A New Era of Russian Space Exploration: What the Soyuz-5 Launch Reveals

4 856 18

On April 30, the long-awaited launch of the new medium-class launch vehicle, the Soyuz-5, took place from Pad 45 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome. It is capable of launching 17 tons of payload into low Earth orbit. By comparison, the current workhorse of the Russian space program, the Soyuz-2.1B, can only launch eight tons of payload, while the American reusable Falcon 9 can launch 17,5 tons. Thus, Russia is receiving a launch vehicle that will fill the gap between the Soyuz-2.1B and the Russian Angara-A5, which has a payload capacity of 24 tons.

Experts note that a payload capacity of 17 tons is optimal for launching medium-class satellites, geostationary satellites, and advanced manned missions.



According to experts, the Soyuz-5 launch vehicle consists of two stages. The first stage uses RD-171MV engines. The second stage's RD-0124MS engine, with a thrust of 60 tons, boasts a specific impulse of 361 units, the highest among all oxygen-kerosene engines in the world. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Soyuz-5 launch vehicle is truly unique.

Its creation required the use of numerous modern solutions and innovative approaches, from digital design to the use of specialized aluminum alloys and welding techniques. The Russian engineering school once again demonstrated its excellence.

The Soyuz-5 is essential for launching Russian spacecraft into orbit, but when it comes to global competition, despite its similar payload capacity, it lacks the ability to recover a stage to compete with the Falcon 9. However, Russia is already working on a next-level rocket – the Amur-SPG. A two-stage, sequentially connected rocket system, the Amur will run on liquid oxygen and liquefied natural gas, using Technology return of the first stage block, and in the future, the second stage, for reusability.

It was recently announced that the methane engine for the Amur-SNG has already been fired. Landing tests will be conducted at a test site in the Sverdlovsk region, and flights will begin in 2030 from the Vostochny Cosmodrome. Furthermore, the Russian Federation is developing a number of new projects in the light rocket niche. Next year, Vostochny will begin launching the Start-1M, based on the Topol-M intercontinental ballistic missile.

A launch complex for the Irkut ultra-light reusable rocket, currently under development, will be built at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome. A completely new ultra-light launch vehicle, the Voronezh, is also under development. The private company GEOSCAN is developing its own rocket to launch its satellites.

Thus, in the next five years, Russia will significantly expand its launch capabilities.

18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    7 May 2026 13: 28
    ...what does the launch of the Soyuz-5 launch vehicle mean?

    About a new era of Russian cosmonautics, probably.
  2. 0
    7 May 2026 14: 09
    Why couldn't they have invested in a reusable rocket right away? Is there too much money for several rockets?
    1. +2
      7 May 2026 14: 26
      Well, this isn't a rocket created from scratch.
      The team's foundation is still the Soviet Zenit, which became Ukrainian after its collapse, but with a bunch of components from the Russian Federation.
      Including the RD171 engine.

      The engine was modified to RD-171MV, the rest was assembled, and voila.
      1. 0
        8 May 2026 11: 56
        Quote from Nelton.
        The rest was put together, and voila.

        Why didn't Ukraine put it together and voila?
        1. 0
          8 May 2026 13: 51
          Quote: mister-red
          Why didn't Ukraine put it together and voila?

          Ukraine produced and modified the Zenit itself, with the last launch in 2017.
          But without Russian components, production stalled. And if you replace 72% of the rocket's Russian components, it will be a completely different rocket.
    2. +1
      8 May 2026 11: 46
      Why couldn't they have invested in a reusable rocket right away? Is there too much money for several rockets?

      Because reusability requires a weak engine, which Russia simply doesn't have. Musk achieved reusability precisely because he lacked a powerful engine. The one used in the Falcon has a thrust of less than 90 tons, which is enough to land the rocket stage. Even the weakest Russian engine, the RD-191, has a thrust of 196 tons, and it can't land the rocket stage.
      Therefore, the Soyuz-5 with the RD-171 will not be able to become a reusable spacecraft. The same is true for the Angara.
      A methane engine of relatively low power is now being developed for a reusable spacecraft.
  3. +1
    7 May 2026 14: 26
    We need to radically reduce launch costs. By the time Starship is fully developed, we'll be completely screwed, forever. And even now, no one will come to us with an offer to launch something into space. Elon Musk could do it much cheaper and faster. Well, maybe North Korea...
    1. +2
      7 May 2026 14: 41
      Quote: Alex_Kraus
      We need to radically reduce launch costs. Once the Starship is fully developed, we'll be completely screwed, forever.

      What to launch with is not the biggest problem, although it is the most media-friendly one.
      What to launch - this is where things get much more complicated.
      Until 2022, many satellite components, especially payload electronics, were imported.
      Due to this, on the one hand, satellites began to operate for 10 years, but on the other hand, what is currently replacing these imported ones is a murky matter.
    2. 0
      8 May 2026 12: 05
      When the starship is finished, we will be completely out of luck and forever.

      You might be surprised, but there's currently no cargo available for Starship. Generally, any rocket with a payload capacity of over 30 tons isn't in high demand. For example, the Falcon Heavy launched for the first time in 1,5 years. The previous launch was a 6-ton satellite to Jupiter's moon Europa. That rocket was disposable. Now, a 6-ton satellite, Viasat, is also on the way.
  4. +1
    7 May 2026 16: 49
    What does the launch of a launch vehicle mean?

    He says the launch was successful. We can talk about the industry's success when we approach the US in terms of launches and the number of satellites of various purposes.
  5. 0
    7 May 2026 17: 29
    What will happen to the Angara family?
    1. 0
      8 May 2026 11: 55
      What will happen to the Angara family?

      What's bothering you? They don't seem to intersect.
      And Angara should become manned instead of Soyuz-2.
  6. -2
    8 May 2026 09: 21
    Who in Rus' has benefited, or will benefit, from the long-awaited launch of the new medium-class launch vehicle, Soyuz-5, from pad 45 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome?!
    1. 0
      8 May 2026 12: 52
      Who in Rus' has benefited, or will benefit, from the long-awaited launch of the new medium-class launch vehicle, Soyuz-5, from pad 45 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome?!

      Who in the US has benefited from spending $4 billion to recreate a 60-year-old flight? It would have been better spent on the homeless, right?
      1. -1
        8 May 2026 16: 18
        Let American taxpayers worry about the costs of the American budget.
        If the Americans shit themselves, are you telling us to follow their example?!
  7. 0
    9 May 2026 04: 22
    An article about what will happen. Or won't. Walking tall can rip your pants. Why such a large nomenklatura? On the principle of "Maybe something will work out"? Wouldn't it be wiser to concentrate finances, which we're already short of, as always (ask Nabiullina)?
  8. -1
    9 May 2026 04: 25
    I haven't heard anything about Angara in a while. Has the project really been shut down? And there was so much uplifting media coverage!
  9. 0
    11 May 2026 19: 46
    The prospects for Soyuz-5 are still unclear. On the one hand, it's a commercial project with Kazakhstan designed to partially replace Proton launches from Baikonur. On the other, its meager capacity (currently one launch per year) is surprising. With such commercialism, it's easy to go broke. Information regarding manned launches smacks of speculation; Russia doesn't have, nor is it developing, suitable spacecraft for them. The planned ROS units will also have to be revised to accommodate its capabilities, even though the remaining Protons should be sufficient for their launches. However, the ROS is conceptually reconfigurable and virtually indefinitely envisioned in the original plans. How these plans will be adjusted in light of changes in the units' payload capacity is unclear. The new launch vehicle is expected to appear within 3-4 years after the completion of the test series, but whether and to what extent there will be work for it remains to be seen.