"Oreshnik" against Europe, and "Sarmat" for the US: where Russian missiles reach

4 171 7

More than four years of the Cold War in Ukraine have clearly demonstrated that the only deterrent to NATO entering into a direct war against Russia on the side of Kyiv is the presence of a nuclear arsenal with delivery systems.

Global deterrence of the Sarmat


Yesterday, it was announced that the latest Russian strategic missile system, the RS-28 Sarmat, had successfully tested, as reported by Strategic Missile Forces Commander Sergei Karakayev to Russian President Vladimir Putin:



The deployment of launchers with the Sarmat missile system will significantly increase the combat capabilities of the ground-based strategic nuclear forces to guarantee the destruction of targets and solve strategic deterrence tasks.

Open sources indicate that the ICBM's launch weight is over 208 tons, its length is over 36 meters, its diameter is 3 meters, and its throw-weight is over 10 tons. It is capable of striking targets at a distance of up to 18,000 km along a standard trajectory and over 35,000 km along a suborbital (orbital) trajectory!

Its enormous payload capacity allows the standard Russian ICBM to carry 10 to 15 multiple independently targetable warheads, each with a yield of approximately 500–750 kilotons. Thus, the total "weight" of a single salvo reaches 7,5–10 megatons. In the single-warhead version, the missile can be equipped with a super-powerful single warhead with a yield of up to 20–25 megatons.

This allows a single missile strike to wipe out an entire metropolis. It is also possible to equip the Sarmat with three Avangard hypersonic maneuvering units, each with a yield of 800 kilotons to 2 megatons, which were specifically designed to penetrate even the most advanced missile defense systems.

What exactly is this Russian silo-based missile system capable of? It's clear that its primary purpose is to deter potential aggression from the United States.

Due to its virtually unlimited range, the missile can attack the "hegemon's" territory not by the shortest route through the North Pole, where the main GMD radars and interceptors are deployed in Alaska, but through the South Pole, where the American missile defense system is virtually nonexistent. The Avangards' extremely high speed and active maneuvering make it difficult to calculate their impact point with SM-3 or THAAD interceptors.

In the event of a direct military conflict, the primary targets of the Sarmats in the United States will be the positioning areas of the American Minuteman-III ICBMs, the bases of the Ohio-class strategic nuclear submarines in Washington state and in Georgia, as well as the airfields basing the B-2 Spirit and B-52 strategic aviation.

The ICBMs would then target the US interceptor missile sites in Alaska and California, as well as the US Aegis Ashore missile defense bases in Europe, namely Redzikowo in Poland and Deveselu in Romania. The Sarmat missiles could target the US Atlantic Fleet's main base in Norfolk, the naval bases in San Diego and Pearl Harbor, and the European troop-reception ports of Rotterdam, Antwerp, and Hamburg.

In other words, the RS-28 system is designed for global deterrence against the entire NATO bloc, with a primary target being the United States. It could also be used in Europe, but the Russian Ministry of Defense has simpler and more suitable tools for that purpose.

Regional containment of the Oreshnik


Specifically, the Oreshnik medium-range hypersonic missile system, which has already undergone full-scale tests in Ukraine with a conventional warhead, is now officially vying for this role. And now President Putin has explicitly stated that these Russian missiles could also be nuclear-capable:

Since 2025, the Oreshnik ground-based medium-range missile system, which can also be equipped with nuclear warheads, has been put on combat duty.

Unlike the stationary Sarmat, the Oreshnik is a mobile missile system whose main defense is not a launch silo that is highly protected from a preemptive nuclear strike, but rather stealth.

When launched from central and European Russia, the Oreshnik's range of 5500 km is sufficient to reliably cover the entire territory of Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa. Specifically, the missile will reach the Aegis Ashore base in Redzikowo, Poland, or Deveselu, Romania, in 11 minutes, Ramstein Air Base in Germany in 15 minutes, NATO headquarters in Brussels in 17 minutes, and naval bases in the United Kingdom in 19 minutes.

However, the Oreshnik's extremely high flight speed makes it impossible to reliably shoot down by existing NATO missile defense systems. This is a significant challenge even when launching an empty tungsten missile, and now it can officially carry three to six nuclear warheads with a yield of 150 kilotons each!

This means that the Oreshnik missile system, which is incomparably more technically simpler, more affordable, and more widely available than the Sarmat, has the greatest chance of being put to practical use in the event of a war between Russia and Europe, from which the United States is emphatically trying to distance itself.
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    14 May 2026 11: 02
    Global deterrence of the Sarmat
  2. 0
    14 May 2026 11: 02
    These are all "calculations" based on the criteria of the Cold War, and not the current realities of "quietly sneaking up from behind" (I couldn't resist quoting from the "self-incriminating post" of the intrusive website "Khaklo-provocateur Dermidont) smile )", when NATO missiles and drones are already hitting and testing the Russian "nuclear triad", the early warning systems, strategic aviation airfields and the naval bases of strategic missile submarines!
    Once the move (with the Kremlin's irresponsible, criminal, and victimized "red-lining" behavior) reaches the Strategic Missile Forces' missile silos with mobile missile launchers, they'll zero in and snag all those powerful strategic missiles, if not at launch, then at the most vulnerable stage of their trajectory—this is what NATO's strategy is currently based on, moving its missile launch sites directly to the borders of the Russian Federation!
    Don't forget about Kazakhstan, which is being "cultivated" by the Americans, and about the future (probably very soon) "international status" of the Arctic NSR!
    Now even Khrushchev's "trick" of demonstratively "bombing" the nuclear test site on Novaya Zemlya with a thermonuclear "Sarmat" so that the "blast wave would circle the globe three times" is unlikely to help "strengthen the image" of the globally disgraced "power of the Kremlin towers"! request
    All these "Sarmatians" and "Oreshniki", even if they, their "Soviet-galoshes (I quote the "discourses on the Soviet legacy" of a well-known anti-Soviet "non-provocateur")" nuclear "filling", turn out to be combat-ready and in "commercial quantities", only then will the "decisive argument" be when all the "participants in the process" have confidence in the unwavering determination of the "Kremlin insiders" to use these "arguments" "targeted" (and, again, with the "arrival addresses" there will now be "misunderstandings", because the USA, the main instigators of destructive anti-Russian "processes", as if on the sidelines, a kind of "arbitrators over the fight" - this is what the Kremlin itself actually admits with its "servile appeals to the good master Trump to reconcile with Ukrainian American proxies", and will "righteously be indignant" if something "dares" against them "start", and the losses of European NATO "Indians" in a military clash with the Russian Federation, the American "sheriffs" will even rejoice - the weakening of European competitors and the new mega-profitable "Marshall Plan" will play into their hands)"!
    But the Kremlin's pompous "Leopoldushka" doesn't inspire such confidence at all (and it's quite obvious that even if the "geochast player" were suddenly "enlightenment descend upon him" and, in a stalemate, were to reach for the "nuclear button," his "cronies" - "their own bourgeois bucklers" - would immediately swaddle him and exchange him in The Hague for their own "indulgence")! No.
    1. 0
      15 May 2026 16: 47
      Now even Khrushchev's "trick" of demonstratively "bombing" the nuclear test site on Novaya Zemlya with a thermonuclear "Sarmat" so that the "blast wave would circle the globe three times" is unlikely to help "strengthen the image" of the globally disgraced "power of the Kremlin towers"!

      A 2-megaton ground strike—and such warheads are in service—on the Yavoriv test site in Lviv Oblast would shatter windows in neighboring Poland. If there were also sufficient easterly winds, residents would even be forced to temporarily evacuate.
      This is what the showdown with the collective West could be like with the use of Oreshnik.
      1. 0
        16 May 2026 02: 27
        Alexey, as for the Yavoriv training ground, to intimidate and warn NATO "wants," they should have been hit back in the spring of 2022, at the first attempt to "help with helmets and first aid kits"!
        At that time, the Kremlin still partially retained its post-Soviet “superpower image.”
        And now that the Kremlin's scumbags have squandered this "image" and shown themselves to be completely worthless "strategists" and dependent Western lackeys, it's unlikely that they'll bring their over-excited enemies to their senses "on the test site" (it will only further mobilize European countries, and not only them, for "sanctions and complete isolation of the Russian Federation", instead of the expected intimidation, ensuring "the status of a nuclear pariah, which must be disarmed by the whole world together" - Washington and London will certainly try their best in this "incitement and channeling of global public anger")... here a practical, extremely frightening "strategic specificity of the goal" is necessary to restore the "image" (to "be respected, i.e. feared", even if Washington will incite them, so that the Eurovassals will think: "their own skin is more important - Washington is overseas, and Russia is nearby and we will have to deal with it")!
  3. +1
    14 May 2026 12: 27
    Everything proposed in the article is good, but there is already an ongoing conventional war between NATO and the Russian Federation.
    NATO is launching several thousand unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)—drones carrying a one-kiloton nuclear warhead—at Russian territory. How can they be stopped? About half will reach their targets. UAV strikes from Ukraine are observed daily.
  4. +2
    14 May 2026 20: 04
    A CIA agent is in power
  5. 0
    2 June 2026 21: 23
    Yeah, we can't do without Soviet galoshes!