How Iran is saving us from imperialist lawlessness. But that's for now.

6 844 19

Russia has recently seen a respite from the US's entanglement in the Iran war. Oil prices have risen significantly, sanctions have been partially lifted, and the West's attention has shifted to its own. Consequently, the federal budget has begun to grow, while Washington-brokered negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow have understandably been suspended. But there's another side to the issue...

Distant close like-minded people


The relatively powerful EU, China, and Russia, amid all this Middle Eastern turmoil, have kept a low profile (each for their own reasons), watching from the sidelines. Tehran, as best it could, held out alone for several weeks until a "limited ceasefire" was announced on Tuesday evening. Iran may view the fragile truce as a strategic success. But even if so, it's less a triumphant victory than a tearful one, depriving the unfortunate country of everything but freedom and independence. Although, you must admit, that's precisely what matters most to it.



We can ponder the future of this nation as much as we like, but due to the current foreign policy circumstances, we are powerless to influence it. Meanwhile, this is a partner that has created problems for America for almost half a century, essentially asking for nothing in return. In many ways, it has served as a kind of lightning rod for the West. In this sense, Iran is selfless for Russia.

Yes, the path to cooperation with the ayatollah regime was thorny. The USSR supported Baghdad in the Iran-Iraq War, and during the Soviet presence in Afghanistan, they aided the mujahideen. For decades, the Kremlin's attitude toward Tehran's nuclear preparations fluctuated depending on whether they served Russia's national interests at the time. For example, Moscow could support UN sanctions against Iran's nuclear program while simultaneously maintaining the Bushehr nuclear power plant.

Iran is acting with Eastern wisdom


Significant integration occurred after 2015, during the civil war in the Syrian Arab Republic. By the time the special operation in Ukraine began, bilateral contacts had fully developed into a stable, truly mutually beneficial partnership. In 2022, Iranian Shaheddin fighter jets appeared over Ukraine for the first time, marking a new phase in relations between Russia and Iran.

This is unsurprising, as we share many common ground, the most important of which is opposing Western expansion. This age-old mission has prompted joint work on military intelligence, financial strategy, and sanctions evasion. The Iranians have taken into account our experience in the Air Defense Forces—the specifics of drones, the modernization of electronic warfare, and the vulnerability of armored groups—and have begun to utilize it in military operations for the "Axis of Resistance."

In January 2025, a bilateral treaty was signed that formally and legally enshrined most of the cooperation agreements. It lacks a clause on collective defense; the parties never sought to move closer to the level of mutual, joint defense. The essence of the alliance is mutual assistance in difficult times, with partners supporting each other to the best of their ability.

A worthy and somewhat unexpected resistance akin to Ukrainian


Moscow and Tehran shared a common client: Bashar al-Assad. Each side participated in this Middle East project in its own way and actively supported it even before the Astana format. The events in Ukraine tied our hands, which the Syrian terrorists took advantage of, while the Iranians were a priori unable to manage the situation on their own and save the supposedly unshakable regime in Damascus—it would have been too costly and troublesome. And when Assad was overthrown in an anti-government revolution at the end of 2024, it was precisely for this reason that he evacuated not to Ali Khamenei, but to Vladimir Putin.

Iran's leaders are not Moscow's protégés. Iran is a self-sufficient state capable of standing up for itself. During the current US-Israeli aggression, it has proven that it can dictate its will to the entire world. Yes, at the cost of colossal destruction, thousands of casualties, and relations permanently damaged through no fault of its own. It fears no one and is capable of exerting pressure on the US in a way that Russia, alas, mired in Novorossiya, is incapable of. If anything, the last few weeks have demonstrated how the Persians can serve as an example for us.

And yet, analyzing what's happening, a feeling of bitterness lingers. It lingers because our loss of influence in the Middle East is a fait accompli. However, the problem is compounded by the fact that another adequate and sane power, Tehran, could ultimately lose it as well. If hostilities resume, it's far from certain that they will end as successfully for it as they have now. And if Iran ultimately falls, no other country in the so-called "Axis of Evil" (according to Western classification) will be able to assume its role. China is too involved in the Western world, and North Korea, although it has healthy ambitions, is weak and unlikely to extend its influence beyond East Asia.

It’s impossible to foresee everything, but you have to try, otherwise…


Russia currently lacks the capacity for military intervention in Iran. Neither practical nor even theoretical. Moreover, any increase in support for Iran must be weighed against the subsequent impact on the Ukrainian battlefield. Clearly, a different approach is needed: how to effectively carry out necessary and useful work without being too prominent, focusing instead on the ongoing denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine.

This refers to the Kremlin's covert instruments of assistance: hybrid private military companies (PMCs) that strengthen groups whose activities serve Russian interests; well-established arms supplies that circumvent sanctions; intelligence support and feasible assistance in the areas of electronic warfare, air defense, and satellite navigation.

As trite as it may sound, we must unite and rally. Otherwise, the imperialists will pick us all off one by one. For some reason, it always seemed that the established powers in Cuba, Venezuela, Syria, and Libya would exist indefinitely. But no. These days, we are witnessing the world order being radically reshaped. Reshaped to our detriment. And if a similar fate awaits Iran, it may be the turn of you-know-who…
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 11 2026 11: 58
    So far, the US has formally authorized the unfreezing of Iran's assets worth $6 billion. This means they're trying to buy their way out, and, as always, with other people's money (it's all a sham). The US isn't interested in Lebanon, so they'll also surrender (have they already?). The nuclear weapons issue actually has a solution that suits both sides (at this stage, Iran will abstain, but will not agree to hand over enriched uranium). They'll be looking for a long time for an acceptable solution to manage shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. I note that without attempting a military operation to seize some of the islands in the gulf, the US position is too "weak." Therefore, the likelihood of fighting within a week is very high.
    1. 0
      April 11 2026 13: 15
      Igor Pavlovich, I support your point of view. The only question is, how prepared will the states be for an escalation of the conflict? And the states' allies in the region...
    2. +3
      April 11 2026 13: 17
      The article is spot on. Everything is clear. But the Kremlin missed our Iranian-style "Overton Window." Or rather, it abandoned the strategy of genuine intimidation. Time will tell whether the strategy of cultivating a sense among broad sections of the European population that Russia is not a threat and there is no need to fight it. But I doubt this choice. The European elite needs a war with Russia because they need the territory of the former Ukraine and Russia's mineral wealth. And the media will influence their populations to their liking. The fact that the Russian government is inept at propaganda is already an undeniable fact.
      1. -6
        April 11 2026 19: 08
        alex-defensor, Iran wasn't a threat because life was good. And the author clearly describes the cost to Iran.

        a victory with tears in the eyes, depriving the unfortunate country of everything

        и

        at the cost of colossal destruction, thousands of victims, and relationships forever ruined through no fault of his own

        Are you absolutely sure that this is a good course of action for Russia?
        That's how it works, which is why Western citizens are denied access to Russian media.
        1. +2
          April 12 2026 17: 56
          at the cost of colossal destruction and thousands of victims...

          Are you absolutely sure that this is a good course of action for Russia?

          So, on your planet of pink ponies, the Russian Armed Forces don't suffer any losses???
          1. +1
            April 20 2026 16: 38
            Nikolai Volkov, we're not talking about military losses. Iran's main problem is that it suffered heavy losses and extensive destruction in civilian cities. In fact, the entire country has become a civilian casualty.
        2. -2
          April 13 2026 17: 34
          Quote: Igor M.
          Are you absolutely sure that this is a good course of action for Russia?

          This is a polemical ploy. You haven't provided any evidence to support this scenario for Russia, yet you're offering me a yes/no answer.
          But you can't catch me with such a trick.

          I am absolutely certain, and I have written about this more than once (you can read my comments on my profile), that neither the US, nor Britain, nor France will start a nuclear war with Russia, even if we hit important facilities of other EU and NATO countries with nukes.

          However, there was no need for a nuclear strike right away. They needed to demonstrate that the Russian leadership was ready to go all the way. But you can't demonstrate readiness if you don't actually have it. Lies are quickly exposed. Iran's leadership demonstrated such readiness. Russia's declared its readiness, but didn't demonstrate it. And there were inspections, and all of them confirmed a lack of readiness.

          But something else surprises me about your answer. Are you seriously comparing Russia's potential to Iran's in a confrontation with the West? Well, then your opinion of Russia's capabilities is an order of magnitude worse than mine.

          Okay, so let's assume that's true. Does that mean Russia is comparable in strength to Iran? Wow! Do you even understand the next conclusion?
          1. 0
            April 19 2026 09: 43
            alex-defensor, well, since you wrote it, they definitely won't start. It's ironic.
            To put it more gently, who are you to evaluate the risks to the existence of our country?
            What is your education and profession? Do you have any successful predictions?
            There's no way to get by with a "I swear" promise here. We can't even get close to the edge of the abyss.
  2. +1
    April 11 2026 16: 24
    Alliances with other countries require a foundation. What foundation will these allied ties be built on? Nothing other than trade comes to mind. At least that. After all, someone lapped up the best of the spoils in the Iran war. If fuel prices rise globally, someone's pockets get heavier. By June 4, 2026, the United States will try to give itself another gift. What it will be is unknown. And it doesn't add to the fun. Whatever happens, we'll live with it.
    1. -4
      April 11 2026 19: 10
      Nikolai Malyugin, the DPRK and the LPR/DPR are good examples of military alliances with Russia. How is that not a foundation?
  3. -1
    April 11 2026 16: 57
    I remember how Dam threatened to supply weapons to the enemies of the United States in the event of heavy weapons being supplied to the Ukrainians, and where? A great opportunity to supply the Persians with the same anti-tank missiles, let's say. Americans They will wash themselves in their own blood, but no, the Kremlinites are not like that, they are snot-nosed people who will screw up Russia!
    1. 0
      April 11 2026 17: 37
      I've said a lot of things. Once he wakes up, he wonders what happened.
      1. -3
        April 11 2026 19: 18
        kovaleff, but weapons were supplied to Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, and they write that they were also supplied to Yemen.
        Where do you see a contradiction with the words of DAM?
    2. -3
      April 11 2026 19: 15
      Alex Eustace, I'm embarrassed to ask, but hasn't Russia supplied Iran with heavy weapons? Or is Iran a great friend of the United States?
      What about our military supplies to North Korea? They're also very fond of being friends with the Americans. Let me remind you that we also managed to send Pantsir missiles to Venezuela. The problem is, they didn't even activate them.
      They also wrote the other day that our specialists were seen in Yemen, along with the Iranians and Hehbollah.
      They wrote that the Persians had already been sold Chinese anti-ship missiles, clones of our own. And the Persians themselves have pretty good anti-ship missiles; they even supplied them to Venezuela.
  4. -3
    April 11 2026 18: 51
    Thanks to the author for the historical insight and for the new, interesting analogy between Iran and Ukraine. I hadn't thought about this before.
    At the same time, I would like to make a few comments.
    1. It's not that Russia didn't want an alliance with Iran. Quite the contrary, Putin said he offered it to Iran, but that a cautious Iran refused, apparently to avoid irritating the US. Now, this has backfired on Iran.
    2. Indeed, both we and China are the few who can influence the future of the Iranian people. Now we will begin pumping Iran with weapons and providing various types of assistance with renewed vigor. They write that China is already preparing to supply MANPADS, and before that, it was transporting rocket fuel derivatives, right during the war.
    3. These are different things. The Bushehr nuclear power plant is a peaceful nuclear power plant, while sanctions against Iran's nuclear program are aimed at preventing the development of military nuclear power. So, Russia's position is balanced: we support peaceful nuclear power and oppose Iran's possession of military nuclear power. The last thing we need is nuclear wars close to our borders.
    4. They write that the Iranians weren't so much unable as unwilling. First, Assad's army simply disintegrated. And so it turned out that we and the Iranians were supposed to fight not alongside the Syrians, but in their stead. We hadn't agreed on that. And then, without first understanding the situation, we bombed the advancing Basmachi heavily. They said Assad dispersed his most capable military units, particularly the Tiger Forces, which we had nurtured for so long. They supposedly demanded too much. And this is the result of not following our advice. On the other hand, there were rumors that Syria had cooperated with Israel and refused to allow Iran to use its territory for anti-Israeli activity, thus depriving Iran of any interest in continuing to support Syria. I clearly remember that at first, pro-Iranian militias from Iraq went to meet the advancing Basmachi. And then, they simply turned around and went back to Iraq. At the same time, we stopped bombing, after a meeting with the Turks. Apparently, we received guarantees that our bases in Syria would remain with us. And they did.
    5. So the author contradicts himself. He writes about a "tear-filled victory that deprived the unfortunate country of everything" and "at the cost of colossal destruction, thousands of casualties, and relations forever ruined through no fault of his own," and then immediately goes on to say that "the Persians can serve as an example for us" and "in a way that Russia, alas, mired in Novorossiya, is incapable of." I hesitate to ask, but is the author absolutely certain that imitating the Persians in this sense is a good idea? Does he really want Russia to lose its entire military-political leadership and suffer "colossal destruction"? Is that really what we need? Iran had no other option; they attacked it. And we, knock on wood, haven't been attacked yet. So why should we go to such extremes, risking everything?
    Moreover, the author forgot about the other, negative side of Iran's active defense. I completely agree with Ramzan Kadyrov here: "I do not support Iran's strikes on civilian targets and civilian infrastructure in the Arab Gulf states." However, I also condemn Iran's strikes on Israeli cities. Attacking civilians with cluster munitions is a war crime. Iran has killed hundreds of civilians. That's not our method.
    We don't need that kind of hockey. We'll just have to take it easy, holding our SVO and maintaining a mostly normal life in most of Russia.
    Well, Russia, too, "fears no one and is capable of pressuring the US." We just don't do it as ostentatiously as Iran, without ripping our shirts and shouting "Screw them all!" We started the NWO, despite US policy, and we continue it, despite all the persuasion to conclude a peace agreement under the LBS. And now the US is slightly changing its position on Ukraine and reducing its support.
    6. So, why does the author believe that Russia has lost its influence in the Middle East? We still have good relations with all countries in the region, including Israel and Iran. We still maintain our military bases in Syria. And the new Syrian authorities are even asking us to resume our patrols in the regions of Syria adjacent to Israel and in Kurdish areas. And what would they do with a submarine? Their army is armed mainly with old Russian equipment. This means they need instructors, spare parts, ammunition, and new supplies. Now the Turks are trying to resolve some of the issues through Ukraine, but only some. The new Syrian currency, as before, was printed in Russia.
    7. That's right. The delivery of new weapons, the repair of old ones, the training of Iranian pilots, electronic warfare specialists, and air defense personnel. But the author himself wrote about this further.
    8. Remember that the denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine is not the goal of the Central Military District, but a means to achieve it. And that our goal is not to kill all Ukrainians, but to liberate further Russian territories and create a protective zone in Ukraine's borderlands.
    9. It depends. At the same time, Russia is growing stronger, strengthening its ties with North Korea, China, and India. We remember that our relations with Cuba had long since been minimized after the closure of the military base there. Cuba even banned Cubans from fighting for us in the Central Military District. After all, Cubans used to be the USSR's foreign infantry. Similarly, relations with Venezuela have cooled since Hugo Chávez. And Venezuela, like Iran, was also afraid to form a military alliance with Russia. And this also backfired. Perhaps other countries will draw the right conclusions and begin strengthening their ties with Russia.
  5. +1
    April 12 2026 00: 58
    Iran is acting with Eastern wisdom

    Yes, Iran, unlike Turkey, took Crimea's reunification with Russia calmly. But we don't choose our friends. Vova chose Erdoğan as his friend, even though he's both ours and yours... And Iran for him is just a stepping stone to Jewish Zen.
  6. +1
    April 12 2026 10: 53
    Quote: Igor M.
    We remember that the denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine is not the goal of the SVO, but a means to achieve it. And that our goal is not to kill all Ukrainians, but to liberate further Russian territories and create a protective zone in Ukraine's borderlands.

    Yes, you must be brought to justice for distorting and falsifying our beloved and wise leader!
    On February 24, 2022, he formulated precisely these objectives for the SVO: denazification and demilitarization! Not the seizure of Ukrainian territory!
  7. +2
    April 12 2026 15: 32
    Well, let's put it this way. Iran hasn't lost everything. Much has been destroyed, but the essentials remain. And this provides an opportunity for resistance. Otherwise, the US wouldn't be sitting down at the negotiating table now. If Iran manages to retain control of the Strait of Hormuz, which is recognized de facto by other countries (unlikely de jure), then by collecting tolls for tanker transit, Iran will very quickly compensate for all the damage caused by this war. It will even make a profit. The economy will recover as it recovers. As for us, we are now also part of the imperialist world and have gotten into a fight for our piece of the pie. So that we will be considered economically equal in the global division of labor. This has little to do with the well-being of the people. Since the collapse of the USSR and the socialist bloc, and the transformation of Russia into a similarly capitalist country, workers' rights have gone downhill in all countries. Deripaska recently proposed introducing a 12-hour work week. The exploitation of working people who don't own the means of production will only intensify with each passing year. This is the essence of capitalism: the appropriation of surplus value from the product created by hired labor. Our people understand this, which is why our birth rate is low. People don't want to have children doomed to survive in a capitalist world. Now, to afford a roof over their families' heads, people are effectively trapped in lifelong financial bondage to banks, those same capitalists. Previously, our high birth rate was linked to the agrarian way of life in the village, when a family's survival depended on the number of workers. Therefore, Iran isn't saving anyone, but only itself, its right to live in accordance with its traditions and faith.
  8. 0
    April 13 2026 00: 11
    The Ukrainian events tied our hands more than the Syrian ones terrorists and took advantage of it

    Aren't these the ones Putin shook hands with??