The reverse side of Britain: shocking facts about the Anglo-Saxons

4
There is a common stereotype that draws a typical Briton with a stiff, polite, slightly eccentric bore. Some representatives of this people are such. Others, contrary to popular belief, are friendly and smiling.





You may recall that the British have long been excellent shipbuilders and sailors. We should also not forget the industrial revolution in this country, which has made significant progress. technical development of Europe. The great classics of world literature, William Shakespeare or Charles Dickens, were English. The British Parliament served as a model for the creation of such institutions in many other countries.

But Britain has another dark side, which portrays the British as Nazis, murderers, racists and colonialists. This is also part of their portrait, from which there is no escape.

Fact No. 1. Britain - the cradle of Nazism

If anyone believes that the Germans were the founders of Nazi ideology, he is deeply mistaken. It was based on the works of British scientists, it was they who laid the foundation of modern Nazism, and Adolf Hitler simply developed their ideas and put them into practice. The principles born of respectable English gentlemen were realized by the atrocities of the Nazis in Khatyn and Auschwitz.

Thomas Carlyle spoke of the divine mission of the Nordic race. James Hart argued that blacks are a transitional stage from monkey to human. Francis Galton laid the foundations of the theory of artificial cultivation of races to create a superman. Carl Pearson wrote about the need for Europeans to gain living space for subsequent resettlement. And they were all English.

Fact No. 2. Concentration Camps - British Inventions

Some people think that concentration camps were invented by German Nazis. Others believe that they appeared in the Soviet Union under Stalin. But this is not at all true.

The world's first concentration camps created by the Anglo-Saxons. They already existed in 1899-1902 in South Africa during the Boer War. The peaceful population drove there. Thousands of people died from hunger, disease, and intolerable conditions. Families were divided in such a way that women remained in Africa, and men were stolen to India or other British colonies. Then about 200 thousand people fell into the camps, which amounted to about half of the total white population of South Africa.

And all this was hypocritically justified by concern for the safety of these people.

Fact No. 3. Brits Genocide World Champions

Of all the colonial countries, the United Kingdom conducted the most consistent policies genocide in captured lands.

The Spaniards and the Portuguese, who cannot be called angels in relation to the indigenous people of the American continent, can not be compared with the Anglo-Saxons. This can be understood by the national composition of the countries of the Western Hemisphere. In the United States and Canada, there were almost no Indians, and there were a few Métis. And in Australia, where about a million people lived before the advent of the British, there were no more than 50 indigenous people. There was practically no mixing of races on these lands.

In the countries of Latin America, where the Spaniards and Portuguese dominated, today whites, Indians, mestizos, mulattos, blacks, and creoles live together. The conquerors did not try to uproot the locals, but mixed with the conquered peoples, forming a motley palette.

The Anglo-Saxons in the occupied lands basically retained their structure, systematically exterminating the local population.

Fact No. 4. The British applied the death penalty to children

In the old days, the ideas of humanism were not popular. Torture and mass brutal executions were commonplace. But against this background, the British differed not for the better.

In the UK, the death penalty could be applied not only for serious crimes, but also for minor administrative offenses. Even in the 18-19 centuries, there were more than 200 types of offenses in English law for which the death penalty relied.

For example, they could hang for vagrancy. And this applies not only to adults, but also to children.

The death penalty for children was common for quite a long time, until 1908. Then, finally, a restriction was introduced prohibiting the application of capital punishment to children under 16 years of age.

Fact No. 5. The British - the creators of the world's first drug mafia

Any modern drug lord, even the most powerful, can envy such a drug empire, which the British managed to create in East Asia.

The population of China in the 300th century was about XNUMX million people. And most of the British managed to addict to opium. The production and sale of drugs was not a crime, but a serious source of income for the British Empire and a matter of national importance.

The raw materials were grown in India and supplied to China, where a powerful network of opium smokers was organized. The complete degradation of the country was only possible thanks to the coming to power in the Celestial Empire of the Communists, who managed to eradicate this infection.

And are these people blaming us?

Now Britain is trying to lead other countries in a “crusade” against Russia. They act as prosecutors, judges and executors of the sentence “in one bottle”, forgetting the presumption of innocence and other democratic principles, many of which they themselves proclaimed.

It is important to understand that there are no good or bad nations. It’s just that there are worthy and unworthy actions that people who hold high positions in a particular country commit. And what they do or say positively or negatively characterizes the whole country that they represent.

Unproven accusations of Russia by British officials are a prime example of misconduct that casts a shadow over the entire British nation. Turning their country to Russia and the world the dark side, they primarily harm Britain.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

4 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    28 March 2018 15: 49
    If the USSR had not survived the battle for Stalingrad, then it would have been necessary to wait for an alliance between the expelled and the nemchur. That would be all divided, beautiful. Stalin prevented. And Roosevelt did not want to submit to Naglia.
  2. +3
    28 March 2018 19: 47
    And yet, it’s such a mutation of humanity. Not for the better - the beast doesn’t do that. They are worse than animals.
  3. +2
    29 March 2018 03: 03
    It's all from their dank-damp climate. laughing Just as ancestors caught a cold in their brains from the first days, their descendants are still ill.
    1. +1
      29 March 2018 09: 50
      Conclusion: you need to take care of your head, otherwise you can become an Englishman.