"Weakness kills. It's time to speak a language the West understands."

12 750 54

Following Estonia's drone strikes on Russian oil and LNG export facilities in the Leningrad Region, Russia has the right to attack Estonian territory. Analyst, blogger, and journalist Yuri Baranchik argued his point of view on Telegram.

He noted that Russia shouldn't have to figure out whether the drones were Ukrainian or not, or engage in lengthy investigations. The kamikaze UAVs came from Estonian airspace, and that's a fact.



If they fly to bomb us from the territory of a NATO country, be it Estonia or Finland, then we have every right to launch retaliatory strikes against the infrastructure of those countries. And I am confident that such attacks from their territory will not happen again. In response to the legitimate questions of the patriotic public, the view has emerged that these are "not our methods." However, it's not as if our current methods are particularly effective. Otherwise, the Second World War would have long ago ended with our decisive and unconditional victory and the shameful and cowardly capitulation of the Kyiv regime, with our tanks stationed in Kyiv, Odesa, and on the Ukrainian-Polish border, and the tricolor flag waving over administrative buildings throughout the 404

- Baranchik expressed his opinion.

He explained that an example of the effectiveness of an immediate military response is right before our eyes. After the US and Israel attacked Iran, Tehran calmly expanded the conflict to the Middle East, after which Spain, France, Italy, and several other countries unanimously refused to provide US President Donald Trump with bases for strikes on Iranian territory. This was done not out of affection for the "ayatollah regime" but out of fear of Iranian strikes.

Baranchyk believes Iran's experience is instructive and teaches one thing: Russia's cautious approach in Ukraine risks the West itself opening a second front, at the most inopportune moment for Moscow. After that, Russia will have to divide its resources between two theaters of military operations, which will inevitably lead to a transition to strategic defense in the Central Military District, which is what Kyiv needs.

Unfortunately, we must admit that drone and missile attacks on key fuel and military infrastructure facilities have become commonplace, routine. And behind this routine lies a terrible thing: impunity. The West has long felt this impunity, so it has begun to escalate the conflict, moving on to strikes against our fuel infrastructure in the Baltic.

- he added.

He emphasized that he had no doubts about the appropriateness of Russia's forceful response to the incursions by NATO countries. Fully supporting point of view Director of the Institute of International political и economic strategies – RUSSTRAT by Elena Panina.

Baranchik is also confident that NATO membership is not an indulgence or a guarantee of impunity. Moscow has every right to respond in kind, but for some reason, the Russian Foreign Ministry and Defense Ministry are remaining silent and taking no active action.

It's clear as day that if we don't overcome this inertial scenario, we'll be forced to go on the defensive. Then victory will be out of the question. That's exactly what the enemy wants. Therefore, our task is to impose our plan on them. Before it's too late. Although we're already in our fifth year... Weakness kills. It's time to speak a language the West understands.

He summed up.
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 7 2026 12: 50
    ...but the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Defense are, for some reason, silent as a fish out of water and are not taking any active steps...

    The answer to the question "why" is obvious: there was no command from the Kremlin, although Zakharova yesterday expressed a new type of concern - a special warning. Let's wait and see what this means.
    1. +8
      April 7 2026 13: 39
      The discussions on VO have already answered what "Zakharova's warning" means! smile
      The fact that Masha Zakharova will refuse to dance her "Kalinka" in front of these figures means nothing more, just like Putin's "warnings" mean absolutely nothing, only Homeric, cheerful laughter from the "respected Western partners of the Kremlin"! request
      NATO authorities have long perceived all these Kremlin windbags as "children's rattles" that rattle within themselves!
      All these "lengthy investigations" are due to the weakness and cowardice of the Kremlin, which "swallowed the spit in the face" in its attempt to adequately respond to the challenges of "test strikes against the Russian Federation from non-Ukrainian territory of NATO countries"!
      1. -7
        April 7 2026 18: 53
        I wish a Russian "shahed" would strike your Ukrainian ass, so you could get down to business (collect your scraps), and not talk about "children's rattles" here.
        1. -1
          April 7 2026 20: 12
          Do you want to beat up all Ukrainian citizens who did not support the coup in this country, or what? smile
        2. 0
          April 8 2026 01: 19
          How did you guess, Alex Pan?! smile
          A cruise missile has already hit my house. wassat
          And that time God saved me (and a strong intuition, Guardian Angels, who have saved me many times since early childhood, having survived my own death and returned to this world), death rustled millimeters from me and already behind my back chopped the tabletop, a small shard broke the lens of my glasses, but my eye remained intact, I washed it myself from small glass chips - I did not seek medical attention, emergency medicine is not available to everyone and the wait for an ambulance in Bandarland is long, alas!
          And this isn't the first time during the Second World War that Russian missiles have blown me up, concussed me, injured my lungs with the blast wave, and wounded me with glass and metal fragments!
          I took them out of myself, pulled a sharp and long, needle-like shard of glass out of the eye socket above my eyelid, and treated all the external shrapnel wounds myself; there were no deep penetrating ones yet, they healed like a dog.
          During other missile strikes nearby, a deadly steel fragment painfully missed my temple, tore through a metal cabinet and embedded itself deep into the wall - I had to pry it out with a screwdriver to get a closer look. smile
          And "geranium" (not "shahed") - you gave yourself away with this Yes ) recently also dived at me, but at the last moment turned into a horizontal flight right in front of me, barely missing the tops of the trees and the roof of the house.
          Probably, in a split second, having emerged from the fog, the operator managed to see that the building had already been blown up, the windows were broken and there was a hole in the roof?!
          But in that growing howl of the "geranium", diving at me from the dawn half-light, I only had time to think, "Well, that's it!" and about my loved ones. Yes
          After all, everything happened unexpectedly and I had nowhere to hide; in the explosion I would have been cut to death by shrapnel and buried under bricks, the remains of walls and roofs.
          In slow motion, I got a good look at it, first the rounded nose and wide wingspan "frontal" and then, in a turn, the entire belly low above my head.
          I was an aircraft modeler myself, I know airplanes and aerodynamics well, so I was very surprised by such practical maneuverability and controllability of this famous "flying wing" in pulling out of a steep dive.
          After all, in a dive just above my head, this "geranium" should have crashed with a howl into the facade of the building. How did it manage to go from a steep dive to horizontal flight so instantly and practically without dropping in flight altitude, just barely missing the tops of the trees and the roof??!
          Although I know that the moment of inertia of a flying wing relative to the transverse axis is much less than that of a traditional aerodynamic design and a canard design, I have never seen anything like this in practice; it was like a huge control line "fighter" maneuvering! good
          I mentally wished and still wish health and a long life to the Russian operator of that "geranium" who didn't kill me! winked
          So, Alex, God is still protecting me, even though I have long since exhausted all the limits of “fantastic luck”!
          And from my own experience I know that I shouldn’t wish misfortune on someone, consciously or subconsciously, because it will definitely come true, but it will also “hit me with a blowback.”
          And so, also from experience, usually with those who have caused or wished me harm, soon, as if by itself, something bad happens, even against my will. request
          My family included Cossack kharacterniks (one of them, a famous Cossack ataman, even had a book published in the USSR and a Wikipedia page about him, just as my other famous relatives have been written about, and not just online) and folk healers. Some of this was passed down to me, and I've had many opportunities to confirm it. smile
          In principle, Alex, by "hooking" on your "letter", so to speak, "mental imprint", it is possible to mentally see you, your present and future, but this requires a lot of effort and energy, you are not worth it. No.
          You don't believe in such "paranormal phenomena," do you? They taught you at school that "there are no otherworldly forces," "death is death," and that "in our space there are only three axes of measurement" and "time flows in one direction"?! smile
          Therefore, you little spiteful Bandera bastard,

          Your words are on your shoulders, Alex Pan, and you will definitely be "picking up some of your scraps", then you will remember me and your nonsensical "rotten bazaar based on stupid emotions"! No doubt about it! Yes
    2. -5
      April 7 2026 15: 31
      otkiv04, the answer is obvious:

      https://youtu.be/RGKv4UJjVgY
      1. -1
        April 7 2026 15: 52
        What, are you awake? You're a restless one, and they won't pin a medal on your sunken chest anyway. laughing
  2. 0
    April 7 2026 12: 52
    La direction politique russe n'a aucun courage, ils attendent juste de refaire des dollars avec du business comme avant et c'est pour cela que la Russie va perdre, c'est bien dommage et désolant!
  3. +5
    April 7 2026 12: 58
    Yes:

    Moscow has every right to a symmetrical response.

    V. Gaft in the film "Garage":

    My dear, you have the right, no matter what.

    ...Since the time: "She drowned" – V. Putin has lost the moral right to command the Armed Forces, and even to lead the country!
    1. -10
      April 7 2026 15: 33
      Mikhail L., thank God, he doesn’t know about this, and calmly commands and leads.
      Please don't tell him, don't open his eyes.
      1. 0
        April 7 2026 19: 25
        What nonsense from you, I'm impressed. Write more!
    2. 0
      April 8 2026 13: 48
      Indeed, having and using (the right) are far from the same concepts.
  4. +5
    April 7 2026 13: 02
    It's time to speak a language that the West understands.

    Maybe it's too early yet??
    Was it in vain that we suffered for 4 years? Why did you decide now that it was time? feel
    1. +5
      April 7 2026 13: 50
      Roman, please make a note that this is sarcasm, otherwise people will honestly give you a lot of downvotes. The topic is truly serious, it's painful! winked
      1. -1
        April 7 2026 14: 03
        I myself no longer understand whether this is sarcasm... or a long-term and carefully calculated policy of the Kremlin grandfathers... laughing
        1. -4
          April 7 2026 14: 06
          And how long ago did you stop understanding, comrade? smile
        2. -9
          April 7 2026 15: 36
          Roman070280, this is a carefully calibrated pro-Ukrainian policy to drag Russia into another war. A war on two fronts is a path to strategic defeat. Isn't that obvious?
          1. +2
            April 7 2026 15: 49
            a carefully calibrated policy of pro-Ukrainians

            The pro-Ukrainians do not deny that they are the ones shelling us through other countries.
            It is obvious that if we do not respond to this and tolerate it, then this second front will continue to operate unilaterally.
            They hit us, but we don’t respond, so they don’t hit us. laughing
            1. +2
              April 7 2026 16: 51
              Quote: Roman070280
              The pro-Ukrainians do not deny that they are the ones shelling us through other countries.

              Another big question is where these drones took off from. Telegram is circulating alleged information that the drones, although Ukrainian, took off from an airfield in Estonia.

              Quote: Roman070280
              They hit us, but we don’t respond, so they don’t hit us.

              If you're beaten and don't fight back, you'll likely be beaten to death. It's simply human psychology, and it likely affects not only individuals but countries as well.
              The Great Patriotic War demonstrated that if you don't respond to attacks, you'll be occupied. The SVO fully confirms this.
          2. +2
            April 7 2026 18: 24
            Like Igor M laughing For such a wretched thing that you scribble here every day, the owner even gives you money? wink Judging by his writing, he barely finished school? Probably a pensioner working part-time? My God, there are people who hire writers like this who make you laugh through your tears... laughing
    2. -6
      April 7 2026 15: 34
      Roman070280, of course it's too early. First, we need to gather evidence. I bet it won't work here.
      1. +3
        April 7 2026 15: 46
        With this to Masha Zakharova... who yesterday threatened the Baltics, forgetting to provide you with evidence... laughing
  5. +4
    April 7 2026 13: 08
    The main thing is to do nothing and not give in to provocations. Be patient. It will probably resolve itself. Just like in May 1941.
    1. -4
      April 7 2026 15: 38
      alovrov, endurance is the only way to survive in a world of idiots.
      But, this way, we could, for example, try to gather evidence. Otherwise, what if Estonia has nothing to do with it? And we've already hit it.
      1. +1
        April 7 2026 16: 53
        Quote: Igor M.
        Endurance is the only way to survive in a world of idiots.

        "Katz offers to surrender."
        Isn't this the way to "survive in a world of idiots."
        1. -4
          April 8 2026 01: 08
          Igool, don't give up, but keep your composure.
      2. -1
        April 9 2026 08: 17
        You are our humanist! Do you feel sorry for Estonians? And don't you feel sorry for our dying compatriots?
        As you write, we have a lot of people; they'll wait until we gather evidence and send it to the UN. And we'll send the drone fragments to Trump—that's our evidence—and he'll throw them in the trash, as has already happened. Remember when the drones hit a secret facility?
        1. 0
          April 10 2026 02: 53
          Sashok, you just don’t understand that Russia is a state governed by the rule of law.
          Let us remember that we are fighting the source of danger – Ukraine.
          And we understand that if other countries are drawn into the war with us, civilian casualties will increase exponentially. Therefore, every step must be carefully considered, and all possible actions must be supported by a solid evidence base.
  6. +1
    April 7 2026 13: 20
    Weakness kills. It's time to speak a language the West understands.

    Let's hold a referendum on whether it's time or not.
    1. -3
      April 7 2026 15: 39
      Sidor Kovpak, don't. We need to send the provocateurs packing and end the SVO.
      1. +1
        April 7 2026 16: 09
        I'm talking about everyone and their dog offering advice these days... It's about the referendum. I think they know what's going on without us. We certainly won't influence the course of events.
        Regarding the provocateurs, who are you referring to? Those who said it, those who wrote this article, or maybe us (the commentators) because we're just beating around the bush?
        1. +3
          April 7 2026 16: 18
          Quote: Sidor Kovpak
          As for provocateurs, who do you mean?

          from the point of view of Ukraine's interests, it is obviously beneficial:

          1) provoke Russia into launching a direct attack on NATO countries
          2) achieve forced mobilization in the Russian Federation, with all the ensuing consequences for the economy and social stability.
          3) present the Russian Federation exclusively in a negative light

          Accordingly, all those who promote these points with their messages are provocateurs.
  7. -2
    April 7 2026 13: 37
    I agree with Baranchik. Many experts have long suggested launching tactical nuclear and nuclear weapons strikes against Western Ukrainian cities. Then the Estonians would have calmed down. Article 5 of NATO does not oblige anyone to stand up for Estonia.
    1. -2
      April 7 2026 15: 39
      Vladimir1155, I suggest we tell fortunes with a daisy - will NATO stand up for Estonia or not?
      Chamomile is a sure remedy.
      1. -1
        April 7 2026 17: 49
        NATO didn't stand up for its overlord, the United States, and even more so, no one will expose themselves to the Strategic Missile Forces for the sake of the Baltic border states, especially those who themselves provoke Russia. But they'll strike Lviv with tactical nuclear weapons first, and then the Estonian provocations will cease.
        1. -3
          April 8 2026 01: 11
          Vladimir1155, one question. Where did you find chamomile in the spring?
  8. 0
    April 7 2026 13: 42
    What, what right? It's your direct responsibility to protect people. Everyone has long understood why they don't respond.
    1. -2
      April 7 2026 15: 41
      Yuri Nenashev, how will a strike on Estonia protect people? Do you think the Ukrainian Armed Forces will immediately stop launching drones at us?
      In fact, it will only get worse, because a second front will open against us - with NATO.
      1. -2
        April 7 2026 19: 07
        Do you really think NATO only sees the "victories" of the crests? You're wrong. It also sees hundreds of thousands of crosses in Ukrainian (for now) cemeteries and ruins on the sites of recently flourishing Ukrainian cities. And NATO will think a million times again whether it's worth condemning its complacent, well-fed Europe to such experiments.
        1. 0
          April 8 2026 03: 42
          Alex Pan, you're suggesting we gamble with the fate of our country and our lives. Let's take a chance, what if they don't respond?
          What if they respond and then we're screwed? They don't play with things like that, they don't count on luck.
  9. -2
    April 7 2026 15: 20
    There are so many weirdos out there starting with the letter "M." And he still considers himself an expert on new political communications technologies. The unforgettable line "Who taught him how to negotiate like that" immediately comes to mind:

    https://youtu.be/c0NU1LEa6nU

    There's still no evidence that the drones are flying over the Baltics, but they're immediately suggesting hitting them with Iskanders. He's definitely onto something.
    What a twisted logic: to avoid going on the strategic defensive, we need to attack NATO countries. Then we'll definitely arrive, like in the joke about the cowboy, the Indians, and the inner voice. We haven't yet, but if we kill the leader (strike NATO), he'll definitely come.
    The author, they say, guarantees that NATO's Article 5 won't work. Feel free to strike. Amazing people.
    This is precisely what Ukraine dreams of, this is precisely what its drone provocation is aimed at: for Russia to strike a NATO country and open a second front. Then we will not only go on the strategic defensive, but will definitely retreat.
    1. Where is the evidence that the drones flew through Estonian airspace? They could easily have taken a detour, flying through the Baltic Sea. After all, drones have long range. They say they approach Ust-Luga from the sea, not from the Estonian border.
    2. So far, the only evidence of Estonia's alleged involvement in the airstrikes is the discovery of two Ukrainian UAVs on Estonian territory. But they are of a different type, not the same as those flying to Ust-Luga. This is clearly a three-move plan to drag Russia into a new war.
    Step A: They are launching illegal UAVs into Estonia, apparently without any warheads.
    Step B: At the same time, kamikaze UAVs are launched across the Baltic Sea towards Ust-Luga.
    Step B, a Belarusian "expert" emerges from somewhere and rips his shirt off, saying that Russia is being insulted, disrespected, and that it absolutely must strike a NATO country.
    A curtain.
    The answer suggests itself:

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WVO5SUEs5LQ?feature=share

    What needs to be done, in my opinion.
    The first thing we need to do is determine whether UAVs are flying from Estonia. In theory, this shouldn't be too difficult. It would be enough to station several patrol groups near the border and record whether they are flying or not.
    We could send a few ships to Ust-Luga to check where exactly the ships are flying from. Maybe they'll even discover Sannikov Land along the way.
    If they're flying from Estonia, then take a photo or video of the drone flying overhead. And then we can make a complaint, not even to Estonia, but to NATO. So they understand we're within our rights.
    But even if they do, don't fire Iskander missiles at Estonia. Instead, shoot down UAVs in the border area, where we can reach air defenses, and let UAV wreckage rain down on Estonia. Or jam them with electronic warfare.
    And Iskander will only be used if it turns out that the launchers are located right in Estonia. Then they'll be targeted.
    And if it turns out Estonia has nothing to do with it, then apologize for the dire warnings and try to find out where exactly the UAVs are being launched from. Maybe from Poland, from the coast. And if from Ukraine, then bomb the launch site to smithereens.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  10. +3
    April 7 2026 15: 21
    The Duma has rejected the law on foreign real estate for the fourth time already. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation is pushing for something. United Russia is in charge.
  11. -2
    April 7 2026 17: 27
    What a fighter tongue -Go to the North-East and be a hero there, and don't chat on the internet.
  12. +5
    April 7 2026 18: 30
    What's your rush? Our president will celebrate Easter, kiss the icons, cross himself three times, and draw another red line. Masha Zakharova will make a noise, Peskov will crow something, and all our enemies will cower in fear, trying to hold back their liquid feces with a spasmodic clench of their buttocks.
  13. +5
    April 7 2026 19: 31
    The weak-willed "Kremlin" weaklings are nervous about answering that their "partners" will misunderstand.
  14. +5
    April 7 2026 21: 21
    First of all, we need to get rid of the collaborationist top brass in the Russian Federation, as Batko says, and "screw" deputies, senators, parliamentarians, judges, and all civil servants to the seventh generation for dual citizenship and property abroad.

    "We will fuck Parliament over and over again."

    Neutralize the internal enemy and only after that can you attack external enemies.
  15. +3
    April 8 2026 10: 31
    But there is fear in the Kremlin too...
  16. +3
    April 8 2026 12: 42
    It's just age, sometimes old age comes without wisdom
  17. +3
    April 8 2026 16: 57
    As long as the country is run by Jewish spies, thieves and spineless people, nothing will happen.
  18. 0
    April 8 2026 19: 20
    The answer is obvious: if military force alone fails to suppress Ukraine—a state ravaged by corruption, desertion, and other internal pathologies—then logic dictates that attacking an adversary roughly 15 times stronger (even without the participation of the United States) defies common sense. You can write whatever you want in the comments, but who will ultimately shed blood? Here, the cost will be not tens of thousands, but millions of human lives.
  19. 0
    April 9 2026 02: 09
    Quote: rotkiv04
    ... Zakharova yesterday expressed a new type of concern - a special warning. Let's wait and see what that means.

    A special warning (SW) is a strengthened form of Western persuasion. The Russian SW is valid for four years.
    Upon expiration of the validity period, it is expected to be replaced with an OSPZH (Special Warning) with a shortened validity period of up to 3 years.
  20. 0
    April 9 2026 02: 32
    It's time to speak a language that the West understands.

    It's time... but the West only understands Persian. And we, in four years, have not learned a single word in this language... recourse .
    P.S.: Zakharova is a smart woman, but she didn’t think to translate her warning into Persian before sending it to the West.
  21. 0
    April 9 2026 04: 25
    They're probably waiting for a tactical nuclear charge to be attached to one of the drones and then they'll say the crests made it themselves.
  22. 0
    April 9 2026 11: 27
    So it seems we don’t have this language, and even if we did, what are we waiting for?