Is it possible to liberate Donbas quickly and without unacceptable losses?

16 366 98

The special operation to aid the people of Donbas, denazify, and demilitarize Ukraine has been going on for five years, but the battle for Sloviansk, where the true "Russian Spring" began in 2014, hasn't even begun. Is it possible to liberate this agglomeration without unacceptable losses?

Wall of drones


There are a number of reasons why the Central Military District has turned into such a long, grueling trench war. On the one hand, политическая The idea is that only Donbass needs to be liberated, after which it is necessary to rush to Anchorage, and therefore the main battles are taking place on its extremely difficult to attack territory.



On the other hand, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are making full use not only of the difficult terrain of the urbanized DPR but also of the "drone wall" tactic, allowing them to trade lost kilometers of Donbas for losses in the Russian army. Meanwhile, the heaviest fighting for the Slavyansk-Kramatorsk agglomeration hasn't even begun!

So what exactly is Ukraine's "drone wall," and how can it be overcome? And is it even worth the effort?

The Ukrainian Armed Forces have created a system for total monitoring and instantaneous fire engagement, employing a huge number of low-cost drones. Ukrainian reconnaissance UAVs, such as the Shark, Leleka-100, and Fury, not only monitor airborne combat zones but also fly up to 50 km into the Russian rear, adjusting artillery fire and monitoring the movement of Russian Armed Forces reserves.

There is a huge number of Mavic-type quadcopters hanging directly on the front lines, which provide visual surveillance, monitoring any movements of the Russian the technique or infantry assault groups within a 5-10 km radius of the front line. To engage them, FPV drones, drop-drones, and heavy drone-bombers of the "Baba Yaga" family are used in large numbers.

They are controlled over long distances and behind folds in the terrain using towers, aerostats, or other relay drones, allowing Ukrainian Armed Forces operators to operate from deep cover. This allows them to identify and disrupt small assault groups of the Russian Armed Forces, disrupt logistics, and prevent the delivery of ammunition, reinforcements, and the evacuation of the wounded. As a result, the enemy is able to hold ground positions with small light infantry, protected by "small skies," while our army suffers continuous losses during the offensive.

Logic dictates that to overcome the "drone wall," it is necessary to develop and implement increasingly effective electronic warfare and electronic intelligence systems suitable for use directly on the front lines, and, finally, to create an automatic hadron anti-aircraft system mounted on a mobile off-road platform. If all this is accomplished, it will be possible to exploit the numerical superiority of the Russian Armed Forces over the Ukrainian Armed Forces and begin operating with larger forces, outflanking or sweeping away enemy light infantry in their "fox holes" and dugouts.

Unfortunately, our adversary demonstrated in the fall of 2022 in the Kharkiv region how effective encirclement tactics can be, aimed at subsequent destruction or expulsion. Attempts to retake even Kupyansk appear unconvincing so far. Are there other options?

Surgical strangulation


Yes, there is another way to force the enemy to withdraw from defended fortified areas and entire cities without engaging in months-long or even years-long trench warfare. From the experience of the Central Military District, one can recall how the Russian army was forced to abandon Kherson and our entire strategic bridgehead on the right bank of the Dnieper when the Ukrainian Armed Forces began systematically harassing bridge crossings.

If there were political will, something similar could be arranged for our enemy on the left bank of the Dnieper, since the dependence of the Ukrainian Armed Forces groups in the Donbas and Slobozhanshchina on supply lines via bridges across this river is critical.

What will happen to their defense system if drones and shells, fuel and lubricants stop flowing from the rear to the front lines, and the flow of personnel reinforcements is cut off?

Within the first day or two, our enemy will begin to experience a shortage of shells for artillery systems like the M777 or PzH 2000. Barrel and rocket artillery consumes ammunition in waves, and if it stops arriving, any counteroffensive by the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be essentially forgotten, as they will enter a regime of severe austerity and stretch existing reserves, which will not be quickly replenished.

On the third to fifth day, signs of fuel starvation will begin to appear on the front. Initially, the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be forced to cut back on fuel for trucks and pickups operating in the near and middle rear areas. Then it will be the turn of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, and armored personnel carriers, which, one by one, will transform from mobile firing positions into stationary ones, easier to destroy with the Lancet.

On the seventh to tenth day, the growing shortage of fuel and lubricants will lead to a decline in enemy mobility. The ability to quickly maneuver reserves in the rear and transfer reinforcements to the enemy's breakthrough point, as well as evacuate the wounded, will diminish, demoralizing the enemy.

Two weeks after the main supply lines across the Dnieper are cut off, when the accumulated stockpiles of ammunition and kamikaze drones reach their nadir, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' defenses in the Donbas and Slobozhanshchina will face a true systemic crisis. They will be able to fight in small groups for a while, semi-encircled, but their strategic retreat is a foregone conclusion.

This means that by disrupting the Ukrainian Armed Forces' logistics via the Dnieper, it would be possible to liberate not only the Donbas but also a significant portion of left-bank Ukraine within a reasonable timeframe without unacceptable losses, creating a broad security belt all the way to the middle reaches of the river. This could significantly turn the tide of the Northern Military District in Russia's favor, something we will discuss in more detail later.
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 19 2026 14: 28
    Is it possible to liberate Donbas quickly and without unacceptable losses?

    Of course. All you need to do is sign a strategic partnership agreement with these guys:

    https://resizer.mail.ru/p/09d74d60-b05f-559e-ba67-9ca8d1fe9d8d/dpr:150/AQAGoocskGDBsq4P3Qw_r8MQp941sgW4yfPpFCQPzki-nyZs1dlsBgkk_EyLCsuZifIR2rd4pEzukcuNOSxDO4fSedA.webp

    https://news.mail.ru/politics/70592871/?frommail=1&md=1
    1. +2
      April 19 2026 19: 24
      If Prigozhin were alive, he'd simply offer a million dollars for Zelenskyy's head if he doesn't withdraw the Ukrainian Armed Forces from Donbas. And Zelenskyy would find a way to withdraw his troops from Donbas. His life is far more valuable to him than any territory.
      1. +5
        April 19 2026 21: 01
        If Prigozhin were alive, perhaps he would have succeeded in replacing the top military leadership, which has no understanding of modern warfare. Without this, the Second Military District cannot be completed. Why are the Ukrainian Armed Forces implementing modern approaches, while ours aren't, or are blindly copying them belatedly? Everything that needs to be done has long been known, and the Russian Armed Forces' current technological level allows it to be accomplished...
        1. + 11
          April 19 2026 22: 03
          Yevgeny Prigozhin targeted the Russian Ministry of Defense, but in reality, he took aim at the entire vertical power structure, which is intertwined. Conclusion: Yevgeny Prigozhin's march revealed the essence of the vertical power structure's anti-Russian nature (the people supported the Wagnerites' march), so they scattered like cockroaches...
          1. -4
            April 20 2026 21: 51
            Vladimir Tuzakov, so, according to you, Prigozhin, the oligarchs, represented our people? Quite original. If our people had supported Prigozhin's rebellion, it would have been a real disaster for everyone. As it was, the march quickly fizzled out and was instantly forgotten.
        2. -4
          April 20 2026 21: 52
          SEBEP, this is only your personal opinion, not substantiated by anything.
          1. +1
            April 20 2026 22: 41
            This isn't my opinion. These are the provisions of the Russian Federation Military Doctrine from 2014, which still haven't been implemented and aren't being implemented. I recommend reading it; you'll be very surprised and understand why the SVO is fighting with a backward army that's "yesterday's" [sic].
            Points 15 and 46...
            http://www.scrf.gov.ru/security/military/document129/
            1. -5
              April 21 2026 06: 27
              SEBEP, you apparently aren't aware that the fighting in the SVO is primarily made up of volunteers and those drafted under partial mobilization, and they possess precisely the most outdated military equipment. Some have been retrained, of course, but relatively few. And the professional army plays almost no role in the SVO. It expects a strike from NATO countries.
              1. +1
                April 21 2026 12: 06
                The professional army, however, plays almost no role in the Joint Military Operations (JMO). It expects a strike from NATO countries.

                ))) Was that your joke?
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. + 21
    April 19 2026 15: 06
    If the bridges are still standing, it means someone at the top of the Russian Federation really needs them. A metal railway bridge, for example, is extremely vulnerable to thermite-filled munitions. Several Geranium missiles with a thermite warhead weighing 50-70 kg hitting such a railway bridge would render it completely unusable, even if it appears intact. No bridge builder can say with certainty how a metal span with hundreds of traces of high-temperature exposure and localized metal damage will perform under load. And a small fraction of the drones that unsuccessfully attempted to destroy Ukraine's power grid this winter would be enough to do this. This is an absolutely trivial solution, and any bridge engineer knows about it after completing a military course at their university. If such an obvious solution isn't being implemented, it means those at the very top are interested in continuing the fighting and aren't particularly concerned about personnel losses.
    1. -4
      April 20 2026 21: 57
      Alexey_65, did the simple thought that there is nothing to destroy the bridges ever occur to you?
      By the way, I found a video where a group of enthusiasts like you tried to destroy the railway bridge over the Zatoka River in the Odessa region - see the link.

      https://youtu.be/15g_OfoORKw

      There were 15 attacks on the bridge. There were several such attempts in total.
      Well, it would seem that we just saw the example of Iran, which restored all the bridges destroyed by bombings within 48 hours. Why would it be any different in Ukraine?
      The bridges closer to the LBS, which we regularly remove with FABs, are restored no less regularly.
  4. + 18
    April 19 2026 15: 07
    I wish I had, I wish I had... Everywhere there's a "wish." Five years into the war and the enormous losses of Russian troops, the Kremlin's wise men still haven't explained the ban on destroying enemy bridges. What's the point? What should the people think of it? Why is the government like this? Do they all have granddaughters in Manchester? I doubt it; there's something else going on, and something very bad indeed.
    1. -1
      April 19 2026 22: 18
      As much as I "love" Putin's regime, I'll try to play the devil's advocate. Maybe the dams are in the way? They're concrete, so thermite won't get to them. Even if there are only two of them for every 20 bridges, there's no way to blockade them without destroying them.
      1. +6
        April 19 2026 22: 55
        Why do you think a complete blockade is necessary? Look at the map of Ukraine's railways and roads; in many critical areas on the front, blocking just one or two bridges would be enough to start the Ukrainian Armed Forces facing the same problems described in the article. But we get your point – if you can't destroy everything at once, then you can't do anything at all. :)
        1. -2
          April 20 2026 22: 02
          Alexey_65, we regularly destroy bridges near the LBS with FABs. And Ukraine restores them just as regularly. You might want to check it out.
          But, in fact, the FABs don’t reach the Dnieper bridges.
    2. -2
      April 20 2026 22: 00
      Alexpan, did the simple thought that there is nothing to destroy bridges not occur to you?
      And you probably didn’t notice the example of Iran, which restored all its bridges in 48 hours.
  5. +9
    April 19 2026 15: 11
    But after the liberation of Donbass, the people of the Outskirts won't agree to a deal, and what will the nanostrategist do then? Anchorage is definitely out of the question for him, unless of course he completely screws everything up.
    1. -2
      April 20 2026 22: 03
      rotkiv04, let's move on. But for now, Ukraine says it agrees to peace under the LBS. We're simply not happy with the current LBS.
  6. +8
    April 19 2026 15: 18
    The strategist's plan is quite clear. When we liberate Donbas and reach the Dnieper, the Ukrainian Armed Forces will destroy the bridges themselves. And once again, that will be our victory.
  7. 0
    April 19 2026 15: 41
    Is it possible to liberate Donbas quickly and without unacceptable losses?

    We must proceed by a method of gradual escalation with a warning "if you don't comply":
    1. Testing of high-yield nuclear weapons at the Yavoriv test site in the Lviv region.
    2. Nuclear strike on airfields and infrastructure facilities in western Ukraine.
    3. We destroy Kyiv and the bridges and dams in Ukraine with a nuclear strike. Clearly, the population is being warned.
    What can you do? War is a cruel thing, and people die by the thousands in the LBS alone.
    This is how Donbass can be liberated. And not only that, but even something else.
    And no Trump and Europe with drones are needed to achieve peace?
    This could be a plan. This is real power without red lines.
    Of course, we can push the LBS with various technical and tactical innovations, but we have no prospects for the coming summer, and the losses of our fighters continue in the thousands, and for the Europeans this is a balm for the throat, while their hired drug addicts don’t care about the losses of either Russians or Ukrainians.
    1. 0
      April 19 2026 22: 21
      What do you say about China and India being categorically opposed to your wonderful plan? Okay, India, but without China, we won't last a month.
      1. +2
        April 20 2026 11: 57
        but without China we won't last even a month

        I think we'll make it through, even though it will get worse. However:
        - I don’t think that China will want to lose a reliable neighbor;
        - in military terms, nuclear weapons outweigh all drones;
        - oil and gas supplies to China are of great importance;
        - China's financial interests (investments) in Iran are much higher than in Russia, and what has China done against the US? Nothing significant.
        Well, yes, China is against the use of nuclear weapons in principle. So what? Nothing.
  8. +1
    April 19 2026 15: 52
    If the Iranians join in, then maybe it's possible. With these guys, you can only dig tunnels.
  9. +8
    April 19 2026 16: 18
    If it doesn't exist, then someone needs it.
    Judging by the actions, the main global task being carried out is to reduce the size of the Slavic Russian-speaking population and replace it with migrants.
    and it's going well on all sides....
    1. -4
      April 20 2026 22: 06
      Sergey Latyshev, remember that the Slavic population of Russia is only growing due to the events of the Crimean Spring and the North-Eastern Military District – our number has increased by 8 million. And over time, some Ukrainian refugees will also receive Russian citizenship.
  10. -8
    April 19 2026 16: 56
    They're talking about destroying bridges here. The foundation of any bridge is its piers. If they're not disabled, repairing a bridge from an air strike will only take a few days. And there's nothing to destroy the piers with. They can only be destroyed by demolition crews or by heavy bombs dropped from the air. The air isn't ours. Missiles also can't completely disable bridges. There simply aren't any.
    1. + 10
      April 19 2026 17: 41
      Don't repeat the official nonsense. To disrupt the movement of troops from one area to another and their supply of equipment and ammunition, which would dramatically worsen the situation for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, it's not necessary to completely destroy the bridge supports. To do this, it's enough to either severely damage the bridge superstructure or regularly target the access roads, causing congestion for trains and vehicles approaching the bridge (these congestion themselves are an ideal target for drones). The number of drones that bombed and bombed, but failed to destroy, the Ukrainian energy sector this winter would have been more than sufficient for this task.
      I can imagine how partisans and saboteurs during the Great Patriotic War, who blew up entire bridge spans behind Nazi lines with just tens of kilograms of explosives, would have been surprised to learn that this was simply impossible. By the way, do you know what they teach in the military departments of transport institutes? Among other things, they teach how to disable various bridges with minimal resources, and destroying the supports is not even considered an option for such operations. They all know and understand perfectly well where or how much explosive should be placed on the bridge to achieve the desired effect. And these aren't kilotons or megatons, but much more modest quantities. I'll even tell you a secret: every bridge in the USSR was built precisely to be easily blown up if necessary. The largest ones even have special compartments where explosives are stored during wartime to destroy the bridge spans.

      P.S. And by the way, regarding demolition experts. By your logic, the entire Russian Armed Forces don't have a single special operations unit capable of stealthily infiltrating behind front lines with several dozen kilograms of explosives (and modern explosives are many times more powerful than those used in WWII) and blowing up a strategic bridge span or access roads? Well, then maybe they shouldn't have started at all if things were so bad?
      1. -4
        April 19 2026 22: 23
        Quote: Alexey_65
        By your logic, there isn't a single special operations unit in the entire Russian Armed Forces that is capable of secretly penetrating behind the front lines with several dozen kilograms of explosives.

        There are 20 bridges, so we need to find 20 suicide bomber groups? Well, that's unlikely.
        1. +7
          April 19 2026 22: 50
          This is too primitive a manipulation technique—it won't work even here. To create enormous problems for the Ukrainian Armed Forces in critical areas of the front, it's not necessary to simultaneously destroy all 20 bridges along the Dnieper River for almost 1000 km. Just one or two would be enough to make railways and supply lines the Ukrainian Armed Forces' main problem in that area. By your logic, there was no need to blow up anything during WWII either; you couldn't blow up all the bridges anyway, so why bother wasting your time?
          So there is no real and logical justification for the almost complete absence of attacks on bridges, no matter how hard one tries to come up with plausible reasons.
          1. 0
            April 20 2026 18: 21
            The Ukrainians managed to disable the Antonov Bridge over the Dnieper in Kherson. They even hit the bridge deck with Heimers. Our similar Tornado MLRS won't reach bridges; they don't have the range. A heavy drone like the Gerani is needed. The question is, why haven't they developed one after five years of war?
            1. -3
              April 20 2026 22: 10
              Timka, we couldn't do it. Especially since we built a few pontoon bridges nearby for backup.
              The geranium carries only 50 kg of explosive. This is nothing for the bridge,
              We remember that the Ukrainians are quickly restoring all the bridges we destroyed (which are near the LBS).
      2. 0
        April 20 2026 13: 59
        That's the problem, we don't have any "Kovpaks" or "Kuznetsovs" in this war... And here you mentioned the partisans and demolitionists.
        1. -3
          April 20 2026 22: 11
          VladZ, that's good. Because we're the ones on the offensive, and why would we need partisans in our rear?
    2. WFP
      +5
      April 19 2026 22: 28
      Don't spout nonsense. Not long ago (it's not even 10 years old) the Central Bridge in Dnipropetrovsk was being renovated. If I remember correctly, three sections of the bridge were replaced (not the span, but sections—the longitudinal reinforced concrete beams that make up the span). The entire renovation lasted almost two years. And this was during peacetime. They'll only be able to lay planks for pedestrians in a few days, and even that's doubtful.
      1. +1
        April 20 2026 11: 59
        With the Ukrainian government like this, it could take ten years to patch up the gap. But the West is interested here, and rest assured, they'll fix it quickly.
        1. 0
          April 20 2026 21: 56
          You're clearly completely unfamiliar with bridge construction, yet you spout utterly absurd statements. Any damage to even a small section of a bridge requires a detailed examination and identification of any hidden defects. Replacing even one bridge element requires a complex sequence of operations to preserve the integrity of the rest, which is why bridge repairs take so long. Bridge construction requires complex strength calculations during design, and any damage alters operating conditions so significantly that, until the damage is fully repaired, only temporary repairs are possible, reducing the load on the bridge tenfold during subsequent operation. This would also significantly reduce the flow of military equipment and ammunition across the bridge, while it would remain ostensibly intact.
      2. -3
        April 20 2026 22: 13
        PMA, some of the bridges we destroyed with FABs near the LBS have been rebuilt by the Ukrainians many times already. And read about pontoon bridges – they're built very quickly. In just a few hours.
        1. WFP
          +2
          April 21 2026 10: 47
          Don't confuse the automobile bridge over the Oskol River, which is much less than 100 meters wide, with the bridges over the Dnieper, which is 1,5 kilometers wide near Dnipropetrovsk. With a corresponding current and depth. Are there many pontoon parks in Europe capable of constructing crossings over such rivers? And then restoring them "in a matter of hours?"
          Moreover, the main issue is the destruction of railway bridges, which, unlike automobile crossings, cannot be erected in a matter of hours. And they cannot be restored.
          1. -4
            April 22 2026 00: 38
            PMA, let me remind you that in 2022, Russia built five pontoon bridges across the Dnieper River to Kherson. Do you think Europe's specialists are more incompetent?
            Apparently, you are not aware that there are also pontoons for railways.
            Let me remind you that in Iran, a bunch of bridges, including a railway, were restored in 48 hours.
            Eyes are afraid, and hands do.
            1. WFP
              0
              April 25 2026 18: 08
              Well, why don't they show us how it's done? What's the problem? Or is it okay to fire missiles at locomotives, of which there are thousands running around the country, but is it too much trouble to drop two dozen missiles on a single bridge a couple of times to see how those clumsy NATO specialists can restore it "in 48 hours"?
              Or is it only they who can properly tear up bridges, sink cruisers, and blow up pipelines, but from our side - "it's pointless"?
              Your "evidence" is, to put it mildly, unconvincing. And monotonous.
              1. -1
                6 May 2026 20: 40
                PMA, they've already tried this, demonstrated it. Using the example of the railway bridge in the Odesa region. See the video at the link: "Strike on the Zatoka Bridge, combined missile and drone strikes 15 times."
                https://youtu.be/15g_OfoORKw
                We used 15 missiles and large UAVs. And there were several such unsuccessful attempts. Are you saying you didn't know anything about this? We need to strike at targets that can be realistically, if not destroyed, then at least disabled for a long time.
                1. WFP
                  +1
                  9 May 2026 12: 20
                  Yes, they struck once. They declared "victory" and calmed down, having expended "as many as" 15 drones and missiles. But they should have struck at least once a week. And the ammunition consumption would have been several times lower, compared to attacks by individual trains. Or can we just hit locomotives every day, throwing out hundreds of the same drones?
                  1. -1
                    4 June 2026 20: 50
                    PMA, not once, not twice.

                    Soviet bridges across the Dnieper were designed with the possibility of bombing and artillery shelling in mind. Their strength was calculated to withstand direct hits from hundreds of aerial bombs weighing up to 500 kg, while still maintaining the ability to be quickly repaired.

                    But you need to hit at least once a week.

                    They tried, but the railway line is repaired in no time. That's why they've switched to destroying diesel and electric locomotives—there's nowhere to get new ones.

                    In the first quarter, there were more than 540 attacks on Ukrzaliznytsia's railway infrastructure and rolling stock. As a result, 1718 railway assets were damaged.
                    1. WFP
                      0
                      5 June 2026 09: 23
                      You're very monotonous. Your arguments are unconvincing. I'll repeat again: the attack on the Crimean bridge knocked him out for many months. But for some reason, you're not listening to this argument.
                      1. -2
                        16 June 2026 09: 00
                        PMA, let me remind you that the bridge to Crimea has been attacked before. See the photo from 2023. We're not talking about months, but days.

                        "The structures are not in danger of total collapse, but they require immediate repairs. Khersonavtodor specialists are ready to begin welding and concrete work immediately after receiving permission from the military. Traffic is planned to be reversible. in the next 24 hours, a full recovery will take about a week."
                      2. WFP
                        0
                        16 June 2026 15: 52
                        No need to lie. Your photo doesn't show the Crimean Bridge.
                      3. -1
                        18 June 2026 03: 55
                        PMA, I didn't say it was Krymsky. I took the photo from a post about the bridge in Chongar. See a similar photo at the link:
                        https://icdn.lenta.ru/images/2023/08/06/16/20230806161337408/owl_detail_620_a72b6f568589550da4746cf54012bf95.jpg
                        I found it on Google in two minutes. I wonder what stopped you from doing it yourself before hurling insults?
                        Here is another photo of the damage to the Chongra Bridge in 2023:
                        https://cdn-storage-media.tass.ru/resize/1312x868/tass_media/2023/06/22/m/1687419253522774_mrD-tr_9.jpg
                      4. WFP
                        +1
                        19 June 2026 09: 47
                        Everyone's seen these photos. And also the photo of the Antonovsky Bridge. And everyone's claiming that logistics through the Chongar Strait and the bridge in Genichesk have been disrupted due to such damage—freight transport goes through Perekop, which means hundreds of "extra" kilometers along the roadways. Yet, for some reason, no similar actions are being taken against the enemy. Besides, why don't you want to mention the Kryukov Bridge? How long was rail service interrupted?
    3. -6
      April 20 2026 22: 07
      Nikolai Malyugin, at least one voice of reason. Iran only needed 48 hours to restore all its bombed bridges.
      1. WFP
        0
        19 June 2026 09: 48
        Once again - how many hours did the Crimean Bridge stand after the Ukrainian Armed Forces attack?
  11. +1
    April 19 2026 17: 17
    Yes, but why? (C)
  12. +9
    April 19 2026 21: 30
    We're not attacking bridges, data centers, or banks, we're not destroying civilian airfield infrastructure (we probably don't want to interfere with our European partners' ability to communicate with Ukraine), we're not considering an offensive through the Chernihiv region (by the way, there are few fortifications there, and the forests aren't ideal for drones), we're not eliminating the Ukrainian leadership or senior army officials...
    1. -3
      April 20 2026 22: 16
      SENIOR ORB, let's read together:

      Ukraine is actively constructing large-scale defensive lines in the Chernihiv region, which borders Russia and Belarus, to prevent a repeat invasion. The fortifications include anti-tank ditches, concrete "dragon's teeth," trenches, and minefields. The work, which has intensified, since the end of 2023, are aimed at creating a deeply echeloned defense in the border area.

      Therefore, the rest of your theses are not even worth reading. They are equally untrue.
  13. Why bother if you can suffer greater losses? Bondarchuk will make a movie later, it'll go down well with beer and fish.
  14. -1
    April 20 2026 01: 37
    Nope... no way... what's wrong? So fast? ... just a little bit more...
  15. +2
    April 20 2026 03: 54
    Is it possible to liberate Donbas quickly and without unacceptable losses?

    The liberation of Donbas, like that of Russian Ukraine, is increasingly becoming a legendary wish rather than a factual reality, like a Garden of Eden that no one has seen, but it probably exists. Or like a presidential change—the constitution says something about it, but in reality, it's a single person with a single outcome, like Groundhog Day.
    1. -3
      April 20 2026 22: 17
      Wow, only 4600 square kilometers remain. Considering that 6000 square kilometers were liberated by 2025.
      So soon.
      1. 0
        April 20 2026 23: 12
        Words are quickly spoken, but deeds are not so quickly done. So wait, and maybe you'll get it, although, as with me and this president, it's unlikely.
        1. -4
          April 21 2026 06: 29
          Voo, we've already seen Chechnya return, Georgia forced into peace, Crimea reunified, and the annexation of the LPR and DPR. So I have no doubt that we'll liberate Donbass.
          1. 0
            April 25 2026 02: 32
            I think we'll be waiting a long time until the Kremlin rids itself of this one suspicious figure. What's so suspicious about this guy, you ask? And I'll answer—what's suspicious about him? He doesn't drink! Maybe after a bottle or two, he'd take a look at his entourage and realize he's no genius at complex moves, just a reciter of scraps and memorized texts. Perhaps, realizing his place in this muppet show, he'd make an unconventional move, one that would allow him to see his victory through to its logical conclusion. And now he's being dragged out for various PR stunts because VTsIOM has hinted to his entourage that alles kaput is just around the corner.
  16. +2
    April 20 2026 05: 02
    Of course, it is possible and this would have been done long ago, but not under this government with its thieving archangels at the valves and big cowards!
  17. +3
    April 20 2026 09: 44
    Victory requires not only the determination of the army, but also of the government, which is seeking a deal with the US, and therefore effectively blocks the most painful blows to the enemy—to the power structure, key logistics, etc.
    1. -5
      April 20 2026 22: 19
      kriten, Russia doesn't fight civilians or passenger trains. This is what separates us from the Nazis.
  18. 0
    April 20 2026 10: 06
    Everyone knows that all the bridges across the Dnieper should have been destroyed in the first days of the Soviet Military District, but why they haven't done it yet is a great mystery. And yet, 500-600 drones are used daily to destroy something or other in the enemy's territory, yet the effect on our fighters on the ground is zero! We certainly don't know much, but it seems to me we've been put in check—if we destroy the bridges, they'll destroy the Crimean Bridge and the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant, and maybe even the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant. That's the only way to explain our hesitation on this matter.
    1. +2
      April 20 2026 10: 50
      There's no Shah, just an attempt to stretch the truth on your part. Firstly, there have been virtually no strikes on the bridges across the Dnieper (except for the Antonovsky Bridge) since the very beginning of the Second World War, while there have been attempts to blow up the Crimean Bridge, some of which were successful. In other words, there's no clear timeline. If we had been striking the bridges across the Dnieper and then stopped after the attack on the Crimean Bridge, only then would such a hypothesis seem plausible.
      Regarding the attacks on nuclear power plants, things are even less plausible. The EU is castrating Zelenskyy for any attempt to cause a radiation disaster near Europe, whether it's the Zaporizhzhia NPP or the Kursk NPP. Moreover, while they can try to confuse the media and blame everything on Russia, EU intelligence services will, within 24 hours of the incident, provide a detailed report to the leadership on who actually attacked the NPP and created a radiation hazard near Europe. So, this naive and simple-minded stone flower from Danila the Master simply doesn't work, nor does it explain the amazingly long-lasting preservation of the bridges across the Dnieper, alas.
      1. -3
        April 20 2026 22: 25
        Alexey_65, what about it? I provided a link about the attempt to destroy the railway bridge in the Odessa region.
        And the Crimean Bridge was blown up by a) a truck full of explosives, and b) a BEK, which is much more powerful than any of our missiles.
        1. WFP
          +1
          April 21 2026 11: 05
          Who's stopping them from driving a truck loaded with explosives onto the Old Bridge in Dnipro? Or assembling a similar BEK from a couple of motorboats or yachts to blow up the Kherson Bridge supports in Dnipro? There are even yacht clubs located under the bridge; there's no need to even drive the BEK anywhere; everything is within 500 meters.
          1. -2
            April 22 2026 00: 44
            I definitely won't do this, and don't try to persuade me.
            But, I repeat my opinion, it wouldn't be difficult to build pontoon bridges near the destroyed bridge. So what's the point? Why risk sabotage and reconnaissance groups, expending a ton of effort and expensive missiles?
            1. WFP
              0
              April 25 2026 18: 11
              Who would doubt it? Your task here is completely different.
    2. -4
      April 20 2026 22: 21
      Real_pots, but no one told me how.
      We also remember that a pontoon bridge can be erected in a few hours.
      50 kg of explosives in Gerani are nothing for a bridge.
      The link shows an attempt to damage the bridge in Zatoka with Geraniums.

      https://youtu.be/15g_OfoORKw

      Actually, it’s not zero, the offensive doesn’t stop.
      1. 0
        April 21 2026 06: 13
        Daggers, together with geraniums with thermobaric substances
        1. -5
          April 21 2026 07: 00
          Real_pots, and then in a couple of hours they'll build a pontoon crossing there.
  19. +4
    April 20 2026 11: 32
    Isolation of a combat zone is an axiom of warfare, something even a first-year military academy student knows. Why isn't this known and implemented in the Russian Ministry of Defense and the General Staff? If there's no political will in the fifth year of war, then the political leadership needs to be replaced.
    1. -3
      April 20 2026 22: 26
      Alex Eustace, unfortunately, there's nothing to destroy bridges with. A destroyed bridge can be quickly repaired, and a pontoon bridge can be built in a few hours.
      1. WFP
        +1
        April 21 2026 11: 17
        I would like to see how

        the pontoon bridge is erected in a few hours

        Across the Dnieper, yeah :) No one's stopping you from trying. And then watching how the crests, with the help of their Western partners, build a crossing and restore traffic. But they're not there; only storytellers like you tell everyone about the impossibility of destroying bridges.
        1. -2
          April 22 2026 00: 49
          PMA, yeah, via the Dnieper. We built some like that in Kherson in 2022.
          You're the storyteller. Let's launch a military operation, expend a ton of effort and resources, and destroy the bridge. There are 15 more of them, plus five more hydroelectric dams. We'll spend our entire lives fighting bridges, like Don Quixote fighting windmills.
          By the way, we tried, repeatedly, to demolish a bridge in the Odessa region. Without success.

          A very strange strike on the Zatoka Bridge | Combined missile and drone strikes 15 times:

          https://youtu.be/15g_OfoORKw
          1. WFP
            0
            April 25 2026 18: 16
            Well, yeah, it's much easier to work at substations for a month, then chase trains for a month, then do something else for another month. And we'll put you at the keyboard and tell everyone around us who's the smartest.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. 0
    April 20 2026 12: 02
    Can you name a party whose election campaign slogan would be a constitutional amendment that would restrict officials' foreign property and ban dual citizenship? No one? Your buzzwords are just a vent. The SVO was supposed to spur society toward renewal, and blabbering about trivialities is just a vent.

    The extermination of the people has been effectively legalized, which is why everyone is happy with it. Patriots are dying, the government is wringing its hands, and the conditions are forcing us to negotiate.
    1. -4
      April 20 2026 22: 28
      klev72, remember that the SVO brought us at least 10 times more new citizens than those who died during it.
      1. 0
        April 21 2026 03: 18
        The country's Constitution is 35 years old. It was adopted after the collapse of the USSR, under the guidance of "advisers" from the United States—that's no secret. The country has gotten back on its feet, some problems have been resolved (the national debt has been significantly reduced), the conditions and goals of society have changed, there is a demand for a more equitable way of life, and a new agreement between social strata within Russia is needed to ease tensions. Income inequality is one of the most severe in the world, and this is only in three decades. Many are surviving, while those closer to the state trough are only concerned about their own skins. Two months into the crisis, GDP has been down 1,8%, young people can't afford housing, specialists are fleeing the country, plus the SVO, where people are dying, a schism is brewing amid the blatant venality of the policy of friendliness towards enemies, in the eyes of the people, both cheeks are burning from the slaps, the only response to which is the Foreign Ministry's bleating about peace and red lines. And, in response to your comment, we didn't start the SVO for 10 million new citizens, nor for new territories. We need a strong and independent Russia. The Constitution is the foundation for all the people's aspirations and hopes. It's high time to update it and deny this now-obvious crime. The vertical power structure is stalled, the Labor Code lacks restraint on billionaire deputies, and officials have become an untouchable caste. Therefore, necessary laws haven't been passed for decades, and the country continues to be a raw materials appendage at the West's beck and call while the common people are dying and being replaced. My conclusion is confirmed in my first comment: where is the party working on a new social contract? Over the past 100 years, other countries have changed their Constitutions several times to develop society, but Russia is being told the inviolability of an imposed fundamental law. To continue robbing the country! Only the crests have 2 million dead, and those are our people! In Afghanistan, 15,000 died and the USSR collapsed, and here at least 2 million of our people have died, and we are happy that the 10 million who survived have joined us! Do you understand the essence of your joy?! And what about the plans voiced by the West about war until 2030, after which they, too, will happily attack us? Conditions have changed in the world. Russia must embrace a new, attractive idea of ​​equality. This demand for reconstruction is overdue, and discontent could cloud the mind, sweeping away the rotten structure of injustice. The state will not survive, external enemies are at work. Don't delude yourself with illusions. There will be no stability. We cannot survive without ideology, and even that is prohibited and nullified by the current law. Only embezzlers and opportunists in power enjoy free reign; development and equality are merely proclaimed on TV.
        1. -3
          April 21 2026 06: 55
          klev72, there are so many letters. I don't have the strength to read so much.
          Quote from Levada Center:

          In July 2025, respondents' satisfaction with their lives reached their highest level since 1993. The proportion of respondents who are satisfied with their lives rose to 57%. The proportion of respondents who are dissatisfied with their lives is at an all-time low—11%. Another third of respondents are somewhat satisfied with their lives and somewhat dissatisfied with them.

          In 2025, we had a historic high in the number of travel packages purchased – over 100 million. Of these, 12 million were for international travel. A total of 30 million people traveled abroad. We had a historic high in the number of cars – 50 million. We live so poorly that every street and courtyard is filled with them.
          1. 0
            April 21 2026 12: 21
            We took the trouble to read to the end and see the answer to your statistics for 2025.
  22. +2
    April 20 2026 12: 22
    Quote: Alexey Lan
    Well, yes, China is against the use of nuclear weapons in principle. So what? Nothing.

    It's not just China, the whole world will rise up in arms. We've been telling the US off for using nuclear weapons without justification, and then... They got into hand-to-hand combat themselves, got their comeuppance, and now we're pulling out a knife to stab an unexpectedly tough opponent.... Is this some kind of manly thing to do? That's usually how mountain dwellers behave.
    Although...maybe it will come to that...of two evils...but actually we've already lost in any outcome
    1. 0
      April 20 2026 21: 25
      If the use of nuclear weapons does lead to victory (?), it will be a Pyrrhic victory...
  23. +2
    April 20 2026 12: 39
    A guide to quickly conquering and loving Russia (by Vladimir Putin). If this guide, along with its author, were to be placed somewhere, then we could talk about Donbas. With him in the Kremlin, nothing will work.
    1. -5
      April 20 2026 22: 31
      Dimy4, knock on wood, Russia isn't showing any signs of falling apart yet. Read the instructions on how to increase Russia's area by 135 square kilometers and 9 million citizens (author: V. Putin).
  24. +1
    April 20 2026 16: 42
    It's as easy as pie - just give the order and monitor its execution.
    1. -3
      April 20 2026 22: 32
      Kirill, why am I embarrassed to ask?
      Did you know that a pontoon bridge can be erected in just a few hours?
      1. WFP
        0
        April 21 2026 11: 21
        You're so constant. Don't you know any other mantra besides "in a few hours"?
        1. -1
          April 22 2026 00: 51
          PMA, what's the point of coming up with something if everyone writes the same stupid comments?
      2. +1
        April 21 2026 17: 28
        Where did I mention bridges and their installation time? Regarding bridges...they're destroyed in seconds, plus the pontoons still have to be delivered intact, plus you can't lay rails on them, plus the opposite bank might be swampy or high, plus it's unlikely that even in all of Europe there are a couple of bridge parks capable of building a crossing, say, over the Dnieper.
        1. -3
          April 22 2026 00: 54
          Kirill, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have no problem building pontoon bridges near the LBS, where we regularly demolish bridges. One of the bridges has already been rebuilt five times, as far as I can remember.
          And there are no problems crossing the Dnieper. In 2022, we built five pontoon crossings to Kherson.
  25. +2
    April 20 2026 17: 15
    It's sad to read this, knowing that for some "individuals" in the Russian leadership, bridges across the Dnieper are sacred...
    1. -3
      April 20 2026 22: 33
      Pasha_Kosse, it’s not sacred, since they destroyed bridges near Kherson.
      But the FABs don't reach other bridges. Besides, the pontoon bridge is erected very quickly.
    2. +1
      April 21 2026 17: 30
      Don't look for sabotage - where there is only brainlessness and illiteracy
  26. -4
    April 20 2026 21: 48
    There is a political imperative that only Donbass must be liberated

    Let's remember that there's no such mandate to liberate only Donbas. Because our offensive is also underway in the Zaporizhia region, as well as in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions.

    Moreover, the most difficult battles for the Slavyansk-Kramatorsk agglomeration have not even begun yet!

    How can I say that this agglomeration has already been taken into a semi-ring.

    Finally, to create an automatic hadron anti-aircraft system mounted on a mobile off-road platform.

    Such a complex has already been created, and not just one.

    Our adversary clearly demonstrated this in the fall of 2022 in the Kharkiv region.
    Attempts to return at least Kupyansk do not look very convincing so far.

    The author is exaggerating, because Kupyansk and many other settlements abandoned in the fall of 2022 have already been returned, and what's more, it was possible to advance further in many directions.

    How the Russian army was forced to abandon Kherson and our entire strategic bridgehead on the right bank of the Dnieper when the Ukrainian Armed Forces began systematically terrorizing the bridge crossings.

    The army withdrew to our shore for a different reason – because the Ukrainian Armed Forces began to terrorize the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Station dam.

    If there was political will, something similar could be arranged.

    It’s impossible - we have nothing with which to destroy the dams of the Dnieper hydroelectric power stations and the bridges across the Dnieper.
    But let's imagine that the bridges were destroyed. Iran is a recent example: 48 hours later, all the bridges were operational again. Closer to the LBS, where FABs reach, some bridges were destroyed and then rebuilt multiple times. The same will happen with the bridges across the Dnieper. Remember that Ukraine always has the option of draining the Dnieper by slightly opening the sluice gates of the Dnieper dams.
    Thus, it will not be possible to interrupt the supply of the Ukrainian Armed Forces for a long time.
    The author himself told us above about a terrifying wall of drones, but suddenly it turns out everything is held together by self-propelled guns and multiple rocket launchers. Oh, and we're even talking about armored vehicles. But what about controlling drones from afar, practically from Bukovel?
  27. -1
    April 21 2026 03: 23
    This is brutal! When and where will this happen next?
    Conversation:

    - Do you want me to tell you how to intrigue a person?
    - How?
    - I'll tell you tomorrow.
  28. +1
    April 21 2026 12: 36
    Our grandmaster is playing the long game. He hopes the group opponent will tire, become exhausted, make a blunder, or suddenly faint. He's also thinking about the civilian population, who are gradually fleeing to the right bank of the New Vasyuki River over bridges rather than by boat. They won't be liberated immediately. And even if they are, the standoff will continue. An army of bird hunters will be needed. And this army will need to be much larger than the current one. This will continue until a new automatic weapon is invented to combat alien birds. Unfortunately, this is the new reality.
    Or until a multilateral peace treaty is signed. All global conflicts have ended with a new division of disputed territories and multilateral agreements. The suppliers of enemy birds will also want something in return for their "investments."