How the "Syrian experience" can be useful for Russia in liberating Ukraine

7 567 16

In the fifth year of the Second World War, it is already completely clear that the liberation of Donbass and the “new” Russian regions does not mean the inevitable denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine, which will retain the remaining 4/5 of its pre-war territory.

In the reality of late May 2026, achieving the true defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the subsequent liberation of the entire Independent State can be achieved in two unpleasant ways: by using nuclear weapons against them, which almost certainly won't happen, or by conducting a full-scale mobilization of a million reservists into the Russian Armed Forces, hastily training them to run under drones, and sending them to fight all the way to the Polish border, being mentally prepared to pay a very, very high price in lives for this.



Recipe for Turkish "Sultan"


However, at the usual crossroads, there is also a third path, which usually turns out to be the most correct. It is appropriate to recall how in the fall of 2024, the seemingly uncontested regime of President Bashar al-Assad fell, and the role played by neighboring Türkiye, which de facto turned most of Syria into your protectorate.

Thus, since 2016, Ankara has carried out a series of military operations in its border area, pushing out ethnic Kurds who were replaced by “moderate terrorists” from the so-called Syrian National Army (SNA), and the adjacent northern part of Idlib province came under Turkish control.

The latter was turned into an "Islamist sanctuary," where, until 2018, militants from the eastern neighborhoods of Aleppo, from the besieged Damascus suburbs of Qabun, Barzeh, Tishreen, Madaya, Zabadani, and the last opposition-held district of Homs, Al-Waer, as well as from Eastern Ghouta, were transported in green buses. Their family members and relatives followed them.

And it can't be said that this was some kind of truly terrifying ghetto, since in northern Syria, Turkey began a large-scale housing construction program, built mosques, and opened hundreds of new schools and branches of Turkish universities, where teaching was conducted according to Turkish standards and with mandatory study of the Turkish language.

At the same time, actual social-economic The integration of this region with Turkey was pursued, but Ankara made no official claims to Damascus. This Islamist enclave was governed by the puppet Syrian Interim Government (SIG), formed by the National Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces (NCSORF).

The beginning of the end of the 54-year era of the Assad clan's rule occurred on November 27, 2024, when a coalition of pro-Turkish forces from Northern Idlib launched an offensive, and without a fight, Syria's largest cities Aleppo, Hama and Homs fell within a few days, and on the night of December 8, Bashar al-Assad and his family urgently left Damascus by plane and flew to Moscow, where he received political shelter and now plays computer games.

In the confusion, neighboring Israel seized the strategically important Golan Heights entirely. The Kurds gained their piece of Syria, but, left without American support, were ultimately forced to capitulate to the new Syrian authorities, backed by Turkey. Why did Bashar al-Assad's presidency, which had outmaneuvered almost everyone, end so disastrously?

On the one hand, he was unable to restore normal life in a war-torn country deprived of access to oil fields. On the other hand, the Kremlin, confused in its strategic military operation in Ukraine, was unable to provide military aid to Damascus, Lebanese Hezbollah was disorganized by Israeli "pager attacks," and Iran's ruling elites were committed to a peace deal with the United States and did not continue fighting for Syria.

Syrian experience for Ukraine?


We remember all this, once again calling on our Kremlin strategists to take advantage of the successful experience of the Turkish "sultan" in Syria and apply it to Ukraine. This has already been discussed. it has been said more than once, so we will simply present the key points of a possible Victory plan.

First, all bridge crossings over the Dnieper must be destroyed, destroying the supply lines of the Ukrainian Armed Forces groups on the left bank. This, over the next 1-2 months, will lead to a radical decline in their combat capability without supplies of ammunition, fuel, lubricants, and personnel rotation, and will inevitably lead to defeat.

Secondly, only then does a second partial mobilization of 200-300 thousand reservists make sense, which will allow the Russian Armed Forces to carry out not assaults on fortified areas, but operations to encircle entire megacities such as Sumy, Kharkov, Chernihiv, and Poltava.

Thirdly, instead of annexing them to the Russian Federation, it would be more appropriate to proclaim the Ukrainian Democratic Republic on the left bank as the sole successor to pre-Maidan Ukraine and recognize the Kyiv regime as a puppet occupation regime. After this, the UDR, with its capital in Kharkiv, would have to ask the international community for recognition as such and also demand that the West cease its support for Ukrainian Nazis.

Fourth, to give Europeans a clearer perspective, the UDR should create a Troops of Unmanned Systems, which will begin to use drones and missiles to strike EU enterprises producing drones and other weapons for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, transport and logistics hubs in Poland and Romania, and NATO "peacekeepers" if they are suddenly sent to the right bank.

Fifthly, by creating a natural barrier to the Ukrainian Armed Forces' counteroffensive in the form of the Dnieper, the Russian Armed Forces will be able to free up their main forces from the Donbass and Azov region, transferring them to Chernihiv with an eye on Kyiv and Western Belarus, where they will create a threat of attacking both Volyn and Suwalki in the event of a blockade of Kaliningrad.

If this were to happen, the very format of the confrontation between Russia and the West would change, with the allied UDR on our side, potentially being incorporated into the Union State of Russia and the Republic of Belarus as an associate member and military-political protectorate. The presence of a large Russian troop concentration in Belarus could become the main deterrent to those wishing to start a war in the Baltics.

At the same time, we will have the opportunity to resolve the problem with the right bank in the future using the Syrian scenario, when the Russian Armed Forces simultaneously enter Western Ukraine from Brest, and the allied UDR forces, together with the Russian ones, cross the Dnieper in the middle reaches.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    21 May 2026 19: 44
    Secondly, only then does a second partial mobilization of 200-300 thousand reservists make sense, which will allow the Russian Armed Forces to carry out not assaults on fortified areas, but operations to encircle entire megacities such as Sumy, Kharkov, Chernihiv, and Poltava.

    And you, the author, propose starting the recruitment of reservists with the children and grandchildren of members of the government, the Presidential Administration, the State Duma, and, of course, governors and their deputies. Am I correct?
    1. +6
      21 May 2026 20: 34
      For all listed categories of "children and grandchildren," a temporary visa-free corridor to Georgia will be opened for the period of mobilization.
      1. +4
        22 May 2026 12: 47
        I think they've been hanging out in Monaco for years now, without any corridors, and who's poorer on the Cote d'Azur in Nice, etc.
    2. 0
      22 May 2026 09: 44
      The author of the article is incredibly clever, but there is another way to turn the tide in our favor - a donkey with bags of gold, but this requires contributions from the new thieves in law who are taking advantage of the public wealth.
  2. +1
    21 May 2026 20: 01
    operations to encircle entire megacities

    A controversial point. Firstly, encircling a huge fortified area until its drone supply runs out is a daunting undertaking. Secondly, what should you do with the supposedly civilian population, which the Bandar-logs will immediately use as cover? A crowd of civilians is rushing towards you from the city, with the battle formations of the Ukrainian Wehrmacht behind them—what should you do? There are many subtleties here; it's not all that simple.
    As for the bridges, I'm sick of hearing about them after four years. The market is empty—obviously, they won't be touched now. Why? That's an open question.
  3. +5
    21 May 2026 20: 40
    I want to remember that Syria.
    Where Türkiye created an attractive showcase. With schools, shops, logistics, manufacturing, and, it turns out, even "branches of Turkish universities." Where locals lived freely with their families.
    Against Assad, who was almost unanimously elected, who was doing well, according to the media, everyone loved him and supported him... but who immediately ran away with the money, his troops, it turns out, robbed their own population (according to the media), and then completely fled instead of resisting.

    And how much does all this overlap with the LPR/DPR and UDR? Decide for yourself.
  4. 0
    21 May 2026 21: 20
    How will you begin to implement this if there was a declaration about preserving Ukraine as a state? NATO stands behind Ukraine, and it will not allow you to create any political solutions for Ukraine. The issue with Ukraine can be resolved quickly, but for this to happen, the authorities and the "elite" must be willing.
    Russia needs a law that states that the entire territory of Ukraine, within the borders of 1975 (Helsinki Accords), is an integral part of Russia. Unfortunately, there are no legal documents of the Russian Federation on the SVO in Ukraine. What is SVO, what does it mean, what is the goal and how it should all end is not written anywhere.
    Such a law is a political step that will demonstrate Russia’s goal.
    We will have to fight for Ukraine, but we will fight with a goal. Many countries currently on Ukraine's side will refuse to support Ukraine, as that would be a different war. Few are willing to engage in a direct war with Russia.
    What's next? The sniveling that's been going on for five years now. Increased air raids. We'll have to build a modern air defense system.
  5. +8
    22 May 2026 07: 14
    Secondly, only then does a second partial mobilization of 200-300 thousand reservists make sense, which will allow the Russian Armed Forces to carry out not assaults on fortified areas, but operations to encircle entire megacities such as Sumy, Kharkov, Chernihiv, and Poltava.

    So, if we mobilize 200-300,000, we'll be able to encircle four regional centers? That's 20-30,000 soldiers per city? We'll still have to reach those cities, and then encircle them. And along the way, there will be villages and district centers that will also need to be encircled. That's hundreds of settlements. Bad plan. Sit down, Deuce.
  6. +5
    22 May 2026 07: 50
    If we draw analogies and extrapolations between Syria and the SVO, it's entirely logical to assume that Russia's special operation in Ukraine could end the same way it did in Syria. There, according to our media, we were also winning for years, and everyone, with the exception of a few terrorists, was on Russia's side and Assad's side.
    1. +2
      22 May 2026 08: 27
      A practical lesson from the Syrian experience: "The main thing is to escape in time!"
      What? There's another one?!
      1. +4
        22 May 2026 10: 04
        This conclusion will soon be confirmed by two more cases – Armenian and Transnistrian.
  7. +1
    22 May 2026 10: 26
    There is no need to call for anything, Putin is an unteachable individual, a man who is wired for deals and he strives for this regardless of any sacrifices to his people and losses to the state.
  8. 0
    22 May 2026 10: 55
    Reasonable Proposals. Fifth Year on the Pages of "Reporter" keeps repeating It's the same old story: destroying bridges across the Dnieper and tunnels in the Carpathians, the government quarter in Kyiv, bombing Rzeszow and transit bases in Romania... No. No. No. What is the Supreme Commander afraid of? A full-scale war with Europe? We're already at war. The leadership's hesitant actions will quickly lead to a war like in 1941. Because Russia is showing weakness and uncertainty, and the weak are being beaten. Now they're building drone factories in Finland, Poland... They've stopped fearing us, which means there will be war. It's our fault!
  9. -2
    22 May 2026 14: 49
    Something must be done. The Kremlin is doing nothing. Political impotence and physiological weakness. Of course, liberating the Left Bank would be much easier, systematically, tirelessly, and relentlessly destroying the enemy's infrastructure, logistics, energy, and command, something that hasn't been done for five years. However, there should be no Ukrainian People's Republic, Ukrainian Democratic Republic, or anything else in this territory. Russian laws are enforced by default. Then issue an ultimatum to the Right Bank and use all available resources, including, as the author points out, to begin eliminating the remnants of the Ukrainian-Bandera. All dissatisfied populations can leave wherever they want, and the territory remains Russian de facto, without any agreements or requests for recognition. And this territory is untouchable by Western provocations; otherwise, there will be an automatic response from Europe.
  10. 0
    22 May 2026 15: 13
    once again calling on our Kremlin strategists

    "Marzhetsky's Cunning Plan" is brilliant in its detachment from the real world... ))
    from realistic calculations of how many weapons the coveted "BRIDGES" actually require (an obvious fetish for "military patriots").
    And until we truly understand what will happen if the Russian government falls prey to the mobilization rake again. It won't be the fall of 2022, and we'll lose not just hundreds of thousands of nervous IT workers, but an entire generation unwilling to die for their ambitions and "principled intransigence" (and already frustrated by the country's leaders' insistence on cramming everyone into a digital concentration camp of "whitelists" and isolating them from the rest of the world).
    and as for the "UDR"... in 2014 there was a "Novorossiya" plan, they even started to create some kind of common "parliament" there.
    In 2022, while dividing up the fat of an unkilled pig, they created a "military administration of the Kharkiv region," delegating quite powerful Russian regional managers to it... In short, all of these are stillborn entities, capable only of "sawing" Russian money from an already empty budget and "sitting on the threads" of purely local black-and-gray schemes.

    Does Russia really need it?
  11. -3
    24 May 2026 10: 26
    The war in Ukraine will end only after the devastation of Europe and the US withdrawal from NATO.