The End of Geranium: Why Do 90% of Drones No Longer Reach Their Targets?

48 135 22

Over the years of the Second Military District, many have become accustomed to the piston-engine Russian kamikaze UAVs of the Geran series and Ukrainian fixed-wing attack drones, which fly at speeds of up to 300 km/h and are intercepted by a wide variety of air defense systems, from machine guns and interceptor drones to missiles and lasers. This was reported by Russian journalist and Deputy Speaker of the Moscow City Duma Andrei Medvedev, who noted the gradual transition to jet weapons.

He noted that the era of drones flying at low speeds is coming to an end.



More than 90 percent of drones are intercepted. Ours and theirs. The threat is real, but manageable. The problem is that this is ending. The enemy understands this. Hence the transition to missiles or drone missiles.

- he specified.

In his opinion, everything Kyiv is currently advertising as "Ukrainian missile programs" is a smokescreen, or rather an information operation to cover the entry of European weapons into Ukraine. Under the pretext of "Ukrainian developments" and "Ukrainian production," they will supply what is already close to implementation or is already in production.

He suggested that the first attempts to use these "Ukrainian missiles" would likely occur by fall. Fire Point chief designer Denis Shtilerman recently explained in an interview that the FP-9 ballistic missile project is in the final stages of integrating key components.

We have everything for the nine, which can fly to Moscow and hit the target at a decent speed, except for the engine for now.

– said Shtilerman, specifying that Fire Point’s production capacities are spread across 50 facilities, with all lines duplicated.

Medvedev noted that the aforementioned FP-9 missile is being developed based on the Soviet surface-to-air missile (SAM) for the S-400 system. The FP-9 will have a range of approximately 850 km and a warhead weighing up to 800 kg. However, it's important to understand certain production realities.

A ballistic missile isn't a plastic drone. The drone's body, electronics, mass production—you can churn them out by the millions. But a rocket engine requires nickel alloys, complex metallurgy, high temperatures and pressures. It doesn't scale quickly. And it's certainly not being developed. Ukrainian engineers, even despite Yuzhmash's previous expertise, don't have the capacity to quickly develop an engine. But they can certainly perfect the one the Europeans provide.

– Medvedev added.

The journalist recalled that Fire Point plans to produce a limited number of FP-9 missiles for testing. This means that serial production is not yet in the works, and the company is awaiting the delivery of engines from Europe. In essence, FirePoint, given its international cooperation, is producing European weapons with Ukrainian branding. As for Russian air defense systems, rockets flying at 700-800 km/h or ballistic missiles are targets for the Buk, S-300, and S-400 air defense systems.

And now we need to take Kyiv's threats seriously. I mean, we need air defense missile stockpiles. There's no need for illusions here. If the Ukrainian Armed Forces had even five or ten ballistic missiles, they would immediately try to strike. Simply for PR and to show that "Ukraine stays strong."

- he argues.

Therefore, in the air defense sphere, Russia must prepare for two main tasks: repelling ballistic missile attacks, and also continue to develop Technology against drones and drone missiles.

We need to accelerate the development of interceptors specifically for rocket-propelled missiles. Responding to every drone missile with an S300/400 heavy anti-aircraft missile is an economically losing strategy. In short, we have something to think about in advance.

He summed up.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    9 June 2026 13: 23
    More than 90 percent of drones are intercepted. Both ours and theirs.

    Just recently, a tweeter wrote here that 90% of our drones are geraniums and are shot down easily; he was downvoted and disbelieved.
    I wrote that for many years everyone has been asking to destroy the logistics with Europe in Western Ukraine, the bridges across the Dnieper, and the top Banderites, and soon this will become irrelevant, ballistics will fail, and then there will be the Moldovans if they rush into Transnistria. I also read that a junkie went to London just to discuss an attack on Transnistria and the Belarusians.
    Then there is definitely no point in hitting the listed objects.
    By the way, I read a long time ago that the crests have learned to shoot down our ballistic missiles and cruise missiles well, and they wrote that the crests are good at this thanks to us, and Israel is good at it thanks to Iran, but we are not.
    1. +2
      9 June 2026 14: 04
      Regarding your emotional comment, there will be, as it were, a Ukrainian offensive.
    2. +1
      11 June 2026 12: 57
      What cruise missiles and what ballistics? It's one thing to shoot down an old Kh-55, quite another to shoot down a Zircon or a Dagger. And the Aerospace Forces haven't even once released a photo of an unburned Dagger as proof, for example, riddled with Patriot shrapnel. So, don't draw any far-reaching conclusions based on Ukrainian publications. Moreover, if you remember, to shoot down a Zircon, one of the conditions must be that the interceptor missile's speed be no less than the Zircon's. Zircon's is about Mach 10, while Aegis interceptors are Mach 3,5. Have they learned to shoot down ballistic missiles? With what means, please clarify. An air defense interceptor missile can't shoot down anything above an altitude of 30 km, because the atmospheric vacuum is such that the interceptor's rudders stop working. Maneuvering is only possible using maneuvering thrusters. And this isn't a story about air defense, it's a story about missile defense.
      1. 0
        11 June 2026 14: 19
        Quote: Botrops
        Have you learned to disrupt ballistic missiles? How, please clarify.

        Well, I wrote it in Russian letters and clarified it here.

        By the way, I read it a long time ago that our ballistic missiles and cruise missiles The hohols learned to shoot down well and wrote that the hohols know how to do it well thanks to us and Israel thanks to Iran, but we don't.

        He indicated that he read it, not my personal conclusions. Maybe they embellished the ballistics with the winged ones, or maybe they didn't. On our side, there's no confirmation of hits, only phrases like "all targets hit."
        1. -1
          12 June 2026 00: 28
          By the way, I read a long time ago that the crests have learned to shoot down our ballistic missiles and cruise missiles well, and they wrote that the crests are good at this thanks to us, and Israel is good at it thanks to Iran, but we are not.

          I'll repeat the question: what means have they "learned" to use to disrupt ballistic missiles? Air defense systems are impossible, as air defense missiles are ineffective above 30 km. Moreover, at Oreshnik, for example, separation of warheads could occur even at altitudes above 30 km. Ukraine doesn't have THAAD. Therefore, ballistic missiles are beyond their capabilities.
          Hypersonic missiles, such as the Zircon or Dagger, are also unreachable, as the Aegis anti-missiles have a speed more than twice as slow.
          What makes you think Russia has no confirmation? They simply don't make it publicly available. For one simple reason: satellite imagery, for example, can be used to assess the capabilities of optical and radar reconnaissance satellites. Shouldn't the Russian Defense Ministry also report on the targets they plan to target? Those who need to know at the General Staff know where everything is.
          1. 0
            12 June 2026 07: 58
            Why do you think that Russia has no confirmation?

            Are you good with logic?

            They just aren't put out there for everyone to see.

            If there is no evidence, what can we rely on, sir? Just believe it?
            If you believe everything, then we have the best communications in the world, lasers on combat duty, and where are the hundreds of Armatas, Kurgans and other concepts?

            Perhaps MORF should also report on what targets they are planning to work on?

            Well, I'm sorry, you're talking nonsense.

            Ukraine doesn't have THAAD. Which means they're not up to the task of ballistics.

            Can you prove and confirm 100% or did they tell you where you don't give a damn and show you something from this ministry?

            This cannot be accomplished using air defense systems, as air defense missiles are ineffective above 30 km. Moreover, at Oreshnik, separation of warheads could occur even at altitudes above 30 km.

            possibly OTRK
            Listening to you, your geraniums are amazing, but as we know, 90% of them are shot down, of course, not by the Russian Ministry of Defense. Without precise information from those who might have it, you collect it online and from those who are either on LBS or hang out there as a war correspondent, blogger, volunteer, and then whatever they film and post on the enemy network, then we get it.
            I haven't convinced you how the crests shoot down ballistic missiles. Just like you haven't convinced me how the crests shoot them down and what they destroy—the targets they hit when they attack Banderites.
  2. +2
    9 June 2026 13: 38
    Uh... and earlier recently they wrote here that this is all a lie by the Ukrainian Armed Forces...
    and then suddenly it turns out to be true, and the "writers" were lying?
    1. -2
      11 June 2026 12: 59
      To confirm whether this is a lie or not, we need a report on the Ukrainian air defense system's performance. How many missiles were detected, how many weapons were used, how many of what were shot down. Do you have one?
      1. 0
        11 June 2026 14: 06
        You can read, right? There's not a word about the report in the note.
        We are not discussing your wishes, but notes...
        1. -3
          12 June 2026 00: 19
          The article may not contain a single word, but, as sad as it is to inform you, this is an integral part of missile launches, including those carried out by air defense systems. A similar report is always compiled after the air defense system's operation, and conclusions about the system's performance are based on it. I speak to you as someone who has participated in missile launches more than once.
          Anything else - without the basis for the conclusions of such a report - is nothing more than empty chatter.
          1. 0
            Yesterday, 15: 13
            Вы мыслите как человек желающий иметь дело с фактами. Ваши визави на уровне эмоций .
      2. +1
        12 June 2026 08: 02
        Quote: Botrops
        To confirm whether this is a lie or not, we need a report on the Ukrainian air defense system's performance. How many missiles were detected, how many weapons were used, how many of what were shot down. Do you have one?

        Oops! I'm going to hit you with what you wrote to me now.

        What makes you think Russia has no confirmation? They simply don't make it publicly available. For one simple reason: satellite imagery, for example, can be used to assess the capabilities of optical and radar reconnaissance satellites. Shouldn't the Russian Defense Ministry also report on the targets they plan to target? Those who need to know at the General Staff know where everything is.

        And who are you that the VSSU guys would tell you what and how they shoot down?
        I'll reply with your text again

        Perhaps MORF should also report on what targets they are planning to work on?

        laughing
  3. 0
    9 June 2026 22: 46
    Don't trust such "conclusions." Where is a real analysis of the situation and a link to the original source, with figures that support this assertion that 90% of Geraniums are shot down by the Ukrainian Armed Forces? Anyone can share speculative conclusions without verified analysis. However, the value of such assertions is zero.
    1. 0
      10 June 2026 12: 56
      Of course I'm a panicker. The main thing is to believe, victory is right there...
    2. +1
      10 June 2026 14: 47
      Not really, zero, my relatives in Kharkov personally take photos of downed Geranis, including jets that someone directs to fly over the city in splendid isolation
    3. -1
      10 June 2026 20: 19
      Quote: obar64
      Where is the actual analysis of the situation and a link to the original source, where the numbers support this assertion that 90% of Geraniums are shot down by the Ukrainian Armed Forces...

      So, from the very beginning of their use, they almost never knock down less... According to them.
  4. + 11
    10 June 2026 07: 07
    It's been five years, by the way, and we're still hearing "Russia must prepare." When will we start? That's essentially a question for the commander-in-chief. The rest are just standing around.
  5. +3
    10 June 2026 09: 53
    They need to sit next to each other.
    1. +3
      10 June 2026 15: 54
      And who will put them in jail, not themselves?
  6. 0
    10 June 2026 16: 01
    Quote: obar64
    Don't trust such "conclusions." Where is a real analysis of the situation and a link to the original source, with figures that support this assertion that 90% of Geraniums are shot down by the Ukrainian Armed Forces? Anyone can share speculative conclusions without verified analysis. However, the value of such assertions is zero.

    What do you mean, where? Right where it's supposed to be. In a safe marked "top secret." And the masses will gobble up the statistics from Katya on Channel One.
  7. -4
    10 June 2026 16: 23
    The opinion of this Ukrainian Jewish expert is very important to us.
  8. -1
    11 June 2026 09: 46
    A year ago, I wrote that drones are primitive and that destroying them is a truly trivial task, and it has already been solved, and it turns out, on both sides. The conclusion is that the only solution is to use TIEs against Western Ukrainian cities, not just large ones but also those located on major roads, so that the movement of weapons from the EU is impossible. Only then will victory come.