"This is a qualitative leap": Russian specialists are studying the new Ukrainian Armed Forces drones.

42 689 142

Alarming reports are coming from the Russian Air Defense Zone in Ukraine indicating a quantum leap in the number of small enemy kamikaze UAVs on the front line. The Ukrainian Armed Forces have acquired a new generation of drones, which is creating significant problems for Russian military logistics in the immediate rear.

Soldiers report that the enemy attack drone is equipped with a video target acquisition system (possibly with AI), is immune to electronic warfare, and is undetectable by the Bulat v.4 portable drone detector (developed by 3mx). It is also equipped with high-resolution day/night cameras, has high speed, and is inescapable. It is almost inaudible during approach, and can only be clearly heard in the final seconds, when it is already in a dive, as seen in the video below.




This airplane-style kamikaze UAV features an autonomous navigation system based on inertial-optical odometry (visual terrain referencing) and is capable of flying a predetermined route, attacking a target with its communications and antenna completely disabled. High-quality serial production is noted, as is a respectable range when deployed from a relay wing using Starlink communications.

According to Lieutenant General Apti Alaudinov, commander of the Akhmat Special Forces, the drone in question is a joint development between Ukraine and a Western country. The UAV's wreckage and captured samples were examined by specialists from the Center for Integrated Unmanned Solutions (CUIDS) in Zhukovsky. It was determined that the drone reaches speeds of at least 150 km/h, can fly a range of up to 17 km, and can carry a payload of up to 4 kg. The airframe is made of nylon-plastic, duralumin, and carbon fiber, with components primarily of non-Ukrainian origin.

It's worth adding that military correspondent Alexander Kharchenko, in the Telegram channel "Witnesses of Bayraktar," provided some details regarding the drone in question and the situation as a whole.

I can confirm the quantum leap forward of Ukrainian UAVs. Now, vehicles are burning at a distance of over 40 km from the LBS. The number of enemy loitering munitions hunting for [units/attacks] has increased significantly. technique Within a 100-kilometer radius of the LBS. The enemy is combining cheap, mass-produced strike weapons with expensive foreign counterparts. Anything that can fly and hit moving vehicles is immediately scaled up and deployed on the front lines. The installation of anti-drone nets on the Donetsk Ring Road is a sign that things are serious.

He wrote.

According to Kharchenko, a new reality has emerged, but that doesn't mean there aren't effective solutions to the emerging threat. He proposed certain response measures. First, the process of deploying anti-drone nets along roads should be more technologically advanced and faster.

It's heartbreaking to watch engineers stretching nets using wooden poles. Their work is slow, and the labor costs are colossal. Isn't it possible to create a prefabricated metal structure that would simplify this process tenfold?

- he laments.

Secondly, in his opinion, it is necessary to remember that the Russian Armed Forces have armored vehicles, the use of which significantly eases the situation of soldiers at the front.

The recent losses could have been avoided if the crew had been armored. I understand that a cut-down "Kopeyka" or "Bukhanka" is simple and cheap, but one hit and the entire crew is reduced to mincemeat.

He explained.

Thirdly, one cannot rely on the omnipotence of electronic warfare, since the enemy is taking its own countermeasures – this is a constant competition of technologies.

Only physical interception can reduce the number of enemy wings and strike aircraft. Yes, they gain impressive speed during the final leg. But for most of the route, they fly at a reasonable speed. So more radars and more interceptors are the solution.

He summed up.
142 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    April 7 2026 11: 07
    Defensive measures are proposed.
    But this is not a radical solution to the problem...
    1. -11
      April 7 2026 15: 03
      Be patient and wait

      Now Trump will declare victory in Iran and the negotiating process will be revived. And then Trump will definitely force Zelenskyy to agree to peace talks. But that's not certain...
      1. -8
        April 7 2026 15: 54
        Serj Iff, why do we need peace talks? We've already gotten what we want from the US.
        1. -1
          April 7 2026 16: 28
          What did you achieve from the US? Explain.
          1. -16
            April 8 2026 00: 41
            Serj Iff, ending US support for Ukraine and lifting some sanctions on Russia (though the main thing was to prevent new ones from being imposed on us). Now the US is putting pressure on Ukraine, not Russia.
            1. + 13
              April 8 2026 08: 13
              The US is putting pressure on Ukraine, not Russia.

              Russia is being led by the nose, not pressured by Ukraine.
              1. -3
                April 9 2026 04: 49
                Serj Iff, the new US budget proposal doesn't include a single line item for supporting Ukraine. But the previous budget did.
                1. 0
                  Yesterday, 15: 47
                  The former Ukrainian SSR is fighting with American weapons. What difference does it make to the LBS who pays for it and how? You don't work for the Kremlin by any chance, judging by the comments.
        2. 0
          April 8 2026 10: 17
          It's ironic, isn't it?
          1. -1
            April 8 2026 10: 21
            Quote: Alexpan
            It's ironic, isn't it?

            He's confused, the manual is a bit outdated. laughing
    2. -7
      April 7 2026 15: 52
      Mikhail L., unfortunately, there is no radical solution against drones.
      Everyone struggles with them.
      1. +4
        April 7 2026 16: 35
        There is always a radical solution, but making it requires willpower, which you do not have.
        1. -4
          April 8 2026 00: 51
          Serj Iff, but it seems like the US and Israel have willpower. They're strong, in your opinion.
          And they've been bombing Iran daily for over a month now. But they can't stop the Iranian drone launches. Just as they can't shoot them all down. And everyone's helping them—the Gulf states, Pakistan, South Korean air defenses, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces with their interceptor drones. And it's all for the benefit of the poor. So it's not as simple as you think.
      2. -1
        April 8 2026 15: 04
        Mouse and Rat

        "Neighbor, have you heard the good rumor?"
        Running in, the Rat Mouse said: -
        “After all, the cat, they say, fell into the claws of a lion?
        Here's a rest and it's time for us! " -
        "Do not rejoice, my light",
        To her, the Rat says in response:
        “And don't hope in vain!
        If they reach their claws,
        That is true, a lion cannot be alive:
        10 There is no beast stronger than a cat! "

        -----

        How many times have I seen, notice it yourself:
        When a coward is afraid of whom,
        That thinks that on that
        The whole world looks through his eyes.

        A drone is a primitive, unprotected, slow-moving target, comparable to WWII. Soon, everyone will be surprised that it took so long to find an antidote to drones. It's been around for a long time—the AK630, the Duet, or the Palash. We need a solution and mass production in Tula.

        30mm Russian airburst projectile.
        October 22 2018
        18,5 thousand
        ~1 min
        Application scheme.
        30 mm cartridge with multi-element projectile 9-A-1611
        An interesting air-burst, canister-type aircraft projectile—the 9-A-1611 multi-element projectile—is used by attack aircraft and combat helicopters to combat infantry and unarmored vehicles.

        1 — ballistic fairing, 2 — bushing, 3 — GPE, 4 — body, 5 — VU-30 ejector device, 6 — gasket.
        Characteristics of 9-A-1611:

        Cartridge weight - 826 g., Projectile - 386 g., Length - 285 mm

        28 ready-made submunitions weighing 3.5 grams.

        The principle of operation of the ME projectile is as follows:

        After the shot, after 1.2-1.5 seconds, the bottom expelling charge is triggered, which pushes out the striking elements. Since the speed of the projectile is about 900 m / s, you need to add to it the speed obtained from the operation of the expelling charge (50 m / s) and the speed of the aircraft from which the shot was fired, it turns out that the projectile will work at a distance of 1200-1400 meters from the target. A cloud is formed of 28 drop-shaped submunitions, stabilized in flight by rotation. The projectile can be equipped with a remote fuse.

        I remember reading about the development of such ammunition, only they were called fragmentation beam.
        1. -1
          April 8 2026 15: 12
          It becomes scary when adults, seemingly with a straight face, start spouting drug-related nonsense...
        2. +1
          April 8 2026 19: 43
          (Vladimir 1155) Military science loves precise calculations. There are over 1000 km of LBS, not counting the operational depth. One AK630 or similar system covers up to 3 km in diameter (and along the front—not the sea, limited by the detection of low-observable targets, terrain, and other obstacles). For the entire LBS, you need about 300 installations. This is only the first line of defense; depth is also needed. Where will we get so many? This is not a cheap product. Ammunition is also an issue, but it is more solvable. Will it become a guarantee of countering UAVs, or will they themselves become a target and prey. Conclusion: there have been attempts to mount such a system on tracked chassis, but we see no continuation, meaning there are insufficient results. Self-guided anti-drone UAVs are a better solution. They do not require expensive base equipment and are reusable (parachute-launched or self-returning, etc.).
          1. 0
            April 8 2026 20: 15
            Thank you for the detailed answer from the specialist
            1 The cost of a primitive AK 630 automatic cannon should be significantly lower than the cost of a Pantsir-S, which costs a billion per installation.
            2 AK630 is a close-range air defense system, meaning it's not meant to defend the front, but rather directly attacking units or objects, and should be mounted on tracks, MTLBs, or T62 tank chassis.
            Of course, the use of anti-drones, electronic warfare, and other weapons is also necessary, but simple automatic artillery is the last chance when anti-drones have failed, electronic warfare has failed, the planes have flown away, and there are not enough armored personnel carriers for everyone.
            1. +1
              April 9 2026 03: 27
              We continue to use heavy...

              Quote: vladimir1155
              1 The cost of a primitive AK 630 automatic cannon should be significantly lower than the cost of a Pantsir-S, which costs a billion per installation.

              Seriously?))) You only take into account the cost of the barrels)) With a pedal-gate drive, probably, and an eye-and-hand sight?

              Quote: vladimir1155
              2 AK630 is a close-range air defense system, meaning it's not meant to defend the front, but rather directly attacking units or objects, and should be mounted on tracks, MTLBs, or T62 tank chassis.

              This is a short-range air defense system, and suddenly it's designed for installation on ships. It's a naval air defense system, and it has the corresponding dimensions. The top is smaller than the bottom. So you can't fit it on a tank or MT-LB. And then you have to fit the ammo pack, the radar, and all the electronics—again, unexpectedly, right? And then you have to fit generators, pumps, and a water tank, or you have to stand on a hydrant. Because, again, unexpectedly, the barrels are water-cooled. And on ships, if my memory serves me right, it's running seawater, although I could be wrong.

              Quote: vladimir1155
              Of course, the use of anti-drones, electronic warfare, and other weapons is also necessary, but simple automatic artillery is the last chance when anti-drones have failed, electronic warfare has failed, the planes have flown away, and there are not enough armored personnel carriers for everyone.

              You might also think, although it might not be just everyone, that this projectile-to-missile converter was designed back when missiles were big)) and this AU won't even hit a drone, it probably won't even see one, unless you attach Pantsir electronics to it. But then the question is, why?
              And to add, when did such broad-minded thinkers ever worry about their ideas killing more people than what they were trying to defend themselves against? Doesn't anything bother you? Doesn't it bother you, for example, that the Americans' land-based Vulcans (and their naval ones, too) are only equipped with self-destruct shells? Because if they miss—and that's 99,9% with the AK-630—all those hundreds and thousands of 30mm HE shells will rain down on neighboring villages, civilians, and neighboring units? Of course not. So what if it's just incidental? That's why I say—such thinkers and ideas are terrifying.
              1. -3
                April 9 2026 08: 05
                You're talking nonsense! The AK630 weighs 3 tons, it's heavy, and a small computer is controlled by a single gunner. Shrapnel can't fall on anyone. Who wouldn't get under it? It can hit people from several kilometers away. Where would civilians come from? Don't be hypocritical and twist the facts to suit your narrative.
                1. 0
                  April 10 2026 15: 25
                  Quote: vladimir1155
                  ..no need to be hypocritical and twist the facts to suit your concept

                  LOL)))
              2. -1
                April 9 2026 22: 17
                You have shown your complete misconception in the topic being described,
                1. Speaking about naval artillery, you clearly confused the AK-130 (about 100 tons (of which about 40 tons is the weight of ammunition)) and the AK-630 (3800 kg is the weight of the AK-630 naval automatic artillery mount), which we are discussing and which is installed on boats and tanks.
                2. You lack any conceptual common sense or understanding, for you propose using a radar on a short-range artillery mount with a range of 3 km and a reliable kill range of 1 km... Radar is obviously useless there; it doesn't detect UAVs, gives them away, and is expensive and bulky. Obviously, what's needed is an eye, that is, a higher-resolution video camera, but similar to the simple cameras installed along the fences of private homes and warehouses, with image recognition and motion detection, and a microphone so that targets are transmitted to the operator and the small-caliber gun is automatically aimed. A small camera and microphone can be mounted on a 10-12 meter mast made of plastic pipe.
                1. 0
                  April 10 2026 15: 10
                  Quote: vladimir1155
                  You have shown your complete misconception in the topic being described,

                  Seriously?))) This phrase describes you 200%)) what you wrote next completely confirms this.

                  Quote: vladimir1155
                  1. Speaking about naval artillery, you clearly confused the AK-130 (about 100 tons (of which about 40 tons is the mass of ammunition))

                  Where did I say this, please quote))

                  Quote: vladimir1155
                  and the AK-630 (3800 kg is the weight of the AK-630 naval automatic artillery mount) which we are discussing and which is installed on boats and a tank

                  Proofs please)) although where are they from, these are your fantasies under something.

                  Quote: vladimir1155
                  2. You are conceptually lacking common sense and understanding, because you are proposing to use a radar on a short-range artillery mount, with a range of 3 km and a confident hit of 1 km...

                  Huh? Really?))) I won't even talk about the nonsense that follows.
                  Total: None of what I mentioned above, namely:
                  Dimensions (of bunkers under installation)
                  Liquid cooling system with water reserves
                  The OFS that you propose to sprinkle all around lack self-destruction.
                  - it didn't stick in your mind)) because of what? for what reason?
                  And I don't have common sense)))
        3. +1
          April 9 2026 11: 07
          The Rat says to her in response

          Answer to Vladimir's fable 1155:

          -Moaning rats are not always drowning...
          There were so many rats on the ship of fate that when they escaped, it began to float!
          - We need to neutralize the rat, rather than waste energy on closing the holes...
          1. -1
            April 9 2026 12: 46
            I agree! We need to crush all the liberal rats and everything will be fine.
          2. +1
            April 9 2026 13: 54
            Dormidontov_D.) Quote:

            There were so many rats on the ship of fate that when they escaped, it began to float!

            Very accurate and relevant for today's Russia. All that's left is to find a way to flush out the "rats." (There used to be services, but today they've been eliminated and serve more rats.)
    3. -1
      April 8 2026 15: 36
      Quote: Mikhail L.
      Defensive measures are proposed.

      The head needs to be chopped off, not all this.
  2. +1
    April 7 2026 11: 21
    necessary
    1 use of AK 630 and not RAB,
    2 armor
    3 mass disarming strikes by Tiao and Xiao on cities where these UAVs are made
    1. -6
      April 7 2026 15: 56
      Vladimir1155, if it's an average drone with 5 kg of explosives, then armor won't help.
      Look how Iran has been under attack for over a month now, and it still continues to make and launch drones.
      1. +2
        April 7 2026 16: 36
        Armor will protect you from everything if you use it and protect it correctly.
        1. -7
          April 8 2026 00: 55
          Serj Iff, well, we see Hezbollah burning Israeli Merkava tanks and armored personnel carriers en masse using FPV drones. They've already torched about 50 of them. We see Abrams tanks, Churchill tanks, and Leopards burning in the SVO. Well, maybe someone can do it, but in practice, it's not visible.
    2. -1
      April 7 2026 16: 24
      (Vladimir1155). Problems with UAVs are growing; different countermeasures are needed. A possible option is to launch a decoy. For example, a T-72 tank should be made unmanned, controlled via radio signals (preferably with AI). Remove all ammunition, heavily armor the engine compartment, place a large barbecue on top, and launch it to fly close to the LBS. They'll swarm it like locusts, hit it with combustible explosives, but stopping it will be difficult, destroying a significant number of UAVs. If damaged (tracks, engine), evacuate it for repairs and repeat operations... Regarding advanced UAVs, they are supplied by NATO countries: the Baltics and others. We need to identify the manufacturers and send sabotage and reconnaissance groups to those facilities. For example, a plant and stockpiles of drones for Ukraine recently burned down in the Czech Republic. This demonstrates that hybrid warfare in NATO countries can be widespread and painful. There are no attacks on states; unknown individuals are acting on their own initiative... Conclusion: the more sensitive the response from the centers, the faster the problems will be resolved... Regarding our intelligence and sabotage groups, detain various intelligence agents and other individuals from NATO countries in advance, as a future exchange fund...
      1. 0
        April 7 2026 16: 37
        Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
        For example, make the T-72 tank unmanned, controlled by radio signals (preferably with AI). Remove all ammunition, heavily armor the engine compartment, add a large grill on top, and send it cruising close to the LBS. They'll swarm it like locusts, hit it with high explosives, but stopping it won't be easy; they'll destroy a significant number of UAVs.

        yes, more false targets, good and different.
        More passive protection, like anti-drone corridors.
        1. -1
          April 8 2026 00: 11
          more decoys, good and different

          This is the most sensible suggestion of those voiced here. However, delivering and placing the decoys would again require drone fire. A lawnmower, for example, wouldn't go very far under its own power, and a protected vehicle is expensive.
      2. 0
        April 7 2026 17: 52
        You express sound ideas and we need to use different tools and approaches.
      3. -1
        April 8 2026 20: 29
        support!

        Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
        For example, make the T-72 tank unmanned, controlled by radio signals (preferably with AI). Remove all ammunition, heavily armor the engine compartment, add a large grill on top, and send it cruising close to the LBS. They'll swarm it like locusts, hit it with high explosives, but stopping it won't be easy; they'll destroy a significant number of UAVs.
    3. -2
      April 8 2026 14: 34
      Quote: vladimir1155
      Massive disarming strikes by Tiao and Xiao drones on cities where these UAVs are manufactured

      So, carry out a nuclear carpet bombing of all of Ukraine? Are you out of your mind? Or just intoxicated?
      1. 0
        April 8 2026 14: 46
        Yeah! The Ukrainian fascist is scared and trembling...not a blanket attack, but one city a week, starting from west to east, warning the civilian population to either kill the SBU police and the fascist bosses, or to flee the city to save their lives within 24 hours.
        1. -2
          April 8 2026 14: 53
          You have confirmed the diagnosis after all.
  3. +2
    April 7 2026 11: 50
    But these losers can't do tank biathlon.
    1. 0
      April 7 2026 17: 15
      Our Ak-47 is the best in the world! :)
  4. +2
    April 7 2026 12: 03
    There's one question: when will we have something similar? If Chemezov were to be tasked with it, it would be in about three years. If we were to task those who can do it and give them some extra money, without giving it all to Chemezov, it would definitely be sooner. Innovations aren't meant for corporations; the main thing there is money.
    1. -1
      April 7 2026 15: 53
      I think machine vision and AI are already being used here, but not widely yet; it's a work in progress. These aren't exactly fantastic results, or even crazy amounts of money. But we need to work faster on the home front.
      1. +1
        April 7 2026 15: 57
        A year ago, they were complaining about our AI drones. Lancet, if I'm not mistaken, also has this modification.
      2. 0
        April 7 2026 17: 20
        "Our" machine vision runs on NVIDIA Jetson Orin.
        1. 0
          April 7 2026 20: 12
          In machine vision, hardware isn't as important as software. You can build a system using a cheap Chinese camera and any fast processor. If they're using NVIDIA these days, it's because it's simply convenient.
    2. -6
      April 7 2026 16: 01
      kriten, we have similar UAVs called Lightning.
      They even produce them with fiber optics.
  5. +2
    April 7 2026 12: 54
    Even the USSR had developed EMP weapons (single-use electromagnetic pulse generators in the form of bombs and missiles). In developed Russia, are there no scientists left capable of resuming these developments, or an industry capable of quickly supplying the front with the necessary quantities? Although, what am I asking? Our effective generals couldn't even organize the production of their own radios. Out of habit, they stole everything! All that's left is to build innovative fences.
    1. +1
      April 7 2026 13: 01
      "You are wrong": all that remains is to... implement a 12-hour workday and a six-day workweek – and then the Golden Key is in our pocket." ;-(
      1. +2
        April 7 2026 17: 22
        Won't the oligarchs' faces burst from fat?
    2. -6
      April 7 2026 16: 10
      Dimas, we remember that most of the scientists were lost in Russia in the 90s.
      Plus, the USSR collapsed, leaving too much outside of Russia.
      Since then, some things have been restored, and in others, advancements have been made. But it's still clear that today's Russian science is much smaller than it was in the USSR. Russia isn't as large as the USSR, in terms of people and resources.
      1. 0
        April 7 2026 16: 30
        Why are you puffing out your cheeks then? Just sit quietly. Maybe it will pass.
        1. -4
          April 8 2026 00: 45
          Serj Iff, what else can we do? Just watch in silence as citizens of the LPR and DPR and Russia are slaughtered?
          But Russia isn't rushing to solve the problems the USSR struggled with. We don't engage in direct confrontation with the United States, nor do we support a slew of countries around the world for their choice of socialism. We don't donate mountains of weapons. The scale of the tasks we tackle is much more modest.
          1. -1
            April 8 2026 12: 45
            Quote: Igor M.
            Serj Iff, what else can we do? Just watch in silence as citizens of the LPR and DPR and Russia are slaughtered?
            But Russia isn't rushing to solve the problems the USSR struggled with. We don't engage in direct confrontation with the United States, nor do we support a slew of countries around the world for their choice of socialism. We don't donate mountains of weapons. The scale of the tasks we tackle is much more modest.

            Seriously? How much weapons and money are left in Syria?
            How many nuclear power plants are we building with our own money?
            How much money was allocated for school meals in Armenia? How many schools were built in Tajikistan and other Central Asian republics? How many Rosneft assets were destroyed in Venezuela?
            1. 0
              April 8 2026 14: 39
              Are you proposing an isolationist Iron Curtain? That's the fate of all superpowers. Russia's no exception, no matter what anyone says. Some will lose, some will gain.
            2. 0
              April 9 2026 06: 55
              Mish, if you're not aware, Assad paid us for our guns in hard currency. Well, maybe later we gave away some of the old junk as rent for our Syrian bases. But the truth is, we have one Syria, and the USSR has dozens of countries. What we gave to Syria is a fraction of what the USSR gave to Afghanistan alone. That's where everything went to waste. And in Syria, our weapons, received by Assad, have become a strong anchor for the current Syrian authorities. They need spare parts, ammunition, instructors, and maintenance.
              You mean we build nuclear power plants on credit. And then they pay back the money by selling electricity. And on top of that, they buy nuclear fuel from us and hire our specialists for maintenance. A profitable business.
              The schools justify themselves - then migrant workers come to us with knowledge of our language and our culture.
              This isn't a gift, but an investment in business. Business is always a risk. Before this, American investments were lost. And the Chinese had investments there many times larger than ours. So maybe we'll all get together and go get them back.
  6. 0
    April 7 2026 13: 00
    Sooner or later the question will arise: should Ukraine be attacked or should it surrender?
    1. 0
      April 7 2026 13: 13
      It's time, it's time. And not just on the outskirts.
    2. -6
      April 7 2026 15: 11
      That's it, well, we grey-pawed ones can't handle it... The enemy here is too nimble.
      1. -5
        April 7 2026 16: 11
        Omer Skakavac, why aren't we pulling our weight? We're advancing, and the enemy is retreating. In the first quarter of 2026, we liberated over 1000 square kilometers.
        1. +3
          April 7 2026 16: 36
          The question is: what is the exchange: how many people are given for one square kilometer, and estimate how much more for the remaining square kilometers.
        2. -2
          April 7 2026 16: 38
          The enemy is retreating, 10% of the territory remains to be liberated. Let's wait.
          1. 0
            April 8 2026 14: 41
            Quote from: Serj Iff
            Waiting for

            There will never be a shortage of those who wait. But those who do and sell are always in short supply. Keep waiting.
    3. -5
      April 7 2026 23: 57
      Attack Ukraine or surrender

      No one will surrender. Meaning, give up Crimea and so on.
      But what if the question is put this way: should we take on Ukrainian radioactive waste or should we agree to a deal? This outcome is more likely if nuclear weapons are used. It's your choice.
      1. -1
        April 7 2026 23: 58
        Let's return to this conversation in 1-2 years
    4. -3
      April 8 2026 11: 28
      Sooner or later the question will arise: to strike at Ukraine or to surrender.

      This issue has been on the agenda for a long time, but it has been studiously ignored.
      1. 0
        April 9 2026 11: 39
        They don't notice a lot of things: the bombing of border areas, the daily loss of life, the bombing of Ust-Luga
    5. -4
      April 8 2026 11: 36
      Quote: Mikhail Nasharashev
      The question is: should Ukraine be attacked or should it surrender?

      Strikes of tactical nuclear weapons on Ukraine in no way will not affect the West's ability to launch missiles from Ukrainian territory at Russia.
      1. +2
        April 8 2026 19: 35
        Strikes with tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine will not in any way affect the West's ability to launch missiles from Ukrainian territory against Russia.

        TNW strikes will impact the West's ability to deliver Western missiles to Ukraine. Deciding on TNW strikes is difficult, not least because in 2022, Kyiv was a week away, and now it appears that without TNW, our strategic defense is weak. The time will come when life will present a choice: wounded pride or victory, pride or the search for peace, preferably on acceptable terms. One might even threaten to use nuclear weapons.
      2. -1
        April 8 2026 20: 35
        They will! Because if the population of the former USSR, left partially homeless and jobless, starts hunting down fascist policemen and conscious Banderists to save their own homes and wiping them out in toilets, on the streets, in cars with pitchforks, shovels, axes, saws, and iron threshing machines, then the possibility of launching NATO missiles there will disappear. But if we cower and drag out the process, we'll end up with nuclear weapons in the hands of the Banderists and strikes against the "cowardly Russian Leopolds" from Estonia and Latvia.
        1. -1
          April 9 2026 09: 24
          Quote: vladimir1155
          If the population of the former USSR, left partially homeless and without work, begins to hunt down fascist policemen in order to save their homes

          It was because of such completely unrealistic assessments of the situation that we got ourselves into this SVO.
          Of course, Russia was, is and will be to blame for all the troubles of the Ukrainians (from their point of view), and not the "policemen" at all.
          The biggest thing is that EU countries will feel some discomfort from having to accept a wave of refugees.

          The tactical nuclear strikes will impact the West's ability to deliver Western missiles to Ukrainian territory.

          This would only happen if a continuous destruction zone were created on the western border. That wouldn't be tactical nuclear weapons; it would require the use of strategic warheads in significant quantities. And even then, within a couple of weeks, delivery routes would begin to be laid through that strip.

          All of this has been discussed 100500 times already, but they didn't even go for it in the fall of 2022, during the period of "difficult decisions" (and rightly so), and they certainly won't do it now. Even Trump hasn't hit Iran yet.

          Quote: vladimir1155
          cowardly Russian Leopolds

          Yes, yes, a typical teenage attempt at divorce through "Are you weak?"
          1. 0
            April 9 2026 20: 52
            Even Trump hasn't hit Iran yet.

            The key word is "hasn't hit yet" - but there are several reasons for this: this is more of an Israeli war than a US one; the US, unlike us, doesn't have a common border with Iran and the US could leave tomorrow; Iran doesn't threaten US national interests; there aren't millions of US immigrants in Iran.
            Trump doesn't want a major war with the loss of US soldiers; midterm elections are in the fall. If they bombed Western Ukraine with conventional weapons the way the US bombed Iran, no one would even be talking about tactical nuclear weapons, or responded like Iran, the strategic war would already be over.
      3. 0
        April 9 2026 11: 38
        I doubt it very much
  7. 0
    April 7 2026 13: 58
    With this approach, we'll soon be in full... trouble. A strike on the MI6 building in London would immediately cool the heaviest of opponents, but it seems like someone is working hard on the enemy. They're playing along, little by little, carefully increasing their workload, letting them adapt. Meanwhile, they're driving their own guys like soldiers in World War I were driven by machine guns, with the difference being that now they're driven by drones. One house a day is enough for the territory occupied by the Judeo-Banderites for five hundred years. Take a cue from Iran and strike your enemies right where they're hiding.
    1. +1
      April 7 2026 14: 21
      This is all unrealistic, no one will do this.
      1. -4
        April 7 2026 16: 15
        Mikhail Nasharashev, that's right. I've just started living, you could say, retired. And now they're proposing a nuclear exchange. Mind you.
        1. +1
          April 7 2026 16: 43
          life is a moment between the past and the future
          in the life you will have a blast
          Even if you live as a janitor, you will be born a foreman again, and then from a foreman you will grow to become a minister.
        2. 0
          April 7 2026 16: 47
          Just retired. It's understandable why you're a commentator. Your pension is small, so you have to earn extra money. That's why you're writing all this nonsense. But it'll all be over soon, and you'll be living on your pension alone.
          1. -1
            April 7 2026 18: 13
            Quote: Serj Iff
            Just retired. It's understandable why you're a commentator. Your pension is small, so you have to earn extra money. That's why you're writing all this nonsense. But it'll all be over soon, and you'll be living on your pension alone.

            Nooooo, he'll be bringing slippers to the bedroom of a Bandera supporter if they trust him, and getting beat up if he doesn't, if this continues. Some will go to Gaga, some to Solovki, and some will move into dugouts. They won't be messing around with the defeated. We'll all be digging some tunnel under the strait, and whoever survives will smell the stench of Anchorage.
            1. +1
              April 7 2026 18: 29
              They believe things will be as they were before. Friendship, chewing gum, jeans, and Coca-Cola. A generation of hangers-on. Especially Igor M (probably a mu...k).
          2. -3
            April 8 2026 01: 00
            Serj Iff, it's actually quite big. I worked hard and well, and I received a good pension. It's even more than my current salary at the institute.
            1. -2
              April 8 2026 20: 40
              Well, did the pension fund credit you with 200 thousand rubles per month?
    2. -2
      April 7 2026 16: 14
      GR777, the nuclear winter that could follow a strike on London would immediately chill the entire world. We don't need that.
      And what's going on with Iran itself? I really don't want to be in their shoes. We'll do it the old-fashioned way, on the sly.
      1. -5
        April 7 2026 16: 39
        If we don’t hit London, Russia will be next in line after Iran.
        1. -2
          April 8 2026 00: 57
          Serj Iff, if we do hit, we'll beat Iran to Valhalla. Better to wait a bit longer, then, and wait in line for a bit.
      2. -2
        April 7 2026 18: 23
        How tired I am of you, you nerds. They bomb us, not expecting a nuclear response, but if we hit them with Oreshnik with depleted uranium pellets, they'll immediately blanket us with nuclear carpet bombing. Did you know the English don't have their own red button? They rent Tridents from the US. Their red button is in Washington, because glass donkeys don't last long.
        1. -4
          April 8 2026 00: 58
          GR777, they have nuclear submarines with ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads. Well, anyway, they're part of NATO. And the US and France are there too.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. -1
          April 8 2026 01: 56
          Quote: GR777
          If we hit Oreshnik with depleted uranium pellets, they will immediately cover us with atomic carpet bombing.

          Why bother? They'll just retaliate by pounding St. Petersburg or Kaliningrad with conventional weapons. Or do you think the Brits and Americans will just sit back and watch us pound London? Americans They might not attack directly, but they'll overwhelm the Brits with weapons, no matter how hard you try.
          Forget about nuclear weapons, there won't be any.
      3. -1
        April 7 2026 18: 40
        Excellent! Let's fight global warming with a "nuclear winter"!
        Oh, what if I just figured out the Western elite's plan? 🫢
      4. 0
        April 7 2026 19: 13
        which could follow the attack on London

        Who will hit their own children?
  8. 0
    April 7 2026 14: 21
    but they somehow heard or felt it
    He must have just been going at a high speed if they didn't see him and react.
  9. -2
    April 7 2026 14: 22
    Have military factories in Russia built a multiple of that in 4 years? Akkela missed the mark.
    1. -4
      April 7 2026 16: 17
      AndrK72, UAV production was increased 30 times.
      1. +1
        April 7 2026 19: 14
        Drones can even be assembled in sheds
      2. +2
        April 8 2026 00: 10
        You haven't heard of the zero base effect, have you? Incidentally, for the first time since the start of the Second World War in March 2026, the Outskirts surpassed Russia in the use of long-range weapons (with a range greater than 100 km) – 7347 Western UAVs were launched at Russia, compared to 6462 Russian UAVs and missiles at the Outskirts.
        1. -3
          April 8 2026 03: 48
          RakitinAxS, not zero. Many of our UAVs were developed just after 2014, and we used them in Syria. But at the beginning of the SVO, we only used munitions. Several Lancets were launched for testing in the summer of 2022.
          So, who counted? They say the Ukrainians aren't including a significant number of our drone strikes in their statistics.
    2. -2
      April 8 2026 01: 59
      AndrK72 Only the plant in Tatarstan (Gerani).
      1. -2
        April 8 2026 04: 08
        That's what Google writes,

        As of early 2026, there are approximately 800–900 organizations in Russia involved in the production of unmanned aerial systems and their components, including small, medium, and large businesses.

        A major manufacturer is the Kalashnikov concern, its subsidiary ZALA Aero Group / Unmanned systems.
        Aero-Hit, the largest company in the Far East, produces 10 devices every month for special operations zones.
        Designers at the Skopa Research Center for Unmanned Systems (RCUS) in Stavropol have been assembling FPV drones since 2018. In recent years, they have been primarily used by UAV operators in special operations zones. Skopa is a completely domestic development, containing no components or parts imported from foreign manufacturers.
        Five companies in Moscow produce Baba Yaga.
        The manufacturer of the Orlan series of UAVs (Orlan-10, Orlan-30) is the Russian company Special Technology Center (STC), located in St. Petersburg.
        UAV company Kronstadt
        The manufacturer of the Forpost UAV is the Ural Plant of Civil Aviation (UZGA).
  10. -1
    April 7 2026 14: 23
    Alas.
    In reality, it makes sense.
    There is no war, and an intensified arms race is underway.

    Based on videos on the now-banned YouTube, high-quality models made from foam and sticks, using ready-made plans, were being assembled in garages 15 years ago. Whether it was a Su-57 or an F16.

    That is, with cheap AI, putting something together is no problem. Alas.

    And the tactics of flying at altitude, selecting a target, and then diving have been known since WW1.
    Alas.
  11. +4
    April 7 2026 14: 26
    What's odd is that such news surprises war correspondents first and foremost, not those "positionally" required to respond. As long as the development of new weapons remains the responsibility of "effective" managers from structures like Rostec, rather than military specialists, it's naive to expect any changes.
    1. -6
      April 7 2026 16: 23
      bug120560, those who are supposed to be surprised by them are not surprised.
      We have a similar UAV, Lightning.
      UAV production in Russia has increased 30-fold.

      By 2024, the Russian Armed Forces will receive more than 1,5 million drones of various types.
      1. -1
        April 7 2026 16: 51
        So, according to you, the troops received only 50 drones in 2023. Why are you disgracing the country's military-industrial complex? A pro-Ukrainian element.
      2. 0
        April 7 2026 21: 49
        Igor M., it's immediately obvious you've never seriously examined or delved into the matter, contenting yourself with mere fluff from official sources. UAVs are a cheap substitute that can only dominate where mass-scale destruction capabilities aren't available. Such relatively inexpensive systems, designed specifically for destroying drones, have been adopted or are being adopted by virtually all leading militaries around the world, including the American Bullfrog robotic drone-shooting system and the MADIS air defense system for the Marine Corps, the German Natter 7.62 combat module and Condor anti-aircraft missile and artillery system, the Swedish Kreuger-100 interception system, and the French Serval ARLAD. Chinese models could also be added to this list. Only in Russia, where the "highly effective Rostec" dominates military equipment, is absolutely nothing being done, judging by the results.
        1. -4
          April 8 2026 01: 07
          bug120560, let's look towards the Persian Gulf. There, a whole host of countries can't shoot down Iran's primitive drones. The US, the Gulf states, Pakistan, Israel, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces with their counter-drones. And air defense from South Korea. No way.
          We have all kinds of drones made here. I even read about one bakery.
          Google AI replies:

          As of 2025, there are approximately 889 companies in Russia developing and manufacturing unmanned aerial systems, including drones, for the needs of the military. This number includes both small and medium-sized businesses and large research and production centers. The industry is rapidly growing: 163 new companies were created in 2024 alone.
          1. +4
            April 8 2026 08: 55
            Igor M., you're reasoning like a little child. Based on what information are you drawing your optimistic conclusions? Based on the enthusiastic reports of domestic media and Iran? As for the "can-do" part, it's all explained simply—it's war, the kind that never happens without losses. Now try to name even one completely defunct US base in the B.V.? Regarding new domestic companies developing and producing unmanned aerial systems, I'll tell you this: they're at the level of home-brewed designs and garage assembly from Chinese components. If we're speaking figuratively, as a historical allegory, about the inflated problem of drone dominance, then all our actions are an attempt to solve the problem of high losses of the single-seat IL-2 by increasing its production volumes, instead of placing a gunner behind the pilot to protect the tail.
            1. -1
              April 9 2026 05: 21
              bug120560, as we see, the media not only publishes enthusiastic reports, but also leaks information.
              We have no other sources of information besides the internet and the media. Or do you have your own intelligence agency?
              Therefore, the challenge is to correctly find and analyze the available data.
              By the way, today I came across some new information:
              Domestic interceptor drone Lis-2.
              KVN-35 drone with optical fiber with a range of up to 35 km.
              ZALA Z-16 AI-powered reconnaissance drones.

              Onboard electronics independently analyze the image, detect objects, including camouflaged equipment, and mark identified targets

              Has any infrastructure in Russia been completely destroyed using drones? Name it.

              https://youtu.be/VhqqG-ycCgM

              This number includes .. and large research and production centers.

              Just as you just insulted the Kalashnikov concern, the world's largest drone factory in Yelabuga, the Ural Civil Aviation Plant (the Forpost UAV), the Special Technology Center LLC in St. Petersburg (they've been making the Orlan UAV for 14 years), and so on.
              Not only Chinese

              Microchips manufactured in the Netherlands were found in Russian drones.

              Remember that in addition to drones, we also have FAB, ODAB, OFZAB with UMPK, Iskander OTRK, Kalibr, TOS, etc.
              I am sure that all this is "at the level of home design and garage assembly from Chinese components."
              Aren't you tired of exaggerating?
              1. 0
                April 9 2026 08: 50
                Igor M., regarding "our own intelligence" and sources of information—yes, I, like everyone else, have "my own intelligence"—the ability not only to see and hear, but also to think for myself, not content with the conclusions of others. Regarding the infrastructure destroyed by UAVs—have you heard anything about 20% of strategic aviation or the oil depot in Novoshakhtinsk being reduced to ashes? As for "we have it," I can only answer you with the words of "Song of Chile" from the rock opera "The Star and Death of Joaquin Murieta":

                At school, from childhood, we were taught,
                There is no country more wonderful than Chile.
                As the poet said, as the poet said.
                There are deserts and volcanoes
                Islands and oceans.
                There is only no life, only no life.


                Your attitude to what is happening is best characterized by the words of the Russian poet A. Zhemchuzhnikov:

                All your tendency to optimism
                - from the inability to imagine
                what kind of enema tomorrow,
                Destiny is ready to give you
                1. 0
                  April 10 2026 03: 36
                  bug120560, but your ability is somehow one-sided. You only notice the bad, or not even the actual bad, but someone's biased opinion that this or that is bad. And so your perceptions are heavily skewed toward the negative, and your assessments are highly biased. And I don't understand the point of this.
                  Well, not 20%. I think only one plane was destroyed, and the rest were damaged. So, didn't Iran destroy several US planes and helicopters with Shahids? Including an AWACS aircraft, tanker aircraft, a Chinook helicopter, etc.

                  The Boeing E-3 Sentry is one of the most expensive and scarce air platforms in the US fleet.

                  Actually, you're a bit confused. Because the Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery has already been finished off with Storm Shadow missiles.

                  Ukraine again struck an oil refinery in Novoshakhtinsk, Rostov Oblast. This time, the Ukrainian Armed Forces used Anglo-French Storm Shadow missiles.

                  Before this, the refinery had restored operations every time after UAV attacks.

                  Reuters: Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery Resumes Operations Following Ukrainian Drone Attack.

                  We need to collect information more thoroughly. More thoroughly.
                  1. 0
                    April 10 2026 09: 15
                    Igor M., I already told you that I live in Rostov-on-Don, and it's 62 km from my house to Novoshakhtinsk. But that's a minor detail; you know better from the capital. And one more thing: don't you think an oil refinery and an oil depot are somewhat different things? As for the rest, read the lines of the Russian poet A. Zhemchuzhnikov again. And if you don't want to understand that heading toward the abyss has only one end result, regardless of whether you approach it sitting on a stool or in a comfortable chair, you might as well blindfold yourself and cover your ears.
                    1. 0
                      April 10 2026 22: 47
                      bug120560, it's impossible to see everything with your own eyes. That's where the Internet comes in.
                      An oil depot is really just a few barrels of oil. It's not an infrastructure facility. They're hit for PR—they burn beautifully for the reports, and the damage is minimal. I came across a separate Ukrainian article on this topic—why are the Ukrainian Armed Forces choosing PR instead of attempting to inflict real damage? They might as well say that a drone strike destroyed three vehicles and that Russia is now doomed to defeat.
                      Well, we've been on the brink of disaster before, in the 90s. Thank God, the new authorities have since pulled the country back from the brink and firmly set a course in the opposite direction.
                      You're biased; for some reason, you only collect negative information, some of which is simply incorrect. Hence your pessimistic conclusions and predictions. But there's far more good in our country, and the good outweighs it.
                      1. -1
                        April 11 2026 10: 12
                        Igor M., why so crudely resort to demagoguery and attribute to me things I never said? Regarding the comparison between today and the 90s, have you ever tried to analyze what's happening using a historical example to understand it? At least compare the causes, events, and results of the 90s and 2000s with the period of the VOR and industrialization. As Klyuchevsky used to say:

                        Learn History
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. 0
                        April 12 2026 08: 27
                        Igor M., I have absolutely no desire to change your mind. It's hard to get through to someone who's been blindsided by rose-colored glasses and has had their ears stuffed with "bananas." Please understand—all these newly opened enterprises can't replace the one GPZ-10, which was ruined by "effective" managers, or the one Optron Stavropol, which was driven to bankruptcy, and which stopped producing helicopters at the Nagibin Russian Military Production Association.
    2. +1
      April 8 2026 14: 49
      Quote: bug120560
      The strange thing is that such news surprises war correspondents first and foremost, and not those who are supposed to react to it.

      Are you seriously suggesting that the guys from the Ministry of Defense and the defense industry should somehow respond to the chatter of so-called "war correspondents" and commentators on Reporter and VO? 🤣 You made my day!
      1. 0
        April 8 2026 18: 55
        k7k8, the guys from the Ministry of Defense and the defense industry must respond promptly to the emergence of new weapons systems by the enemy. And you can laugh at anything, it depends on your state of mind.
        1. +2
          April 8 2026 21: 14
          You think, without a second thought, that they know nothing and do nothing? Notice, you said that. I told you that the chatterboxes from the yellow, so-called "patriotic" press are not a source of information for them.
  12. +1
    April 7 2026 15: 48
    can fly up to 17 km

    What kind of delusional conclusion is this? What's the point of it then, and where does such precision—up to the 7th—come from? It sounds like a poorly executed expert's analysis, or a desire to devalue the enemy's research through blah-blah-blah.
    1. -2
      April 7 2026 16: 24
      Ales, and just below they wrote about the range of 40 km.
      I couldn't find any information on how much charge it carries.
      What a horror story.
  13. -4
    April 7 2026 15: 51
    So, it turns out that this isn't a small drone, since it's an airplane-type, but a medium one. And how far does it fly? One place says 17 km, another 40 km.
    Well, if he has a connection via Starlink, then we can try to jam it with electronic warfare.
    It is not specified how many of them approximately appeared on the LBS.
    I wonder how Yolka will work on them.
    We also have similar ones, Lightning.
    1. +1
      April 7 2026 16: 33
      They explained to you that electronic warfare doesn't work on them.
      1. -3
        April 8 2026 00: 47
        Serj Iff, it also says the communication channel is through Starlink. They can be easily suppressed.
        1. 0
          April 8 2026 12: 51
          Quote: Igor M.
          Serj Iff, it also says the communication channel is through Starlink. They can be easily suppressed.

          To apply pressure to something, you need to know the specific frequency and have a multiple of its gain. If the frequency is floating, you'll be exhausted trying to apply pressure.
          1. -1
            April 9 2026 06: 57
            Mish, they say you only need to configure your own channels for Krasukha-5. Everything else is completely jammed, including satellite communications.
    2. +1
      April 7 2026 18: 50
      Can you imagine a neutral zone more than 40 km wide and several hundred km long?
  14. 0
    April 7 2026 18: 04
    Yes, this is the reality today. Sad!
  15. +5
    April 7 2026 18: 47
    Quote: kriten
    There's one question: when will we have something similar? If Chemezov were to be tasked with it, it would be in about three years. If we were to task those who can do it and give them some extra money, without giving it all to Chemezov, it would definitely be sooner. Innovations aren't meant for corporations; the main thing there is money.

    The same question was asked of the Navy when the Americans got the Aegis. That was over 40 years ago. There's still no equivalent. But everyone's been telling stories about the Petrels.
    1. -2
      April 8 2026 20: 43
      Quote: AC130 Ganship
      Aegis.

      Not combat-ready! It turned out to be just a Russian, but American.
      1. 0
        April 9 2026 02: 41
        It's been proven time and again that it's quite combat-ready. No other country in the world has an air defense system with 100% efficiency.
  16. -1
    April 7 2026 22: 33
    It is necessary to create screens of fighter drones (waiters) on enemy territory; such unique air defense zones should extend behind enemy lines up to 100 km from the LBS. Any enemy UAV launch should lead to its detection, the fighter that detected it immediately takes off and either destroys it from behind, or passes it on to its neighbor, who is waiting in the next square. Moreover, when an enemy UAV takes off, the coordinates of the enemy UAV operator control point become known, and a strike with a geranium, or even a fab, immediately follows.
  17. 0
    April 7 2026 23: 37
    As I've written repeatedly, delaying the strategic war will lead to nothing good. Either deploy nuclear weapons or quickly reach a deal. The enemy's drone strikes are increasing, and the Western military-industrial complex is gaining momentum.
    1. +1
      April 8 2026 09: 39
      Regarding peace, they will pressure us with even greater ferocity. In the current situation, there is only one way to strike a deal, on the enemy's terms. For now, they seem to agree to a line on personal combat, without leaving Donbass, but they are not blind, and not fools, they understand that we are fighting with meat, and their technological lead is becoming more and more significant, and the balance of power is leaning in that direction.

      Of course, this wouldn't happen if we made fairly simple decisions, but why this isn't happening now is an incredible mystery, it's just a stupor.

      So I'm thinking that something unprecedented is happening on our side - what's stopping us from starting a massive production of drones, refining some of their types, continuing their modification and improvement? There won't even be scorched earth left of Ukraine within a few months. Why nuclear weapons? If you automate drone warfare, why hire 50-100 thousand operators? Everything is free, only the programs, training, and takeoff and landing operations can also be carried out by automated systems. 1, 2, 3 million robotic operators - we just need to organize the mass production of both the drones themselves and the automated systems for their control. Of course, generals don't understand these things, narrow specialists are needed, so it is precisely from today's UAV operators, their backbone, that the command staff should be staffed. The main forces on the front now are drones, they should be used to fight, and the most vulnerable forces are attack aircraft, infantry, it is incredible on our side, but we are fighting with them today.

      In short, the one who is on the offensive loses more, but it has less of an impact on the enemy, as he has a technological advantage.
  18. SYG
    +2
    April 8 2026 07: 02
    Since these drones are using Starlink satellite communications, maybe it's time to clear space of these satellites and start dropping them on Earth?
    Say hello to Elon Musk and his brainchild! 😉
    We have no communication and neither does the enemy.
    And we'll all be on equal terms. 😄
  19. -1
    April 8 2026 10: 21
    As always, the crests are ahead with innovation. They'll eventually take over Donbas, and maybe even more. Russia probably doesn't deserve to be an independent state with a government like this.
    1. +1
      April 8 2026 17: 42
      As always, the crests are ahead with innovation.

      The crests are just meat. The West is the technology. The only solution is nuclear strikes.
  20. 0
    April 8 2026 10: 56
    So we don't have a war. They've invented some kind of SVO. It looks like the relaxation continues, especially in the rear.
  21. 0
    April 8 2026 13: 50
    So here we are, with your red markers! The entire NATO force, with its technical and engineering capabilities, is working on the 404... hi More to come!!! In my opinion, it's time to at least tear down the underwater internet cables, and at most, thin out the satellites and/or attack the surveillance bases—otherwise, they'll hit us with a nuclear strike in 404! Especially since the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service has already reported this. Considering NATO's actions since 16 regarding arms deliveries, they're probably pretty well prepared. bully
  22. 0
    April 8 2026 17: 39
    I confirm the qualitative leap forward of Ukrainian UAVs.

    And here they are proposing another 2 years of war... This is simply impossible, since it will lead to Russia's defeat.
    It's time to use it against Ukraine, first against the airfields and testing grounds of its western part of the TNW.
  23. +1
    April 8 2026 19: 05
    Without science, there can be no qualitative leap. And scientists are scarce. We have to catch them, so they don't go to hell. They pay more there. smile

    It is not the Ukrainians who are jumping so well, but some other individuals.
  24. IZ
    0
    April 8 2026 23: 41
    What's to come... We've come this far... It will be a hundred years' war ((( Although this was to be expected. Well, let's say there are 100 million of us and 400 million of the EU. Will we compare industrial potential and technology???
  25. 0
    April 9 2026 08: 17
    Only automatically guided cannons or rifles, mounted on absolutely every vehicle and armored vehicle, will appease the Euro-aggressors. The fascists need all these negotiations to prolong the war as much as possible and accelerate the European military machine to the point of causing us unacceptable damage. And everything is heading in that direction. If we don't already attract the resources of China's combat systems, we will no longer be able to keep up with the Europeans on our own.
  26. 0
    April 9 2026 23: 05
    Unlike us, they don’t sit around and mope, but try to act more decisively and decisively, which is something that our leadership sorely lacks.
  27. 0
    April 10 2026 08: 39
    D. Demilitarization according to the Kremlin.
  28. 0
    April 12 2026 14: 28
    I don't understand the military from the Ministry of Defense. They offer two options: wrap yourself in nets or flee to Siberia! From 1941 to 1945, the air defense mission was a hundred times more difficult! Back then, thousands of German and other bombers flew daily, carrying a ton or two, and at exactly twice the speed, with pilots, weapons, and a range of 1000 km. And the Red Army air defense shot them down, preventing them from breaking through! Except in cases of outright treachery, 3% reached their target!