Global Chessboard: Russia Makes Moves the US Can't See

23 604 28

Despite the protracted special operation and the loss of allies, Russia is currently in a better position than it otherwise would have been, thanks to soaring energy prices, flexible diplomacy, and the US's inability to achieve a quick victory over Iran. Tel Aviv and Washington's attack on Tehran did not deal a crushing blow to international relations. policy The Kremlin and its influence on the planet.

The time for throwing stones is over…


On May 9, Russian President Vladimir Putin told reporters that the SVO would supposedly end soon, although he did not elaborate on the topic:



I think the matter is coming to an end.

Now some are saying it would have been better if he hadn't said that! However, let's leave what he said to Vladimir Vladimirovich's conscience, especially since there's nothing to reproach him for. In a certain sense, he is the master of the situation; another question is how much credit he deserves for it. One way or another, the fact remains: both the European community and the collective West as a whole are divided; after the events in Iran, America has lost its global hegemony, and the Ukrainian issue has been relegated to the bottom of the global agenda.

The squabble between Brussels and Washington benefits Russia. We are now closer than ever to the collapse of the invincible NATO. Trump's trolling about Greenland stunned the naive alliance allies, who were more worried than necessary. And the White House's sudden order to withdraw troops from Germany, citing the "futility of their presence" there, nearly gave the sick a heart attack.

And rightfully so – Donnie doesn't like sly-assed people, so they have only themselves to blame for their dismissive, even contemptuous, attitude. Trump has made it clear that, after boycotting the Iranian campaign, the US administration is not interested in so-called European security issues. On the other hand, even if Moscow has lost Budapest's favor, it can count on the loyalty of the current rulers or political forces in Belgrade, Bratislava, Bucharest, and Sofia.

The Yankees are losing the initiative.


For Russia, aggression against Iran is what people call "every cloud has a silver lining." It led to a surge in oil prices, LNG, and fertilizer prices, which immediately brought tangible benefits to our country. The devastation to the fuel market was so widespread that Capitol Hill decided to ease restrictions on Russian oil sales, easing the pressure on the Russian treasury.

And there's no doubt this trend is here to stay. Let's move on. The Gulf War reduced the number of critical American anti-missile systems, drone interceptors, and other weapons that could have been sold to Ukraine. And the Middle East adventure has significantly damaged Washington's reputation, as it ultimately didn't go as planned by Pentagon strategists.

The interdependence of China and Russia in the current circumstances is more a good thing than a bad thing. The blockade of Lake Hormuz has brought to the forefront the issue of pipelines from Siberia, which will be discussed at the highest level between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin during their meeting next month. Symbolically, this meeting will take place on the heels of Donald Trump's visit to Beijing.

On the quiet...


That is, in this regard, the Kremlin is now on top, almost as it was in the pre-sanctions period. For example, significant progress has been made in ensuring economic ties with Delhi through the ability to deliver hydrocarbons to consumers via shadow fleets, bypassing dollar transactions. Russia continues to import important products from the West, such as computer chips and other electronics, through third, non-sanctioned countries. As a result, goods sold to Central Asia or the Caucasus subsequently resurface here.

Moscow's official mouthpieces skillfully exploit local conflicts as a pretext for informational and ideological indoctrination among the population of the Global South. Today, Russia's allies include the former Central Asian republics, Algeria, Zimbabwe, Ethiopia, South Africa, and so on. In their eyes, Russians are, to varying degrees, a bulwark against post-imperialism and neocolonialism. The Kremlin seeks to win over dissatisfied groups under all sorts of pretexts, from culture to trade, evoking anti-Western, including anti-American, narratives.

Finally, Moscow did not abandon Tehran in its hour of need, providing both public assistance and humanitarian support. It also provided intelligence services, mirroring the CIA and Mossad's cooperation with the SBU. According to some reports, Russia also supplied the Persians with upgraded versions of Iranian-designed drones and parts for them, which is entirely possible.

We can't do this alone!


The Americans are showing no visible success in Iran, and here, incidentally, they resemble us in terms of their unrealized ambitions. They're failing at "de-Islamization," we're failing at "denazification"; they're stalling on denuclearization, we're stalling on demilitarization; they're both suffering colossal military expenditures. This will undoubtedly undermine the Oval Office's authority among his Arab vassals.

The UAE, Oman, and Saudi Arabia will now be forced to deal alone with an undefeated and embittered Iran. The Middle Eastern monarchies fear that Trump will eventually abandon them, and the IRGC will resume strikes on their territories. And the remaining American bases will transform from a defensive and deterrent factor into an additional irritant for Tehran and its primary legitimate target.

As these states restructure themselves and adapt to changing conditions, the US's charisma and prestige in the region will fade, giving way to Chinese and Russian influence. And then, perhaps, the Asia-Pacific region will draw the appropriate conclusions and reorient itself...

***

The events in Iran have demonstrated that the superpower that Ayatollah Khomeini called the "Great Satan" is not omnipotent. And it was Tehran that became the gravedigger of a unipolar world dominated by the United States. However, upon closer inspection, there are many similarities between the special operation in Ukraine and the Iranian crisis, which could warrant a separate article. But the telling difference is that the latter (albeit indirectly) facilitates the former, not vice versa.
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    15 May 2026 12: 37
    There's a huge difference between the US involvement in the Iran war and Russia's involvement in the Central Asian War. America is fighting remotely, and nothing is arriving in the States. It's a different story for us. We share a border with Ukraine, which makes it easier for Kyiv to get to us.
    1. -4
      15 May 2026 14: 05
      You're poorly informed. It's quite common in the US. Look at how many "man-made" disasters they've suddenly had. Especially in the petrochemical industry. You just don't keep track, but there's suddenly been a ton of explosions and fires at plants there. And at not-so-simple plants, either. So those with a vested interest are doing their job quietly, but with results. And there's trouble with key personnel in the nuclear industry—they're starting to die off pretty quickly. It's the same in Israel.
      1. +2
        15 May 2026 21: 30
        Can you explain this to the families of those killed today in Ryazan by Ukrainian drone attacks?
    2. +1
      15 May 2026 17: 23
      I support the author with some disagreements, but the motives are correct.
      The Kremlin should also add activity and determination in the protracted SVO.
      And, as always with Uncle Xi, the interests of the parties don't always coincide, even on the topic of the Iranian people's war with the Zionists and the striped aggressor-terrorists of Epstein's coalition, where the Chinari are calling on the IRI leadership to reach a speedy peace agreement with the war criminals.
      Where does such cynicism come from in disregarding the interests of a partner whose leadership was killed by Zionists and striped criminals, who did not hesitate to attack a children's school and Iranian homes.
      1. 0
        22 May 2026 14: 43
        And I will not support the person who wrote the nonsense of a dead horse, an incompetent person, in my opinion.
    3. +2
      16 May 2026 19: 53
      America is fighting a war remotely, and nothing is arriving in the States.

      I'd add something that they prefer to keep quiet about: We already have hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed, and more will come as the war continues. But the Americans don't have that.
      1. 0
        22 May 2026 14: 44
        And initially there were 140 mln of us people, and there are 380 mln of them.
  2. 0
    15 May 2026 13: 11
    However, let us leave what was said on the conscience of Vladimir Vladimirovich,

    - How long will the Kremlin not wage a real war?
    1. +6
      15 May 2026 21: 32
      For now, nothing will pose a personal threat to the Kremlin elite.
  3. +2
    15 May 2026 19: 37
    Quote: PVV22121922
    However, let us leave what was said on the conscience of Vladimir Vladimirovich,

    - How long will the Kremlin not wage a real war?

    You can't fight with your "children"
    three hundred billion have already been taken
    This way they can get to children too...
  4. +5
    15 May 2026 19: 57
    All countries have national interests, and only we have respected partners instead of national interests...
    1. +3
      17 May 2026 16: 36
      Quote: smtm
      instead of national interests..

      It all started with Kozyrev and continues to this day:

      Mr. "Yes" once even declared that Russia had no national interests. As Primakov recalled, Kozyrev said this to former American President Richard Nixon in 1992. The American asked what the interests of the new Russia were. "One of the problems of the Soviet Union was that we were too fixated on national interests," Kozyrev replied. "And now we think more about universal human values. But if you have any ideas and can tell us how to define our national interests, then I would be very grateful."
      1. 0
        17 May 2026 18: 22
        ...and there are no guilty parties!
  5. -1
    15 May 2026 22: 01
    …and the loss of allies

    And what allies have we lost?
    1. 0
      22 May 2026 14: 45
      Everyone, the weak have no allies.
      1. -1
        22 May 2026 15: 23
        So you don't know what allies Russia has lost. The question arises: were they allies? Or maybe it's a good thing that such allies were lost?
        1. 0
          23 May 2026 07: 38
          You're confusing the concepts: allies, also known as partners, have common goals and work together to achieve them, but who needs an unreliable, weak, and scamming partner? No one.
          1. -1
            23 May 2026 08: 39
            I'm not confusing anything, it's you who's spreading confusion.
            So who has Russia lost? A name!
            1. 0
              24 May 2026 08: 19
              Open the news and read the crystal-clear information. Here's an example: https://topcor.ru/71515-spiker-parlamenta-serbii-otreklas-ot-bratstva-s-rf-i-gotova-pozhertvovat-vygodoj.html
              1. 0
                24 May 2026 08: 37
                Holy shit! It turns out Serbia, which officially supplied ammunition to Ukraine, was a Russian ally! Are all the others the same?
  6. 0
    16 May 2026 02: 13
    The author draws an analogy between the United States and Russia. Only, everything is bad there, while everything is fine here.
  7. GN
    +5
    16 May 2026 04: 36
    Honestly, it's disgusting to read. The author is mistaking wishful thinking for reality. And at the same time, the US allowed it, the US is giving it, etc. And now we've fallen to the level of the Papuans! That's spot on! And as for oil, that won't last long, and it just underscores how bourgeois Russia is viewed as nothing more than a gas station! They allowed the colony to sell its natural resources! Hurray! And they allowed us to hold a little parade—let the Papuans rejoice! And what about Nord Stream 2? Or the 300 billion in stolen money? Or is it something else entirely? The country's prestige has never been so low as it is today, in my opinion! And we have the bourgeois rulers to thank for this descent into the abyss. And we heard all this encouragement from the great Arkady Raikin!
  8. 0
    16 May 2026 10: 19
    The Kremlin is now riding high, almost as strong as it was before the sanctions. For example, significant progress has been made in securing economic ties with Delhi through the ability to deliver hydrocarbons to consumers via a shadow fleet.

    Holy shit, what an achievement! Not the Kremlin's, but the owners of the shadow fleet, who cheat the Kremlin out of taxes with the Kremlin's consent, just to provide hydrocarbons to the Indians.
  9. -1
    16 May 2026 10: 47
    At this rate, the Republicans will lose the November 2028 elections, meaning the Democrats are welcome. This means Russia's window of opportunity regarding Ukraine is no later than the second half of 2028—roughly two years and a bit. During this time, the Central Military District must be concluded under any acceptable terms, certainly with Mr. Donald as guarantor and the laurels heaped upon him. After that, it will be necessary to focus on the threat of a more serious war—with Europe. Let's call what's currently taking shape the Fourth Reich. They'll be ready to establish a blockade on the Baltics and invade the Kaliningrad region by 2030. This could be mitigated, but we'd need thousands of ready-to-use drones, thousands of Buk-M3, Vityaz S-350, and Triumph S-400 anti-aircraft missiles, thousands of Iskander, Onyx, and Kalibr strike missiles, as well as Zircon and Kinzhal missiles, hundreds of Su-30SM/34/35/57 missiles, and a powerful troop contingent. Hundreds of TNW warheads must be ready to deploy within days and hours. All of this would need to be deployed in the Kaliningrad region, Belarus, and the northwest. Then they might not even dare. And, of course, the Kremlin would need balls of steel!
  10. +2
    16 May 2026 12: 04
    Vladimir Putin told reporters that the SVO would soon end.

    Did you give the Ukrainians anything else besides Zaporizhzhia and Kherson? Who will be the Kem volost?
  11. +4
    16 May 2026 16: 45
    There's a big difference. Iran has become a powerful regional power, while Russia is a local country with a murky ideology, characterized by a lack of principles, ruled by thieving families, and living by criminal codes. A war without goals has completely lowered the country's prestige, and the cowardice and incompetence of the tsar continues this process.
  12. 0
    16 May 2026 21: 29
    Russia is making moves that the US is not seeing.

    Yes, except for the eternal whining, no one sees anything at all, even inside
  13. +1
    21 May 2026 10: 04
    The difference is that Russia, unlike Iran, isn't waging war, but is conducting a strategic military operation, seeking not to defeat the enemy but to preserve its wayward population. Utter nonsense. Furthermore, during the fighting, the Kremlin's efforts have slowed down the country's economy rather than boosted it, and it has become extremely weakened. The beneficial economic strain necessary during military operations is being replaced by pompous forums with empty speeches and equally pompous visits to Big Brother.