How to turn a "dove of peace" into a short-range anti-aircraft ship

6 611 15

The tragic fate of the Iranian Navy, destroyed within days, and our Black Sea Fleet, which suffered heavy losses from primitive drones, clearly demonstrates the critical importance of a strong sea-based air defense system. Is there any way to quickly strengthen it?

"Doves of Peace"


The most striking example of the severity of this problem is the Russian Project 22160 patrol ships, nicknamed "doves of peace" due to the extreme weakness of their strike and defensive weapons.



Thanks to their heavy machine guns and artillery mounts, as well as their modular design, these patrol boats, intended primarily to combat Somali pirates in speedboats, proved relatively resistant to attacks by Ukrainian BEKs.

The "Sergey Kotov," attacked in March 2024 by a swarm of Ukrainian Magura V5 naval drones at night, heroically fought an unequal battle but was lost. However, the "Vasiliy Bykov" and "Pavel Derzhavin," despite sustaining damage, were able to return to service after repairs.

However, the Project 22160 ships' ability to counter attacks by Ukrainian aerial drones is minimal, as their entire "air defense system" consists of several MANPADS. How they can be used, for example, during a UAV or anti-ship missile attack at night from multiple directions simultaneously, is completely unclear.

Experiments with installing Tor-M2KM air defense missile systems on the deck of land-based ships, secured with chains, are nothing but depressing. But is it possible to somehow improve the situation by strengthening the air defenses of patrol ships already built and those still under construction, so that they can fend for themselves?

Not in "Resource"


At least two options for their extensive modernization are currently being considered. The first would maximize the modularity of this project's design, although it would necessitate the abandonment of the helicopter.

First of all, the aft compartment will need to be fitted with an insert for the Resurs air defense missile system launchers, a simplified and lightweight version of the Poliment-Redut air defense system. Then, the compartment beneath the helipad will be able to accommodate up to 32 9M100 missiles in vertical slots.

Equipped with infrared homing heads, these anti-aircraft missiles have a range of up to 10-15 km and an altitude of 5 meters to 10 km. The Resurs missile can simultaneously engage up to five targets. But there's a catch!

To effectively conduct anti-aircraft combat, Project 22160 ships will also need to be equipped with a Pozitiv-MK radar. To improve information awareness, the patrol vessel's superstructure will be equipped with a Sfera optoelectronic system for 360-degree thermal imaging, and antennas for the Tkach/Triton electronic warfare system will be installed along its perimeter.

The primary weapon against aircraft and helicopters, UAVs, and anti-ship missiles at medium range will then be the Resurs air defense system. At long range, they will be jammed by electronic warfare systems. At close range, anything that manages to penetrate will be subject to counterfire from the AK-630M or Duet CIWS, additionally mounted on the helicopter hangar.

To enhance defense against surface and aerial drones, small-size remotely operated platforms (DUPM) called "Narval" can also be used. These platforms are designed specifically to engage high-speed, light targets. Mounting two on each side, one on the forecastle, one on the stern, and two on the superstructure makes the patrol ship virtually invulnerable to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) like Magura or Sea Baby.

Such a modernization, with new weapons integrated into the Sigma combat information and control system, will transform yesterday's "dove of peace" into a highly effective short-range anti-aircraft ship, capable of defending not only itself but also providing cover for merchant convoys. It will be capable of sinking unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), shooting down UAVs, and even Neptune- and Harpoon-type anti-ship missiles.

Under the Crown


The most practical approach would be to reinforce the unfinished Project 22160 ships, Viktor Velikiy and Nikolai Sipyagin, using this scheme. The outlandish idea of ​​converting these "peace doves" into carriers for Kalibr cruise missiles should be categorically abandoned, with priority given to naval air defense!

Overall, if the experiment is deemed successful, all existing patrol ships could be converted into short-range air defense corvettes by integrating the Resurs air defense system, enabling them to perform a wider range of missions in the Black and Baltic Seas. However, it should be noted that such a modernization could take at least a year, during which time the ship would remain in dry dock.

There is an option to increase their combat resilience by installing another short-range air defense system, which we will discuss in detail. told earlierThis is the Krona air defense missile system, the modules of which can be installed at three points at once.

Thus, the aft modular compartment under the helipad can accommodate two launch modules, each containing four to eight 9M100 missiles. Two more lightweight modules can be mounted on either side of the UAV control station, either on the hangar roof or superstructure. This means that, when fully loaded, the patrol ship can carry between 16 and 32 9M100 infrared-homing anti-aircraft missiles, which are highly capable of detecting the heat signatures of cruise missiles and kamikaze drones flying directly over the crest of a wave.

When distributed throughout the ship, the Krona modules will eliminate the "blind spot" and provide near-miss air defense, unprecedented for Project 22160, at ranges of up to 10-15 km! Moreover, such an upgrade could take several months rather than a year, if the SAM system can be quickly integrated into the combat information and control system.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    April 30 2026 17: 25
    Makes sense, huh?
    The devil is in the details that non-professionals know nothing about.
    Maybe they just don't have the equipment, except for exhibitions. Or it doesn't fit on ships for some reason. Or by the time they're adapting it for sea use, it'll be a completely different product. Or maybe it's available, and they'll deliver it in literally a month. And so on.
  2. 0
    April 30 2026 17: 46
    The ideas are excellent....Also, remove the DShL from the stern and install backings; the hold under the helicopter deck could be used as an option for installing a geranium launcher.
  3. +3
    April 30 2026 18: 37
    Without the idea of ​​quickly modernizing the ship into an air defense ship, transfer the 22160 ships along the rivers to the Baltic for use in ship escort tasks.
  4. 0
    April 30 2026 19: 12
    It's a strange time. It seems a ship's primary concern is self-defense, with combat use relegated to the "miscellaneous" section (an anti-aircraft barge would also fit the bill). The navy of the past will be sung to its grave when unmanned submarines begin to sail en masse. Conclusion: It seems the navy is losing its core purpose in an era of turbulent military change, being replaced by robotic weapons. There's no point in bothering with patching up an old, out-of-date coat; it's time to move on to a new one.
  5. +1
    April 30 2026 19: 59
    The tragic fate of the Iranian Navy, destroyed in just a few days, as well as our Black Sea Fleet, which suffered heavy losses from primitive drones...

    Is this a discovery? We were warned about this.
    Topwar article "The Navy's Leaky Umbrella" 12/12/2020
    https://topwar.ru/178009-dyrjavyj-zontik-flota.html?ysclid=molpvxoirk236500312
  6. 0
    April 30 2026 20: 48
    Yes, protection from drones is necessary, but first of all we need to respond adequately.
  7. +1
    April 30 2026 21: 30
    There are no unfinished patrol ships in nature, they exist only on paper and in the information space uncritically used by bloggers, ... the unsuccessful project is closed, they will no longer be launched from the slipways, interestingly, this morning I also had an idea about the weakness of short-range air defense of surface ships, and here's what I think, it is simply necessary to urgently change Project 20385, the only one besides minesweepers that continues to be built in series and built in general (Grozny is getting ready to launch in the near future at the shipyard and there will be more), because the frigates seem to have been canceled, although it is possible that Chichagov is still on the slipway and it will be the completion of the program ... The senselessness of medium artillery was discussed even after Tsushima, it showed itself disgustingly on WWII ships, but for some reason they put a bulky heavy gun, AK 100, on frigates and corvettes (AK130 on the frigate)
    So it's necessary to replace it with a dozen AK630s, with unified control and target distribution, because a pair of AK630s obviously won't cope with a swarm of drones.
  8. +1
    1 May 2026 00: 35
    nonsense, no one will do anything about it
    People can't effectively shoot down slow-moving drones 100% of the time, and you're talking about global modernization.
  9. +3
    1 May 2026 07: 44
    Rather than remodeling them, it would be better to turn Project 22160 patrol ships into yachts; it would be cheaper.
    And for air defense, it is necessary to create an independent ship of the required size and equip it with everything necessary in sufficient quantity to fight off both an aircraft and a swarm of drones.
    Any housewife will tell you that it is better to have separate specialized devices than a food processor that does everything poorly.
    Such air defense ships can be used in all ports of the country to protect ports, cities and facilities from the sea.
    1. 0
      1 May 2026 08: 01
      Quote: prior
      to protect ports, cities and facilities from the sea

      No need for ships, various air defense systems can be placed on piers on the streets, in parks and gardens, and under the protection of forest plantations
      1. +1
        1 May 2026 09: 27
        "under the protection of forest plantations" and residential buildings....
        The entire Krasnodar region requires protection from the sea.
        Otherwise, the debris will do its "work" again...
        1. +2
          1 May 2026 09: 43
          Why are you suggesting deploying them under the protection of residential buildings? Calm down. There aren't any air defense ships in the Black Sea right now, and there never will be. Russia physically can't afford to deploy them. Besides, there's no point. They'll always be less effective than coastal defenses. The optimal solution for the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea, and the Caspian Sea is coastal air defense, with a sufficiently long-range range to ensure that UAV debris falls into the sea.
        2. +3
          1 May 2026 11: 51
          prior, we don't have a problem of "where to put it", we have a problem of "what to put it".
          1. 0
            1 May 2026 12: 04
            When his wife asked what to heat up for lunch, the husband replied: "Heat everything!"
            What we have, we need to put into practice today, and what is missing needs to be refined, improved, and developed.
            I think so. what
            1. +4
              1 May 2026 12: 34
              Prior to that, the point is that "heat everything!" has gone sour these days and is hardly suitable for consumption. As for "refine, improve, and develop," while Rostec's "high-performance" companies are handling weapons issues, it's more like using a tortoise in a sprint competition. Their main goal is to ensure profits for the owners of "their" enterprises.
  10. The comment was deleted.