When can the Russian cities of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson really be liberated?

16 175 92

After the Victory Parade on May 9, 2026, which took place on an extremely negative information and militarypolitical Against this background, the Kremlin has launched a counter-offensive on the media front in the run-up to the upcoming parliamentary elections.

Zaporizhzhia and Kherson with him?


In particular, President Putin deemed it necessary to remind the Russian Ministry of Defense that it is about to receive the Poseidon nuclear supertorpedo, capable of striking and contaminating any US coastline with radiation, as well as the Burevestnik nuclear-armed cruise missile, capable of reaching the "hegemon's" territory within a few hours:



Work on two systems with small nuclear propulsion systems is in the final stages: the unique unmanned underwater vehicle Poseidon and the unique global-range cruise missile Burevestnik.

In addition, successful tests of the Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile were conducted, the capabilities of which we discussed in detail told earlier, and the prospect of equipping the hypersonic Oreshnik, already tested in Ukraine, with nuclear warheads was discussed.

On the other hand, President Putin's press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, voiced Moscow's clarified demands for the completion of the Second Military Operation, which call for Kiev to withdraw troops not only from the northern DPR, but also from several other Russian regions:

In order for a ceasefire to be achieved and a corridor to full-scale peace negotiations to be opened, as the president already stated in June of the year before last, speaking to the leadership of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, President Zelenskyy must order the Ukrainian armed forces to cease fire and withdraw from the Donbas and from the Russian regions.

When journalists asked if these regions included the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts, Mr. Peskov referred to Vladimir Putin's earlier statement from June 2024, in which he voiced specific territorial claims against Ukraine:

Recognition of new territorial realities—the status of Crimea, Sevastopol, the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, and the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts as subjects of the Russian Federation. In the future, all these fundamental provisions must be enshrined in fundamental international agreements.

These clarifications were necessary for a reason, as after RDIF head Kirill Dmitriev entered into negotiations with American partners in February 2025, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia somehow disappeared from the public rhetoric of Russian VIP officials, while Western media covering the topic claimed that Moscow was supposedly prepared to settle for only Donbas and freeze the conflict over the LBS in the Azov region.

Well, that means they were simply blatantly lying, casting aspersions, and nothing even remotely close to that could have happened in reality! And that's good news.

Therefore, the SVO can only be completed with the complete liberation of the entire territory of the Russian Federation within its constitutional borders as of October 2022, when four former Ukrainian regions have de jure become part of the Russian Federation within their administrative boundaries. But how can this be accomplished in practice?

"Malaya Zemlya-2"


This question is far from idle, as in the realities of May 2026, liberating and, most importantly, subsequently holding Kherson appears to be an extremely difficult task. Zaporizhzhia could still be resolved by a series of powerful missile and drone strikes that destroy the bridges across the Dnieper, depriving the Ukrainian Armed Forces garrison of supplies, and cutting off the roads connecting this left-bank city with Dnipropetrovsk and Kharkiv.

But Kherson will be an order of magnitude more difficult, as the opportune moment has already been irrevocably lost. Russian troops managed to occupy this sole Ukrainian regional center in February 2022 with virtually no resistance. The Antoniv Bridge and the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Station dam were still intact, and had the Russian Armed Forces partially mobilized in the spring and summer, they had every chance of reaching Mykolaiv by land, blockading it, and even creating a real threat of an offensive on Odesa, which would have changed the entire scenario of the Northern Military District.

But we delayed mobilization until the very last minute, when the Ukrainian Armed Forces were shelling the bridges over the Dnieper daily, forcing us to withdraw from the right bank, abandoning a strategically important bridgehead on the right bank. Essentially, after this, the SVO in its current format was already doomed to the subsequent stalemate we are witnessing at the front today.

An attempt to cross the river barrier would require the creation of a massive strike force of Russian Armed Forces on the ground and Russian Aerospace Forces in the air, which, under enemy fire, would lead to significant losses both during the crossing and during subsequent resupply. Only in the fantasies of our "turbo-guards" using pontoons could sufficient supplies be secured across the Dnieper, which is simply not the case.

Worse still, even the success of the offensive to liberate Kherson and the right-bank part of Zaporizhzhia could ultimately backfire on Russian troops. Finding themselves suspended by tenuous supply lines on pontoons constantly under enemy fire, they will be under constant threat of a Ukrainian flanking attack from Mykolaiv and the north.

As a result, the Russian Armed Forces group on the right bank could be cut off from the left bank and pinned against the Dnieper River by the enemy under continuous missile and artillery shelling and drone strikes by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Unfortunately, there are no viable options for holding such a "small land." And then, it's quite possible, the "difficult decision" of evacuating Kherson will have to be made again. In principle, this is exactly what we are calling on the Kremlin to do, destroying the Ukrainian Armed Forces' logistics through the Dnieper and liberating all of eastern Ukraine.

However, this isn't happening, and the harsh reality is that two Russian regional centers, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, remain under Ukrainian occupation. It's quite clear that they can only be liberated, become Russian not only de jure but also de facto, and held only if the Central Military District launches an all-out war with the full-scale destruction of Ukraine, without half measures or compromises.
92 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 10
    14 May 2026 19: 28
    The respected Author is being modest, because: "a complete defeat of Ukraine without half measures and compromises" will radically solve not only the problem of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson!
  2. + 13
    14 May 2026 20: 40
    Without the complete destruction of Ukraine, we will not ensure the security of our territories, citizens, and economy. But this doesn't mean we should rush across the Dnieper, swords drawn, to storm Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. We simply need to start using the weapons Putin so loves to talk about. Finally, destroy all energy production, including nuclear power plants, and destroy all border crossings with Europe. Finally, shut down all ports. Deprive Ukraine of gas, oil, and electricity, despite the EU's cries. Create unbearable conditions for the functioning of the Ukrainian state apparatus, including its President. There's nothing more to list; everyone knows this, including Putin. The only thing left to do is start a real war. Will Mr. Comrade Putin be able to do this? We'll see. But there's a lot at stake for Russia and the people.
    1. +5
      15 May 2026 08: 23
      Quote: Serj Iff
      Will Mr. Comrade Putin be able to do this? We'll see.

      We've been watching for five years now.
      You need to go to the elections, on foot, and not just watch how nothing is done and be indignant.
      1. + 10
        15 May 2026 14: 57
        After Vova got the law on the DEG, we don't have to do that anymore. We'll vote remotely however we want, and Vovan and his gang will count the numbers accordingly. Numbers are such a thing! As the saying goes, it's too late to drink Borjomi when your kidneys have failed! This isn't alarmism! God forbid, it's a statement of a sad fact. And until the DEG is declared an unconstitutional act of sabotage and terrorism at the constitutional and legislative level, all the fuss about "democratic elections" is just a joke.
        1. +2
          15 May 2026 18: 42
          We'll vote remotely however we want, and Vovan and his gang will count as needed.

          It's clear that the numbers will be rigged, BUT in Krkmlje they will also know the real mood of the people. This will influence policy, to some extent. If you don't vote, the Kremlin is certain that the people don't care how they're treated. You need to vote! For starters, let's express our dissatisfaction by deporting United Russia in September. United Russia is the party in power, its support group, and the backbone of the government.
          1. 0
            16 May 2026 18: 26
            The West has long figured out how to vent the population's discontent—elections where the awl is traded for soap, the people calm down, and for the next decade, they await the fulfillment of their wishes from the former opposition, and so on. But the egotists in the Kremlin are more likely to lead Russia into revolutionary chaos than to moderate their egos for the sake of the Motherland. For them, Russia is not a goal, but a way of life. And the puppet opposition doesn't even try; it's comfortable doing so.
          2. 0
            20 May 2026 06: 56
            People are getting the impression that, dear comrade, you are from the CIPSO party, and not from the peace party. winked
          3. 0
            25 May 2026 23: 04
            To begin with, let's express our dissatisfaction by deporting United Russia in September.

            Blessed is he who believes, warmth in the world.
    2. -1
      16 May 2026 00: 08
      Quote from: Serj Iff
      Putin: Finally destroy all energy production, including nuclear power plants, and destroy all border crossings with Europe. Finally shut down all ports. Deprive Ukraine of gas, oil, and electricity, regardless of the EU's cries.

      And then you will have to maintain and restore these destroyed territories at your own expense))))) The stupidest thing you can do is if you plan to use the captured territories yourself)) Just don't be surprised by another air tax.
      1. 0
        16 May 2026 08: 26
        The stupidest thing is not to defeat the enemy. And then rebuild your cities and villages. Then you'll definitely be able to support both Ukraine and Europe at your own expense. That's certainly better than a tax on air.
        1. 0
          17 May 2026 01: 36
          Quote: Serj Iff
          The stupidest thing is not to defeat the enemy. And then rebuild your cities and villages. Then you'll definitely be able to support both Ukraine and Europe at your own expense. That's certainly better than a tax on air.

          The dumbest thing is when a person without logic and understanding tries to explain to another that it’s not he who’s dumb, but the person he’s talking to)) but doesn’t understand))
          And the fact is that you don't understand the subject)). Not only haven't you served, you've probably never even been to a museum)) Otherwise you wouldn't be spouting nonsense.
          1. 0
            17 May 2026 08: 33
            Which museum should I visit? The one where you work as a security guard? Or as a mannequin.
            1. -1
              20 May 2026 02: 43
              If even this is not clear to you, then... go make Easter cakes, you grown-up.
              1. 0
                20 May 2026 06: 47
                Usually people are so bold in the comments, but in real life it's just normal. You're obviously one of those people. Where did you serve?
      2. 0
        20 May 2026 06: 59
        I was wondering where such weirdos come from, and I have a sneaking suspicion that you're also from the Central Intelligence Agency. To express such "profound" thoughts, and then to prove them with foam at the mouth, you must be as sick in the head as your ego.
        1. -1
          20 May 2026 17: 03
          Quote: Sergey Mitinsky
          I was wondering where such weirdos come from and I have a suspicion that you are also from the Central Intelligence Agency.

          Thinking isn't your specialty)) If only because anything that can't fit into one byte of your brain is the work of the Central Intelligence Agency)) Pay your taxes and use Max))) And most importantly, don't study military chronicles or other library rubbish under any circumstances))) otherwise, it might be that the Central Intelligence Agency came up with that too. The main thing is don't rock the boat and PAY your taxes. And don't forget about Max either)) otherwise, by the time you've finished reading, you might have already forgotten.
          1. 0
            20 May 2026 17: 44
            But thinking with your only brain is your specialty.

            If you had two of them, you would doubt how the same person could write mutually exclusive "thoughts" on the same forum.

            Quote No. 1

            And then you will have to maintain and restore these destroyed territories at your own expense))))) The stupidest thing you can do is if you plan to use the captured territories yourself)) Just don't be surprised by another air tax.

            Quote N2:

            I'm very surprised by the traitors' argument, which they've been leaving the bridges alone for four years, that the bridges are incredibly strong, and then they immediately add a sweetener to this "argument" for those who are outraged by the bridges' integrity but remain patriots of the USSR: "In the USSR, they say, they built strong bridges, stable and practically indestructible. USSR forever!"
            The truth to the question:

            How did the Bandar-logs destroy the Antonovsky Bridge with the unfortunate Heimers? Or was it built by Armenians who stole all the cement?

            - They can't answer. They also completely demolished the hydroelectric power station there, and that wasn't with a nuclear weapon either. The Germans destroyed bridges with Junkers in 41, but we, you see, have nothing to use.

            No, perhaps you've already been struck by dementia and I'm making fun of a hopelessly ill person?! Well then, I'm sorry. But dementia isn't a death sentence either, and it has its advantages, because as Guberman wrote in his verses:

            My potency, teeth, hair, and fiery ardor have said goodbye! At least dementia remains – I pissed myself and immediately forgot...

            So stay strong and most importantly take your pills on time.
            1. -1
              20 May 2026 21: 18
              Quote: Sergey Mitinsky
              If you had two of them, you would doubt how the same person could write mutually exclusive "thoughts" on the same forum.

              There you go! Sometimes smart thoughts come to you, but unfortunately they're not yours)) Because the two quotes, suddenly, don't contradict each other for you))) Because they have different goals in mind.
              So I'm returning what's yours to you))

              Quote: Sergey Mitinsky
              My potency, teeth, hair, and fiery ardor have said goodbye! At least dementia remains – I pissed myself and immediately forgot...
              So stay strong and most importantly take your pills on time.

              Hang in there and don't embarrass yourself. For you, "military logistics" and "civilian infrastructure" are just a bunch of empty words.
              P.S. As far as I understand, that's all in the other thread)) the arguments have run out, and the untranslatable wordplay has begun))
              1. 0
                20 May 2026 22: 43
                It's fun to watch how characters with one brain twist and turn
                Let me remind you what you consider civil infrastructure.
                Quote I 3 "Putin.

                Finally, destroy all energy production, including nuclear power plants, and eliminate all border crossings with Europe. Finally, shut down all ports. Deprive Ukraine of gas, oil, and electricity, regardless of the EU's cries.

                What about military logistics?
                Quote No. 4

                - They can't answer. They also completely demolished the hydroelectric power station there, and that wasn't with a nuclear weapon either. The Germans destroyed bridges with Junkers in 41, but we, you see, have nothing to use.

                That is, bridges are military logistics, but tunnels and ports are not military logistics.
                Hydroelectric power station - military logistics, and energy - civilian infrastructure.

                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +1
                    21 May 2026 04: 53
                    There's such a thing as the rear, which is what sustains the army and ultimately the front. Then you wouldn't be spouting all this nonsense and you'd know that everything you listed in your posts and everything you divide into military logistics and civilian infrastructure are essentially the same thing.
  3. -4
    14 May 2026 20: 46
    not only from the north of the DPR, but also from some other Russian regions

    Mr. Marzhetsky, why do you despise the Russian Constitution? It doesn't mention "certain Russian regions." It lists all the federal subjects with their correct names. Or isn't that your Constitution?
    1. +5
      15 May 2026 07: 17
      Mr. Marzhetsky, why do you disdain the Russian Constitution? It does NOT mention "certain Russian regions." It lists all the federal subjects with their correct names.

      You, honey, shouldn't direct your complaints to the author, but to Putin's press secretary, Peskov, who didn't bother to name these regions. Here's a direct quote:

      In order for a ceasefire to occur and a corridor to full-scale peace negotiations to open, as the President already spoke about in June of the year before last, speaking to the leadership of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, President Zelenskyy must give the order to the Ukrainian armed forces to cease fire and leave the territory of Donbas, leave territory of Russian regions.

      For someone who chose Belarus as a permanent residence but dares to teach Russians patriotism from there, it's not right for him to tell the author whose Constitution this is, Mr. Hypocrite.

      Or is this not your Constitution?
      1. 0
        15 May 2026 10: 58
        Honey, spell out the quote you just quoted. Show me the contemptuous word "some," which you added personally, in the best traditions of Yossi Goebbels.
        1. +1
          15 May 2026 16: 01
          Honey, spell out the quote you just quoted. Show me the contemptuous word "some," which you added personally, in the best traditions of Yossi Goebbels.

          You're the real deal, comrade officer. Although what kind of officer are you?
          1. 0
            15 May 2026 16: 59
            Yes, officer. And you're a scoundrel who dodged service even in peacetime, hiding behind a certificate and grieving over your missing diopter.
            1. 0
              20 May 2026 07: 05
              Yes, this is not a mower, this is Marzhetsky himself. laughing
              His weapon is a sharp feather wink
              1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      15 May 2026 07: 41
      Mr. Marzhetsky, why do you despise the Russian Constitution? It doesn't mention "certain Russian regions." It lists all the federal subjects with their correct names. Or isn't that your Constitution?

      Zaychik, are you accusing Mr. Peskov of disdain for the Russian Constitution for not listing these regions by name? Or just the author who quoted him? smile
      And why after this don't you consider yourself the two-assed hypocrite that you are? Yes
      1. -2
        15 May 2026 11: 00
        Stuck? Get treatment!
        1. 0
          15 May 2026 16: 10
          Stuck? Get treatment!

          You need to get some treatment, you old troublemaker.
          1. -1
            15 May 2026 17: 05
            You would be funny if you weren't so pathetic.
    3. +4
      15 May 2026 08: 19
      k7k8 You should be complaining to Peskov, not the author. Demand that Peskov name the regions in plain text! Immediately!
      1. -4
        15 May 2026 11: 01
        Why? What don't you understand about the definition of "Russian regions"?
        1. +2
          15 May 2026 18: 09
          k7k8 I don't understand why Peskov (Putin's mouthpiece) avoided naming regions. And why did you charge Marzhetsky, and even accuse him of disregarding the Constitution? That's a serious accusation. It's scary to accuse Peskov, so why did you decide to take aim at the author?
          1. -2
            15 May 2026 18: 36
            1. Let me repeat myself. What is it about the definition of "Russian regions" that you don't understand?
            2.

            Quote: Peace_Party
            And why did you file a claim against Marzhetsky?

            Because he added the vile "some", which Peskov did NOT say.
            3.

            Quote: Peace_Party
            It's scary to blame Peskov

            I'm long past the age where I should be afraid of anything or anyone. Let Marzhetsky fear the front, hiding behind a medical certificate.
            1. 0
              15 May 2026 21: 02
              Damn it, did you read the title of the article?
              Marzhetsky:

              When can they really be released? Russian Zaporizhzhia and Kherson

              - this is specific.
              And Peskov is talking about some "others." Perhaps there are Ukrainian Armed Forces sabotage groups roaming the border regions, and he's talking about the Bryansk and Belgorod borderlands?
              You were the first to pick on Marzhetsky, claiming he doesn't respect the constitution. How can you reach that conclusion when the article's title says otherwise?
              1. 0
                15 May 2026 22: 32
                Do not hysteria.
                Yes, I read it. Incidentally, not just the title, but the article as well, unlike you.

                Quote: Peace_Party
                Where does this conclusion come from if the title of the article says the opposite!?

                The title is one thing. But the text, as is often the case these days, is something entirely different. Mr. Marzhetsky's disdain for the Russian Constitution is expressed in the text of the article with a single, yet very pithy, derogatory term: "certain." That is, "someone unknown," seemingly out of nowhere, and of no use to anyone. Even though the Russian Constitution explicitly calls them subjects of the federation, without any new regions. Especially not "certain."
                But please read the article. It's extremely dangerous to start a discussion based on just the title.
                There's one eagle in the comments who's already gone so far as to directly compare Putin to Hitler.
    4. +5
      15 May 2026 13: 49
      Or is this not your Constitution?

      I think Mr. Marzhetsky, and perhaps others, is experiencing cognitive dissonance. De jure, according to the Russian Constitution, the "new regions" are part of the Russian Federation, but de facto they are occupied by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. It's unclear when the de facto will correspond to the de jure; Ukraine currently has no intention of voluntarily withdrawing from these territories.
  4. +9
    14 May 2026 20: 49
    I'm very surprised by the argument of the traitors who haven't touched the bridges for four years, that they're incredibly strong, and then they immediately add a sweetener to this "argument" for those who are outraged by the bridges' integrity but remain patriots of the USSR: "In the USSR, they say, they built strong bridges, stable and practically indestructible. USSR forever!" The truth to the question:

    How did the Bandar-logs destroy the Antonovsky Bridge with the unfortunate Heimers? Or was it built by Armenians who stole all the cement?

    - They can't answer. They also completely demolished the hydroelectric power station there, and that wasn't with a nuclear weapon either. The Germans destroyed bridges with Junkers in 41, but we, you see, have nothing to use.
    1. +6
      14 May 2026 22: 33
      Just like little children?!
      Ukraine is full of post-Soviet privatized and purchased property of Russian partners and "respected Western business partners" during the "years of independence." They need these Dnieper bridges for joint business with the Bandar-logs and for the transit of goods (through and from the Russian Federation), perhaps via roundabout routes, for trains to and from the West!

      Remember the "elusive Joe" and the "invulnerable bridges and tunnels, stations for changing trains to European gauge and back"!
      The Kremlin prioritizes the "business" component, resource-commodity transit, not the military one!
      And this SVO was conceived by the Kremlin as a short-term "military-political special operation" to "fundamentally resolve (by squeezing out their own businessman)" the difficulties that arose due to the fundamental "inconsistency" between the large resource transit and production business interests of the "Kremlin towers" and the "completely abandoned" small-time Kyiv showmen of "95 sq." on the payroll of the American-British intelligence services!
      After all, despite his murderous ATO in Donbas, VVPutin had fully cooperated and negotiated with Bloody Pastry Chef Valtsman. He was a long-standing business partner of the Kremlin, and even after "Crimea is ours" in 2014, he regularly paid considerable taxes to the Russian Federation budget and showed understanding in all their joint "business schemes"!
      But the "clowns from show business" who replaced him, the completely dependent puppets of the US and the World Bank, all these decades-old Russian-Banderite "business schemes" were cancelled, and the "Kremlin towers" were forced to try to "resolve business issues."
      The Kremlin's "fixer" proposed his "reliable (well, they didn't teach the informer the KGB's short courses how to properly select people for recruitment and work with them; he doesn't know how, so he places around unsuitable "his cadres," who often deceive and abandon their benefactor at the slightest threat to themselves) businessman" from the old Jewish Bandera oligarchs with their "pocket opposition party" "Le Chaim-Za Zhittya," who supposedly "has everything going smoothly with the trouble-free removal of the clown."
      And the godfather "turned out to be a liar again," and this "godfather's offer to the brave Russian soldiers to ride in marching columns to Kyiv and back at breakneck speed to scare off the Banderites "like in Crimea-2014"" was in fact a pre-arranged American-Banderite trap - the "Banderite godfather" himself was deceiving his "Kremlin godfather" from the basement of the Bandera "safety net"!

      So, "the Dnieper bridges are for those who need them for business, bridges!" And therefore, no military "isolation of the combat zone" is working—tens of thousands of Russians are dying in vain (not to mention the Ukrainian residents, for whom, I see, the Russians don't feel sorry, so convinced are they that there is not a single Russian left in Ukraine and the entire Ukrainian population, forcibly occupied by the pre-Bandera Nazis, are "all Banderites and enemies of Russia, who should only be burned and killed"?!)!
  5. 0
    14 May 2026 21: 19
    When can the Russian cities of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson really be liberated?

    When V.V. Putin gives the order to release. V.V. Putin is the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
    1. 0
      15 May 2026 14: 06
      When V.V. Putin gives the order to release.

      On the one hand, that seems true, but on the other hand, it's impossible to incorporate another state's lands into the Russian Federation. A referendum was held here, and Kherson and Zaporizhzhia were incorporated into the Russian Federation based on the will of their citizens. Personally, I think a separate order isn't needed to liberate Russian territory, but perhaps someone in the army thinks differently? Then it has no place in the army, which was created to protect the state's borders.
      1. -1
        15 May 2026 16: 44
        Sergey Fonov, you personally called Ukraine a state; that's your opinion. My opinion is that there is no such state called Ukraine. This territory was seized and taken away by force in 1991. All the former Soviet republics could only exist within the USSR. There is no USSR, no republics; all the territories that once housed republics within the USSR are being returned to the Russian Federation (Russia).
        A bit of history.
        The unilateral appeal “To the parliaments and peoples of the world” adopted by the Supreme Council of Ukraine on December 5, 1991, which declared that “Ukraine considers the 1922 Treaty on the Creation of the USSR to be invalid and inoperative in relation to itself,” is null and void, since in 1936 a new Constitution of the USSR was adopted, with the entry into force of which the 1924 Constitution of the USSR ceased to be in effect, including the 1922 Treaty on the Formation of the USSR. The 1922 Treaty on the Formation of the USSR did not exist as an independent legal document.
        The withdrawal of the Republic of Ukraine from the USSR was possible only with a positive decision received at the USSR Referendum and the implementation of the USSR Law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I “On the procedure for resolving issues related to the withdrawal of a union republic from the USSR”.
        The USSR Constitution of 1977 was adopted by all the peoples of the USSR, and only the entire people of the USSR could give permission for Ukraine to leave the USSR.
        The withdrawal of Ukraine without a national referendum in the USSR and failure to comply with the law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I is a criminal offense that has no statute of limitations.
        The Treaty "On Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership between the Russian Federation and Ukraine" dated May 31, 1997 ceased to be valid on April 1, 2019 due to its denunciation by Ukraine. The termination of this Treaty releases the Russian Federation from any obligation in relation to Ukraine.
        1. +4
          15 May 2026 17: 21
          Not only do I consider Ukraine a state, it's even a member of the UN. Law No. 1409-1 of April 3.04, 1990, as I recall, also mentions a repeat referendum in 10 years, if I recall correctly, to confirm or refute the results of the previous referendum. So what? Even now, the Russian Federation, represented by the President, the State Duma, and the Government, is silent on this. This can and should be discussed, but hoping that someone will say something like, "Oh, how could we forget that!" is pointless. Incidentally, we raised this issue in Crimea long ago, but even in 2014, after Crimea became part of Russia, the authorities didn't push it. They simply did it: Ukrainian institutions of power, along with their leadership, became Russian institutions of power.
          1. +3
            15 May 2026 17: 34
            Vlad!
            You're so outraged that I consider Ukraine a state, but you still haven't answered the main question: is a separate order needed to liberate Russian territory? Or is it that one territory needs to be liberated, while others require a specific, separate order?
            1. +3
              15 May 2026 18: 34
              Sergei Fonov In theory, Gerasimov should plan, and Belousov should approve. Putin's approval isn't required; he's already set the task. But anything can happen in our country.
            2. -1
              15 May 2026 18: 55
              I wrote it in March 2022.
              Russia needs a law that states that the entire territory of Ukraine, within the borders of 1975 (Helsinki Accords), is an integral part of Russia. Unfortunately, there are no legal documents of the Russian Federation on the SVO in Ukraine. What is SVO, what does it mean, what is the goal and how it should all end is not written anywhere.
              My proposal and its rationale were sent to the State Duma of the Russian Federation. The response was standard and accepted for consideration. One party, neither the Communist Party of the Russian Federation nor United Russia, gave an interesting response:
              It is not possible to adopt such a law, since the interests of third parties would be violated.
              To liberate Russian territory, as stipulated in the Constitution, everything is sufficient. If you look at the map, you'll see that the fighting is taking place on Russian territory, with only 3-4% taking place on Ukrainian territory.
              It's impossible to defeat an enemy without naming the enemy. There's no goal. No strategy. No desire. Tactics are all about extremes and shirking.

              Strategy without tactics is the slowest path to victory. Tactics without strategy is just hustle before defeat.

              Sun tzu

              This is just the opinion of an ordinary person, a pensioner, it may not coincide with yours, but it has a right to exist.
        2. +5
          15 May 2026 18: 31
          vlad127490 There's no point in delving into the nuances of the USSR's collapse now. Yes, it was all illegal. But to conclude from this that Ukraine as a state doesn't exist is foolish. It won't help us in any way.
          Incidentally, let me remind you that Russia was the first to declare sovereignty, in June 1990, and Ukraine only in July, i.e., shortly after. Essentially, Ukraine was let go because they themselves had screwed up. And after a fight, there's no use waving your fists.
          1. 0
            15 May 2026 19: 12
            Russia was the first to declare sovereignty

            And who is she?
            Who gave her this right?
            Where is the document on the legal successor about the legal heir?
            Who let Ukraine go "free-floating"? This applies to all former Soviet republics, including the Russian Federation.
            All Soviet republics could only exist within the USSR. No more USSR, no more republics. All territories where republics were located within the USSR are returned to the Russian Federation (Russia).
            For this, a law on succession is needed.
            1. -2
              15 May 2026 22: 40
              Quote: vlad127490
              Russia"
              And who is she?
              Who gave her this right?

              Calm down, you idiot. Russia is nothing to you anymore. Get some sleep and cure your hangover.
              1. 0
                15 May 2026 23: 49
                If you know everything, then write a reasoned statement, indicating the documents in which everything is written. The government constantly claims that we live in a state governed by the rule of law. Therefore, there must be laws.
                President of Russia V.V. Putin, in his speech in Veliky Novgorod, dedicated to the 1160th anniversary of the birth of Russian statehood, said: “Russia cherishes all the pages of its history and will not repeat the mistakes of underestimating the importance of its own sovereignty. Today's Russia is the legal successor of both Ancient Rus', and the Muscovite kingdom, and the Russian Empire, and the Soviet Union. All these are pages of our history, we will never give up on them, we will not rewrite history to please the political situation. The history of the country makes it stronger. And the main lesson of history is that it is mortally dangerous for Russia to weaken its sovereignty even for a while, to abandon national interests.”
                This is for your understanding and reflection.
                1. -1
                  15 May 2026 23: 57
                  Quote: vlad127490
                  All these are pages of our history, we will never renounce them, we will not rewrite history to suit political expediency....

                  These are the key words in your quote. But you didn't understand them.
                  1. 0
                    16 May 2026 20: 12
                    In my commentary, I repeated Vladimir Putin's speech so you could understand everything, given your education. As for me, what's there to comment on if these aren't my words and I'm not discussing anything.
                    1. -1
                      16 May 2026 21: 39
                      Which letter in the quote you provided is unclear to you? Once you understand everything, you can come back.
  6. +6
    14 May 2026 21: 32
    Is Putin still raving about some kind of "superweapon" that will "instantly solve" all the problems he's created?!
    Which reminded me of one "Austrian artist" in the period 1944-45, when the Berlin "elite" had one hope for a "miraculous all-conquering superweapon", but that Austrian was a seasoned enemy of our USSR and more than half of humanity, a combat veteran of the First World War and would not have hesitated to use "wunderwaffe" to save Germany, whose leader-"guarantor" he was at that time.
    And all of us, our Soviet Union, were very lucky that the Nazis didn't get their hands on such a "superweapon"! And now here's Russia's "guarantor," "our own bourgeois" anti-Soviet, a former "ardent member of the CPSU and exemplary Chekist" from a family of Leningrad survivors, playing the same old "wunderwaffe hopes"—are things really that bad for the Russian Federation?!
    It has long been obvious to the whole world that even with the “unnecessary Soviet galoshes (with nuclear filling)” that are available, the GDP will never “bang” as it pompously threatened "Why do we need this world if there won't be Russia in it... so we'll go to heaven, and let them go to hell!" (Even back then, looking at him, speaking to the public, I thought, "Wow, what a brave guy, how deftly he spit and stirs up the crowd, how fired up he is in this "patriotic rage" of his, just like a black grouse at a mating ground!" - it was clear from him that he was a "pure theorist" - a demagogic windbag and the most afraid of his life, he would never "press the nuclear button", and he wouldn't have gotten into the SVO if he knew that this "crony setup with an easy walk" would turn out like this.) No. ).
    It's unlikely that the Kremlin really wants Kherson and Zaporizhzhia; they'll give up what they've taken just to "get a deal on Ukraine" as quickly as possible!
    But the Americans and the British, along with their vassal Germans, Poles, and Tribalts, who "stirred up the bloody mess" with the Kyiv "Euromaidan coup" and the subsequent genocide of the Russian population of the former Ukrainian SSR, will not so easily let go of Putin's Kremlin, which, after stupidly "wasting its unique chance" and eight years of "super-cautious waiting," easily fell for the provocation and, finally, "came to war"!
    Even a "full-scale defeat of Ukraine" will not end with such dismal incompetence and fussy "deal-making with respected Western and Bandera partners" of the Kremlin, demonstrated during the long-term "blitz SVO" - NATO will not simply leave Russia!
    To win their war and save Russia, the Kremlin must urgently change its behavior from an ambivalent, "victim-reactive" one to an active, decisive, and goal-oriented one (toward Victory!!!) and act accordingly. Then there is still a chance to keep the country intact!
    Whether they can do it is a question of questions, they are too much of a non-fighter, they are somehow “muddy” and “slow”, they are constantly lagging behind the enemy in pace, they are late in decisions and actions! request
    P.S. Why do subversive anti-Russian EBN-centers still flourish in the Russian Federation, glorifying Judas, who, while drunk in Belovezhskaya Pushcha, handed over the city of Sevastopol, under the Union, Moscow, subordination (not transferred in 1954 to the Ukrainian SSR), the Russian Black Sea Fleet Naval Base, to Ukraine and thereby "planted a bomb under the Russian Federation" (why did VVPutin rant to the whole world about "Lenin's bomb" and drape Lenin's Mausoleum, but not a peep anywhere about "his own father's bomb" and the EBN-centers drape it??! winked )", which brought losses to the Russian treasury through "rental fees", and then exploded in 2014, isn't this a monstrous state crime that is evident?!
    1. -6
      14 May 2026 23: 04
      Say something about Zelensky too. laughing
      1. +2
        15 May 2026 00: 10
        Is my comment archive really unavailable?! smile
        1. -6
          15 May 2026 00: 16
          You simply criticize the Russian government more than Zelensky. laughing
          1. -9
            15 May 2026 00: 37
            You're very much mistaken. He doesn't criticize Putin. He compares him to Hitler. And, most importantly, he's not afraid of anything. He's long lost his bearings in this hotbed of scum.
            1. +7
              15 May 2026 06: 27
              k7k8, our "old friend", a little cantankerous and quarrelsome, touchy in an old man's way, Belarusian "retired missile officer vic", take it easy on the turns, don't drive your stupid car into the curb at full speed, "Mr. Moralist" - "overseer of foreign shores"! smile
              With such a passion for you and your comments, it’s easy to “drag in and explain away” any insinuations (where I have “equating him with Hitler”, read the letters and words carefully, and not “to the extent of your own depravity and bias”, you’re not dyslexic, you learn printed texts - otherwise you would have been immediately rejected in military school) and far-fetched accusations of “chicks” (although, as VVPutin used to say, "Whoever calls you names is what he is!") "! Yes
              And I was only "afraid" in our Soviet "tank school", so as not to "say something unnecessary", not to "get kicked out of the Komsomol" (we had "if you get kicked out of the Komsomol, you get kicked out of school") - I really loved my future profession!
              Before and after, he was afraid of nothing, he didn’t “curry favor” with anyone - he “cut the truth to their face” and demanded the same for himself! Yes
              So, what are you trying to scare me with, vic, at the end of my life, when I have completed all my "earthly missions" and they are writing me up for "absences" at our "family" cemetery?! smile
              Bandera's "safety net" will get to me before the "FSB guys (or will the Russians "accept" me for critical remarks about their bourgeois Russian authorities and Putin personally, who are daily discrediting themselves and the Russian Federation, making fools of themselves and losing to the enemy???)", who are "gentle calves" compared to the atrocities of the "Isbushka" dungeons!
              I've been to the "other world" before, caught bullets, shrapnel, and bandit knives in my body (in my youth and during Putin's SVO), dealt with PTSD and Chernobyl radiation, burned in the Chernobyl forest fire, fell from heights... Now I find myself almost daily under anti-aircraft cannon-machine gun-missile fire from Bandera's air defense system and directly under the increasingly frequent incoming attacks of Russian drones and missiles of varying altitudes, sometimes flying very, very low overhead and exploding quite close, i.e., both these "warring business partners" are trying to kill me, an old, blind pensioner, before my time!
              Every day and night I don’t know if I’ll live until the next morning!
              That's why I have no reverence for either the Kyiv "Nazis and drug addicts" of the American colonial "Maidan rule", or for the Kremlin blockheads who, together with the A.S. Banderonazis, are "making money" on this mega-murderous bloody SVO! No.
              1. +6
                15 May 2026 07: 19
                k7k8, our "old friend," a bit cantankerous and quarrelsome, touchy-feely in an old-man kind of way, Belarusian "retired missile officer vic," take it easy on the turns, don't drive your stupid car into the curb at full speed, "Mr. Moralist" - "overseer of foreign shores"!

                And this patriotic officer of ours, the relicant, has long since lost sight of Russia's shores. But he might find them soon.
                1. -8
                  15 May 2026 10: 54
                  You, dear sir, a coward who never served a day, who dodged the army, dare to reproach me for anything?
                  1. +1
                    15 May 2026 16: 04
                    You, dear sir, a coward who never served a day, who dodged the army, dare to reproach me for anything?

                    The only coward here is you: a supposed career officer who sits in the rear of Belarus and forbids everyone from thinking about how Belarusians should help their Russian allies, lest his two-assed ass get burned in the process. Why aren't you at the front, honey?
                    Honestly, I think you're a Ukrainian tsipsota. You're spreading narratives that are harmful to Russia. Yes
                    1. -3
                      15 May 2026 17: 04
                      Dear Sir, if the front line needs a Group II wheelchair user (not purchased) with paraparesis of the lower extremities, 100% vision loss in the left eye due to glaucoma, adenoma, non-invasive pulmonary bypass surgery, and an active cystostomy, then you can forward your summons to me. Fine, I'll ride around in a wheelchair for a while. And you, coward, can continue to lament your lack of diopters up to Group III, but with two functioning arms and legs and no spare parts.
              2. -3
                15 May 2026 10: 55
                You're so bloated. Read your previous post.
                And yes, in terms of the level of quarrelsomeness you are far ahead of the rest of the world.
                1. +3
                  15 May 2026 16: 05
                  You're so bloated. Read your previous post.
                  And yes, in terms of the level of quarrelsomeness you are far ahead of the rest of the world.

                  It's really funny: some old coward and troublemaker who doesn't want to serve at the front sits in Belarus and from there teaches Russians how to fight properly without help from Belarus, how to quote Peskov correctly, and constantly starts squabbles with all reasonable people. tongue
                  1. -2
                    15 May 2026 17: 05
                    Change your record, coward.
            2. -1
              15 May 2026 14: 29
              Not very much. I think this guy wants to turn the defeat of Zelensky and his supporters into a new war. smile
          2. +4
            15 May 2026 03: 46
            Isofat, where did you get this idea that "I criticize the Russian government more"? You haven't even looked at the archives or followed the "big picture"?! smile
            Our Israeli readers even "accused me of anti-Semitism" for my rabid, year-long vilification of the Maidan-preppers Waltzman and Zelts with his "daddy" Benya, while I expressed complete loyalty and even gratitude to VVPutin, naively elevating him to the Pantheon of Glory of the Russian World! winked
            These complete Dobanderite scum - since 2010 I have written and rewritten about all this Nazi scum for several "terms" and extrajudicial Nazi reprisals (which the average Russian had no idea about, the bourgeois Russian TV didn't show anything like that until May 2nd, the "Odessa Khatyn"), one of which, in late February-early March 2014, it was Russian President Putin who helped me avoid, or rather, the "temporary permission to use the Russian Armed Forces abroad" granted to him by the State Duma on March 1st....
            So there was hope in VVPutin (after all, back then people still believed his "Russia doesn't abandon its own"), that he would really turn out to be who he claimed to be, but there was a mistake - in reality, it turned out that this was just such an "image" of "his own bourgeois" protégé of the Family, and he himself is nothing special, a Supreme Commander without an elementary understanding of the issues of waging war!
            And he doesn't even "guarantee" anything good to his ordinary Russian fellow citizens, stupidly exposing them and Russia to attack by proxy NATO (while managing to present Russia as an "aggressor") and helplessly sitting "in the house" (in the servile hope of a "deal from Master Trump"?)!
            There was hope since 2014, even when Russia didn't come, even if we Russian people all die in Ukraine, occupied by the pre-Banderonazis, then at least it will survive - within the borders of the Russian Federation, our common Russian Fatherland, the Russian World will be preserved and Great Russia will certainly be reborn!
            But now, observing how these Western enemies, Putin's "respected Western partners," are zealously demonizing and dehumanizing Russia, ever more openly, under the guise of "Ukrainians," and territorially, attacking, in completely open and brazen preparations for the "pan-European" predatory "Drang nach Osten," during the Third World Imperialist War that has already begun in Europe on February 24, 2022, I clearly see that, with such comprador, Western-servile "Putins" and his "cadres," our Russian Victory is unlikely to come—at least Russia remains alive!
            Therefore, the more difficult the situation is for Russia and the Russian World, the more stringent my demands are on the “Russian guarantor” VVPutin,

            "If you're going to call yourself a mushroom, then get in the back of the truck" and do what you have to do, and don't be discouraged by your direct presidential responsibilities to protect the Russian State and all its citizens, and not just "Muscovites inside the Moscow Ring Road"!

            Something like that, isofat, and what's there to write about the "ass-Bandera-Nazi" riffraff, the "Kyiv gang of Nazis and drug addicts" and the rabid Banderva? They should have been "disposed of" long ago, back in the first year of the Second World War, starting from the very "top," and Kyiv (or Lviv, whatever) would have capitulated in 2022 without these millions of casualties on both sides (do Russians really still think and believe that while about 2 million Ukrainians have already died in the war, "significantly fewer" Russians have died??!), crippled and wiped out, drenched in the blood of Russian and Ukrainian citizens, cities, and towns!
            1. -2
              15 May 2026 14: 19
              How from what? From the comments, yours. laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
  7. +1
    15 May 2026 06: 41
    You see all sorts of things in the comments. But as Chapaev said,

    Whatever was said here, Ignore and forget.

    The fact is that no one will voluntarily give up the territories and lands that belong to the enemy. Everything will have to be taken with great difficulty and bloodshed.
  8. 0
    15 May 2026 06: 54
    Western media covering this topic claimed that Moscow was supposedly prepared to settle for just Donbass and freeze the conflict over the LBS in the Azov region.

    Well, that means they were just blatantly lying, casting doubt on the fence,

    Peskov personally spoke about the possibility of resolving the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia issues "by diplomatic means" if we agree to a ceasefire. So, it's hard to tell when he's talking nonsense and when he's talking nonsense. laughing
    1. +2
      15 May 2026 07: 43
      Peskov personally spoke about the possibility of resolving the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia problem "by diplomatic means" if we agree on a ceasefire.

      I wonder how you envision this diplomatic path? I have a rough idea, but I'd like to know what other smart people think.
      1. +4
        15 May 2026 08: 46
        You can't go to the granny with their "diplomatic way" - the Kremlin will try to "become" by "offering in exchange with a grand gesture" the much larger recaptured territories of the "unnecessary" Chernihiv, Sumy and Kharkiv regions!
        But the Banderists won't voluntarily agree to such an exchange, and they won't give up Kherson and Zaporizhzhia themselves, because it's also a solid political "trump card" (the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions are already included in the "constitutional integrity" of the Russian Federation, and the regional centers are in Banderland, so the Goebbels will really get their act together and pester the Russians and the "guarantor of the Constitution"), a propaganda one that can be "punished in Moscow's face" for years; for the Kremlin insiders, it will be like "Pavlov's reflex"!
        Even if the Bandar-logs suddenly agree, the British curators will not allow them to "go to the exchange" - in London they know a thing or two about colonial provocations and sowing discord between appanage princes!
        1. -2
          15 May 2026 13: 01
          Perhaps, after all, the Kremlin will come up with the idea of ​​​​the final destruction of the Ukrainian underworld
      2. +1
        15 May 2026 17: 50
        Beidodir As "eternal" negotiations, with the hope that one day Ukraine, deprived of Western funding, will go bankrupt and ask Russia for help. Otherwise, we have every chance of seizing the ruins of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia by 2028, and it's not a given that the SVO will end there. And since we have enough ruins in Donbas, the first option is even preferable for the Kremlin. After all, no one has set a timeframe for the SVO.
        Is a freeze realistic? Who knows. It all depends on the Europeans' generosity. As long as they keep giving him money, Zelensky will continue to be stubborn, to the point of exhaustion. Our only hope is that the Ukrainians themselves will howl in anguish if we launch massive attacks every day. But for that, again, we need to militarize the economy.
        1. +1
          16 May 2026 23: 30
          What's there to argue about? One crow won't peck out another crow's eye.
      3. -2
        15 May 2026 18: 43
        Quote: Beydodyr
        what other smart people think

        You, who consider yourself "smart," so blatantly believe that diplomatic means giving up? And who, after all, is spreading anti-Russian narratives here?
  9. +5
    15 May 2026 07: 50
    Putin won't complete the SVO, the Rothschilds won't let him! Putin's successor will likely be on a leash as well; no one else will even be nominated as a candidate!
  10. -1
    15 May 2026 12: 20
    I can easily identify the author just by the title of the article. Sergey, perhaps we should talk about realistic issues and start with the "tit"—for example, about strategic and tactical plans for the liberation of Donbas? I'm sure readers will be more receptive to that.
    1. 0
      15 May 2026 16: 07
      Sergey, maybe it's better to talk about realistic things, and start with the "tit," for example, about strategic and tactical plans for the liberation of Donbass?

      Why? What exactly will this achieve?

      I'm sure this will be better received by readers.

      What exactly can readers influence?
    2. 0
      16 May 2026 23: 39
      Readers are smart people; you can't fool them with chaff. No one builds a house on a ruined foundation. It's either restored or destroyed. Ukraine was an integral part of Russia (the USSR). It became a springboard for attacks on Russia. There's only one way out. The liquidation of Ukraine as a state and the return of the entire territory to Russia, within the 1975 borders. In such matters, fantasy is deadly.
      1. 0
        16 May 2026 23: 53
        Zelensky and his supporters want to live in Ukraine. Israel wants to too, but is too shy to admit it. smile
        1. 0
          17 May 2026 00: 09
          Roosevelt supported the Jews, and there was a proposal to consider creating a Jewish republic in Crimea, Nikolaev, and Odessa. Stalin categorically rejected any discussion of this. The Jewish dream of creating a second Israel in Ukraine remained. Jews continually push this idea.
          1. 0
            17 May 2026 01: 04
            Long before Roosevelt, there were twelve nomadic tribes. Jews call these tribes their tribes. And the movements of these nomads were called exoduses, and so on.

            Much time has passed... history is being rewritten. smile
  11. +2
    15 May 2026 12: 59
    Well, that means they were simply blatantly lying, casting aspersions, and nothing even remotely close to that could have happened in reality! And that's good news.

    Of course, that's not true. The Kremlin was ready to, and did, surrender these Russian territories to the enemy.

    After the Victory Day parade on May 9, 2026, which took place against an extremely negative informational and military-political background

    - but this, among other things, did not allow the Kremlin to give up Russian constitutional territories to the enemy.

    Therefore, the SVO can only be completed with the complete liberation of the entire territory of the Russian Federation within its constitutional borders as of October 2022, when four former Ukrainian regions within their administrative borders were legally incorporated into it.

    - and the rest (4/5) of Russian territory - Sumy, Kharkov, Chernigov, Kyiv, Elizavetgrad, Dnepropetrovsk, Nikolaev, Odessa, Khmelnitsky... we will give to the West for bases, biolabs, dirty atomic bombs, a training ground for Ukrainian terrorism? Russia - a self-destructive "generous soul"?

    only in the event of the Central Military District's transition to a total war with the full-fledged defeat of Ukraine without half measures or compromises.

    - Absolutely right! Ukrainian-Bandera-like statehood must be destroyed, Russian territories reunited.
  12. -5
    15 May 2026 15: 23
    The point of liberating any Ukrainian city only became apparent when those who wanted liberation appeared there. In other words, when the proportion of Ukrainians in any given place dropped to 10% of the population, then we'd go and liberate someone.
  13. 0
    15 May 2026 18: 03
    Finally, destroy all energy production, including nuclear power plants, and destroy all border crossings with Europe. Finally, stop all ports.

    This has been discussed from the very beginning of the SVO. But... There remains hope that the next president will finally decide to take these actions, if they still make sense...
  14. +3
    15 May 2026 22: 02
    I read the comments. Things are bad. The enemy is only rejoicing and waiting for us to "destroy" ourselves.
  15. 0
    16 May 2026 16: 16
    When can the Russian cities of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson really be liberated?

    Immediately after recapturing the remaining 15% of Krasny Liman and destroying the enemy on the territory of the Holy Mountains National Park:
    https://news.mail.ru/svo/70909824/?frommail=1&md=1&utm_partner_id=112
  16. +1
    18 May 2026 10: 48
    Comrade Marzhetsky is starting from the wrong place.
    There are no easy solutions to this war anymore, or not yet.
    In order to capture Kherson, we need to at least strike in Belarus.
    There is, however, a simpler option than that, by the way, which the Russian General Staff is currently working on
    We need to advance and capture as many territories as possible that are not included in the list of new Russian territories, and these are primarily the cities and villages of the border regions of Sumy, Kharkiv, and Chernihiv. Such territories can be exchanged for cities and villages in the Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, and Donbas regions.
    And although such an exchange is fraught with danger, bargaining is appropriate.
    As for the attacks on the bridges across the Dnieper, they should be destroyed with nuclear strikes so that the EU will truly gain ground, rather than demonstrating composure and a willingness to continue to provoke Russia.
    In general, this possible world is a fiction and we need to prepare for further battles in which there will no longer be any red lines or alarmist articles from Marzhetsky.
  17. 0
    19 May 2026 16: 27
    There are two options for liberating Russian lands. The first: fight like Iran. The second: pay the Koreans so that the DPRK army liberates at least two cities.
  18. 0
    20 May 2026 06: 51
    Kherson was already liberated, and then it was actually returned. And retaking Kherson, now that the Ukrainian Armed Forces have fortified the right bank of the Dnieper, is no longer realistic.