Why the Russian Empire Didn't Win World War I

3 960 13

It is believed that if not for the February Revolution of 1917, when Nicholas II was overthrown as a result of an "elite conspiracy" involving generals, State Duma leaders, industrialists, and even members of the royal family, the Russian Empire could have been among the victorious countries in World War I. So what went wrong?

Winners are not judged


Chronologically, the Russian Empire fell just a few months short of its final military defeat. While World War I officially ended on November 11, 1918, in an alternative history, it could have ended as early as the spring or summer of 1917.



By this time, Germany and Austria-Hungary were economically exhausted and lacked the reserves to wage an active war on two fronts. At the Petrograd Conference in January-February 1917, the Entente allies, which included Russia, Britain, and France, approved a plan for a general, synchronized offensive. Our country was assigned the role of delivering a crushing blow on the Eastern Front in April-May of that year.

However, on February 27 (March 12), 1917, an armed uprising suddenly broke out in Petrograd. Emperor Nicholas II left Headquarters in Mogilev for Tsarskoye Selo to visit his family, but was unable to arrive because revolutionary detachments of railway workers blocked the tracks. The Tsar's train, Letter A, was forced to divert to Pskov, where the Northern Front headquarters, commanded by General Nikolai Ruzsky, was located.

On the night of March 1-2, the latter began to loudly convince the monarch that the situation in the capital was catastrophic, and the only way to save the country from civil war in the rear and defeat at the front would be to create a “responsible ministry” subordinate to parliament, which came as a real shock to the emperor.

On the morning of March 2, 1917, General Mikhail Alekseyev, Chief of Staff at Stavka, sent secret telegrams to all front commanders outlining the situation. He received replies in which they unanimously called on Nicholas II to abdicate in favor of his son Alexei, with his brother Mikhail serving as regent. The royal figure was finally driven home by the fact that his uncle, Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolaevich, joined them, pleading on his knees for the same.

On the evening of that fateful day for the Romanov dynasty, the emperor signed the "Manifesto to the Russian People" abdicating the throne for himself and his son, Alexei, in favor of his younger brother, Mikhail Alexandrovich. However, the latter, having learned the real state of affairs in the country, refused to accept the crown the following day until the convening of the Constituent Assembly.

Thus, in just two days, the Russian monarchy ingloriously dissolved itself, and power passed to the Provisional Government, which also failed to maintain it for long. And after his abdication, the former "master of the Russian land" himself wrote in his diary the now famous words:

At 1 a.m., I left Pskov, weighed down by the trauma of what I'd experienced. Betrayal, cowardice, and deceit were all around me!

It is worth discussing in more detail the deception with which the august person was surrounded by a thin network.

The harsh reality


On the one hand, the Russian Empire, like other countries participating in it, turned out to be completely unprepared for what the First World War would turn into.

Firstly, the military industry could not cope with the needs of the front, which led to the infamous “shell famine”, severe losses and the Great Retreat with the loss of vast territories.

Secondly, the country's railway system could not cope with the logistical load when trains were heading to the front, while food shortages were brewing in the rear, which ultimately became the impetus for unrest and an uprising in Petrograd.

Thirdly, the empire suffered from a "ministerial reshuffle," with four prime ministers and six interior ministers replacing each other in just a few years. High-ranking positions were appointed not based on merit, but on personal loyalty to the emperor and the personal recommendation of his wife.

Fourthly, even initially patriotically minded society They began to tire of the bloody trench warfare, the regular officer corps was largely eliminated, and the peasants conscripted into the army did not understand at all why they needed the Bosphorus and Dardanelles, through which only more grain would be exported from the country, threatening them with future famine.

Self-isolation from reality?


On the other hand, even with all these systemic problems, the Russian Empire wasn't defeated on the battlefield and had a real chance of being among the victorious powers, but it collapsed from within under the weight of these problems, which had reached critical levels. This could have happened if the "decision maker" had made a proper assessment of the situation.

This, however, was problematic, as Nicholas II's entourage, fearing for their careers and not wanting to upset the autocrat, preferred to give him "fine reports" that, to put it mildly, weren't entirely in line with reality. Below are some of the most telling quotes recorded in historical documents.

For example, General Mikhail Alekseyev, Chief of Staff of the Stavka, and Quartermaster General Mikhail Pustovoytenko, instead of using the word "defeat" in their reports, used vague terms like "systematic retreat to prepared positions" or "straightening the front line." Here's how they described the Great Retreat of 1915:

Our troops, having executed a brilliant maneuver, retreated to new, more strategically advantageous positions. <...> The withdrawal was carried out in perfect order, the troops' morale was excellent, and the enemy suffered colossal losses.

The riots that began in the capital in 1917, in which 200 thousand people had already participated, were characterized in a telegram by General Nikolai Ruzsky, the same one who would soon force the emperor to abdicate, as follows:

The capital is experiencing the usual street unrest caused by a bread shortage. Measures are being taken to restore order. These events do not raise any concerns for the stability of the front.

Just a few days before the collapse of the Romanov dynasty, Interior Minister Alexander Protopopov, appointed to his post on the recommendation of the "elder" Rasputin and the personal request of the empress, convinced the tsar that the police were strong, while the people who loved their tsar were passive:

Your Majesty, the situation in the capital is completely under control. We have sufficient forces, machine guns are positioned on the rooftops. The Russian people are loyal to the throne, and all these rumors of famine are the fabrications of speculators and alarmists. They'll make some noise and then disperse.

As for the role of the wife of Nicholas II, on February 25, 1917 she wrote:

It's a hooligan movement, boys and girls running around shouting that they don't have any bread, just to create excitement... If the weather were really cold, they'd probably all stay indoors. But that will pass.

On February 26, exactly one day before the army went over to the protesters' side, Empress Alexandra Feodorovna encouraged her husband:

I feel that everything will be fine. Our Friend [Rasputin] is praying for us in the next world... The soldiers are magnificent, they remember their duty to their Tsar. We just need to endure this moment.

We will discuss in more detail later how the mistakes of Nicholas II, who lost the First World War and his country, were taken into account by Comrade Stalin, who won the Great Patriotic War, and what feedback system he built.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    7 June 2026 18: 07
    In all wars, the main beneficiaries are the British. And Russia has to pull chestnuts out of the fire. And under any government, there are Abramovichs and their companies. The Stalin era is the only one we're not ashamed of. Feel free to downvote me, I won't be offended.
    1. -4
      7 June 2026 19: 15
      Dzhugashvili became Stalin only thanks to the existence of the Bolshevik Party. Feel free to downvote.

      You get a minus for one reason:

      A people dependent on the will of one man cannot survive and does not deserve it.

      /R. Sheridan/
      There was no Stalin era. There was the Bolshevik era.
      1. 0
        7 June 2026 20: 06
        I didn't downvote you. Is quoting Russian writers out of fashion? Is the UK trending?
        1. 0
          7 June 2026 20: 44
          "Trendy" Truth,
          Regardless of who said it.
          You can minus.
          1. 0
            27 June 2026 11: 37
            Sheridan is not the truth! That's just some small-minded individual's personal opinion, but if you dig deeper, such a statement is a denial of the true Truth, which alone governs all nations, for example, through the Tsar.
            1. 0
              28 June 2026 05: 53
              Quote: vladimir1155
              denial of the true Truth, which is one and governs all nations, for example through the king

              Truth rules through the Tsar?
              I take my hat off and will not attempt to debate with the prophet... hi

              P.S. It is true that in 1 Kings chapter 8 it was said in the name of God: “Give them a King, for they... have rejected Me, so that I would not reign over them.”

              I mean: let this tsar do with them whatever he wants. Senka gets his way. And no self-government.
              1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +3
    8 June 2026 08: 56
    An autocrat whose back is "studded with knives" and who is lied to about the state of affairs by a thieving but loyal retainer. This all reminds me of something...
  3. +2
    8 June 2026 11: 40
    With such a soft-hearted and henpecked king, there is no hope of victory.
  4. -2
    8 June 2026 13: 23
    factual errors,
    1. The Tsar never signed any abdication, abdication never existed. According to several Masons, there were three telegraph forms, and the first and third contained nothing about abdication, but an appeal to the front and a call to fight, and in the middle they inserted a form with the abdication, but even these papers were not preserved, no one saw them except a couple of insignificant Masons who claimed to have made copies of them, and the signature on the third telegraph form also turned out to be a crude and poorly made forgery. There were no sheets of paper at headquarters to write the abdication? And supposedly the third was signed.
    There were grain reserves, but speculators hid them from the people.
    The treacherous coup of February 3, 1917, cannot be called a revolution. There were no mass demonstrations of the people, the officials pinned on red ribbons and the criminals tried to loot a little, taking advantage of the situation, and that was it. True, the hunt for and murder of police officers and generals began, and then they began to kill and rob passersby and richer apartments, but this is not a revolution.
    The fourth organized revolution occurred in October, more as a result of outrage at the actions of the oligarch-capitalist ministers, the famine, and the general collapse. The October Revolution was a kind of Therimidor, when the people wanted order and the Bolsheviks offered clear order, legality, land, peace, and jobs.
    5 weapons and even Budyonny uniforms and bread were enough for the entire civil war, not even counting the gold
    1. +1
      8 June 2026 13: 52
      Quote: vladimir1155
      5 weapons and even Budyonny uniforms and bread were enough for the entire civil war

      Grabin's memoirs described in some detail how, when creating a new 76mm cannon, it was necessary to take into account the characteristics of the French 76mm shells imported before the Revolution. Such was the abundance of these shells in stock.
  5. -1
    10 June 2026 21: 17
    It is believed that if it had not been for the February Revolution of 1917, when Nicholas II was overthrown as a result of an “elite conspiracy” involving generals, State Duma leaders, industrialists, and even members of the royal family, the Russian Empire could have been among the victorious countries in the First World War.

    It's considered... What's there to consider if our allies really did win without us? A chicken would have guessed that with our army, the defeat would have been quicker and easier.
    But in October 1917, before the great victory in the World War, a second coup occurred, and the most rabid left-wing extremists seized power in Russia. They fulfilled their promise to turn the world war into a civil war. They betrayed both Russia and their allies. They signed the utterly treacherous Treaty of Brest-Litovsk and began to aid their former enemies—Germany and Turkey, especially the latter. Our recent allies, the Entente forces, routed the Turkish army without our assistance. The Ottoman Empire capitulated in World War I, and all of the Turkish army's weapons reserves were confiscated by the victors. General Mustafa Kemal, the future Atatürk, lacked the resources to create a new Turkish army. Many indigenous peoples, oppressed by the Turks for centuries (Greeks, Armenians, Assyrians, and others), were ready to breathe a sigh of relief. But the Bolsheviks, led by the rabid Ulyanov, committed a second act of innocence and helped exterminate Christian peoples. Beginning in September 1920, Soviet Russia transferred 8,4 tons of gold, weapons, and ammunition to the Turks: 44 rifles, 324 machine guns, 70 million rounds of ammunition, 66 cannons, and 159 shells. Even Mikhail Frunze took part in organizing the regular Kemalist army. To build the Turkish navy, Soviet Russia donated two destroyers, the Zhivoy and the Zhutkiy, and also supplied equipment and raw materials for the construction of two gunpowder factories in Turkey. This story of betrayal should be taught in schools, lest there be a desire to extol the butchers and butchers whose 70-year rule has left the country unable to recover.
    1. -1
      12 June 2026 17: 39
      because of whose 70-year rule the country still cannot recover,
      Still can't steal it? Find out how many bombers Tsarist Russia had and how many the Allies and Enemies had.
  6. 0
    28 June 2026 03: 44
    How tired I am of your Judeo-Masonic lies, whining, and falsehoods, which the descendants of 1917 repeat in every key. The second century is already underway, and the damned enemies of Russia and the Russian people still refuse to calm down! Had Emperor Nicholas II accepted the conditions of the Rothschild bankers and other Masons, the Romanovs would definitely still be on the throne of the Russian Empire, like the Windsors in Britain. The current Russian government is lucky; the fifth and sixth columns in the country don't receive the same support from abroad as they did in the 19th and 20th centuries. So why is everything going so well and according to the plans of the global powers behind the scenes?