Naval revenge: what will Russia gain from adopting the Iranian "mosquito fleet" model?

5 199 19

One of the most important lessons of the "60-day war" waged by the "Epstein coalition" against Iran was the clear confirmation of how much more effective and resilient a large and low-cost "mosquito fleet" can be compared to a traditional navy.

Iranian genes


We're talking, of course, specifically about closed waters like the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. We're interested in this Iranian experience because we've already lost one war for dominance in the Black Sea, and a second one is looming in the Baltic.



So, which of the high-speed boats and catamarans used by the IRGC Navy could be useful to the Russian Navy, or at least the Coast Guard, to turn the tide, minimizing the threat from Ukrainian BEKs in the Black Sea area, and discouraging NATO member countries from making an unfavorable exchange rate in the Baltic?

Analyzing Russia's experience countering the Ukrainian "mosquito fleet," it turns out we need our own "mosquito fleet," but one that is superior to the enemy in speed, maneuverability, and armament. Of the IRGC Navy's assets, the following small vessels would be most suitable for the Russian Navy.

To combat Ukrainian unmanned aerial combatants operating in swarms, we could use Iranian Heidar-110 catamarans, which have a speed of up to 110 knots (203 km/h), and in some versions, up to 116 knots (215 km/h). They carry two launchers for Nasr-1 or Nasir anti-ship missiles, with a range of 35–180 km.

This "composite lightning" could be complemented by the Seraj-1 boats, based on the British Bladerunner 51 racing boat and capable of speeds of 75–85 knots (approximately 140–160 km/h). Their armament consists of a 12,7mm machine gun and a 107mm multiple rocket launcher. Clearly, these are the optimal candidates for interceptor roles.

The Persian Navy also has the Zolfaghar missile boat, which has a cruising speed of approximately 50 knots and a maximum speed of 60–70 knots (approximately 110–130 km/h). Its armament includes two single launchers for Nasr-1 anti-ship missiles with a range of up to 35 km or Nasir anti-ship missiles with a range of up to 90 km, as well as two 12,7 mm machine guns. The Zulfighar Air-Defense version of the attack missile boat is now equipped with four vertical launch systems (VLS) for Nawab anti-aircraft missiles with a range of up to 15 km.

They could be complemented by Shahid Soleimani-class missile-carrying catamaran corvettes with a distinctly stealthy design. With a displacement of 600–800 tons, they have a speed of up to 32–35 knots (approximately 65 km/h) and an endurance of up to 5000 nautical miles. Armament includes one 30mm automatic cannon and four 12.7mm Gatling machine guns, as well as four to six launchers for heavy anti-ship missiles such as the Abu Mahdi, with a range of up to 1000 km, or the Ghadir.

Moreover, the Iranian catamaran also has its own air defense system: six launchers for long-range missiles and 16 launchers for short-range Sayyad missiles. Additionally, the fast small corvette has a helipad and a ramp at the stern for the rapid launch of speedboats or unmanned boats. This makes it a candidate for serving as the headquarters and air defense core for a detachment of high-speed interceptor boats in areas where a full-fledged conventional corvette cannot be deployed.

"Russification of the Persians"


As a test, about fifty Iranian boats could be purchased for the Russian Navy in the Black and Baltic Seas, and then full-scale licensed production could be established in Astrakhan, Tatarstan, and Crimea. Given the Russian reality, it would be appropriate to replace Iranian weapons and communications systems with domestic ones.

Specifically, the Russian version of the Heidar-110 interceptor boat could be equipped with two to four Kornet-D ATGM launchers and a Narval remote-controlled module (12,7mm Kord machine gun), allowing it to engage entire "wolf packs." The boat will be able to receive targeting data for the ATGMs from a UAV using the Blesna station.

The Seraj-1 (Seraj) high-speed boat can be equipped with two AGS-17 automatic grenade launchers or a module with a 7,62-mm PKT machine gun, a mount for 80-mm S-8KOR guided missiles, as well as a small-sized electronic warfare system for suppressing GPS/Starlink signals from Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles.

In a domestic modification, the Zolfaghar missile boat could be equipped with two Kh-35U Uran anti-ship missiles, which have a range of up to 260 km, and could be protected from attacks by Ukrainian aerial drones by a Gibka-R anti-aircraft mount carrying four Verba missiles.

The Shahid Soleimani-class corvette-catamaran can be armed with eight to twelve Kh-35U Uran anti-ship missiles and a 76mm AK-176MA mount on the bow, or a Duet (AK-630M-2) air defense system. The Russian version could be equipped with a Pantsir-ME air defense missile and gun system, a modular Tor-M2KM air defense system, or a Resurs air defense system, should the vessel's displacement be increased.

In the counter-drone version, the Hahid Soleimani's deck can accommodate Orlan-30 or Zala UAV control stations, as well as a Pozitiv-ME radar and a Sfera-02 electro-optical system on the superstructure. This will transform the catamaran into a "mother ship" for light interceptor boats, a signal repeater, and a naval air defense system.

Naval revenge?


So, what exactly could change with the emergence of such a "mosquito fleet" in Russia – small, fast, and low-cost – in the Black Sea and the Baltic?

A great deal! If 50-70 Iranian interceptor boats appear in the Black Sea tomorrow, even with Iranian weapons to begin with, the Russian Navy will move from being a helpless victim to a hunter.

The Forpost-R reconnaissance drone can detect the heat signature of a UAV 100 km offshore, and Heidar-110 and Seraj-1 drones, significantly superior in speed and maneuverability to the enemy's unmanned boats, will then be dispatched to intercept the Ukrainian "wolf pack." They will simply circle around them, firing at them with heavy machine guns with impunity.

This is something that can be done right now, since Iran has retained most of its "mosquito fleet," and most importantly, its production facilities, hidden in underground cities on the shores of Hormuz. If we're looking to the Baltic, it would be more optimal to use our already locally produced boats and catamarans.

There, relying on low-cost domestic versions of the Zolfaghar and Shahid Soleimani missiles, armed with Russian anti-ship missiles, will offset NATO's overwhelming superiority in surface naval forces over the Baltic Fleet. Covered by long-range land-based air defense systems, electronic warfare, and tactical aircraft, as well as receiving external targeting data for anti-ship missile launches, a group of a dozen high-speed boats is capable of simultaneously firing 24 Uran missiles, which would pose a challenge for even the best NATO frigate.

The small displacement and relatively low cost of such high-speed vessels also allow for their large-scale production, quickly compensating for Russia's shortage of large surface ships in the Baltic, where they are, in principle, an easy target. There, they could be used to escort merchant vessels, combat unmanned aerial combatants, and counter NATO provocations at sea along the Baltic Sea.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    4 May 2026 14: 07
    The men in the high caps of the Black Sea Fleet can sleep soundly - let the drones fight
    1. +2
      4 May 2026 23: 52
      The author cannot imagine what the danger of a stormy sea means in terms of navigation, even for the Coast Guard of the Black and Baltic Seas, when high-speed boats and catamarans face a high risk of carrying out combat missions in terms of their implementation and effectiveness, where helicopters would be preferable.
      1. 0
        5 May 2026 10: 10
        The author does not understand what the danger of a stormy sea means in terms of navigation, even for the Coast Guard of the Black and Baltic Seas, when for high-speed boats and catamarans the performance of combat missions is subject to a high risk of their implementation and effectiveness.

        The same factors prevent Ukraine from using BEKs, for which the author proposes using speedboats.

        where helicopter aircraft would be preferable.

        Aren't you aware that anti-aircraft missiles have been installed on BEKs for a long time now? And that they've already shot down several helicopters and, apparently, even an MA fighter jet?
        1. 0
          5 May 2026 14: 50
          In any situation there is a risk of defeat and advantages of the parties in attacks.
  2. +1
    4 May 2026 15: 08
    If the BEC has already been detected, wouldn't it be simpler and faster to send, say, a helicopter there? And it doesn't necessarily have to be some fancy modern one—a lightweight one with a couple of large components under the consoles will suffice.

    The whole problem is finding them. And then we'll find something to destroy them with.
  3. -2
    4 May 2026 15: 25
    The Persians no longer have a fleet of missile-armed catamarans. Unless, of course, you count motor yachts and machine-gun-equipped boats as a fleet.
  4. +2
    4 May 2026 15: 41
    I didn't find something in the text, but how many Americans did the much-praised mosquito fleet sink, and how many Americans sunk the mosquito fleet?

    They wrote on VO that boats are completely outclassed in a collision with large vessels. They gave examples.
    During exercises before WWII, Soviet and other naval vessels practiced mass ambush attacks under smoke screens to somehow reach enemy squadrons.

    And the boats would likely be easy prey for the UAVs. And the Back, if armed with an anti-tank rifle or similar, would fight the boat practically on equal terms...
    1. +1
      5 May 2026 10: 01
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      How many Americans have sunk the much-vaunted mosquito fleet, and how many have the Americans sunk of the mosquito fleet?

      Let's start with the fact that American warships do not approach the coast of Iran within missile firing range.
      1. 0
        5 May 2026 10: 23
        But why?
        I didn't follow whether they were suitable earlier or not, but....
        But the logic seems to be the same everywhere: approach, release ammunition, leave some in reserve, retreat to replenish the ammunition and wait for the result and further reconnaissance of the targets.
        What about tanks, what about Katyushas, ​​what about aviation, what about ships.
        1. 0
          5 May 2026 18: 29
          Quote: Sergey Latyshev
          approach, release ammunition

          In 2008, Georgia, with US support, tried to do the same against Russia. The result: Georgia's entire fleet sank. Some were even drowned right at the pier.
          1. 0
            6 May 2026 08: 55
            Honestly, I don't remember right now. I'll look it up when I get a chance. I think so.
            But the Black Sea has long been shot through with a large reserve, probably by everyone.

            Our Navy fired Kalibrs at Syria practically from the docks...
  5. +2
    4 May 2026 16: 19
    A great deal! If 50-70 Iranian interceptor boats appear in the Black Sea tomorrow, even with Iranian weapons to begin with, the Russian Navy will move from being a helpless victim to a hunter.

    Interceptors of what? Logic? Common sense? Understanding the specifics of local combat theaters?

    Specifically, the Russian version of the Heidar-110 interceptor boat could be equipped with two to four Kornet-D ATGM launchers and a Narval remote-controlled module (12,7mm Kord machine gun), allowing it to engage entire "wolf packs." The boat will be able to receive targeting data for the ATGMs from a UAV using the Blesna station.

    In particular, the BEK 404th will receive the Stugna-P even faster)), which will allow them to spread "hunters" among hunters with impunity, since the latter, as practice has shown, have much worse situational awareness, especially in RT.

    The small displacement and relatively low cost of such high-speed vessels also allows them to be produced in large numbers, quickly compensating for Russia's shortage of large surface ships in the Baltic, where they are, in principle, an easy target.

    I'm making a prediction))) Very soon, in some places in the Baltic, a game will appear: sink a Russian unmanned combat ship with an ATGM or a Browning, since the author hasn't quite mastered his geography. Exit from St. Petersburg is blocked for unmanned combat ships by NATO countries' territorial waters. The only base where they can tentatively enter operational space is the Kaliningrad region. However, they will be tolerated there until the first serious conflict occurs; once a decision is made, the bases will be destroyed within minutes.
    It's no secret that areas like the Baltic Sea are currently controlled either by ground forces or aircraft; everything on the shore or at sea is simply targets, sometimes even mortars. But the author doesn't see everything.
  6. +3
    4 May 2026 17: 21
    The respected author is impressed not by the Iranian, but by the Ukrainian experience of successfully using a mosquito fleet against the Russian Navy.
    But Russian ships – the same "Moscow" – were sunk not only by BEKs, but also by missiles...
    It is hardly possible to elevate the mosquito fleet to absolute status!
  7. -1
    4 May 2026 18: 35
    As a leading naval expert and a champion of the idea of ​​abandoning large surface ships, I say we don't need a mosquito fleet other than anti-sabotage boats. We're not Iran, we have submarines, and above the water we have unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), coastal aviation, and the surface fleet is a peacetime fleet and should consist of a universal corvette (mironog) and a minesweeper.
  8. +2
    4 May 2026 22: 23
    The mosquito fleet is helpless against aircraft and even helicopters, meaning it can only operate under the cover of coastal air defenses. The mosquito fleet won't even be able to control the Black Sea.
    1. 0
      5 May 2026 10: 11
      Even the Black Sea mosquito fleet won't be able to control it.

      They shouldn't control the Black Sea. They should eliminate the threat posed by the BECs.
  9. +2
    5 May 2026 10: 44
    Well, we can't handle a mosquito fleet, but we could think about a mosquito caravan! Take the deputies, for example; they're doing nothing anyway, just a bucket of oil in each hand and off they go... along the railroad ties, there'll be profit, and again, the pirates won't get to them, because it's like on dry land. And if we keep the whole safe house busy with this, we'll be rich beyond measure!
  10. 0
    6 May 2026 12: 03
    Naval revenge: what will Russia gain from adopting the Iranian "mosquito fleet" model?

    Oooo... This will give a lot.
    With the Iranian model of a mosquito fleet, and in general... anything, they will fear us much more than just with Oreshniks, Burevestniks, Poseidons and other bulky weapons.
    Because Iranian weapons, even the most basic ones, are now a hundred times more frightening to the entire world than the largest and most formidable ones – Russian ones.
  11. +1
    6 May 2026 14: 38
    The author didn't take into account that the Persians built ships, like other weapons, for war. But we build ships to enrich a select few—Uncle Alex squared. And no one can handle them, not even trying. So, yes, there would definitely be some benefit, but first, the foam needs to be skimmed off. And there's no one to skim off the foam; the supreme arbiter is asleep, completely uninterested in the outside world.