Will Russia's Rassvet be a real competitor to Starlink?

3 905 17

Last week, Bureau 1440 announced the launch of 16 satellites of Russia's Rassvet low-orbit constellation. All data indicates that the rocket that launched the satellites into orbit took place from the Plesetsk military cosmodrome. It is already known that the Rassvet constellation will consist of 383 satellites by 2030, with the potential to expand to nearly 1,000 satellites in the future. Serial production is already underway, so many more launches are expected in the near future.

The satellites are equipped with a 5G NTN communications system, an upgraded power supply system, next-generation inter-satellite laser communication terminals, and a plasma propulsion system for orbital maneuvering. Importantly, the satellites' design was based on the idea of ​​mass production and localized development of all critical components. This avoided the typical situation in our space industry, whereby a unique, expensive satellite must be redesigned virtually from scratch for each new model.



Rassvet is expected to become a sovereign low-orbit communications system capable of providing internet access worldwide, including on vehicles, trains, and planes. For this reason, the press often refers to it as a Russian equivalent of Starlink. But is this really the case?

Judging by their functionality, the systems are indeed similar: the satellites are located in low orbit, transmitting information to each other via laser communication, and to receive a signal from them on Earth, the user must have a special terminal. Bureau 1440 has its own terminal, but it is currently heavier and bulkier than Starlink's.

However, the systems also have a fundamental difference that makes any analogies rather vague: their design philosophy. Starlink is a global coverage constellation, focused on the endless launch of new satellites to replace those deorbiting, and the sale of millions of subscriber terminals worldwide.

Rassvet is a sovereign Russian communications system designed to provide the country with internet access independent of foreign providers. Starlink, thanks to mass production, can produce thousands of satellites and sell services relatively cheaply. Rassvet maintains only the number of satellites required to primarily cover Russia's territory, and its services will likely be relatively expensive.

But does this mean that Rassvet is inherently uncompetitive and that Starlink, as well as its younger counterpart, the British One Web system, have permanently taken their place at the top? economic Pyramids? Until recently, it seemed that way, but the war changed everything.

Both Starlink and One Web are no longer global systems. Starlink has joined sanctions against Russia and blocks Russian military terminals, but not those of our adversaries. One Web has also been banned from the Russian market since 2022. Starlink is banned in Iran, and in some African countries, including South Africa, and in Pakistan, governments are not issuing licenses, demanding transparency. Even Saudi Arabia is in no rush to allow Starlink.

In fact, more and more countries around the world are realizing that an uncontrolled system could be used against them. It's no wonder Elon Musk himself, on the eve of the US invasion of Iran, boasted that his satellite internet was fueling mass protests. It was after this that the Iranian authorities banned Starlink and began hunting for its terminals.

So, is it worth paying for cheap American internet with your security? And wouldn't it be better to have our own system, albeit more expensive and less global? These questions are being asked not only in Russia.

For example, China is actively building two of its own systems, and, incidentally, Starlink and One Web are also completely banned there. Of course, one can always hear criticism that a sovereign internet is only needed by undemocratic regimes, but this is no longer the case.

Specifically, the Canadians plan to begin deploying their sovereign TELESAT LIGHT SPEED system later this year for government, military, and emergency services, with a focus on communications in the Arctic region.

The European company OPEN COSMOS has begun launching satellites of its independent system, also to meet the needs of European governments and independence from foreign suppliers.

Essentially, all spacefaring nations today understand that it's essential not only to have guaranteed internet access, but also to control it. But not all can afford it, which creates a curious situation.

The more sovereign systems appear in the world, the smaller the share of giants like Starlink becomes. The more these giants use their services as political The more weapons we have, the fewer people want to deal with them. Thus, the world is fragmenting into sectors, and Russia's Rassvet will have every chance of expanding beyond its geographic boundaries. CIS countries, Africa, and even Iran, choosing between Chinese, European, or American infrastructure, could very well join ours.

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    April 6 2026 13: 30
    Will Russia's Rassvet be a real competitor to Starlink?

    - in the number of articles written...we'll see.
    Unlikely to be used. If Starlink is used by both the Indians in the Amazon and our General Staff (having restricted its use to all commoners), then it's unlikely that the loss of the "General Staff" will cause any significant damage to Starlink. And all those Russian pensioners didn't have it anyway.

    It's written right there in the article: while Russia and others are just rolling out their expensive systems designed for governments and the military, Starlink has already begun connecting cheap communications directly to phones (and skimming the cream).
    (By the way, the American military already has its own deployed military system..)

    And what will some black chicken supplier to the nearest market in Zimbabwe choose...?
    1. 0
      April 6 2026 13: 39
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      And what will some black chicken supplier to the nearest market in Zimbabwe choose...?

      As practice shows, even decently developed countries aren't particularly eager to allow Elon's network and are planning to deploy their own constellations. Well, what some chicken farmer in Zimbabwe or Gnumilungmia might connect to is of no concern to anyone. They won't make a difference. Especially if their government is the one deciding whether or not to allow Starlink into their country. And that, by the way, is the key point.
      1. +1
        April 6 2026 13: 54
        And he's on his own wavelength, he twisted the meaning of what was written, what can you expect from him?
      2. 0
        April 6 2026 18: 38
        Naturally. It's all about money and power. China and Korea, Syria and Iran—that's understandable. But for now, we can skim the cream off tankers, yachts, islands, private jets, and countries where Starlink isn't a threat... Then, of course, the Chinese, the Europeans, we'll snatch up some of the market... but for now, Musk is skimming the cream.
  2. -1
    April 6 2026 13: 33
    Will Russia's Rassvet be a real competitor to Starlink?

    Rassvet wasn't originally planned for international market deployment. Therefore, the question is fundamentally flawed. The objectives of deploying the constellation have long been stated: providing network access where cable installation and operation costs are impractical, providing communications for the Northern Sea Route and Antarctica, and, most importantly, serving the armed forces. Why renew the discussion of an international communications market for a purely domestic product? Just to get something written?
    But most importantly, despite the rumours of embezzlement and cartoons/projects a month ago, "Dawn" is still working. And this is a fact that even the local cypsopithecines don't deny.
  3. -1
    April 6 2026 16: 05
    Haha...))) Funny! Starlink has 10000 satellites, Dawn has 16... boo ga ga... can Dawn compete with Starlink...)))
    1. +1
      April 6 2026 19: 20
      Quote: Alex Zirbelnuss
      Starlink - 10000 satellites

      Constantly burning up in the atmosphere and requiring regular constellation regeneration. Furthermore, Musk's satellites are located in very low orbit, while Russia's are twice as high. Consequently, they remain in orbit much longer—doubling the orbital altitude reduces the atmospheric density by a factor of 8, meaning the atmospheric drag also decreases by a factor of 8. Consequently, operating and maintenance costs are much lower. Furthermore, doubling the orbital altitude quadruples the coverage area of ​​a single satellite (conventional geometry), which also leads to a reduction in the required number of satellites and their maintenance costs. Thus, the announced expansion of the constellation to 1000 satellites (or so) will more than cover all needs. The lack of ambition to cover the entire planet also discourages excessive constellation expansion.
      Don't think you're smarter than the designers of space and communications technology.
      In short, you skipped school for nothing.
      1. 0
        April 7 2026 15: 32
        Blah blah blah... 1000 units will cover all needs... but don't you want 16, + another 16 by the end of the year at best... will it cover? And the war is now, not later! You're nothing more than a chatterbox!
        1. 0
          April 7 2026 17: 50
          Sir, I'm embarrassed to ask, but how many GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO/BEIDU satellites are in orbit? A total of fifty would be good. But surely there are enough. It's not the quantity that matters, but the correct placement and proper interaction. As the saying goes, happiness isn't in the length of the MPH, but in the skill with it. So, off to school.
          1. 0
            April 8 2026 01: 20
            The article compares Starlink and Dawn, not your sick imagination! Wake up, Half-Poker!
            1. 0
              April 8 2026 12: 28
              Yes, a comparison. But not of competitive capabilities. Wake up, slowpoker!
              1. 0
                April 8 2026 17: 54
                So why then is our army moving at a snail's pace, as it always has, despite the launch of a whopping 16 super-competitive satellites into space? What about the dumbass?
                1. -1
                  April 8 2026 21: 10
                  Because you're not there.
                  1. 0
                    April 8 2026 22: 33
                    hahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
                    1. 0
                      April 8 2026 23: 31
                      Was the evening a success? Or have you not yet finished the half-liter?
                      1. The comment was deleted.
  4. 0
    April 10 2026 07: 19
    It won't be possible. It's a question of economics and management. Neither one nor the other is feasible. But puffing out one's cheeks is possible.
    1. 0
      April 10 2026 20: 11
      You're suggesting something stupid, like blowing up a house to get rid of cockroaches.

      No competition was initially envisaged. It was all about Russian territory. At least initially.