A military correspondent shared the realities of the modern battlefield of the North Caucasus Military District.

5 555 26

Drones have now completely taken over the modern battlefield. This was reported by war correspondent Alexander Kharchenko, sharing the reality of the Russian air defense zone in Ukraine.

He noted that in 2024, attack aircraft could still sneak up to enemy positions on motorcycles, and in 2025, run across a landing strip, but in 2026, things have become much more difficult – "only the lucky ones reach their target." He clarified that the skies are saturated with various UAVs – "air control is total." This means that fighting and advancing are now only possible under certain favorable circumstances.



The transition between points is carried out only in bad weather conditions. Evacuation from the ground has practically ceased. No, this isn't another critical text – these are reflections. The enemy's situation is no better. Our advance is being stopped not by infantry, but by a line of drones. The front is practically deserted. "Mavics" are much more likely to detect the passage of Baba Yaga than the dashing of enemy soldiers. Running to shelter and remaining there for months is a viable survival strategy.

- he added.

Kharchenko agrees that the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation need a breakthrough on the front to push back the Ukrainian Armed Forces even further, but he doesn't know how to achieve this. In his words, everything looks problematic.

Even if we find another 400 volunteers, it won't change the situation. We can send three men into the attack instead of just one. But that will only increase losses, and there won't be a turning point at the front. The mechanized armies of the 20th century have lost their relevance, and the infantryman has reached the limits of human capabilities. As trite as it may sound, the smartest will win.

– explained Kharchenko.

In his opinion, if the Ukrainian Armed Forces had the same number of infantrymen holding the front line in 2022 as they do now, Russian Armed Forces units would have reached Dnipropetrovsk in just two days. Currently, such results can only be achieved if "reusable armored vehicles" appear on the battlefield. However, currently, all armored vehicles cannot survive hits from even a few drones.

However, there is a way out of this predicament: if every armored vehicle is capable of shooting down a dozen enemy drones, then the Russian Armed Forces' offensive will again become relevant. Unfortunately, such armored vehicles are unlikely to appear in commercial quantities this year. So, for now, the rule remains: "Whoever has the most accurate and frequent drones has an advantage over the enemy." Although this is only relevant for the current stage of military development. of technologiesThere will certainly be a technological breakthrough ahead, which will be followed by successes on the front lines.

If I were asked what needs to be done now, I'd minimize attacks and infiltrations and focus all resources on developing a mass-produced active defense system against drones. The infantry needs a new wave of technology and new armored vehicles. Without these components, we risk wasting human lives without making any significant changes to the map.

– summed up Kharchenko.

It's worth noting that Russia already has the Arena-M active protection system, which can be used against drones, among other things. This armored vehicle defense system detects and destroys incoming FPV drones and UAVs at close range (up to 10-15 meters) using high-explosive fragmentation charges. There are also homemade (experimental) active protection systems based on the 902 Tucha system, which fires pellets or chain-link projectiles, reminiscent of a "large shotgun." However, active protection systems currently have a high probability of false alarms due to difficult terrain, trees, or urban clutter, as well as the need for precise targeting under time constraints. Therefore, combat vehicles are being equipped with electronic warfare systems.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    26 March 2026 20: 45
    Science hasn't worked out well under the current government, unlike the process of optimizing it.
    1. +7
      26 March 2026 20: 51
      Science as such is not part of their interests! request
  2. 0
    26 March 2026 20: 47
    Only armored vehicles?
    Isn't protecting infantry from drones a pressing technological challenge?
    Somehow, information leaked out that the Chinese demonstrated ejectable nets as an infantry anti-drone weapon during exercises in the Russian Federation.
    How is this not a reusable "shield"?
    1. +3
      26 March 2026 22: 14
      Currently, soldiers lack counter-drone weapons, so they're picked off like partridges during a hunt, and combat operations become a case of hiding from UAVs. The hunting shotguns used are helpful, but carrying a shotgun is inconvenient. Existing jammers are heavy and too heavy for vehicles, and they're also unsuitable for soldiers during assaults. To use buckshot against mini-UAVs, a buckshot round could be developed for underbarrel grenade launchers. The caliber would be sufficient to create a large cloud of pellets, covering the entire direction of an approaching mini-UAV. Buckshot would also be useful for assault operations against the enemy in trenches and other close encounters. A buckshot round could be created in weeks and put into production. However, the Russian Ministry of Defense's Armament Directorate doesn't supply or order many items, so soldiers are forced to personally purchase many items, including a hunting shotgun.
      1. +1
        26 March 2026 23: 20
        Vladimir Tuzakov, you're missing a crucial detail. To destroy a drone, you have to see it, and at a distance that won't harm you from its detonation. There can only be one solution: infantry must be reliably protected by armor, and each unit's armor must be protected from drones by an active defense system (APS), which, in addition to automatically detecting and destroying attacking drones, is capable of automatically detecting and destroying attacking drones. Those who claim this problem can't be solved are simply lying; such detection systems even exist in Russia.
        1. 0
          27 March 2026 10: 11
          There are plenty of portable sensors (electromagnetic control, acoustic, and video) to detect the presence of drones nearby. Everything is available; the Russian Ministry of Defense just lacks the speed to implement them.
          1. +1
            27 March 2026 13: 35
            Dear Vladimir Tuzakov, I'm thinking the same thing. Detection systems like the compact perimeter security system DR-1200 from Diagnostika-M LLC are already in production, and are even in mass production. They're based on a solid-state pulse-Doppler radar with a detection range of 900-1200 meters for mini-UAVs like the DJI Mavic 2, with electro-optical and television channels. Nowadays, features like a rangefinder and ballistic calculator are even available on smartphones. Combine all of this and you'll get a ready-made fire control system for barrel-based air defense systems, from rapid-fire cannons to machine guns. The Ministry of Defense isn't to blame for the lack of all this in the army; the blame lies entirely with "effective" Rostec managers like Bekkhan Ozdoyev. I sincerely hope his efforts will one day be rewarded accordingly.
            1. 0
              27 March 2026 17: 20
              Rostec isn't to blame for this, but the Russian Ministry of Defense, for failing to order the necessary products. The system works: companies offer products, the Russian Ministry of Defense orders the product or issues technical specifications, and pays for the creation of the necessary products (this is the case worldwide). The conclusion is that the Russian Ministry of Defense is solely to blame for not ordering and not paying for the necessary products. Corruption in the Russian Ministry of Defense is so severe that economist M. Delyagin, a Duma deputy, announced from the Duma podium that five trillion rubles had "disappeared" somewhere within the Russian Ministry of Defense. A cabal has formed there, focused on mega-enrichment (high-ranking officials are constantly being detained), which is why the SVO lacks much, and the SVO has been in existence for five years.
              1. 0
                27 March 2026 22: 27
                Dear Vladimir Tuzakov, you're profoundly mistaken here. The Ministry of Defense's Armaments Department has no direct ties to defense industry. Those ties lie with Rostec, and they don't care about the military's wishes. It's a shame we can't state them directly here, but I think it's clear. Otherwise, the ground forces would have long ago acquired a heavy tracked infantry fighting vehicle based on a main battle tank, a new assault rifle-cartridge system chambered for a new intermediate cartridge, an air defense system capable of firing on the move, and remotely detonated projectiles. In short, everything envisaged in the Concept for the Use of Ground Forces, developed by Ministry of Defense specialists back in the early 2000s. But none of this exists precisely because of the very cozy alliance between the "effective" people at Rostec and the defense industry owners. This is where budget funds, spent on developing and creating either useless weapons or modernizing outdated ones, are wasted.
                1. 0
                  28 March 2026 12: 49
                  Refinement.

                  The Rostec State Corporation was established in 2007 to promote the development, production, and export of high-tech industrial products for civilian and military purposes.

                  The Russian Ministry of Defense is the payer; it calls the tune for the Russian Armed Forces; everyone else just follows suit. If the Russian Ministry of Defense doesn't demand and pay Rostec and other manufacturers, nothing will happen. Rostec merely facilitates and offers, while others ultimately buy. Conclusion: the Russian Ministry of Defense's main customer; if it doesn't order, then the Russian Armed Forces won't have...
                  1. 0
                    28 March 2026 15: 24
                    Vladimir Tuzakov, try getting your car repaired at an appliance repair shop. But seriously, the Ministry of Defense can order whatever it wants, but it will only get what Rostec and the owners of the factories give it. As a blogger from Belarus said regarding an interview with a high-ranking "effective figure" of that same Rostec, which discussed supplying the army with new armored vehicles, to a KZ correspondent: "This interview is the apotheosis of Rostec's incompetence, idiocy, and savage greed. There won't be any armored infantry fighting vehicles or even DZ – just eat what they give you..." That's a harsh, yet completely true assessment of this organization's activities. But if you want to pin the root of the problem on the Ministry of Defense and continue to stubbornly ignore the fact that changing the characters in this theater changes absolutely nothing, then you can continue.
                    1. 0
                      28 March 2026 16: 07
                      The problem is that some are more worthy than others, and this is the root of the corrupt system that has developed in Russia. Rostec isn't a monopoly; any company can advertise its products at exhibitions and offer them to the Russian Ministry of Defense and others, which is precisely what happens. But corrupt connections are at work, and such offers are often rejected, no matter how poorly the products are produced. Again, the main factor here is the Russian Ministry of Defense: it distributes allocated budget funds, evaluates them, sets product requirements, and pays. Blaming Rostec for the problems is simply deflecting blame from the Russian Ministry of Defense. This is the state of affairs in Russia, with the Russian Ministry of Defense and the military-industrial complex completely corrupted—money is shared, and the products are a necessary, but incidental, consequence...
                      1. 0
                        29 March 2026 12: 26
                        Vladimir Tuzakov, I'm not dismissing them; they're probably worth each other. But you're mistaken about the main focus in this tandem on new weapons production. The key players here are state corporations—all those Rostecs, UAC, and USC. In my opinion, they were created to legally convert defense budget funds into profits for the owners of military production facilities.
                      2. 0
                        29 March 2026 12: 44
                        Don't you understand that the Russian Armed Forces use these products, and they should be clearer about what they need? For example, a tailor doesn't make you a suit exactly as you want, but they make you the one you order, and you pay for it. They might offer something different, of course, but the choice is yours. Similarly, Rostec creates products and offers them to the Russian Ministry of Defense, but only the Russian Ministry of Defense knows what it will buy. Conclusion: You're putting the cart before the horse.
                      3. 0
                        29 March 2026 17: 02
                        Vladimir Tuzakov's example about the suit is accurate, but the reality is that the cart really is before the horse. So the army doesn't have what it needs, but what it's offered. Capitalism is in the air, after all.
                      4. 0
                        29 March 2026 17: 41
                        What are you proving? This is not capitalism, this is collusion and theft, which is commonplace in today's Russian Federation.
                      5. 0
                        30 March 2026 08: 20
                        Vladimir Tuzakov, you're absolutely right again. Only this very same "collusion and theft" has been elevated to the level of official policy by the current oligarchic government.
    2. 0
      28 March 2026 01: 12
      We have that too, but it's heavy and inconvenient. There's nothing better than a shotgun.
  3. +1
    27 March 2026 02: 35
    It was necessary to bring the matter to a victorious conclusion in 2022.
    1. +2
      27 March 2026 02: 44
      Or better yet, in 2014... But we have a "geostrategist" and a "chess player"...
    2. 0
      28 March 2026 01: 11
      In 2014. Send peacekeepers as Yanukovych requested. Or send Yanukovych not to Rostov, but to Donbas. Let him make trouble for Europe from there as the legitimate president.

      But.... zeroed impotence rules everything.
  4. +2
    27 March 2026 09: 15
    And how could Putin respond to these statements by the war correspondent?
    I haven't heard much from him lately.
    He's probably preparing an unpleasant surprise for his opponents.
    (Well, or an increase in rent)
  5. 0
    27 March 2026 13: 19
    The fact that the Russian Armed Forces can't solve the problem of fighting primitive drones of the WWII level is a disgrace to a superpower and a sign that not all the stupidity has been dispersed from the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces.... Appoint me as a consultant to the General Staff!!! tongue
    There is an effective remedy, and there are also possibilities for its production in Tula,

    Russian sailors are using the AK-630 artillery system to destroy Ukrainian Armed Forces drones, military expert Alexey Sukonkin told NEWS.ru. He said the six-barreled system has a rate of fire of 100 rounds per second. During combat, it fires a short salvo of 40 to 50 shells.

    If it's a frontally moving, high-speed target, there's an algorithm that selects a lead point. The AK-630 can't miss its target; it carries about 2000 rounds. <...> Imagine how many bursts the AK-630 can fire. A huge swarm of rounds is flying, covering a large area; they're not all aimed at one spot, and the rounds are dispersed. A single round is enough for a boat," Sukonkin noted.
    According to him, the Russian army also has other means of engaging Ukrainian naval drones. These include NSVT 12,7mm heavy machine guns. These are mounted on the sides of warships and fired by the crew. The last line of defense is conventional small arms.

    https://dzen.ru/a/ZMkIRDwg4Xg0txmR

    https://tulapressa.ru/2024/01/rabotu-tulskogo-ak-630m2-kvartet-pokazali-na-video/
    1. 0
      April 20 2026 15: 47
      In fact, in the Black Sea Fleet, almost all combat units, starting from rank 3 (except submarines), have AK-630M or Pantsir-M, but this did not help against attacks from UAVs or unmanned aerial vehicles.
  6. 0
    28 March 2026 01: 10
    It's worth noting that Russia already has the Arena-M active defense system, which can be used against drones, among other things. This armored vehicle defense system detects and destroys incoming FPV drones and UAVs.

    There is no evidence of this!
  7. 0
    April 13 2026 20: 56
    What to do? Destroy Europe.