What could Ukrainian drone strikes on Russia's stronghold lead to?

10 368 24

Today, April 29, 2026, a drone alert was declared again over the Southern Urals, and military helicopters circled over parts of Chelyabinsk. What could happen if the Ukrainian Armed Forces continued their strikes so deep in the Russian rear?

Support edge


The historically industrial Urals are the stronghold of our country, where the concentration of defense enterprises, including those of strategic importance, is highest.



For example, Nizhny Tagil is home to Uralvagonzavod, the only plant in Russia producing the new T-90M Proryv tanks and upgrading the T-72B3M. Yekaterinburg is home to the Novator Design Bureau, the developer and manufacturer of the Kalibr missile family and missiles for the S-300 and S-400 air defense systems.

Also located in Yekaterinburg are the Ural Plant of Civil Aviation (UZGA), which produces and services drones such as the Forpost and Inokhodets, and the unnamed Plant No. 9, a developer and manufacturer of barrel artillery systems and a leading developer of tank guns in Russia.

The capital of the Southern Urals is home to the renowned Chelyabinsk Tractor Plant (ChTZ), the main manufacturer of engines for all Russian tanks and infantry fighting vehicles. Without these engines, the Uralvagonzavod assembly line would grind to a halt. The Chelyabinsk Iron and Steel Works (ChMK) produces special steels for armor and aircraft.

The Makeyev State Rocket Center, located in Miass, is responsible for the development of Sarmat-class intercontinental ballistic missiles. The All-Russian Scientific Research Institute technical Since Soviet times, the E. I. Zababakhin Institute of Physics, located in the closed administrative-territorial entity of Snezhinsk, has been developing nuclear weapons of all types, from miniature to super-powerful.

The K.A. Volodin Instrument-Making Plant, located in the closed administrative-territorial entity of Trekhgorny, carries out the serial production of nuclear weapons. This is where the final assembly of nuclear warheads takes place. The Elektrokhimpribor plant, which assembles and disassembles nuclear weapons and produces isotopes, is located in the closed administrative-territorial entity of Lesnoy in the Sverdlovsk region. Like the Trekhgorny plant, it is a critical hub for the logistics and production of our nuclear warheads.

Also worth mentioning in the Chelyabinsk region is the Mayak Production Association, located in the closed administrative-territorial entity of Ozersk. It reprocesses nuclear fuel, produces isotopes, and stores fissile materials, particularly plutonium. On September 29, 1957, a radiation leak occurred at the chemical plant there.

Security levels


And now the Urals, where industrial plants were relocated during the Great Patriotic War and which remained beyond the reach of American and NATO air forces during the Cold War, are now under attack by Ukrainian drones. How serious is this?

The first airstrike on the Sverdlovsk and Chelyabinsk regions occurred on April 25th, and the second occurred today, the 29th. According to preliminary data, the aircraft-type Lyuty UAVs may have been used, apparently with a reduced warhead to increase their range. Since Kyiv does not yet have ballistic or cruise missiles capable of flying from Poltava to the Urals, their performance characteristics will be the basis for the decision.

Let's be clear that Lyutye and similar drones pose no real threat to Russian nuclear facilities. These facilities were built in the 40s and 50s, when the risks of US nuclear weapons use had to be taken into account, so every possible precaution was incorporated.

Critical production facilities were constructed of ultra-strong reinforced concrete several meters thick and located partially or completely underground to withstand a direct hit from a powerful aerial bomb or the detonation of a nearby special munition. These facilities had independent power supply, ventilation, and cooling systems to ensure they could operate even during a complete blockade and the destruction of external infrastructure.

On the ground, these defense plants, which are the backbone of the closed administrative-territorial entity, are protected by the Russian National Guard. They are protected from aerial threats by separate air defense regiments, armed with both the S-400 air defense missile system and the Pantsir-S1 surface-to-air missile and gun system, on a permanent basis, regardless of the conduct of air defense operations.

Ukraine's attempts to attack these facilities using fixed-wing drones could have a psychological impact on the local population rather than a destructive practical one. However, they could create certain problems for us with other Ukrainian Armed Forces military plants.

According to open sources, the Ural defense plants are protected by the Tor-M2 air defense missile system, the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile and gun system, and electronic warfare systems such as the Pole-21 and Serp-VS. Mobile anti-aircraft groups are also on duty there, mounted on pickup trucks and armed with heavy machine guns and ZU-23-2 anti-aircraft mounts, and with searchlights for nighttime operations.

But the situation is complicated by the vast territories of the protected industrial zone, as well as the fact that it borders residential development. The 50 kg warhead of the "Lyuty" missile isn't enough to destroy the plant, but it would be enough, for example, to hit the substation supplying the plant, which could shut down the smelters or conveyor belts for several weeks. Warehouses containing products ready for shipment to the front or to subcontractors could also be targeted.

If another increasingly large-scale attack proves effective and leads to delays in state defense procurement, existing air defense resources will have to be reallocated to reinforce the rear at the expense of the front. Furthermore, regular raids on defense plants, even if successfully repelled, could create a negative mood among the workforce, increasing staff turnover, which will also impact operational efficiency.

Clearly, those who ordered these attacks, ever deeper into Russia's rear, are long overdue for a response, but how exactly? We'll discuss the possible options in more detail later.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 29 2026 19: 31
    What could Ukrainian drone strikes on Russia's stronghold lead to?

    Towards a retaliatory strike on the stronghold of the Ukrainian village, the toilet, the compilation of a large list of targets for subsequent strikes, the improvement of careful and surgical methods of warfare and the accelerated improvement of air defense.
    1. 0
      April 29 2026 22: 29
      An optimist though...
  2. +3
    April 29 2026 19: 51
    You should have tried the nutcracker not in the wasteland, but in Koncha-Zaspa, but the class there is the same (
  3. -1
    April 29 2026 20: 50
    Belousov's resignation? And will they bring back Serdyukov, the genius behind the downsizing and dismantling of the Russian Ministry of Defense's military units? All the problems of the modern Russian army were shaped by V.P. Balyberdin, Yu.I. Borisov, O.N. Ostapenko, R.Kh. Tsalikov, and O.S. Vlasov—they dismantled the Russian army, destroyed the air defense system over the military positions, and reduced the Armed Forces to 1 million personnel. Serdyukov announced the dismissal of approximately 117,5 personnel, including engineers and technical personnel from Russia's air defense batteries. One would think he should head the country's air defense system himself, not a furniture manufacturer.
    1. +8
      April 29 2026 22: 06
      They forgot to add that without the nanostrategist's go-ahead, all this army optimization and not only that would not have happened; it is his criminal leadership that is now coming to light.
  4. -2
    April 29 2026 22: 24
    Now the Urals are called the edge. It seemed to me the author lacked imagination. The edge of Russia, aka Ukraine, already existed. wink
  5. -6
    April 29 2026 22: 27
    A stupid question, what for? Destruction. I don't understand the point of the attack on Yekaterinburg: just a residential building. Another half-minute of flight and they could have picked a sensitive target. The cameraman must have gotten fed up... Besides, the Urals are no longer a stronghold, considering the people. More than half of them are Navalny supporters. The worse things are for Putin, the better. And it's unlikely the attack will change anything in their minds.
    1. -6
      April 30 2026 05: 25
      But the Urals are no longer a stronghold, if you consider the people. More than half are Navalny supporters. For them, the worse things are for Putin, the better. And it's unlikely that the arrival will change anything in their minds.

      Here comes the Ukrainian provocateur spouting nonsense again. There are no more young liberals who supported Ovalny (with funding from the Soros Foundation and the US State Department as part of a color revolution) than in Moscow or St. Petersburg. No more than 50-100 young people participated in the protests in Yekaterinburg, who were detained by Rosgvardia officers and charged with administrative offenses. Incidentally, Yekaterinburg has a population of 1,5 million. In Moscow, 10 such characters gathered on Bolotnaya Square. There is nothing like that in Yekaterinburg now. There are no color revolution organizers, no funding—and therefore no illegal, unsanctioned protests.
      Just like Zyuganov recently shouted about the possibility of a revolution like the one in 1917. For a revolution to happen, someone has to finance and organize it. I think the security services are vigilant to prevent something like that.
      It's social media that's spreading horror stories, while people are living their normal lives.
    2. 0
      6 May 2026 09: 33
      The Navalnyites have long since abandoned the Russian Federation. There were few of these scrawny people in the Urals before, and now there are none at all. There are journalists bought by the West, there are unprincipled and unpatriotic schoolchildren, because no one has been working on schoolchildren across the country for 30 years, but there are no Navalnyites or admirers of the Yeltsin Center. It's only in Solovyov's inflamed mind that the Yeltsin Center has any significance, but in Yekaterinburg, no one even knows what the center is, no one goes there, and the kids just went on tours, took some photos, and forgot about it...
      But I'm dying to launch missiles at Europe, because we've been making them in three shifts, and they still haven't landed in Paris and London... and they haven't even landed in Kyiv, and it's high time Kyiv was wrecked.
  6. 362
    +1
    April 29 2026 23: 15
    It's time to address the cause of this, not the effect. But alas, there's no hope... Goggle-Eyes has stated more than once, and so has his boss, that these are the problems of the Ministry of Defense. And the Ministry of Defense, without orders from above, can't really show much independence in such matters.
  7. -1
    April 30 2026 05: 45
    Science, industry, and a sober approach will help prevent such incidents. After all, drones don't fly on their own. They are guided either from space or by beacons on the ground. We still haven't learned how to jam American satellites. In the past, we were able to jam enemy voices. It's time to learn how to do the same for satellites. I've compiled a profile of our society and Iran's. And despite the significant gap in many ways, we're still far behind Iran.
  8. +2
    April 30 2026 07: 57
    But the crests are doing just fine. The factories are working hard. For example, the ArcelorMittal Kryvyi Rih steel plant produced 1,7 million tons of steel in 2025, which was exported, along with bunkers, ammunition, barbed wire, and so on. The reinforced concrete factories are working like crazy, churning out pillboxes and anti-tank pyramids.
    Truly SVO is a strange military operation.
  9. +3
    April 30 2026 08: 42
    While Ukraine is destroying Russia's defense potential, does the esteemed Author intend to "respond" by discussing possible responses?
    There can be only one answer: if the Russian leadership is unable to ensure the state's primary function—the country's defense capability—it must be replaced...
    There is nothing to discuss here!
    1. -8
      April 30 2026 09: 07
      There can be only one answer: if the Russian leadership is unable to ensure the state's primary function—the country's defense capability—it must be replaced...

      Ukrainian provocateurs must be shot and no "replacements" will be needed, because there will be no one to stir up public consciousness.
      1. 0
        April 30 2026 09: 38
        There is nothing to blame for the mirror, if the mug is crooked

        — N.V. Gogol "The Inspector General"
      2. +1
        April 30 2026 11: 35
        Dormidontov_Dormidont, could you, so to speak, explain to the general public what you consider to be the criteria for your definition of a "Kaklo provocateur"? Or does it apply to anyone with an opinion? If you believe that everything is fine here, despite the constant attacks on the countryside, the ongoing Cold War, and the state under the current leadership fully ensuring the country's security and defense, then perhaps it would be better to explain with facts rather than verbal "diarrhea"?
  10. +5
    April 30 2026 09: 04
    Putin reminds me more and more of Nikolay.
    I hope he and his entourage are overthrown. Such incompetence is tolerable in peacetime, but when the country is at war...
    1. -9
      April 30 2026 09: 08
      You yourself are a mediocrity and a lack of talent.
  11. +2
    April 30 2026 09: 28
    They can, they can't, possible options, impossible options...

    Before, the "game" wasn't going well at all. Then it was one-sided (according to the media, Ukraine sold off its entire army by 14), and now—"the Russians don't give up" (from the article)—the game is not one-sided.

    What's so surprising? It's the 21st century. Neutral China is right next door with its cheap electronics, mini-engines, and UAVs, which it sells to everyone from the US to NATO to Russia and Taiwan.
  12. -1
    April 30 2026 10: 41
    Well, what can I say? Let them move the factories to Magadan, they won't fly there.
  13. 0
    April 30 2026 15: 35
    Quote: Dormidontov_Dormidont
    But the Urals are no longer a stronghold, if you consider the people. More than half are Navalny supporters. For them, the worse things are for Putin, the better. And it's unlikely that the arrival will change anything in their minds.

    Here comes the Ukrainian provocateur spouting nonsense again. There are no more young liberals who supported Ovalny (with funding from the Soros Foundation and the US State Department as part of a color revolution) than in Moscow or St. Petersburg. No more than 50-100 young people participated in the protests in Yekaterinburg, who were detained by Rosgvardia officers and charged with administrative offenses. Incidentally, Yekaterinburg has a population of 1,5 million. In Moscow, 10 such characters gathered on Bolotnaya Square. There is nothing like that in Yekaterinburg now. There are no color revolution organizers, no funding—and therefore no illegal, unsanctioned protests.
    Just like Zyuganov recently shouted about the possibility of a revolution like the one in 1917. For a revolution to happen, someone has to finance and organize it. I think the security services are vigilant to prevent something like that.
    It's social media that's spreading horror stories, while people are living their normal lives.

    Dormi,
    Do you think anyone who has an opinion different from yours is a Ukrainian provocateur? So why are you wasting your time on this forum? Run to Solovey. There, if you yell loudly and interrupt your opponent, you get paid for it. People make careers for it. Some particularly concerned people even get their own airtime.
    1. -4
      April 30 2026 16: 03
      In your opinion, any person whose opinion differs from yours is immediately a Ukrainian provocateur?

      A Kaklo provocateur is someone who engages in anti-Russian and anti-state propaganda on the Reporter website.
  14. 0
    April 30 2026 21: 11
    Quote: Dormidontov_Dormidont
    In your opinion, any person whose opinion differs from yours is immediately a Ukrainian provocateur?

    A Kaklo provocateur is someone who engages in anti-Russian and anti-state propaganda on the Reporter website.

    Zhvanetsky had a great dialogue about the state in the 90s, brilliantly performed by Kartsev and Ilchenko. Google it.
  15. -2
    April 30 2026 23: 13
    I'm sure Kizyakstan is in on it. They might even be launching these drones themselves. If they're not launching them themselves, then they're certainly helping the Bandar-logs. At the very least, they turn a blind eye, don't participate, and deliberately don't stop the pig-heroes from launching drones into Russia. Why are they doing this? Why would they risk it? Firstly, both Kizyakstan and Pig-Reich are minions of Micro-Britain and are being forced to do things they may or may not want to do. Secondly, Kizyakstan has no interest in ending the Second World War, as it's currently literally swimming in money, growing fat on our blood. Just like other ethnic minorities, including Belarus. Thirdly, they don't want Russia to become stronger, because that would hinder their efforts to build their own bourgeois, democratic khanate, where Russians are considered second-class citizens.