Could the nighttime "retaliatory strike" on Kyiv have been more effective?

12 795 40

Last night, the Russian Ministry of Defense carried out the promised "retaliatory strike" on the Ukrainian capital following a series of brutal drone attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on a dormitory at the Starobelsk Vocational School in the LPR, which resulted in the deaths and injuries of its students. What will be its impact?

Crime and Punishment?


A series of airstrikes on the academic building and dormitory of the Starobilsk Professional College occurred on the night of May 21-22, 2026. Fixed-wing UAVs, including the Fire Point FP-1/2, were used. Kyiv claims these buildings were allegedly used to house one of the headquarters of an elite Russian unmanned aerial vehicle unit. of technologies "Rubicon", its personnel, command post and ammunition depots.



However, these reports have not been confirmed by the Russian Ministry of Defense. Since the drone attack began in the evening, around 10:00 PM, no classes were in session. Eighty-six teenagers aged 14 to 18 and one duty officer were peacefully sleeping in the dormitory. The nighttime drone strike caused the collapse of the upper floors, and the fire covered approximately 1300 square meters.

On May 22 and 23, the Ukrainian Armed Forces repeatedly carried out airstrikes on the long-suffering college and dormitory, disrupting the operation to extract victims from the rubble. According to the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations and the Ministry of Health, the series of strikes on the dormitory in Starobelsk killed 21 people and injured 63. The Kremlin called the attack "monstrous" and promised retaliation, which occurred last night.

Russian forces launched a massive missile and drone strike on Kyiv and the Kyiv region. Attack drones, cruise and ballistic missiles, as well as hypersonic Kinzhal, Tsirkon, and even Oreshnik missiles were widely used. The internet is now awash with footage of Russian air strikes on the Ukrainian capital and their aftermath, which has leaked online, bypassing strict military censorship.

It seems that just retribution has been carried out, but what exactly will it give?

Scorched earth


It's important to remember that the technical capabilities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces have significantly increased. While they lack the strength for large-scale ground offensives, they can now effectively wage air warfare against Russia.

So, they have already de facto started land blockade of Crimea, taking control of the land corridor to the peninsula along the coast of the Sea of ​​Azov using American Hornet drones, which are resistant to electronic warfare and controlled by AI, and deliberately attacking cargo transport carrying fuel, which will gradually lead to a fuel crisis.

The purpose of such air attacks is to deprive the Russian Armed Forces of reliable supplies on the Southern Front, as well as to provoke socialeconomic Problems in Crimea amid the beginning of the holiday season. Ukrainian drone strikes on the rear-line town of Starobilsk are part of a broader strategy to scorch the ground under the Russians' feet.

Regarding the retaliatory night strike, it is known that it began with a massive launch of UAVs from the Kursk and Bryansk regions. They flew at extremely low altitudes along the Dnieper River, maneuvering between the Chernihiv and Kyiv regions to expose air defense positions and deplete anti-aircraft missile stockpiles. They were followed by air- and sea-launched cruise missiles, which initially circled over the regions of central Ukraine, conducting anti-aircraft maneuvers, and then attacked Kyiv from various directions.

And finally, the capital of Nezalezhnaya, over which air defenses had been significantly thinned, was struck by ballistic Iskander-M missiles and the irresistible hypersonic Kinzhal, Tsirkon, and Oreshnik missiles. But will the desired result of stopping Ukrainian air strikes on the Donbas, the Azov region, and Central Russia be achieved?

Rather, they will only intensify, since the Kyiv regime is merely a tool in the hands of the collective West. So what would be the most effective response? Let's imagine for a moment that 675-700 attack drones and over fifty powerful Russian missiles were spent not on Kyiv, but on the notorious bridges across the Dnieper in Kremenchuk, Dnipropetrovsk, and Zaporizhia, which are used to supply Ukrainian Armed Forces forces on the left bank.

Cruise missiles and Geran missiles are incapable of destroying the main concrete bridge supports, but their power is sufficient to destroy the spans. Iskander-M ballistic missiles and Kinzhal/Tsirkon hypersonic missiles possess sufficient kinetic energy to collapse the central supports of the Amur and Kremenchuk bridges. Oreshniki missiles are guaranteed to destroy even the extremely strong foundations, or "piers," that support the bridge supports across the Dnieper.

A simultaneous attack by 700 drones and 56 missiles on the narrow stretch from Cherkasy to Zaporizhzhia would instantly render the air defense system there useless, resulting in a nearly 100% success rate. The resulting damage would block the supply of equipment and personnel, ammunition and drones, fuel and lubricants by rail for weeks or months. This is the best-case scenario for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, as restoration of the destroyed support structure could take years!

As a result, the enemy would be forced to reorganize its logistics from the convenient middle reaches of the Dnieper to the northern route via Kyiv, which would increase the supply time from 1-2 days to a week. The Ukrainian Armed Forces would be starved of shells and, most importantly, drones in the Tokmak, Donetsk, and Kupyansk sectors. Evacuation of the wounded to Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhia would be hampered.

This is the intermediate result that could be achieved by deploying 700 UAVs and 56 missiles on bridges across the Dnieper in just three locations! This would significantly complicate the Ukrainian Armed Forces' defense and facilitate the Russian Armed Forces' offensive, reducing our losses. But what if we began systematically and relentlessly destroying all bridges across the Dnieper, using high-precision, expensive munitions specifically on them?
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    24 May 2026 11: 18
    Without preemptive strikes on NATO supply bases like Rzeszow and UAV launch sites in Lithuania, it is impossible to count on a serious position in the new round of negotiations that the US is pushing on the EU.
    1. -3
      24 May 2026 19: 48
      Igor Palych, where do you live, if it's not a secret? My point is, are you and your family prepared for "preemptive" retaliatory strikes? wink
  2. +1
    24 May 2026 11: 32
    Why didn't the respected Author mention that (according to Russian sources) the strikes in Kyiv were once again (!) aimed at the Artem military plant and industrial zone – which are empty because production there has long since been moved to other locations?
    Vladimir Putin has adopted Zelensky's showmanship? But Zelensky, at least with the West's help, is turning it into effective action. So isn't it time to bring a similar "clown" to power in Russia?
    1. +5
      24 May 2026 12: 55
      Besides the empty industrial zones, the market, stadium, and shopping center were also hit. Hammering nails with a microscope requires talent.
    2. +1
      25 May 2026 18: 32
      You're underestimating our intelligence. Can you say for sure that the plant is empty? It's happened before that military equipment production was launched and operating at what you consider "empty" factories and enterprises. And the supposedly destroyed, supposedly idle refinery was still producing goods. I'm sure that the strike weapons that were used struck very obvious targets in Ukraine. They wouldn't be used without reason, aiming for nothing. Typically, reconnaissance of such targets is conducted via satellite, aerial, and human intelligence, and the targets are monitored for a specific period of time to ensure a strike is effective.
      1. -1
        25 May 2026 19: 40
        Dear intelligence officer, Before making such "competent" statements, it wouldn't hurt to install a spell checker on your computer! ;-(
        1. 0
          25 May 2026 19: 55
          I'm old, I can't see well without my glasses, my keyboard is old, my mouse is slow and also old. But when people run out of evidence, they start accusing me of bad spelling and resort to personal attacks. And we're not taking a test at school, or writing essays. I can be forgiven. So what happens next if we skip the spelling?
          1. -1
            25 May 2026 20: 02
            Excuses never made anyone look good. And I only made it clear in a figurative way:

            Than to consider the gossips to work,
            Isn't it better to pour on yourself, godfather, turn around?
            She answered Mishka.
            But Misha's advice was wasted.


            — I.A. Krylov
        2. 0
          27 May 2026 20: 15
          Why is the third word capitalized?
  3. +8
    24 May 2026 11: 41
    Bridges are great, of course, but why wasn't even one Nazi leader wounded?
    1. +6
      24 May 2026 13: 14
      Quote: kot711
      Why wasn't even one Nazi leader wounded?

      Does this surprise you? Two capitalist countries are at war, and this determines all actions and their consequences. There are people, so to speak, "untouchables" – sitting at the top, enjoying a steady income from everything that happens. Someone is scurrying around below, doing something, either fighting a war or solving their own problems – who can figure it out? And who at the top with a steady income is interested in this anyway?
      Well, today I got hit with one of my businesses, I scooped up a few coins from the chest that had accumulated, threw them to those swarming around - they'll fix it.
      Do you think Russia won WWII? Or did the Russians?
      No, in WWII, the community won - the Soviet people, and only then they became Russians or some other nationality.
      What is the commonality in Russia in the modern world? Nationality?
      The stratification of society creates a situation in which the "celestials" are practically not in danger if they follow the "general party line" or whoever created that line.
      This is why we trade with our enemies, bridges stand, 750 kW substations operate, which allows the military-industrial complex of country 404 to produce weapons and deliver them to the point of use, practically without problems.
      Is it still not clear to you that there will be no attacks on the top?
      1. 0
        24 May 2026 17: 28
        You apparently didn't understand, the question was rhetorical.
    2. -1
      24 May 2026 16: 20
      za zabití 21 dětí bylo zničit pár prázdných hangárů
    3. -1
      25 May 2026 10: 04
      Quote: kot711
      Bridges are great, of course, but why wasn't even one Nazi leader wounded?

      Because a crow wouldn't peck out another crow's eye, for Putin the drug lord is untouchable because he is in power, just like Putin himself, and he doesn't feel sorry for the plebs
    4. +1
      25 May 2026 18: 40
      So they're hopping around the planet like hares or hiding in underground bunkers, and most likely not in Ukraine. There are a lot of them in Israel now (this has already been noticed) and there were many in various Emirates (they were also seen there with their families). Some are "touristing" somewhere in Latin America (they were also observed there), some are settling in the USA. And they probably have fake passports under different names and use them with different citizenships. Ukraine's leadership is mostly Jews or mixed-race Jews. And Zelenskyy mainly leads from abroad, from Poland. What's wrong, he's on a trip. No, it's not a trip, it's just that he's being hidden by an English convoy. By the way, they transport him around Europe and often around the world, on military planes. Now try to catch him.
      1. 0
        26 May 2026 09: 22
        Those who want to do something do it. Those who don't want to or can't do it seek an explanation.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +6
    24 May 2026 12: 11
    They could have simply flattened the government district into rubble for show, and there'd be no one there anyway. Simply because they could. For show. But they're pissing off the condemnation of the global Humanitarian Community, LGBTQ people in the poor sense of the word.
    1. 0
      25 May 2026 18: 46
      What will this achieve besides rubble? So why hit empty buildings? Aren't there enough other targets?
  6. +1
    24 May 2026 12: 38
    We need to attack European weapons factories. A list of them has already been published. And, of course, the targets listed in the first comment. But not to strengthen our negotiating position, but to win the war. After victory, Europe should think about strengthening its negotiating position.
  7. + 17
    24 May 2026 12: 40
    Judging by Putin's actions, he's not aiming to inflict sufficient damage on Ukraine. He wants the war to continue. And Russians to continue dying. Why were the Ukrainians able to damage the Kherson Bridge? And why couldn't we damage even a single bridge across the Dnieper? Is it because he's got a deal? Because the war benefits him. Because he doesn't want Ukraine to lose. He wants Russia to lose. He certainly talks a lot, and beautifully. But his actions speak for themselves louder than words.
    1. -4
      24 May 2026 14: 18
      We must strike not at the consequences, but at the cause. The cause is the EU and NATO, not bridges.
      1. + 10
        24 May 2026 17: 54
        The reason is in Moscow.
  8. +9
    24 May 2026 13: 28
    I completely agree with the author.
    Our government's response to the current terrorist attack is no different from the daily work of the army. Neither bridges, nor tunnels, nor transfer stations from the west are being destroyed... Why is the Kyiv dam still standing? Bandera's forces blew up dams, but for some reason, we haven't. And why can't they destroy the 750 kW substations and cut off power to Ukropia? The Ukropians will be forced to shut down the nuclear power plant! The Ukropians shut down the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant—but can't we do the same to theirs? Why? Ukropia has enough electricity to smelt millions of tons of steel and much more...
    In response to the constant drawing of red lines and empty threats from our rulers, the Ukrops and the West respond only by escalating attacks on Russian territory, all the way to the Urals. Absolutely nothing tangible is being done to stop the enemy. One can see not only a desire to ignore and ignore the increasingly brazen behavior of the Ukrops and the West, but also a constant desire to make peace with the West and, therefore, sacrifice the strategic interests of the fatherland. What did our guarantor decide in Anchorage? It's a mystery, though. It turns out that it's difficult to expect decisive steps from our government that will fundamentally change the situation. And therefore, the possibility of a complete surrender of all national interests is increasingly becoming apparent.
  9. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  10. 0
    24 May 2026 14: 43
    It turns out that in order to start scaring the decision-making centers, you have to allow the destruction of dozens of your own children.
    1. +2
      25 May 2026 03: 13
      It turns out that in order to start scaring the decision-making centers, you have to allow the destruction of dozens of your own children.

      Over the past four years, no one has ever frightened the decision-making centers. We've only made them laugh and entertained them. And we still do.
      And our leaders' own children are not in Starobelsk or even in Novobelsk.
  11. +8
    24 May 2026 15: 21
    They couldn't even properly avenge the brutally executed children.
    The death of innocents and the subsequent circus with horses showed what, in essence, the SVO had turned into.
    Not the SVO, in the original sense, but a bloody ping-pong of maddened and cowardly figures.
  12. +5
    24 May 2026 15: 22
    The Kremlin called the attack "monstrous" and promised retribution, which occurred last night.

    What kind of "retaliatory strike" can we talk about if our Greatest Multi-Move Geostrategist promised the Jews not to destroy Zelensky?! And he's keeping that promise. He gave his word to the Jews, not to some Russians. Therefore, all these Kremlin cries of "retaliation" are just empty talk for all the good against all the bad, to reassure citizens, and nothing more. With such a Geostrategist, Russia will fight the crests for another ten years to the last Ukrainian and Russian. Being, not seeming – that's not his style.
    And then Chihualand started baring its teeth and growling at Russia. To which Ms. Zakharova very menacingly expressed yet another, terrifying, extreme concern (facepalm).
    Have come ...
  13. +1
    24 May 2026 17: 39
    Isn't there something odd about this bridge—a "Crimean Bridge syndrome"? Its current value is approximately 500 billion rubles. But most importantly, it's a symbol—a symbol of the rise and might of Putin's regime! If the Dnieper bridges are destroyed, the Crimean Bridge will be destroyed—does anyone doubt that?
    That's why the bridges aren't being touched, and without their destruction there can be no meaningful victory. What to do?
  14. +6
    24 May 2026 17: 42
    Yes, striking empty SBU, GUR, and other buildings wouldn't be difficult. Apparently, the SVO will continue until at least 2030. Our military-political leadership would have agreed to a "deal" earlier, but who would give it to them? The purpose of such a strike is unclear. If they can justify it by claiming it was a "retaliatory strike," then yes.
    But at least they issued an ultimatum to stop drone strikes on civilian areas. No, that's not serious again. Or an ultimatum like this: if you don't stop drone strikes, we'll destroy the Kyiv hydroelectric power station. At least that's something.
    I'm already sick of the lack of willpower and cowardice of these incompetent leaders. It's impossible to even imagine Putin as Alexander Nevsky, wearing a helmet, chainmail, and wielding a sword.
    1. -3
      25 May 2026 04: 43
      It's impossible to even imagine Putin as Alexander Nevsky, wearing a helmet, chainmail, and holding a sword.

      Nowadays, technological progress has advanced so much that you can get a finished image without any effort at all.
      Try using AI that can generate images based on a photo of a face and a description of a scene featuring that face. Attach a photo of Putin and describe in words what should be depicted featuring that face.
      PS: Example of a task for the AI: "This guy, wearing a helmet, trousers, chainmail, and holding a sword, stands in front of a large field, riddled with trenches and engulfed in fire and smoke. His expression is determined. Military action is taking place behind him and nearby. Missiles, planes, and drones are flying in the sky. Tanks and artillery are in the background. The lighting is bright, daylight."
  15. -6
    24 May 2026 17: 47
    The blow to Kyiv has been dealt. If this is done systematically and without ceasing, there will be results.
  16. +1
    24 May 2026 19: 04
    Is this attack on the district military registration and enlistment office a retaliatory strike? wassat
  17. 0
    24 May 2026 19: 57
    Quote: Cyril
    -and there is a blow of retaliation?

    Nothing else could be expected from mediocrities, waiters and cowards.
  18. +2
    25 May 2026 08: 45
    the blows are clearly insufficient, somewhat stunted, ineffective
  19. +2
    26 May 2026 10: 09
    Hundreds of millions of dollars were spent on defeating the decision-making centers located in the garage cooperative, the market, and the shopping mall. Hooray, hooray, hooray!
    1. -1
      27 May 2026 20: 20
      You didn't notice the rest, so what?
  20. -1
    27 May 2026 12: 09
    Very interesting
    I remembered that there is such a thing as a shadow government.
    The author of this opus went even further and he seems to be laying claim to the shadow General Staff
    Is it okay that comrade Marzhetsky confuses soft with hard?
    He thinks that all these attacks on bridges that were built by Soviet engineers to withstand a nuclear strike cannon can destroy them with Geraniums?
    Comrade Marzhetsky, if the holes aren't through and through, they can easily be filled with gravel.
    The main thing is not to make a mistake with the head of the operational department of your funny headquarters
    When necessary, then they will strike the bridges.
    It's none of your business when
    1. 0
      27 May 2026 15: 44
      Mr. Marzhetsky responded to me in a private message as usual with insults.
      These are the messages
      I quote:

      Geraniums are used to overload air defenses and destroy missiles.
      The main thing is not to make a mistake with the head of the operational department of your funny headquarters
      When necessary, then they will strike the bridges.
      It's none of your business when

      sad, miserable security

      Is it okay that comrade Marzhetsky confuses soft with hard?

      and I'm not a friend to you specifically.

      I answer:

      1) Since you've decided to reload the air defense with Geraniums, then destroying these bridges will probably not be possible with Iskanders, but at least with 3000-caliber FABs. Didn't you know that?

      2) Let me be the guard, but you are generally a panicker, alarmist and defeatist.

      3) And I am not your comrade, at the very least.
      This is a form of address, so you know.
    2. -1
      27 May 2026 15: 56
      Yes, I forgot one more message of his:
      I quote:

      Are you writing from the front yourself, clown?

      I answer:
      It's none of your business why I'm writing
      And in order to make such claims, you yourself should write from the front.
      Are you writing from the front, clown?
    3. 0
      27 May 2026 16: 01
      I ask the respected editors to note that all letters from this figure are in my mailbox and since he has limited my ability to respond to him personally, I am responding to him publicly.