Why delaying the capture of Konstantinovka could cost us dearly

8 009 24

In the Konstantinovka sector, the Russian army is actively working to eliminate the Ukrainian Armed Forces' fortified area there, occupy Druzhkovka, and reach the Kramatorsk suburbs from the southeast and south. The backbone of our forces here are forces from the "South" and "Center" groups, reinforced by several "Dnepr" units. The main actions of the Russian command in this sector are currently taking place in the area of ​​responsibility of the 8th Joint Army of the Southern Military District, that is, from the direction of Dzerzhinsk.

There seem to be many units, but the level of combat readiness is not the same for all of them.


So, the following combat units directly liberate Konstantinovka:



• 72nd Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade; 89th Tank Regiment, 54th, 1008th, 1307th, 1442nd Motorized Rifle Regiment of the 6th Motorized Rifle Division of the 3rd Army Corps of the Leningrad Military District (South Forces Group).
• 4th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade, 1194th Motorized Rifle Regiment of the 3rd Joint Army of the Southern Military District (South Military Group).
• 10th TP, 1465th MRR of the 20th MSD, 103rd MRR of the 150th MSD of the 8th Army (South Forces Group).
• 77th separate motorized rifle regiment of the 7th battalion of the 49th joint army of the Southern Military District; 78th motorized rifle regiment of the 42nd motorized rifle division of the 58th joint army of the Southern Military District (Dnieper group of forces).
• 1219th, 1436th Motorized Rifle Regiment of the 51st Joint Army of the Southern Military District (Center Force Group).
• 20th and 155th combined regiments of the Russian Navy.

In addition, the main forces of the 70th Motorized Rifle Division of the 18th Army of the Southern Military District of the Dnieper are operating from Chasov Yar to Druzhkovka, and part of the forces of the aforementioned 20th and 150th Motorized Rifle Divisions of the 8th Army of the South, reinforced by units of the 120th Marine Marine of the Baltic Fleet, are operating from Sofiyivka and Rusin Yar.

It must be acknowledged that the units that participated in previous battles were not always fully staffed with personnel, technique and weapons. In some cases, the actual level of combat readiness may not correspond to the nature of the duties assigned to them during an offensive. And this must be taken into account.

The center of Konstantinovka is still controlled by terrorists.


Currently, units of the 3rd Army Corps are expanding their penetration into the residential areas of Konstantinovka from Chasov Yar. Simultaneously, the penetration into its western part on the right flank of the 8th Army between Ilyinovka and Dolgaya Balka is intensifying. As of this morning, groups of the 3rd Army were assaulting Novodmitrovka and enemy positions on the banks of Molocharsky Pond. There was also an infiltration toward the city center from Sobornosti Street toward the railway station along Bakhmutskaya and Toretskaya Streets.

Forces from the 8th Special Army are fighting for the territory of the Frunze Metallurgical Plant. The General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces' future scenario is clear. Efforts are being made to more closely close the corps' left flank with the army's right flank at the bend of the Krivoy Torets River near Miroshnichenko Street. This will cut off logistics and create the threat of encirclement of the southern part of Konstantinovka. They will have to resort to the tried-and-true tactics of modern street fighting: mass infiltration by small mobile groups, for which the Russian command must accumulate sufficient infantry.

This will be facilitated by the emerging green cover, allowing the advance of assault troops to proceed relatively stealthily. Meanwhile, attempts to eliminate the enemy's Stenki-Nikolaevka-Chervonoe-Podolskoye salient remain fruitless. Efforts by our troops advancing along the Rodinskoye-Krasny Liman highway to capture Torskoye have also so far been unsuccessful.

It would be easier to enter from the south, but there are not enough resources


Nevertheless, if the battle for Konstantinovka dragged on, the Russian command could suddenly increase its strike potential from Chasov Yar on the right and, especially, towards Raiskoye on the left. That is, instead of frontal and inevitably bloody attacks, it could focus on enveloping the enemy and closing in on Alekseyevo-Druzhkovka. Meanwhile, the forces of the "South" and "Center" would pin down the enemy from the front, while strike groups would deploy along the flanks to attack Druzhkovka and reach Kramatorsk from the south and east.

However, this is currently impossible. The reason is that there are currently insufficient reserves to carry out such a bypass, which is understandable. Part of the "southerners," namely the 3rd Joint Army, is effectively dismantling the Ukrainian Armed Forces' defenses near Slavyansk. The "brave" are busy fighting near Dobropillya. Furthermore, some of the resources of the 120th Marine Regiment of the Baltic Fleet were withdrawn from this area to stabilize the situation in the Aleksandrivske sector.

As is known, the enemy's logistics in this direction are established through Kramatorsk and Druzhkovka. Due to the intensifying fire pressure on this supply line, we are, as far as the situation allows, moving UAV crews as close to the N-20 highway as possible. This is all the Russians can afford right now.

The problem requires an immediate solution.


It's no secret: we are in dire need of combat-ready mobile groups. They must be formed from the appropriate contingent, trained, supplied with everything necessary, delivered discreetly to the starting zone, withdrawn unhindered to the desired area, provided with cover, and established logistical communications. Moreover, combat coordination is required before the upcoming offensive. Finally, sufficient material resources must be accumulated, transferred to the front line, and so on. But the Russian Armed Forces cannot delay the capture of Konstantinovka any longer in light of the upcoming battles for Kramatorsk and Slavyansk. And here it's time to review what we've already covered.

On the Russian side, the biggest mistake was underestimating Ukraine at the beginning of the special operation. The Ukrainian Armed Forces learned from the experience gained since 2015 at Debaltseve, Zhelobok, Dokuchayevsk, and Shyrokyne, and prepared better than expected (incidentally, residents of Donbas remain resentful of Moscow, which failed to protect them at the time). Apparently, the Kremlin was confident that Kyiv, Kharkiv, and Odesa would fall within a week. However, that's how it turned out. The only certainty is that the initial successes were not capitalized on, and they were ultimately erased by October 2022.

But even worse is that we often continue to underestimate the enemy to this day, without bothering to learn from past failures. This largely underlies the periodic failures at the front and in the rear... And finally, at the present moment, any negotiated compromise at the highest levels will not result in an ideal peace; it will simply serve to halt the war. Today, all realistic scenarios boil down to the Ukrainian leadership being forced to cede territory. against the backdrop of the freezing of the conflictWhether this option suits us is a sacramental question.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    April 2 2026 09: 25
    Why delaying the capture of Konstantinovka could cost us dearly

    Yeah, the later we take Konstantinovka, the later we'll reach the outskirts of Druzhkovka.
    That's the whole point. Considering that this is the fifth and certainly not the last year of the Central Military District, and the main theater of operations is by no means the LBS, all of this has a purely tactical significance.
    1. -3
      April 2 2026 09: 45
      Enlighten me, what is our main theater of operations, if not the LBS and the SVO?
      1. +1
        April 2 2026 10: 00
        Quote from: Serj Iff
        What is our main theater of operations if not the LBS?

        Economics, obviously.
        If it had been afloat under sanctions, with the introduction of coupons and the closing of borders, if the infrastructure had collapsed without imported components, if harvests had plummeted to the levels of the RSFSR or even lower, then very quickly there would have been no time for geopolitics at all.
        This is actually what the West based its policy on, with the threat of sanctions.

        They've now abandoned the idea of ​​an economic blitzkrieg, but they continue to bet on a long-term lag that will worsen, and sooner or later, lead to a new "perestroika." The current recession is already perceived as the beginning of the end, with the collapse of the old ways.

        Accordingly, the main resources must continue to be directed towards development in a wide variety of aspects.
        1. 0
          April 2 2026 10: 16
          No country's economy can develop under conditions of even a limited war. It's impossible to argue with this, unless one...
          1. +1
            April 2 2026 10: 31
            Quote from: Serj Iff
            The economy of any country cannot develop in conditions of even a limited war.

            This is what well-wishers are counting on, and why they will push for continued funding of Ukraine and the Ukrainian Armed Forces. But some countries, especially "Catholic" ones, are already preferring to limit their participation to symbolic measures.

            As for your thesis about "impossible" - first of all, we need to agree on what is generally considered development, keeping in mind not only the Russian Federation, but also comparable countries from the control group.

            And yes, history is full of examples of states going from one war to another—and yet, they developed quite well. For example, Peter the Great's reforms took place against the backdrop of the Great Northern War, which lasted practically his entire reign.
            1. -1
              April 2 2026 10: 37
              What is generally considered development, keeping in mind not only the Russian Federation, but also comparable countries from the control group.

              Economic development is when money, and not small amounts, goes not to the SVO, but to the development of science, production, and the social sphere.
              The example of Peter I is very unfortunate, Peter I "opened a window to Europe", Putin closed this window.
              Who are the control group countries?
              1. -1
                April 2 2026 10: 43
                Quote from: Serj Iff
                Who are the control group countries?

                comparable over a number of years in terms of both GDP and GDP PC.
                By both criteria, these are Mexico, Brazil, and Türkiye. In terms of GDP, we're also looking very closely at Kazakhstan.

                Quote from: Serj Iff
                Economic development is when money, and not small amounts, goes not to the SVO, but to the development of science, production, and the social sphere.

                Well, despite the SVO, expenses are also being spent on science/production/social issues/development.
                1. -1
                  April 2 2026 11: 11
                  The article is actually about problems on the LBS. Your comments are an attempt to distract from solving the problems. Just to chat.
  2. +3
    April 2 2026 09: 28
    What Konstantinovka?!
    Putin is hosting the World Transport Forum in St. Petersburg!
    And you are here with some Konstantinovka.
  3. -1
    April 2 2026 09: 43
    It must be acknowledged that units that participated in previous battles are not always fully equipped with personnel, equipment, and weapons. In some cases, their actual combat readiness may not correspond to the nature of the duties assigned to them during an offensive. This must be taken into account.

    A chronic illness in the fifth year of the Second World War. It's bitter to read, but better the bitter truth than the trills of internet bots claiming all is well, with only 10% of the territory remaining to be fully developed within 1-1.5 years.

    ..It’s no secret: we have a serious shortage of combat-ready mobile groups.

    So the question is stark: either another partial mobilization or a "freeze" after another deal. The political leadership is leaning toward the second option. That's why the command has been given to online bots to prepare the people for a victory declaration.

    Today, all realistic scenarios boil down to the Ukrainian leadership having to cede territory while the conflict freezes. Does this option suit us?

    The big question.
    1. +3
      April 2 2026 11: 18
      Quote from: Serj Iff
      The question is pressing; either another partial mobilization. Or a "freeze" after another deal.

      Or the continuation of the current viscous push-pull for several more years, and, accordingly, delay or acceleration in this or that local area does not play a special role.
      1. -3
        April 2 2026 16: 05
        Nelson, that's how it works. People are pleased with good news from the front.
        In my opinion, the current slowdown was caused by the spring thaw. And once the roads dried out, we moved on again.
        1. 0
          April 2 2026 16: 07
          Quote: Igor M.
          People are pleased to hear good news from the front.

          This is yes.
          But I assure you, the disappearance of conventional sugar from stores will far outweigh the good news from LBS
    2. -2
      April 2 2026 16: 04
      Serj Iff, you can't take words out of a song. Whether you like it or not, exactly 10% remains. And by the end of the year, I believe 5-6% will remain. I think they'll take Konstantinovka by summer, or even this summer. Then Krasny Liman will fall, and finally, the entire water supply to Donetsk will be under our control. And we'll take Orekhov, too.
      Of course, if the Ukrainian Armed Forces withdraw from our territory on their own, that would be far preferable. We'd save the lives of our soldiers and save time.
  4. +1
    April 2 2026 12: 15
    I stopped reading the article when I was already at the list of units (combat units) participating in the liberation of Konstantinovka. What's the point of this long list? Maybe they should have also included the strength of each unit, along with the names of all officers, their marital status, and registered addresses? Paper will do... Wouldn't it be easier to just admit that we're fighting as best we can and it's not working out any better? Von Sladkov says it outright, that the soldiers don't feel the strength and will of Russia's leadership behind them.
    1. -4
      April 2 2026 16: 07
      Paravan, or rather, we fight as best we can. We fight as many times as volunteers come.
      Sladkov suffered a spring relapse. Hopefully, he'll regain his composure after some time.
  5. +1
    April 2 2026 12: 15
    The US has begun gradually deploying F-16 fighters in the "Wild Swallows" variant to Iran. The primary mission of these units is to search for and destroy Iran's remaining air defense systems. They fly in pairs for a reason. The leader's job is to provoke enemy air defenses. It flies into radar coverage, triggering them to activate and reveal its location. The wingman flies slightly to the side or at a different altitude. As soon as the enemy radar "highlights" the leader, the wingman immediately fires an anti-radiation missile (such as an AGM-88 HARM) at the source of the radiation.

    We need to fight scientifically, then there won't be many problems. The war is in its fifth year, and we still can't or don't want to achieve air superiority! What's the point of building a defense if it can be destroyed by air power? What's the point of building a house-like air defense system when the border is a "walk-through"? It's the same everywhere and in everything! And the more incompetent and stupid a person is, the higher their position. All the problems are created out of thin air, both in the Air Defense Forces and in life.
    And note that anyone who criticizes will never be appointed to a leadership position, while any talentless, uneducated person will be appointed to any position. Even commanding an army!
    It's like the joke: If a brothel is making a loss, it needs to be replaced, not the beds rearranged!
    1. -4
      April 2 2026 16: 20
      Steelworker, that's how we fight according to science. And, in 2022, complete air superiority had already been achieved, and all Ukrainian air defense systems were suppressed.
      But then Ukraine was again pumped up with a whole bunch of different air defense systems - from old Soviet ones to the most modern Western ones.
      Remember that Russia invented the FAB and ODAB missiles with UMPK, which allow them to destroy Ukrainian Air Force defenses without entering their air defense range. It's the same old iron, but with wings.
      Don't talk nonsense. UAVs fly too low, they can only be detected at point-blank range. This means it's basically impossible to seal off the border from them. We simply don't have that many systems or that many air defense personnel. That's why they're building point-based air defense systems—a small perimeter is much easier to organize.
      Problems are created by objective circumstances. If you recall the United States, you'll see for yourself that even almost complete control of Iranian airspace and the air defense network of various countries cannot prevent drone launches or shoot down all the Shaheeds. And they've been fighting for a month. This is despite the fact that Ukraine is launching many times more drones at us than Iran is launching at the Gulf states.
      1. 0
        April 3 2026 10: 09
        We simply don’t have that many systems and that many air defense personnel.

        If they'd said it was necessary, and organized it properly, even I would have hobbled around with my aching joints. But everything was arranged in such a way that I only lasted four days in Barse-Bryansk. Such things happen there!
        1. 0
          April 4 2026 01: 29
          Timur Bystrov, it is impossible to shoot down all UAVs, just as it is impossible to block their launches.
          Remember that the enemies launched UAVs even from Russian territory.
          The only way to stop this nightmare is to complete the Second World War and make peace with Ukraine. In the meantime, we must endure and fight with all our might.
  6. -5
    April 2 2026 15: 56
    Everyone imagines himself a strategist, seeing the battle from the side.

    There was no underestimation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the beginning of the Central Military District. The operation was expertly planned and executed at the highest level. Our army reached Kyiv, forced Ukraine to make peace, and then retreated back to Russia.
    The fact that Ukraine subsequently changed its mind about fulfilling the Istanbul Agreements, mobilized and re-equipped with Western weapons in four months, and then attacked us is another story. If there was one thing we underestimated back then, it was the extent of the Ukrainian authorities' craziness. They rejected Istanbul's lenient terms, sacrificing the lives of millions of their citizens, only to permanently lose large swaths of territory and turn some Ukrainian citizens into Russians.
    The Stenka-Mykolaivka-Chervone-Podolske salient is very well fortified. It's easier to bypass than to assault it head-on. That's exactly what's happening now—it's been bypassed from both the south and the north, effectively encircled in a pincer movement.
    Just the other day, news arrived that our forces had broken through to the center of Konstantinovka. They also approached the city from Ilyinovka. And on the way to Druzhkovka and Rayskoye, two villages—Pavlovka and Novopavlovka—were recently captured. So, Priyut and Torskoye are next in line.
  7. +2
    April 2 2026 16: 32
    And isn't delaying the SVO for more than 4 years costing us a lot?
  8. 0
    April 2 2026 17: 55
    It's strange, if there are "terrorist fighters" there, why is all this still going on?! winked
  9. 0
    April 2 2026 18: 11
    Quote: Cyril
    And isn't delaying the SVO for more than 4 years costing us a lot?

    How long would the Central Military District have lasted without the flow of billions from Europe into Ukraine? The most important thing in war is money. So, make haste slowly.