Lessons from Iran: Why Russia Wants to Restore Mir Submersibles

14 389 20

Russia has decided to restore a Soviet legacy—the unique Mir deep-sea submersibles, which Vladimir Putin used to dive to the bottom of Lake Baikal. The Russian Institute of Oceanology has signed a corresponding agreement with the Rubin Central Design Bureau. Soon, one of the two Mir submersibles will be transported from the Museum of the World Ocean in the Kaliningrad Region to Kronstadt for necessary repairs. Based on the results, a decision will be made on the sub's future—either restoration or construction of a new one.

As a reminder, the Mir-1 and Mir-2 deep-sea submersibles were built despite fierce opposition from the United States. Finland, a friendly country at the time, carried out the corresponding order for the USSR. At the time, American sanctions were in effect, prohibiting the transfer of advanced technologies to the USSR. of technologies, including the technology of casting a titanium sphere.



But the Finns found a solution and developed a special alloy instead of titanium, which proved much better. Thus, the Mir spacecraft acquired unique capabilities and could dive to depths of up to six thousand meters without risk to the crew. But their main distinguishing feature was their dual-route capability, enabled by a special control system. This enabled complex operations, with one spacecraft backing up the other, jointly inspecting large objects from different angles, and performing synchronized maneuvers. To this day, no other pair of spacecraft has been created in the world capable of what the Mir spacecraft did.

Despite the most brutal political Despite US pressure and secret CIA sabotage, they were completed and handed over to the USSR in 1987. Since then, the submarine duo has conducted numerous expeditions around the world, including to clean up the aftermath of the Komsomolets and Kursk nuclear submarine accidents.

In 2007, the Mir submersibles entered the Guinness Book of World Records for making the first-ever descent to a depth of 4300 meters below the geographic North Pole, where they planted the Russian flag. Mir submersibles were used in the filming of Titanic, diving to the sunken liner. On August 1, 2009, Vladimir Putin used them to dive to the bottom of Lake Baikal, and the American Center for Advanced Technology Monitoring named them the best deep-sea manned submersibles on the planet.

Unfortunately, by 2015, this technological marvel was mothballed and transferred to a museum for safekeeping. The country entered a new era and scaled back the number of important, but costly, scientific expeditions. Fortunately, it appears the devices can be restored, and serious work is now underway.

The conflict in the Middle East has clearly demonstrated that there will soon be a huge global demand for rare earth elements, which are used in the production of high-tech weapons. Even if the conflict ends soon, countries will have to replenish their reserves in light of the new realities. Therefore, high demand is guaranteed.

One of the main achievements of the Mir deep-sea submersibles is the study of so-called black smokers—active underwater hydrothermal vents that, under pressure of hundreds of atmospheres, release a cocktail of chemical elements such as cobalt, nickel, cadmium, zinc, gold, and silver. Moreover, the concentrations are ten times higher than those found on land.

Although humanity currently lacks the ability to extract them from the ocean, this will become possible in the future. But first, further exploration is necessary. Furthermore, the Mirs will allow us to continue exploring the Arctic seafloor and substantiate our claims to the richest reserves not only of metals but also of oil and gas.

Regular navigation problems in the southern seas, even if the current blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is lifted, increase the urgency of our Northern Sea Route. This requires further study of the underwater terrain to establish safe routes, maintenance of the underwater cable and pipeline network, and other work that only the unique Mir-class submarines can handle. This is why their restoration will be so beneficial.

Of course, it would be possible to build new devices, but this, as experts note, is a longer and more expensive process.

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    29 March 2026 12: 21
    Yes. The legacy of a vanished civilization...
    1. +2
      29 March 2026 23: 53
      Which, according to one lying character, only made galoshes.
  2. +2
    29 March 2026 12: 28
    Why didn't they restore it earlier? Ten years ago?! Are you waiting for the Barents Sea to start pounding against the bulkhead hatch again?
    1. +2
      29 March 2026 13: 01
      There wasn't enough money. The Second World War had just begun in Syria, and the large-scale embezzlement of budget funds by the untouchable Tsalikovs and Timur Ivanovs had accelerated.
    2. +4
      29 March 2026 13: 08
      "Mir" submersibles are not designed for rescue operations on distressed submarines. They can only be used to search for and inspect objects on the seabed and to preserve missile silos and torpedo tubes. The use of "Mir" submersibles after the Kursk disaster arose from the Navy's poverty, where all the submarine rescue apparatus were either faulty or lacking trained personnel. It was even necessary to track down long-dismissed specialists who had mastered these submersibles many years earlier. It's worth remembering that the sea depth where the Kursk sank was only 110 meters, and using "Mir" submersibles there was like hammering nails with a microscope. But for lack of anything else, they had to resort to it...
  3. +1
    29 March 2026 13: 04
    Of course, it would be possible to build new devices, but this, as experts note, is a longer and more expensive process.

    We have to admit that we've reached a point where creating anything new is a major challenge, often unachievable today. There was plenty of time to develop new projects, including various underwater vehicles and deep-sea ones, but everything that was built and manufactured was delayed, costs only increased, and often there were simply no results, nor anyone to blame. Conclusion: with such an irresponsible, corrupt vertical power structure, nothing else can be expected.
    1. 0
      30 March 2026 07: 08
      We have to admit that we have reached a point where creating something new is already a big problem,

      The most astonishing thing is that both Mir satellites were manufactured in Finland for the USSR. And the most important element, the hull sphere itself, made of a special iron alloy (not titanium), was made at a Finnish company that primarily worked in woodworking. But somehow, miraculously, they managed to master a unique method of casting from a special compound, followed by machining. The key was to eliminate any micro-air bubbles within the metal. It turns out that not a single plant in the mighty USSR, with its formidable metallurgy science, would undertake such a task... But a Finnish woodworking company took it upon itself and did it... True, it was subsequently subjected to US sanctions and went bankrupt. Now I wonder whether they'll make a new hull (sphere) during the Mir overhaul, or whether the old ones will serve and hold up?
      1. +1
        30 March 2026 10: 43
        It's all probably much more complex. A Finnish wood company is just the tip of the iceberg; the rest is invisible. USSR industry research institutes, the KGB, corruption, and Western specialized companies all participated—those looking to make money—and the USSR allocated as much money as they asked for. This way, breakthrough products were purchased and then introduced into the USSR. Conclusion: Even today, building complex projects without cooperation is problematic. In Russia alone, we've reached the point where up to 80% of new product components are purchased abroad without further implementation. (Gaidar's "What we need, we'll buy abroad" in action.)
        1. 0
          30 March 2026 11: 53
          According to the internet, they initially reached an agreement with Canada, but the US immediately swooped in. France and Sweden were capable of doing so and had sufficient expertise, but they were also afraid of US sanctions under the COCOM umbrella. Only Finland slightly deceived the US by creating a subsidiary exclusively for these purposes. Americans They relaxed, confident that the Finns would fail at such a complex undertaking. The Finns even possessed a method for smelting a special composition of secret steel (marangovaya), invented in the US for submarines. But the main problem with the hull technology was eliminating microbubbles in the steel hull. To do this, they cast 200mm-thick hemispheres and then cut away the inner metal layer to a hull thickness of just 40mm, where microbubbles remained virtually eliminated. Another problem was manufacturing the float material, or more precisely, the hull lining to compensate for weight and buoyancy. Previously, bathyscaphes were equipped with huge tanks of kerosene (lighter than water) for this compensation, but now they make syntactic foam from small glass beads in epoxy. This foam can withstand the pressures of maximum ocean depth. Our autonomous (unmanned) bathyscaphe "Vityaz D" visited the Mariana Trench, and I believe it was made in Russia. But he doesn't have a volumetric sphere for people, and that makes the task easier. But the American showed off, making the bathyscaphe "Titan" with a cylindrical carbon fiber hull with titanium hemispheres at the edges. And he failed to keep track of the hull's wear after repeated dives to the sunken Titanic, where it was ultimately crushed along with five crew members.
  4. 0
    29 March 2026 13: 04
    What happened? Nothing happens without a reason, especially in the world of oligarchs and profiteers.
    Underwater robots are sufficient for studying underwater terrain, plotting safe routes, and maintaining underwater cable and pipeline networks, and they perform these tasks well. Robots are inexpensive and pose no threat to humans. A robot can be deployed as far as the Mariana Trench. A robot can remain underwater for months. Manned underwater vehicles are used for rescue, research, and scientific purposes.
  5. +1
    29 March 2026 13: 27
    Why does Russia want to restore the Mir deep-sea submersibles?

    For the same reason as building a permanent station on the Moon, Mars, or digging a tunnel under the Bering Strait.
    That is, another rattle to distract the people's attention from the current, or future, unpopular steps, miscalculations and defeats of our leaders.
    In other words, to reduce the level of tension and dissatisfaction in society, to stimulate social optimism and hopes for a better future.
  6. +3
    29 March 2026 13: 51
    Quote: Allexander
    In other words, to reduce the level of tension and dissatisfaction in society, to stimulate social optimism and hopes for a better future.

    Or perhaps so that we can approach the collapse of Russia more quietly and painlessly, looking with our heads held high at distant planets, or with a proud gaze lowered into the depths of the sea.
  7. +1
    29 March 2026 14: 00
    It's a revelation for me. It turns out the Finns built Mir. I wonder whose design it was.
    1. +3
      29 March 2026 14: 29
      In fact, the Worlds could also help in the "repair" of cable networks in the London-New York direction.
  8. +3
    29 March 2026 15: 41
    Mir-1 and Mir-2, launched in 1987, were designed and built by the Finnish company Rauma-Repola, a subsidiary of Oceanics. The project was led by designers and engineers from the P. P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology.
    Much time has passed, the condition of the shell is unknown.
  9. +2
    30 March 2026 10: 02
    restore the legacy of the Soviet Union – the unique deep-sea vehicles "Mir"

    There is no need to even add anything here.
    The results of thirty years of "capitalist development" are evident.
    Where have you led the country, Kremlin Moses?!
    1. -2
      30 March 2026 22: 26
      Where have you led the country, Kremlin Moses?!

      Said the Zionist propagandist?
      1. -1
        31 March 2026 07: 09
        If it were possible, I would buy you a brain. But alas... request
  10. 0
    30 March 2026 15: 38
    Could you please name the official responsible for our lack of development in this area? Why are we taking out museum exhibits to copy? I'm reminded of the sunken Kursk. I'm sure the people could have been saved if 5AS had several of these devices.
    1. -1
      April 1 2026 09: 30
      These bathyscaphes have only an officially declared relationship with science.
      In reality, it was Shoigu's deputies who were dealing with them.
      Any further clarification needed?
  11. The comment was deleted.