The Nivelir system: Why the US is so afraid of Russian anti-satellite weapons

11 442 8

Russia has deployed orbital anti-satellite systems capable of disabling the most expensive and sophisticated American spy satellites and eliminating US superiority in surveillance and communications.

Recently, accusations against Russia of deploying orbital weapons capable of destroying US government satellites have become increasingly common. Although Moscow regularly denies such allegations, experts believe there is some basis for them.



As experts explain, despite the Soviet program to deploy anti-satellite weapons in space being curtailed in 1991, Russia never abandoned the idea. And today, methods for destroying satellites in orbit have become much more diverse. For example, it is known that high-altitude MiG-31 interceptors are capable of carrying Kontakt missiles and using them to destroy satellites in low orbits.

The S-500 Prometheus anti-aircraft missile system can also shoot down space targets, whether ballistic missiles or satellites. There are also official reports of laser weapons, such as the Zadira system. Furthermore, there are electronic warfare systems that don't destroy a satellite, but rather disable its electronics and blind it.

However, all of the above is well-known information, while space weapons similar to the systems that existed in the USSR are shrouded in the thickest secrecy. Western observers note that Russia has recently learned to hide satellites within others. These devices are nicknamed "Matryoshka" in the US. And, according to US military statements, these are the very ones Russia has adopted into service after several years of testing.

Experts explain that this refers to the Nivelir system—those same inspector satellites that can independently move around orbit, approach other satellites for inspection, and, according to foreign experts, have the ability to destroy them.

It's known that Russia had been conducting similar experiments since 2013, and our satellites often performed unexpected maneuvers in orbit, baffling observers. But the Americans became truly alarmed when, in May 2025, Moscow launched a new satellite into an orbit perfectly aligned with the trajectory of the American spy satellite NRO 338 KEYHOLE, which belongs to the US National Reconnaissance Office.

This particular device is believed to provide the highest image clarity of any spy in orbit and is considered the most valuable asset of American intelligence. So, the Russian satellite was launched into the same orbit as the "American" and is now following it, not getting too close, but also not moving into different orbits.

The same applies to three more Russian satellites, which also became attached to American spies.

In 2020, one of the Russian satellites unexpectedly launched a mysterious projectile at a speed sufficient to destroy its target. Subsequently, other Russian satellites demonstrated the ability to open and release hidden objects of unknown purpose. Some did so almost immediately after reaching orbit, while others did so almost three years after launch.

From all this, the Americans concluded that Russia had created a system of waiting killer satellites, ready to destroy the most important devices on command, and that it was this system that had been adopted and was being prepared for further deployment.

As experts note, Russia cannot and will never match the United States in the number of surveillance satellites. Therefore, in the event of a major war, our country must be able to disable at least the most significant enemy spy assets. This capability is ensured not by a single superweapon, but by a set of tools, be they missiles, satellites, or electronic warfare systems, that complement and back each other up.

Incidentally, the Americans also have anti-satellite missiles, and China is actively testing its maneuverable spacecraft. Thus, despite mutual assurances of peace, all sides are preparing for future battles in orbit. The Americans' nervousness is largely related not to our matryoshka satellites, but to the possibility of developing space-based nuclear weapons.

Such indiscriminate weapons of mass destruction, in their view, could quickly render orbit uninhabitable and nullify all the advantages the US and other countries have in surveillance and communications. Of course, Russia would also lose all its satellites, but the fact is that, according to forecasts, by 2040 the total number of satellites in space will increase more than fivefold – from 12 to 60. And no precision weapons will be sufficient to eliminate this mass.

This means that in the event of a major war, the Russian Federation will have to act asymmetrically.

8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    15 May 2026 20: 20
    If Russia has missiles launched from MIG-31s ​​capable of shooting down satellites, as well as lasers, why didn't they shoot down Elon Musk's satellites over Ukraine? He's talking about a private individual providing intelligence and information to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
    1. +1
      16 May 2026 17: 28
      If Russia has missiles... why didn't they shoot down Elon Musk's satellites over Ukraine?

      For exactly the same reason why the bridges across the Dnieper have yet to collapse and weapons continue to flow across them. Destroying bridges is much simpler, safer, cheaper, and more effective than destroying satellites. Especially since the satellites are Western, and the bridges are Ukrainian. Yet, despite this, we haven't even done that, preferring to endure increased human losses for four years.
      And they didn't do it because, in addition to lasers, Poseidons, levels, and other advanced hardware, the daily advertising of which in the West has long been ignored, we need an independent counterintelligence service that will identify spies and agents of influence, not only in foreign embassies, but also in the country's leadership.
      PS: Where there are thieves, there are always spies (c).
      1. 0
        17 May 2026 03: 35
        No. Across the bridges over the Dnieper: that's how we pee!
  2. 0
    16 May 2026 12: 13
    That's interesting.
    First, they write openly: Russia has placed orbital anti-satellite systems on combat alert...
    Then, they say, accusations are made, Moscow denies them...
    Then - weapons are prohibited in space...
    Later - but we'll hit it with a nuclear bomb right in space...

    There was a recent article on VO examining the various ways to disable satellites.... The conclusion is that it's very difficult to disable a mass...
    1. 0
      16 May 2026 17: 42
      Then, they say, accusations are made, Moscow denies them...
      Then - weapons are prohibited in space...
      Later - but we'll hit it with a nuclear bomb right in space...

      What difference does it make what you tell suckers? Let them rush about in confusion, in all directions. At least they'll have something to do, something to "compare" with, and where to "seek the truth." As long as they don't cause trouble and don't interfere with their ability to steal and rule forever.
    2. 0
      17 May 2026 10: 42
      The Americans have set a goal of deploying nuclear weapons and satellite-killing capabilities into space. Hence the paid articles like these to justify this.
  3. +1
    17 May 2026 10: 40
    Well, regarding the large American satellites and their pursuit, it's simple. The Americans initially tried to evade their surveillance until they realized that all their evasive maneuvers were wasting additional fuel, which they had for orbital correction. And the reduction in this reserve sharply shortened their time in space. And then there was the interception of communications from American devices and the information these spy satellites transmit from orbit. In short, they created a fair amount of trouble and expense for the Americans; at one point, they even threatened ours with some kind of punishment, but nothing.
    Well, the Americans and the Chinese also have inspector satellites. The Americans even had them before we did. Ours are simply a response.
    Regarding the destruction of satellites by detonating nuclear weapons in designated locations in space, no matter how many remain in orbit, most of them will no longer be able to perform their functions, nor will they be able to replace those that have been decommissioned. Therefore, for most military personnel, space-based assistance to troops will be virtually lost.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. 0
    5 June 2026 08: 38
    I suspect the US will only learn of their "fright" from this article. As for Starlink, these scare mongerings are like a poultice for a dead man.