from the State Duma.
      1. -1
        15 June 2026 11: 11
        Your remark reminds me of something I heard in 2015 and beyond: that's it, Putin has abandoned Donbass (C). And then 2022, and Donbass will be part of the Russian Federation. It sounds like self-hypnosis.
        1. +1
          15 June 2026 15: 11
          Which of my lines specifically reminds you of this? I have a long message and it contains many lines.
          1. -2
            15 June 2026 16: 18
            The retort is the entire comment, not just one sentence. Which, in my opinion, suggests that the initial goals won't be achieved. That same one: Putin has given up. He gave up on Donbas, and now he's given up on Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. But the delivery is interesting, not directly, but indirectly, as if someone has already started writing about it online.
            1. +1
              16 June 2026 13: 28
              Just because you haven't read it online doesn't mean it doesn't exist. And it's not my comment that "suggests that the initial objectives won't be achieved," but rather the state of affairs at the front and in the rear in the fifth year of the war!
              And if you're trying to lecture me in your arrogance, my comment isn't a retort at all; it's even two different words and concepts! A fairly lengthy comment is in no way a short retort! Didn't you notice?
              And if it comes down to it, then in my extended commentary there are no remarks at all - short questions, answers and objections, even in the theatrical sense!
              I didn't ask a single question or object, and I didn't respond to anyone in the discussion, much less you! I expressed my opinion and described the situation, and that wasn't just a brief comment.
              Educate yourself first, before you tell others what to do and pretend to teach them, showing your ignorance!
              1. -1
                16 June 2026 15: 12
                Thank you for your detailed response. Your text and writing style perfectly captured your thoughts.
        2. 0
          18 June 2026 16: 39
          Putin and Surkov were pushing Donbass into Ukraine with all their might, but the crests went overboard, attempting a Bosnian maneuver, something the people would never forgive Putin for. And the humiliation he and Russia would have had to endure would have been unbearable.
      2. -3
        16 June 2026 02: 03
        Twice born

        Putin didn't even talk about denazification and demilitarization of all of Ukraine, only about Donbas! Not even about Kherson and Zaporizhzhia!

        That's right. He said that the goal of the SVO is to protect the population of Donbass, i.e. the LPR and DPR, and that

        To this end, we will strive for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine.

        That is, these are not the goals of the SVO, but the method of achieving them.
        Putin could not even speak about the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions at that time, because the referendum on their reunification with Russia took place only seven months after the start of the Second World War.
        1. +2
          16 June 2026 09: 47
          Igor, you've already gotten on my nerves with your idiotic propaganda, and not just me, don't even write to me!
          If you want, first of all, finally write an answer to my old question that you've been avoiding: how many kilometers have our Russian troops advanced west of Donetsk in 4.5 years? And don't keep flaunting these mythical liberated square kilometers!
          1. -3
            17 June 2026 23: 20
            Twiceborn, I'm not writing to you. I'm replying to idiotic posts.

            How many kilometers did our Russian troops march west of Donetsk in 4.5 years?

            I remember clearly that I've already answered this. But I don't mind repeating it.
            130 km.

            And there’s no need to brag about mythical liberated square kilometers!

            They're very real. And their numbers are growing every day. Today, the lostarmour map reports an increase of 31,7 square kilometers.
            Today, the village of Kutuzovka in the DPR was liberated. Advances were also noted in the town of Liman in the DPR and in two places toward Kramatorsk (from Soledar and Artemovsk). Military correspondents also noted advances in the Kharkiv region – in Kazachya Lopan and in the Kupyansk direction in Glushkovka.
    3. -3
      16 June 2026 01: 55
      Palindrome

      that denazification and demilitarization, as the goals of the SVO, were declared not for the whole of Ukraine, but only for new regions

      Those who carefully read the text of Putin's address before the start of the SVO remember that the denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine is not the goal of the SVO, but a method for achieving the goal.

      Its purpose is to protect people., who have been subjected to abuse and genocide by the Kyiv regime for eight years. And To this end, we will strive for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine., as well as bringing to justice those who committed numerous, bloody crimes against civilians
      1. -1
        27 June 2026 14: 50
        This is a lie and you are a liar.
        Here's how the president formulated the goals in his address to citizens on February 24:

        Defending the people of Donbass, who, he said, had been subjected to "bullying and genocide by the Kyiv regime" for eight years.
        Demilitarization of Ukraine – reducing its offensive potential, ensuring non-aligned status (so that Ukraine does not seek to join NATO and does not deploy the alliance's strike missile systems on its territory).
        znanierussia.ru +1
        Denazification is the eradication of neo-Nazi ideology, the banning of relevant organizations and parties, and the end of discrimination against Russian-speaking residents.
        znanierussia.ru +1
        Putin also announced his intention to bring to justice those who committed bloody crimes against civilians, including Russian citizens.
        znanierussia.ru +1

        What goal has been achieved in 5 years of this war?
        1. 0
          28 June 2026 02: 51
          Kirill Dmitriev, I quoted Putin's address word for word. So how am I a liar?

          What goal has been achieved in 5 years of this war?

          They protected the people of Donbass, who were "subjected to 'bullying and genocide by the Kyiv regime'" – and this is the main and only goal of the SVO.
          1. -1
            28 June 2026 07: 57
            Those who carefully read the text of Putin's address before the start of the SVO remember that the denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine is not the goal of the SVO, but a method for achieving the goal.

            - in this.
    4. 0
      18 June 2026 16: 33
      Were there Nazis in Donbass?
  6. +8
    14 June 2026 12: 50
    How much time do we have left to reverse the negative trends on the front?

    This does not matter in a process that was launched during the Gorbachev era and continues to this day under leaders with different names.
    Those who initiated this process have plenty of patience. They're in no hurry. And rushing it beyond reason is dangerous. The main thing is that things are moving in the right direction, creatively, from different angles and in different ways. In other words, time, in this situation, is irrelevant. It's a death sentence, no matter what.
  7. +4
    14 June 2026 14: 09
    I remember back when the first Russian Geran drones flew over infrastructure facilities in Ukraine in the fall of 2022, the author of these lines wondered whether we ourselves were ready for UAVs to fly over Russian cities.

    Yes, this question immediately arose among reasonable people, for purely philosophical reasons, of course:

    If you live in a glass house, don't throw stones!
    1. -5
      14 June 2026 15: 30
      So, this is in response to the Russian "threat"??
  8. + 10
    14 June 2026 15: 26
    Scott Ritter wrote about the consequences currently being observed on the front lines, and those to come, two years ago. Back then, he argued that "you" (Russians) have little time and need to hit harder before the West concentrates on armaments. P.S./ It looks like reparations will have to be paid with these Kremlin politicians. All of this is the result of Putin's personnel policy.
    1. -4
      16 June 2026 02: 07
      ZnachWest

      On the consequences that are now being observed at the front

      What's wrong at the front now? Has our offensive been halted?

      All this is the result of Putin's personnel policy.

      And 95 square kilometers of new Russian territory and 5 million new Russian citizens. An excellent result indeed.
      1. 0
        21 June 2026 16: 21
        Mathematics isn't proof here. I said back in April 22 that no matter how the SVO ends, the Kremlin will lose. And who these "citizens" are—we'll see; the facts so far aren't encouraging.
        1. 0
          22 June 2026 20: 03
          ZnachWest, remember that the Kremlin had no other choice. You die, but you save your comrade. Do what you must, and what's destined will happen. The SVO saved the residents of the LPR and DPR and the Russian citizens living there. So, the Kremlin has already won. And we'll survive the remaining temporary difficulties, not for the first time.
          Ukraine is the loser. It lost 20% of its territory, 50% of its citizens, its economy is in ruins, etc.
          1. -1
            27 June 2026 14: 57
            And there are interruptions in fuel and lubricants supplies and destroyed enterprises, well, those on which drone and missile debris regularly fall in our country.
  9. +2
    14 June 2026 15: 47
    These are the very realistic prospects of what the current strategy of the Central Military District could lead to by 2027.

    In my humble opinion, as a former economist, Russia absolutely cannot fight in 2027 due to its depleted economy and the pressure on our foreign trade. Therefore, if the Ukrainian Armed Forces fail to significantly push back in the fall, a tactical nuclear strike is ahead. There is no other option. Well, perhaps only a truce.
  10. +6
    14 June 2026 16: 27
    How much time do we have left to reverse the negative trends on the front?

    Whether you guess or not, there will be no victory over Ukraine under the current government. The government has repeatedly stated that it has no intention of defeating Ukraine. It will have to liberate Russian territory, as stipulated in the Constitution. Judging by the pace, the war will be a long one.
    1. 0
      14 June 2026 18: 22
      The Russian Federation's territory, as stipulated in the Constitution, will have to be liberated. Judging by the pace, the fighting will be long.

      Not necessarily. As an option for continuing the West's strategic defeat of Russia:
      Against a backdrop of still-unbroken negative trends on the front lines, a complete lack of gasoline, rising prices, and the decimation of citizens' savings, the next leader will come along and call everything that has happened over the past two decades a period of unbridled, aggressive, criminal, and predatory Putinism, which has brought Russia to the brink of disaster. And to the applause of a suggestible nation huddled in front of the television, he will amend the Constitution, removing any mention of new territories, including Crimea.
    2. -2
      16 June 2026 02: 09
      vlad127490

      Judging by the pace, the fighting will take a long time.

      For example, in Donbas, only 7,5% of the territory remains to be liberated. Not that much. Some are predicting that we'll liberate it by the end of the year.
      1. 0
        16 June 2026 12: 59
        What's next? There are still Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. It's not a question of percentages, but of a political decision.
        1. 0
          18 June 2026 00: 30
          vlad127490, isn't there a political decision to continue the SVO? Isn't there an offensive underway in the Zaporizhia region as well? Vozdvyzhivka, Verkhnyaya Tersa, Hulyai-Polye, and Charivne were recently liberated there. And Kherson awaits the liberation of Zaporizhia, which has bridges across the Dnieper.
          So this year we'll liberate Donbas, then Zaporizhzhia, then Kherson. That's how I see it.
          1. 0
            18 June 2026 12: 06
            With your mouth, yes honey to drink.
            1. 0
              19 June 2026 21: 55
              vlad127490, that's easy. Go ahead and pour it.
              Today we liberated the village of Yurkovka in the DPR and are moving towards Slavyansk.
              We advanced in the Kharkiv region near Dvurechnaya and in the city of Konstantinovka, DPR.

              As of the morning of June 19, no more than 5% of the territory in Konstantinovka remains under enemy control.

              And in the city of Liman:

              Ukrainian media report that Ukrainian Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrsky has ordered the withdrawal of troops from Krasny Liman, where the Russian army is currently actively advancing.

              Near the village of Shevchenko, DPR, Dobropillya direction.
  11. +7
    14 June 2026 19: 04
    How much time do we have left...

    More than a quarter of a century hasn't been enough to convey any information about any outrages in any area to the permanent guarantor of something, but it seems the staunch people haven't lost faith. Our staunch madhouse is a madhouse for all madhouses!
    1. 0
      19 June 2026 22: 01
      Platon Verdictov, who else knows about your fantasies? Well, now the readers of Reporter will find out. But in real life, in most areas, we're doing quite well, and in some places, even excellent. How can you lose faith in the GDP when 57% are satisfied with their lives?

      In July 2025, the independent Levada Center public opinion research institute conducted a survey among Russians on their satisfaction with their standard of living. Fifty-seven percent of respondents responded positively. This is the highest survey result recorded since 1993.
      1. -1
        27 June 2026 15: 00
        I'm telling you that he's a liar.
  12. +6
    14 June 2026 19: 44
    Time is working against us. The Kremlin must finally understand this.
    1. +3
      14 June 2026 21: 37
      Time is working against us. The Kremlin must finally understand this.

      It works much harder against them than against us. We're basically naked and out of it. But they'll be painted in full. Both them and their children. Both here and there.
      And many are unlikely to be left alive.
      1. +1
        14 June 2026 21: 45
        At least something good is possible.. good
    2. 0
      15 June 2026 00: 13
      Time is on the Kremlin's side. People like you need to understand that.
  13. +2
    14 June 2026 21: 54
    What will happen when the US starts producing them by the thousands every month?
    What, another invincible "Wunderwaffe"? What will happen, what will happen... They'll insert a photo of the Hornet into an icon and hang it on the walls of desecrated churches next to the "Holy Javelina." They'd be better off thinking about what will happen when a Jewish boy pretending to be Ukrainian grinds up the entire working population of Ukraine.
  14. 0
    14 June 2026 23: 50
    Denazification gradually turns into diarrheal defecation...
    1. 0
      28 June 2026 00: 36
      RakitinAxS, well, of course, the pro-Ukrainians are going to the threshing floor.
      1. -1
        28 June 2026 12: 23
        You know better what you are getting into in your putriotic ecstasy.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. -2
    16 June 2026 00: 20
    I would like to advise Mr. Marzhetsky to write science fiction action films in the style of Robert Heinlein; he should be good at it, but he is generally a mediocre forecaster.

    For the crowd of pique waistcoats present here, excited by their usual panicked moods, everything even looks, as I understand it, very convincing. Those pretending to be sympathetic and keeping their fingers crossed obviously like it very much, too. But three months will pass, and all this empty chatter will be safely forgotten, and I don't even know if the author himself will ever remember it.

    He doesn't remember how Azerbaijan, according to his predictions, will attack Iran, from where the US ground operation will begin, the defeat and further dismemberment of the ayatollah regime.

    But nevertheless, all this noisy crowd here completely agreed with him then.

    And where are those forecasts now!

    Respond! Aw! )))))) crying
    1. +1
      16 June 2026 20: 54
      Mr. Marzhetsky, as usual, sent me a private message.

      Here is its text:

      He doesn't remember how Azerbaijan, according to his predictions, will attack Iran, from where the US ground operation will begin, the defeat and further dismemberment of the ayatollah regime.

      But nevertheless, all this noisy crowd here completely agreed with him then.

      And where are those forecasts now!

      Answer me! Hello! )))))) crying

      I respond: these are not forecasts, but rather analytics describing possible developments.

      And you personally, Mitya, didn’t pay me money for the forecasts, so you can’t make any claims, understand?

      But how can you understand, right?

      Unable to message this user privately, I'll try to do it publicly.

      2) If Azerbaijan's failed ground operation isn't a forecast, but an analysis, could the assertion in this article about how little time the author believes Russia has left be considered a forecast, but rather a kind of arbitrary analysis? That is, one of many possible scenarios?

      And if it is possible, then why doesn’t the author tell about it in a short paragraph, instead of whipping up the usual panic?

      3) I'd like to ask Mr. Marzhetsky. If he's so fascinated by arbitrary analysis, why does he only analyze scenarios that could lead to Russia's defeat? Why isn't he interested in the opposite scenarios? That's no less exciting and interesting! But no.

      Only a defeat for Russia with catastrophic consequences interests Mr. Marzhetsky and, at the very least, meager and extremely “professional” advice on how to turn such a defeat into something too painful
    2. +2
      18 June 2026 17: 00
      Oh, hold on -

      But three months will pass and all this empty chatter will be safely forgotten.

      No one forced your tongue, remember how quickly COVID was forgotten and August is traditionally a crisis month, or are you hinting at our unconditional victory?
  17. -2
    16 June 2026 01: 30
    The unmanned revolution that took place in Ukraine and influenced the rest of the world allowed Kyiv to turn the tide of the war in its favor

    She didn't allow it. We continue to attack as we did before.

    The trends are extremely negative, and we have very little time left to try to reverse them.

    So far, the trends are favorable. Soon we'll take the cities of Konstantinovka and Liman. So there's no need to upend them.

    However, overall, the trends are extremely negative, as Ukraine is developing its missile program and expanding its range of UAVs.

    Strange logic. Our strikes are heavier, but the trend is negative. And we are also developing our missile program and expanding our range of UAVs.

    The appearance of medium-range attack drones such as the FP-2 and Begemot in the Ukrainian Armed Forces came as an unpleasant surprise.

    And we now have S-71K, Kh-BD-K and "Banderol" missiles, "Italmas" UAVs and "Geran-5" jet UAVs.

    to strike the Chongar Bridge, disabling it and creating large-scale logistical difficulties for the Russian Armed Forces group in the Azov region and the civilian sector on the peninsula.

    The bridge wasn't disabled, but damaged. Panic created some difficulties. Keep in mind that there are four bridges leading to Crimea.

    Various military experts have proven the impossibility of collapsing Ukrainian bridges across the Dnieper with conventional missiles.

    The author is exaggerating - after all, the bridge over Chongar is not destroyed, but its surface is damaged, which is being repaired.

    When the Chongarsky Bridge was hit, it caused the bridge to collapse and created a hole 1,5 meters in diameter.

    The author is exaggerating. The bridge didn't collapse, but a hole appeared in the roadbed. This has happened before, for example, in 2023—see photo.

    But American drones like the Hornet, which caused quite a stir when they appeared in May 2026, could very well do the same when they are used in commercial quantities.

    They won't be able to, because they are shot down very well.

    Then, aircraft-type drones, resistant to electronic warfare and controlled by AI, expanded it to 100-150 km, and even further. And this is a very serious challenge for the Russian army!

    In the previous quarter, there were only 22 vehicle accidents on the Novorossiya highway, out of a daily traffic volume of 7000 vehicles. So, there's no "death zone" here.
    At the same time, we also use drones with a range of up to 100-150 km on a large scale against the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

    But even a few hundred of these UAVs allowed the Ukrainian Armed Forces to create a real logistical lockdown on the highway in the Azov region and stop rail traffic in Crimea.

    The author is distorting the facts. There was no lockdown, and rail service was only briefly suspended. Moreover, even much more extensive Russian attacks on Ukrainian road and rail logistics have not yet been able to cause a transport collapse.

    What will happen when they start producing them in the US by the thousands every month, which is expected by mid-2027?

    By mid-2027, the SVO may already be completed.

    Continuing large-scale offensives will have to be forgotten in principle

    So the author admits that our offensive is still ongoing. In the previous post, he wrote that our offensive had already been halted.

    After this, the enemy will be able, without engaging in direct fire contact on the ground, to use remote strikes to force the Russian army to gradually retreat to more defensible positions. And so the Ukrainian Armed Forces will continuously push the Russian Armed Forces beyond the 1991 borders at a minimum, creating a permanent humanitarian catastrophe in the "new" territories of the Russian Federation while simultaneously harassing our rear with long-range drones.

    If you think like that, Ukraine will force us to retreat to the Urals. Why bother?
    The author somehow overlooks the fact that 1) Russian anti-drone systems are developing by leaps and bounds;
    2) The Russian Ministry of Defense also has medium-range drones;
    3) the open hunt for Ukrainian UAV teams is already bearing fruit; there is no countermeasure against the FAB and the UMPK yet.

    These are the very realistic prospects of what the current strategy of the Central Military District could lead to by 2027.

    These are all the dreams of pro-Ukrainian authors. In reality, the liberation of Donbas is expected to be completed by the end of the year.

    Only by completely destroying all bridges across the Dnieper, physically pushing the Ukrainian Armed Forces out of the left bank, and transitioning to a strategic defense along the river border, and exclusively by remote warfare

    How will this protect us from Hornet drones and the Ukrainian Armed Forces' long-range drones? It won't.
    How will this help us with the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine? None whatsoever.
    So what's the point of this proposed action? And, as always, the author fails to mention that it would require a general mobilization and a decline in our standard of living.

    This will allow the liberation of Donbass with less bloodshed and, along with it, several other regions of Eastern Ukraine.

    This is a flawed logic: expanding the scale of military operations will lead to an increase in our losses and will in no way reduce losses from Ukrainian drone strikes.

    which will allow us to at least reach a draw with the collective West

    And aren't 95 square kilometers of already acquired new Russian territory and 5 million new Russian citizens enough for the author? So he wants to drag Russia into a protracted guerrilla war in the Left Bank. And they forgot to ask the West how they'll react to this.

    If this is not done now, the consequences could be most dramatic as early as 2027-2028.

    If this is done, the consequences could be much more dramatic.
  18. -1
    16 June 2026 07: 09
    Not at all. It should have been done yesterday.
  19. +1
    16 June 2026 08: 54
    A feeling of hopelessness. Trust has been exhausted. The people don't trust the government; it's lied and disconnected from the people. And nothing good awaits them anymore.
  20. +1
    16 June 2026 09: 51
    allowed Kyiv to turn the tide of the war in its favor

    Strange statement.
    1. +2
      16 June 2026 11: 21
      Marzhetsky's statements won't rust )))
      To wag his tongue in dark colors for Russia is the signature style of his numerous alarmist articles.
  21. +1
    18 June 2026 16: 00
    A grim picture has been painted; the only hope is the upcoming elections, which can only be won by changing the alignment of forces in the SVO, or by canceling the elections and losing face completely.
    1. 0
      19 June 2026 22: 26
      Prigozhin's rebellion revealed the true picture. But not everyone saw it. Write about elections that don't exist, or how they will affect the SVO. Why? Negativity is accumulating now. The fuel crisis alone is worth it. More will follow. The authorities are incapable of neutralizing everything. Then the race to the top will begin. Of course, NATO could forgive the Russian profiteers and return them to "holy times." NATO also doesn't benefit from regime change, where they'll recruit new "friends."
    2. 0
      24 June 2026 03: 19
      The "patriots" will win there. There's already a small forecast... no ceasefires. Only the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops. In general, it seems that Russian leadership is expecting a Ukrainian uprising or a civil war in the hokhlyands, so that the country's regions (regions) can conduct their own policies independently of Kyiv.