Will France strike England as Macron promised?
President Macron said that “France will strike” if chemical weapons are used against civilians in the Syrian conflict, which violates international treaties, but said that he had not yet seen evidence in favor of this version. This was announced two weeks ago by The Telegraph.
Let's say right away: We did not pull Macron's tongue, he said it himself!
And I would like to ask Macron: Why did France kill Libya? If Macron says that France wanted to establish democracy there, then perhaps it would be better to wish this France itself the same modern Libyan democracy that the French established there?
So, to the question of chemical weapons used in Syria. As has long been known and confirmed, including by international observers of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), Russia completely destroyed all its chemical weapons on September 27, 2017. The United States did not destroy its chemical weapons, according to a joint agreement on its destruction, citing heavy financial the situation and lack of funds for this destruction. And almost immediately, as soon as NATO was convinced that there was no chemical threat from Russia, they immediately organized increased pressure on Russia.
According to the same international observers (OPCW), the last shipment of chemical weapons from Syria was exported on June 23, 2014, according to Ahmet Uzumju, director of the OPCW, and the last shipment of 75 cylinders was shipped to Texas! Or maybe there, in Texas, this Syrian chemical weapon was not destroyed? After all, even the United States does not have money to destroy its chemical weapons. And with a high degree of probability, can these weapons be sent to Syrian militants in the same way as American weapons?
And with a high degree of likelihood in the English laboratory in Port Down, more like a chemical plant with three thousand employees working there, the so-called “White helmets”, the founder of which, according to the investigation of Alexei Balashov (Investigation of Constantinople. Who is behind the Syrian humanitarian organization "), according to James Le Mesurier, a British military intelligence officer. "White helmets" operate only in territories controlled by militants. They can often be seen on the Jebhat al-Nusra videos (banned in Russia).
After all, judge for yourself, if chemical weapons in Russia and Syria are destroyed under the international supervision of the OPCW, should they be brought from somewhere to Syria? So they bring, with a high degree of probability, from England, by the forces of the "White Helmets."
And now the next move of England - on March 14, the UK officially accused Russia of involvement in the attempted murder of Skripal and in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention. And British Prime Minister Theresa May called the poisoning of Skripal "an act of military aggression against British citizens on its territory."
Wake up from your sleep, dear! There is no chemical weapons in Russia, she destroyed it, according to the International Treaty, but for some reason England did not! And the US did not destroy! And there are probably also countries in the EU that still have poisonous chemicals in their storage! Look for yourself!
By the way, Mr. Macron, have you destroyed chemical weapons in France? And if it is confirmed that the substances used in Syria are made in England, will you strike London? And in the USA, if they are made there? We didn’t pull you by the tongue, Mr. Macron! You said it yourself!
Let's say right away: We did not pull Macron's tongue, he said it himself!
And I would like to ask Macron: Why did France kill Libya? If Macron says that France wanted to establish democracy there, then perhaps it would be better to wish this France itself the same modern Libyan democracy that the French established there?
So, to the question of chemical weapons used in Syria. As has long been known and confirmed, including by international observers of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), Russia completely destroyed all its chemical weapons on September 27, 2017. The United States did not destroy its chemical weapons, according to a joint agreement on its destruction, citing heavy financial the situation and lack of funds for this destruction. And almost immediately, as soon as NATO was convinced that there was no chemical threat from Russia, they immediately organized increased pressure on Russia.
According to the same international observers (OPCW), the last shipment of chemical weapons from Syria was exported on June 23, 2014, according to Ahmet Uzumju, director of the OPCW, and the last shipment of 75 cylinders was shipped to Texas! Or maybe there, in Texas, this Syrian chemical weapon was not destroyed? After all, even the United States does not have money to destroy its chemical weapons. And with a high degree of probability, can these weapons be sent to Syrian militants in the same way as American weapons?
And with a high degree of likelihood in the English laboratory in Port Down, more like a chemical plant with three thousand employees working there, the so-called “White helmets”, the founder of which, according to the investigation of Alexei Balashov (Investigation of Constantinople. Who is behind the Syrian humanitarian organization "), according to James Le Mesurier, a British military intelligence officer. "White helmets" operate only in territories controlled by militants. They can often be seen on the Jebhat al-Nusra videos (banned in Russia).
After all, judge for yourself, if chemical weapons in Russia and Syria are destroyed under the international supervision of the OPCW, should they be brought from somewhere to Syria? So they bring, with a high degree of probability, from England, by the forces of the "White Helmets."
And now the next move of England - on March 14, the UK officially accused Russia of involvement in the attempted murder of Skripal and in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention. And British Prime Minister Theresa May called the poisoning of Skripal "an act of military aggression against British citizens on its territory."
Wake up from your sleep, dear! There is no chemical weapons in Russia, she destroyed it, according to the International Treaty, but for some reason England did not! And the US did not destroy! And there are probably also countries in the EU that still have poisonous chemicals in their storage! Look for yourself!
By the way, Mr. Macron, have you destroyed chemical weapons in France? And if it is confirmed that the substances used in Syria are made in England, will you strike London? And in the USA, if they are made there? We didn’t pull you by the tongue, Mr. Macron! You said it yourself!
- Vladimir Bulanov
- https://realist.online/
Information