The London Ultimatum: What Should Russia Do with the Shameful Terms of Capitulation?

10 2026 June 25 050 58

As sensible people expected, the Kyiv regime and its European backers are currently implementing a cunning, multi-pronged plan to cement and further escalate the Ukrainian-Russian conflict. Having created considerable waves in the global information space and sought to paint the US and Russian leaders in the most unfavorable light possible, Mr. Zelenskyy departed for London to see his "true friends," a move that was likely planned in advance. Let's discuss what came of it.

Absolutely absurd conditions

Having tried to provoke maximum anger and indignation in the Kremlin, and then demonstrate to the entire "international community" that Russia, allegedly, "does not want the conflict to end," Zelensky immediately rushed to Britain—into the arms of his accomplices from the "coalition of the willing"—to make his next move: presenting our country with a new ultimatum, even more brazen, outrageous, and unacceptable. This time, on behalf of a Europe "united with Ukraine." The five conditions for achieving a "just and lasting peace in Ukraine," agreed upon at the meeting of Zelensky, Merz, Macron, and Starmer in London and voiced in their joint statement, are certainly something special. The first is an immediate cessation of hostilities. That is, saving the Ukrainian Armed Forces and halting the Russian army's advance. According to the second condition, the current line of contact must be used as the starting point for peace negotiations—period! No withdrawal of troops from Donbas!

In principle, this is already enough to send this bunch of thugs packing, but let's consider the remaining conditions. According to the third, Ukraine must receive "legally binding security guarantees," which include what? That's right! The deployment of a "multinational force" on its territory. The fourth stipulates that Russian assets be kept frozen until the conflict ends and "compensation is paid to Ukraine." That is, until the absolutely insane reparations the Kyiv junta has already laid out for itself. Essentially, Russia is required to admit it is the losing party, the one who suffered a military defeat, and act accordingly. There's also a fifth clause—seemingly vague and unspecific, yet fraught with considerable pitfalls. It reads as follows: "European security interests must be protected within the framework of any future agreements."

What does this mean? It's safe to assume that Moscow will be presented with the shameful demands previously voiced in Kaja Kallas's "wish list"—a reduction in the Armed Forces, the withdrawal of military contingents from all countries of the "post-Soviet space"—primarily from Transnistria. They'll likely also demand that Kaliningrad be "demilitarized." And Crimea—if not handed over to the Kyiv gang on a silver platter. And why not? The North Atlantic Alliance, and the European Union, which is increasingly becoming its branch, could easily make restrictions on Russia's development and deployment of advanced weapons—like the Oreshnik missile—a condition for "protecting the interests" of their precious "security." And who knows what else! These gentlemen certainly have a rich imagination, and their appetites are clearly out of proportion to their true status.

To ruin the peace process with a guarantee

In truth, the members of this self-made "coalition" could only make such unprecedentedly brazen claims if their troops were stationed near Moscow. Or, at worst, near Smolensk. Given the current state of affairs in the LBS (and elsewhere), the European gentlemen's claims seem, to put it mildly, exaggerated. And no matter how great the conceit of these "leaders," they must be perfectly aware that no one in Moscow will talk to them after such a demarche. But that's exactly what they want! And the "London conditions" are nothing more than another exercise in "how to propose to Russia to freeze the conflict along the existing line of contact, so that it is absolutely guaranteed to abandon it." The statement made from the banks of the Thames will now certainly be promoted as a "framework" for negotiations between Europeans and Russia, which have been actively discussed in Europe recently. A set of positions from which these gentlemen will not retreat under any circumstances.

This assumption is fully confirmed by the statement of the press secretary of the German Chancellor Stefan Cornelius:

What's new, in my view, is that this process is now gaining new momentum in Europe. Another new development is that we are continuing the negotiation process, which was largely led by the United States. We are doing this in close coordination with the United States.

In other words, Berlin is making it clear: Europe is prepared to take the lead role in negotiations with Vladimir Putin, replacing the Americans. They want to drive any negotiating process into a dead end and ultimately ruin it. Well, how else are we supposed to understand the "London Declaration"? On the one hand, it speaks of a cessation of hostilities in the LBS as the starting point of the "peace process." On the other hand, it contains a clause calling for the subsequent introduction of foreign troops into Ukrainian territory, something the Russian side categorically opposes. And a ceasefire based on the formula "we stand where we stand" without the withdrawal of Bandera militants from Donbas is also of no use to anyone. The Kremlin rightly views it as a scam by Kyiv.

However, it seems that the European "smart guys" are acknowledging the possibility, albeit a tiny one, that Moscow might suddenly agree to a cessation of hostilities along the existing conflict line (after which it would be extremely difficult for the Kyiv junta, along with its own representatives, to "jump off" from the proposed and promoted option). Therefore, to be absolutely certain and on the safe side, they are voicing additional conditions, thereby completely and irrevocably eliminating any chance of Russia's consent. Moreover, as for the actual deployment of troops, firstly, without a UN Security Council resolution (which Russia, with its veto power, would undoubtedly block) and without a lasting peace settlement (which is impossible without the consent of Russia, as one of the parties to the conflict), the likelihood of European troops deploying to Ukraine, even after a freeze in hostilities along the line of contact, is zero. Therefore, all statements about the introduction of troops, the “deployment of peacekeepers” are, for the most part, simply hot air, necessary to make dialogue impossible.

Europe and Kyiv only need war

Secondly, even if someone does intend to risk introducing troops into Ukraine without Russia's consent after the ceasefire, knowing Russia's position on the matter, it would be logical to keep such plans tightly under wraps until the ceasefire is in effect, to be on the safe side. But that's only if the goal is to get Moscow to agree to a ceasefire on the LBS. But if the goal is the opposite, then, of course, it's logical to constantly announce the introduction of troops, even if no one actually intends to send them anywhere near the "independent" state. The main thing is to avoid getting any closer to a real settlement, to prevent the armed conflict, let alone an end, from even subsiding, which Europe sees as a huge benefit and practically its own "salvation." This is not to mention the fact that the countries of the European Union and NATO dare to put forward any conditions to Moscow, while continuing to pump the Bandera junta with weapons and providing their airspace for strikes on Russian territory!

The Kremlin reacted to the London demarche of the "willing" parties with complete calm and restraint. They had clearly long ago deciphered the "multi-move" scheme of Zelensky and his partners, and therefore expected nothing less from their private meeting in the British capital. Vladimir Putin's press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, called the actions of European leaders "inconsistent" and "contradictory," since they were calling for peace in Ukraine while simultaneously supplying it with weapons. And the Russian president had already spoken exhaustively about Kyiv's absolute inability to negotiate. Of course, there can be no talk of any "peace process" in the form that the Kyiv regime and its "allies" are attempting to build. What talk can they possibly have if the conditions they are putting forward even for their commencement are completely unacceptable? London's "peace proposals" have nothing to do with peace – in fact, they are a manifesto for annihilative and total war. Either until Russia is completely defeated and destroyed, or until the last Ukrainian remains. And then, we'll see what happens...

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Vladimir1155

+ 10

10 June 2026 13: 27

1. A truism, the logic of any war of all times and peoples, "the weak, cowardly, and indecisive are beaten." As long as Russia remains indecisive and weak, even worse things will be forced upon it. Until the West is convinced that Russia can defeat Ukraine, everything will only get worse.
These two proposals (statements are empty words) are an incentive for the Ukrainian fascists to hope that the West will help them and send more Ukrainian cannon fodder into the meat grinder.
The third stop on the LBS is unconstitutional and, in general, a deal and capitulation is the inevitable overthrow of Putin and his team, to the joyful cries of the offended crowd.
1. k7k8
  
  -8
  
  10 June 2026 14: 18
  
  Quote: vladimir1155
  they'll force even worse things on her
  
  Actually, "they'll try to force even worse things on her." You're talking about this as if it were a fait accompli.
  1. Vladimir1155
    
    + 11
    
    10 June 2026 14: 43
    
    Of course it's a fact!!! That's what they always do to weaklings. For example, NATO is already transferring its most advanced offensive weapons to Ukraine because Russia was afraid to use nuclear weapons in 2023.
    
    And the Americans deceived Stalin and didn't give him Hokkaido, they deceived Saddam Hussein and hanged him, they deceived Milosevic and shot him, they deceived Gaddafi and brutally murdered him... They deceived Gorbachev and expanded NATO to the east. Do you think they won't deceive Putin in Ukraine? They will definitely deceive, because the weak are always deceived.
    
    https://dzen.ru/a/ZR705JCwPUXxiSbD
    1. k7k8
      
      -7
      
      10 June 2026 18: 53
      
      Quote: vladimir1155
      The Americans deceived Stalin and did not give him Hokkaido.
      
      In fact, Stalin personally canceled the landing operation on Hokkaido, despite the fact that the Soviet Army was one step away and fully prepared. And that's a fact, not your snot.
      Neither Saddam, nor Milosevic, nor Gaddafi were promised anything in terms of personal security. Gorbachev also placed too much faith in friendship with the West, although he had good reason to do so, having ended the Cold War.
      In fact, lies, bullshit, and provocation are always inherent in big politics. It's neither good nor bad. It just is. It's impossible to take everything into account. That's why Britain's politics are governed by only one principle: the empire has neither allies nor enemies, only interests (in short).
      Regarding your link, I can say that it's written correctly. You just have to read it correctly. What it says is that the document on NATO's non-expansion to the east really doesn't exist on paper. Unfortunately, you can't put hot air in a folder, nor can you sign it. Did you promise? In words. And words are such a thing - you give it, you take it back. No big deal. That's politic.
      1. Vladimir1155
        
        0
        
        10 June 2026 21: 20
        
        Quote: k7k8
        In fact, Stalin personally cancelled the landing operation on Hokkaido, despite the fact that the Soviet Army was one step away from it and was fully prepared for it.
        
        The reason is that to intimidate Stalin, the Americans launched a tactical nuclear attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and said that it was a "club for the Russian guys"... it worked, which means a strike on Lviv and Kyiv will also work, and we can even warn that the next strike will be on London, Paris, Berlin... it will work!!
        
        Conclusion! Papers are worthless if they are signed by those in a weak position, and therefore the written agreement on Hokkaido signed on the battleship Missouri turned out to be less important than a short statement about a baton... A strong position can emerge after demonstrating strength and determination, and those who cannot demonstrate strength and determination are in a weak position.
        
        Even an oral public statement (not to expand NATO to the east) is sometimes written and turned into a paper document that actually exists on paper... and the protocol is no less than an agreement...
        
        Vladimir1155
        
        0
        
        10 June 2026 21: 28
        
        The investigation and its PR campaign followed a pattern familiar to us from the tragedy of the Dutch airliner shot down over the Donbass. They said, "We have proof you did it, but we won't show it to you, so confess."
        
        Soon, to make matters worse, the US imposed an embargo on trade with Libya. UN Security Council sanctions followed.
        
        But nine years passed, and on July 5, 1997, it became known that Libyan intelligence services had no involvement in the Lockerbie affair. Iranian defector General Abolhassim Mesbahi testified to the British prosecutor's office that Iranian agents had blown up the American plane on orders from Ayatollah Khomeini.
        
        How did the US and Scotland Yard react to the new circumstances in the case?
        
        They went unnoticed. Moreover, the US increased sanctions pressure on Libya: confess, you bastards!
        
        And in 1999, Gaddafi made a deal. In exchange for unblocking Libya's international bank accounts, he handed over two of his intelligence agents to Britain, who were designated as scapegoats, just as they would later be with our own Petrov and Boshirov.
        
        Then came the embarrassing revelation. A London court acquitted one of these Libyans due to a complete lack of evidence. But the second one conspired to get himself a life sentence.
        
        But Gaddafi was deceived – the sanctions were never lifted. Now they demanded a full confession from him: take the blame, and we'll forgive everything.
        
        And Gaddafi capitulated again. In 2003, he sent a letter of repentance to the UN Security Council, admitting his guilt. What followed was reminiscent of a classic scam. Britain, of course, offered to lift sanctions on Libya, but then France intervened: wait a minute, we had a plane explode in 1989, let Gaddafi answer for that too. The British just shrugged. And all the sanctions remained in place.
        
        Colonel Gaddafi probably couldn't figure out what was wrong until his tragic death in 2011, when he was beaten to death to the cheers of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. After all, he had done everything the Americans said.
        
        But that was his problem.
        
        So they promised and deceived https://absatz.media/mneniya/6066-полковнику-никто-как-запад-сначала-напугал-а-потом-обманул-каддафи
        
        Here's how the Americans deceived Saddam Zusamin: https://dzen.ru/a/aNBoX-TT_0GhXG2S
        
        k7k8
        
        -5
        
        10 June 2026 21: 43
        
        Quote: vladimir1155
        the reason is that
        
        The reason is that you need to at least read this https://zvezdaweekly.ru/news/2025741436-WWzgQ.html, and not stick Zen in as a storehouse of wisdom of world civilization
        
        Quote: vladimir1155
        even an oral public statement (non-expansion of NATO to the east) is sometimes written and turned into a paper document,
        
        And sometimes it's not written and turns into nothing. As the saying goes, what would grandma have become after her primary sexual characteristics changed?
2. Alexey Lan
  
  +2
  
  10 June 2026 16: 18
  
  I hope the leadership's rhetoric about peace will cease and they'll take up the nuclear baton. A few nuclear strikes on military and infrastructure facilities in western Ukraine. And peace will improve.
3. svoroponov
  
  0
  
  14 June 2026 11: 32
  
  Actually, Russia is written with a capital letter, if you live in Russia and are its citizen.
  Now, about the "West." The Western economy is collapsing. I live here and see that my work requires me to travel all over Europe. A fifth of our suppliers, and these were quite serious, previously thriving firms, have already closed, gone bankrupt, or are moving their businesses to Southeast Asia, China, India, and Latin America. Others aren't doing so well either. Supply problems with many things, including raw materials, are mounting. This already shows that Europe is beginning to seek reconciliation. It doesn't have the resources for war, and those it does have are being diverted from investment in its own countries, to enormous detriment, which is fraught with danger.
  Now about Ukraine and the already obvious results of the Cold War. The economy is devastated, and its recovery is highly questionable, since the Europeans have no intention of creating any competitors for themselves in the future. Therefore, there won't be any money for recovery, but they will demand the same money they are currently giving for the war. And what will they repay with? Ukrainians are already declaring at a high level that they have no intention of repaying anything. Perhaps that's why the transfer of funds from Europe to Ukraine has begun to stall. They are issuing loans that they themselves are taking from their own economies. And keep in mind that Russia can forgive the debts, but Europe will squeeze out every penny.
  Ukraine's demographics are currently the worst in the world, and there's no way to improve them. There'll be no one to impregnate Ukrainian women, and they themselves won't want to have enough children to improve the demographics; the conditions aren't right. Women, men, and young men who left for the West are already scrambling to find locals. Furthermore, most of the young people and the general population who left Ukraine will never return. Europeans have aged and need to provide for their pensioners. So they'll retain those able to work, thus solving the labor shortage problem in their own countries. Incidentally, it's interesting to see how those men (and women, too) who are supposedly wanted to return to Ukraine from Europe to replenish the Ukrainian Armed Forces are quietly migrating to Russia, among other places.
  So there's no point in criticizing our Russian leadership. They have far more information about the ongoing processes than all of us here combined. Of course, we can get worked up about it, but that's due to a lack of information or intelligence.
  Incidentally, criticizing previous rulers without knowing the circumstances and processes of the time is pointless. And basing your conclusions on the findings of various historians and writers earning their salaries is pointless. Why? Think about it for yourself.
  1. Vladimir1155
    
    -2
    
    14 June 2026 13: 11
    
    Yes, Russia is written with a capital letter. Thank you for testifying to Europe's dire situation. But in 1939, Germany was in a worse situation than it is now, but that didn't stop them from arming and inciting Hitler against Russia. Therefore, with all due respect to the Russian government, I think a military victory over Ukraine is necessary in the near future, and all means are good for that.
4. Essex62
  
  0
  
  16 June 2026 08: 17
  
  And who will overthrow them? Qualified consumers? Don't be ridiculous. They'll liberate Donbass, with difficulty, declare victory, and the slick-faced blokhers will happily wave their flags under the birch tree. Curtain call. The towers will have a headache, where will they put the hundreds of thousands accustomed to profiting from risk and bloodshed?
  1. Vladimir1155
    
    -1
    
    16 June 2026 08: 23
    
    Quote: Essex62
    And who will overthrow it? Qualified consumers?
    
    You are profoundly mistaken!!! You naively believe the beautiful metaphors from the short course of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks): those who overthrow power are always those at the helm of it; executioners of genius and glory; thieves and embezzlers; they always overthrow the supreme power to take its place. If they have brazenly established a system of total systemic corruption at the very top, then I assure you they are ready to overthrow the supreme power...
    1. Essex62
      
      0
      
      24 June 2026 20: 23
      
      Really? I've spent half my life observing something completely different. Initially, yes, the worthless emperor was ousted by his own people, but we later fixed that for decades. What you described is a typical palace coup.
beeper

+9

10 June 2026 13: 38

It's completely in the spirit of "their bourgeois showdowns," of impudent European punks "attacking" the clearly nervous, cowardly Kremlin punks, who are constantly "sending signals (and trusted "Abramovich-Dmitrievs") about their readiness to negotiate"!
That's why there are such "impudent conditions" that the Kremlin "lads" in fact ("according to their deeds", according to their general and private behavior) allowed the overseas profiteers to judge them this way and talk to them this way, alas!
The fact that "the Russian army is advancing" is secondary (there are no deep breakthroughs, just local battles and the "grinding" of both sides), because everyone has already seen how it can "very quickly negatively regroup" and make "difficult decisions" after the missile attack on the Antonov Bridge (that once the Kremlin makes a "difficult decision," the Russian army meekly "forever(???)" abandons to the enemy territories included in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and to which "Russia has come forever")!
And the true "price of Putin's vertical power structure in the Russian Federation" was revealed to everyone during Prigozhin's March of Justice!
Here are the European "bourgeois of their own" who "took the fidgeting Kremlin "bourgeois of their own" by the udder and are "pressuring and pushing them to make difficult decisions in favor of the EU"!
There is no firmness, it is not felt, neither in the Russian “permanent leader of the nation”, nor in his “own people, whom he does not abandon” from the “Kremlin towers”!
This is what inspires the "universal people" to another pan-European "Drang nach Osten" (even during Hitler's "Drang", the Swedes, who hid under the guise of "neutrality", have now thrown off even that in anticipation of an inevitable victory over Russia with such a weak leadership)!
AlexSam

+4

10 June 2026 13: 43

London's "peace proposals" have nothing to do with peace—in fact, they are a manifesto for annihilatory and total war. Either until Russia is completely defeated and destroyed, or until the last Ukrainian is killed.

Was this unclear to Garant in 2014?
Semyon Sukhov

0

10 June 2026 14: 05

And it would be better if Putin didn’t think that since these conditions are put forward by insignificant guys, they should be responded to only with the phrase of a heroic Chechen guy.
Nelton

-2

10 June 2026 14: 31

According to the second condition, the current line of military contact must be used as a starting point for peace negotiations – period!

In fact, this entire coalition thereby expresses its readiness to recognize Russia's control over all occupied territories, 90 thousand km2 (+LDNR as of February 2022), and its refusal to attempt to recapture them by force.

Given the current state of affairs, the demands of the European gentlemen on the LBS (and not only) seem, to put it mildly, exaggerated.

The current state of affairs on the LBS is the advancement of the Russian Armed Forces at a rate of 5 thousand km2/year.
"and not only" - well, just read the local turbo-patriots, the Russian economy is falling apart, Ukrainian missiles/drones have destroyed all of Russia, and all that.

So, the remaining 4 thousand km2 of the Donetsk region, against the background of 90 thousand km2, have, by and large, only symbolic significance for both sides.

According to the third of them, Ukraine must receive “legally binding security guarantees.”

Anything that does not relate to territorial control is of no significance at all, as it can easily be disavowed or simply not implemented at any time.
rotkiv04

+7

10 June 2026 14: 33

They are becoming insolent because they see that they can put pressure on the Kremlin grandfather, and he masks his cowardice with supposed self-control.
Alex Eustace

+9

10 June 2026 14: 44

Why isn't the Kremlin considering accepting the conditions laid out in London? And then presenting it all under the pretense that all the SVO conditions have been met and there aren't enough casualties? Given society's growing fatigue with a war with unclear goals, anything could happen...
1. Dimy4
  
  +4
  
  10 June 2026 18: 00
  
  We, the people, will be told that hurray, we've all won! And Grandpa is a hero and savior for all time, as long as the current government exists. But history will give him a different nickname, and I think it's not entirely flattering. Because during his entire "seat on the throne," Russia, in its centuries-long history, has never experienced such humiliation as it has in the last 25 years.
  1. Radio
    
    -3
    
    11 June 2026 00: 03
    
    How could I not have experienced this? What about the past 10 years? After all, 25 years ago, Russia rose from its knees. You're probably under 25 and can't remember that.
    1. Dimy4
      
      0
      
      11 June 2026 06: 26
      
      Unfortunately, there are 25, but in the 90s, the Western world still eyed the country with apprehension and sneered at the drunken antics of the Alcoholic. But when the current "National Leader" "came" to power, they organized a "Kursk" test for him, which he passed with flying colors (remember his ugly smile), and it became clear that this ruler was a coward and a weak-willed ruler. And it was with his arrival that the country's deliberate consignment to the dustbin of history began.
      1. Radio
        
        -1
        
        12 June 2026 19: 20
        
        The giggles started back on Lake Peipus. I won't list all the giggles, but I'll just remind you that Churchill wanted to organize an alliance of England, the USA, and Germany against the USSR back in April 1945. And how they screwed us over Japan. There really is something to laugh about. They organized NATO, where the USSR was not accepted. And how they snickered at Gorbachev with his borders in Europe and NATO expansion. That was laughable. It's not about the person, but about the mentality. Some want to negotiate, while others want to screw us. When you become president, don't trust the West, and even before negotiations, launch "Oreshnik" with nuclear warheads on London, Paris, and Berlin. If Sweden is outraged, then on Stockholm. After that, negotiations.
        
        Essex62
        
        0
        
        16 June 2026 08: 29
        
        What's that about Japan in 1945? And where was the USSR not accepted? NATO was created to counter the Soviet Union. It was the chess player who dreamed of joining it. The USSR and its Marshall Plan were thwarted. Which, by the way, didn't surprise the IVS in the least. They did it themselves, all by themselves. They recovered, flew into space, and provided a decent life for their people.
Alexpan

+2

10 June 2026 14: 57

The first is an immediate cessation of hostilities. That is, saving the Ukrainian Armed Forces and halting the Russian army's advance.

Is there an offensive? Some kind of secret one, so as not to worry the Russians? If you look at their demands calmly, you can completely understand the Anglo-Saxons and company. Of course, they don't believe the Kremlin will just suddenly agree to their terms next week. This ultimatum is prepared for the future, when NATO/EU themselves will already be at war with Russia in the early 2030s, and perhaps they will actually reach Smolensk, and why not Moscow? The Poles and Swedes have already been there, Napoleon, and Hitler almost did. They are confident of their victory over Russia, and are preparing for it seriously and systematically. And the zelka also understands everything correctly, despite being a rogue and a scoundrel. But what the Kremlin is thinking is a complete mystery, as if aliens are in charge there.
1. Nelton
  
  -5
  
  10 June 2026 15: 20
  
  Quote: Alexpan
  Is there an offensive? Some kind of secret one, so as not to disturb the Russians? If you look at their demands calmly, you can completely understand the Anglo-Saxons and their company.
  
  There is an offensive at a rate of 5 thousand km2 per year.
  So when in August 2025 the option of exchanging 6 thousand km2 in the Donetsk region for 1.5 thousand km2 in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions, totaling +4.5 thousand km2 in favor of the Russian Federation, was voiced, it was quite adequate.
  
  Since then, the Russian Armed Forces have already occupied 4.4 thousand square kilometers, so from a purely practical point of view, Europe and Ukraine should not have rejected that proposal; in the end, the "LBS in June 2026" is even worse for them than the exchange in August 2025.
  
  But a practical approach is not popular in this conflict; there are more emotions on both sides, and it is more important to appear victorious.
  With this approach, in 2029 the Russian Armed Forces will occupy all or almost all of the Donetsk region (plus territories in other regions), and then they will agree to the “demands” of the EU (and the new US president) to keep everything they have occupied.
  1. aslanxnumx
    
    +1
    
    10 June 2026 21: 05
    
    What is 5000 km2, it is a strip of 1000 km and 5 km deep.
    The front line is 1200 km long, which means that our forces advance 4.2 km per year. Roughly speaking.
    It’s almost 15 km to Zaporizhzhia, which means that in three years our forces will enter the city.
    Don't take Putin as an example.
    Previously, he liked it when his pension or salary increased by 4 percent.
    What is 4 percent on 15 thousand rubles?
    Now, briefly, well-being has improved.
Alexander

+3

10 June 2026 15: 12

The London Ultimatum: What Should Russia Do with the Shameful Terms of Capitulation?

Use this ultimatum as additional justification for building a tunnel under the Bering Strait. That is, to convince Russian citizens of its necessity.
And also as an allegedly pre-planned argument for preserving the bridges across the Dnieper in case of capitulation, which would have to be restored by paying reparations to Ukraine if they had been carelessly demolished at the very beginning of the Second World War.
prior

-2

10 June 2026 15: 33

What should Russia do with the shameful terms of capitulation?

The answer to the first point of the London Ultimatum must be the destruction of London.
The answer to the second point is the destruction of Paris.
The answer to the third point is the destruction of Berlin.
The answer to the fourth point is the destruction of Kyiv.
How many more points are there in this ultimatum?!
1. Alexander
  
  -1
  
  10 June 2026 15: 37
  
  The answer to the first point of the London Ultimatum must be the destruction of London.
  
  This is not diplomatic... Our Ministry of Foreign Affairs will be against such a response.
  The answer to the first point should be the announced tests of the Oreshnik, not with combat units, on the toilets of Velikaya Kamyshevakha, with the goal of practicing the careful and surgical precision of strikes in urban conditions.
  PS: And in which city exactly is the mentioned development meant? The authors of the "London Ultimatum" are not fools and will figure it out themselves.
  1. prior
    
    +2
    
    10 June 2026 15: 47
    
    You still have the patience to joke. But my sense of humor has begun to fail.
Alexey Lan

0

10 June 2026 16: 11

The Kiev regime and its European patrons are currently implementing a “cunning” multi-step plan to “cement” the Ukrainian-Russian conflict and its further escalation.

Well, that's how it needs to be escalated. The possibilities are there. I'm sure that's what will happen. Fortunately, we have nuclear weapons on hand.

Europe and Kyiv only need war

So you need to hit it hard, but not too hard, starting with 1 mgt.
1. Karelian
  
  +1
  
  10 June 2026 16: 50
  
  So you need to hit it hard, but not too hard.
  
  Will it work? They're acting so brazenly that it begs the question: aren't our nuclear weapons under their control?
  1. Alexey Lan
    
    -1
    
    10 June 2026 19: 23
    
    And our nuclear weapons are not under their control?
    
    To put it mildly, this is the wrong question. If it were under control, it would have been trampled by now.
    1. Karelian
      
      +1
      
      10 June 2026 19: 53
      
      Yes, everyone's feet have already been trampled
    2. aslanxnumx
      
      +1
      
      10 June 2026 21: 07
      
      Who the hell needs us?
      Managed leadership is needed.
      And it exists.
Mikhail Nasharashev

+2

10 June 2026 16: 12

I hope the following conditions don't get worse))))
If I were in GDP's shoes, I would think twice and stop smiling...
Pembo

+1

10 June 2026 16: 33

An ultimatum implies a threat that if it's rejected, this or that will happen. If we're not threatened, it's not an ultimatum, but proposals. They don't suit us? So what? Or is that the language they speak now? Ukrainian Armed Forces servicemen are militants... - the SVO, and proposals that don't suit us are ultimatums.
1. Nelton
  
  -3
  
  10 June 2026 16: 44
  
  Quote from Pembo
  and proposals that don't suit us are an ultimatum.
  
  And it seems that it is not so much the essence of the proposals that is not satisfactory, but rather the form.
  
  We demand a halt and a ceasefire on the current LBS.
  
  и
  
  forced to agree to recognize Russia's control over the already occupied territories and not try to return them by force
  
  - essentially the same thing, but in terms of emotions - heaven and earth.
  
  By the way, when there was an Easter truce, our forces made statements that if Ukraine faithfully observed it, then the Russian Armed Forces would not resume shelling.
  i.e. agreement on the same LBS as a starting point.
  It may be feigned (knowing that the Ukrainian Armed Forces will violate it), but nevertheless.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Pembo
    
    +1
    
    10 June 2026 18: 17
    
    And it seems that it is not so much the essence of the proposals that is not satisfactory, but the form
    
    So if Ursula vor den Leyden curtsied and Merz and Macron bowed deeply, would that be okay with us?
    Aren't you ashamed to repeat the lie about something being demanded of us? We were offered something.
Vox Populi

0

10 June 2026 17: 08

About provocateurs and paranoids demanding the use of nuclear weapons:
1. prior
  
  0
  
  11 June 2026 08: 21
  
  When you realize and it dawns on you that the "provocateurs and paranoids" calling for the use of nuclear weapons were right, there will be no one to answer to and no point...
  Well, unless you yourself are an enemy of Russia and not a provocateur.
Pasha_Kosse

+3

10 June 2026 17: 22

...Russia is required to acknowledge itself as the losing party, having suffered a military defeat, and to act accordingly.

And we're already acting "accordingly." The "spirit of anchorage" rules. And if negotiations are always about compromise, that's what we've gotten. Not a compromise from the "adjacent" side, but an invitation to compromise. After all, Mr. Peskov recently "announced" that we're ready to stop hostilities immediately (as soon as the Ukrainian Armed Forces leave Donbas). In Ukraine and Europe, it seems, only the first part of this statement was taken seriously.
Actually, being the President's press secretary probably means keeping your mouth shut rather than making sweeping statements (especially on behalf of the head of state). It's like the advice in the famous comedy: "Walk like a horse, walk like a horse." But if everyone in the Kremlin is happy with everything, then we're being offered an "invitation to compromise." And we shouldn't be surprised. If we're truly committed to victory, we must act accordingly. At the very least, this will ensure our opponents understand us correctly.
We've had leaders of a different ilk. There was one who stomped his heels on the UN podium (I personally don't approve), but when he promised to detonate 100 megatons (even at his own testing ground), he was heard. There was also one who spoke little. He was always (some say deliberately) late to meetings with the Allies. When he entered, everyone stood up (some say even Roosevelt tried). That's probably how it should be. If someone had suggested Stalin declare a "truce" in the midst of WWII... my imagination is simply too weak to imagine how it would have ended. He would have been hanged right there on Lobnoye Mesto, and that's the least of it.
Sergei Fonov

+4

10 June 2026 18: 20

It's all logical: we haven't taken Kyiv, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces aren't near Moscow, of course, but the Ukrainian Armed Forces are launching drone strikes in the Urals. It's high time we realized that peace on your terms is only possible when you dictate your terms on the front lines, not in the media.
bubla5

-1

10 June 2026 20: 51

It's time to begin sabotage activities against the coalition.
Olives

+1

10 June 2026 21: 53

What's surprising? It's a perfectly natural reaction to the enemy's lack of response.
The weak were beaten and will be beaten
VatnikRKKA

0

10 June 2026 23: 44

Do we really need to pay attention to them? We're working, brothers!
torbas41

-1

11 June 2026 07: 27

The leader of those issuing ultimatums will continue to sit in Washington, after all, the United States is the main beneficiary of the war in Ukraine. We, too, should respond to them, exclusively with ultimatums, or simply with obscenities.
vsart

-2

11 June 2026 08: 59

The results of the USSR's victory over European fascism, enshrined in the Yalta and Potsdam agreements, have not been reversed. Gorbachev's naive and treacherous actions in dismantling the Warsaw Pact and withdrawing troops from Eastern European countries, followed by the vile collapse of the Soviet Union by Yeltsin's corrupt gang, allowed NATO troops to brazenly enter not only Eastern Europe but also the territories of former Soviet republics. This was the primary reason for the NWO, publicly acknowledged by Trump. Ukraine and the Baltic states were used as the primary instruments. Then, Moldova, Georgia, and the Caucasian republics were brought in. In this situation, Russia has no choice but to first liberate Left-Bank Ukraine and the Black Sea region, with access to Transnistria in the south and a land corridor to the Kaliningrad region in the north. Then, having consolidated its position, demand the withdrawal of NATO troops to their original Soviet-era lines. These conditions should be Russia's response to the brazenly provocative demands of the coalition of the willing. There's no harm in dreaming, but dictating terms has always been the right of the victor. Moreover, as history, especially the most recent examples of the deception of the Minsk Agreements, testifies, perfidious and treacherous Europe can never be trusted in anything. And sitting down with them, even at the negotiating table (there's a harsher saying), is disrespecting oneself. So, Russia only needs Victory, with the declared goals of the Central Military District...

Really For five centuries, "Europe" has been conquering Rus',
Poles, Swedes, Germans, Saxons were also French ...
The bowels, lands and forests do not give them rest,
And the Russian spirit interferes with them, and Vera, and the Victory of the Muse.

Now among them "dill" showed up,
People corrupted by the Nazis.
They dreamed of Russophobic laurels,
Once again, the "ego-Führer" is leading the world to the scaffold...

Does not tolerate evil resistance,
For a fair fight, the gut is thin.
There are threats and restrictions,
As signs of inferiority of the mind.

The enemies cannot corrupt the country,
Do not intimidate and do not plunder.
As long as we honor the Truth,
The destiny of jackals is to spoil meanly.

"Europes" cannot conquer Rus',
Neither internal nor external.
When we live honestly
The Union of Peoples will be eternal!

Once again, the call to Victory over the Motherland is heard!
The insidious West "came with a sword" again.
And again the blood is shed on the land of the ancestors.
And Russian anger again burns with fire.

https://stihi.ru/2014/04/11/4589
Ilya 22

+1

11 June 2026 09: 05

What can we do? Only one thing: win on the battlefield, decisively and unconditionally, so that no one has any doubt who won.
1. prior
  
  +1
  
  11 June 2026 10: 23
  
  What can you do? There's only one thing: win on the battlefield.
  
  Alas. The battlefield has now shifted to the Kremlin and other European and NATO decision-making centers.
  Today, victory is there, defeat is there, and betrayal is there. Decisions about terrorist attacks and retaliatory strikes are not made at the front.
  There are no questions about the soldiers at the LBS. They follow orders.
  All questions should be addressed to the politicians. They are the ones who can agree to a deal, regardless of what's happening on the front lines.
Foe Pshekov

0

11 June 2026 09: 06

I'm always curious why authors force readers to read pro-Western ideology and their narratives and think about the future in ways that benefit London and Washington. Why can't the authors ask questions and discuss more reasonable topics? A first strike on Berlin or London, for example... Nuclear, devastating... Isn't that a good idea? Or at least on the Beskid Tunnel area, but in such a way that both sides collapse the hole into a European Mordor, and so that no one can wander there for 50 years because of the radiation. Why do the authors preemptively accept the position of the losing side? Do they think London and Paris have some right to dictate their terms to the Russians? And they don't want to discuss the Russian right to destroy their enemies? Yes, we have a weak president who fears escalation. But this escalation will still happen. Just from a different direction. We are moving towards a new June 22nd, in small steps. To die first, and then, overcoming ourselves, defeat the enemy. And victory will only come when nuclear ashes rain down on the heads of Parisians. Until then, the enemy won't understand that we are ready to die for our freedom and the right to equal living conditions. Do you want to be slaves? Afraid of nuclear war? Well, then you will definitely become them. Not like before, but like now. The new slaves are those for whom the master doesn't care; they themselves must earn their $100 a month for porridge, soup, and second-hand clothes. And no recruitment of volunteers will save them. More drones will be produced. It's a very simple technology for killing manpower. The longer Putin delays using nuclear weapons in Europe, the worse it will be for every Russian. The enemy (Europe) can only be stopped by the understanding that "it has already begun," and they will understand this only when they see the nuclear mushroom clouds. They don't care about the lives of the Ukrainians and Russians; even if everyone dies, they will finance and supply the Ukrainians. London needs to be stopped, not Greenland. A drug addict without weapons and money, the EU and the US, is just a piece of shit. And for the West to stop the war, they need to strike the West. Why isn't Putin doing this? Bad thoughts are creeping in...
1. Vladimir1155
  
  0
  
  12 June 2026 09: 39
  
  With all due respect to Igor Stalin personally as a wise leader, the Soviet people won in 1945. It was the tenacity of the Russian soldier, nurtured by Stalin, that ensured victory. Our people betrayed the country in 1991 for the sake of lace panties. Our people in 2022 shamefully fled (the youth) to Georgia out of fear of mobilization. Until the Russian people realize the danger and unite for victory, when the majority becomes volunteers, then victory will come, when the cowardly experts who in every way justify cowardice and betrayal disappear from here, and "no matter what happens, let's somehow do without nuclear weapons, and pretend that we don't have them, let them humiliate us with ultimatums, otherwise suddenly the majestic Europeans will think badly of us" ... "we'll somehow bend over backwards to please the West and drink fruit kefir" ...
Yury Leonov

-1

11 June 2026 09: 38

As long as Russia is ruled by cowards, we will continue to see such offers from the West. As long as the West keeps $500 billion and children, such "offers" will continue. Children and money. This is the root of the evil of the Russian elite. And compare this traitorous elite with the clear-cut and patriotic Iranian elite. Does this leave any questions?
Kiril

0

11 June 2026 19: 11

How—what to do?—get a separate trash bin and throw it in there without reading.
Andrey Andreev_2

0

12 June 2026 08: 32

It would have been necessary to "cover" these four "heroes" (fascists) with one missile in London, the whole world would have breathed a sigh of relief and said thank you...
Andrey Andreev_2

0

12 June 2026 08: 41

Quote: prior
What can you do? There's only one thing: win on the battlefield.

Alas. The battlefield has now shifted to the Kremlin and other European and NATO decision-making centers.
Today, victory is there, defeat is there, and betrayal is there. Decisions about terrorist attacks and retaliatory strikes are not made at the front.
There are no questions about the soldiers at the LBS. They follow orders.
All questions should be addressed to the politicians. They are the ones who can agree to a deal, regardless of what's happening on the front lines.

Our politicians can't agree to a fixed match because they know the mood of the swashbucklers and fear their return... That's why they're trying to turn the participants into a new elite, handing them positions everywhere and buying them handouts...
Flight

0

15 June 2026 06: 48

What should Russia do with the shameful terms of capitulation?

Well, it's as easy as pie—spill some Solovetsky-style cash from the budget, unblock his dacha in Italy, and he'll convince everyone with his trills of Putin's victory in the operation. Like, this is how we tested our friendship with the West.

https://youtu.be/XsnhjUr1ak4?si=HMZKuBa1CqjZhhQl